chapter - i industrial profile of maharashtra...

1

CHAPTER - I

INDUSTRIAL PROFILE OF MAHARASHTRA

INTRODUCTION:

In this chapter, an attempt has been made to present the industrial profile of

Maharashtra. This chapter contains the industrial development of India in relation to

some other select countries, India’s industrial development over the period. Inter State

comparison of industrial progress in order to show industrial disparity. It mainly explains

the industrial development of Maharashtra giving Division-wise & District-wise status

for the purpose of indicating intrastate industrial disparity. This is judged with the help of

select indicators of industrial development such as number of factories, number of

employees, fixed capital, working capital, industrial consumption of electricity and

industrial estates etc.

FORMATION OF MAHARASHTRA:

Maharashtra state consists of four regions viz; Konkan, Western Maharashtra,

Marathawada, and Vidarbha. All these regions were parts of three states, i.e. Bombay

Provision, Madhya Pradesh, & Hyderabad State. 1st November, 1956, they were

combined with Saurashtra to form a part of the composite bilingual Mumbai (1) on 1st

May1960, the composite Mumbai state was bifurcated & the present Maharashtra was

formed as a single sublingual state of the Indian union. (2)

LOCATION OF MAHARASHTRA:

Maharashtra is one of the 30 states of the Indian Union. The state is situated

between 16.40 to 22.10 north latitudes and longitude between 72.60 to 80.90 in the east.

The state is about 800 km. east-west and 700 km. north-south. It has a land area of

3.0777 lakh sq. km. and constitutes about 9.36 percent of all India area of 32.873 lakh sq.

km. It is the third largest state in India in terms of geographical area.

As per 2011 census, Maharashtra is the second largest state in India in case of

population as its population is 11.237 crore which is 9.29 percent share of total

population of India.

The state is bounded by Arabian Sea in the west, Gujarat in the northwest,

Madhya Pradesh in the north, Andhra Pradesh in the south east, Karnataka & Goa in the

2

South. The Konkan coastal stretches about 720 km. long in the west and the Sahyadri

ranges parallel to the sea coast at about 80 km. wide in the east. It comprises three

natural parts- the narrow coastal low land of Konkan, the sahyadries and Deccan plateau.

The State has 35 districts, divided in to six revenue divisions. They are Konkan,

Pune, Nashik, Aurangabad, Amravati and Nagpur. Mumbai is the state capital and

Nagpur is the seasonal venue of state Legislature. Ahmadnagar is the largest and Greater

Mumbai is the smallest district in the state.

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT IN INDIA:

While reading industrial profile of Maharashtra, it is pertinent to study the

industrial development of India. In India, industry is the second biggest source of income

after service sector. India has been striving for industrial development particularly since

independence of the country through different five years plans. During the plan period,

India has been witnessing industrial development by setting up a diversified structure.

Indian union Government & state Governments are making special efforts for industrial

development by adopting several policy measures such as incentive plans formation of

supporting institutions like banks, financial institutions, infrastructure facilities for

provision of in infrastructure facilities etc.

The industrial development of India is to be viewed from the period prior to

independence. From this point of view, the history of industrial development of India is

to consider into two periods as pre-independence period & post independence period.

PRE – INDEPENDENCE PERIOD:

In mid nineteenth century, the economy of India was self – sufficient as small and

cottage industries were meeting the local needs. These industries were satisfying the

primary needs of village people. Then there were no adequate transport facilities

available because of lack of infrastructure facilities, industries were organized in tiny &

small size & they were catering to the local needs only.

There had been British Rule in India for the period of 150 years. During this

period, the British Government remained silent spectator & did not pay need to the

industrial activities in the country. In this period, India was a merely raw material

exporting nation. This resulted in non-development of industrial activities in the country.

Then Government no doubt made some symbolic efforts such as the appointment of the

3

industrial commission in 1916, Fiscal commission in 1921 etc. No plan with any policy

was with the British Government for industrial development of India. The first cotton

textile started in 1854, Jute mill in 1855, coal mining in 1972, Railways in 1854 & Steel

plant 1907.

POST INDEPENDENCE PERIOD:

For economic development, industrialization was recognized & accepted as an

important part of planning in India after independence, for this purpose, industrial

infrastructure was developed in some cities. The first industrial policy of India was

declared in 1948 by the Indian Government. Though first & second five year's plans gave

more importance to agriculture, industrialization process was started from the first year

of the first five year plan, i.e. in 1951. Due to the industrial policy of the union

government, the traditional industries in developing stage got a boost & large number of

entrepreneurs in different industries came forward & started their industrial activities.

This created a very atmosphere for increasing industrial activities in the country. The

industrial policy of 1956 brought a real life to corporate sector in our country & large

scale industries emerged on the horizon of India producing variety of goods.

India has been striving for industrial development since independence by

adopting five year plans, several industrial policies & other measurers. No doubt, India

has much achieved in the field of industry. Still, she remakes 51 among the countries in

the world in terms of industrial development. (3) In the beginning five years plan,

importance was laid on traditional and heavy capital goods industries. In these plans, an

attempt was made to use huge labour force & natural resources available in the country.

Since 1991, an industrialization is being achieved in the light of liberalization,

privatization & globalization as a part of new economic policy. Since 1991, successive

governments have carried forward the reforms of new policy in industrial sector,

financial sector, fiscal sector & external sector. Both the central Government & many

state governments have initiated significant procedural & policy reforms to attract

foreign investment and increase domestic private participation in the development of

industries.

4

Review of Post Independence Industrial Development In India:

India is a developing country. Considering over population of India, industrial

development is the most to provide employment to her people for increasing their

income level & living standard. There has been industrial development in a large extent

in developed countries. Considering the experience of the developed countries, India has

also been making planned attempts for industrial development through successive five

years plan & industrial policies, the latest being the New Economic Policy, 1991.

Table No. 1.1

Important Indicators of Industrial Development in I ndia

Indicator 1960-61 1980-81 1990-91 2000-01 2008-09

No. of Factories (in thousands)

42.60 96.50 (127)

110.20 (159)

131.30 (208)

155.32 (265)

Employment (in thousands)

3732 7854 (110)

8163 (119)

7918 (112)

11327 (204)

Fixed Capital (Rs. In crores)

NA 29600 133648 (352)

399604 (1236)

1055966 (3467)

Gross Output (Rs. In crores)

4521 61084 (1251)

270564 (5885)

926902 (20402)

2661486 (57869)

Value Added (Rs. In crores)

1138 11929 (948)

51515 (4427)

143621 (12520)

592114 (51031)

Sources: 1. Industrial Maharashtra, The land of opportunities, Maharashtra Economic Development council, Monthly Economic Digest, June 1993, Mumbai (for 1960-61).

2. Statistical outline of India 2006-07, Taka services limited, Department of Economics & statistics for 1980-81, 1990-91 & 2000-01. 3. Annual survey of Industry for 2008-09. Note: 1. Figures in brackets indicate growth rate. 2. 1960-61 has been assumed as based year except for fixed capital for which 1980-81 taken as base year.

Table 1.1 shows various indicators of industrial development in India for various

periods from 1960-61 to 2008-09 at different point of time.

In terms of number of factories, there was a growth by 265 percent over the

period from 1960-61 to 2008-09. Employment showed a growth by 204 percent fixed

capital by 3467 percent, gross output by 57869 percent and value added by 51031

percent over the period. The growth in factories & employment was not satisfactory and

not in tune with the remaining indicators, but growth in fixed capital was good. Growth

in gross output & value added was tremendous.

