ch. 6: markets in action

25
Ch. 6: Markets in Action. Price ceiling and inefficiencies. Price floors (minimum wage) and inefficiency. Taxes and inefficiencies

Upload: wyanet

Post on 23-Feb-2016

24 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Ch. 6: Markets in Action. Price ceiling and inefficiencies. Price floors (minimum wage) and inefficiency. Taxes and inefficiencies. The effect of price ceilings. Price ceiling is a maximum price. “binding” only if ceiling is below equilibrium price. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ch. 6:  Markets in Action

Ch. 6: Markets in Action.

Price ceiling and inefficiencies. Price floors (minimum wage) and inefficiency. Taxes and inefficiencies

Page 2: Ch. 6:  Markets in Action

The effect of price ceilings.

• Price ceiling is a maximum price.– “binding” only if ceiling is below equilibrium price.– binding price ceiling causes a shortage.

Page 3: Ch. 6:  Markets in Action

SR & LR effects without price ceiling

S

D

$4

Suppose equilibrium price of gasoline is $4 and a hurricane destroys numerous refineries. Examine SR & LR effects on price and quantity.

Page 4: Ch. 6:  Markets in Action

Compare outcomes with and without a price ceiling at $4• Shortage• Effect on consumer’s surplus• Effect on producer’s surplus • Deadweight loss• Black markets, search costs, enforcement costs

S

D

$4 S-LR

Millions of gallons per day

Page 5: Ch. 6:  Markets in Action

The effect of price floors

• A price floor is a minimum price– binding only if it is set above the equilibrium

price– binding price floor creates a surplus.

Page 6: Ch. 6:  Markets in Action

Minimum Wage

• Is a price floor on labor.• Why is there a minimum wage? • Would a higher minimum wage make

workers better off?• Efficiency versus equity

Page 7: Ch. 6:  Markets in Action

The Labor Market and the Minimum Wage

Minimum wage isa price floor.

Price floor is “binding” only if it is above equilibrium price.

Page 8: Ch. 6:  Markets in Action

The Labor Market and the Minimum Wage

A “binding” price floor • reduces consumer (employer) surplus

•Could increase or decrease producer (employee) surplus

•Creates a deadweight loss• Destroys some of the producer surplus (employee) through search activity.

Page 9: Ch. 6:  Markets in Action

The Effect of Price Floors

In general, a “binding” price floor will result in:a. Buyers (employers) are worse offb. Sellers (employees) could be better or worse off. c. A deadweight loss.

S

D

1000

$2

500

$1

$3 ab

cd

ef

1500

Page 10: Ch. 6:  Markets in Action

Taxes• Tax Incidence

– the division of the burden of a tax between the buyer and the seller.

– When an item is taxed, its price might rise by the full amount of the tax, by a lesser amount, or not at all.

– If the price rises by the full amount of the tax, the buyer pays the tax.

– If the price rises by a lesser amount than the tax, the buyer and seller share the burden of the tax.

– If the price doesn’t rise at all, the seller pays the tax.

Page 11: Ch. 6:  Markets in Action

Taxes

• Tax Incidence– Tax incidence doesn’t depend on tax law.– The law might impose a tax on the buyer or

the seller, but the outcome will be the same.– Example: On July 1, 2002, Mayor Bloomberg

upped the cigarette tax in New York City from almost nothing to $1.50 a pack.

Page 12: Ch. 6:  Markets in Action

Tax Incidence

.

Page 13: Ch. 6:  Markets in Action

Taxes

• Tax incidence:– Buyer: $1– Seller : $.50

Page 14: Ch. 6:  Markets in Action

Taxes

• A Tax on Buyers– suppose that

buyers, not sellers, are taxed $1.50 a pack.

• Tax incidence:– Buyer: $1– Seller: $.50

Page 15: Ch. 6:  Markets in Action

Tax Division and Elasticity of Demand

The more inelastic the demand, the larger is the buyers’ share of the tax.

Page 16: Ch. 6:  Markets in Action

Taxes

The more elastic the supply, the larger is the buyers’ share of the tax.

Page 17: Ch. 6:  Markets in Action

Taxes

• Taxes in Practice– Taxes usually are levied on goods and

services with an inelastic demand or an inelastic supply.

– Alcohol, tobacco, and gasoline have inelastic demand, so the buyers of these items pay most the tax on them.

– Labor has a low elasticity of supply, so the seller—the worker—pays most of the income tax and most of the Social Security tax.

Page 18: Ch. 6:  Markets in Action

TaxesTaxes create allocative

inefficiency unless S or D is perfectly inelastic.

• What’s effect of tax on1. Consumer surplus2. Producer surplus3. Tax revenue4. Deadweight loss

• Excess burden of tax reduction in consumer &

producer surplus minus tax revenue

Identical to deadweight loss

Page 19: Ch. 6:  Markets in Action

Subsidies and Quotas

– Fluctuations in the weather bring big fluctuations in farm output.

– How do changes in farm output affect the prices of farm products and farm revenues?

– How might farmers be helped by intervention in markets for farm products?

Page 20: Ch. 6:  Markets in Action

Stabilizing Farm Revenues

– A poor harvest decreases supply.

Effect on total revenue?• higher price• lower quantity

How would answer change if demand were elastic?

Page 21: Ch. 6:  Markets in Action

Stabilizing Farm Revenues

– A large harvest increases supply.

– Effect on total revenue?• Lower price• Higher quantity

– How would answer change if demand were elastic?

Page 22: Ch. 6:  Markets in Action

Stabilizing Farm Revenues

Intervention in markets for farm products takes two main forms:

Subsidiesa payment made by the government to a producer

that’s in addition to market price received. Production quotas

an upper limit on the quantity of a good that may be produced during a specified period.

Page 23: Ch. 6:  Markets in Action

Subsidies

Effect of $20 subsidy• Equilibrium quantity• Equilibrium price • Consumer surplus• Producer surplus• Cost to taxpayers• Deadweight loss

Page 24: Ch. 6:  Markets in Action

The $20 subsidy would cause consumers to be a) $500 million better offb) $600 million better offc) $400 million better offd) $400 million worse

off

10

Page 25: Ch. 6:  Markets in Action

Quotas• Maximum production

allowed.• Binding only if below equil

quantity• limits total production to 40

million tons a year.• Effect on

– Price– Consumer’s surplus– Producer’s surplus– Deadweight loss– Price of license