chapter - v marketing of milk by madurai district co...
TRANSCRIPT
160
CHAPTER - V
MARKETING OF MILK BY MADURAI DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE
MILK PRODUCERS' UNION LTD
5.1 INTRODUCTION
Milk being perishable commodity needs to have an effective and efficient
marketing system. An efficient and effective marketing system minimizes the cost
of marketing services and ensures the largest share of consumers price to the
producers. The quality produce should be provided to the consumers at reasonable
price. But the presence of the intermediaries in the channel of milk marketing and
distribution not only works against the managerial skill of milk producers but also
decreases the marketing efficiency. For the development of the dairy industry, it is
necessary to know the marketing margin, and price spread of milk which may help
to explore the possibilities of reducing marketing costs and margins for the welfare
of the producers and consumers.
5.2 MARKETING CHANNELS
A schematic diagram of milk marketing channels in India is presented in
Figure 1. Eighty per cent of milk is marketed through the highly fragmented un-
organized sector, which includes local milk vendors, wholesalers, retailers, and
producers themselves. On the other hand, the organized dairy industry, which
accounts for about 20 percent of total milk production, comprises two sectors:
government and co-operatives. Even though co-operatives provide a remunerative
price to the producer, the unorganized sector plays a major role in milk marketing
because of three factors.
161
The first factor is the pricing policy of the co-operatives: their purchase
price is based on the fat content of the milk, whereas the private sector pays a flat
rate per liter of milk. The second factor, which motivates the milk producers to sell
milk to private vendors, involves the type of milk animals reared by the producer.
Crossbred cows yield more milk with a lower fat than do buffalo. The crossbred
cow population has increased over the years because of management practices. The
third factor is payment policy. The private sector can pay their producers everyday,
whereas the co-operatives pay weekly or fortnightly. Producers sometimes have to
fight with the co-operatives to get their payments.
Within the organized sector, the co-operative sector is by far the largest in
terms of volumes of milk handled, installed processing capacities, and marketing
infrastructure. The eighty-two thousand Dairy Co-operative Societies (DCSs)
across the countries have a strong membership of nearly 10 million landless,
marginal, and smallholder milk-producer families. Although the organized sector
handles less than 20 percent of the production, it has an installed capacity to
process about 33 percent of India’s total milk production. Much of the processing
capacity created by the private sector in the wake of the liberalization of the Indian
economy in 1991 remains idle; only about 60 percent of the installed capacity of
the private sector is operated on a day-to-day basis. In the government sector, too,
most of the primary processing facilities installed in rural areas (mainly milk-
chilling centers) are not functional and dairy plants in the smaller towns and cities
are grossly under-utilized. In the co-operative sector, all plants are used to their full
capacity and remain under-utilized only during the lean production season.
162
FIGURE 5.1
MILK-MARKETING CHANNELS IN INDIA
The marketing of milk channels may vary from place to place. The
following three prominent milk distribution channels have been identified in the
study area. They are as follows;
163
CHANNEL I
Producer
Milk Producer
Society
Milk
Producer’s
Union
Consumer
The first channel consists of producer – Milk Society – Milk Producer’s
Union – Consumer. The Madurai District Co-operative Milk Producer’s union
Limited has many societies at various blocks. Ten societies were selected for the
sample on the basis of the highest volume of milk procurement.
CHANNEL II
Producer Private Milk Agency Consumer
This channel of distribution is also similar to the first channel but it is
owned by private people. The private society may be a registered or an
unregistered body. These kinds of societies collect fees from the members,
distribute loan to the members for purchasing milch animal or feed with the help of
government. The members are asked to bring their milch animals to the society for
milking from 2 a.m to 5.a.m and from 2 p.m to 5 p.m. The value of pooled milk is
credited in the member’s books of accounts, and they receive payment once a week
or once a fortnight after the recovery of a portion of loan and interest amount.
Various schemes are being provided by the private milk agencies to their
members such as giving incentives according to milk turnover per farm,
distributing prizes and conducting tours in order to motivate the milk producers.
