chapter 7: negligence and strict liability
DESCRIPTION
TWELFTH EDITION. Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability. Clarkson Miller Cross . BUSINESS LAW. TEXT AND CASES. Legal, Ethical, Global, and Corporate Environment. §1: Negligence. Tortfeasor does not intend the consequences of the act or believes they will occur. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062316/568167c4550346895ddd1260/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062316/568167c4550346895ddd1260/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Tortfeasor does not intend the consequences of the act or believes they will occur.
Actor’s conduct merely creates a foreseeable risk of injury.
2
![Page 3: Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062316/568167c4550346895ddd1260/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Analysis:Duty: Defendant owed Plaintiff a duty
of care;Breach: Defendant breached that duty;Causation: Defendant’s breach caused
the injury;Damages: Plaintiff suffered legal injury.
3
![Page 4: Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062316/568167c4550346895ddd1260/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Defendant owes duty to protect Plaintiff from foreseeable risks that Defendant knew or should have known about.A foreseeable risk is one in which the
reasonable person would anticipate and guard against it.
4
![Page 5: Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062316/568167c4550346895ddd1260/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Duty of Landowners to warn invitees, exercise reasonable care.Landlords owe duty of reasonable care
to tenants and guests for common areas such as stairs and laundry rooms.
CASE 7.1 McClain v. Octagon Plaza, LLC. (2008). Can a landlord be liable for negligent misrepresentation about the size of a leased space?
5
![Page 6: Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062316/568167c4550346895ddd1260/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Duty of Landowners (continued). Duty to Warn Business Invitees of
Foreseeable Risks (knew or should have known).
EXCEPTION: Obvious Risks.
6
![Page 7: Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062316/568167c4550346895ddd1260/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Duty of Professionals. Professionals may owe higher duty of
care based on special education, skill or intelligence.
Breach of duty is called professional malpractice.
7
![Page 8: Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062316/568167c4550346895ddd1260/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
No Duty to Rescue.Law requires individuals to act
reasonably, but there is no duty to rescue (or warn, or come to the aid of another), unless there is a special relationship of trust.
However, if rescue is attempted, the law requires due care and follow through.
8
![Page 9: Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062316/568167c4550346895ddd1260/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Even though a Tortfeasor owes a duty of care and breaches the duty of care, the act must have caused the Plaintiff’s injuries. Causation is both:Causation in Fact, andProximate Cause.
9
![Page 10: Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062316/568167c4550346895ddd1260/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Did the injury occur because of the Defendant’s act, or would the injury have occurred anyway?
Usually determined by the “but for” test, i.e., but for the Defendant’s act the injury would not have occurred.
10
![Page 11: Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062316/568167c4550346895ddd1260/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
An act is the proximate (or legal) cause of the injury when the causal connection between the act and injury is strong enough to impose liability.
CASE 7.2 Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. (1928). Were the plaintiff’s injuries foreseeable?
11
![Page 12: Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062316/568167c4550346895ddd1260/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
To recover, Plaintiff must show legally recognizable injury.
Compensatory Damages are designed to reimburse Plaintiff for actual losses.
Punitive Damages are designed to punish the tortfeasor and deter others from wrongdoing.
12
![Page 13: Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062316/568167c4550346895ddd1260/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Assumption of Risk. Superseding Intervening Cause. Contributory or Comparative
Negligence.
13
![Page 14: Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062316/568167c4550346895ddd1260/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Plaintiff has knowledge of the risk, and voluntarily engages in the act anyway.
Defense can be used by participants, as well as spectators and bystanders.
14
![Page 15: Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062316/568167c4550346895ddd1260/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Assumption of the risk can be express or implied.
Express by agreement. Implied by plaintiff’s knowledge of
risks and subsequent conduct. CASE 7.3 Pfenning v. Lineman (2010).
Is the driver of a beverage cart a “participant” at a golfing event?
15
![Page 16: Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062316/568167c4550346895ddd1260/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
A unforeseeable, intervening act that breaks the causal link between Defendant’s act and Plaintiff’s injury, relieving Defendant of liability.
16
![Page 17: Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062316/568167c4550346895ddd1260/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Under common law doctrine of contributory negligence, if Plaintiff in any way caused his injury, he was barred from recovery.
Most states have replaced contributory negligence with the doctrine of comparative negligence.
17
![Page 18: Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062316/568167c4550346895ddd1260/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Comparative negligence computes liability of Plaintiff and Defendant and apportions damages.
Pure Comparative Negligence States (California and New York): allows Plaintiff to recover even if his liability is greater than that of Defendant.
18
![Page 19: Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062316/568167c4550346895ddd1260/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Modified Comparative Negligence States: percent of damages Plaintiff causes herself are subtracted from the total award.50 Percent Rule: Plaintiff recovers only if
liability is less than 50%.51 Percent Rule: Plaintiff recovers
nothing if liability is greater than 50%.
19
![Page 20: Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062316/568167c4550346895ddd1260/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Res Ipsa Loquitur.Facts and circumstances create
presumption of negligence by Defendant.
Burden of proof shifts to Defendant to show he was not negligent.
20
![Page 21: Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062316/568167c4550346895ddd1260/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Negligence Per Se occurs when Defendant violates a statute designed to protect Plaintiff:Statute sets out standard of care.Plaintiff is member of class intended to be
protected by statute.Statute designed to prevent Plaintiff’s injury.
21
![Page 22: Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062316/568167c4550346895ddd1260/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
“Danger Invites Rescue” Doctrine. Good Samaritan Statutes. Dram Shop Acts.
22
![Page 23: Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062316/568167c4550346895ddd1260/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Development of Strict Liability.Theory of strict liability started with
Rylands v. Fletcher (1868 England).Defendant’s liability for strict liability is
without regard to: Fault, Foreseeability, Standard of Care or Causation.
Strict liability based on abnormally dangerous activities is one application.
23
![Page 24: Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062316/568167c4550346895ddd1260/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Ultraharzardous or abnormally dangerous activities:Involve serious potential harm;Involve high degree of risk that cannot
be made safe; andAre not commonly performed in the
community or area.
24
![Page 25: Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062316/568167c4550346895ddd1260/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Wild Animals: Persons who keep wild animals are
strictly liable for injuries caused by the beast.
Persons who keep domestic animals are liable if the owner knew or should have known that animal was dangerous.
25
![Page 26: Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062316/568167c4550346895ddd1260/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Product Liability: manufacturers can be found liable without regard to fault (see Chapter 22).
Bailments: when goods temporarily transferred to another (see Chapter 49).
26