chapter 11 © 2006 thomson learning/south-western applying the competitive model

47
Chapter 11 Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South- Western Applying the Competitive Model

Post on 19-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

Chapter 11Chapter 11

© 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western

Applying the Competitive Model

Page 2: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

2

Consumer Surplus

In Figure 11-1, the equilibrium price and quantity are P* and Q*.

The demand curve, D, shows what people are willing to pay for the good.

The total value of the good to buyers is given by the area below the demand curve from Q = 0 to Q = Q* (AEQ*0).

Page 3: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

3

Price

P*

S

D

E

A

B

Quantityper periodQ*0

FIGURE 11-1: Competitive Equilibrium and Consumer/Producer Surplus

Page 4: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

4

Consumer Surplus

Consumers expenditures for Q* are given by the area P*EQ*0.

Consumers receive a “surplus” (total value less what they pay) equal to the area AEP*, which is shaded gray in Figure 11-1.

Page 5: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

5

Price

P*

S

D

E

A

B

Quantityper periodQ*0

FIGURE 11-1: Competitive Equilibrium and Consumer/Producer Surplus

Page 6: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

6

Producer Surplus

At the equilibrium shown in Figure 11-1, producers receive total revenue equal to the area P*EQ*0.

If producers sold one unit at a time at the lowest possible price, producers would have been willing to produce Q* for the payment of BEQ*0.

Thus, producer surplus the the area P*EB shaded in green in Figure 11-1.

Page 7: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

7

Price

P*

S

D

E

A

B

Quantityper periodQ*0

FIGURE 11-1: Competitive Equilibrium and Consumer/Producer Surplus

Page 8: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

8

Short-Run Producer Surplus

The positive slope of the short-run supply curve, S, in Figure 11-1 results from the diminishing returns to variable inputs that are encountered as output is increased.

For production up to Q*, price exceeds marginal cost, so total short-run profits equal the area P*EB less fixed costs

Page 9: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

9

Short-Run Producer Surplus

Producer surplus, the area P*EB, reflects the sum of total short-run profits and short-run fixed costs.

Short-run producer surplus is the part of total profits that is in excess of the profits firms would have if they chose to produce nothing at all.

As such, it is similar to consumer surplus.

Page 10: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

10

Long-Run Producer Surplus

Consider the area P*EB in Figure 11-1 as long-run producer surplus.

It measures all of the increased payments relative to the situation in which the industry produces no output.

The inputs would have received lower prices if this industry had not produced output.

Page 11: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

11

Ricardian Rent

The market equilibrium price and quantity, P*, Q*, are shown in Figure 11-2 (d).

Low-cost farms, Figure 11-2 (a) and medium-cost farms, Figure 11-2 (b), earn long-run economic profits.

Marginal farms, Figure 11-2 (c) earn zero economic profits

Page 12: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

12

FIGURE 11-2 (d): The Market

Price

P*

B

E

S

D

Q perperiodQ*

Page 13: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

13

FIGURE 11-2 (a): Low-Cost Farm

Price

P*

MC

AC

q perperiodq*

Page 14: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

14

FIGURE 11-2 (b): Medium-Cost Farm

Price

P*

MCAC

q perperiodq*

Page 15: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

15

FIGURE 11-2 (c): Marginal Farm

q perperiod

Price

P*

q*

MC AC

Page 16: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

16

Price

P*MC AC

q perperiod

q*

(a) Low-Cost Farm

Price

P*

MC AC

q perperiod

q*

(b) Medium-Cost Farm

Price

P*

MC AC

q perperiod

q*

(c) Marginal Farm

Price

P*

B

E

S

D

Q perperiod

Q*

(d) The Market

FIGURE 11-2: Ricardian Rent

Page 17: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

17

Ricardian Rent

Profits earned by the intramarginal farms can persist in the long run because they reflect the returns to a scarce resource, low-cost land.

Entry can not erode these profits because of the scarcity of the low-cost land.

The sum of these long run profits (P*EB) is the producer surplus ( Ricardian rent).

Page 18: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

18

Economic Efficiency

The competitive equilibrium is efficient in that it produces the largest surplus equal to the sum of producer and consumer surplus.