The veterinary services are also provided to all milch animals owned by the
members, once in a month. Artificial insemination is also provided at free of cost.
164
The private milk agencies sell the milk which is collected from the
producers in two ways. They are (i) through their depots at various places and
(ii) through their workers. The consumers get two types of services from the
society. The society issues pre-paid milk cards and the milk is collected by the
consumer at the milk depots of the society.
Another type of service is that the society engages workers to deliver milk
at the consumer’s house after collecting the pre-paid milk coupons. Sometimes
milk is sold for cash also. But the priority is given to the coupon holders.
CHANNEL III
Producer Milk Vendor Consumer
The marketing of milk in the third channel is through milk vendors which is
very popular in the study area. Most of the milk vendors are either single persons
or a group of two or more persons. They go to the milk producer’s house directly
and collect milk, two times a day between 2 a.m – 5. a.m and 2 p.m – 5 p.m. The
mode of transportation is either bicycles or motorcycles. Generally each of them
covers 50 to 60 households. The collected milk is sold to the consumers and if
there is any surplus it is given to tea stalls. The money settlement for milk
delivered will be once in a week or daily. Producers are sometimes given advance
amount by the vendors and advance paid is adjusted at the time of settlement.
165
The major activity of the Madurai District Co-operative Milk Producers'
Union Ltd is to procure milk from the farmer members of the Districts and also to
provide necessary technical input facility to them. The procurement is carried out
by forming village level Milk Producers’ Cooperative Societies. The main
objective of the organization is to give good remunerative price to the milk
producing farmers of the Madurai and Theni District, to supply good quality milk
to the consumers of Madurai and Theni city at a reasonable price and to assured,
round the year procurement of milk from the farmer members of this Union.
5.3 PROCUREMENT OF MILK
The Madurai District Co-operative Milk Producers' Union Ltd Procurement
of milk from members is based on quality of the milk. The poured milk is tested
for its Fat and Solid Non Fat% content. Based on the quantity poured and on the
quality ( contents of Fat% and SNF%), payment to the producers are made.
Present procurement price to society is Rs.108.30 / Kg. of total solids. The milk
procurement is carried out through formation of Village level Coop Societies. It
convinces the farmers to pour milk to Co-operative to fetch higher price. It assured
year round milk collection from the societies’ door step by milk collection routes.
It educates the farmers on Animal management, infertility and feeding
management. The procurement price is calculated and given to the farmers based
on the chemical quality of milk i.e. Fat and Solid Non Fat. Payments to the
producers are effected once in 10 days by the Union . Monthly payment comes
nearly 9crores to the rural villages.
166
5.4 MILK PROCUREMENT AND INPUT INFORMATION:
The milk procurement and input information of the Madurai District Co-
operative Milk Producers' Union Ltd are presented below;
1. No of Milk Collection Routes : 22
2. No of Milk Producers' Societies (Functional) : 639
3. Average Milk Procurement per day : 1,20,000 lits
4. Total no of milk producers : 1,22,019
5. No of societies having A.I. facility : 224
6. No of mobile veterinary routes operated : 9
7. No of Emergency veterinary route operated : 1
8. Cattle feed marketed per month : 70.324 metric tonnes
9. Average Milk Sales per day : 76000 lts.
10. Total No of City Milk Distribution Routes : 15
11. Total No of Rural Milk Distribution Routes : 5
12. Milk Procurement Teams Functioning : 9 they are
a) Vadipatty
b) Melur
c) Usilampatti
d) Tirumangalam
e) Chellampatti
f) Kallupatti
g) Andipatti
h) Theni
i) Uthamapalayam
167
5.5 DAIRY PLANT INFORMATIONS:
The dairy plant information of the Madurai District Co-operative Milk
Producers' Union Ltd are presented below;
