chapter 4

42
CHAPTER – IV Data Analysis & Interpretation

Upload: manikanta-varikuti

Post on 06-May-2015

527 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chapter 4

CHAPTER – IV

Data Analysis &

Interpretation

STUDY OF RATIO ANALYSIS AT

Page 2: Chapter 4

VISAKHAPTNAM PORT TRUST

1. CURRENT RATIO:

The current ratio is calculated by dividing current assets by current liabilities, as a

conventional role Current ratio of 2:1 or more is considered to be satisfactory. But for service

oriented organization 1:1 is satisfactory.

Current assets = debtors, cash, inventory, bills receivable short term investments.

Current liabilities = Short term bank loan, creditors bills, payable, provisions, bank over draft.

Current Assets

Current Ratio = X 100

Current Liabilities

Year Current assets Current liabilities Current ratio

2005-06 34132.38 32320.68 1.06

2006-07 39866.35 35419.47 1.13

2007-08 81879.49 78575.95 1.04

2008-09 81065.03 73379.22 1.10

2009-10 103005.50 96495.64 1.16

CURRENT RATIO

Page 3: Chapter 4

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-100.98

1

1.02

1.04

1.06

1.08

1.1

1.12

1.14

1.16

1.18

#REF!#REF!Column3

INTERPRETATION:

The ideal ratio for current ratio is 2:1 as the norm in the industry. However

Visakhapatnam port trust is not involved in any manufacturing activity and concerned with

providing service in order to increase the imports and exports. Hence the ratio according for

Visakhapatnam port trust i.e. 1.419 to 1.13 is found to be satisfactory.

2. QUICK RATIO:

Page 4: Chapter 4

This ratio establishes a relationship between quick or liquid assets and current liabilities.

an asset is liquid if it can be converted into cash immediately.

Quick assets

Quick Ratio = X 100

Quick Liabilities

Quick Assets= Current Assets – Inventory

Current Assets = Debtors, cash, inventory , bills receivable, short turn investments.

Year Quick assets Current liabilities Quick ratio

`2005-06 33553.73 32320.68 1.04

2006-07 39143.09 35419.47 1.11

2007-08 81031.40 78575.95 1.03

2008-09 80163.51 73379.22 1.09

2009-10 10232.26 96495.64 0.10

Inventory is nothing but stock.

QUICK RATIO

Page 5: Chapter 4

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-100

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

Series 1Series 2Series 3

INTERPRETATION:

Quick ratio is the ratio of quick assets to current liabilities. A ratio of 1:1 for quick assets

and current liabilities is considered as idle. A very high quick ratio is also not advisable as funds

can be more profitability employed. Higher the ratio higher the short term solvency of the firm.

From the above graph the quick ratio of Visakhapatnam port trust is

satisfactory. It crosses the ideal ratio, however the port had always having higher safety levels

than ideal level.

3. DEBT-EQUITY RATIO:

Page 6: Chapter 4

Debt- equity ratio can be computed by dividing total debt by total owner’s equity.

Total debt = debentures, bank loan, current liabilities, outsiders funds

Total owners equity = share holders fund investment, equity share capital,

preference share capital reserves & surplus

Total debt

Debt –Equity Ratio = X 100

Total owners equity

Year Total debt Owners equity Ratio

2005-06 1594.61 119817.58 0.01

2006-07 1416.61 123873.44 0.01

2007-08 1299.01 152099.21 0.008

2008-09 1480.16 168452.21 0.008

2009-10 1190.68 177493.77 0.006

.

DEBT EQUITY RATIO

Page 7: Chapter 4

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-100

0.002

0.004

0.006

0.008

0.01

0.012

0.014

Series 3Series 2Series 1

INTERPRETATION:

The ideal ratio of Debt-Equity ratio is 1:2.Visakhapatnam port trust is not having any

outside debt except from Government of India. The debt equity ratio of VPT shows decreasing

trend as per the above graph.

4. PROPRIETARY RATIO:

This Ratio has been calculated by considering owners equity and Total assets.