5

India’s position vis-à-vis various leading countries in terms of industrial

development. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT:

Table No. 1.2

CIP Index Value of Various Leading Countries for 2000 & 2005 (in Numbers and

Index)

Rank Country or Territory CIP Index Value 2005 2000 2005 2000

1 1 Singapore 0.890 0.887 2 2 Ireland 0.689 0.778 3 3 Japan 0.678 694 4 4 Switzerland 0.659 0.653 5 5 Sweden 0.603 0.593 6 6 Germany 0.602 0.586 7 7 Finland 0.594 0.584 8 8 Belgum 0.583 0.561 9 12 Republic of Korea 0.575 0.528 10 10 Taiwan Province of China 0.555 0.552 52 45 Argentina 0.256 0.266 53 42 Austrelia 0.255 0.281 54 51 India 0.252 0.254 55 55 Mauritius 0.246 0.247 56 57 Georgia 0.245 0.245 120 118 Algeria 0.063 0.083 121 121 Gabon 0.052 0.045 122 122 Ethiopia 0.035 0.044

Source: United Nations Industrial Development Report 2008-09.

Table 1.2 indicates CIP index value of various leading countries for 2000 & 2005

from the table, it is seen that India ranked 51 in 2000 & 54 in 2005. Singapore was at

number one in both years & Ethiopia at last number, i.e. 122 in both years.

It can be concluded that India is improving her position in the world in case of

industrial development as she went up to 54 ranks in 2005 from 51 ranks in 2000 as

shown in table 1.2.

6

Table No. 1.3

Share percentage of Selected Countries inGDP from Industry

(As on 31st March, 2009)

Sr. No.

Country or Territory Percentage Share of GDP from

Industry 1 Singapore 35 2 United Kingdom 24 3 Japan 30 4 USA 23 5 Autreliya 28 6 Germany 30 7 China 48 8 Shri Lanka 27 9 India 29 10 Bangladesh 28

Source: United Nations Industrial Development Report 2008-09 & International

Statistics from TATA Services Ltd.Mumbai.

Table 1.3 and Graph 1.1 Shows share percentage of select countries in GDP from

industry. Singapore was at the top as she had 35 percent share in GDP from industry &

USA at the lowest, In this regard. India had 29 percent share in GDP from industry.

Among the select countries, India had got fairly high position in this regard.

35

24

30

23

2830

48

2729 28

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Sh

are

of

GD

P f

rom

In

du

stry

Country

Graph 1.1

Percentage Share of GDP from Industry

7

INDUSTRIAL PROFILE OF MAHARASHTRA:

Maharashtra is considered as one of the industrial developed states in India.

Maharashtra’s consistent contribution of more than 20% in net value added in the

organized industries sector in the country reflects its high position in industrialization.(4)

Annual survey of industries 1988-89 regarded that Maharashtra continued to be

in the lead in terms of industrial development.(5) The annual survey of industries 2003-04

showed that in the organized industrial sector in the country, Maharashtra contributed

18.5% in gross value of output, 20.65% in net value added, 13.53% in number of

factories, and 12.72% in number of workers employed, 17.6% in fixed capital & 17.2 %

in productive capital.

In 2005-06, the state was at the top by holding 20.1% of the total industrial

investment in the country & it had also got 20% of all foreign investment in the country.

In 2006-07, the state contributed one fifth of the manufacturing GSDP of the all

states of India. According to Annual survey of Industries 2010-11, it is revealed that

amongst the states in India, Maharashtra was at the top position in terms of gross value

added and employments paid to employees with share of 20.5% and 16.4% at all India

level. In case of number of factories, fixed capital and employment, the state was at the

second position in the country with a share of 13.2%, 14.5% & 12.1 % respectively.

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT IN MAHARASHTRA SINCE ITS

FORMATION:

Since the formation of Maharashtra state the Government of Maharashtra has

been making deliberate & planned efforts for industrial development by taking several

steps such as setting up several supporting institutions and adopting different package

schemes of incentives. The general atmosphere in the state is also helping for industrial

development. At the formation of the state, there was a great in the regional industrial

disparity. In order to remove, inter regional disparity, the state Government framed its

industrial policy supporting industrial dispersal and decentralization all over the state

because of such planned & deliberate steps taken, the state has made a spectacular

progress in the filed of industry.

8

An attempt is made to throw light on the industrial development of Maharashtra

with the help of five different indicators for the period from 1960-61 to 2003-04 at

different points of time as shown in table 1.4.

Table No.1.4

Industrial Development in Maharashtra-Number of Workers, Number of

Registered Factories, Fixed Capital Investment, Value Added & Consumption of

Electricity

(From 1960-61 to 2009-10)

Indicator 1960-61 1993-94 2003-04

No. of Workers (No.) 369623 983455 (166) 1051909(185)

No. of working registered

factories (No) 1228 26663(2071) 29637(2313)

Fixed Capital (Rs. In Crores) 95.15 64586(67777) 83472(87626)

Value Added (Rs. In crores) 112 34762(30995) 41910(37390)

Consumption of electricity for industrial use (in KWh crores.

214 1436(571) 20900(877)

Source: The figures have been compiled from statistical abstract of Maharashtra state

1960-61, district socio-Economic Review 1993-94 and 2003-04 and office

record of the directorate of economics & statistics, Govt. of Mahrarashtra,

Mumbai.

Note: 1) Figures in the brackets indicate growth rate.

2) 1960-61 has been assumed as base year.

9

0

200000

400000

600000

800000

1000000

1200000

No. of Workers

(No.)

No.of working

registered

factories (No)

Fixed Capital

(Rs. In Crores)

Value Added

(Rs. In crores)

Consumption of

electricity for

industrial use

(in KWh crores.

Nu

mb

er

oin

C

rore

s, K

WH

& N

o.

Indicators

Graph 1.2.1

Industrial Development in Maharashtra

1960-61

1993-94

2003-04

369623

9834551051909

0

200000

400000

600000

800000

1000000

1200000

1960-61 1993-94 2003-04

Nu

mb

er

of

Wo

rke

rs(N

o.)

Year

Graph 1.2.2

No. of Workers

10

1228

26663

29637

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

1960-61 1993-94 2003-04

Ww

ork

ing

re

gis

tere

d f

acto

rie

s (N

o)

Year

Graph 1.2.3

No.of working Registered Factories

95.15

64586

83472

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

1960-61 1993-94 2003-04

Fix

ed

Ca

pit

al in

Rs.

(In

Cro

res)

Year

Graph 1.2.4

Fixed Capital (Rs. In Crores)

11

It is revealed from the analysis of data as shown in table 1.4 & graph 1.2.1, 1.2.2,

1.2.3, 1.2.4, 1.2.5 & graph 1.2.6 regarding select indicators of industrial development of

Maharashtra for the period from 1960-61 to 2003-04 at three different points of time that

there was a growth in case of each indicator. The number of workers went up by near

about 2 times, number of factories by 23 times, fixed capital by 876 times, value added

by 374 times and consumption of electricity for industrial use by 9 times over the period.

All the indicators except number of workers showed impressive growth.

112

34762

41910

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

45000

1960-61 1993-94 2003-04

Va

lue

Ad

de

d (

Rs.

In

cro

res)

Year

Graph 1.2.5

Value Added (Rs. In crores)

2141436

20900

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

1960-61 1993-94 2003-04

Co

nsu

mp

tio

n o

f e

lectr

icit

y f

or

ind

ust

ria

l

use

(in

KW

h c

rore

s)

Year

Graph 1.2.6

Consumption of Electricity for Industrial use

12

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT OF MAHARASHTRA VIS-À-VIS

INDIA:

An attempt has been made to make comparison of industrial development of

Maharashtra with India with the help of some indicators in table1.5.

Table No. 1.5

Industrial Development of Maharashtra vis-à-vis India (2009-10)

(Rs. In Crore)

Sr. No. Indicator Maharashtra India

1 No. of Industries 19457(12.25) 158877

2 Fixed Capital 197274(14.59) 1352184

3 Working Capital 63467(16.37) 387745

4 Total output 624049(16.72) 3733036

5 Total Input 489066(16.12) 3035853

6 Gross Value Added 134983(19.36) 697183

7 Net value Added 117872(19.91) 592114

8 Employment (No) 10.63(11.6) 91.58

9 Profit 68549(20.59) 332931

Source: Central Statistical organization, Govt. of India.

