cigarette smoking, cvd risk, and cessation strategies 051207 - an
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
- 1. CIGARETTE SMOKING, CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE RISK, AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES FOR SMOKING CESSATION Adapted and Modified from: Luepker RV, Lando HA. Tobacco Use and Passive Smoking, in: Wong ND, Black HR, Gardin JM, eds. Preventive Cardiology, Mc Graw Hill, 2000 and NANCY HOUSTON MILLER, R.N., B.SN., Stanford University Roger Blumenthal, MD et al ACC Prevention Guidelines 2007
- 2. Smoking Statement Issued in 1956 by American Heart
Association
- It is the belief of the committee that much greater knowledge is needed before any conclusions can be drawn concerning relationships between smoking and death rates from coronary heart disease. The acquisition of such knowledge may well require the use of techniques and research methods that have not hitherto been applied to this problem.
- Circulation 1960; vol. 23
- 3. Arch Intern Med . 2003;163:23012305. Surgeon Generals Health Consequences of Smoking, 2004. CDC/NCHS. Tobacco-Related Mortality, Fact Sheet. CDC.gov/tobacco. February 2004. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics2005 Update, AHA. MMWR, Vol. 51, No. 14, 2002, CDC/NCHS. 33.5% of smoking-related deaths among Americans are cardiovascular-related Male smokers die an average of 13.2 years earlier than male nonsmokers Female smokers die an average of 14.5 years earlier than female nonsmokers Current cigarette smoking is a powerful independent predictor of sudden cardiac death in patients with CHD Cigarette smoking results in a two- to threefold risk of dying from CHD Smoking: Mortality
- 4. CHD Risk by Cigarette Smoking. Filter Vs. Non-filter. Framingham Study . Men 25 cigarettes/day
- Acute MI and sudden death strongly associated with cigarette smoking.
- Cigarette smoking has additive effect to CHD risk above lipids, obesity, diabetes, and hypertension
- 35,000-40,000 deaths annually from acute MI are associated with environmental tobacco exposure, significantly more than due to lung cancer.
- Recent meta analysis of passive smoking incorporating home-based and workplace studies (1699 cases) showed relative risk of 1.49 (1.29-1.72)
- Sidestream smoke released into the environment may be more toxic and nonsmokers who are exposed regularly develop various physiologic changes and are more sensitive than regular smokers.
- Lower HDL-C and platelet abnormalities, higher CO levels and lower exercise tolerance are noted.
- School-based prevention programs
-
- Social environment / influences
- Community-based prevention programs
-
- May enhance effects of school-based programs
- State and federal prevention initiatives
-
- Anti-tobacco media campaigns
-
- Restrictions on tobacco advertising
-
- Restrictions on tobacco availability to minors
-
- Restrictions on smoking in public places including schools
-
- Increased taxation
- Contingency contracting (wards for abstinence)
- Social support (from clinician, group, family, friends)
- Relaxation techniques (progressive relaxation, deep breathing)
- Stimulus control and cue extinction (restricting where smoking takes place)
- Coping skills
- Reduced smoking and nicotine fading (gradual reduction)
- Multicomponent treatment programs
- Hypnosis
- Acupuncture
- Self-help (written materials, videos, tapes, hotlines, helplines)
- Computer-tailored messages
- Other toxins in tobacco smoke, not nicotine, are responsible for majority of adverse health effects
-
- >4000 different chemicals
-
-
- Tar, carbon monoxide, irritants, and oxidant gases
-
-
- >40 carcinogens
- The main adverse effect of nicotine from tobacco is addiction, which sustains tobacco use
- Nicotine dependence leads to continued exposure to toxins in tobacco smoke
- NRT is safe in most individuals with cardiovascular disease, even with concomitant smoking
- There is a negligible risk of cancer compared to the risk from continued smoking
- Although it is a potential fetal teratogen, the benefits outweigh the risks of smoking during pregnancy
- There is a low risk of abuse
- Includes low tar and light cigarettes, and novel products that deliver nicotine with minimal tobacco combustion
- Low tar cigarettes have not be shown to substantially reduce health hazards of smoking but do provide sufficient nicotine to sustain addiction
- Some novel products may deliver fewer or lower levels of toxins but some deliver more carbon monoxide.