Page 8: Chapter 4

Owner’s equity

Proprietary ratio = X 100

Total assets

Owners equity = share holders fund investment, equity share capital, preference share capital

reserves & surplus.

Year Owners equity Total assets Ratio

2005-06 119817.58 121412.20 0.99

2006-07 123873.44 137269.35 0.90

2007-08 152099.21 153398.22 0.99

2008-09 168452.22 170307.54 0.99

2009-10 177493.77 179564.48 0.99

Page 9: Chapter 4

PROPRIETARY RATIO

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-100.84

0.86

0.88

0.9

0.92

0.94

0.96

0.98

1

Column1Column2Series 1

INTERPRETATION:

The purpose of the ratio is to indicate what position of assets is financed by the share

holders. A ratio of 1 indicates that entity is a debt less one and totally is funded by equity. A high

proprietary ratio indicates the strong financial position of the organization.

The ratio in Visakhapatnam port trust is ranging from 90-99.However there was a decrease in the

ratio during 2006-07 in mainly providing a pension fund.

Page 10: Chapter 4

5. DEBTOR’S TURNOVER RATIO:

Debtor’s turnover ratio can be computed by dividing sales by average debtors.

Sales

Debtor’s turnover ratios = X 100

Average debtors

Here, in VPT sales are considered as operating income.

Operating debtors + closing debtors

And average debtors =

2

Year Sales Average debtors Ratios

2005-06 52845.78 8323.34 6.35

2006-07 53374.60 8222.95 6.44

2007-08 56542.42 6034.64 9.36

2008-09 59972.93 5383.86 11.14

2009-10 66080.18 5902.30 11.19

Page 11: Chapter 4

DEBTOR’S TURNOVER RATIO

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-100

2

4

6

8

10

12

Series 1Series 2Series 3

INTERPRETATION:

Debtor’s turnover ratio indicates the number of times the debtors turned each year. A

high turnover indicates an efficient credit management system and the company is able to

convert its receivables into cash

From the above graph it can be interpreted that the ratio has been increasing for the past

five years i.e. 2006-2010. The debtors turnover ratio is satisfactory due to increase in debtors due

to increase due to increase in govt dues and operating income.

Page 12: Chapter 4

6. AVERAGE COLLECTION PERIOD:

Average collection period can be computed by using the following formula.

Days in a year

Average collection period =

Debtor’s turnover ratio

Year No. of Days in a yearDebtors turnover

ratio

Average Collection

Period

2005-06 365 6.34 58

2006-07 365 6.49 56

2007-08 365 9.36 39

2008-09 365 11.14 33

2009-10 365 11.09 32

Page 13: Chapter 4

AVERAGE COLLECTION PERIOD

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-100

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Series 1

INTERPRETATION:

From the above graph it can be observed that the collection period is in decreasing stage

during last four years. So the collection of the economy is satisfactory.

Page 14: Chapter 4

7. FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER RATIO:

Fixed assets turnover ratio can be computed by dividing net sales by fixed assets.

Net Sales

Fixed assets turnover ratio = X 100

Fixed assets

Here Net Sales = Operating income

Year Sales Fixed assets Ratio

2005-06 52845.78 71680.82 0.74

2006-07 53374.60 69635.54 0.76

2007-08 56542.43 69258.05 0.82

2008-09 59972.93 70260.95 0.85

2009-10 66080.18 72834.58 0.90

Page 15: Chapter 4

FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER RATIO

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-100

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Series 1

INTERPRETATION:

Page 16: Chapter 4

The fixed assets turnover ratio indicates the number of times fixed assets has been fixed over.

The highest the ratio the more efficient has been the utilization of fixed assets. On the other hand

a low turnover ratio might be an indication of over capitalization or inefficient use of fixed assets

From the above graph it can be interpreted that the ratio has been increasing for the past

five years i.e. 2006-10.It indicates that the company is having more efficiency to utilize fixed

assets.

