chapter 5 applying consumer theory. 5 - 2 copyright © 2012 pearson education. all rights reserved....
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter 5
Applying Consumer theory
5 - 2 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Topics
• Deriving Demand Curves.
• How Changes in Income Shift Demand Curves.
• Effects of a Price Change.
• Cost-of-Living Adjustments.
• Deriving Labor Supply Curves.
5 - 3 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Figure 5.1 Derivingan Individual’s Demand Curve
26.70
Initial Values
Pb = price of beer = $12
PW = price of wine = $35Y = Income = $419.
W = YPW
- Pb PW
b
Budget Line, L
12.0
2.8
12.0
26.70
p b, $
per
uni
t
e1
E1
I1
Beer (b), Gallons per year
Win
e, (
W) ,
Gal
lons
per
year
(b) Demand Curve Initial optimal bundle of beer and wine
Beer (b), Gallons per year
L1 (pb = $12)
(a) Indifference Curves and Budget Constraints
5 - 4 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Figure 5.1 Derivingan Individual’s Demand Curve
New Values
Pb = price of beer = $6
PW = price of wine = $35Y = Income = $419.
W = YPW
- Pb PW
b
Budget Line, L
Price of beer goes down!
4.3
12.0
2.8
12.0
6.0
26.70
p b, $
per
uni
t
L2 (pb = $6)
26.70 44.5
e2
e1
I1
I2
Beer (b), Gallons per year
Win
e, (
W) ,
Gal
lons
per
year
(b) Demand Curve
Beer (b), Gallons per year
L1 (pb = $12)
E1
44.5
E2
(a) Indifference Curves and Budget Constraints
5 - 5 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Figure 5.1 Derivingan Individual’s Demand Curve
New Values
Pb = price of beer = $4
PW = price of wine = $35Y = Income = $419.
W = YPW
- Pb PW
b
Budget Line, L
Price of beer goes down again!
4.3
5.2
12.0
2.8
12.0
6.0
4.0
26.70 44.5 58.9
p b, $
per
uni
t
L2 (pb = $6) L3 (pb = $4)
26.70 44.5 58.9
e
e1
I1
I2
I3
Beer (b), Gallons per year
D1, Demand for Beer
Price-consumption curve
Win
e, (
W) ,
Gal
lons
per
year
(a) Indifference Curves and Budget Constraints
(b) Demand Curve
Beer (b), Gallons per year
L1 (pb = $12)
E1
2
E2
e3
E3
5 - 6 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Price-Consumption Curve
• A line through optimal bundles at each price of one good (beer) when the price of the other good (wine) and the budget are held constant.
• The demand curve corresponds to the price-consumption curve.
5 - 7 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Solved Problem 5.1
• In Figure 5.1, how does Mimi’s utility at E1 on D1 compare to that at E2?
• Answer: Use the relationship between the points in
panels a and b of Figure 5.1 to determine how Mimi’s utility varies across these points on the demand curve.
5 - 8 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Solved Problem 5.2
• Mahdu views Coke, q, and Pepsi as perfect substitutes: He is indifferent as to which one he drinks. The price of a 12-ounce can of Coke is p, the price of a 12-ounce can of Pepsi is p* and his weekly cola budget is Y. Derive Mahdu’s demand curve for Coke using the method illustrated in Figure 5.1.
5 - 9 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Solved Problem 5.2 (cont.)
5 - 10 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Effects of a Rise in Income
• Engel curve - the relationship between the quantity demanded of a single good and income, holding prices constant.
• Income-consumption curve shows how consumption of both goods changes when income changes, while prices are held constant.
5 - 11 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Y1
Figure 5.2 Effect of a Budget Increase on an
Individual’s Demand Curve
Initial Values
Pb = price of beer = $12
PW = price of wine = $35Y = Income = $419.
W = YPW
- PW
b
Budget Line, L
Pb
Win
e, G
allo
ns p
erye
ar
0
2.8
26.7 Beer, Gallons per year
0
12
0
26.7 Beer, Gallons per year
26.7 Beer, Gallons per year
I1
Pri
ce o
f be
e r,
$ pe
r un
it
Y,
Bud
get
E1
= $419
L1
e1
D1
E1*Income goes up!
$628
5 - 12 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Initial Values
Pb = price of beer = $12
PW = price of wine = $35Y = Income = $419.
W = YPW
- PW
b
Budget Line, L
Pb
Income goes up!
$628
Win
e, G
allo
ns p
erye
ar
0
2.8
4.8
38.226.7 Beer, Gallons per year
0
12
0
38.226.7 Beer, Gallons per year
38.226.7 Beer, Gallons per year
I2I1
Pri
ce o
f be
e r,
$ pe
r un
it
Y,
Bud
get
e2
E1
Y1 = $419
Y2 = $628
L2
L1
e1
D1D2
E1*
E2
E2*
Figure 5.2 Effect of a Budget Increase on an
Individual’s Demand Curve
5 - 13 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Y
Y
Y
Initial Values
Pb = price of beer = $12
PW = price of wine = $35Y = Income = $837.