Note: Figures in brackets indicate Maharashtra’s percentage to India (total).

0

500000

1000000

1500000

2000000

2500000

3000000

3500000

4000000

Am

ou

nt

in R

s.

Indicators

Graph 1.3.1

Industrial Development of Maharashtra vis-à-vis India

(2009-10) ( Rs. In crore)

Maharashtra

India

13

Table 1.5 & Graph 1.3.1, 1.3.2 & graph 1.3.3 discloses that Maharashtra’s share

in India’s total industrial development in terms of each indicator is major. It got 12.25%

19457

197274

63467

624049

489066

134983 117872

10.6368549

0

100000

200000

300000

400000

500000

600000

700000

Am

ou

nt

in R

s.

Indicators

Graph 1.3.2

Industrial Development of Maharashtra

(Select Indicators)

158877

1352184

387745

3733036

3035853

697183 592114

91.58332931

0

500000

1000000

1500000

2000000

2500000

3000000

3500000

4000000

Am

ou

nt

in R

s.

Indicators

Graph 1.3.3

Industrial Development of India (Select Indicators)

14

share in number of industries, 14.59% in fixed capital 16.37% in working capital,

16.72% in total output, 16.12% in total input, 19.36% in gross value added, 19.91% in

net value added, 11.6% in employment & 20.59% in profit. The analysis of data showed

the domination of Maharashtra in industrial development at national level.

Industrial Development Of Maharashtra Vis-À-Vis Other States:

Maharashtra has been enjoying a leading position as composed with other states

in India since middle of 20th century in terms of industrial development. For the purpose

of judging Maharashtra’s position comparing with other states in India in terms of

industrial development data regarding rank orders of states in organized and unorganized

manufacturing sector for the year 2006-07 have been given in table 1.6.

Table 1.6 indicates that Maharashtra state stood at the top in all states by holding

rank order first in registered & unregistered manufacturing sector in terms of GSDP & in

total too. Gujarat came at second rank order in registered & third in unregistered

manufacturing concerns resulting in second position in total.

It is revealed from the date analysis that the four most industrialized states are

Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Tamil Nadu & Uttar Pradesh. The least industrially developed

state is Sikkim followed by A & N Islands, Mizoram & others.

The analysis shows that ranking of state in terms of the shares of organized &

Unorganized in national aggregate were remarkably similar rating a rank correlation co

efficient of 0.906. It can be concluded from the analysis that Maharashtra enjoys the top

position in the country in terms of industrial development.

With the help of 4 select indicators of industrial development, another attempt

has been made to make analysis of data in order to show the relative position of

Maharashtra in relation to other leading selecting states in terms of industrial

development in the form of table 1.6.

15

Table No.1.6

Order of Ranks of states in India in number of MSME units

(2006-07)

State

Order of Ranks in GSDP Total Registered Unregistered

Maharashtra 1 1 1 Gujrat 2 2 2 Tamilnadu 3 3 3 Uttar Pradesh(+) 4 4 4 West Bengal 5 5 5 Karnataka 6 6 6 Andhrapradesh 7 7 7 Madhya Pradesh (+) 8 8 8 Rajasthan 9 9 9 Haryana 10 10 10 Bihar(+) 11 11 11 Punjab 12 12 12 Orissa 13 13 13 Kerala 14 14 14 Delhi 15 15 15 Assam 16 16 16 Pondicherry 17 17 17 Goa 18 18 18 Himachal Pradesh 19 19 19 Jammu & Kashmir 20 20 20 Chandigarh 21 21 21 Meghalaya 22 22 22 Manipur 23 23 23 Tripura 24 24 24 Arunachal Pradesh 25 25 25 Nagaland 26 26 26 Mizoram 27 27 27 A&N Island 28 28 28 Sikkim 29 29 29 Dadar and Nagar Haveli N.E. N.E. N.E. Daman and Diu N.E. N.E. N.E. Lakshadweep N.E. N.E. N.E. Correlation Between Share of Total and registered manufacturing GSDP

+1.00

Correlation between Share of registered and unregistered manufacturing GSDP

+1.00

Correlation between Share of total and unregistered manufacturing GSDP

+1.00

Source: www.mosp. gov.in

Note: ** Correlation is significant at 0.01 percent level.

16

Table 1.6 shows order of ranks of all states in India in terms of number of

registred and unregisterd MSME units in 2006-07. It is observed that Maharashtra was

at the first rank and Sikkim at the last number in case of lbothe number of registred and

unregistered MSME units. Maharashtra was followed by Gujarat by standing at second

rank, Tamilnadu at third and U.P. at fourth rank.

Correlation between unmber of tatal and registered, registered and unregisterd

and total and unregistered MSME units comes to +1.00 which indicates peroect relation

between the respective two items of each pair.

Table No. 1.7

Important select Indicators of Industrial development of Maharashtra vis-à-vis

select leading states (2007-08) (Value figures in Rs. Lakhs & others in numbers)

State

Factories Fixed Capital Workers Net Value

added

Maharashtra 18304 (12.5) 13729202 (16.25)

953097 (11.63) 11053762(22.95)

Gujrat 15107(10.32) 14540034(17.20) 797443(9.73) 6210755(12.90)

Tamilnadu 21042(14.37) 7933659(9.39) 1283478(15.66) 3934122(8.17)

Karnataka 8443(5.77) 5996709(7.10) 567836(6.93) 3465815(7.20)

Andhrapradesh 16741(11.44) 6425102(7.60) 862414(10.52) 3145778(6.53)

Uttar Pradesh 10717(7.32) 5845002(6.92) 589695(7.19) 2574292(5.35)

Jharkhand 1615(1.10) 2239894(2.65) 117548(1.43) 2062175(4.28)

Haryana 4707(3.22) 2886838(3.42) 400895(4.89) 1827000(3.79)

Chattisgarh 1854(1.27) 2294829(2.72) 118228(1.44) 1456960(3.03)

Madhyapradesh 3165(2.16) 2441823(2.89) 194046(2.37) 1422273(2.95)

West Bangal 5987(4.09) 3233151(3.83) 421280(5.14) 1417593(2.94)

Punjab 10178(6.95) 2178348(2.58) 435386(5.31) 1416746(2.94)

India 146385(100) 84513209(100) 8198110(100) 48159268(100)

Source : Annual survey of Industries 2007-08.

Note : Figures in the brackets indicate percentage to total.

17

0

2000000

4000000

6000000

8000000

10000000

12000000

14000000

16000000F

igu

res

in R

s.(L

ak

h)

& N

um

be

rs

State

Graph 1.4.1 Important select Indicatiors of Industrial Development of

Maharashtra vis-à-vis select leading states

Factories

Fixed

Capital

Workers

Net Value

added

18304

1517

21042

8443

16741

10717

1615

4707

18543165

5987

10178

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

Nu

mb

ers

State

Graph 1.4.2

Factories

18

13729202

14540034

7933659

5996709

6425102

5845002

2239894

2886838

2294829

2441823

3233151

2178348

0

2000000

4000000

6000000

8000000

10000000

12000000

14000000

16000000

Am

ou

nt

in L

ak

h

State

Graph 1.4.3

Fixed Capital

953097

797443

1283478

567836

862414

589695

117548

400895

118228194046

421280435386

0

200000

400000

600000

800000

1000000

1200000

1400000

Nu

mb

ers

State

Graph 1.4.4

Workers

19

It is revealed from the analysis of data shown in table 1.7 and graph 1.4.1, 1.4.2,

1.4.3, 1.4.4 & graph 1.4.5 that Maharashtra enjoyed the top position securing 22.92%

share in net value added followed by Gujarat, Tamilnadu, Karnataka by holding share

of 12.90%, 8.17% & 7.20% respectively Punjab secured the lowest share of 2. 94% in

this respect & enjoyed the lowest position among the select leading states.

In case of factories, Tamilnadu scored the highest share of 14.37% followed by

Maharashtra holding 12.5% share and the lowest position held by Jharkhand securing

1.10% share. In terms of fixed capital Gujarat gained the highest position securing

17.20% share followed by Maharashtra having 16.25 % share among the select states &

the lowest share of 2.58 % secured by Punjab.

