challenges in cryogenic rocket engine development

36

Click here to load reader

Upload: rhlvrm

Post on 02-Jan-2016

72 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Cryogenic Rocket Engine

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

CHALLENGES IN CRYOGENIC DEVELOPMENT

PRESENT & THE FUTURE

Presentation by

NK GUPTAProject Director, C25

LPSC-ISRO, Trivandrum

Twentieth National ConferenceNew Delhi

April 10-11, 2006

Page 2: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

SATELLITE

C25

L110 (ES)

S200(2 Nos)

GSLV MARK III VEHICLE

Page 3: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Fig 1. STAGE FLOW DIAGRAM

Page 4: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Fig 2. ENGINE OPERATING CYCLES

Expander Cycle Staged combustion Cycle GG Cycle

Page 5: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF VARIOUS CYCLES (Comb. Chamber Pc=60Ksc, MR=6.4, AR=200)

217215-#Incr. P/L from GG Cycle (Kg)

33.4633.3534.87Thrust/weight Ratio

604606587Engine Weight (Kg)

20.21220.21220.468Engine Thrust (T)

5.8725.8725.441Engine Mixture Ratio

459.45459.45453.39Engine lsp. (s)

15512999LH2 Pump Outlet Pr. (Ksc)

Expander Cycle

Staged Combustion

Cycle

Gas Generator Cycle

Page 6: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Fig 1. ENGINE / SUBSYSTEMS

GAS GENERATOR

LOX TURBOPUMP

LH2 TURBOPUMP

INTEGRATED TURBOPUMP

THRUST CHAMBER

FLUID COMPONENTS

INTEGRATED ENGINE (SL)

Page 7: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Fig 3 STAGES OF COPPER CONVERGENT INNER SHELL DEEP DRAWING

2

5

Page 8: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

STAGES OF COPPER DIVERGENT INNER SHELL DEEP DRAWING

1

3

3 4

Page 9: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Combustion chamber helical channel milling

Page 10: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

C20 INJECTOR BODY

Page 11: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

GAS GENERATOR

Page 12: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Fig 6. IGNITORS FOR CRYO ENGINES

1

2

110

17

54

3

4

EBW

EBW

Electric igniterPyrogen igniter

Page 13: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

GG

INJECTION VALVES

LH2

EXHAUST GAS DUCT

LOX

GG WITH FEED CIRCUIT FOR TESTING

Page 14: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

CE20 GAS GENERATOR MOUNTED AT TEST BED

Page 15: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Fig 5. GG HOT TEST SEQUENCE

OPEN Tf+0.2

OPEN Tf+2.5

OPEN Tf+1.5

HELIUM PURGE VALVE

LH2 VENT VALVE (HVV1)

LOX VENT VALVE (OVV1)

LOX VENT VALVE (OVV2)

LH2 INJECTION VALVE(HIV1)

LH2 INJECTION VALVE(HIV2)

IGNITER

LOX INJECTION VALVE(OIV1) LOX INJECTION VALVE(OIV2)

ToOPEN To-20

Tf =To + 50 s

OPEN To

CLOSE To+ 1.5 CLOSE Tf+10

CLOSE To-3

ON To+0.2 To+ 2.7

OPEN To+0.3 CLOSE Tf

CLOSE To-3.3

CLOSE To-6.5

CLOSE To-10

CLOSE Tf + 2.5

OPEN To+ 1.5 CLOSE Tf + 1

OPEN To+ 2.7 CLOSE Tf - 4

CLOSE To-5

Page 16: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Fig 7. PERFORMANCE OF GG IN HOT TEST

3 0

4 0

3 7 .8 +

s)

G G 0 2 H T 0 2 T E S T

Page 17: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

CE20 GAS GENERATOR HOT TEST VIDEO FOOTAGE

Page 18: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Fig 8 CE20 ENGINE- TURBINES ARRANGEMENT

LH2 TURBINELOX TURBINE

TURBINE EXHAUST NOZZLE

Page 19: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Fig 4. DOUBLE LAYERED RING

