Chief, National Guard Bureau

Information Brief

National Guard(Army & Air)

Army Reserve

Air ForceReserve

Navy Reserve

Marine CorpsReserve

National GuardNational Guard

54.2%54.2%

Army Army -- 350,000350,000

Air Air -- 107,000107,000USARUSAR

23.7%23.7%

200,000200,000

USAFR 8.9% 74,900

USNR 8.5% 71,300

USMCR 4.7% 39,600

Where Do We Fit?

(Selected Reserves per FY 07 Authorization Act)

NG Contributions to NORTHCOM

• 55 Civil Support Teams (WMD-CST)• 54 Quick Reaction Forces (500 men each NLT 24 hrs)• 54 Joint Force Headquarters – State (w/standing JTF)• 54 Computer Emergency Response Teams• 17 CERFP• CCMRF – 70% capability • 6 Joint Critical Infrastructure Assessment Teams• Joint CONUS Communications Support Environment• Joint Interagency Training Center

Essential toEmergency Response

Essential toHomeland Defense

Essential toHomeland Security

Tucson

Del Rio Laredo

Rio Grande Valley

Yuma

El Centro

San Diego

AZ

TX

CA

El PasoMarfa

NM

NV

September 11, 2001A New Operational Force

6 Years Later

39/720Joint Incident Site Communications Capability

10WMD Civil Support Teams

54

550Joint Operations Centers

540National Guard Reaction ForcesTeams

60Critical Infrastructure Assessment

540Computer Emergency Response Teams

12/170CBRNE Enhanced Response Force Packages

0Joint Force Headquarters-State

September 2001 Today

52/5510Joint Interagency Training Capability

• 50-60K to the war fight• State Partnership Program

• Arizona / Kazakhstan• Colorado / Jordan• Montana / Kyrgyzstan• Nevada / Turkmenistan• Virginia / Tajikistan

NG Contributions to CENTCOM

Essential to theWar Fight

NG Contributions to PACOM

• State Partnership Program• Hawaii / Indonesia• Alaska / Mongolia• Hawaii/Guam / Philippines• Washington / Thailand

NG Contributions to SOUTHCOM

• State Partnership Program - 20• Joint Interagency Task Force South• Counter Narcotics• GITMO Support• Mass Migration CONUS/Cuba• Consequence Management• JTF Bravo

• State Partnership Programs - 26 • C-130 Support• Operational Mission Support• C-17 Patient Evacuation Support (Landstuhl)• Bosnia and Kosovo Peace Keeping Operations• Sinai

NG Contributions to EUCOM

NG Contributions to AFRICOMSubunified command of EUCOM

• NGB Positions on the Joint Manning Document (JMD)• State Partnership Program

• New York / South Africa• Wyoming / Tunisia• Utah / Morocco• North Dakota / Ghanna• California / Nigeria• ? / Botswana• ? / Senegal

Essential for Building Coalition Partnership Capacity

SOUTHCOM - 20Arkansas / GuatemalaConnecticut / UruguayDelaware / Trinidad-TobagoDistrict of Columbia / JamaicaFlorida / VenezuelaFlorida / GuyanaFlorida/ VI/Eastern CaribbeanKentucky / EcuadorLouisiana / BelizeMassachusetts / ParaguayMississippi / BoliviaMissouri / PanamaNew Hampshire / El SalvadorNew Mexico/Costa RicaPuerto Rico / HondurasPuerto Rico / Dominican RepublicRhode Island / BahamasSouth Dakota/ SurinameWest Virginia / PeruWisconsin / Nicaragua

PACOM - 4Alaska / MongoliaHawaii/Guam / PhilippinesWashington / ThailandHawaii/Indonesia