- Smoking cessation medications are most likely safer than any reduced risk cigarette
- Snuff or chewing tobacco has been suggested as a potential aid to harm reduction or smoking cessation
- Such products known to cause oral cancer
- Smokeless tobacco is addictive and not recommended for smoking cessation
-
- TREATMENT OF TOBACCO MUST BE CONSIDERED A CHRONIC DISEASE
-
- ALL CLINICIANS SHOULD OFFER AT LEAST A 3 MIN COUNSELING INTERACTION AT EVERY VISIT
-
- ALL SMOKERS WILLING TO QUIT SHOULD BE OFFERED PHARMACOTHERAPY (EXCEPTIONS: PREGNANT/ BREAST - FEEDING WOMEN, ADOLESCENTS, THOSE WITH MEDICAL CONTRAINDICATIONS, OR < 10 CIGS/DAY)
-
- CLINICIANS AND HEALTH CARE DELIVERY SYSTEMS MUST IDENTIFY, DOCUMENT, AND TREAT EVERY TOBACCO USER
-
- INSURERS AND PURCHASERS SHOULD REIMBURSE:
-
-
- a. COUNSELING/PHARMACOTHERAPY FOR
-
-
-
- PATIENTS
-
-
-
- b. CLINICIANS WHO PROVIDE TOBACCO
-
-
-
- DEPENDENCE TREATMENT
-
-
- AMA - (1) ALL CHRONIC STABLE CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE PTS IDENTIFIED AS SMOKERS DURING THE REPORTING YEAR
-
- (2) ALL CHRONIC STABLE CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE PTS WHO RECEIVE TOBACCO CESSATION INTERVENTION IN THE REPORTING YEAR
-
- HCFA - ALL AMI PTS. SMOKING WITHIN ONE YEAR PRIOR TO ADMISSION WHO RECEIVE SMOKING CESSATION ADVICE OR COUNSELING DURING HOSPITALIZATION
-
- NCQA - BY SURVEY ALL CURRENT/RECENT QUITTERS THAT HAD ONE OR MORE VISITS INDICATING THEY RECEIVED ADVICE TO QUIT FROM AN MCO PRACTITIONER
-
- JCAHO - ALL AMI PATIENTS SMOKING WITHIN THE YEAR PRIOR TO ADMISSION WHO RECEIVE SMOKING CESSATION ADVICE OR COUNSELING DURING HOSPITALIZATION
- 30-40 MILLION PEOPLE HOSPITALIZED ANNUALLY
- 20-30% OF HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS SMOKE
- MOST SMOKERS HAVE HAD TO QUIT
- GREATER MOTIVATION TO QUIT
- OPPORTUNITY FOR COUNSELING
- INHOSPITAL
-
- RN/MD COUNSELING
-
- AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS
-
- SELF-HELP PAMPHLETS
- POSTHOSPITAL
-
- RN INITIATED PHONE CALLS:
-
-
- WEEKLY X 2-3 WEEKS
-
-
-
- MONTHLY X 4-6 MONTHS
-
-
- NICOTINE REPLACEMENT THERAPY
-
- 1-2 FACE-TO-FACE VISITS AS NEEDED
- PRIMARY AIM
- TO DETERMINE EFFECTIVENESS OF INITIAL IMPLEMENTATION INTO SEVERAL HOSPITALS IN SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA
- SECONDARY AIM
- TO IMVESTIGATE FACTORS THAT PREDICT SUSTAINABILITY OF STAYING FREE
- WHAT PATIENTS RECEIVE:
-
- A STRONG PHYSICIAN MESSAGE ABOUT THE HAZARDS OF SMOKING
-
- A 17 PAGE WORKBOOK ON QUITTING SMOKING
-
- A 16 MINUTE VIDEOTAPE SHOWN AT THE BEDSIDE ABOUT HOW TO REMAIN AN EX-SMOKER
-
- A RELAXATION AUDIOTAPE
- WHAT PATIENTS RECEIVE:
-
- A COUNSELING SESSION AT THE BEDSIDE BY A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL
-
- PHARMACOLOGICAL THERAPY AS NEEDED
-
- FOLLOW-UP PHONE CALLS FROM HOSPITAL STAFF AND/OR PUBLIC HEALTH (1 TO 4)
-
- OUTPATIENT REFERRALS TO PUBLIC HEALTH PROGRAMS AND OTHER LOCAL RESOURCES
- SPECIAL FEATURES:
-
- INTERVENTION PROVIDED BY PSYCHOLOGISTS, PSYCHOLOGY INTERNS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE NURSE
