chapter 5 numerical analysis -...
TRANSCRIPT
86
CHAPTER 5
NUMERICAL ANALYSIS
5.1 INTRODUCTION
The failure process of high performance composite laminates is
quite complex, involving damage mechanisms such as matrix cracking, fibre
fracture, interlaminar damage and delamination. Though there are many
failure modes, the delamination gives the measure of the damage area. Some
progress has been made lately in the development of accurate analytical tools
for the prediction of intralaminar damage growth, yet similar efficient tools
for delamination are not available, and thus delamination is generally not
considered in damage growth analysis. Without the delamination failure
mode, the predictive capabilities of progressive failure analysis will remain
limited. However delamination is one of the predominant forms of failure in
laminated composites when there is no reinforcement in the thickness
direction. It is a typical interlaminar failure mode of laminated composite
materials that may arise due to the low resistance of the thin resin-rich
interface existing between adjacent layers under the action of impacts,
transversal loads or free-edge stresses. As a result, impact can cause a
significant reduction in the load-carrying capacity of the structure.
The analysis of delamination is commonly divided into the study of
the initiation and the analysis of the propagation of an already initiated area.
Delamination initiation analysis is usually based on stress and the use of
criteria such as the quadratic interaction of the interlaminar stresses in
87
conjunction with a characteristic distance. This distance is a function of
specimen geometry and material properties and its determination usually
requires extensive testing. Crack propagation, on the other hand, is usually
predicted using the Fracture Mechanics approach. The Fracture Mechanics
approach avoids the difficulties associated with the stress singularity at a
crack front but requires the presence of a pre-existing delamination whose
exact location may be difficult to determine. When used in isolation, either
the strength-based approach or the Fracture Mechanics approach is not
adequate for a comprehensive analysis of progressive delamination failure.
However, most analysis of delamination growth apply a fracture
mechanics approach and evaluates the energy release rates for self-similar
delamination growth. The energy release rates are usually evaluated using the
virtual crack closure technique (VCCT) (Rybicki and Kanninen, 1997). The
VCCT technique is based on the assumption that when a crack extends by a
small amount, the energy released in the process is equal to the work required
to close the crack to its original length. The Mode I, Mode II, and Mode III
energy release rates, GI , GII and GIII respectively, can then be computed
from the nodal forces and displacements obtained from the solution of a finite
element model. The approach is computationally effective since the energy
release rates can be obtained from only one analysis. Although valuable
information concerning the onset and the stability of delamination can be
obtained using the VCCT, its use in the simulation of delamination growth
may require complex moving mesh techniques to advance the crack front
when the local energy release rates reach a critical value. Furthermore, an
initial delamination must be defined; and for certain geometries and load
cases, the location of the delamination front might be difficult to determine.
88
In recent years, a growing interest has emerged in the application of
cohesive zone models to study delamination fractures in composite materials.
Cohesive damage models presume the presence in front of the physical crack
tip of a process zone delimited by cohesive surfaces that are held together by
cohesive tractions. The cohesive tractions are related to the relative
displacements of the cohesive surfaces by a constitutive law that simulates the
accumulation of damage through progressive decohesion in the process zone.
The use of finite elements based on a cohesive damage approach allow to
overcome the main limitations of crack closure schemes. In particular, the
initiation and progression of damage are explicitly incorporated in the
formulation of the element and do not necessitate external node release
routines while requirements on mesh geometry and mesh density are less
stringent than those associated with crack closure techniques.
The delamination incurred to composite plates of various
thicknesses and ply orientation subjected to medium velocity impact with the
use of cohesive zone model is attempted. A numerical simulation was
performed using Abaqus/Explicit, transient dynamic finite element analysis
code. Finite Element models with interface elements were first calibrated and
validated by simulation of simple fracture mechanics tests and subsequently
employed to predict the delamination of (0/90) and (+45/-45) unidirectional
glass fibre/vinyl ester composite laminates subjected to impact.