8. GROSS PROFIT RATIO:

Gross profit ratio can be computed by dividing gross profit by sales.

Gross profit

Gross profit ratio = X 100

Sales

Year Gross profit Sales Ratio

2005-06 28535.65 52845.78 54.00%

2006-07 28995.76 53374.60 54.32%

Page 17: Chapter 4

2007-08 28609.11 56542.43 50.60%

2008-09 24985.64 59972.93 41.66%

2009-10 19609.28 66080.18 30.00%

GROSS PROFIT RATIO

Page 18: Chapter 4

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-100

10

20

30

40

50

60

Series 1Series 2Column1

INTERPRETATION:

It reveals the result of trading operation of the business. It measures the efficiency of

production as well as pricing. There is no ideal or standard gross profit ratio. The higher the ratio

is the better the performance of the business.

From the above graph it can be interpreted that the ratio has been decreased in the years

2006-10. That is from 54-30%

9. NET PROFIT RATIO:

Page 19: Chapter 4

This ratio has been calculated by considering net profit and sales.

Net Profit

Net profit ratio = X 100

Sales

Year Net profit Sales Ratio

2005-06 15515.51 52845.78 29.36%

2006-07 12187.90 53374.61 22.83%

2007-08 11143.66 56542.43 19.70%

2008-09 9342.83 59972.93 15.58%

2009-10 12050.89 66080.18 18.23%

NET PROFIT RATIO

Page 20: Chapter 4

INTERPRETATION:

This ratio establishes relationship between sales and net profit and it indicates the

management efficiency in manufacturing, administrating and selling the products.

From the above graph it can be interpreted that the ratio has been decreasing from

the year 2006-2010 ie, 29.36%-18.23%

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-100

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Series 1Series 2Series 3

Page 21: Chapter 4

10. OPERATING RATIO:

Operating ratio can be computed by dividing operating expenditure by

operating Sales.

Operating expenditure

Operating Ratio = X 100

Operating Sales

Year Operating expenses Net salesRatio

2005-06 24310.13 52845.78 46.00%

2006-07 24378.84 53374.61 45.67%

2007-08 27933.32 56542.43 49.40

2008-09 34987.29 59972.93 58.34

2009-10 46470.89 66080.18 70.33%

Page 22: Chapter 4

OPERATING RATIO

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-100

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Series 1Series 2Series 3

INTERPRETATION:

From the above graph it can be interpreted that the ratio has been increasing from the years

2006-10.This indicates that the firm is having a good operating ratio.

Page 23: Chapter 4

11. RETURN ON TOTAL ASSETS RATIO:

Return on total assets ratio can be computed by dividing net profit by total assets.

Net profit

Return on Total Assets Ratio: X 100

Total Assets

Year Net profit Total assetsRatio

2005-06 15515.55 121412.20 12.77

2006-07 12187.90 137269.50 8.87

2007-08 11143.66 153398.22 7.26

2008-09 9342.83 170307.54 5.48

2009-10 12050.89 179564.48 6.7%

Page 24: Chapter 4

RETURN ON TOTAL ASSETS RATIO

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-100

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Series 1Series 2Series 3

INTERPRETATION:

From the above graph it can be interpreted that the ratio has decreased from 2005-06 to

2006-07 the ratio is12.77%-8.84, again the ratio is increased. The main ratio for decrease in ratio

during 2004-05 to 2006-07 is mainly due to creation of liability towards pension fund by

Rs.180.00 crores and Rs. 32.50 crores respectively.

Page 25: Chapter 4

12. NET WORKING CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIO:

Net working capital turnover ratio can be computed by using the following formulae,

SAIES

NET WORKING CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIO = --------------------------- X 100

NET WORKING CAPITAL

Here,

Sales =operating income.

Net working capital=current assets-current liabilities.

