centrifuge physical modeling & scaling laws.pdf
TRANSCRIPT
Centrifuge Physical Modeling &
Scaling Laws
Tarek Abdoun
RPI/UCD NEES Centrifuge Research and Training
Workshop 2011
Geotechnical Centrifuge
Ng
Ground Centrifuge Modeling
Concept
Radial g-field
• At which radius do you calculate g = w2r?
• Pick a point in the model where you are most concerned about accurately modeling the effective stress. Set g accordingly.
– For level ground: s = r (gavg overburden)(d)
• Document the RPM and the radius to a reference point on the model container
• Might need to account for g variation in deep models
Why Physical Model Tests?
• Complex, nonlinear stress-strain behavior
of soil (made of interacting particles, air,
water)
• Difficulty of numerical simulation of soil
and soil-structure systems at large strains
and failure
• Validate and calibrate numerical methods
Why Centrifuge Model Tests?
• Small-scale models are cost-effective
• Soil properties are highly stress-dependent
• Centrifuge produces equal confining stresses
in model and prototype, therefore same soil
properties
• Then, reasonable assumption that strains and
deformations are also equal in model and
prototype
Application Domain: Systems
• Natural or artificial soil deposits, different
soil types, different geometries, earth
dams and dykes
• Soil-foundation and soil-structure systems:
– foundations of buildings, bridges
– buried pipes and tunnels, basements
– earth levees with sheetpiles
– etc.
Application Domain : Loadings
• Static gravity loads
• Earthquake shaking
• Blasting
• Ground deformation
• Water waves
• Contaminant transport
Centrifuge Modeling Limitations
• Useful only for systems containing
soil or other pressure-dependent
material
• Models allow limited detail
• Effect of model boundaries
• Time scale and strain-rate issues
Scaling Laws (N = number of g’s)
• Stress & Pressure σ * = 1
• Density ρ * = 1
• Length 1/N
• Velocity 1
• Acceleration N
• Volume 1/N3
• Mass 1/N3
• Force 1/N2
• Time (dynamic) 1/N
• Time (diffusion) 1/N2
Scaling Laws
Catalogue of scaling laws and
similitude questions in
centrifuge modelling
• Technical Committee TC2 –Physical
Modelling in Geotechnics 2007
• Covers: dynamics, fluid flow in soils, heat
transfer and ice, particle size effects, rate
effects
• About 60 references
Concerns regarding scale
effects and scaling laws
• Unsaturated soil, Turbulent flow,
Erosion, Shear bands
• Effect of transducer or model container
on the experiment
• Range of scaling laws applicability (50g,
100g, 150g, etc.)
Modeling Structural Elements
• Very challenging task:
– D & t (N)
– Area (N2)
– Inertia (N4)
– E (1) for same material
• Usually very difficult to maintain the same scale
for all parameters or to use same material in
both model and prototype (easier if no specific
prototype)
• Need to prioritize (EA, EI, t/D, etc.)
– EI for flexure or bending
– EA for axial loading
NEES-Pipelines “Evaluation of Ground Rupture Effects on Critical Lifelines”
Numerical
Modeling
Centrifuge
Modeling Full scale
Testing
EA vs. EI for Structural Elements
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12
tm/D
m
tp/Dp
EA curve
EI curve
Em/Ep= 0.6
EA vs. EI for Structural Elements
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12
tm/D
m
tp/Dp
EA curve
EI curve
Em/Ep= 0.6
EA vs. EI for Structural Elements
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12
tm/D
m
tp/Dp
EA curve
EI curve
Em/Ep= 0.6
tm/Dm = 2 tp/Dp
Other Factors: Strain Rate
0 1 2 3 4
Axial Strain (%)
0
5
10
15
20
25
Axia
l S
tres
s (
MP
a)
HDPE Material Stress-Strain Behavior
0.1%/min
1%/min10%/min
1%/min
0.16%/min
130%/min
300%/min
Hypobolic Fit (Merry & Bray, 1997)
RPI Uniaxial Tension Test
100%/min
300%/min
Comparison with Full Scale Test
Results (-63.5o Tension Test)
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
Distance from Fault (m)
0
2
4
6
8
10S
pri
ng
lin
e S
train
(%
)Full Scale, f = 1.06 m
Full Scale, f = 0.49 m
Centrifuge, f = 1.06 m
Centrifuge, f = 0.49 m
Springline Strain Comparison
-63.5o Strike-Slip (Tension)
Time Scaling Conflict
• Dynamic Time L = 0.5 a t2 L* = a* t*2 t* = sqrt(L*/a*)
t*dyn = sqrt(L*/(1/L*)) = L* or 1/N
• Diffusion Time, consider time factor, T For similarity, T* = 1 = cv* t* /L*2
t*dif = L*2 / cv*
If cv* = 1 (same soil in model and prototype) then:
