chapter 13 part 3 drug design optimizing target interactions

122
Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Upload: benedict-morris

Post on 26-Dec-2015

250 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Chapter 13 Part 3

Drug DesignOptimizing Target Interactions

Page 2: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

1. Drug design - optimizing binding interactions

Aim - To optimize binding interactions with target

• To increase activity and reduce dose levels• To increase selectivity and reduce side effects

Strategies • Vary alkyl substituents• Vary aryl substituents• Extension• Chain extensions / contractions• Ring expansions / contractions• Ring variation• Isosteres• Simplification

• Rigidification

Reasons

Page 3: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

2. Vary alkyl substituents

Rationale: • Alkyl group in lead compound may interact with hydrophobic region in binding site• Vary length and bulk of group to optimise interaction

ANALOGUE

C

CH3

CH3H3C

van der Waals interactions

LEAD COMPOUND

CH3

Hydrophobicpocket

Page 4: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Rationale:Rationale: Vary length and bulk of alkyl group to introduce selectivityVary length and bulk of alkyl group to introduce selectivity

2. Vary alkyl substituents

Fit

Fit

NCH3

N CH3 Fit

No Fit

StericBlock

N CH3

CH3

N

Binding region for N

Receptor 1 Receptor 2

Page 5: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Rationale: Vary length and bulk of alkyl group to introduce selectivity

2. Vary alkyl substituents

Example: Selectivity of adrenergic agents for -adrenoceptors over -adrenoceptors

Page 6: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

2. Vary alkyl substituents

Propranolol(-Blocker)

OH

O NH

CH3

CH3H

Salbutamol (Ventolin) (Anti-asthmatic)

HOCH2

HO

HN

CCH3

OH

CH3

H

CH3

Adrenaline HO

HO

HN

CH3

OHH

Page 7: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

-Adrenoceptor-Adrenoceptor

H-Bondingregion

H-Bondingregion

H-Bondingregion

Van der Waalsbonding region

Ionicbondingregion

Page 8: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

ADRENALINEADRENALINE

-Adrenoceptor-Adrenoceptor

Page 9: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

-Adrenoceptor-Adrenoceptor

Page 10: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

-Adrenoceptor-Adrenoceptor

ADRENALINEADRENALINE

Page 11: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

SALBUTAMOLSALBUTAMOL

-Adrenoceptor-Adrenoceptor

Page 12: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

-Adrenoceptor-Adrenoceptor

Page 13: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

-Adrenoceptor-Adrenoceptor

SALBUTAMOLSALBUTAMOL

Page 14: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

SALBUTAMOLSALBUTAMOL

-Adrenoceptor-Adrenoceptor

Page 15: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

SALBUTAMOLSALBUTAMOL

-Adrenoceptor-Adrenoceptor

Page 16: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

SALBUTAMOLSALBUTAMOL

-Adrenoceptor-Adrenoceptor

Page 17: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

SALBUTAMOLSALBUTAMOL

-Adrenoceptor-Adrenoceptor

Page 18: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

SALBUTAMOLSALBUTAMOL

-Adrenoceptor-Adrenoceptor

Page 19: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

SALBUTAMOLSALBUTAMOL

-Adrenoceptor-Adrenoceptor

Page 20: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

-Adrenoceptor-Adrenoceptor

Page 21: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

2. Vary alkyl substituents

Synthetic feasibility of analogues

• Feasible to replace alkyl substituents on heteroatoms with other alkyl substituents

• Difficult to modify alkyl substituents on the carbon skeleton of a lead compound.

Page 22: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

2. Vary alkyl substituents

Methods

O

R'

Drug O

H

Drug O

R"

Drug

Ether

HBra) NaHb) R"I

N

Me

Drug N

H

Drug N

R"

Drug

R R RAmine

VOC-Cl R"I

C

OR

Drug C

OH

Drug C

OR"

DrugO O O

Ester

HO- H+

R"OH

Page 23: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

2. Vary alkyl substituents

Methods

O

C

Drug

O

R

OHDrug O

C

Drug

O

R"

Ester

R"COClHO-

NH

C

Drug

O

R

NH2Drug NH

C

Drug

O

R"

Amide

R"COClH+

C

NR2

Drug C

OH

Drug C

NR2"

Drug

O O OAmide

H+ HNR"2

Page 24: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Binding Region(H-Bond)

Binding Region(for Y)

para Substitution

Bindingsite

HO

Y

meta Substitution

Bindingsite

O

H

Y

3. Vary aryl substituents Vary substituents

Vary substitution pattern

WeakH-Bond

StrongH-Bond(increasedactivity)

Page 25: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

3. Vary aryl substituents

Anti-arrhythmic activity best when substituent is at 7-position

Benzopyrans

6

7

8O

O

NR

MeSO2NH

Vary substituents

Vary substitution pattern

Page 26: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

..