Year Sales Net working

capital

Ratio

2005-06 52,845.78 1811.7 29.16

2006-07 53,374.60 4446.88 12.00

2007-08 56,542.42 3303.51 17.11

2008-09 59,972.93 7685.81 7.80

2009-10 66,080.18 6509.86 10.15

Page 26: Chapter 4

NET WORKING CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIO

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-100

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Series 1Series 2Series 3

INTERPRETATION:

The ratio is used to measure the firms liquidity. The ratio measures the firms

potential reservoir of funds

From the above graph it can be interpreted that the net working capital turn over

ratio of Visakhapatnam port trust is satisfactory, because it is a service oriented organization. It

is needed not to maintain current assets more than current liabilities. Maintain equal to current

liabilities. But V.P.T maintains current assets more than current liability.

Page 27: Chapter 4

13. ABSOLUTE CASH RATIO:

The absolute cash ratio is calculated by dividing absolute cash by current liabilities.

Absolute cash=cash in hand + cash at bank + marketable securities.

Current liabilities = short term borrowing + creditors +bills payables + provisions + bank over

draft + o/s expenses + advances received.

absolute cash

Absolute cash ratio = -------------------------- X 100

Current liabilities

Year Absolute cash Current liabilities Ratio

2005-06 7,656.52 32,320.68 0.24

2006-07 8,142.14 35,419.47 0.23

2007-08 41,478.51 78575.95 0.52

2008-09 28089.82 73379.22 0.38

2009-10 38,571.99 96495.64 0.39

Page 28: Chapter 4

ABSOLUTE CASH RATIO

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-100

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Series 1Series 2Series 3

INTERPRETATION:

Service oriented organization like VPT maintains the ratio as per requirement from the

above graph absolute cash ratio of VPT is satisfactory. They maintain cash ratio as per there

safety level. Cash ratio decreased due to decreasing bank balance in the year 2008-09. In the year

2009-10 the cash ratio was 0.39%.

Page 29: Chapter 4

14. CAPITAL EMPLOYED TURNOVER RATIO:

Capital employed turnover ratio can be computed by dividing cost of goods sold by capital

employed.

Cost of goods sold

Capital employed turnover ratio= --------------------------- X 100

Capital employed

Here

Cost of goods sold= operating expenditure.

Capital employed=fixed assets + net working capital

Fixed assets = Goodwill + trade mark + patents + machinery + plant

+ furniture + vehicles + buildings + land.

Net working capital = current assets – current liabilities.

Year Cost of goods sold Capital employed Ratio

2005-06 24310.13 73493.00 0.33

2006-07 24378.84 74082.43 0.33

2007-08 27933.32 72561.57 0.38

2008-09 34987.29 77946.76 0.44

2009-10 46470.89 72561.56 0.64

Page 30: Chapter 4

CAPITAL EMPLOYED TURNOVER RATIO:

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-20100

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

Series 1Series 2Series 3

INTERPRETATION:

From the above graph it can be interpreted that the ratio showing increasing trend, it

refers to more efficient utilization of owners and long term funds. So the capital employed

turnover ratio of Visakhapatnam port trust is satisfactory. Reasons for increasing trend is

increasing consumption of stores, increase in credit balance, decrease in inventory, increase in

liability towards capital expenditure.

Page 31: Chapter 4

15. OPERATING EXPENCES RATIO:

Operating expenses include new minor works, safety and security, dredging charges etc.

this ratio shows the relationship between operating expenses and sales.

Operating expenses

Operating expenses ratio = ------------------------- x 100

Sales

Year Operating expenses sales ratio

2005-2006 24310.13 52845.78 46.00

2006-2007 24378.84 53374.60 45.67

2007-2008 27933.32 56542.43 49.40

2008-2009 34987.31 59972.93 58.33

2009-2010 46470.89 66080.18 70.32

Page 32: Chapter 4

OPERATING EXPENSES RATIO

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-100

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Series 1Column1Series 3

INTERPRETATION:

From the above graph it can be interpreted that the ratio had been increasing from last

3 years due to increase in cargo handling storage expenses, railway working expenses, salaries,

wages, bonus, pension fund etc. so operating expenses of Visakhapatnam port trust is said to be

good..