5.2 FINITE ELEMENT MODEL
ABAQUS is a well regarded finite element commercial code, and it
has a number of material models but all of them are not supported with an
appropriate failure model for its progressive damage which is extremely
important in a fully penetrating impact process considered in the present
study. As the structure has symmetry in both the directions, a quarter of the
panel (Figure 5.1) has been modeled using C3D8R solid elements. An
89
element size of 0.5 mm by 0.5 mm (on the laminate plane) was used in the
highest density region of the mesh. The impactor has been modelled like the
laminated panel and the two separate bodies have been connected through
contact mechanism. In simulation, the impactor has been idealized as a rigid
body, as the deformation of the impactor is always found to be insignificant in
the experiment. The impactor has been modeled as 3D rigid surface using the
4 node 3D quadrilateral element R3D4. The movement of the impactor has
been restrained in all the directions except translation along its axis. The
initial/incidental velocity of the impactor has been specified as the field (a
feature available in ABAQUS) at a reference point (an ABAQUS feature)
defined at the centroid of the impactor. The mass of the impactor has also
been assigned at the reference point. In order to have a simple and
computationally efficient model, the fibre reinforced composite laminates
have been modelled with the options of reduced integration, hourglass control
and finite membrane strains.
Figure 5.1 Finite element model of the (0/90) composite plate
90
Figure 5.2 Finite element model of the (+45/-45) composite plate
The interaction between the plate and the projectile was simulated
by surface-to-surface contact elements connecting the projectile and laminate
surfaces. Cohesive elements are placed at the interfaces between lamina to
simulate the delaminated area. Cohesive elements are based on a Dudgale-
Barenblatt cohesive zone approach which can be related to Griffith’s theory of
fracture when the cohesive zone size is negligible when compared with
characteristic dimensions regardless of the shape of the constitutive equation.
These elements use failure criteria that combine aspects of strength based
analysis to predict the onset of the softening process at the interface and
fracture mechanics to predict delamination propagation. A main advantage of
the use of cohesive elements is its capability to predict both onset and
propagation of delamination without previous knowledge of the crack
location and propagation direction. The zero-thickness C3H3D8 cohesive
elements (Figure 5.3) are used to simulate the resin-rich layer connecting the
several lamina of a composite laminate. In all the cases, it is noticed that the
bottom most layer interface is subjected to maximum delamination.
91
Figure 5.3 Cohesive element with eight nodes
5.3 SIMULATION OF DELAMINATION
In structural applications of composites, delamination growth is likely
to occur under mixed-mode loading. Therefore, a general formulation for
decohesive elements dealing with mixed-mode delamination onset and
propagation is required. Many attempts have been made at describing the
mixed-mode delamination failure response of composite materials. Failure
criterions have been based on stress or strain near the crack tip, crack opening
displacement, stress intensity factor, or strain energy release rate. Strain
energy release rate is a good measure of a materials resistance to delamination
extension and most of the failure criteria that have been suggested can be
written in terms of critical strain energy release rate or fracture toughness.
Delamination in structures is often subjected to mixed-mode loading and
therefore mixed-mode fracture toughness becomes important. Since
delamination will often be subjected to mixed-mode loading and because the
mixed-mode failure response cannot be determined from the pure-mode
toughness’s, it is important that mixed-mode toughness testing be included
during the characterization of a material.
5.3.1 Delamination Initiation
The onset of damage at the interface can be determined simply by
comparing the traction components with their respective allowable under pure
Mode I, II or III loading. However, under mixed-mode loading damage onset
92
and the corresponding softening behavior may occur before any of the
traction components involved reach their respective allowable. A mixed-mode
criterion accounting for the effect of the interaction of the traction
components in the onset of delamination is used. The initiation of the
softening process is predicted using the quadratic failure criterion
(equation 5.1) considering that the compressive normal tractions do not affect
delamination onset.
2 2 2
3 2 1 1N S T
(5.1)
A cohesive element was implemented to improve the delamination
prediction over stress-based criteria. Cohesive elements allow displacement
discontinuities associated with cracks to be explicitly represented. These
elements relate the displacement discontinuity across a crack to tractions that
act across the crack which may be sustained by fibrils in cracked regions,
bridging fibres, friction and other crack bridging mechanisms. Failure of the
cohesive elements is initiated by a mixed-mode quadratic stress-based
criterion involving the normal and two shear stress components (Figure 5.4).
Figure 5.4 Mixed mode traction separation
2 2 2
3 2 1 1N S T
93
This implies that damage will most likely initiate at a stress smaller than the
maximum stress for failure for the individual mode.