With regard to workers, Tamilnadu got the highest share of 15.66% followed by

Maharashtra state of 11.63% share and the least share of 1.43% scored by

Jharkhand.Considering the net value added, it can be concluded that Maharashtra

enjoyed the top position in India in terms of industrial development.

District-wise & Division-wise Industrial DevelopmentiIn Maharashtra:

At the time of formation of Maharashtra State in 1960, there was a great

industrial disparity among western Maharashtra, Vidarbh, and Marathawada regions

altimately among the districts of the state. In fact, regional imbalance in Maharashtra is

11053762

6210755

3934122

346581

31457782574292

20621751827000

1456960

14222731417593

1416746

0

2000000

4000000

6000000

8000000

10000000

12000000

Am

ou

nt

in L

ak

h

State

Graph 1.4.5

Net Value Added

20

at the highest level in our country.(11) The Govt. of Maharashtra has been making

deliberate & planned efforts to achieve balanced industrial development across the state.

The State Government has adopted industrial dispersal policy since the formation of the

state in order to achieve balanced industrial development all over the state by dispersing

industries concentrated in the belt of Mumbai, Thane & Pune to the areas where

industrial development.

An attempt has been made to make review of district-wise & division-wise

industrial development at the two points of time, i.e. 1999-2000 & 2008-09 with the help

of 7 select indicators such as fixed capital, working capital, total number of employment

in factories, total number of workers, number of working factories, industrial estate &

consumption of electricity in factories in the state.

District-wise & Division-Wise Fixed Capital Invested In Factories In Maharashtra:

Fixed capital invested in factories in Maharashtra is one of the factors selected for

making relative study of industrial development. Table 1.8 Graph 1.5 shows share of all

districts & divisions in respect of fixed capital invested in factories in Maharashtra. In

1999-2000, greater Mumbai scored the highest 29.67% share in fixed capital followed by

Pune scoring 12.45% share, Ratnagiri 11.47%, Raigad 8.96% & thane 7.54%. The least

share of zero percent was held by Nandurbar, Washim & Gondia districts. In case of

divisions, it is observed that Konkan division topped the state by securing 58% share

followed by Pune division holding 20.49% share & Nagpur of 9.23 %. The division

securing the lowest share in this regard was Amravati which scored 1.43% share.

In 2008-09, Pune district topped the state by having 20.08% share in fixed capital

invested in factories followed by Raigad securing 18.23% greater Mumbai of 13.40 %

with the lowest share held by Washim of 0.01% followed by Gondia of 0.02 %. In case

of divisions, it is seen that Konkan division was again at the top by having 49.77% share

followed by Pune at 25.11% & Nasik at 8.72%, Amravati division came the last position

by scoring 0.96% share followed by Aurangabad securing 7.47% share in fixed capital

invested in factories in the state. Table 1.8 shows 1999-2000 there were higher districts

and divisional industrial disparity in the state, then in 2008-09, as it is clear from C.V.

which slide down from 181.83% in 1999-2000 to 178.66% in 2008-09.

From the analysis, it can be judged that industrialization was concentrated in a particular

area of Konkan & Pune regions.

21

Table No. 1.8 District and Division-wise Fixed Capital Invested in Factories in Maharashtra

(Rs. In ‘000) District & Division Fixed capital (Rs. In ‘000)

1999-2000 Percentage to total

2008-09 Percentage to taoal

Greater Mumbai 208920449 29.67% 239832203 13.40% Thane 53118793 7.54% 209741231 11.72% Raigad 63087470 8.96% 326396979 18.23% Ratnagiri 80785629 11.47% 113568053 6.34% Sindhudurg 2489452 0.35% 1467254 0.08% Konkan Region 408401793 58.00% 891005720 49.77% Pune 87695498 12.45% 359524343 20.08% Satara 9488782 1.35% 13120916 0.73% Sangali 6784844 0.96% 10989379 0.61% Solapur 5787692 0.82% 18940561 1.06% Kolhapur 34531434 4.90% 46949853 2.62% Pune Region 144288250 20.49% 449525052 25.11% Nasik 25859956 3.67% 102043447 5.70% Nandurbar N.A. N.A. 2160112 0.12% Dhule 2578695 0.37% 6056786 0.34% Jalgaon 7657228 1.09% 25582965 1.43% Ahmadnagar 5965247 0.85% 20200498 1.13% Aurangabad 29446406 4.18% 115184732 6.43% Jalna 1013490 0.14% 3735439 0.21% Parbhani 483262 0.07% 594232 0.03% Hingoli N.A N.A. 833880 0.05% Beed 856292 0.12% 5442893 0.30% Nanded 1914855 0.27% 2735465 0.15% Osmanabad 383051 0.05% 3684325 0.21% Latur 233716 0.03% 1567129 0.09% Aurangabad Region 3433107 4.88% 133778095 7.47% Buldhana 3109174 0.44% 4639983 0.26% Akola 1280186 0.18% 2171535 0.12% Washim N.A N.A. 157550 0.01% Amravati 420109 0.06% 2921963 0.16% Wardha 12974761 1.84% 133771778 0.77% Nagpur 36760954 5.22% 80869557 4.52% Bhandara 5498905 0.78% 6246084 0.35% Gondia N.A N.A. 415698 0.02% Chandrapur 8756037 1.24% 38764386 2.17% Gadchiroli 975870 0.14% 2530410 0.14% Nagpur Region 64966527 9.23% 142598213 7.97% Grand Total 704123225 100.00% 1790178711 100.00% Mean 23470774 94069816 S.D. 42676573 94069816 C.V. 181.83 178.66 Source: Unit level data purchased from ministry of statistic program implementation Government of India. Note : 1. Figures in the brackets indicate percentage to total. 2. N.A. indicates Not Available.

22

0

10000000

20000000

30000000

40000000

50000000

60000000

70000000

80000000

90000000

1E+09

Gre

ate

r M

um

bai

Th

an

e

Raig

ad

Ratn

agir

i

Sin

dh

ud

urg

Ko

nkan

Re

gio

n

Pu

ne

Sata

ra

San

gali

So

lap

ur

Ko

lhap

ur

Pu

ne

Re

gio

n

Nasi

k

Nan

du

rbar

Dh

ule

Jalg

ao

n

Ah

mad

nagar

Au

ran

gab

ad

Jaln

a

Parb

han

i

Hin

go

li

Be

ed

Nan

de

d

Osm

an

ab

ad

Latu

r

Au

ran

gab

ad

…

Bu

ldh

an

a

Ako

la

Wash

im

Am

ravati

Ward

ha

Nagp

ur

Bh

an

dara

Go

nd

ia

Ch

an

dra

pu

r

Gad

ch

iro

li

Nagp

ur

Re

gio

n

Fix

ed

Ca

pit

al

in R

s.