N

O

O

NH2

3. Vary aryl substituents

Notes• Binding strength of NH2 as HBD affected by relative position of NO2

• Stronger when NO2 is at para position

Meta substitution:Inductive electron withdrawing effect

Para substitution:Electron withdrawing

effect due to resonance + inductive effects leading to

a weaker base

..

NO

NH2

ON

O

NH2

O

Vary substituents

Vary substitution pattern

Page 27: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

RECEPTORRECEPTOR

Rationale:Rationale: To explore target binding site for further binding

regions to achieve additional binding interactions

4. Extension - extra functional groups

Unusedbindingregion

DRUG

RECEPTORRECEPTOR

DRUGExtrafunctionalgroup

Binding regions

Binding group

DrugExtension

Page 28: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Example: ACE Inhibitors

4. Extension - extra functional groups

EXTENSION

Hydrophobic pocket

Bindingsite

NH

N

O CO2

O

O

CH3

Bindingsite

NH

N

O CO2

O

O

CH3

(I)

Hydrophobic pocket

Vacant

Page 29: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Example: Nerve gases and medicines

4. Extension - extra functional groups

Notes:• Extension - addition of quaternary nitrogen • Extra ionic bonding interaction• Increased selectivity for cholinergic receptor• Mimics quaternary nitrogen of acetylcholine

Sarin(nerve gas)

O

PF

O(CHMe2)

CH3

Ecothiopate(medicine)

O

PS

N

CH3

H3C

H3C

OEt

OEt

Acetylcholine

ON

CH3

H3C

H3C

CH3

O

O

PS

N

CH3

H3C

H3C

OEt

OEt

Page 30: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Example: Second-generation anti-impotence drugs

4. Extension - extra functional groups

Notes:• Extension - addition of pyridine ring• Extra van der Waals interactions and HBA• Increased target selectivity

ViagraViagraN

N

CH3

S OO

CH3

N

HN

O

N

N

CH3

CH3

N

N

CH3

S OO

CH3

N

HN

O

N

HN

CH3

N

N

N

CH3

S OO

CH3

N

HN

O

N

HN

CH3

N

Page 31: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Example: Antagonists from agonists

4. Extension - extra functional groups

HO

HO

HN

CH3

OHH

Adrenaline

OH

O NH

CH3

CH3H

Propranolol(-Blocker)

NHN

NH2

Histamine

NHN

S

H3CHN

HNC

N

CH3

NHN

S

H3CHN

HNC

N

CH3

Cimetidine (Tagamet)(Anti-ulcer)

Page 32: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Rationale: • Useful if a chain is present connecting two binding groups

• Vary length of chain to optimise interactions

5. Chain extension / contraction

RECEPTORRECEPTOR

AA BBAA BB

RECEPTORRECEPTOR

Binding regions

Binding groupsA & BA & B

WeakWeakinteractioninteraction

StrongStronginteractioninteraction

Chain Chain extensionextension

Page 33: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Example: N-Phenethylmorphine

5. Chain extension / contraction

Optimum chain length = 2

HO

O

HO

N (CH2)n

H

Bindinggroup

Bindinggroup

HO

O

HO

N (CH2)n

H

Page 34: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Rationale:

To improve overlap of binding groups with their binding regions

6. Ring expansion / contraction

Hydrophobic regions

R R RR

Ringexpansion

Better overlap with hydrophobic interactions

Page 35: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Example:

6. Ring expansion / contraction

Binding regions

Binding siteBinding site Binding siteBinding site

Vary nto varyring size

NH

(CH2)n

N

N

CO2O

O2C

Ph

N

N

CO2ONH

Ph

O2CNH

N

N

CO2O

O2C

Ph

I

Three interactionsIncreased binding

Two interactionsCarboxylate ion out

of range

Page 36: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Rationale: • Replace aromatic/heterocyclic rings with other ring systems• Often done for patent reasons