EUCOM - 26Alabama / RomaniaCalifornia / UkraineCalifornia/ NigeriaColorado / SloveniaGeorgia / GeorgiaIllinois / PolandIndiana / SlovakiaKansas / ArmeniaMaine/MontenegroMaryland / EstoniaMaryland / BosniaMichigan / LatviaMinnesota / CroatiaNew Jersey / AlbaniaNew York / South AfricaNorth Carolina / MoldovaNorth Dakota / GhanaOhio / HungaryOhio/Serbia Oklahoma / AzerbaijanPennsylvania / LithuaniaTennessee / BulgariaTexas/Neb / Czech RepublicUtah / MoroccoVermont / MacedoniaWyoming / Tunisia

CENTCOM - 6Arizona / KazakhstanColorado / JordanLouisiana / UzbekistanMontana / KyrgyzstanNevada / TurkmenistanVirginia / Tajikistan

Bilateral - 2Iowa / RussiaMinnesota / Norway

TOTALSPartnerships 56Bilateral 2

• 11% of Inter-Theater Lift• 43% of Intra-Theater Lift• 45% of Tankers

NG Contributions to TRANSCOM

NG Contributions to STRATCOM

• National Mobile Command Control Communications• Missile Defense System (Alaska & Colorado)• Cyber Defense Teams

• Two Special Forces Groups• ISR• Commando Solo

NG Contributions to SOCOM

NG Contributions to JFCOM

T32 / SAD Joint Force Provider Role• Facilitator for emergency ManagementAssistance Compact (EMAC)(insulates T10 forces from being committed when not needed)

ReadyReliable

EssentialAccessible

. . . Offering uniquely American . . . Offering uniquely American solutions to the complex security solutions to the complex security challenges our nation faces both at challenges our nation faces both at home and abroad.home and abroad.

Transformation Imperatives

Strategic Reserve Operational ForceActive Service DraftAmple time for buildupTime-phased, overseas fightThreat-based forceLinear formationsSymmetric threatsSingle service/component

Volunteer/Recruited ForceNo/limited noticeAny time/any whereCapabilities-based forceModular unitsAsymmetric threatsJoint/multi-component/multinational

Minuteman values and missions

transcend time1636 1903 (Dick Act) 2001

Constitutional Militia = Operational Force (since 1636)

Federal Role = Strategic Reserve (1903-2001),

but is since transforming

T10/T32SAD

Overseas Conflict

BorderSecurityLocal & State

CrisisManagement

Preemptive andRetaliatory Strikes

MissileDefense/

Air Sovereignty

Law Enforcement(MSCLEA)

Regional ConsequenceManagement

(EMAC)

AirportSecurity

Local & State ConsequenceManagement

CounterNarco-

Terrorism

Physicalor CyberAttack onHomeland

NationalSecuritySpecialEvents

CriticalInfrastructure

Protection(CIP)

2 Swiftlydefeat

efforts intwo regions

1Win

decisivelyin oneregion

1Defense of the Homeland

TheaterSecurity

Cooperation

Continuum of Operations

Governor Equities 4 Deter

forward infour critical

regions

Army & Air National Guard Core Capabilities

ESSENTIAL 10Joint Force Headquarters (State)Civil Support Teams

Maintenance Aviation Engineer (Technical Search & Rescue)Medical (Mass Decon)CommunicationsTransportationSecurityLogistics

