ch 11 powder metallurgy kc part 2(1)

Upload: drew-peng

Post on 02-Jun-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)

    1/21

    Project 1

    Average 82%

    Range 52-95

    Top Teams

    95% Team 1 The Industrious Mechys

    95% Team 11 Tainted Monkey

    93% Team 21 Future of Engineering 91% Team 15 Captain Crunch and the Cereal Killers

    91% Team 4 Mountaineers

    90% Team 10 The Mountaineers

    1

  • 8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)

    2/21

    CHAPTER-11

    POWDER PROCESSING

    2

    POWDER PROCESSING

  • 8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)

    3/21

    Advantages:

    Produces a high yield compared to other primaryprocessing methods - usually over 95 percent.

    Complex and thin shapes can be producedrelatively easily.

    Few machining operations are required, because

    the part already has a good finish.

    High production levels and good reproducibility.

    3

  • 8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)

    4/21

    Process Limitations

    Tooling costs are high - because high pressures are

    involved and product shapes are intricate.

    Material cost are high - because the powder form is

    more costly than bars, sheets, etc. Mechanical properties (such as strength) are lower if

    the part is not 100 percent dense.

    Solid state shrinkage will occur during sintering andcooling.

    4

  • 8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)

    5/21

    Design Limitations

    Small, intricate shapes produced - maximum weight of 70 lbs.

    Uniform sections preferred - grooves, tapers, and threads aregenerally not possible (since powder cannot be compacted to

    uniform density).

    Minimum section thickness is 0.06 in (1.5mm).

    Length/diameter ratio should be under 5 for cylinders.

    Thin shapes, two dimensional best (gears, knife blades, etc.)

    5

  • 8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)

    6/21

    Design Considerations

    The total volume of the partVT = Va +Vb + Vc+ void space.

    WhereVT = Total volume of part.Va = Volume of part from material A.Vb = Volume of part from material B.

    Vc = Volume of part from material C.void space = volume of part not filled.

    The total weight of the partMT = Ma + Mb + Mc.

    Where

    MT=Total weight of part.Ma=Weight of part due to material A.Mb= Weight of part due to material B.Mc= Weight of part due to material C.

    6

  • 8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)

    7/21

    Volume of the partVx = Mx / dx

    Where:Vx = volume of material X in final component

    Mx = Mass of material Xdx = density of material X

    But Mass of Material X isMx = WFx*MWFx = weight fraction of material XM = Total mass of part M

    7

  • 8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)

    8/21

    The Total Material cost would be the sum of

    the individual mass components times their

    respective unit costs.

    CU=(Ca*Ma)+(Cb*Mb)+(Cc*Mc).

    The strength of the component can be

    estimated by means of the volume fraction.

    8

  • 8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)

    9/21

    9

  • 8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)

    10/21

    10

    Example -1

    10

  • 8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)

    11/21

    1111

  • 8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)

    12/21

    12 12

  • 8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)

    13/21

    13 13

  • 8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)

    14/21

    14 14

  • 8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)

    15/21

    15 15

  • 8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)

    16/21

    16 16

  • 8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)

    17/21

    17

    Example -2

    17

  • 8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)

    18/21

    18 18

  • 8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)

    19/21

    19 19

  • 8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)

    20/21

    Summary

    Virtually unlimited choice of alloys, composites, and associated

    properties.

    Refractory materials are popular by this process.

    Controlled porosity for self lubrication or filtration uses.

    Can be very economical at large run sizes (100,000 parts).

    Long term reliability through close control of dimensions and

    physical properties.

    Very good material utilization.

    Limited part size and complexity

    High cost of powder material.

    High cost of tooling.

    Less strong parts than wrought ones.

    Less well known process.

    20

  • 8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)

    21/21

    Homework

    HW 8 Due Tuesday, September 30

    Problem 1. Work problem 11-7 with the finalvolume of the part = 8 in3and will be 85% dense. Allother data remains the same. Problem 11-7 issimilar to Example problem 11.1.

    Problem 2. The density of a part is increased to 98%from 72% and the original part shape was 6.0 in x 3.0

    in x 2.0 in. What are the final part dimensions? Thisproblem similar to Example problem 11.2.

    21