7. Ring variations

General structurefor NSAIDS

X

X

Corescaffold

S

Br

F SO2CH3

N

N

CF3

F SO2CH3

F SO2CH3

DuP697

F SO2CH3

SC-58125

SC-57666

Page 37: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Rationale: Sometimes results in improved properties

7. Ring variations

Example:

Structure IStructure I(Antifungal agent)(Antifungal agent)

Cl

F

C

OHN

N

UK-46245UK-46245

Improved selectivityImproved selectivity

RingRingvariationvariation

Cl

F

C

OHN

NN

Structure I(Antifungal agent)

Cl

F

C

OHN

N

UK-46245Improved selectivity

Ringvariation

Cl

F

C

OHN

NN

Page 38: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Example - Nevirapine (antiviral agent)

7. Ring variations

N

HN

N

O

CO2tBu

Lead compound

N

HN

N N

O

CO2tBu

N

HN

N N

OMe

Nevirapine

Additionalbinding group

N

HN

N N

O

CO2tBu

Page 39: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Selective for -adrenoceptors

over -adrenoreceptors

Example - Pronethalol (-blocker)

7. Ring variations

R = Me AdrenalineR = H Noradrenaline

HO

HO

C

OHH

NHR

Pronethalol

HN

Me

OH

MeH

Page 40: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Rationale for isosteres:

• Replace a functional group with a group of same valency (isostere)

e.g. OH replaced by SH, NH2, CH3

O replaced by S, NH, CH2

• Leads to more controlled changes in steric / electronic properties

• May affect binding and / or stability

8. Isosteres and bio-isosteres

Page 41: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Useful for SAR

Notes• Replacing OCH2 with CH=CH, SCH2, CH2CH2 eliminates activity• Replacing OCH2 with NHCH2 retains activity• Implies O involved in binding (HBA)

8. Isosteres and bio-isosteres

Propranolol (Propranolol (-blocker)-blocker)

OH

OH

NH

Me

Me

Propranolol (-blocker)

OH

OH

NH

Me

Me

Page 42: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Rationale for bio-isosteres:• Replace a functional group with another group which retains the same biological activity• Not necessarily the same valency

8. Isosteres and bio-isosteres

Example:Antipsychotics

Improved selectivity for D3 receptor over D2 receptor

Pyrrole ring =bio-isostere foramide group

Sultopride

EtO2S

OMe

O NH

NEt

DU 122290DU 122290

EtO2S

OMe

NH

NEt

DU 122290

EtO2S

OMe

NH

NEt

Page 43: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Rationale: • Lead compounds from natural sources are often complex and difficult to synthesize• Simplifying the molecule makes the synthesis of analogues easier, quicker and cheaper• Simpler structures may fit the binding site better and increase activity• Simpler structures may be more selective and less toxic if excess functional groups are removed

9. Simplification

Page 44: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Methods:• Retain pharmacophore • Remove unnecessary functional groups

9. Simplification

OH

NHMe

OMe

HOOC

Ph

Cl

Drug

OH

NHMePh Drug

Page 45: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Excess ring

Methods:

9. Simplification

Example:

HO

O

HO

N CH3

HH

Morphine

HO

N CH3

HH

Levorphanol

HO

Me

Me

N CH3

HH

Metazocine

Remove excess rings

Excess functional groups

HO

O

HO

N CH3

HH

Morphine

Page 46: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

YC

X H

Chiraldrug

YC

X H

Chiraldrug

Methods:

9. Simplification

YN

X

Achiraldrug

YC

X Y

Achiraldrug

Remove asymmetric center

Asymmetric center

Page 47: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Methods:

9. Simplification

Notes:• Simplification does not mean ‘pruning groups’ off the lead compound• Compounds usually made by total synthesis

A

OH

OH

NCH3

B

NCH3

OH

OH

C

OH

OH

NCH3

D

NCH3H

OH

OH

GLIPINE

OH

CH3 OH

H3C

NCH3

Simplify in stages to avoid oversimplification

Pharmacophore

GLIPINE

OH

CH3 OH

H3C

NCH3

Page 48: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions
Page 49: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions
Page 50: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions
Page 51: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions
Page 52: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions
Page 53: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Example:

•Important binding groups retained•Unnecessary ester removed•Complex ring system removed

