characterizing product-service systems in the healthcare industry (picmet 2014)
TRANSCRIPT
Characterizing Product-Service Systems (PSS) in the Healthcare Industry
Authors: Man Hang Yip, Robert Phaal, David R. Probert Centre for Technology Management, Department of
Engineering, University of Cambridge, U.K.
Presentation by Man Hang Yip at PICMET’14 at Kanazawa, Japan July 30, 2014
Content
• Motivations & objectives • Literature highlights
• The ‘PSS Characterization Approach’ in brief • The implications of this approach
• Conclusions • Limitations
2 Yip, M.H. © 2014
Motivations & objectives
3
$ £€ €
;)
Hospital Healthcare service effectiveness
How and what to innovate?
A new PSS characterization scheme to support the early stage new PSS development process
Manufacturers
Yip, M.H. © 2014
Literature highlights – P, S, and PSS
4
A service cannot be stocked without losing its identity and requires both producer and consumer; hence is constrained by time and location (Hill, 1999).
A product “exists independently of its owner and preserves its identity through time” (Hill, 1999, pp. 437), and can be intangible (e.g. a digital sound track).
Product, Service, and PSS
A PSS is a combination of products and services, jointly fulfilling a user’s needs (Goedkoop, van Halan, te Riele, & Rommens, 1999)
PSS classification
Frequently used: product-oriented, use-oriented, and result-oriented, which was extended to include integration-oriented and service-oriented (Neely, 2009) Issues: built using the traditional reference of product being tangible, and the classifications are more useful for business modelling than for new PSS development
Yip, M.H. © 2014
Literature highlights – contextual influence
5
From business ecosystem literature – companies to look beyond the ‘extended enterprise’ boundary to include government, regulatory bodies, competitors, and other stakeholders’ interests (Moore, 2006)
Context
From actor-network theory – provides the theoretical basis to allow connections among actors, that includes both human and non-human, to be brought out and examined through ‘flattening’ levels and placing actors side-by-side (Latour, 2005; Law, 1992)
From value-in-use literature – Service-Dominant Logic urges companies to focus on customer value and proposes the concept that the context of value creation is network of networks (Vargo & Lusch, 2004; 2008)
Yip, M.H. © 2014
The PSS Characterization Approach (in brief)
6
Step 4: PSS Representation
Step 1: PSS Depiction
Step 5: PSS Characterisation
Step 3: PSS Decomposition
Step 2: PSS Abstract
Representation
Company’s strategy on new product and service
Step 0: Stakeholder identification
Yip, M.H. © 2014
The Four PSS Characteristics: - potential customer perceived value level - type and degree of connectivity - connectivity number - PSS configuration type
The implications of this approach
8
PSS Definition
Customer value
Environmental impact
Product & service content
Strategy for NPSSD
Process for NPSSD
Yip, M.H. © 2014
The applicability of this approach to support the early stage of NPSSD
9
Applicability Findings
Feasibility Stakeholder identification & PSS abstraction steps could possibly be completed without a trained facilitator
Usability Needs refinement, but the approach is robust enough to be applied in different scenarios
Utility • Useful for identifying stakeholders, relevant existing and new product and service elements for the new PSS
• Encouraged participants to think about which element within the PSS potentially more valued by the customers
• Meaningfully showed how the product and service elements interact within the PSS, and how they are to connect with the operating environment
Yip, M.H. © 2014
Conclusions
10
Is an applicable approach to
support the early stage of NPSSD.
Allows the four PSS characteristics to be obtained in a systematic and repeatable manner.
Clarifies the PSS definition: 1) What do the customer
value? 2) How does it impact the
environment? Who are the key stakeholders?
3) What are the more important elements, how do they interact?
Informs the NPSSD strategy and process: 4) Where does the complexity of the development come from? 5) What is the main focus, what is supplementary?
Yip, M.H. © 2014
Limitations
11
After this paper was written … 7 more workshops targeting new PSS ideas in both healthcare and non-healthcare were completed. An independent observer was used in three workshops to enrich the assessment of the approach.
The PSS characteristics proposed are generated from healthcare cases, and may be limited to NPSSD in the healthcare industry only. Only three workshop results are included in this paper for producing the assessment of the applicability of the PSS characterization approach and its implications to the PSS definition. As action research is used as the methodology, the feasibility of the approach is influenced by the facilitation skills of the researcher. The interpretation of the workshop findings is biased by the researcher’s culture, background, and knowledge of the PSS in discussion.
Yip, M.H. © 2014
Yip, M.H. © 2014 12
If you are interested in this paper, it is in the PICMET’2014 conference proceeding. The title of the paper is: Characterizing Product-Service Systems in the Healthcare Industry
Suggested reference to this presentation: Yip, M. H. (2014). Characterizing Product-Service Systems (PSS) in the Healthcare Industry [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from http://www.shlideshare.net/pss-characterisation-presentation-post-presentation