chap six (2)

Upload: rayhanhere

Post on 03-Apr-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    1/116

    Copyright 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Chapter 6

    Process Costingand Hybrid

    Product-Costing Systems

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    2/116

    Copyright 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    LearningObjective

    1

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    3/116

    Job-Costing and Process Costing:Opposite Ends of a Continuum

    Job-Costing Systems

    Distinct, identifiableunits of a product

    or service

    Examples:

    Custom-mademachines,Houses

    Process-CostingSystems

    Masses of identicalor similar units of aproduct or service

    Examples:Food,Chemical processing

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    4/116

    1-4

    Comparison of Job-Order Costingand Process Costing

    ProcessCosting

    ProcessCosting

    Job-orderCosting

    Used for production of small,identical, low cost items.

    Mass produced in automatedcontinuous production process.

    Costs cannot be directly traced toeach unit of product.

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    5/116

    1-5

    ProcessCosting

    ProcessCosting

    Job-orderCosting

    Typical process cost applications:

    Petrochemical refinery

    Paint manufacturer

    Paper mill

    Comparison of Job-Order Costingand Process Costing

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    6/116

    Similarities in Job Order and Process Costing

    determine a product cost by measuring theamount of direct materials and direct laborused and allocating overhead costs.

    allocate overhead using a predeterminedoverhead rate (or activity-based costing).

    maintain perpetual inventory records with

    subsidiary ledgers formaterials, work inprocess, and finished goods.

    Both systems:

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    7/116

    1-7

    Job-order costing

    Costs accumulated bythe job.

    Work in process has ajob-cost sheet for eachjob.

    Many unique, high costjobs.

    Jobs built to customerorder.

    Process costing

    Costs accumulated bydepartment orprocess.

    Work in process has aproduction report foreach batch ofproducts.

    A few identical, low costproducts.

    Units continuouslyproduced for inventoryin automated process.

    Comparison of Job-Order Costingand Process Costing

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    8/116

    Job Order Cost System

    Job Order and Process Cost Systems Compared

    Job CostSheets

    Dept. A andDept. B

    Direct materials

    Direct labor

    Factory overhead

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    9/116

    Job Order Cost System

    Job Order and Process Cost Systems Compared

    Job CostSheets

    Dept. A andDept. B

    Direct materials

    Direct labor

    Factory overhead

    Finishedgoods

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    10/116

    Job Order Cost System

    Job Order and Process Cost Systems Compared

    Job CostSheets

    Dept. A andDept. B

    Process Cost System

    Direct materials

    Direct labor

    Factory overhead

    Finishedgoods

    Dept. A Dept. BDirect

    materials

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    11/116

    Job Order Cost System

    Job Order and Process Cost Systems Compared

    Job CostSheets

    Dept. A andDept. B

    Process Cost System

    Direct materials

    Direct labor

    Factory overhead

    Finishedgoods

    Dept. A Dept. B

    Factoryoverhead

    Directlabor

    Direct

    materials

    Factoryoverhead

    Directlabor

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    12/1161-12

    Direct Material

    FinishedGoods

    Cost ofGoodsSold

    Direct Labor

    ManufacturingOverhead

    Jobs

    The work-in-processaccount consists ofindividualjobs in a

    job-ordercost system.

    Differences Between Job-Orderand Process Costing

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    13/1161-13

    Direct Material

    FinishedGoods

    Cost ofGoodsSold

    Products

    The work-in-processaccount consists of

    individual products in aprocess cost system.

    Differences Between Job-Orderand Process Costing

    Direct Labor& Overhead

    (Conversion)

    When direct labor is a relatively small amountcompared to material and overhead, it is often

    combined with overhead.

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    14/116Copyright 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    LearningObjective

    2

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    15/116

    Process-Costing

    Process-costing is a system where the unit cost of aproduct or service is obtained by assigning totalcosts to many identical or similar units

    Each unit receives the same or similar amounts of

    direct materials costs, direct labor costs, andmanufacturing overhead

    Unit costs are computed by dividing total costs

    incurred by the number of units of output from theproduction process

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    16/116

    Process-Costing Assumptions

    Direct Materials are added at the beginningof the production process, or at the start ofwork in a subsequent department down the