SINTERED BRONZE SEALRING

Page 20: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

DETAILS OF DOUBLE LAYERED RING

Major specifications :Property External layer Internal layer

• Composition Cu-10%Sn Cu-10%Sn-5%BN• Porosity(%) 30 Max. 20-35• Hardness(BHN) 50 Min. 35 Max• Bending strength 250 min(MPa) 100 min (MPa) • UTS 150 min. (MPa) 50 min (MPa)

Present status of Technology :The technology of processing double layered seal rings of all 3 sizes has been established through powder metallurgy route for application in C-25

Page 21: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Bronze Bronze SealringSealring(YMB(YMB--22)22) OD 53 x ID 44 x 11.3

mm

OD 110 x ID 100 x 12

mm

OD 126 x ID 118 x 9.5

mm

CC--25 Turbo Pump25 Turbo Pump

Page 22: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

CE20 TP DEVELOPMENT TESTS

A. Cold Flow Tests with water/GN2

1. Pump tests, driven by Electric Motor.

2. Turbine test driven by GN2 absorbed by Dynamometer.

3. Integrated Turbo-pump test with GN2 & water.

B. Tests with Cryo Fluids LN2,LOX,LH2

4. Turbine driven by GN2 & Pump working with LN2.

5. Turbine driven by GG & Pump working with LN2.

6. Turbine driven by GG & Pump working with LH2/ LOX

C. Integrated Turbo-pump Tests

7. GG-LH2TP-LOXTP integrated tests.

Page 23: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

LH2 PUMP COLD FLOW TEST

Proto LH2 pump at test bed for testing with water & driven by electric motor

Page 24: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

LH2 TURBINE COLD FLOW TEST

Pi = 8.1 bar, Pout =1 bar,Ti = 284K, Flow =1.1 kg/sPR = 8.1 , U/Co = 0.15

LH2 Turbine tested with GN2 at design pressure ratio and low power level. Cd & efficiency as expected. Speed= 8300 rpm

Power= 80 KWCd value = 0.91-0.93Efficiency= 47% at U/Co=0.15

Page 25: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

LH2 TURBOPUMP

LOX TURBOPUMP

Page 26: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

LOX TP Development tests with LN2

Page 27: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

CE20 LOX TP test with GN2-LN2

Speed: 13000 rpmLN2 Flow: 28 lit/secPump Head: 6 MPa

Page 28: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Fig 9. LOX TURBOPUMP TEST DATA WITH LN2

10000

12000

14000

m

LOX TURBOPUMP TEST

Page 29: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

LH2 TANK

ITSc

LOX TANK

ENGINE

Fig 10

Page 30: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

SPECIFICATIONS OF ENGINE & STAGE

Propellant Combination : LOX/LH2

Total propellant loading : 25790 kg

Operating Cycle : Gas Generator

Thrust, Nominal (Vacuum), kN : 200.7 (±3.0%)

Engine Specific Impulse, s : 443 ± 3

Engine Burn Duration (Nom), s : 550

Chamber Pressure, (Nom), MPa : 6.0

Engine Mixture Ratio : 5.05 (±1.5%)

LOX Flow Rate, kg/s : 38.546

LH2 Flow Rate, kg/s : 7.638

TP speed : 38000 rpm(LH2)

15000 rpm(LOX)

Page 31: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Anti static coatingHeat shield coatingVapour barrier coating

PUF

Adhesive

Tank wall

Fig. 11 CRYO TANK THERMAL INSULATION

Page 32: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Fig 12 Thrust Chamber Test Facility

Page 33: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Thrust Chamber Test Facility

Page 34: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development
Page 35: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development
Page 36: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

CE20 ENGINE SUBSYSTEM TESTS

SINGLE ELEMENT HOT TESTS

GAS GENERATOR DEVELOPMENT TESTS

TURBO-PUMP BEARING TESTS WITH LN2; LOX/LH2

LOX TP SEAL TESTS WITH LN2 & LOX

LH2 TP SEAL TESTS WITH LN2 & LH2

LOX TURBO-PUMP TESTS GN2 & LN2/LOX; GG & LN2 /LOX

LH2 TURBO-PUMP CRYO TESTS GN2/GG & LN2/LH2

INTEGRATED TURBO-PUMP TEST (Pr Fed / Boot Strap)

SUB SCALE CHAMBER (19 ELEMENT) TEST

INTEGRATED SEA-LEVEL ENGINE TEST