W = YPW
- PW
b
Budget Line, L
Pb
Income goes up again!W
ine,
Gal
lons
per
year
Income-consumption curve
Engel curve for beer
0
2.8
4.8
7.1
49.138.226.7 Beer, Gallons per year
0
12
0
49.138.226.7 Beer, Gallons per year
49.138.226.7 Beer, Gallons per year
I2I3
I1
Pri
ce o
f be
e r,
$ pe
r un
it
Y,
Bud
get
e2
E1
1 = $419
2 = $628
3 = $837
L3
L2
L1
e1
D1D2D3
E1*
E2
E2*
E3
E3*
e3
Figure 5.2 Effect of a Budget Increase on an
Individual’s Demand Curve
5 - 14 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Solved Problem 5.3
• Mahdu views Coke and Pepsi as perfect substitutes. The price of a 12-ounce can of Coke, p, is less than the price of a 12-ounce can of Pepsi, p*. What does Mahdu’s Engel curve for Coke look like? How much does his weekly cola budget have to rise for Mahdu to buy one more can of Coke per week?
5 - 15 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Solved Problem 5.3
5 - 16 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Consumer Theory and Income Elasticities
• Formally,
where Y stands for income.
• Example If a 1% increase in income results in a 3% decrease in
quantity demanded, the income elasticity of demand is = -3%/1% = -3.
Q
Y
Y
Q
YY
Y
Q
%
%
5 - 17 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Consumer Theory and Income Elasticities (cont.)
• Normal good - a commodity of which as much or more is demanded as income rises. Positive income elasticity.
• Inferior good - a commodity of which less is demanded as income rises. Negative income elasticity.
5 - 18 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Figure 5.3 Income-Consumption Curves and Income Elasticities
• As income rises the budget constraint shifts to the right. The income
elasticities depend on….
• …where on the new budget constraint the new optimal consumption bundle will be
Hou
sing
, Squ
are
feet
per
year
Food, Pounds peryear
Food normal,housing normal
Food inferior,housing normal
Food normal,housing inferior
b
c
e
a
L1
L2
I
ICC2
ICC1
ICC3
5 - 19 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Figure 5.4 A Good That Is Both Inferior
and Normal
• When Gail was poor and her income increased.. …she bought more
hamburger
• But as she became wealthier and her income rose… ….she bought less
hamburger and more steak.
Y2
Y1
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y3
L1
Y,
Inco
me
L2
L3
e2
e3
e1
E2
E3
E1
I1
I 2
I3
Hamburger peryear
Income-consumption curve
Hamburger peryear
yA
ll o
the
r g
oo
ds
pe
re
ar
(a) Indifference Curves and Budget Constraints
(b) Engel Curve
Engel curve
5 - 20 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Effects of a Price Change
• Substitution effect - the change in the quantity of a good that a consumer demands when the good’s price changes, holding other prices and the consumer’s utility constant.
• Income effect - the change in the quantity of a good a consumer demands because of a change in income, holding prices constant.
5 - 21 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Figure 5.5 Substitution and Income Effects with Normal Goods
1CP1
CPC =
Y1 - F
Budget Line, L1
1FP
Budget Line, L2 (increase in salary)
2CP2
CPC =
Y2 - F 2
FP
11FC PP
5 - 22 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Figure 5.6 Giffen Good
When the price of movie tickets decreases the budget constraint rotates out…
allowing the consumer to increase her utility.
Nevertheless, the total effect is negative. WHY?
Bas
ketb
all,
Tic
kets
per
year
Movies, Tickets per year
L1
Total effect
L2
e1
e2
I1
I2
5 - 23 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
• Even though the substitution effect is positive…. …the income effect is larger
and negative (since this is an inferior good).
Bas
k etb
all,
Tic
kets
per
year
Movies, Tickets per year
L1
L*
Income effect
Substitution effect
L2
e1
e2
e*
I1
I2
Total effect
Figure 5.6 Giffen Good
5 - 24 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Inflation Indexes
• Inflation - the increase in the overall price level over time. nominal price - the actual price of a good. real price - the price adjusted for inflation.
• How do we adjust for inflation to calculate the real price?
5 - 25 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Inflation Indexes (cont.)
• Consumer Price Index (CPI) – measure the cost of a standard bundle of goods for use in comparing prices over time.
We can use the CPI to calculate the real price of a hamburger over time.
In terms of 2008 dollars, the real price of a hamburger in 1955 was:
18.1158.26
1.211 burger a of price
2005for CPI
2008for CPI
5 - 26 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Effects of Inflation Adjustments
• Scenario: Klaas signed a long-term contract when he was hired. According to the COLA clause in his contract, his employer increases his salary each year by the same percentage as that by which the CPI increases. If the CPI this year is 5% higher than the CPI last year, Klaas’s salary rises automatically by 5% over last year’s.
• Question: what is the difference between using the CPI to adjust the long-term contract and using a true cost-of-living adjustment, which holds utility constant?