t*dif = L*2 or 1/N2
• Conflict t*dif ≠ t*dyn
• Conflict Resolution – By increasing viscosity of the fluid (m* = 1/L* or N)
– Decreasing the particle size of the soil (k* = C (D10*)2 )
Time Scaling Conflict
• Sometimes, conflict can be neglected without
changing cv
– both model and prototype are undrained during dynamic
event
– both model and prototype are drained during dynamic event
• we may want to systematically vary viscosity to cover
an interesting range. (Reviewers may have difficulty
with this concept)
• It takes time to saturate a large model with viscous
pore fluid. For practical purposes, we may knowingly
violate time scale factor similarity, and then account
for the different cv by analysis
Modeling of Shear Bands
J. DeJong, U. Mass Amherst web page
The shear band thickness
depends on particle size, not
on L* (N)
Modeling of Shear Bands
Particle Size Reduction
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Particle size, mm
% S
oil p
ass
ing
Scaled SandOttawa Sand F#55
Centrifuge
Modeling
Full Scale Testing
Particle Size effect
• Most basic requirement is that there are a sufficient number of particles across the dimensions of a model so that we can model the soil as a continuum. – Required Dmodel/Dparticle depends on the problem.
– Footings: Dfooting/Dparticle > 30 (minimizes particle size effect)
• To model contact stress and capillary rise most accurately, need to use same particle size (pore size) and fluid. The Ability to model capillary rise is an advantage of centrifuge high g modeling.
Explosions are Volumetric
• Explosions Scale as N3
• 1 gram of explosive tested at
100g is equivalent to one million
(106) grams of prototype
explosive, or one metric ton
(2200 lb)
• Scale effects also include
particle size effects and
differences in radial acceleration
Application of High Speed
Camera to Blasting Tests
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E-04 1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06
Scaled Charge Mass (kg)
Scale
d D
ep
th (
m)
S&H su-ho bu-ve su-ve Pow er (S&H)
Blast Modeling
• Time Scales as g2 – E.G., 24 Hour test @ 105g = 30 years prototype time
• Advection (Hydraulic flow) – No theoretical
problems
• Dispersivity (Diffusion, Dispersion) – more
complicated, but can be done
Groundwater/Contaminant
Transport
• General: Single contaminant, conservative
contaminant – models acceptable
• The robot gives us a unique opportunity to
determine the transport and concentration with
time of multiple contaminants
Groundwater/Contaminant
Transport (cont.)
Boundary/Container effects
• Flexible Containers
– Hinged plate, Laminar boxes
• Ideal for gently sloping
or level ground
– Complementary Shear issue
Boundary/Container effects
• Rigid containers
– P-waves from
ends of the container
• Side friction
– Avoid narrow containers (width < height)
– Reduce sides friction
– Move structures e.g., away from boundaries
• Lateral stiffness (maintaining Ko)
Ground motion selection
Sine waves, step waves or realistic
ground motions?
• Small step waves – Useful to check that sensors are working
• Sine waves are easier to understand than real ground motions – Because they only reveal information about part of
the problem (one frequency from the possible spectrum)
• Sine sweeps – Useful because they cover all frequencies, but
amplitude is not random.
• Ground motion provides more realistic conditions but could be difficult to analyze
Final Thoughts • Centrifuge Modeling is a tool that makes model tests more
accurate because it reproduces prototype stress levels in a small scale model but be mindful of it’s limitations
• Centrifuge Modeling is useful to:
– Test the validity of a numerical model
– Perform systematic parameter studies
– Discover mechanisms of behavior
• Model testing is valuable for problems where field data is insufficient – can obtain data that is impossible to obtain in other ways.
• Advanced instruments of NEES (robotics, shakers, instrumentation) enable more accurate and more detailed models than was possible in the past.
NEES centrifuge research
• Complementary NEES Centrifuges
– UCD: larger container, V&H shaker, more sensors per test, multiple tests per container
– RPI: medium size, H&H shaker, more tests per month, Robot, split box.
Thank You