1) Installed Milk Handling Capacity: 1.5 lakh lits per day
2) Milk Powder Plant Capacity: 10 metric tonnes per day
3) Butter Production Capacity: 10 metric tonnes per day
4) Ghee Production Capacity: 5 metric tonnes per day
5.6 PRODUCTS MANUFACTURED:
The products manufactured by the Madurai District Co-operative Milk
Producers' Union Ltd are
1. Market milk,
2. Butter, Ghee,
3. Skimmilk Powder,
4. Sterilized Flavoured Milk,
5. Khoa,
6. Mysore Pa,
7. Curd.
5.7 MARKETING DEPARTMENT DETAILS:
The marketing department details of the Madurai District Co-operative
Milk Producers' Union Ltd are presented below;
1) Total Number of Milk Selling Booths : 324
2) Total Number of Parlours : 20
3) Total Number of Milk Marketing Zones : 5
168
5.8 TECHNICAL INPUT AND SERVICES OFFERED
The union offers the following technical input and services
1. Free veterinary healthcare to animals of the producer members of this
organisation. This service is provided by operating 8 Nos. of Mobile
veterinary routes covering 420 Societies in the District. The veterinarians
visit the societies at a scheduled time, every week and treat the animals in
the village itself.
2. Free De worming of all calves.
3. Emergency veterinary service on call at a reasonable charge of
Rs 25.00 per visit even to remote village.
4. Door step Artificial Insemination service in 503 villages.
5. Supply of cattle feed at a reasonable price.
6. Bull production programme by selecting good quality cows and
inseminating with a proven bull and the expected male calf is
selected for semen production. The farmer is given good price
for his male calf.
7. Progeny testing scheme.
8. Arranging of loans from nationalized banks to purchase
animals.
5.9 TRAINING CENTRE: The union is running a training centre to train the
society level employees as well as the farmers. The training programmes
conducted are;
1. AI & FA Training - 30 days
2. UDC Secretary Training - 30 days
3. Milk Tester Training - 5 days
4. UDC Refresher Training - 5 days
5. BMC Training - 5 days
6. AI Refresher Training - 5 days
7. MACom Training - 5 days
8. CMP Training - 3 days (DCS employees)
9. CMP Training - 2 days ( Members )
10. Farmers Orientation Programme - 1 day
11. Dairy Animal Management Training - 2 days
169
5.10 QUALITY CONTROL LABORATORY
Quality control in the Dairy Industry is essential to ensure that the
consumer, the ultimate recipient of the products gets them in an acceptable
condition without adulteration of any kind and thereby safeguarding their health
and aesthetic sense.
The Quality Control laboratory in Madurai Dairy is equipped to analyse
and evaluate the quality of milk and milk products both chemically and
bacteriologically. A system of quality checking has been drawn up and followed at
every stages of production, processing, storage and marketing with a view to
assess and improve the quality in conformity with the stipulated standards laid
down in “Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, Indian Standard Institution”.
Agmark and weights and measure Act.
The milk on its receipt from the various cooperative societies is accepted
by screening organoleptically (colour taste flavour etc.) and subjected to chemical
and bacteriological analysis. As we make payment on the basis of quality, milk
from each source is tested for its fat and solid non fat content. In respect of
Buffalo milk, the payment is made on the basis of kilo fat and for cow milk on
total solids basis.
The raw milk reception is computerized and the farmers are made known,
the milk rate and Quantity of milk supplied on the next day itself. The milk cost
payment is also done by computerised billing to avoid delay. The bulk raw and
pasteurized milk from chilling center and other Districts are subjected to
Metheyline Blue Reduction test to assess the hygienic quality and keeping quality
in addition to the fat and SNF, Acidity, Roselic Acid test (for Neutralizer) etc.
170
If the quality of incoming milk is found to be poor, the fact is being
immediately brought to the notice of the production personnel to take immediate
steps to process the milk in priority and informed the source concerned to take
immediate remedial measures to rectify the problem.
The milk thus received is pasteurized, Homogenized standardized and
packed for marketing. During these stages, series of quality check is being carried
out to check the efficiency of the pasteurization Homogenization correctness of the
standard and its keeping quality.