5 - 27 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Figure 5.7 The Consumer Price Index
C2
C1C,
Un
its o
f cl
oth
ing
pe
ye
ar
e2
e1
I1
L1 L2
I2
F, Units offood peryear
Y1/p1F2F1
Y1/p1C
Y2 /p2C
FY2/p2
F
The firm ensures that Klaas can buy the same bundle of goods in the second year that he chose in the first year…
But since Klaas is better off, the CPI adjustmentovercompensates for the change in inflation
1cP1
CPC =
Y1 - F
Budget Line, L1
1FP
Budget Line, L2 (increase in salary)
2cP2
CPC =
Y2 - F 2
FP
11FC PP
5 - 28 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
True Cost-of-Living Adjustment
• True cost-of-living index - an inflation index that holds utility constant over time.
• Question: how big an increase in Klaas’s salary would leave him exactly as well off in the second year as in the first?
5 - 29 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
True Cost-of-Living Adjustment
C2
C1C,
Un
its o
f cl
oth
ing
pe
r ye
ar
e2
e1
I1
L1
e*
L* L2
I2
F, Units of food per year
Y1/p1F2F1
Y1/p1C
Y2 /p2C
Y*/p2C
F Y2/p2F2 FY /p2*
1cP1
CPC =
Y1 - F
Budget Line, L1
1FP
Budget Line, L2 (increase in salary)
2cP2
CPC =
Y2 - F 2
FP
11FC PP
5 - 30 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Table 5.1 Cost-of-Living Adjustments
5 - 31 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
CPI Substitution Bias
• Income adjustments based on CPI suffer from an upward bias.
• The CPI-based adjustment suffers from substitution bias – it ignores that consumers may substitute toward the relatively inexpensive good when prices change disproportionately.
5 - 32 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Labor-Leisure Choice
• Leisure - all time spent not working.
• The number of hours worked per day, H, equals 24 minus the hours of leisure or nonwork, N, in a day:
H = 24 − N.
The price of leisure is forgone earnings.• The higher your wage, the more an hour of leisure
costs you.
5 - 33 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Labor-Leisure Choice: Example
• Jackie spends her total income, Y, on various goods. The price of these goods is $1 per unit.
• Her utility, U, depends on how many goods and how much leisure she consumes:
U = U(Y, N).
• Jackie’s earned income equal:
wH.
• And her total income, Y, is her earned income plus her unearned income, Y*:
Y = wH + Y*.
5 - 34 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Figure 5.8 Demand for Leisure
Budget Line, L1
Y = w1H
Y = w1(24 − N).
Each extra hour of leisure she consumes costs her w1 goods.
Y, G
oods
per
day Time constraint
H1 = 824 0N1 = 160 24
H,Work hours per day
N, Leisure hours per day
H1 = 8
N1 = 160H, Work hours per dayN, Leisure hours per day
I1
L1
w, W
age
per
hour
(b) Demand Curve
–w1 1Y1
w1
e1
E1
(a) Indifference Curves and Constraints
5 - 35 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Figure 5.8 Demand for Leisure
Budget Line, L1
Y = w1H
Y = w1(24 − N).
Budget Line, L2
Y = w2H
Y = w2(24 − N).
w2 > w1
Y, G
oods
per
day Time constraint
H2 = 12 H1 = 824 0N2 = 12 N1 = 160 24
H,Work hours per dayN, Leisure hours per day
H2 = 12N2 = 120
H, Work hours per dayN, Leisure hours per day
Demand for leisure
I2
I11
–w2
L1
L2
w, W
age
per
hour
–w1 1
e2Y2
Y1
w1
w2
e1
E2
(b) Demand Curve
E1
H1 = 8
N1 = 16
(a) Indifference Curves and Constraints
5 - 36 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Figure 5.9 Supply Curve of Labor
5 - 37 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Figure 5.10 Income and Substitution Effects of a Wage Change
Since income effect is positive, leisure is a normal good.Y
, G
oo
ds
pe
r d
ay Time constraint
H2H * H124 0
N2N * N10 24
Substitution effect
Income effect
Total effect
H, Work hours per day
N, Leisure hours per d ay
I2
I1
L2
L*
L1
e2
e1
e*
5 - 38 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Solved Problem 5.5
• Enrico receives a no-strings-attached scholarship that pays him an extra Y* per day. How does this scholarship affect the number of hours he wants to work? Does his utility increase?
5 - 39 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Solved Problem 5.5 (cont.)
5 - 40 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Figure 5.11 Labor Supply Curve That Slopes Upward and Then Bends Backward
Y, G
oods
per
day
(a) Labor-Leisure Choice
Time const raint
H2 H3H124 0
H, Work hours per day
E1
E3
E2
L2
I2
I3
I1
L3
L1
e2
e1
e3
w, W
age
per
hour
(b) Supply Curve of Labor
Supply curve of labor
H2H3H1 240
, Work hours per day
At low wages, an increase in the wage causes the worker to work more….
H
but at high wages, an increase in the wage causes the worker to work less….
5 - 41 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Figure 5.12 The Relationship of U.S. Tax Revenue and the Marginal Tax Rate
5 - 42 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Figure 5.13 Per-Unit Versus Lump-Sum Child Care Subsidies