9. Simplification

COCAINE

N

H

O

Me

C

CO2Me

H

O

PROCAINE

C

NH2

O

O

Et2NCH2CH2

Pharmacophore

COCAINE

N

H

O

Me

C

CO2Me

H

O

PROCAINE

C

NH2

O

O

Et2NCH2CH2

Page 54: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Disadvantages:Disadvantages:

• Oversimplification may result in decreased activity and selectivity

• Simpler molecules have more conformations

• More likely to interact with more than one target binding site

• May result in increased side effects

9. Simplification

Page 55: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Target binding site

Page 56: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Target binding site

Page 57: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Target binding site

Rotatable bonds

Page 58: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Target binding site

Rotatable bonds

Page 59: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Target binding site

Rotatable bonds

Page 60: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Target binding site

Rotatable bonds

Page 61: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Target binding site

Rotatable bonds

Page 62: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Target binding site

Rotatable bonds

Page 63: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Target binding site

Rotatable bonds

Page 64: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Target binding site

Rotatable bonds

Page 65: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Target binding site

Rotatable bonds

Page 66: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Target binding site

Rotatable bonds

Page 67: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Target binding site

Rotatable bonds

Page 68: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Different binding site leading to side effects

Rotatable bonds

Page 69: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Oversimplification of opioids

9. Simplification

Page 70: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

MORPHINEMORPHINE

SIMPLIFICATIONSIMPLIFICATION

CC

C

CC

CO

N

Page 71: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

LEVORPHANOLLEVORPHANOL

SIMPLIFICATIONSIMPLIFICATION

CC

C

CC

CO

N

Page 72: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

LEVORPHANOLLEVORPHANOL

SIMPLIFICATIONSIMPLIFICATION

CC

C

CC

CO

N

Page 73: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

METAZOCINEMETAZOCINE

SIMPLIFICATIONSIMPLIFICATION

CC

C

CC

CO

N

Page 74: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

CC

C

CC

CO

N

OVEROVERSIMPLIFICATIONSIMPLIFICATION

Page 75: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

CC

C

CC

CO

N

OVEROVERSIMPLIFICATIONSIMPLIFICATION

TYRAMINETYRAMINE

Page 76: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

CC

C

CC

CO

N

OVEROVERSIMPLIFICATIONSIMPLIFICATION

AMPHETAMINEAMPHETAMINE

Page 77: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Note • Endogenous lead compounds are often simple and flexible • Fit several targets due to different active conformations• Results in side effects

10. Rigidification

Strategy• Rigidify molecule to limit conformations - conformational restraint• Increases activity - more chance of desired active conformation being present• Increases selectivity - less chance of undesired active conformations

DisadvantageMolecule is more complex and may be more difficult to synthesise

Flexiblechain

single bondrotation

+ +

Different conformations

Page 78: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

10. Rigidification

BONDROTATION

O H O2C

RECEPTOR 1

O H

O2C

RECEPTOR 2

O

H

H

NH2Me

ONH2Me

H

H

I

O

NH2Me

H

H

II

O

H

H

NH2Me

Page 79: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Methods - Introduce rings• Bonds within ring systems are locked and cannot rotate freely• Test rigid structures to see which ones have retained active conformation

10. Rigidification

FLEXIBLEMESSENGER

O

H

H

NH2Me

rotatable bonds

RIGID MESSENGER

O

NHMe

H

fixed bonds

Page 80: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

10. Rigidification

HNX

CH3

X NHMe X

NHMe

X

MeN

X

NMe

X

NHMe

Introducingrings

Methods - Introduce rings• Bonds within ring systems are locked and cannot rotate freely• Test rigid structures to see which ones have retained active conformation

Page 81: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

10. Rigidification Methods - Introduce rings• Bonds within ring systems are locked and cannot rotate freely• Test rigid structures to see which ones have retained active conformation

OH

OH

HNCH3

OH

O

HNCH3

Rigidification

Rotatable bonds

Page 82: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Rotatable Rotatable bondbond

Page 83: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Rotatable Rotatable bondbond

RingRingformationformation

Page 84: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

RingRingformationformation

Page 85: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Methods - Introduce rigid functional groups

10. Rigidification

Flexiblechain

C NH

O

'locked' bonds

Page 86: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

N

N

CO2H

O

Ar

N

O

CH3

HN

NH2

III

RigidRigid

Examples

10. Rigidification

Inhibitsplatelet aggregation

N

N

CO2H

NH

HN

NH2 O

O

Ar

guanidine

diazepine ring system

flexible chain

(I)

