chronic diseases and restrictive diets
DESCRIPTION
Chronic Diseases and Restrictive Diets. Common Restrictive Diets: Low/no sugar (Diabetes) Low fat (Elevated cholesterol) Low sodium (Congestive heart failure) Combination of above (High blood pressure) Associated with poor intake May be seen in specific ethnic groups - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
• Common Restrictive Diets:– Low/no sugar (Diabetes)– Low fat (Elevated cholesterol)– Low sodium (Congestive heart failure)– Combination of above (High blood pressure)
• Associated with poor intake• May be seen in specific ethnic groups
– Decreased meat intake– Other dietary preferences and restrictions
Chronic Diseases and Restrictive Diets
Dental Problems: Tooth Loss
• Most common causes of tooth loss: Inability or unwillingness to access and
pay for preventive/restorative treatment Loosening of teeth from periodontal
disease Removal of healthy teeth in preparation
for dental prosthesis
• Leads to diminished chewing efficiency and reduced range of preferred foods
Dental Problems: Removable Dentures
• Can aid in speech• Restores facial contours• Less likely to restore
ability to chew (restriction in range of foods)
• Requires frequent professional adjustment
• Not covered by Medicare < 10% of older persons have dental insurance
Screening for Under-nutrition or Malnutrition
Can use a combination of: Serial body weight Weight loss over the past months/yrs Nutrition history: appetite, # of meals/day,
taste & amount of food eaten Laboratory Values: Low serum cholesterol
and/or albumin
Cultural Competency & Frailty
• There is a need to include significant family members in health care discussions.
• It is important to educate both the patient and significant family members regarding the impact of frailty, nutrition and prevention strategies.
Cultural Competency & Frailty
• Family members instrumental in assuring preventive measures and treatment plans are implemented.
• Family members can also be a part of the problem, particularly regarding nutrition.
• By educating family members you:– make them a part of the solution– increase your understanding of potential barriers
to treatment.
Cultural Competency & Frailty
• Many older ethnic minorities lack formal education.
• May have difficulty understanding words, concepts and procedures discussed in a medical setting.
• Important to use words that are easily understood and provide examples. – Reduce carbohydrates– Reduce your intake of cereals, rice and breads
Nutrition Team Challenge
• You are a team gathered together by the CEO of your hospital.
• The CEO tells you that a recent survey by the nutrition department demonstrated a large proportion of your hospital’s patients were having eating difficulties and poor nutrition during the hospital stay and this was negatively impacting on their functional status after discharge.
Nutrition Team Challenge
• Move importantly (to the CEO) this group was having higher 30-day readmission rates.
• Your task is to define potential reasons for the eating difficulties and develop some potential solutions for the problem of eating difficulties and poor nutrition during hospitalization among the older adults admitted to your hospital.
Consequences of Frailty: Falls
• One-third of community-dwelling persons
age > 65, fall each year; less than half talk to their healthcare provider about it.
• In approximately half of the cases, falls are recurrent
• Rates increase – With age– During the month after hospital discharge
Falls Incidence: Community
• In next 17 seconds, an older adult will be treated in hospital ED for fall related injuries.
• 10-15% of falls result in injury requiring medical attention
• Functional deterioration including:– Fear of falling / loss of confidence
• 40-73% of recent fallers• 20-46% without recent fall
– Self-limitation of activities
Falls Morbidity: Community
• Unintentional injury, 5th leading cause of death in those > 65 years– Majority due to falls– Especially in those > 85 years
• Deaths often related to consequences after the fall, not the fall itself– Hospitalization– Decreased activity
Falls Mortality: Community
• Leading cause of injury-related visits to emergency departments in US
• In 2009, 2.2 million nonfatal fall injuries treated in emergency departments.
• Direct medical costs of falls: $28.2 billion in 2010 dollars.