5.3.2 Delamination Propagation
Once the damage initiation criterion is reached, the traction
displacement is degraded linearly. The softening behaviour and the traction
separation can be either linear or exponential in ABAQUS and for validation
of a simpler model, a bilinear case was chosen. The softening nature of the
decohesive element constitutive equation causes convergence difficulties in
the solution of the finite element analysis. It is found that when using the
Newton- Raphson method, under load (with the arc-length method) or
displacement control, the iterative solutions often oscillated when a positive
slope of the total potential energy was found, and therefore failed to converge.
Hence, the cylindrical arc-length method is used to obtain converged
solutions. This technique chooses between the alternative roots to the arc-
length constraint, selecting the one involving the minimum residual.
However, even with this technique, the solution sometimes enters a cycle and
oscillates between two points. The oscillation must be detected so that the
increment size can be reduced.
It was also found that when coarse meshes are used, a 'snap-back'
type of behavior might occur. Therefore, in order to obtain a relatively smooth
solution, the mesh should be fine enough to include at least two decohesive
elements in the cohesive zone located at the crack tip. The convergence
difficulties were also overcome by reducing the interlaminar tensile strength
to 40% of the original value whilst maintaining constant fracture energy. The
Mixed-Mode Bending (MMB) test specimen is used to find the mixed-mode I
and II interlaminar fracture toughness.
94
The area under the traction displacement curve or the energy
dissipated at crack propagation is equal to the fracture toughness for the
particular fracture mode. The criteria used to predict delamination
propagation under mixed-mode loading conditions are usually established in
terms of the energy release rates and fracture toughness. For mixed-mode
loading the dependence of the fracture toughness on mode ratio must be
accounted for in the formulation of decohesive elements. In order to
accurately account for the variation of fracture toughness as a function of
mode ratio in thermoplastic composites, the mixed-mode criterion proposed
by Benzeggagh and Kenane (B-K criterion) is used here. The B-K criterion
gives the mixed mode fracture toughness over a comprehensive range of
mode mixity. This criterion is expressed as a function of the Mode I and
Mode II fracture toughness and a parameter obtained by simulating mixed
mode bending tests at different mode ratios. The B-K parameter = 1.87 is
calculated by applying the least-squares fit procedure (Camanho et al 2002) to
the experimental data.
IIIc IIc Ic c
I II
GG G G GG G (5.2)
The progression of damage is monitored by the scalar damage
indicator d, which ranges from the initial value of 0 for the undamaged
interface to the value of 1 which indicates the complete decohesive of the
interface and the physical separation of the upper and lower cohesive
surfaces. The evolution of the variable ‘d’ is controlled by the energy
dissipated as work of separation during the decohesion process.
The solution of the equilibrium equations by an explicit direct
integration method requires the adoption of a time increment smaller than the
critical time-step (which decreases with increasing mesh density and material
stiffness and with decreasing material mass density) in order to ensure the
95
stability of the iterative time-stepping scheme. The size of the time increment
requires special consideration since an excessively small time-step may
render the analysis of a dynamic event extremely intensive in terms of
computing time if the total time-span of the phenomenon is many orders of
magnitude larger than the time interval adopted for temporal integration. It
should also be observed that these elements with reduced integration were
employed in the present study, stabilisation techniques were applied to reduce
hourglassing so as to avoid excessive distortion of elements or structure.
5.4 PREDICTION OF DELAMINATED AREA
The decohesive element numbers are given to user defined
subroutine written in FORTRAN to measure and plot the merged delaminated
area of the last two bottom interfaces in order to find the total delaminated
area of the composite plate. Impacts of different energies were simulated by
imposing the experimental ballistic limit velocities at the instant of contact for
different nose shaped projectiles. The size of the (0/90) and (+45/-45)
composite plates used in this numerical analysis are as shown in the
Figures 5.5 and 5.6.
Figure 5.5 Dimensions of the numerical model of (0/90) composite plate
96
Figure 5.6 Dimensions of the numerical model of (+45/-45) composite
plate
The above procedure is repeated for composite plates of different
orientations impacted by different nose shaped projectiles with their ballistic
limit velocity found experimentally. The delaminated area of the (0/90) and
(+45/-45) composite plates impacted with different nose shaped projectiles is
shown in the Figures 5.7 to 5.12. The Ballistic limit and the corresponding
simulated damage area for (0/90) and (+45/-45) are listed in the Tables 5.1
and 5.2. This analysis indicates that the initial damage consists of a tensile
matrix crack that develops within the distal stack of 0 plies and quickly
propagates towards the boundary of the sample. It is observed that the
amount of delaminated area produced by different nose shaped projectiles is
different for the composite plate having same properties. Also, the orientation
of the fibre in the composite plates has considerable influence on the size of
the delaminated area. The obtained results are compared with the
experimental and analytical model results in Chapter 6.
