ch 11 powder metallurgy kc part 2(1)
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)
1/21
Project 1
Average 82%
Range 52-95
Top Teams
95% Team 1 The Industrious Mechys
95% Team 11 Tainted Monkey
93% Team 21 Future of Engineering 91% Team 15 Captain Crunch and the Cereal Killers
91% Team 4 Mountaineers
90% Team 10 The Mountaineers
1
-
8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)
2/21
CHAPTER-11
POWDER PROCESSING
2
POWDER PROCESSING
-
8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)
3/21
Advantages:
Produces a high yield compared to other primaryprocessing methods - usually over 95 percent.
Complex and thin shapes can be producedrelatively easily.
Few machining operations are required, because
the part already has a good finish.
High production levels and good reproducibility.
3
-
8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)
4/21
Process Limitations
Tooling costs are high - because high pressures are
involved and product shapes are intricate.
Material cost are high - because the powder form is
more costly than bars, sheets, etc. Mechanical properties (such as strength) are lower if
the part is not 100 percent dense.
Solid state shrinkage will occur during sintering andcooling.
4
-
8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)
5/21
Design Limitations
Small, intricate shapes produced - maximum weight of 70 lbs.
Uniform sections preferred - grooves, tapers, and threads aregenerally not possible (since powder cannot be compacted to
uniform density).
Minimum section thickness is 0.06 in (1.5mm).
Length/diameter ratio should be under 5 for cylinders.
Thin shapes, two dimensional best (gears, knife blades, etc.)
5
-
8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)
6/21
Design Considerations
The total volume of the partVT = Va +Vb + Vc+ void space.
WhereVT = Total volume of part.Va = Volume of part from material A.Vb = Volume of part from material B.
Vc = Volume of part from material C.void space = volume of part not filled.
The total weight of the partMT = Ma + Mb + Mc.
Where
MT=Total weight of part.Ma=Weight of part due to material A.Mb= Weight of part due to material B.Mc= Weight of part due to material C.
6
-
8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)
7/21
Volume of the partVx = Mx / dx
Where:Vx = volume of material X in final component
Mx = Mass of material Xdx = density of material X
But Mass of Material X isMx = WFx*MWFx = weight fraction of material XM = Total mass of part M
7
-
8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)
8/21
The Total Material cost would be the sum of
the individual mass components times their
respective unit costs.
CU=(Ca*Ma)+(Cb*Mb)+(Cc*Mc).
The strength of the component can be
estimated by means of the volume fraction.
8
-
8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)
9/21
9
-
8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)
10/21
10
Example -1
10
-
8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)
11/21
1111
-
8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)
12/21
12 12
-
8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)
13/21
13 13
-
8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)
14/21
14 14
-
8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)
15/21
15 15
-
8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)
16/21
16 16
-
8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)
17/21
17
Example -2
17
-
8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)
18/21
18 18
-
8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)
19/21
19 19
-
8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)
20/21
Summary
Virtually unlimited choice of alloys, composites, and associated
properties.
Refractory materials are popular by this process.
Controlled porosity for self lubrication or filtration uses.
Can be very economical at large run sizes (100,000 parts).
Long term reliability through close control of dimensions and
physical properties.
Very good material utilization.
Limited part size and complexity
High cost of powder material.
High cost of tooling.
Less strong parts than wrought ones.
Less well known process.
20
-
8/10/2019 Ch 11 Powder Metallurgy KC Part 2(1)
21/21
Homework
HW 8 Due Tuesday, September 30
Problem 1. Work problem 11-7 with the finalvolume of the part = 8 in3and will be 85% dense. Allother data remains the same. Problem 11-7 issimilar to Example problem 11.1.
Problem 2. The density of a part is increased to 98%from 72% and the original part shape was 6.0 in x 3.0
in x 2.0 in. What are the final part dimensions? Thisproblem similar to Example problem 11.2.
21