challanger launch descision

Upload: apoorv-goyal

Post on 07-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/4/2019 Challanger Launch Descision

    1/12

    Challenger Launch Decision

    By : Group 1

  • 8/4/2019 Challanger Launch Descision

    2/12

    Brief About Case

    Emotional Theories

    Motivational Theories

    Personality TheoriesUnderlying Problems

    Key People Involved

    OUTLINE

  • 8/4/2019 Challanger Launch Descision

    3/12

    Brief About Case

    ChallengerFlight 51-L earlier scheduled to launch inJuly 1985

    After subsequent delays the launch was rescheduledfor 28th January 1986

    Meeting ,scheduled one day prior to the launch i.e

    27th

    Jan.

    To discuss the O-ring erosion problem in the SRM(SolidRocket Motor) joints

  • 8/4/2019 Challanger Launch Descision

    4/12

    KEY PEOPLE INVOLVED

    Larry Mulloy

    (NASA) Joe Kilminster

    Roger Boisjoly

    MSFC solidrocket booster

    manager

    Vice President

    for space

    boostersan engineer

    with Moerton

    Thiokol

    in-charge of O-rings research

  • 8/4/2019 Challanger Launch Descision

    5/12

    Problems involved

    Roger(Morton Thiokol) is apprehensive about thelaunch of the shuttle due to probable O-ringsfailure

    Larry(NASA) is determined to launch the shuttleon the scheduled date as Roger cannot providedconvincing rationale

    Management decision v/s engineering decision

  • 8/4/2019 Challanger Launch Descision

    6/12

    Rogers point of

    view

    O-Ring Temp. must beat-least 53 F. at

    launch time to avoiderosion

    Blow-by occurred at atemp of 53 F. whichcan be proved by theDARK COLOR soot

    b/w the two O-rings

    Decision to be made onexperience base

    Larrys counter-

    view

    No data shows acorrelation between

    low temp and erosion

    No Engineering data tosupport the affect of

    colors on O-Ring

    Engineering decision tobe made on

    quantifiable data

  • 8/4/2019 Challanger Launch Descision

    7/12

    Personality Theories

    ROGER JOE LARRY

    Extraversion

    Agreeable x N/A

    Consientioness

    Emotional Stability N/A N/A

    Openness to

    experiencex N/A

    BIG FIVE THEORY

  • 8/4/2019 Challanger Launch Descision

    8/12

    Myers-Briggs Personality Tests:

    Roger : Intuitive

    Larry : Sensing, Thinking, Judging

    Joe : Intuitive , Feeling

    Machiavellianism:

    Larry :High on Mach

    Self-Monitoring:

    Joe :high on Self-Monitoring

    .. Personality Theories

  • 8/4/2019 Challanger Launch Descision

    9/12

    Roger was a follower of Theory-Y

    Herzbergs Two-factor Theory

    Roger: High motivation factors but low hygiene factors

    Equity Theory

    Roger: Inequity due to less of organizational support

    David McClellands Theory of needs

    Roger : Need for achievement

    Joe : Need for affiliation

    Motivational Theories

  • 8/4/2019 Challanger Launch Descision

    10/12

    Expectancy Theory (Roger Boisjoly)

    INDIVIDUAL EFFORT

    ORGANISATIONAL REWARDS

    PERSONAL GOALS

    ..Motivational Theories

    INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE

    3

    1

    2

  • 8/4/2019 Challanger Launch Descision

    11/12

    Emotional Theories

    Emotional Intelligence

    Self-awareness - Larry

    Self-management - Joe

    Self-motivation - Roger

    Empathy - Joe

    Social skills - Joe

  • 8/4/2019 Challanger Launch Descision

    12/12