chancellor’s budget workshop state economic and fiscal forecast presented by: ron bennett,...
TRANSCRIPT
Chancellor’s Budget Workshop
State Economic and Fiscal Forecast
Presented by:
Ron Bennett, President and CEOJohn Gray, Executive Vice President
© 2012 School Services of California, Inc.
2
Economic Overview
The U.S. economy fell into recession in December 2007, the most severe since the Great Depression
This recession was “declared” over in July 2009, three years ago, and yet many believe that hard times are continuing
While the private sector may be adding jobs, the public sector – including schools – continues to shrink
In order for education to see a turnaround, private sector employment must rebound more strongly, which in turn will generate additional tax revenues to fund various public services
In California, the Legislature and the Governor should be laying the groundwork for future growth
Human capital investment – K-12 education and higher education
Infrastructure investment – roads, bridges, communications
© 2012 School Services of California, Inc.
3
The National Economy
Little has changed since the May RevisionThe economy is growing, but very slowlyLittle progress has been made on employment, with only 80,000 jobs added in JuneThreats from the European Union remain, but a bail-out package for Spain has been crafted
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) for the first quarter of 2012 has been revised downward from 2.2% to 1.9%
For 2010, first quarter growth was 3.9% and for 2011, it was 0.4%Unfortunately, last summer the brakes were applied as Congress fumbled the debate on the debt ceiling, Standard and Poor’s downgraded U.S. debt, and Japan was hit by a tsunami
A fiscal “train wreck” could occur if Congress doesn’t extend the Bush-era tax cuts and reach agreement on scheduled federal spending reductions
© 2012 School Services of California, Inc.
4
The National Economy
Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1-10.0%
-8.0%
-6.0%
-4.0%
-2.0%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
-3.7%
-8.9%
-6.7%
-0.7%
1.7%
3.8% 3.9% 3.8%
2.5%2.3%
0.4% 1.3%1.8%
3.0%
1.9%
U.S. GDP(Percent Change)
2008 20102009 2011 2012
Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, June 2012
© 2012 School Services of California, Inc.
5
Public Section andPrivate Sector Job Growth
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 201190%
95%
100%
105%
110%
115%
120%(Since 1997)
Private Growth Over PeriodPublic Growth Over Period
© 2012 School Services of California, Inc.
6
California’s Economy
The California economy is growing slowly, held down largely by the home foreclosure problem
The real estate market, however, may have turned the corner, with May showing the third consecutive month of rising home prices, breaking the $300,000 barrier for the first time since October 2010
The state’s 10.8% unemployment rate is the third highest in the nation
Source: UCLA Anderson Forecast, June 2012
© 2012 School Services of California, Inc.
7
California’s Economy
Just before recessing, the Legislature approved issuing $4.6 billion in state bonds to begin the high speed rail project estimated to cost $68 billion
$3.3 billion in federal funds were an inducement to move forward
However, a University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) study of Japan’s bullet train concluded that the project did not stimulate the local economy
Japan’s high speed train did lead to urban/suburban sprawl
Claims that California’s high speed rail will lead to 450,000 jobs “are not likely to be realized”
Source: UCLA Anderson Forecast, June 2012
© 2012 School Services of California, Inc.
8
California’s Business Environment
California continues to be ranked the worst state (50th) for business
While California ranked high for living environment, the rankings for workforce quality, taxation, and business regulations dragged it to the bottom
Source: CEO Magazine, June 2012
“California continues to head in the wrong direction as its tax policies will drive more businesses and people to relocate in other states. State politicians feel business and commerce are ‘necessary evils’ that provide the funds to enable pursuit of their misguided agendas.”
CEO Magazine, June 2012
© 2012 School Services of California, Inc.
9
Comparing the Forecasts – Personal Income
2012 2013
0.0%0.5%1.0%1.5%2.0%2.5%3.0%3.5%4.0%4.5%5.0%
4.9%
3.4%3.5%4.0%
Personal Income(Percent Change)
2012-13 Budget ActUCLA, June 2012
© 2012 School Services of California, Inc.
The Value of Education
Education, especially K-12, is critical to the economic success of individuals and our state as a whole
Personal income accounts for more than half of state General Fund revenues
Educational attainment affects earnings
10
No High School
Diploma
High School
Diploma
Associate Degree
Bachelor's Degree
Master's Degree
Doctorate
$20,241 $30,627 $39,771
$56,665 $73,738
$103,054
Av
era
ge
An
nu
al
Ea
rn-
ing
s
Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Survey, 2009
© 2012 School Services of California, Inc.
11
Comparing the Forecasts – Employment
2012 2013
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
1.4%
1.9%
1.6%1.8%
Employment(Percent Change)
2012-13 Budget ActUCLA, June 2012
© 2012 School Services of California, Inc.
12
Comparing the Forecasts – Inflation
2012 20130.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
2.0% 2.0%2.1%
1.6%
Consumer Price Index(Percent Change)
2012-13 Budget ActUCLA, June 2012
© 2012 School Services of California, Inc.