-
- USE OF CLOSED CIRCUIT TV TO SHOW VIDEO
-
- USE OF COMPUTERIZED STAYING FREE TEMPLATES TO DOCUMENT INTERVENTION IN PATIENTS ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS
-
- STAYING FREE GROUP E-MAIL CREATED TO DISSEMINATE INFORMATION/UPDATES TO TEAM
-
- ASK ME ABOUT STAYING FREE ID TAGS FOR STAFF
- SPECIAL FEATURES:
-
- INTERVENTION PROVIDED BY PHYSICIANS
-
- FOLLOW-UP PHONE CALLS PROVIDED BY SANTA CLARA COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH TOBACCO PREVENTION AND EDUCATION PROGRAM
-
- SPANISH AND VIETNAMESE LANGUAGE VERSIONS OF STAYING FREE
-
- CERTIFICATES OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR PATIENTS
- SPECIAL FEATURES:
-
- MILLS-PENINSULA HEALTH SERVICES
-
-
- INTERVENTION PROVIDED BY CARDIAC REHABILITATION AND A DIVERSE TEAM OF VOLUNTEERS (NURSING STUDENT, FORMER CARDIAC REHABILITATION PATIENTS, MENDED HEARTS VOLUNTEERS, RETIRED COUNSELORS)
-
-
-
- DEDICATED STAYING FREE PHONE LINE
-
-
- COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF LOS GATOS
-
-
- INTERVENTION PROVIDED BY STAFF CHAPLAIN
-
-
-
- COMPUTERIZED IDENTIFICATION OF ALL SMOKERS AT ADMISSION
-
-
- STEP 1:
-
- DETERMINE PERCENTAGE OF ALL SMOKERS ENTERING A HOSPITAL WHO SMOKED IN PAST 30 DAYS
-
-
-
- ADMISSION SHEETS
-
-
-
-
-
- FACE TO FACE CONTACT (2-4 WEEKS)
-
-
-
- STEP 2:
-
- ACTIVELY SCREEN ALL SMOKERS
-
-
- UTILIZE COMPUTERIZED ADMISSION FORM
-
-
-
- INCORPORATE INTO NURSING HISTORIES
-
-
-
- INTEGRATE AS PART OF STANDING CCU/CSU ADMISSION ORDERS
-
-
-
- INCORPORATE AS A VITAL SIGN
-
-
-
- USE PATIENT STICKERS
-
-
- STEP 3:
-
- EXPECT ALL HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS TO INTERVENE
-
-
- ASK ABOUT SMOKING STATUS APPROPRIATELY
-
-
-
- OFFER MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEW
-
-
-
- DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT (TRACKING FORM, PROGRESS NOTES)
-
-
- STEP 4:
-
- TRAIN ALL MDs TO RESPOND
-
-
- ASK ABOUT SMOKING STATUS APPROPRIATELY
-
-
-
- OFFER STRONG, CREDIBLE MESSAGE ABOUT QUITTING
-
-
-
- DETERMINE NEED FOR PHARMACOLOGICAL THERAPY
-
-
-
- DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT (MEDICAL RECORD, TRACKING FORM)
-
-
- STEP 5:
-
- CONSIDER A SYSTEM TO OFFER SELF-HELP MATERIALS AND BEHAVIORAL COUNSELING
-
-
- STANDARDIZE PATIENT EDUCATION MATERIALS
-
-
-
- UTILIZE CLOSED-CIRCUIT TELEVISION FOR VIDEOTAPES
-
-
-
- DETERMINE WHO CAN BE TRAINED TO PROVIDE BEHAVIORAL COUNSELING (ie. VOLUNTEERS, CANDIDATE MEDICAL STUDENTS, CHAPLAINS, NURSES, PSYCHOLOGISTS)
-
-
-
- PROVIDE A LIST OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES
-
-
- STEP 6:
-
- DETERMINE A MECHANISM FOR FOLLOW-UP
-
-
- USE SMOKING INTERVENTIONISTS TO UNDERTAKE PATIENT FOLLOW-UP
-
-
-
- OFFER TELEPHONE CONTACT BY HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS ALREADY MAKING CALLS
-
-
-
- INTEGRATE CALLS WITHIN PUBLIC HEALTH DEPT.
-
-
-
- USE CENTRALIZED TELEPHONE SYSTEM FOR ALL SMOKERS WITHIN COMMUNITY
-
-
-
- DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT
-