97
Ogival at 43.3 m/s Conical at 45.4 m/s
Hemispherical at 47.8 m/s Truncated ogival at 52 m/s
Truncated conical at 53.8 m/s
Figure 5.7 Delaminated area of the 3.64mm (0/90) plates at ballisticlimit velocity for different nose shaped projectiles
98
Ogival at 53.7 m/s Conical at 57.1 m/s
Hemispherical at 58.4 m/s Truncated ogival at 59.8 m/s
Truncated conical at 61.3 m/s
Figure 5.8 Delaminated area of the 5.35mm (0/90) plates at ballisticlimit velocity for different nose shaped projectiles
99
Ogival at 61.6 m/s Conical at 65.8 m/s
Hemispherical at 68.8 m/s Truncated ogival at 69.8 m/s
Truncated conical at 72.6 m/s
Figure 5.9 Delaminated area of the 7.1mm (0/90) plates at ballistic limitvelocity for different nose shaped projectiles
100
Ogival at 46.1 m/s Conical at 51.7 m/s
Hemispherical at 52.6 m/s Truncated ogival at 55.4 m/s
Truncated conical at 58.5 m/s
Figure 5.10 Delaminated area of the 3.64mm (+45/-45) plates at ballisticlimit velocity for different nose shaped projectiles
101
Ogival at 60.4 m/s Conical at 63.4 m/s
Hemispherical at 65.2 m/s Truncated ogival at 68.2 m/s
Truncated conical at 69.4 m/s
Figure 5.11 Delaminated area of the 5.35mm (+45/-45) plates at ballisticlimit velocity for different nose shaped projectiles
102
Ogival at 69.9 m/s Conical at 73.2 m/s
Hemispherical at 76.7 m/s Truncated ogival at 78.5 m/s
Truncated conical at 80.8 m/s
Figure 5.12 Delaminated area of the 7.1mm (+45/-45) plates at ballisticlimit velocity for different nose shaped projectiles
103
Table 5.1 Numerical results for (0/90) composite plates
PlateThickness
(mm)
Projectilenose shape
Ballisticlimit, bv
(m/s)
Damage Area,damA
(mm2)
3.64
Ogival 43.3 8252
Conical 45.4 8955
Hemispherical 47.8 9227
Truncated Ogival 52.0 10014
Truncated Conical 53.8 11605
5.35
Ogival 53.7 8907
Conical 57.1 9147
Hemispherical 58.4 10434
Truncated Ogival 59.8 11378
Truncated Conical 61.3 12523
7.1
Ogival 61.6 10667
Conical 65.8 11579
Hemispherical 68.8 14076
Truncated Ogival 69.8 15350
Truncated Conical 72.6 16896
104
Table 5.2 Numerical results for (+45/-45) composite plates
PlateThickness
(mm)
Projectilenose shape
Ballistic limit,bv (m/s)
Damage Area,damA (mm2)
3.64
Ogival 46.1 7197
Conical 51.7 7408
Hemispherical 52.6 8712
Truncated Ogival 55.4 10002
Truncated Conical 58.5 10242
5.35
Ogival 60.4 7343
Conical 63.4 8658
Hemispherical 65.2 9987
Truncated Ogival 68.2 11006
Truncated Conical 69.4 11807
7.1
Ogival 69.9 9609
Conical 73.2 11346
Hemispherical 76.7 12708
Truncated Ogival 78.5 14825
Truncated Conical 80.8 15610
105
5.5 SUMMARY
An efficient numerical model used for the simulation of the
delaminated area has been presented. The commercially available finite
element code ABAQUS has been used for this purpose in which a method for
the simulation of progressive delamination based on cohesive elements is
presented. Decohesive elements are placed between layers of solid elements
that open in response to the loading situation. The onset of damage and the
growth of delamination are simulated without previous knowledge about the
location, the size and the direction of propagation of the delamination. The
mixed-mode criterion is used to predict the strength of composite structures
that exhibit progressive delamination. The numerical model has been applied
to the simulation of glass fibre reinforced plastic laminates having different
orientations impacted by different nose shaped projectiles.