• Numbers expected to climb as population ages
Falls Cost: Community
• Focus of most fall research • Falls in community-dwelling older adults tend
to be multifactorial in nature• As number of risk factors increases, so does
risk of falls
Fall Risk Factors : Community
Occurrence of Falls According to Number of Risk Factors
(Tinetti, 1988)
Number of Risk Factors
Most Common Risk Factors for Falls (AGS Guidelines, 2011)
Muscle weakness 10/11 4.4 1.5-10.3
History of falls 12/13 3.0 1.7-7.0
Gait deficit 10/12 2.9 1.3-5.6
Balance deficit 8/11 2.9 1.6-5.4
Use asst device 6/12 2.6 1.2-4.6
Visual deficit 6/12 2.5 1.6-3.5
Arthritis 3/7 2.4 1.9-2.9
Cognitive impairment
4/11 1.8 1.0-2.3
Risk factor Significant/total Mean RR-OR Range
Ambulatory Devices-Unilateral
Device Benefits Drawbacks Clinical situations
Straight cane
• Assists with balance and proprioception
• Reduced weight bearing on opposite side
• May not provide enough support
• Doesn’t stand up on its own making it difficult to carry objects and open doors
• Osteoarthritis of knee or hip
• Peripheral neuropathy
Quad or 4-point cane
• More stable than straight cane
• Allows greater weight bearing on device
• Heavier than single point cane
• Increased base of support may increase risk of tripping over device
• Stroke with hemiparesis
Ambulatory Devices-BilateralDevice Benefits Drawbacks Clinical situations
Two-wheeled Rolling Walker
• Easier to advance than standard walker
• Allows smoother, faster gait pattern
• Less stable than standard walker
• Turns less smooth than rollator due to fixed wheels
• Deconditioning
• Parkinson’s dz
Standard “Pick-up” Walker
• Very stable • Allows non-weight
bearing movement
• Must be lifted requiring strength/ coordination
• Gait pattern and turns not smooth due to lack of wheels
• Hip fracture; non-weight bearing
• After amputation
Rollator or 4-wheeled walker
• Allows for smoother, faster gait
• Large wheels: turns easy; good outside
• Seat for resting
• Less stable than standard or rolling walker
• Requires increased coordination due to brakes
• More expensive than other walkers
• Cardiopulmonary dz
• Peripheral neuropathy with balance difficulty
• Rodriguez O, Ruiz J, Phancao F. "Assistive Devices" Learning Object. MedEdPORTAL; 2007. Available from: www.mededportal.org/publication/379
• van Zuilen M, Rodriguez O, Paniagua M, Mintzer M. Choosing the Appropriate Assistive Device: A Card Sorting Activity. MedEdPORTAL; 2008. Available from: www.mededportal.org/publication/823
Resources for Teaching about Assistive Devices
• Psychotropics, any: RR 1.73 (1.52-1.97)– Neuroleptics: 1.50 (1.25-
1.79)– Sedative/hypnotics: 1.54 (1.40-
1.70)– Antidepressants: 1.66 (1.40-1.95)– Benzodiazepines: 1.48 (1.23-1.77)
• Diuretics: 1.08 (1.02-1.16)
• Anti-arrhythmics (Ia) : 1.59 (1.02-2.48)• Digoxin: 1.22
(1.05-1.42)
Medications and Falls
• Multifactorial assessment of risk factors and management of risk factors identified
• Adaptation/Modification of home environment• Exercise, particularly balance, strength, and
gait training• Withdrawal/Minimization of psychoactive
medications• Withdrawal/Minimization of other medications• Management of postural hypotension• Management of foot problems and footwear
[A]
[A][A]
[B]
[C][C][C]
Recommended InterventionsLevel of
Evidence
Falls in the Hospital Setting
CMS “Never” Events
• “Never events” are errors in medical care that are clearly identifiable, preventable, and serious in their consequences for patients.
• Patient death or injury associated with a fall while being cared for in a healthcare facility considered a “never” event.
Hospital Risk Factors
• Several factors consistently reported– Gait instability– Agitated confusion– Urinary incontinence/ frequency– Falls history– Medications especially sedative/hypnotics
Multifaceted Interventions: Hospitals• A recent meta-analyses showed rate ratio of
0.82 (95% CI 0.68-0.997) for falls• No significant effect on # of fallers or fractures• Multifaceted interventions included:
– risk assessment – removal of physical restraints– medical/diagnostic approaches– changes in physical environment – medication review– exercise– care planning– hip protectors
Results of Meta-Analysis
• A recent meta-analyses of 13 studies showed a rate ratio of 0.82 (95% CI 0.68-0.997) for falls but no significant effect on number of fallers or fractures– Study included historical controls
• A second study that used only prospective controlled trial designed studies found no conclusive evidence that fall prevention programs reduced falls.
Coussement J, et al. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2008
Frailty and Disability
Nagi’s Disablement Model
Active Pathology• Normal cellular processes and homeostatic efforts to return
to normal state are interrupted
Impairment• Loss or abnormality at the organ or tissue level
Functional Limitation • Have physical or mental limitation at the individual level
Disability • Have physical or mental limitation in a social context (i.e.
socially defined roles or tasks)
Active Pathology
ImpairmentFunctional Limitation
Disability
Criticism of Early Disablement Models
• Presented response to disease or illness as a static process with a linear progression through the disablement process.
• It was recognized the interaction between disease and disability is more complex, particularly for older persons.
ICF Model
• International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) released by World Health Organization (WHO)in 2001 by WHO.
• Describes decreases in function as consequence of dynamic interaction between various health conditions and contextual factors.
• Disability is defined as any decline at any of these levels.
Health ConditionDiseases, disorders,
injuries or aging
ActivityExecution of a task or
action
Body Functions & Structures
Physiologic functions and anatomical parts of body
ParticipationApplication to a real
life situation
Environmental FactorsPhysical, social and attitudinal
environment in which people live
Personal Factors Characteristics of person not part of health
condition or illness
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
Model Used to Discuss Frailty
• We could describe an older woman who has a history of osteoarthritis of the knees and hypertension who presents to rehabilitation after a hip fracture. She lives alone in a second floor apartment and has a daughter who lives six hours away. The patient has a large circle of friends and regularly attends social gatherings at the local senior center.
Health ConditionNew hip fracture
Osteoarthritis Hypertension
Activity
Unable to walk long distances or
climb stairs
Body Functions and Structures
Impairment of ambulation due to hip fracture and
knee pain
ParticipationMissing social
events/ friends Worried about remaining in
apartment alone
Environmental Factors
Lives in second floor apartment
Lives alone, no available caregiver
Personal Factors Great attitude
Large circle of friends
Case Development
• As a team develop a case of a frail person with at least 3 issues contributing to their difficulty in an ICF domain.
• Break the case down by domain/problem to fit into the ICF model.
• After completing your case we will swap cases and develop potential solutions for the problems raised.