The various by products like butter, skimmed milk powder, ghee, butter
milk, curd, flavored sterilized milk, khoa, mysorepa and Aavin Jamun are
subjected to strict quality control checks at different levels of production and
storage and all concerted efforts are being taken to ensure that the products thus
manufactured confirm to the standards prescribed by the prevention of food
adulteration act, Indian Standard and Agmark.
In addition to this, the strength of Acid and detergents used for cleaning,
boiler feed water, packing materials such as cartons, tins etc., cleaning efficiency
of cans, storage tanks and other equipments, temperature of deep freezes, cold
room are being checked at periodical intervals and reported to the concerned for
taking remedial measures.
The packed milk (sachets) and the market milk are tested for there quality
and other chemical components. Madurai Aavin Milk has been tested at CFTRI
(Centre for Food Technology Research Institute) for the residuals of pesticides,
heavy metals and Aflatoxin and the certificate shows that they are all below the
detectable limit.
171
5.11 MICROBIOLOGICAL TESTS:
Milk is an excellent medium for the growth of bacteria. To protect
consumers from the undesirable pathogens, various inspections and checks are
being carried out to ensure bacteriologically safe milk supply. The hygienic
production, processing, storage is always given primary importance and results are
being communicated to production personnel for complete safety of our products
from the Public Health point of view. Some of the bacteriological tests that are
being conducted are given below;-
a. Standard plate count (primary test for quality of milk).
b. Coliform Bacteria (Post pasteurization contamination presence of these
bacteria in pasteurized milk products is suggestive of in sanitary conditions or
practices during production processing or storage).
c. Yeast and mold count.
d. Rinse or swab test to judge the cleaning efficiency etc.
5.12 AVERAGE COLLECTION OF MILK BY SOCIETIES
The average collection of milk collected by the sample societies in the
study area is shown in table 5.1
TABLE 5.1
AVERAGE COLLECTION OF MILK BY SOCIETIES
S.No Quantity of milk collected (in
liters per day)
No. milk producer
society %
01 Below 1000 03 30.00
02 1000 – 2000 04 40.00
03 2000 - 3000 02 20.00
05 Above 3000 01 10.00
Total 10 100.00
Source: Primary data
172
Table 5.1 shows the average collection of milk collected per day by sample
societies. It is understood from the table that 40 per cent of the sample societies
collect 1000 – 2000 liters per day followed by 30 per cent of societies which
collects below 1000 liters of milk per day. 20 per cent of the societies procure
milk between 2000 to 3000 liters per day and 10 per cent of the societies procure
milk above 3000 litres. Table indicates that 70 per cent of the societies collect milk
more than 1000 liters per day.
5.13 REASONS FOR SELLING MILK TO SOCIETIES
To analyze the reasons for selling milk to milk producer’s societies, the
respondents were assigned a list of predetermined reasons. They were asked to
rank the reasons according to their perception. To find out the important reason
among the given, the Garrett’s Ranking Technique was adopted. The information
given by the respondents was converted into ranks by using the formula of
Garrett’s ranking method.
n
Per cent position = Σ [ (Rij - 0.5) / Nj ] × 100 …(1)
j=1
Where,
Rij = Rank given for the ith item by the jth individual, and
Nj = Number of items ranked by the jth individual.
By the use of the above formula, the mean scores were obtained and the
ranks were provided according to the mean score.
173
5.14 REASONS FOR THE PREFERENCE OF MILK SOCIETY AS
MIDDLEMAN
To avoid the exploitation by the middlemen in the marketing of milk, milk
societies were started. They aim at greater price to the producer and lesser price to
the consumer. But the respondent’s perceptions about the societies are different.
These are analyzed through Garrett’s Ranking Technique. The results are given in
table 5. 2
TABLE 5.2
REASONS FOR SELLING MILK TO MILK PRODUCER’S SOCIETY
S.No Reasons Mean score Rank
01 Regular Payment 74.12 I
02 Better Price 55.98 VII
03 Regular uptake 69.47 III
04 Conventional practice 66.21 IV
05 Problem with milk vendors 64.22 V
06 Absence of other milk agencies 62.89 VI
07 Loan facility 68.87 II
Source: Primary data
Table 5.2 shows that the first reason for selling milk to the society by
respondents is the disbursement of payment regularly and the second reason is the
possibility availing loan facility. The third and fourth reasons for selecting milk
societies are regular uptake and conventional practice. Problems with the milk
vendors, absence of other milk agencies and better price are the fifth, sixth and
seventh reasons for the selection of milk societies by the milk producers in the
study area.