    assembly line Conversion Costs are added equally along

    the production process

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    17/116

    Five-Step Process-Costing Allocation

    1. Summarize the flow of physical units ofoutput

    2. Compute output in terms of equivalent

    units3. Compute cost per equivalent unit

    4. Summarize total costs to account for

    5. Assign total costs to units completed andto units in ending Work-in-Process

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    18/116

    Flow of Costs in a Process Cost System

    FOH Melting WIP Melting Finished Goods

    FOH Casting WIP Casting

    Cost of Goods Sold

    DM

    DL

    Actualcosts

    incurred

    Actualcosts

    incurred DL

    Direct materials used in productionDM

    Direct labor used in productionDL

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    19/116

    Flow of Costs in a Process Cost System

    FOH Melting WIP Melting Finished Goods

    FOH Casting WIP Casting

    Cost of Goods Sold

    DM

    DL

    FOHA

    Actualcosts

    incurred

    Actualcosts

    incurred

    FOHA

    FOHA

    FOHA

    DL

    Factory overhead applied to work in processFOHA

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    20/116

    Flow of Costs in a Process Cost System

    FOH Melting WIP Melting Finished Goods

    FOH Casting WIP Casting

    Cost of Goods Sold

    DM

    DL

    FOHA

    Actualcosts

    incurred

    Actualcosts

    incurred

    FOHA

    FOHA

    TRANFOHA

    DL

    TRAN

    Cost of goods transferred to WIP CastingTRAN

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    21/116

    Flow of Costs in a Process Cost System

    FOH Melting WIP Melting Finished Goods

    FOH Casting WIP Casting

    Cost of Goods Sold

    DM

    DL

    FOHA

    COGMActualcosts

    incurred

    Actualcosts

    incurred

    FOHA

    FOHA

    TRAN COGMFOHA

    DL

    TRAN

    Cost of goods manufactured and transferred to finished goodsCOGM

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    22/116

    Flow of Costs in a Process Cost System

    FOH Melting WIP Melting Finished Goods

    FOH Casting WIP Casting

    Cost of Goods Sold

    SOLD

    DM

    DL

    FOHA

    COGM SOLDActualcosts

    incurred

    Actualcosts

    incurred

    FOHA

    FOHA

    TRAN COGMFOHA

    DL

    TRAN

    Finished goods soldSOLD

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    23/1161-23

    Process Cost Flows

    Direct material

    Direct labor

    Applied manufacturing and transferred to during currentoverhead finished goods period

    Cost of goods completed Cost of goods sold

    Work-in-Process Finished Goods

    Cost of Goods Sold

    One Production Department

    Inventory Inventory

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    24/1161-24

    Process Cost Flows

    Direct material

    Direct labor

    Applied manufacturing transferred to and transferred to

    overhead department B finished goods

    Direct material

    Direct labor

    Applied manufacturing

    overhead

    during current period

    Cost of goods sold

    Cost of goods completed

    in department A and Cost of goods completed

    Finished Goods Inventory Cost of Goods Sold

    Two Sequential Production Departments

    Work-in-Process Inventory Work-in-Process InventoryProduction Department A Production Department B

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    25/116

    Copyright 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Learning

    Objective3

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    26/116

    Inventories of Partially Processed Materials

    A. Often, partially processed materialsremain in various stages of productionin a department at the end of a period.

    In this case, the costs in process mustbe allocated between the units thathave been completed and transferredto the next process or to finished

    goods and those units that are onlypartially completed and remain withinthe department.

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    27/116

    Inventories of Partially Processed Materials

    B. To allocate direct materials andtransferred costs between the outputcompleted and transferred to the next

    process and the inventory of partiallycompleted goods within thedepartment, it is necessary todetermine the manner in which

    materials are placed in production.

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    28/116

    Inventories of Partially Processed Materials

    1. All materials may be introduced when

    the work begins on a product.

    2. For other products, materials may beadded to production uniformly

    throughout the production process.3. In still other situations, materials may

    enter the production process at

    relatively few points, which may ormay not be evenly spaced throughoutthe process.

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    29/116

    Inventories of Partially Processed Materials

    C. To allocate processing costs betweenthe output completed and transferredto the next process and the inventoryof goods within the process, it is

    necessary to determine the number ofequivalent units of production duringthe period.

    D. The equivalent units of production arethe number of units that could havebeen manufactured from start to finishduring the period .

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    30/116

    Inventories of Partially Processed Materials

    E. The conversion cost per equivalentunit is computed by dividing the sumof the direct labor and factory

    overhead costs for the period by thenumber of equivalent units ofproduction for the period.

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    31/116

    Equivalent Units

    A derived amount of output units that:1. Takes the quantity of each input in units

    completed and in unfinished units of work inprocess and

    2. converts the quantity of input into the amountof completed output units that could beproduced with that quantity of input

    Are calculated separately for each input(direct materials and conversion cost)

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    32/116

    1-32

    Equivalent Units: A Key Concept

    Costs are accumulated for a period of time forproducts in work-in-process inventory.

    Products in work-in-process inventory at thebeginning and end of the period are onlypartially complete.