In Figure 11-1, an output level of Q1 results in a loss of surplus equal to the area FEG. Consumers would be willing to pay P1 for a

good that producers are willing to produce for P2, so mutually beneficial transactions exit.

Page 19: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

19

Price

P2

P*

S

D

E

F

G

P1

A

B

Quantityper periodQ*Q10

FIGURE 11-1: Competitive Equilibrium and Consumer/Producer Surplus

Page 20: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

20

A Numerical Example

The market equilibrium is P* = $6 and Q* = 4. The equilibrium is shown as point E in Figure

11-3. At point E consumers are spending $24 ($6·4).

2.112

1.1110

PQ

PQ

:Supply

:Demand

Page 21: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

21

A Numerical Example

At point E in Figure 11-3, consumer surplus is $8 (= ½·$4·4).

Producers also gain a producer surplus of $8 at point E.

Total consumer and producer surplus is $16.

If price stays at $6 but output falls to 3, total surplus falls to $15.

Page 22: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

22

Price

S

D

E6

10

2

Tapesper period43 51 2

FIGURE 11-3: Efficiency in CD Sales

Page 23: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

23

Price Controls and Shortages

In Figure 11-4 the market initially is in equilibrium at P1, Q1 (point E).

Then demand increases from D to D’. This would cause price to rise to P2

encouraging entry in the short-run. Eventually entry would bring the price down to

P3 and the market would be in long-run equilibrium.

Page 24: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

24

Price

P

1P

3

SS

E

E’

LSP2

Quantityper periodQ1 Q3

D’

D

Q2

FIGURE 11-4: Price Controls and Shortages

Page 25: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

25

Price Controls and Shortages

Suppose the government imposed a price control at the below equilibrium price of P1 when demand increased.

Firms would only supply Q1 and no entry would take place.

Since customers would demand Q4 at this price, there would be a shortage of Q4 - Q1.

Page 26: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

26

Price Controls and Shortages

The welfare consequences of price control can be analyzed using consumer and producer surplus.

Consumers would gain surplus of P3CEP1 (colored in gray) due to the lower price. This is a direct transfer of surplus from

producers to consumers with no gain in total surplus.

Page 27: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

27

Price

P

1P

3

SSA

C

E

E’

LSP2

Quantityper periodQ1 Q3

D’

D

Q4

FIGURE 11-4: Price Controls and Shortages

Page 28: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

28

Price Controls and Shortages

If output had expanded, consumers would gain the area AE’C. Since output is reduced by the price control,

this is a loss of surplus to consumers. Similarly, producers don’t gain the area

CE’E that would have resulted from increased output.

The area AE’E is the total welfare loss.

Page 29: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

29

Tax Incidence

The study of the final burden of a tax after considering all market reactions to it is tax incidence theory.

The incidence of a “specific tax” of a fixed amount per unit of output that is imposed on all firms in a constant cost industry is illustrated in Figure 11-5

Page 30: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

30

Price

P1

P2

SMC MC

AC

Output

(a) Typical Firm

q2 q10

Price

P4P3

Quantityper week

(b) The Market

Q3 Q2 Q1

D

S’S

D’

Tax

LS

0

FIGURE 11-5: Effect of the Imposition of a Specific Tax on a Perfectly Competitive Constant Cost Industry

Page 31: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

31

Tax Incidence

Since for any price, P, consumers pay the firm gets to keep P - t (where t is the per unit tax), the effect of the tax on firms can be shown as a decrease in demand. The vertical distance between the demand curves is t.

It creates a wedge between the consumers’ price, P, and the price firms receive.

Page 32: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

32

Short-Run Tax Incidence

The short-run effect is to decrease output from Q1 to Q2, where firms receive P2 and consumers pay P3 (P3 - P2 = t).

So long as P2 is above minimum variable costs, the firm continues to produce and the tax incidence is shared by consumers, whose price increased to P3, and by firm’s who now receive only P2 rather than P1.

Page 33: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

33

Long-Run Tax Incidence

Firms will not operate at a loss in the long run, so exit will take place shifting the short-run supply curve back to S’.

In the new long-run equilibrium, output will return to Q3 where the firm’s will receive P1 again and consumers will pay P4.