174
In order to find out whether there is any significant difference between
opinion of the respondents about the reasons for selecting milk societies and their
individual demographic variables, such as age, marital status, family size,
educational status, income, herd strength and landholding pattern of the
respondents, a null hypothesis is framed and tested with the help of chi-square test.
Null Hypothesis:
There is no significant difference between opinion of the respondents about
the reasons for selecting milk societies and their individual demographic
variables, such as age, marital status, family size, educational status, income, herd
strength and landholding pattern of the respondents.
Alternate Hypothesis:
There is a significant difference between opinion of the respondents about
the reasons for selecting milk societies and their individual demographic
variables, such as age, marital status, family size, educational status, income, herd
strength and landholding pattern of the respondents.
The result is given in table 5.3
175
TABLE 5.3
CHI-SQUARE TEST RESULT
Variable Perception Calculated
value
Table
value (0.05
level)
Result
Age
Regular Payment
24.67 36.42 Not Significant
Marital status 11.86 12.59 Not Significant
Family size 31.25 28.87 Significant
Educational
status 18.57 21.03 Not Significant
Income, 23.94 21.03 Significant
Herd strength 26.86 21.03 Not Significant
Landholding
pattern 38.23 36.42 Not Significant
Age
Better Price
31.56 36.42 Not Significant
Marital status 10.31 12.59 Not Significant
Family size 25.89 28.87 Not Significant
Educational
status 19.34 21.03
Not Significant
Income, 18.39 21.03 Not Significant
Herd strength 19.21 21.03 Not Significant
Landholding
pattern 32.83 36.42 Not Significant
Age
Regular uptake
34.25 36.42 Not Significant
Marital status 10.84 12.59 Not Significant
Family size 26.91 28.87 Not Significant
Educational
status 19.56 21.03 Not Significant
Income, 18.74 21.03 Not Significant
Herd strength 17.22 21.03 Not Significant
Landholding
pattern 33.57 36.42 Not Significant
Age
Conventional practice
38.61 36.42 Significant
Marital status 15.97 12.59 Significant
Family size 31.23 28.87 Significant
Educational
status 19.51 21.03 Not Significant
Income, 17.39 21.03 Not Significant
Herd strength 18.27 21.03 Not Significant
Landholding
pattern 32.68 36.42 Not Significant
Age
Problem with milk
vendors
31.27 36.42 Not Significant
Marital status 10.59 12.59 Not Significant
Family size 26.37 28.87 Not Significant
Educational
status 24.38 21.03 Significant
Income, 17.69 21.03 Not Significant
Herd strength 18.23 21.03 Not Significant
176
Landholding
pattern 32.45 36.42 Not Significant
Age
Absence of other milk
agencies
32.17 36.42 Not Significant
Marital status 11.38 12.59 Not Significant
Family size 23.64 28.87 Not Significant
Educational
status 20.35 21.03 Not Significant
Income, 19.12 21.03 Not Significant
Herd strength 18.91 21.03 Not Significant
Landholding
pattern 34.76 36.42 Not Significant
Age
Loan facility
38.26 36.42 Significant
Marital status 17.65 12.59 Significant
Family size 31.28 28.87 Significant
Educational
status 23.69 21.03
Significant
Income, 26.48 21.03 Significant
Herd strength 25.37 21.03 Significant
Landholding
pattern 39.52 36.42
Significant
Computed by the researcher
Table 5.3 shows that there is no significant difference between perception
of the respondents about reasons of regular payment, for selecting a milk society
and Age, Marital status, Educational status, Herd strength, Landholding pattern
except Family size and Income of the respondents.