    Equivalent units is a concept expressing

    these partially completed products as asmaller number of fully completed products.

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    33/116

    1-33

    Equivalent Units Example

    Two one-half completed products areequivalent to one completed product.

    So, 10,000 units 70 percent completeare equivalent to 7,000 complete units.

    + = l

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    34/116

    1-34

    For the current period, Jones started15,000 units and completed 10,000 units,leaving 5,000 units in process 30 percent

    complete. How many equivalent units ofproduction did Jones have for the period?

    a. 10,000

    b. 11,500c. 13,500

    d. 15,000

    Equivalent Units Question 1

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    35/116

    1-35

    For the current period, Jones started15,000 units and completed 10,000 units,leaving 5,000 units in process 30 percent

    complete. How many equivalent units ofproduction did Jones have for the period?

    a. 10,000

    b. 11,500c. 13,500

    d. 15,000

    10,000 units + (5,000 units .30)

    = 11,500 equivalent units

    Equivalent Units Question 1

    C l l ti d U i E i l t

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    36/116

    1-36

    Calculating and Using EquivalentUnits of Production

    To calculate the cost perequivalent unit for the period:

    Cost perequivalent

    unit

    =Costs for the period

    Equivalent units for the period

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    37/116

    1-37

    If Jones incurred $27,600 inproduction costs for the 11,500equivalent units. What was Joness

    cost per equivalent unit for the period?a. $1.84

    b. $2.40

    c. $2.76d. $2.90

    Equivalent Units Question 2

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    38/116

    1-38

    If Jones incurred $27,600 inproduction costs for the 11,500equivalent units. What was Joness

    cost per equivalent unit for the period?a. $1.84

    b. $2.40

    c. $2.76d. $2.90

    Equivalent Units Question 2

    $27,600 11,500 equivalent units

    = $2.40 per equivalent unit

    C l l ti d U i E i l t

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    39/116

    1-39

    Calculating and Using EquivalentUnits of Production

    To calculate the direct materials and conversioncosts per equivalent unit for the period:

    Materialscost per

    equivalentunit

    =Materials cost for the period

    Materials equivalent units for

    the period

    Conversioncost per

    equivalentunit

    =Conversion cost for the period

    Conversion equivalent units for

    the period

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    40/116

    Steps 1 & 2 Illustrated

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    41/116

    Steps 3, 4 & 5, Illustrated

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    42/116

    General Ledger Cost FlowsIllustrated

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    43/116

    1-43

    Departmental Production Report

    ProductionReport

    Analysis ofphysical flow

    of units.

    Calculationof equivalent

    units.

    Computationof unit costs.

    Analysis oftotal costs.

    W i ht d A

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    44/116

    Weighted-AverageProcess-Costing Method

    Calculates cost per equivalent unit of allwork done to date (regardless of theaccounting period in which it was done)

    Assigns this cost to equivalent unitscompleted & transferred out of the process,and to incomplete units in still in-process

    W i ht d A

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    45/116

    Weighted-AverageProcess-Costing Method

    Weighted-average costs is the total of allcosts in the Work-in-Process Accountdivided by the total equivalent units of work

    done to date The beginning balance of the Work-in-

    Process account (work done in a prior

    period) is blended in with current periodcosts

    Equivalent Units of Production

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    46/116

    1-46

    Equivalent Units of ProductionWeighted-Average Method

    The weighted-average method . . .

    Makes no distinction between work done in theprior period and work done in the current period.

    Blends together units and costs from the priorperiod and the current period.

    The FIFO method is a morecomplex method and israrely used in practice.

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    47/116

    Inventories of Partially Processed Materials

    1. For example, if 1,000 units are 50%

    complete at the end of a period, theequivalent units of production would be 500units (1,000*50%).

    2. The computation of equivalent units ofproduction for a period is equal to the sumof the equivalent units of production forcompletion of the beginning work in process

    inventory plus the units started andcompleted during the period plus theequivalent units of production in work inprocess inventory at the end of the period.