The long-run tax incidence is all on the consumer although the firms pays the tax.

Page 34: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

34

Long-Run Incidence with Increasing Costs

When the long-run supply curve has a positive slope, both consumers and firms pay a portion of the tax.

The imposition of the tax shifts the long-run demand curve inward to D’ (as shown in Figure 11-6) which causes the price to fall from P1 to P2 as some firms exit and input prices fall.

Page 35: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

35

Price

P

2

P3

P1

Quantityper periodQ2 Q1

D

LS

A

B E1

E2

D’

Tax

FIGURE 11-6: Tax Incidence in an Increasing Cost Industry

Page 36: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

36

Long-Run Incidence with Increasing Costs

Consumers pay a portion of the tax since the gross price of P3 exceeds the pre-tax price.

Total tax collection is the gray area P3ARE2P2.

The inputs to the firm pay the remainder of the tax as they are not paid based on a lower net price of P2.

Page 37: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

37

Incidence and Elasticity

The economic actor who has the most elastic curve will be able to avoid more of the tax leaving the actor with the more inelastic curve to pay most of the tax. If demand is relatively inelastic and supply is

elastic, demanders will pay most of the tax. If supply is relatively inelastic and demand is

elastic, suppliers will pay most of the tax.

Page 38: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

38

Taxation and Efficiency

In Figure 11-6, the total loss of consumer surplus is the area P3AE1P1.

The area P3ABP1 is transferred into tax revenue and the area AE1B is simply lost.

The loss in producer surplus is P1E1E2P2 of which P1BE2P2 is tax revenue and BE1E2 lost.

Page 39: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

39

Gains from International Trade

Figure 11-7 shows the domestic demand and supply curves for a particular good, say shoes.

Without international trade, the equilibrium price and quantity would be PD, QD.

If the world shoe price is PW, the opening of trade will cause prices to fall causing quantity to increase to Q1.

Page 40: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

40

Gains from International Trade

The quantity supplied by domestic producers will fall to Q2 with shoe imports of Q1 - Q2.

Consumer surplus increases by the area PDE0E1PW. Part, PDE0APW, comes as a transfer from

domestic producers, and the rest is an unambiguous gain in welfare (E0E1A).

Page 41: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

41

Price

PW

PD

Quantityper periodQ

2Q

1

E1

E0

QD

D

A

LS

FIGURE 11-7: Opening of International Trade Increases Total Welfare

Page 42: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

42

Tariff Protection

Producers will resist their losses, and since the loss is spread over fewer producers than the gain for consumers, they have a stronger incentive to organize for trade protection.

A major trade protection is a tariff which is a tax on an imported good.

Effects of a tariff are shown in Figure 11-8.

Page 43: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

43

Price

PW

PR

Quantityper periodQ2 Q3 Q1

E1

E2

Q4

D

B

A C F

LS

FIGURE 11-8: Effects of a Tariff

Page 44: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

44

Tariff Protection

Compared to the free trade equilibrium E1, the imposition of a per-unit tariff in the amount of t raises the effective price to PW + t = PR. Quantity demanded falls to Q3 while domestic

production expands to Q4.

Tariff revenue is the area BE2FC, equal to t(Q3 - Q4).

Page 45: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

45

Tariff Protection

Total consumer surplus is reduced by the area PRE2E1PW. Part becomes tariff revenue and part is

transferred into domestic producer’s surplus (area PRBAPW).

The two colored triangles BCA and E2E1F represent losses that are not transferred; these are the deadweight losses from the tariff.

Page 46: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

46

Other Types of Trade Protection

A quota that limits imports to Q3 - Q4 (in Figure 11-8) would have a similar effect to a tariff. Market price would rise to PR. Consumer surplus would be transferred to

domestic producers (area PRBAPW). A deadweight loss equal to the areas of the

colored triangles would also occur.

Page 47: Chapter 11 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Applying the Competitive Model

47

Other Types of Trade Protection

However, with a quota, no tax revenue is generated. The area BE2FC can go to foreign producers

or to windfall gains to owners of import licenses.

Nonquantitative restrictions such as health or other inspections also impose costs like a a tariff on imports, and can be analyzed in a similar manner using Figure 11-8.