There is no significant difference between perception of the respondents
about the reasons of better price, regular uptake and absence of other milk agencies
for selecting milk society and age, marital status, family size, educational status,
income, herd strength and landholding pattern of the respondents.
There is a significant difference between perception of the respondents
about the reasons of conventional practice for selecting milk society and Age,
Marital status, and Family size. However there is no significant difference between
the perception and Educational status, Income, Herd strength and Landholding
pattern of the respondents
177
There is no significant difference between perception of the respondents
about the reasons of Problem with milk vendors for selecting milk society and
age, marital status, family size, income, herd strength and landholding pattern
except educational status of the respondents.
There is a significant difference between perception of the respondents
about the reasons Loan facility offered by the milk societies for selecting milk
society and Age, Marital status, and Family size, Educational status, Income, Herd
strength and Landholding pattern of the respondents.
5.15 MARKETING COST AND MARKETING MARGIN
The expenditure incurred by the middlemen from the stage of procurement
of milk to the sale of milk to the ultimate consumer is marketing cost. It is the
difference between the consumer’s price and the net price received by the producer
plus the marketing margin. It is measured as under.
Marketing Cost = Consumer price – Net price received by producer (when
there is no middleman)
Marketing Cost = Consumer’s price – Net price received by the producer +
margin of the middleman
The difference between the consumer price and the marketing cost along
with the producer’s price is the marketing margin.
5.7 CONCEPTS USED IN MARKETING COST
(i) Procurement Price:
The actual price received by the milk producer or which is given by the
society to the producer is procurement price. The average procurement price of
cows and buffalo’s is taken in to account for calculating the marketing cost.
178
(ii) Procurement Cost
This cost includes the expenditure on the salaries of team officers, field
assistants and cost of chemicals used to test the purity of milk. Procurement cost
is the cost which includes the expenses for the procurement of milk from the
producers.
(iii) Input Cost
Input cost is incurred on the veterinary doctor’s visits to various
households. This is applicable only to the co-operative union members. For others,
it is included in the cost of production of milk because the amount is spent by the
producer himself.
(iv) Chilling Cost
Milk, which is collected in a nearby village, has to be chilled before
bringing it to the union. The cost incurred for chilling is termed as chilling cost.
This cost concept is applicable only to the society/union.
(v) Collection Cost
The cost incurred for collecting milk from the societies is called collection
cost.
(vi) Tanker Transport Cost
The tanker transport cost is the cost involved in bringing the chilled milk to
the dairy union or plant at Madurai. It is applicable only to channel I.
(vii) Processing Cost
Dairy milk has to be processed immediately as its period of life is only six
hours. The cost involved in processing is called processing cost. This cost exists
only in channel I.
179
(viii) Skimming Cost
The cost involved in separating fat from the milk is called skimming cost.
This cost exists only in channel I.
(ix) Skimmed Milk Powder Cost
To maintain the standard of milk, milk powder is added. Skimmed milk
powder cost means the cost of milk powder that is added to the milk. This cost
exists only in Channel I.
(x) Packing cost
The milk is supplied by can, bottle or tetra pack. The cost of packing
material and labour is called the packing cost. This cost exists only in Channel I.
(xi) Administrative Cost
The cost incurred to maintain the staff, office stationery and the like related
to the office administration is called the administrative cost.
(xii) Distribution Cost
Distribution cost includes the salesman’s commission and the transport
cost for the distribution of milk to various depots.
5.16 COST OF MILK COLLECTION
Milk society procures milk from the producer and sells it to the union. The
union procures the milk from the societies and sells it to the consumers after
processing it. The total costs of milk collection from Milk society to the union
are divided under the following sub heads:
(a) Charges borne by the milk co-operative society.
(c) Charges borne by the Union.
180
Their marketing cost and margin are shown in table 5.4.
5.17 CHARGES BORNE BY MILK CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
The charges borne by the milk co-operative societies are given in table 5.4
TABLE- 5.4
CHARGES BORNE BY MILK CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (RS.)