District & Division

Graph 1.5

District and Division-wise Fixed Capital Invested in Factories in Maharashtra

23

Table No. 1.9 District & Division-wise Working Capital Invested in Factories in Maharashtra

District & Division

Working capital (Rs. In ‘000) 1999-2000 Percentage

to total 2008-09 Percentage to

total Greater Mumbai 26211476 13.57% 120804841 24.52% Thane 18097838 9.37% 58614177 11.89% Raigad 37349993 19.34% 50853838 10.32% Ratnagiri 1453039 0.75% 5841486 1.19% Sindhudurg 1563337 0.81% -431791 -0.09% Konkan Region 84675683 43.84% 235682551 47.83% Pune 27284790 14.13% 8107358 16.45% Satara 1081257 0.56% 5973034 1.21% Sangali 17112 0.09% 881897 0.18% Solapur -258687 -0.13% 8386384 1.70% Kolhapur 1666988 0.86% 8703630 1.77% Pune Region 29945520 15.50% 105018256 21.31% Nasik 10028751 5.19% 43470519 8.82% Nandurbar -463757 -0.24% 316639 0.28% Dhule -468791 -0.24% 1395689 0.28% Jalgaon 3110940 1.61% 14709269 2.99% Ahmadnagar -3328915 1.72% 97008820 1.97% Aurangabad 9341985 4.84% 69592936 14.12% Jalna 471585 0.24% 3501122 0.71% Parbhani 202135 0.10% -8727 0.00% Hingoli N.A. N.A. 128125 0.03% Beed 632302 0.33% 835225 0.17% Nanded 663149 0.34% -258076 0.05% Osmanabad 171639 0.09% 354002 0.07% Latur 349801 0.18% 662853 0.13% Aurangabad Region 15472297 8.01% 42788746 8.38% Buldhana 318548 0.16% 1578265 0.32% Akola 1083585 0.56% 3365150 0.68% Washim N.A. N.A. 82250 0.02% Amravati 302885 0.16% 2302490 0.47% Yawatmal 428809 0.22% 2278761 0.46% Amravati Region 2133827 1.10% 9606916 1.95% Wardha 1228430 0.64% -1269273 -0.26% Nagpur 4272451 22.12% 21496326 4.36% Bhandara 5498905 2.85% 4165182 0.85% Gondia N.A. N.A. 141571 0.03% Chandrapur 1899298 0.98% 4625404 0.94% Gadchiroli 217544 0.11% 915309 0.19% Nagpur Region 51568688 26.70% 30074419 6.10% Grand Total 193138000 100.00% 492764094 100.00% Mean 6437933 14493062 S.D. 11850965 27202332 C.V. 184.08 187.69 Source: Unit level data purchased from ministry of statistic & programme implementation regarding ASR Data of Maharashtra for year 1999-2000 & 2008-2009. Note :1. Figures in the brackets indicate percentage to total. 2. N.A. indicates Not Available.

24

-5000000

0

50000000

10000000

15000000

20000000

25000000

Gre

ate

r M

um

ba

i

Th

an

e

Ra

iga

d

Ra

tna

gir

i

Sin

dh

ud

urg

Ko

nka

n R

eg

ion

Pu

ne

Sa

tara

Sa

ng

ali

So

lap

ur

Ko

lha

pu

r

Pu

ne

Re

gio

n

Na

sik

Na

nd

urb

ar

Dh

ule

Jalg

ao

n

Ah

ma

dn

ag

ar

Au

ran

ga

ba

d

Jaln

a

Pa

rbh

an

i

Hin

go

li

Be

ed

Na

nd

ed

Osm

an

ab

ad

La

tur

Au

ran

ga

ba

d R

eg

ion

Bu

ldh

an

a

Ako

la

Wa

shim

Am

rava

ti

Ya

wa

tma

l

Am

rava

ti R

eg

ion

Wa

rdh

a

Na

gp

ur

Bh

an

da

ra

Go

nd

ia

Ch

an

dra

pu

r

Ga

dch

iro

li

Na

gp

ur

Re

gio

n

Fix

ed

Ca

pit

al in

Rs.

Division and District

Graph 1.6

District & Division-wise Working Capital Invested in Factories in Maharashtra

Fixed capital (Rs. In ‘000) 1999-2000 Fixed capital (Rs. In ‘000) 2008-09

25

Working capital invested in factories in Maharashtra state is one of the factory

selected for research of industrial development among districts and divisions of the state.

Table 1.9 & Graph 1.6 shows share of all districts divisions in respect of working

capital invested in factories in Maharashtra.

In 1999-2000, Nagpur was on first position 22.12%, Raigad 19.34%, share, Pune

14.13% greater Mumbai 13.57%. The least share of zero percent was held by Solapur,

Dhule, Ahmadnagar, Hingoli, Washim districts.

In the case of division it is seen that, Kokan division secured the highest 43.84%

share followed by Nagpur division 26.70% share, Pune 15.50% share.

Amravati division has lowest share i.e. 0.64%, followed by Nashik division with

4.84%share. In 2008-09, greater Mumbai district has on first position 24.52% share,

followed by Pune district 16.45%, Thane 11.89%, Raigad 10.32% share lowest share

held by Sindhudurg, 0.09%, Nanded 0.05%, Wardha 0.26%.

In the case of divisions it is observed from table no 1.9 that Konkan division

ranked on first position with, 47.83% share followed by Pune division 21.31% share,

Nashik 14.12% share lowest share held by Amravati division 1.95%.

In 1999-2000, there was higher district and division industrial disparity in the

Maharashtra at the time c.v. has 181.83 than in 2008-09, was 178.66. It is clear from the

C.V. that industrial disparity has going down, gradually in Maharashtra.

Table No. 1.10

Total Number of Factory workers in Maharashtra

(in numbers) No. of Workers

District & Division

No. of Workers

1999-2000 Percentage to total 2008-09 Percentage to

total Greater Mumbai 150230 17.58% 152337 14.73%

Thane 138602 16.22% 187635 16.22% Raigad 30180 3.53% 41661 4.03%

Ratnagiri 13340 1.56% 14296 1.38% Sindhudurg 2488 0.29% 2716 0.26%

Konkan Region 334840 39.19% 398645 38.55% Pune 127430 14.92% 205954 19.91% Satara 14220 1.66% 15487 1.50% Sangali 14530 1.70% 15133 1.46% Solapur 52537 6.15% 35156 3.40%

Kolhapur 32690 3.83% 47790 4.69% Pune Region 241407 28.26% 319520 30.90%

Nasik 54351 6.36% 7035 6.80%

26

District & Division

No. of Workers


total Dhule 10612 1.24% 6798 0.66%

Nandurbar N.A. N.A. 2219 0.21% Jalgaon 19560 2.29% 22924 2.22%

Ahmadnagar 26664 3.12% 20367 1.97% Nasik Region 111187 13.01% 122658 11.86% Aurangabad 33583 3.93% 52734 5.10%

Jalna 6313 0.74% 10015 0.97% Parbhani 6387 0.75% 3497 0.34% Hingoli N.A. N.A. 1337 0.13% Beed 3133 0.37% 3833 0.37%

Nanded 11159 1.31% 2910 0.28% Osmanabad 3258 0.38% 2827 0.27%

Latur 3113 0.38% 3300 0.32% Aurangabad Region 11159 7.84% 80483 7.78%

Buldhana 5530 0.65% 5707 0.55% Akola 11403 1.33% 5488 0.53%

Washim N.A. N.A. 938 0.09% Amravati 6512 0.76% 3605 0.35% Yawatmal 8515 1.00% 9035 0.86%

Amravati Region 31960 3.74% 24773 2.40% Wardha 10096 1.18% 7428 0.72% Nagpur 38777 4.54% 50062 5.61%

Bhandara 8847 1.04% 3351 0.32% Gondia N.A. N.A. 5551 0.54%

Chandrapur 9546 1.12% 12637 1.22% Gadchiroli 743 0.09% 1104 0.11

Nagpur Region 68009 7.96% 88133 8.52% Grand Total 854349 100.00% 1034212 100.00%

Mean 28478 30418 S.D. 40086 51632 C.V. 140.76 169.74

Source: Unit level data purchased from ministry of statistic & programme implementation

regarding ASI Data of Maharashtra for the year 1999-2000 & 2008-2009.

Note : 1. Figures in the brackets indicate percentage to total.