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    48/116

    Inventories of Partially Processed Materials

    Inventory within Polishing department on March 1

    Completed in polishing department and transferred to

    finished goods during March

    Inventory within polishing department on March 31

    600 units1/3

    completed

    9,800 units,completed

    800 units,2/5

    completed

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    49/116

    Equivalent Unit Of ProductionWeighted Average

    The equivalent units of production are determined as follows:

    To process units in inventory on March 1 (600 unit) degree of

    completion is not considered

    To process units started and completed in March (9,800units600 units)

    To process units in inventory on March 31(800 units * 2/5 )

    Equivalent units of production in March,

    600

    9,200

    320

    10,120

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    50/116

    Inventories of Partially Processed Materials

    Account WORK IN PROCESSPOLISHING DEPARTMENT Account

    Balance

    Date Item Debit Credit Debit Credit

    May1 Bal.600 units%

    completed

    10,200

    May 1-

    31

    Sanding dept. 10,000

    units at $ 16

    160,000 170,200

    May31 Direct labor 26,640 196,840

    May31 Factory overhead 18,000 214,840

    May31 Goods finished, 9.800

    units

    200,609.486

    May31 Bal. 800 units, 2/5

    completed

    14,230.514

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    51/116

    Inventories of Partially Processed Materials

    600 units:

    9, 200 units

    9, 800 units: 9,800 @20.47035573 $ 200,609.486

    Goods Finished During March

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    52/116

    Inventories of Partially Processed Materials

    800

    units:

    800

    units:

    Materials cost in March, at

    $ 16 per unit

    Conversion cost in March:

    800 * 2/5, or 320 at

    $4.47035573

    Polishing department

    inventory on March 31

    Total Cost accounted for

    $ 12,800.000

    1, 430.514

    $14,230.514

    $214,840.00

    Polishing Department Inventory on March 31

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    53/116

    Steps 1 & 2 Illustrated

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    54/116

    Steps 3, 4 & 5 Illustrated

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    55/116

    Result of the Process

    Two critical figures arise out of Step Five ofthe cost allocation process:

    1. The amount of the Journal Entry transferring

    the allocated cost of units completed and sentfrom Work-in-Process Inventory to FinishedGoods Inventory

    2. The ending balance of the Work-in-Process

    Inventory account that will appear on theBalance Sheet

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    56/116

    1-56

    MVP Sports Equipment Company makes baseball glovesin two departments, Cutting and Stitching.

    MVP uses the weighted-average cost procedure.

    Material is added at the beginning of the CuttingDepartment, and conversion is incurred uniformlythroughout the process.

    Using the following information for the month of March,

    lets prepare a production report for the CuttingDepartment.

    Production Report Example

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    57/116

    1-57

    Work in process, March 1: 20,000 units Cost

    Materials: 100% complete. $ 50,000Conversion: 10% complete. 7,200

    Units started into production in March: 30,000 unitsUnits completed and transferred out in March: 40,000 units

    Work in process, March 31: 10,000 unitsMaterials 100% complete.

    Conversion 50% complete.

    Costs incurred during March

    Materials cost 90,000

    Conversion costs:

    Direct labor $ 86,000Applied manufacturing overhead 107,500

    Total conversion costs 193,500

    Total costs to account for $ 340,700

    Production Report Example

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    58/116

    1-58

    Analysis of Physical Flow of Units

    Physical

    Units

    Work in process, March 1 20,000

    Units started during March 30,000

    Total units to account for 50,000

    Units completed and transferred out during March 40,000

    Work in process, March 31 10,000Total units accounted for 50,000

    Production Report Example

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    59/116

    1-59

    Conversion Equivalent Units

    Physical Percentage Direct

    Units Complete Material Conversion

    Work in process, March 1 20,000 10%

    Units started during March 30,000

    Total units to account for 50,000

    Units completed and transferred 40,000 100% 40,000 40,000

    Work in process, March 31 10,000 50% 10,000 5,000

    Total units accounted for 50,000

    Total equivalent units 50,000 45,000

    Production Report Example

    Calculation of Equivalent Units

    50% of 10,000 units

    Beginning inventory % is not used in weighted-average method.

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    60/116

    1-60

    Conversion Equivalent Units

    Physical Percentage Direct

    Units Complete Material Conversion

    Work in process, March 1 20,000 10%

    Units started during March 30,000

    Total units to account for 50,000

    Units completed and transferred 40,000 100% 40,000 40,000Work in process, March 31 10,000 50% 10,000 5,000

    Total units accounted for 50,000

    Total equivalent units 50,000 45,000

    Production Report Example

    Calculation of Equivalent Units

    100% of 10,000 units, allmaterial added at beginning

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    61/116

    Copyright 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Learning

    Objective4

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    62/116

    1-62

    Direct

    Material Conversion Total

    Work in Process, March 1 50,000$ 7,200$ 57,200$Costs incurred during March 90,000 193,500 283,500

    Total costs to account for 140,000$ 200,700$ 340,700$

    Equivalent units 50,000 45,000

    Cost per equivalent unit 2.80$ 4.46$ 7.26$

    Computation of unit costs

    Production Report Example

    $140,000 50,000 equivalent units

    $200,700 45,000 equivalent units

    $2.80 + $4.46

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    63/116

    Copyright 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Learning

    Objective5

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    64/116

    1-64

    Production Report Example

    Analysis of total costsCost of goods completed and transferred during March

    40,000 units x $7.26 per equivalent unit 290,400$

    Costs remaining in work-in-process on March 31Direct Material:

