cetirizine effectively relieves both ocular allergy symptoms and nasal allergy symptoms in subjects...
TRANSCRIPT
J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL
VOLUME 133, NUMBER 2
Abstracts AB279
ESDAY
962 Cetirizine Significantly Relieves Ocular Allergy Symptoms InSubjects With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
Dr. Mitesh Patel, PharmD1, Dr. Eduardo Urdaneta, MD1, Ms. Kathleen
B. Franklin, BSN, RN2, Ms. Xiaoyan Tian, MS3, Dr. Mei-Miau Wu, Dr
PH4, Ms. Qiong Du, MS3; 1McNeil Consumer Healthcare, Fort Washing-
ton, PA, 2Franklin Consultants, LLC., Phoenixville, PA, 3Johnson & John-
son Consumer Products, China, Shanghai, China, 4J & J Consumer
Products, US, Morris Plains, NJ.
RATIONALE: Evaluate the efficacy of cetirizine for ocular allergy
symptom relief in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR).
METHODS: Seven randomized placebo-controlled SAR studies of
cetirizine 5, 10, or 20 mg daily were evaluated post hoc. Total ocular
symptom score (TOSS) was evaluated in each study. TOSS was sum of the
severity scores for itchy eyes and watery eyes in all studies; one study also
included red eyes. Individual symptom scores were rated on a 4-point scale
(05none to 35severe). Subjects with baseline itchy eye scores >_1 were
included in the analysis. Changes from baseline in TOSS over a 2-week
treatment period, by day in the first week, and weekly were assessed.
RESULTS: Over a 2-week treatment period, mean changes from baseline
in TOSS for the cetirizine groups (N51255) ranged from -2.11 to -2.65 for
5mg, -1.26 to -2.63 for 10mg, and -2.97 for 20mg, representing
improvement relative to baseline of 50% to 67.4% for 5mg, 35.1% to
62.2% for 10mg, and 61.2% for 20mg. Compared with placebo (N5878),
TOSS improvements were statistically superior in 5 studies. In these
studies, treatment effect size ranged from 0.52 to 0.62 for 5mg, 0.40 to 0.58
for 10mg, and 0.78 for 20mg. First week by-day analysis showed significant
improvements in TOSS for cetirizine subjects comparedwith placebo in the
majority of studies.Weekly TOSS inweeks 1 and 2 for the cetirizine groups
were significantly reduced compared with placebo in 5 studies.
CONCLUSIONS: Cetirizine 10mg once daily effectively relieves ocular
allergy symptoms in subjects with SAR.
963 Cetirizine Effectively Relieves Both Ocular Allergy Symptomsand Nasal Allergy Symptoms In Subjects With SeasonalAllergic Rhinitis
Dr. Eduardo Urdaneta, MD1, Ms. Xiaoyan Tian, MS2, Dr. Mei-Miau
Wu, Dr PH3, Ms. Qiong Du, MS2, Ms. Kathleen B. Franklin, BSN,
RN4, Dr. Mitesh Patel, PharmD1; 1McNeil Consumer Healthcare, Fort
Washington, PA, 2Johnson & Johnson Consumer Products, China,
Shanghai, China, 3J & J Consumer Products, US, Morris Plains, NJ,4Franklin Consultants, LLC., Phoenixville, PA.
RATIONALE: Evaluate efficacy of cetirizine 10mg daily for ocular and
nasal allergy symptom relief in subjectswith seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR).
METHODS: Six randomized placebo-controlled SAR studies of cetir-
izine 10mg daily were evaluated post hoc. Total ocular symptom score
(TOSS) and total nasal symptom score (TNSS) changes were assessed for
each study. TOSSwas sum of severity scores for itchy eyes andwatery eyes
in all studies; one study also included red eyes. TNSS was sum of severity
scores for sneezing, runny nose, itchy nose in all studies; two studies also
included post-nasal discharge. Individual symptom scores were rated on 4-
point scale (05none to 35severe). Subjects with baseline itchy eye score>_1 were assessed for TOSS and subjects with baseline itchy nose score >_1
for TNSS. Changes from baseline in TOSS and TNSS over a 2-week
treatment period, by day in first week, and weekly were assessed.
RESULTS: Over 2 weeks, mean changes from baseline in cetirizine 10mg
groups (TOSS, N51255; TNSS, N5921) ranged from -1.26 to -2.63 in
TOSS and from -2.22 to -4.02 in TNSS, representing improvement from
baseline of 35.1% to 62.2% for TOSS and 29.3% to 62.7% for TNSS.