2. N.A. indicates Not Available.

27

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000

400000

450000

Gre

ate

r M

um

ba

i

Th

an

e

Ra

iga

d

Ra

tna

gir

i

Sin

dh

ud

urg

Ko

nka

n R

eg

ion

Pu

ne

Sa

tara

Sa

ng

ali

So

lap

ur

Ko

lha

pu

r

Pu

ne

Re

gio

n

Na

sik

Dh

ule

Na

nd

urb

ar

Jalg

ao

n

Ah

ma

dn

ag

ar

Na

sik R

eg

ion

Au

ran

ga

ba

d

Jaln

a

Pa

rbh

an

i

Hin

go

li

Be

ed

Na

nd

ed

Osm

an

ab

ad

La

tur

Au

ran

ga

ba

d R

eg

ion

Bu

ldh

an

a

Ako

la

Wa

shim

Am

rava

ti

Ya

wa

tma

l

Am

rava

ti R

eg

ion

Wa

rdh

a

Na

gp

ur

Bh

an

da

ra

Go

nd

ia

Ch

an

dra

pu

r

Ga

dch

iro

li

Na

gp

ur

Re

gio

n

No

. o

f W

ork

ers

District & Division

Graph 1.7

Total Number of Factory workers in Maharashtra

(in numbers)

No. of Workers 1999-2000 No. of Workers 2008-09

28

Table 1.10 & Graph 1.7 shows total number of workers in factories in

Maharashtra, with District-wise division during study period i.e. 1999-2000 to 2008-09.

In 1999-2000, greater Mumbai has secured the highest 17.58% share in total

number of employment in factories in the state followed Thane district 16.22% share,

Nagpur 4.54% share etc. The lowest share percentage held by Sindhudurg 0.29%,

Gadchiroli 0.09%, Buldhana 6.5%.As far as division on concerned, it is observed that

Konkan division toped in the state by securing 39.19% share, followed by Pune division

28.26%. The division securing lowest share in this context was Amrawati Division on

3.74% share.

In 2008-09, Raigad district rank first in the state by having 18.14% share,

followed by greater Mumbai 14.73% share, Thane 11.72% share. Lowest share held by

Gadchiroli district i.e. 0.11% share followed by Parbhani district 0.13% share.

In the case of division, it is seen that Konkan division was again top by having

38.55% share, followed by Pune division 30.90%, share and Nashik 11.86% share,

Amrawati division come at least position by getting 2.40% share, followed by

Aurangabad division 7.78% share in total number of employment in factories in

Maharashtra.

It can be summarized that on the basis of C.V. which increased from 140.76% in

1999-2000 to 169.74% in 2008-09. From the observation it can be judged that

industrialization has concern metric in particular area of Konkan & Region regions.

Table No. 1.11

Total of No. of Employment in Factories in Maharashtra

(in numbers) Total No. of Employment

District/Division

No. of Employment

1999-2000 Percentage to total 2008-09 Percentage

to total Greater Mumbai 202444 16.63% 245687 16.47%

Thane 243420 20.00% 269810 18.08% Raigad 45839 3.75% 66268 4.44%


Konkan Region 509376 41.85% 603262 40.43% Pune 188646 15.50% 299750 20.09% Satara 16899 1.39% 20830 1.40% Sangali 17260 1.42% 21076 1.41%

29

District/Division

No. of Employment

1999-2000 Percentage to total 2008-09 Percentage

to total Solapur 60085 4.94% 43115 2.89%


Nasik 72911 5.99% 100278 6.72% Dhule 14444 1.19% 8048 0.54%

Nandurbar N.A. N.A. 3531 0.24% Ahmadnagar 38025 3.12% 30585 2.05% Nasik Region 152381 12.52% 174186 11.68% Aurangabad 47754 3.92% 73886 4.95%




Buldhana 5850 0.48% 7104 0.48% Akola 14414 1.18% 8057 0.54%




Chandrapur 12748 1.05% 15708 1.05% Gadchiroli 921 0.08% 1357 0.09%


Mean 40575 43881 S.D. 61514 76710 C.V. 151.61 174.81

Source: Unit level data purchased from ministry of statistic & programme implementation regarding ASI Data of Maharashtra for the year 1999-2000 & 2008-2009. Note : 1. Figures in the brackets indicate percentage to total. 2. N.A. indicates Not Available.

30

0

100000

200000

300000

400000

500000

600000

700000

Gre

ate

r M

um

ba

i

Th

an

e

Ra

iga

d

Ra

tna

gir

i

Sin

dh

ud

urg

Ko

nka

n R

eg

ion

Pu

ne

Sa

tara

Sa

ng

ali

So

lap

ur

Ko

lha

pu

r

Pu

ne

Re

gio

n

Na

sik

Dh

ule

Na

nd

urb

ar

Jalg

ao

n

Ah

ma

dn

ag

ar

Na

sik R

eg

ion

Au

ran

ga

ba

d

Jaln

a

Pa

rbh

an

i

Hin

go

li

Be

ed

Na

nd

ed

Osm

an

ab

ad

La

tur

Au

ran

ga

ba

d R

eg

ion

Bu

ldh

an

a

Ako

la

Wa

shim

Am

rava

ti

Ya

wa

tma

l

Am

rava

ti R

eg

ion

Wa

rdh

a

Na

gp

ur

Bh

an

da

ra

Go

nd

ia

Ch

an

dra

pu

r

Ga

dch

iro

li

Na

gp

ur

Re

gio

n

No

. o

f W

orke

rs

District & Division

Graph 1.8

Total of No. of Employment in Factories in Maharashtra (in numbers)

No. of Employment 1999-2000 No. of Employment 2008-09

31

Table 1.11 & Graph 1.8 of employment in factories in the state is one of the

factors selected for making relative study of industrial development within district

division in Maharashtra. Table 1.11 shows the all the districts and divisions in respect of

total number of employment in factories in Maharashtra.

In 1999-2000, Thane district topped in the state with 20% share in total number

of employment in factories, followed by greater Mumbai 16.63%, Pune 16.63% least

share held by Gadchiroli district 0.08%, followed by Osmanabad district 0.34% share.

In the case of divisions it is observed that Konkan division was topped with

41.85% share in total number of employment, followed by Pune division 27.55% share,

Nashik 12.52% share least share was held by Amrawati division non with 3.06% share,

followed by Nagpur division 7.47% share.In 2008-09, Pune district topped in

Maharashtra by having 20.09% share in total number of employment in factories,

followed by Thane district 18.08% share, greater Mumbai 16.47% share.

As far as divisions on concerned, Konkan division was again at top by having

40.43% share in total number of employment in Maharashtra, followed by Pune division

7.83% share, least share was held in Amrawati division i.e. 2.26% share.

Industrial policy of Maharashtra having positive effect in industrial dispersal was

gradually declines. The share of most industry developed districts was declined Pune

20%, in 1999-2000 to 18.08 in 2008-09% in 2008-09. Greater Mumbai 16.63% in 1999-

2000 to 16.47% in 2008-09.

Table No. 1.12 Working Factories in Maharashtra

District/ Division No. of Working Factories ('000')



Thane N.A. N.A. 3503 17.12% Raigad 1060 5.58% 556 2.72%



Kolhapur 392 2.06% 821 4.01%

32

District/ Division No. of Working Factories ('000')


total Pune Region 5652 29.73% 4220 20.63%

Dhule 462 2.43% 117 0.57% Nandurbar N.A. N.A. 51 0.25%

Jalgaon 842 4.43% 707 3.46% Ahmadnagar 797 4.19% 303 1.48% Nasik Region 3479 18.30% 2841 13.89% Aurangabad 767 4.03% 852 4.16%




Buldhana 104 0.55% 234 1.14% Akola 439 2.31% 329 1.61%


Amravati Region 1019 5.36% 1061 5.19% Wardha 196 1.03% 119 0.58% Nagpur 1839 9.67 1287 6.29%


Chandrapur 400 2.10% 147 0.72% Gadchiroli 115 0.60% 22 0.11%


Mean 655 602 S.D. 756 1079 C.V. 115.37 179.39

Source: Unit level data purchased from ministry of statistic & programme implementation


Note : 1. Figures in the brackets indicate percentage to total.