    10,000 equivalent units x $2.80 per equivalent unit 28,000$

    Convserion:

    5,000 equivalent units x $4.46 per equivalent unit 22,300

    Total cost of March 31 work-in-process 50,300Total costs accounted for 340,700$

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    65/116

    1-65

    Production Report Example

    Analysis of total costsCost of goods completed and transferred during March

    40,000 units x $7.26 per equivalent unit 290,400$

    Costs remaining in work-in-process on March 31Direct Material:

    10,000 equivalent units x $2.80 per equivalent unit 28,000$

    Convserion:

    5,000 equivalent units x $4.46 per equivalent unit 22,300

    Total cost of March 31 work-in-process 50,300Total costs accounted for 340,700$

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    66/116

    1-66

    Production Report Example

    Analysis of total costsCost of goods completed and transferred during March

    40,000 units x $7.26 per equivalent unit 290,400$

    Costs remaining in work-in-process on March 31Direct Material:

    10,000 equivalent units x $2.80 per equivalent unit 28,000$

    Convserion:

    5,000 equivalent units x $4.46 per equivalent unit 22,300

    Total cost of March 31 work-in-process 50,300

    Total costs accounted for 340,700$

    All costsaccounted for

    First-in First-Out

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    67/116

    First-in, First-OutProcess-Costing Method

    Assigns the cost of the previous accounting periodsequivalent units in beginning work-in-processinventory to the first units completed and transferredout of the process

    Assigns the cost of equivalent units worked onduring the current period first to complete beginninginventory, next to stat and complete new units, andlastly to units in ending work-in-process inventory

    First-in First-Out

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    68/116

    First in, First OutProcess-Costing Method

    The beginning balance of the Work-in-Process account (work done in a priorperiod) is kept separate from current period

    costs

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    69/116

    1-69

    MVP Sports Equipment Company makes baseball glovesin two departments, Cutting and Stitching.

    MVP uses the First-In First-Out cost procedure.

    Material is added at the beginning of the CuttingDepartment, and conversion is incurred uniformlythroughout the process.

    Using the following information for the month of March,

    lets prepare a production report for the CuttingDepartment.

    Production Report Example

    P d i R E l

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    70/116

    1-70

    Work in process, March 1: 20,000 units Cost

    Materials: 100% complete. $ 50,000Conversion: 10% complete. 7,200

    Units started into production in March: 30,000 unitsUnits completed and transferred out in March: 40,000 units

    Work in process, March 31: 10,000 unitsMaterials 100% complete.

    Conversion 50% complete.

    Costs incurred during March

    Materials cost 90,000

    Conversion costs:

    Direct labor $ 86,000Applied manufacturing overhead 107,500

    Total conversion costs 193,500

    Total costs to account for $ 340,700

    Production Report Example

    P d ti R t E l

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    71/116

    1-71

    Analysis of Physical Flow of Units

    Physical

    Units

    Work in process, March 1 20,000Units started during March 30,000

    Total units to account for 50,000

    Units completed and transferred out during March 40,000

    Work in process, March 31 10,000Total units accounted for 50,000

    Production Report Example

    P d ti R t E l

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    72/116

    1-72

    Conversion Equivalent Units

    Physical Percentage Direct

    Units Complete Material Conversion

    Work in process, March 1 20,000 10%

    Units started during March 30,000

    Total units to account for 50,000

    Units at the beginning 20,000 90% 18,000

    Units completed during march an 20,000 100% 20,000 20,000Work in process, March 31 10,000 50% 10,000 5,000

    Total units accounted for 50,000

    Total equivalent units 30,000 43,000

    Production Report Example

    Calculation of Equivalent Units

    50% of 10,000 units

    Beginning inventory % is used in First-In First-Out m ethod.

