chapter 9
DESCRIPTION
MANAGEMENT RESEARCH Third Edition, 2008 Prof. M. Easterby-Smith, Prof. R. Thorpe, Prof. Paul R. Jackson. CHAPTER 9. Creating Quantitative Data. Learning Objectives. To be able to select an appropriate form of sampling design for the objectives of the research. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
CHAPTER 9
Creating Quantitative Data
MANAGEMENT RESEARCH Third Edition, 2008
Prof. M. Easterby-Smith, Prof. R. Thorpe, Prof. Paul R. Jackson
Learning Objectives
To be able to select an appropriate form of sampling design for the objectives of the research.
To be able to select among alternative sources of quantitative data according to the purpose of the research, taking into account the benefits and drawbacks of each.
To be able to design structured questions and select appropriate forms of measurement scale.
Principles in designing a sample
Representativeness: the characteristics of the sample are the same as those of the population from which it is drawn. Biased samples are different from the
population. Precision: credibility of a sample, which depends
on: Sample size – bigger samples are more
precise Sampling proportion – what proportion of
the population is sampled
Achieving a credible sample Bias
High Low
Precision
High a) Precisely right
b) Precisely wrong
Low c) Imprecisely right
d) Imprecisely wrong
Probability Sampling Designs
Simple Random Sampling – every entity has an equal chance of being part of the sample
Stratified Random Sampling – divide the population into strata, and take a random sample from each stratum
Systematic Random Sampling – list the entities in the population, and takes every nth (i.e. 27th) entity
Cluster Sampling – divide the population into clusters and then take samples from each cluster
Multi-Stage Sampling – combines several of the above methods
Non-Probability Sampling Design
Convenience Sampling – selection is based on how easily accessible the sample entities are
Quota Sampling – divide the population into relevant categories and take samples until a target quota is achieved in each category
Purposive Sampling – researcher has a clear idea of what the sample unit should be
Snowball Sampling – use respondents to suggest the names of other relevant respondents to approach
The Value of Sampling Designs
Probability Sampling Designs: the researcher knows the relationship between the sample and the population from which it is drawn
Non-Probability Sampling Designs: the researcher can overcome practical problems, where representativeness of the sample is either unnecessary or impossible to achieve
Sources of Quantitative Data - Surveys
Postal Questionnaires – possible to achieve large samples cheaply
Face-to-face Structured Interviews – costly, but can achieve higher quality data
Telephone Structured Interviews – lower cost, and can achieve higher quality data
Web-based Surveys – can achieve large samples cheaply, easy to customise
Sources of Quantitative Data – Observational Data
Types of observation data: Verbal behaviour – words used to
express meaning Non-Verbal behaviour – vocal & visual
ways of conveying meaning Factors affecting observational data:
Observer effects Sampling & coding behaviour
Sources of Quantitative Data –Secondary Data/Databases
Financial databases – e.g. daily share prices, income statements, mergers & acquisitions
Issues in using secondary data: The structure of the database What data are recorded Forming indices & derived variables
The process of measurement
Principles in designing structured questions
Measurement scales for recording responses
Principles in designing structured questions
Each item should express only one idea
Avoid jargon & colloquialisms Use simple expressions Avoid the use of negatives Avoid leading questions
Measurement scales for recording responses
Category scale Nominal scale – categories have no intrinsic ordering Ordinal Scale – categories have an intrinsic ordering Likert Scale – a type of ordered category scale
Continuous Scale Ratio Scale – has a meaningful zero point Interval Scale – has no meaningful zero point
Further Reading
Gunn (2002) ‘Web-based surveys: changing the survey process’, First Monday, 7 (12).
Couper, M.P., Traugott, M.W. and Lamias, M.J. (2001) ‘Web survey design and administration’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 65 (2): 230-53.
Sapsford, R. (2006) Survey Research, 2nd edn. London: Sage.