50%- Homeland

Defense- Homeland

Security- National

Response Plan- All Hazards

Plans

25%Mobilized

&Deployed

Forces

25%Enhanced PoolIntensiveTraining

Getting Ready

•Progress being made due to redeployment/RESET

•Most modern equipment to OIF/OEF

55%59%57%

46%48%43%

47%51%52%

VI

Equipment in States PossessionArmy National Guard

AK

ND

KY

MI

OHINIL

WI

MN

IANE

TX

OK

KSMO

AR

LA

NM

WA

ORID

MT

WY

SD

CA

NV UT

AZ

CO

GUHI

FL

GA SC

NCTN

MSAL

PA

MENHVT

NY

NJ

WV VA

CT

RI

MA

DEMD

DC

PR

All LINs not currently deployed or SBE against FY07 MTOEs: AVG = 49%

49%52%53%

56%63%53%

52%62%58%

51%55%49%

55%60%57%

57% 62%62%

39%46%51%

58%63%55%

65%76%62%

60%69%63%

60%61%59%

52%57%48%

51%63%55%47%/49%

53%

47%51%50%

55%58%55%

44%56%55%

49%66%50%

31%40%47%

34%57%34%

52%54%53%

45%46%47%

32%40%39%

43%54%57%

44%52%49%

45%52%55%

51%58%51%

24%52%50%

53%63%57%

All LINs IF ALL UNITS WERE RETURNED HOME against current requirements: AVG = 56%

47%56%52%

53%61%54%

56%70%52%

41%44%43%

53%72%57%

55%59%60% 45%

47%53%

52%59%58%

51%54%50%

48%50%56%

43%47%54%

55%61%57%

42%47%50%

55%57%50%

50%54%45%

57%58%67%

61%75%57%

50%52%51%

32%35%33%

54%72%59%

47%53%44%

60%61%64%

Critical Dual Use LINs against current requirements: AVG = 53%

Updated Semi-AnnuallyPOC: LTC Carolyn Olson 703-607-7475 *As of 2 May 07

Army National Guard

Information as of 2 May 2007

Capability PercentAviation 50%Chemical 52%Cmd & Control 34%Engineers 51%Logistics 54%Maintenance 46%Medical 62%Security 59%Signal 54%Transportation 55%

Army National Guard Essential-10 Equipment Available to Governors for HLD

ND

KY

VI

MI

OHINIL

WI

MN

IANE

TX

OK

KSMO

AR

LA

NM

ORID

MT

WYSD

CA

NV UT

AZ

CO

GUHI

FL

GA

SC

NCTN

MS AL

PA

ME

NHVT

NY

NJ

WVVA

CT

RI

MA

DE

MD

DC

PR

Air National Guard Equipment Available to Governors for HLDAvailable Total ANG Equipment

AVGAll States

AK

0 – 64% 65 - 84% 85 - 100%

WA

96%86%

92%

85%

93%

89%

63%

88%

91%

95%

86%

89%

95%

85%

89% 83%

87% 81%

94%

77%

89%

88%

77%

93%

95%

83%

96%

89%

83%

91%

80%

92%

85%

90%

78%

86%

75%

91%

79%

84%

65%

92%

96%

73%

92%

85% 78%

95%

71%

85%

60%

84%

75%

95%

As of 17 Sep 07

Capability PercentAviation SE 84%Command and Control 96%Communications 92%Engineers 82%Logistics 70%Maintenance 93%Medical 91%Security 84%Vehicles 90%

Air National Guard Essential-10 Equipment Available to Governors for HLD

Available Total ANG Equipment

As of 17 Sep 07

Army National Guard

The 2 ½ Ton Truck Story

SERIES MODELMAINTENANCE

EXPENDITURE LIMIT (MEL)

PLANNING PRICE

(FEDLOG)AVERAGE

AGEM44 M35 $0 $0 41

M44A1 M35A1 $0 $0 40M44A2 M35A2 $12,546.60 $41,822 37M44A3 M35A3 $37,855.00 $56,500 11

M35 TOTAL On-Hand = 10,132

LIN Nomenclature

Req

uire

d

OH

Prim

eIn

vent

ory

2 1/

2's

used

as

Subs

(Not

Dee

med

Su

itabl

e)

OH

Usi

ng L

MTV

+ 2

1/

2's

% F

ill U

sing

2 1

/2 a

s Su

bs

% F

ill P

rime

Onl

y

T60081 MODERN 2 1/2T TRUCK: 4X4 LMTV W/E 8,510 2,472 2,426 4898 58% 29%T60149 MODERN 2 1/2T TRUCK 4X4 LMTV W/E 1,012 283 402 685 68% 28%T93484 MODERN 2 1.2T Truck: LMTV W/E 612 100 17 117 19% 16%

TOTALS 10,134 2,855 2,845 5,700 56% 28%

•How turn-in of 2 ½’s impacts EOH for the LMTV…

•2 ½ Ton trucks are old, have little actual value & minimal maintenance expenditure limits