S.No Particulars Rs. / Litre Percentage
01 Procurement price 15.50 65.96
02 Staff overhead charges 0.29 01.23
03 Room rent 0.21 0.89
04 Electricity charges 0.12 0.51
05 Stationery charges 0.15 0.64
06 Miscellaneous charges 0.10 0.43
07 Cost of milk at society 16.37 69.66
08 Price paid by the milk
producer’s union
16.66 70.89
09 Net margin to society 0.29 1.23
Source: Primary data
From the table 5.4, it has been inferred that at the milk producer’s society,
the procurement price forms the major components of the charges borne by the co-
operative society and it constitutes 65.96 per cent of the consumer’ price followed
by Staff overhead charges of 01.23 per cent, Room rent 0.89 per cent, electricity
charges 0.51 per cent, Stationery charges 0.64 per cent, and Miscellaneous charges
0.43 per cent of the consumer’ price. The average total cost borne by the milk
producer’s society is 69.66 per cent of the average consumer price. The price paid
by the milk producer’s union to the milk producer’s society is Rs. 16.66 per liter.
The net margin of profit to the society is Rs. 0.29 per litre.
181
5.18 CHARGES BORNE BY MILK PRODUCER’S UNION
The charges borne by the milk producer’s union are given in table 5.5
TABLE - 5.5
CHARGES BORNE BY MILK PRODUCER’S UNION (RS.)
S.No Particulars Rs. / Litre Percentage
01 Procurement price 16.66 70.89
02 Procurement cost 0.08 0.34
03 Input cost 0.19 0.81
04 Chilling cost 0.16 0.68
05 Collection cost 0.14 0.60
06 Tanker transport cost 0.27 01.15
07 Processing cost 0.31 01.32
08 Cost of milk 17.81 75.79
09 Skimming cost 0.10 0.43
10 Skimmed milk powder cost 0.16 0.68
11 Packing cost 0.70 02.98
12 Administrative cost 0.79 03.36
13 Distribution cost 0.37 14.34
14 Cost of milk 19.93 84.81
15 Profit by removing fat 0.42 01.79
16 Total margin to milk
producer’s union
3.15 13.40
17 Consumer price 23.50 100.00
Source: Primary data
182
Table 5.5 shows the various cost borne by the milk producer’s union in the
study area. Among the various marketing cost incurred, administration cost is
found to be high which constitute Rs. 0.79 per litre followed by packing cost
Rs. 0.70 per litre and skimming cost Rs. 0.10 per litre, processing cost Rs. 0.31 per
litre, Tanker transport cost Rs. 0.27 per litre, Input cost Rs. 0.19 per liter Chilling
cost Rs. 0.16 per litre and procurement cost Rs. 0.08 per litre respectively.
Hence the cost of milk in the channel comes to Rs. 19.93, that is 84.81 per cent of
the consumer’s price. The cost of milk at the producer’s union plus profit by
removing fat and margin of the milk producer’s union result in the consumer’s
price of Rs. 23.50 per litre in this channel.
5.19 PRICE – SPREAD
The difference between the net price received by the producer and the
consumer’s price is price spread. Since there is small variation in consumer price
only the average price is calculated.
By finding the difference between the net price received by the producer
from the societies and the price paid by the consumer, the price spread is worked
out.
The price spread in the channel I that is milk sold through co-operative
societies is shown in table 5.6
183
TABLE 5.6
PRICE SPREAD IN THE MARKETING OF MILK THROUGH CO-
OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
S.No Particulars Rs. Percentage
01 Producer price 15.50 65.96
02 Marketing margin 3.15 13.40
03 Marketing cost 3.98 16.94
04 Consumer price 23.50 100.00
05 Price spread 08.00 -
Source: Primary data
From table 5.6, it has been revealed a sum of Rs.8.00 per litre of price
spread that is difference between producer price and consumer price. The
marketing margin of the milk producer’s union is Rs.3.15 per litre and the average
total marketing cost is Rs. 3.98 per litre of milk. It is observed from the table that
milk producers got only 65.96 per cent of share in the consumer price, but their
profit was only Rs. 3.49 per litre that is 14.85 per cent of consumer price in the
marketing of milk.