2. N.A. indicates Not Available.

33

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

Gre

ate

r M

um

ba

i

Th

an

e

Ra

iga

d

Ra

tna

gir

i

Sin

dh

ud

urg

Ko

nka

n R

eg

ion

Pu

ne

Sa

tara

Sa

ng

ali

So

lap

ur

Ko

lha

pu

r

Pu

ne

Re

gio

n

Na

sik

Dh

ule

Na

nd

urb

ar

Jalg

ao

n

Ah

ma

dn

ag

ar

Na

sik R

eg

ion

Au

ran

ga

ba

d

Jaln

a

Pa

rbh

an

i

Hin

go

li

Be

ed

Na

nd

ed

Osm

an

ab

ad

La

tur

Au

ran

ga

ba

d R

eg

ion

Bu

ldh

an

a

Ako

la

Wa

shim

Am

rava

ti

Ya

wa

tma

l

Am

rava

ti R

eg

ion

Wa

rdh

a

Na

gp

ur

Bh

an

da

ra

Go

nd

ia

Ch

an

dra

pu

r

Ga

dch

iro

li

Na

gp

ur

Re

gio

n

No

. o

f W

ork

ers in

'0

00

'

District and Division

Graph 1.9

Working Factories in Maharashtra (in '000')

No. of Working Factories 1999-2000 No. of Working Factories 2008-09

34

Table 1.12 & Graph 1.9 shows that the number of working factories in

Maharashtra is one of factors selected for making relative study of industrial

development in districts divisions in Maharashtra table 1.12 shows the share of all the

district division in respect of number of working factories in Maharashtra.

In 1999-2000, Pune 18.22% followed by greater Mumbai scored the highest

12.64% share in number of working factories followed by Nagpur 9.67% share. The least

share was held by Osmanabad district 0.28% share, followed by Buldhana district,

Yavatmal 0.43% share. In the case of divisions, it is seen that Pune division ranked

highest share 29.73% share followed by Konkan division holding 18.87% share. The

lowest share held by Amrawati division in this regard with 5.36% share followed by

Aurangabad 10.54% share. In 2008-09, Mumbai district was at the top by having 24.13%

share in number of working factories, second position share was held by Thane district

17.12% share followed by Pune district 12.68%. The least position secured by Gadchiroli

district with 0.11% share in number of working factories Osmanabad 0.14% share.

In the case of division Konkan division was again at the top by having 45.12%

share followed by Pune division 20.63% share, lowest share was held by held by

Amrawati division i.e. 5.19% share followed by Aurangabad division with 6.85% share.

It is also seen from the table the industrial disparity has increasing Inter State

C.V. in 1999-00, 115.37 was increased to 179.39 in 2008-09.

Table No. 1.13 Number of Industrial Estate in Factory sector in Maharashtra ( In '000')

District/Division

No. of Industrial Estates



Thane 10 4.17% 10 3.77% Raigad 12 5.00% 12 4.53%




Nasik 10 4.17% 10 3.77% Dhule 7 2.92% 8 3.02%

Jalgaon 6 2.50% 6 2.26%

35

District/Division

No. of Industrial Estates


total Ahmadnagar 6 2.50% 6 2.26% Nasik Region 29 12.08% 30 11.32%

Jalna 5 2.08% 5 1.89% Parbhani 7 2.92% 8 3.02%

Beed 6 2.50% 7 2.64% Nanded 7 2.92% 8 3.02%

Osmanabad 4 1.67% 4 1.51% Latur 5 2.08% 11 4.15%

Aurangabad Region 41 17.08% 51 19.25% Buldhana 8 3.33% 8 3.02%

Akola 9 3.75% 10 3.77% Amravati 14 5.83% 15 5.66% Yawatmal 10 4.17% 11 4.15%


Bhandara 12 5.00% 12 4.53% Chandrapur 10 4.17% 10 3.77 Gadchiroli 6 2.50% 6 2.66%


Mean 13 15 S.D. 12 14 C.V. 91.87 93.47

Source: Unit level data purchased from ministry of statistic & programme implementation regarding ASI Data of Maharashtra for the year 1999-2000 & 2008-2009. Note : Figures in the brackets indicate percentage to total.

Table 1.13 & Graph 1.10 shows the number of industrial estate in Maharashtra is

one of important indicator to study the industrial development in Maharashtra. Table

1.13 shows the share of all district & division in respect of number of industrial estate in

Maharashtra.

In 1999-2000, Pune district having 15.83% share, scored at the top Amravati

district scored the second having 5.83% share in number of industrial estate followed by

Thane, Nagput and Bhandara district 5% share, Ratnagiri 4.58% share. The lowest

0.83% share was held by Greater Mumbai district, followed by Osmanabad district

1.67% share.

In the case of divisions, it is seen that Nagpur division topped in the state by

securing 19.58% share followed by Pune division 18.33% share. The division securing

lowest share in this regard was Nasik division which scored 12.08% share followed by

Aurangabad and Amravati division 17.08% share.

36

0

10

20

30

40

50

60G

rea

ter

Mu

mb

ai

Th

an

e

Ra

iga

d

Ra

tna

gir

i

Sin

dh

ud

urg

Ko

nka

n R

eg

ion

Pu

ne

Sa

tara

Sa

ng

ali

So

lap

ur

Ko

lha

pu

r

Pu

ne

Re

gio

n

Na

sik

Dh

ule

Jalg

ao

n

Ah

ma

dn

ag

ar

Na

sik R

eg

ion

Au

ran

ga

ba

d

Jaln

a

Pa

rbh

an

i

Be

ed

Na

nd

ed

Osm

an

ab

ad

La

tur

Au

ran

ga

ba

d R

eg

ion

Bu

ldh

an

a

Ako

la

Am

rava

ti

Ya

wa

tma

l

Am

rava

ti R

eg

ion

Wa

rdh

a

Na

gp

ur

Bh

an

da

ra

Ch

an

dra

pu

r

Ga

dch

iro

li

Na

gp

ur

Re

gio

n

No

. o

f In

du

stri

al E

sta

te (

in '0

00

')

District & Division

Graph 1.10

No. of Industrial Estate in Factories Sector in Maharashtra (in '000')

No. of Industrialist 1999-2000 No. of Industrialist 2008-2009

37

Table No. 1.14 Share of All District in Respect of Industrial consumption of Electricity in Factories

in Maharashtra (In KWH) Capita industrial Consumpt ion of Electricity District/ Division

Capita industrial Consumption of Electricity 1999-2000 % to total 2008-09 % to total

Greater Mumbai 262.3 5.90% N.A. N.A. Thane 409.0 9.21% 465.2 7.81% Raigad 743.6 16.74% 1183.6 19.87% Ratnagiri 177.6 4.00% 221.8 3.72% Sindhudurg 20.7 0.47% 23.8 0.40% Konkan Region 1613.5 36.32% 1894.4 31.81% Pune 302.2 6.80% 513.1 8.61% Satara 66.5 1.50% 94.8 1.59% Sangali 84.3 1.19% 107.9 1.81% Solapur 81.4 1.83% 97.3 1.63% Kolhapur 203.3 14.58% 263.6 4.43% Pune Region 737.7 16.61% 1076.7 18.8% Nasik 190.7 4.29% 219.2 3.68% Nandurbar N.A. N.A. 32.6 0.55% Dhule 51.4 1.16% 102.6 1.17% Jalgaon 67.6 1.52% 104.1 1.75% Ahmadnagar 77.7 1.75% 83 1.39% Nasik Region 387.4 8.72% 541.5 9.09% Aurangabad 206.6 4.65% 285 4.79% Jalna 145.7 3.28% 400.6 6.73% Parbhani 15.6 0.35% 260.35 0.44% Hingoli N.A. N.A. 18 0.30% Beed 17.7 0.40% 24 0.40% Nanded 28.5 8.64% 21.6 0.36% Osmanabad 23.9 0.54% 36.4 0.61% Latur 28.6 0.64% 32.1 0.54% Aurangabad Region 466.6 10.50% 843.7 14.17% Buldhana 37.9 0.85% 47.8 0.80% Akola 35.9 0.81% 57.5 0.97% Washim N.A. N.A. 16.8 0.28% Amravati 24.9 0.56% 31 0.52% Yawatmal 42 0.95% 50.1 0.84% Amravati Region 140.7 3.17% 203.2 3.41% Wardha 313.6 7.06% 485.2 8.15% Nagpur 238.3 5.36% 331.2 5.56% Bhandara 166.7 3.75% 331.9 2.21% Gondia N.A. N.A. 37.9 0.64% Chandrapur 316.7 7.13% 342 5.74% Gadchiroli 61.4 1.38% 68.3 1.15% Nagpur Region 1096.7 24.69% 1396.5 23.45% Grand Total 442.6 100.00% 5956 100.00% Mean 148 175 S.D. 158 234 C.V. 106.59 133.51

Source: Unit level data purchased from ministry of statistic & programme implementation regarding ASI and District level social economic survey published by directorate of economics and statistics Government of Maharashtra various issues, Data of Maharashtra for the year 1999-2000 & 2008-2009. Note : Figures in the brackets indicate percentage to total.