Compared with placebo (TOSS, N5878; TNSS, N5834), TOSS improve-
ments were statistically superior in 4 studies and for TNSS in 5 studies. In
these studies, treatment effect size ranged from 0.40 to 0.58 for ocular
symptoms and from 0.43 to 0.83 for nasal symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: Cetirizine 10mg daily effectively relieved both ocular
allergy symptoms and nasal allergy symptoms in subjects with SAR.
964 Automated Evaluation Of Conjunctival Provocation TestsMr. Torsten Sehlinger1, Mr. Jaron Zuberbier2, Dr. Oliver
Kuehlert1, Mr. Frank Goergen1, Prof. Torsten Zuberbier3,
Prof. Karl-Christian Bergmann3; 1Bluestone Technology GmbH, Woerr-
stadt, Germany, 2Evangelic High-School Kleinmachnow, Germany,3Allergy-Centre-Charit�e, Berlin, Germany.
RATIONALE: Conjunctival provocation testing is used in clinical trials,
allowing for normalization of conjunctival allergen reactions. The
evaluation of the conjunctival reaction, meaning the categorization of the
reaction’s severance due to the provocation is done manually. Even when
executed by trained personal, this approach allows for variations in the
categorization due to individual misinterpretation. These errors are adding
up in multi-central studies, where several individuals are evaluating
subjects and protocol assumes equal evaluation quality. Currently the
only possible, but cost intensive option is to reduce the error by having each
subject evaluated multiple times by different personal.
METHODS: An automated system able to evaluate conjunctival reactions
in a standardized, reproducible and cost-effective manner should allow for
better and comparable results, even cross-study comparability. Therefore,
an eye monitoring device was developed, able to scan both eyes under
controlled conditions, including lightning, distance and eye movement.
The associated analyzing Software is able to categorize the conjunctival
reaction based on the vascular dilatation of dedicated blood vessels as well
as the change in the general conjunctival redness.
RESULTS: The system developed showed a compatible accuracy in the
evaluation compared to the average results of three trained evaluatingmedical
professionals. No medical professional was needed to perform high quality
results. Since scans are stored, a quality assurance process can be put in place.
CONCLUSIONS: Automated evaluations of conjunctival provocation
tests can help to increase accuracy, comparability and reproducibility,
while simultaneously lowering the overall costs. This would allow for a
more frequent and broader usage of conjunctival provocation testing.
965 Aeroallergen Immunotherapy Reduces Wheal Diameter InSeasonal and Perennial Allergen Intradermal Skin Tests
Mr. Michael Hauk1, Mrs. Barbara A. McGoey, RN1, Mr. Parimal Patel1,
Mrs. Nicole Argenzia, RN1, Dr. Mary Ann Michelis, MD, FAAAAI21Hack-
ensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ.2Center for Allergy,
Asthmaand ImmuneDisordersHackensackUniversityMedicalCenter,Hack-
ensack, NJ.
RATIONALE: Aeroallergen Immunotherapy (IT) is used to relieve
persistent symptoms of allergic rhinitis, asthma, and allergic conjunctivitis.
This study determines efficacy of IT in desensitizing patients to certain
allergens. We hypothesize IT treatment would show decreases in wheal
diameter in seasonal and perennial allergen intradermal skin tests (SKT).
METHODS: 29 year retrospective chart review on 180 patients ages 18-
91years, who had >_2 SKT. 120 patients received IT of northeastern pollens,
dust mites, and animal danders; 60 patients, as our control, had no IT. IT
treatments varied between 1-9 allergens, most receiving >_3. Initial SKTwas
compared to current SKT (average 7 years between) to see average changes
in wheal diameter for grass, tree, English plantain, ragweed, dust mites, cat
hair, and dog epithelia. P values were based on the Student’s t test.
RESULTS: 120 IT patients (83 female), average age 52 years (SD515.4),
had allergic rhinitis. 64 asthma, 53 conjunctivitis, 20 atopic dermatitis, and
18 chronic sinusitis. 60 control patients (49 female), average age 56 years
(SD516.4), had allergic rhinitis. 34 asthma, 16 conjunctivitis, 7 atopic
dermatitis, and 9 chronic sinusitis. In IT patients, grass allergen had the
largest average decrease in wheal diameter by 4.2mm, dog had the least
with a decrease by 0.9mm. The control group had an increase in wheal
diameter, such as the grass allergen with an average increase of 2.4mm. All
allergens except cat and dust mites had significant P values (<0.05).CONCLUSIONS: Aeroallergen immunotherapy was effective in reducing
wheal diameter across all allergens with various degrees of efficacy.
TU