    P d ti R t E l

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    73/116

    1-73

    Conversion Equivalent Units

    Physical Percentage Direct

    Units Complete Material Conversion

    Work in process, March 1 20,000 10%

    Units started during March 30,000

    Total units to account for 50,000

    Units at the beginning 20,000 90% 18,000

    Units started and completed durin 20,000 100% 20,000 20,000Work in process, March 31 10,000 50% 10,000 5,000

    Total units accounted for 50,000

    Total equivalent units 30,000 43,000

    Production Report Example

    Calculation of Equivalent Units

    100% of 10,000 units, allmaterial added at beginning

    P d ti R t E l

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    74/116

    1-74

    Direct

    Material Conversion Total

    Work in Process, March 1 57,200$Costs incurred during March 90,000 193,500 283,500

    Total costs to account for 90,000$ 193,500$ 340,700$

    Equivalent units 30,000 43,000

    Cost per equivalent unit 3.00$ 4.50$ 7.50$

    Computation of unit costs

    Production Report Example

    $90,000 30,000 equivalent units

    $193,500 43,000 equivalent units

    $3.00 + $4.50

    P d ti R t E l

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    75/116

    1-75

    Production Report Example

    Analysis of total costsCost of goods completed and transferred during March

    Work in Process March 1 $57,200

    Cost added during March (18,000 *$4.50) $81,000

    Total Cost 20,000 units @ $6.91 -------------- $138,200Cost of goods completed and transferred during March

    20,000 units @ $7.50 $150,000

    Total $288,200

    Costs remaining in work-in-process on March 31

    Direct Material:

    10,000 equivalent u its @ $3.00 $30,000

    Convserion:

    5,000 equivalent unis @ $4.50 22,500

    P d ti R t E l

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    76/116

    1-76

    Production Report Example

    Analysis of total costsWork in process March 1 $57,200

    Cost added during this month (18,000 @ $4.50) $81,000

    20,000 units @ $6.91 $138,200

    20,000 units x $7.50 per equivalent unit 150,000$

    Costs remaining in work-in-process on March 31Direct Material:

    10,000 equivalent units x $3.00 per equivalent unit 30,000$

    Convserion:

    5,000 equivalent units x $4.50 per equivalent unit 22,500

    Total cost of March 31 work-in-process 52,500

    Total costs accounted for 340,700$

    P d ti R t E l

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    77/116

    1-77

    Production Report Example

    Analysis of total costs

    Cost of goods completed and transferred during March

    Work in process March 1 $57,200

    Cost added during march (18,000 @ $4.50) $81,000

    ________ $138,20020,000 units x $7.50 per equivalent unit 150,400$

    Costs remaining in work-in-process on March 31

    Direct Material:

    10,000 equivalent units x $3.00 per equivalent unit 30,000$

    Convserion:5,000 equivalent units x $4.50per equivalent unit 22,500

    Total cost of March 31 work-in-process 52,500

    Total costs accounted for 340,700$

    All costsaccounted for

    I t i f P ti ll P d M t i l

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    78/116

    Inventories of Partially Processed Materials

    1. For example, if 1,000 units are 50%

    complete at the end of a period, theequivalent units of production would be 500units (1,000*50%).

    2. The computation of equivalent units ofproduction for a period is equal to the sumof the equivalent units of production forcompletion of the beginning work in process

    inventory plus the units started andcompleted during the period plus theequivalent units of production in work inprocess inventory at the end of the period.

    In entories of Partiall Processed Materials

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    79/116

    Inventories of Partially Processed Materials

    Inventory within Polishing department on March 1

    Completed in polishing department and transferred to

    finished goods during March

    Inventory within polishing department on March 31

    600 units1/3

    completed

    9,800 units,

    completed

    800 units,2/5

    completed

    Equivalent Production First In First Out

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    80/116

    Equivalent ProductionFirst-In First-Out

    The equivalent units of production are determined as follows:

    To process units in inventory on March 1 (600 units * 2/3)

    To process units started and completed in March (9,800units

    600 units)To process units in inventory on March 31(800 units * 2/5 )

    Equivalent units of production in March,

    400

    9,200

    320

    9,920

    Equivalent Production First In First Out

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    81/116

    Equivalent ProductionFirst-In First-Out

    The equivalent units of production are determined as follows:

    To process units in inventory on March 1 (600 units * 2/3)

    To process units started and completed in March (9,800units

    600 units)To process units in inventory on March 31(800 units * 2/5 )

    Equivalent units of production in March,

    400

    9,200

    320

    9,920

    Inventories of Partially Processed Materials

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    82/116

    Inventories of Partially Processed Materials

    600 units:

    9, 200 units

    9, 800 units:

    Inventory on March 1, 1/3 completed

    Conversion cost in March:

    600* 2/3, or 400 units at $4.50

    Total (600 @$20.00)

    (unit cost: $ 12,000 + 600 - $ 20)

    Materials cost in March, at $ 16 per unit

    Conversion cost in March:

    9, 200 at $ 4.50 per unit

    Total

    (unit cost: $ 188, 600 / 92, 00 = $ 20.50)

    Goods finished during March:

    $ 10, 200

    1, 800

    $ 147, 200

    41, 400

    $ 12, 000

    188, 600

    $ 200,600

    Goods Finished During March

    Inventories of Partially Processed Materials

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    83/116

    Inventories of Partially Processed Materials

    800 units:

    800 units:

    Materials cost in March, at $ 16 per

    unit

    Conversion cost in March:

    800 * 2/5, or 320 at $ 4.50

    Polishing department inventory on

    March 31

    $

    12,800

    1, 440 $ 14, 240

    Polishing Department Inventory on March 31

    Steps 1 & 2, Illustrated

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    84/116

    p ,(Under FIFO)

    St 3 4 & 5 Ill t t d

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    85/116

    Steps 3, 4 & 5, Illustrated

    Result of the Process (as before)

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    86/116

    Result of the Process (as before)

    Two critical figures arise out of Step Five ofthe cost allocation process:

    1. The amount of the Journal Entry transferringthe allocated cost of units completed and sentfrom Work-in-Process Inventory to FinishedGoods Inventory

    2. The ending balance of the Work-in-Process

    Inventory account that will appear on theBalance Sheet

    Transferred in Costs

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    87/116

    Transferred-in Costs

    Are costs incurred in previous departments that arecarried forward as the products cost when it movesto a subsequent process in the production cycle

    Also called Previous Department Costs

    Journal entries are made to mirror the progress inproduction from department to department

    Transferred-in costs are treated as if they are aseparate type of direct material added at the

    beginning of the process

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    88/116

    Steps 1 & 2, Illustrated

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    89/116

    Steps 3, 4 & 5, Illustrated

    Steps 1 & 2, Illustrated

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    90/116

    S eps & , us a ed(Under FIFO)

    Steps 3 4 & 5 Illustrated

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    91/116

    Steps 3, 4 & 5, Illustrated

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    92/116

    Copyright 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Learning

    Objective6

    Percentage of

    Completion Equivalent Units

    Phys ical with Respect to Direc t

    MVP SPORTS EQUIPMENT COMPANYProduction Report: Cutting Department

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    93/116

    1-93

    Phys ical with Respect to Direc t

    Units Conversion Material Conversion

    Work in process, March 1 20,000 10%

    Units started during March 30,000

    Total units to account for 50,000

    Units completed and transferred 40,000 100% 40,000 40,000

    Work in process, March 31 10,000 50% 10,000 5,000

    Total units accounted for 50,000

    Total equivalent units 50,000 45,000

    Direct

    Material Conversion Total

    Work in Process, March 1 50,000$ 7,200$ 57,200$

    Costs incurred during March 90,000 193,500 283,500Total costs to account for 140,000$ 200,700$ 340,700$

    Equivalent units 50,000 45,000

    Cost per equivalent unit 2.80$ 4.46$ 7.26$

    Cost of goods completed and transferred during March

    40,000 units x $7.26 per equivalent unit 290,400$

    Costs remaining in work-in-process on March 31

    Direct Material:

    10,000 equivalent units x $2.80 per equivalent unit 28,000$

    Conversion:

    5,000 equivalent units x $4.46 per equivalent unit 22,300

    Total cost of March 31 work-in-process 50,300

    Total costs accounted for 340,700$

    A t l C ti N l C ti

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    94/116

    1-94

    Manufacturingoverhead is

    applied

    to Work-in-Process Inventory

    using apredetermined

    overhead rate

    Actual costs of

    manufacturing overheadare entered in Work-in-Process Inventory

    Actual Costing vs. Normal Costing

    Departmental Production Report

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    95/116

    1-95

    Departmental Production Report

    Analysis ofphysical flowof units.

    Calculationof equivalent

    units. Computationof unit costs.

    Analysis oftotal costs.

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    96/116

    Copyright 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Learning

    Objective7

    Operation Costing

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    97/116

    1-97

    Operation Costing

    Operation costing employs some aspectsof both job-order and process costing.

    Job-order Operation Costing Process

    Costing (Products produced in batches) Costing

    Operation Costing

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    98/116

    1-98

    Operation Costing

    Operation costing employs some aspectsof both job-order and process costing.

    Job-order Operation Costing Process

    Costing (Products produced in batches) Costing

    Conversion costsassigned to batches

    as in process costing.

    Material Costs chargedto batches as in

    job-order costing.