38

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

Gre

ate

r M

um

ba

i

Th

an

e

Ra

iga

d

Ra

tna

gir

i

Sin

dh

ud

urg

Ko

nka

n R

eg

ion

Pu

ne

Sa

tara

Sa

ng

ali

So

lap

ur

Ko

lha

pu

r

Pu

ne

Re

gio

n

Na

sik

Na

nd

urb

ar

Dh

ule

Jalg

ao

n

Ah

ma

dn

ag

ar

Na

sik R

eg

ion

Au

ran

ga

ba

d

Jaln

a

Pa

rbh

an

i

Hin

go

li

Be

ed

Na

nd

ed

Osm

an

ab

ad

La

tur

Au

ran

ga

ba

d R

eg

ion

Bu

ldh

an

a

Ako

la

Wa

shim

Am

rava

ti

Ya

wa

tma

l

Am

rava

ti R

eg

ion

Wa

rdh

a

Na

gp

ur

Bh

an

da

ra

Go

nd

ia

Ch

an

dra

pu

r

Ga

dch

iro

li

Na

gp

ur

Re

gio

n

Ca

pit

a i

nd

ust

ria

l C

on

sum

pti

on

of

Ele

ctr

icit

y in

KW

H

District & Division

Graph 1.11

Share of All District in Respect of Industrial Consumption of Electricity in Factories in

Maharashtra

Capita industrial Consumption of Electricity 1999-2000 Capita industrial Consumption of Electricity 2008-09

39

In 2008-09, Pune district scored highest 16.60% share in number of industrial

estate in Maharashtra followed by Amravati district 5.66% share, Sangali 4.91% share.

The lowest share was held by Greater Mumbai district 1.13% share, followed by

Sindhudurga 1.25% share.

In the case of divisions, it is observed that Aurangabad division was at top by

having 19.25% share, followed by Pune 18.49%, Nagpur division 17.74%. The lowest

share was held in Nashik division by region 11.32% share

Table 1.14 & Graph 1.11 shows consumption of Electricity in factories in

Maharashtra is one of important indicating to study the industrial development in

Maharashtra. Table 1.14 shows the share of all district & division in respect of per capita

industrial consumption of Electricity in factories in Maharashtra.

In 1999-2000, Raigad district scored the top having 16.74% share in per capita

E.C. followed Thane district 9.21% share, Pune 6.80% share. The lowest 0.35% share

was held by Parbhani district, followed by Beed district 0.40% share.

In the case of divisions, it is seen that Konkan division topped in the state by securing

36.32% share followed by Pune division 16.61% share. The division securing lowest

share in this regard was Amrawati division which scored 3.17% share followed by

Nashik division 8.72%.

In 2008-09, Raigad district scored highest 19.8% share in per capita E.C.

followed by Pune district 8.61% share, Wardha 8.15% share. The lowest share was held

by Washim district 0.28% share, followed Hingoli 0.30% share.

In the case of divisions, it is observed that Konkan division was again at top by

having 31.8% share, followed by Nandurbar 23.45%, Pune division 18.08%. The lowest

share was held in Amrawati division by region 3.41% share.

On the basis of above discussion a few observation are summarized as under:-

1. Maharashtra state is prominent in industrial development of country.

2. CIP index value of various leading countries for 2000 and 2005 showed that

industrial development of India went up to 54 ranks in 2005, from 51 rank in

2000.

3. It noticed that indicator showed that impressive industrial development in

Maharashtra since inception the number of worked went by near about 2 times,

number of factories by 23 times , fixed capital by 876 times , value added by 374

times and consumption of electricity for industrial use by 9 times over the period.

40

4. It is noticed that Maharashtra’s share in industrial development in India showed

that 12.25 share in number of industries , 14.59% in fixed capital 16.37% in

working capital, 16.72% in total output and 19.91% in net value added and last

20.59% in profit.

5. It observed that grater Mumbai thane and konkan region toped in the state

securing 39.91% of workers in factories followed by Pune division with share

28.26%

6. It also observed that fixed capital invested in a factories in Maharashtra showed

that higher districts and industrial disparity is the state the C.V. which slided

down from 181.83 % in 1999-00 to 178.66% in 2008-09.

7. It is revealed that working capital invested in factories in Maharashtra as we

know Konkan division ranked on first position with the share 47.83% , followed

by Pune division 21.31% share and lowest share held by Amravati division

1.95%

8. It noticed that in 2008-09, Pune district toped in Maharashtra by having 20.09%

share in total number of employment in factories, followed by Thane district

18.08% share, grater Mumbai 16.47%.

9. It is observed that in 2008-09 grater Mumbai district was at top by having

24.13% shares in number of factories, second position share was held by Thane

district 17.12% share followed by Pune district 12.68% share. The least position

secured by Gadchiroli district with 0.11% share in number of working factories.

It is also seen that the industrial disparity has increasing interstate the C.V. in

1999-2000 was 115.37% which was increased to 179.39% in 2008-09.

10. It revealed from above that, in 2008-09 the consumption of electricity in factories

in Maharashtra, Raigad district scored highest 19.80% share in consumption of

electricity for industries followed by Pune district 8.61% share, Wardha district

8.15% share. The lowest share was held by Washim district 0.28% share.

The kokan division was again at top having 31.80 % share followed by Nagpur

division 23.45% share and the lowest share was held in Amravati division by

3.41% share.

41

References

1. The State Reorganization Act, 1956

2. The Mumbai State Reorganization Act, 1960

3. United Nations Industrial Development Report, 2008-09

4. Economic Survey of Maharashtra 2004-05 P. 178

5. V.S. Kaveri Industrial & Banking Development in Maharashtra, an article in the

book – ‘Regional Economic Development in India, edited by Susheela subrahmanya

and M.V. Shrinivasa Gowda (1995), P.464

6. Annual Survey Of Industries 2003-04, http://mospi.nic.in /asi-table3-2003-04, P. 1

& 2.

7. Dainik Lokmat (Marathi) Aurangabad 27th Sept.,2006,P.2

8. MCED 3 Day International Business conference, Maharashtra Vision : Mission II ,

1st to 3rd May 2007, Mumbai, P. 1

9. T.S.Papole & others, Inter-Regional Disparities in Industrial Growth and structure,

Institute for studies in Industrial Development, New Delhi (Nov. 2011) P. 19.

10. Industrial state profile of Maharashtra 2013-14, prepared by MSME Development

Institute, Ministry of MSME, Govt. of India, Sakinaka, Mumbai-72, P. 27.

11. S.B. Sakhalkar, Maharashtra-Industrial Giant on spring Board of Dynamic

Development an article in the book-Regional Economic Development in India,

edited by susheela Subrahmanya and M.V. Shrinivasa Gowda (1995) P. 461.

12. Unit level data purchased from ministry of statistic & programme implementation


13. Ibid, 14. Ibid, 15. Ibid, 16. Ibid, 17. Ibid.

18. Unit level data purchased from ministry of statistic & programme implementation

regarding

ASI and District level social economic survey published by directorate of economics

and statistics Government of Maharashtra various issues, Data of Maharashtra for

the year 1999-2000 & 2008-2009.

chapter - i industrial profile of maharashtra...

Documents