13
General Fund Budget Summary
2011-12 2012-13
(In Millions)
Prior-Year Balance -$2,685 -$2,882
Revenues and Transfers $86,830 $95,887
Total Resources $84,145 $93,005
Total Expenditures $87,027 $91,338
Fund Balance -$2,882 $1,667
Budget Reserve
Reserve for Encumbrances $719 $719
Reserve for Economic Uncertainties -$3,601 $948
Budget Stabilization Account $0 $0
Total Available Reserve -$3,601 $948
The $948 million reserve represents just 1% of revenues and transfers
$95.9 billion in 2012-13 revenues and transfers assumes $8.5 billion in voter-approved taxes
Expenditures are increasing almost 5% even after all of the cuts
Source: 2012-13 Budget Act
© 2012 School Services of California, Inc.
14
Is the Budget Credible?
Budgeted Reserve vs. Final Reserve(In Millions)
Budgeted Reserve at Enactment
Final Reserve One
Year Later Difference
2012-13 $948
2011-12 $543
2010-11 $1,205
2009-10 $500
2008-09 $971
The 2012-13 Budget Act contains a $948 million reserve
Is this credible?
You decide!
-$3,601
-$1,976
-$6,842
-$4,458
???
-$4,144
-$3,181
-$7,342
-$5,429
???
© 2012 School Services of California, Inc.
15
© 2012 School Services of California, Inc.
16
General Fund Revenues
2011-12 2012-13
$92.5
$88.6
$84.6
$78.0
Sta
te R
eve
nu
es(I
n B
illio
ns)
$5.9 billion cutto Proposition 98
if taxes fail
May Revision 2011
$8.5 Billion
New Taxes
Base Revenues
$84.0 Actual 2011-12 Revenues
$4.0 Billion
2011-12 Adopted Budget
The Governor’s Plan
© 2012 School Services of California, Inc.
17
Risks to the State Budget
The Governor’s tax initiative is the biggest risk to the State Budget, with $8.5 billion at stake for the current year
The latest Field Poll puts the initiative at 54% in support and 38% opposed
The Legislature’s approval of the high speed rail project could threaten the tax initiative, with nearly one in three voters polled saying they would be less inclined to support raising taxes if the Legislature funds the project
The already anemic economic recovery could stall, as consumer confidence wanes and spending slows
The sovereign debt crisis in the European Union could drag down U.S. exports
Disruptions in the supply of oil could spike energy prices
© 2012 School Services of California, Inc.
18
Risks to the State Budget
Federal law could trigger a recession unless Congress acts firstBush-era tax cuts are set to expire in January 2013Automatic federal spending cuts could take place, per last year’s Budget agreement
Like prior years, the courts or the federal government could disallow Budget solutions enacted by the Legislature
Medi-Cal reductions have previously been disallowedThe state’s corrections system is under federal receivershipReductions to safety net programs such as State Supplemental Payments (SSP) and child care are vulnerable to court challenge
The state revenue forecasts could be flawedThe Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) has called into question the Department of Finance’s (DOF) assumptions regarding capital gains income
© 2012 School Services of California, Inc.
19
© 2012 School Services of California, Inc.
20
Proposition 98 – The Promise
Proposition 98, enacted by voters in 1988, was intended to:
Provide a source of stable and adequate resources for K-14 public schools
Reduce class sizes to no more than 20:1 in all grades K-12
Establish a minimum base of funding from which resources could grow to match the top ten states in the nation
Simply put, it was the picture of hope, and the promise of a bright future for schools
Painting: Leonardo da Vinci, “Mona Lisa”
© 2012 School Services of California, Inc.
21
Proposition 98 – The Picture Today
Extensive manipulation of Proposition 98 has distorted the initiative’s original vision
Proposition 98 is routinely adjusted, both legislatively and administratively, so that it achieves the K-14 funding targets desired by the Legislature and the Governor
Zero year-over-year change in K-12 funding for 2012-13 is the state’s budgetary goal, if new taxes are approved by voters . . .
. . . even though Proposition 98 is touted to increase by more than 14%Painting: Edvard Munch, “The Scream of Nature”
© 2012 School Services of California, Inc.
22
Proposition 98
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13$0.0
$10.0
$20.0
$30.0
$40.0
$50.0
$60.0
$56.6$49.1 $49.5 $49.7 $46.9
$53.6
Proposition 98 Funding(In Billions)
Test 3 Test 2 Test 1 Test 2(Suspended)
Test 1 Test 1
Initiative Funding$2.9 Billion
“Over Appropriation”$785 Million
(Projected)(Projected)
© 2012 School Services of California, Inc.
23
Majority Vote Budget – Proposition 25
Proposition 25 meant that State Budget spending plans could be passed by a simple majority instead of a two-thirds super majority
Has resulted in two on-time budgetsBut, do on-time budgets mean balanced budgets?
After the Governor vetoed the first enacted Budget last year, the State Controller withheld lawmaker salariesA recent court decision said the State Controller is not empowered to decide the “acceptability” of a Budget enacted by the Legislature – the State Controller has appealed
What’s the future of State Budgets under Proposition 25?On-time Budgets, but also midyear trigger cutsMore manipulation of Proposition 98“Two-Budget” scenarios – the optimistic, passable Budget with midyear cuts triggered if reality doesn’t fit the optimistic picture
© 2012 School Services of California, Inc.
24
Negotiations Process Flow Chart
© 2012 School Services of California, Inc.
25
Negotiations Process Timeline
Thank you for attending!