chapter 12
DESCRIPTION
Theories of Organizational Communication. Chapter 12. Metaphors for Studying Organizational Communication. machine : highlights rational decision making, concerned with functionality and goals of the organization as a whole - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Chapter 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56816024550346895dcf2ae0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
CHAPTER 12Theories of
Organizational Communication
![Page 2: Chapter 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56816024550346895dcf2ae0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Metaphors for Studying Organizational Communication machine: highlights rational decision making,
concerned with functionality and goals of the organization as a whole
system: highlights interconnection and interdependence within and among subsystems and supersystems and environment
culture: highlights meaning and values, stories, rituals (grounded in local interactions, interpretive)
instruments of domination (critical)
![Page 3: Chapter 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56816024550346895dcf2ae0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Weick’s Theory of Organizing Weick’s work considers the intersection of
organizing and communicating through a consideration of sense-making in the organization context
Difference between social psychology of organizations and social psychology of organizing (not a container in which comm. happens but mutual influence between communicating and organizing).
![Page 4: Chapter 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56816024550346895dcf2ae0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Weick:The Process of Organizing
Enactment processes: Members constitute social environment through a
process of “bracketing”They notice and respond to elements in the
environment (other person’s behaviors or events) that subsequently influence behaviors and then fold back into (constitute) the environment
![Page 5: Chapter 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56816024550346895dcf2ae0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Weick, cont. Selection processes: Sense-making through
selecting, organizing, and framing events to construct meaningEquivocality: multiple interpretations of same
event○ Not too little information coming in, but too
muchSense-making occurs through the use of
recipes (for unequivocal information environments) or through
communication negotiation (for equivocal information environments)
![Page 6: Chapter 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56816024550346895dcf2ae0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Weick, cont. Retention processes: interpretive schemes (recipes)
are stored for future useInterpretive schemes are stored in the form of
causal maps (if I do X, Y will follow)○ Causal maps provide a link back to earlier phases of
Weick’s model○ Stored maps and recipes are the source of culture and
strategy for organizations and identities and continuities of individuals within organizations.
![Page 7: Chapter 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56816024550346895dcf2ae0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Structuration Theory: Giddens Duality of structure –
actions produce and reproduce social structures,
and then are enabled and constrained by those structures
Structure Action
![Page 8: Chapter 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56816024550346895dcf2ae0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Structuration Theory, cont.
Agency: We are active agents who produce and reproduce the social worldWe make rule-guided and creative choices about
how to act. These choices are constrained by our circumstances
![Page 9: Chapter 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56816024550346895dcf2ae0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Structuration Theory, cont. Reflexivity: As agents in the social world,
we can observe what we are doing, give accounts of situations, and act creatively
Dialectic of Control: As reflexive agents, we always have the capacity to make a difference in the social worldwe operate within structures, but are able to
change those structures.
![Page 10: Chapter 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56816024550346895dcf2ae0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Structuration Theory, cont. Structures: Rules and resources that constrain
and enable action in the social world.Rules: Typically unstated and routinized
procedures for how to get things done (more or less durable).
Resources: The capabilities social actors draw on to get things done: allocative (material) or authoritative (status/position)
highly routinized practices = social systems highly routinized rules and resources = institutions
(p. 216 bottom)
![Page 11: Chapter 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56816024550346895dcf2ae0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Structuration Theory in Organizational Communication
Structurational studiesOrganizational form
○ structure = rules and resources that org. members use to coordinate their interactions
Organizational climate○ “intersubjective” and “created through
discourse” (e.g., friendly, competitive)
![Page 12: Chapter 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56816024550346895dcf2ae0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Structuration Theory in Organizational Communication
Studies of organizational communication genres such as memos (email? State Farm)Genre structures influence, but do not dictate
practice Studies of organizational (or professional)
identification and ideologyTransitions during organizational mergersAA group meetings (alcoholic self is both agent
and outcome as it evolves through recursive group practices and individual actions)
![Page 13: Chapter 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56816024550346895dcf2ae0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
The Text and Conversation of Organizing (Taylor) Organizations and communication produce each
other in reciprocal process (in contrast to “container” metaphor or causal view)
Text -- the content of interaction (can be made available through face-to-face interaction or alternative media).
Conversation is the communicative interaction itself—what is happening behaviorally between two or more people.
![Page 14: Chapter 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56816024550346895dcf2ae0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Translation Process:From Text to Conversation
Text is meaning; conversation is activity. Conversation is a string of texts
collaboratively produced Conversation and Text work together in two
“translations” which are:Recursive (reciprocal)Simultaneous
![Page 15: Chapter 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56816024550346895dcf2ae0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Translation Process: (Simultaneous and Recursive)
Translations: One: From text (meaning) to conversation
○ Borrows from speech act theory –illocutionary force or intended “action” of speaker
○ Intent, context, relationshipTwo: From conversation to text (reduce the
conversation to a text or summary)○ Like “episodes” from CMM, or “bracketing” of
events
![Page 16: Chapter 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56816024550346895dcf2ae0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
From Text and Conversation to Organizational Communication
So—how does this apply to organizations? Organizational communication is formalized
through processes of distanciation: Distance between intended meaning of speaker
and what is created and retained from the interaction
![Page 17: Chapter 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56816024550346895dcf2ae0/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
From Text and Conversation to Organizational Communication Degrees of separation:
○ Distance of a particular communication act from original intent of speaker
○ Cycles of movement between text and conversation
○ “Layered objectification” of meaning and interaction in increasingly abstract, formalized and procedural forms
![Page 18: Chapter 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56816024550346895dcf2ae0/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
From Text and Conversation to Organizational Communication The Degrees of Separation
○ 1st degree—speaker intent into conversation○ 2nd degree—conversation translated into
narrative representation.○ 3rd degree—text is transcribed (objectified)
e.g., minutes of a meeting Table 12.2 (p. 222)
![Page 19: Chapter 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56816024550346895dcf2ae0/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Unobtrusive and Concertive Control Theory (Barker, Cheney, Tompkins)
Traditional ways of looking at control: simple control (direct and authoritarian exertion of
power) technological control (physical technology used in
an org.—from assembly line to computer technology)
bureaucratic control (not an individual but of a system of rules that control rewards and punishments)
![Page 20: Chapter 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56816024550346895dcf2ae0/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Unobtrusive & Concertive Control Theory
Barker et al. Identification refers to a sense of connection that
develops between an individual and a social group (e.g., organizations, work groups, and other social collectives)
Discipline refers to using the norms and values of the organization as a guide for behavior
![Page 21: Chapter 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56816024550346895dcf2ae0/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Unobtrusive & Concertive Control Theory
Identification with an organization leads members to adopt (internalize) the organization’s standards
Unobtrusive control occurs when decisions of the individual are premised on organizational values (parallel to “control by consent,” self-censorship)
Concertive control occurs when members of work group reward and punish each other for conformity to group values (similar to peer pressure)
![Page 22: Chapter 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56816024550346895dcf2ae0/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Closing Question What examples of the following types of
control do you see/experience in the graduate program?simple controltechnological controlbureaucratic control concertive controlunobtrusive