N

N

CO2H

O

O

NH

HN

NH2

Ar

II

Analogues

Important binding groups

N

N

CO2H

NH

HN

NH2 O

O

Ar

guanidine

diazepine ring system

flexible chain

(I)

RigidRigid

RigidRigid

N

N

CO2H

O

Ar

N

O

CH3

HN

NH2

III

Page 87: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Examples - Combretastatin (anticancer agent)

10. Rigidification

More active

Less active

Rotatablebond

H3CO

H3CO

OCH3

OCH3

OH

Combretastatin A-4

Z-isomerOH

H3CO

H3CO

OCH3

OCH3

OH

Combretastatin

H3CO

H3CO

OCH3

OCH3

OH

E-isomer

Page 88: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Methods - Steric Blockers

10. Rigidification

YX

Flexible side chain

X

Y

Coplanarity allowed

X

Y

CH3

Orthogonal ringspreferred

YX

CH3

steric block

Introduce steric block

X

Y

CH3

H

steric clash

Introduce steric block

X

CH3

Y

Unfavourable conformation

Stericclash

Page 89: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Stericclash

10. Rigidification

Increase in activityActive conformation retained

Serotonin antagonistN

HN

N

O

CF3

OMe

N

H

Introducemethyl group

N

HN

N

O

CF3

OMe

N

CH3

H

N

HN

N

O

CF3

OMe

NCH3 H

orthogonalrings

Methods - Steric Blockers

Page 90: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

Steric clash

10. Rigidification

D3 Antagonist Inactive - active conformation disallowed

free rotation

N(CH2)4

HN

O

CF3O2SO

I

N(CH2)4

HN

O

CF3O2SO

Me

II

H

Methods – Steric Blockers

Page 91: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

NN NNCH3

NN

HHNN

OO

10. Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification

Page 92: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

NN NNCH3

NN

HHNN

OO

10. Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification

Page 93: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

NN NNCH3

NN

HHNN

OO

10. Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification

Page 94: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

NN NNCH3

NN

HHNN

OO

10. Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification

Page 95: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

NN NNCH3

NN

HHNN

OO

10. Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification

Page 96: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

NN NNCH3

NN

HHNN

OO

10. Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification

Page 97: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

NN NNCH3

NN

HHNN

OO

10. Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification

Page 98: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

10. Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification

Planar conformation

Page 99: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

10. Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification

Orthogonal conformation

Page 100: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

CYCLISATION

10. Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification

Page 101: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

10. Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification

CYCLISATION

Page 102: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

10. Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification

CYCLISATIONLocked into planar conformation

Page 103: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

STERIC HINDRANCE

10. Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification

Page 104: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

10. Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification

STERIC HINDRANCE

Page 105: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

10. Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification

STERIC HINDRANCE

Page 106: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

10. Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification

STERIC HINDRANCE

Page 107: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

10. Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification

STERIC HINDRANCE

Locked into orthogonal conformation

Page 108: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

11. Structure-based drug design

Procedure• Crystallize target protein with bound ligand• Acquire structure by X-ray crystallography• Download to computer for molecular modelling studies• Identify the binding site• Identify the binding interactions between ligand and target• Identify vacant regions for extra binding interactions• Remove the ligand from the binding site in silico • ‘Fit’ analogues into the binding site in silico to test binding capability• Identify the most promising analogues• Synthesise and test for activity• Crystallise a promising analogue with the target protein and repeat the process

StrategyCarry out drug design based on the interactions between the lead compound and the target binding site

Page 109: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions
Page 110: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions
Page 111: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions
Page 112: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions
Page 113: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions
Page 114: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions
Page 115: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions
Page 116: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions
Page 117: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions
Page 118: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions
Page 119: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions
Page 120: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions
Page 121: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions
Page 122: Chapter 13 Part 3 Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions

The design of novel agents based on a knowledge of the target binding site

12. De Novo Drug Design

Procedure• Crystallise target protein with bound ligand • Acquire structure by X-ray crystallography• Download to computer for molecular modelling studies• Identify the binding site• Remove the ligand in silico• Identify potential binding regions in the binding site• Design a lead compound to interact with the binding site• Synthesise the lead compound and test it for activity• Crystallise the lead compound with the target protein and identify the actual binding interactions• Optimise by structure-based drug design