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    99/116

    Copyright 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Learning

    Objective8(appendix)

    Sequential Production Departments

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    100/116

    1-100

    Sequential Production Departments

    Direct material Cost of goods Transferred-

    completed and in costs

    Conversion: transferred out

    Direct labor Direct material

    Manufacturingoverhead Conversion:

    Direct labor

    Manufacturing

    overhead

    Work-in-Process Inventory:Cutting Department

    Work-in-Process Inventory:Stitching Department

    Exh.4-4

    Sequential Production Departments

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    101/116

    1-101

    Work in process, March 1: 10,000 units Cost

    Transferred in: 100% complete. $ 61,000

    Materials: none -0-Conversion: 20% complete. 7,600

    Units transferred in during March: 40,000 units

    Units completed and transferred out in March: 30,000 units

    Work in process, March 31: 20,000 units

    Transferred in: 100% complete.Materials: none

    Conversion: 90% complete.

    Costs incurred during March

    Transferred in 290,400

    Materials cost 7,500

    Conversion costs:

    Direct labor $115,000

    Applied manufacturing overhead 115,000

    Total conversion costs 230,000

    Total costs to account for $ 596,500

    q p

    Sequential Production Departments

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    102/116

    1-102

    Analysis of Physical Flow of Units

    Sequential Production Departments

    Physical

    Units

    Work in process, March 1 10,000Units transferred in during March 40,000Total units to account for 50,000

    Units completed and transferred out during March 30,000

    Work in process, March 31 20,000Total units accounted for 50,000

    Sequential Production Departments

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    103/116

    1-103

    Calculation of Equivalent Units

    Sequential Production Departments

    Conversion

    Physical Percentage Transferred Direct

    Units Completion In Material Conversion

    Work in process, March 1 10,000 20%

    Units transferred in during March 40,000

    Total units to account for 50,000

    Units completed and transferred out during March 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000

    Work in process, March 31 20,000 90% 20,000 -0- 18,000

    Total units accounted for 50,000

    Total equivalent units 50,000 30,000 48,000

    90% of 20,000 units

    Production Report Example

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    104/116

    1-104

    Transferred DirectIn Material Conversion Total

    Work in Process, March 1 61,000$ -0- 7,600$ 68,600$Costs incurred during March 290,400 7,500$ 230,000 527,900Total costs to account for 351,400$ 7,500$ 237,600$ 596,500$

    Equivalent units 50,000 30,000 48,000

    Cost per equivalent unit 7.028$ 0.25$ 4.95$ 12.228$

    $351,400 $7,500 $237,600 7.028$

    50,000 30,000 48,000 + $.25

    + $4.95

    Production Report Example

    Computation of unit costs

    Production Report Example

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    105/116

    1-105

    Cost of goods completed and transferred out of Stitching Dept. during March

    30,000 units x $12.228 per equivalent unit 366,840$

    Costs remaining in work-in-process in Stitching Dept. on March 31

    Direct Material:20,000 equivalent units x $7.028 per equivalent unit 140,560$

    Convserion:

    18,000 equivalent units x $4.95 per equivalent unit 89,100

    Total cost of March 31 work-in-process 229,660

    Total costs accounted for 596,500$

    Production Report Example

    Analysis of total costs

    All costsaccounted for

    Standard Costing andP C ti

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    106/116

    Process Costing

    Teams of design and process engineers,operations personnel, and managementaccountants work together to determineseparate standard costs per equivalentunit on the basis of different technicalprocessing specifications for each product

    Standard costs replace actual costs inequivalent unit calculations

    Steps 1 & 2 Illustrated

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    107/116

    Steps 1 & 2, Illustrated

    Steps 3 4 & 5 Illustrated

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    108/116

    Steps 3, 4 & 5, Illustrated

    General Ledger Cost Flows

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    109/116

    General Ledger Cost FlowsIllustrated

    Transferred-in Costs

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    110/116

    Transferred in Costs

    Are costs incurred in previous departments that arecarried forward as the products cost when it movesto a subsequent process in the production cycle

    Also called Previous Department Costs

    Journal entries are made to mirror the progress inproduction from department to department

    Transferred-in costs are treated as if they are aseparate type of direct material added at thebeginning of the process

    St 1 & 2 Ill t t d

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    111/116

    Steps 1 & 2, Illustrated

    Steps 3 4 & 5 Illustrated

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    112/116

    Steps 3, 4 & 5, Illustrated

    Steps 1 & 2 Illustrated

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    113/116

    Steps 1 & 2, Illustrated

    Steps 3, 4 & 5, Illustrated

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    114/116

    Steps 3, 4 & 5, Illustrated

    Hybrid Costing Systems

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    115/116

    yb d Cost g Syste s

    A Hybrid-Costing System blendscharacteristics from both job-costing andprocess-costing systems

    Many actual production systems are in facthybrids

    Examples include manufacturers oftelevisions, dishwashers and washingmachines, as well as Adidas

    End of Chapter 4

  • 7/28/2019 Chap Six (2)

    116/116

    Im ready to processsome leisure time.

    p