central council of indian medicine new delhi agenda item no.1 confirmation of the minutes of 37th...

138y

CENTRAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN MEDICINENEW DELHI

MINUTES OF 38TH MEETING OF AYURVEDA COMMITTEEHELD ON 23.2.2008 AT NEW DELHI.

1. Vaidya Raghunandan Sharma, President, CCIM Ex-officio2. Dr. Jayprakash Narayan Chairman3. Prof. Kulwant Singh, Chairman, Ed.Comm.(Ay.) Ex-officio4. Dr. BK Jay Singh Member5. Dr. Sivanandam Member6. Dr. PK Jain Member7. Dr. Ved Prakash Tyagi Member8. Dr. Niranjan Singh Tyagi Member9. Dr. Marri Vaman Readdy Member10. Dr. Gajendra Bharali Member11. Dr. Deovrat Narayan Singh Member12. Dr. Alakh Narayan Singh Member13. Dr. Om Prakash Vashisth Member14. Dr. KC Sharma Member15. Dr. Bimla Chaudhary Member16. Dr. KC Ballal Member17. Dr. D Ramanathan Member18. Dr. RS Parihar Member19. Dr. Rajesh Shukla Member20. Dr. GK Ahuja Member21. Dr. KV Shah Member22. Dr. RK Deshmukh Member23. Dr. NV Salgarkar Member24. Vaidya Jagjeet Singh Member25. Dr. Mukesh Walia Member26. Dr. Hari Ram Bhadoria Member27. Dr. Kamlesh Verma Member28. Dr. SC Gupta Member29. Dr. VV Chhikara Member30. Dr. Amitabh Kumar Member31. Dr. Manoj Kumar Dubey Member32. Dr. AV Joshi Member33. Dr. S Madhavan Member34. Dr. BL Gaur Member35. Dr. SS Savirkar Member36. Dr. KG Chandrappa Member

238y

37. Dr. M Mohan Alva Member38. Dr. MM Jumle Member39. Dr. Yuvraj Kumar Tyagi Member40. Dr. MRV Nampoothiri Member

Dr. PR Sharma Secretary, CCIM

Following could not attend the meeting:-

1. Dr. IM Jha Member2. Dr. Sukhdevsingh Vansia Member3. Dr. K Anil Kumar Member4. Dr. Mahendra Kumar Sharma Member5. Dr. P Narayanan Member6. Dr. AV Dwivedi Member7. Dr. (Mrs.) Pooja Bhardwaj Member8. Dr. SK Bhunia Member9. Dr. Batuk Shankar Joshi Member10. Dr. Sheshadri Member11. Dr. P Ram Manohar Member12. Dr. Ashok Kumar Sharma Member13. Dr. Roop Lal Sharma Member14. Dr. SD Garg Member

Special Agenda Item No.1 Condolence Resolution on the saddemise of Vaidya ShriramSharma, Ex-President, CCIM,Vaidya Gauri Lal Chanana Ex-Chairman, Finance Committee.

It was noted that Vaidya Shriram Sharma, Ex-President, CCIM and VaidyaGauri Lal Chanana, Ex-Chairman, Finance Committee expired on 16.1.2008and 23.1.2008 respectively. The Ayurved Committee observed two minutessilence for the peace of departed souls and passed the following resolution toforward to the members of bereaved families:-

“The members of the Ayurved Committee were shocked to know the sad anduntimely demise of Vaidya Sriram Sharma, Ex-President, CCIM and VaidyaGL Chanana, Ex-Chairman, Finance Committee, devoted their lives to thecause of development of Indian Systems of Medicine in general andAyurveda in particular. Members of the Ayurveda Committee offer theircondolence and sympathy to the members of the bereaved families and prayto God that departed souls may rest in eternal peace.”

338y

Agenda Item No.1 Confirmation of the minutes of 37th

meeting of Ayurved Committee held on17th August, 2007 at New Delhi.

It was noted that minutes of 37th meeting of Ayurved Committee held on17.8.2007 was placed before the Central Council in its meeting held on18.8.2007 for consideration and ratification. The same were ratified by theCentral Council.

Ayurved Committee confirmed the same and also decided that actiontaken report of every meeting also be placed before the nextmeeting of Ayurved Committee as agenda item after the agenda itemof confirmation.

Agenda Item No.2 Uniformity in service conditions ofAyurved degree course teachers andPost-graduate Course teachers –regarding.

It was noted that a letter received from All India Ayurvedic TeachersAssociation, New Delhi received in this office regarding requesting foruniformity in service conditions of UG teachers and Post-graduate teachersand others. Content of the letter are as under:-

1. Age Limit: There should be a central guide line about upper and lowerage limits alongwith the relaxation for internal candidates and inexceptional case as well.

Further, there should be a clear-cut direction regarding thereappointment of and the maximum duration for retired teachers whetherthey are degree holders or post-graduate degree holders.

The backdoor entry of retired persons should be banned in the name ofdirector/advisor of a private Ayurved College.

2. Educational Qualification & Experience: Association feels that theminimum standards of Education in Indian Medicines (Amendment)Regulations 1989 and Ayurved Post-graduate Regulation 2005 should beconsolidated in case of Educational qualification and experience for eachcadre of teaching post. It is conflicting that a PhD. degree holder isgiven 2 years relaxation in teaching experience length by few employers.

438y

It is also conflicting that a person having 5 year teaching experience getspromotion to higher pay-scale of Reader of UG course whereas a post-graduate lecturer is promoted to the post of Reader (in the scale ofReader of UG) after total 8 years teaching experience.

Further, even the C.C.I.M. adopted the U.G.C. pattern in teaching cadrein March 1989 many states had continued the post of Demonstrator, Suchpersons are not being considered as teacher in case of experience.Therefore there should be a provision for equivalency of Demonstrator &Lecturer.

3. Pay-scale: There should be provision in case of U.G. & P.G. Courseteacher’s pay-scale that they should be given either UGC scales or thescales at par Modern Medical Science teachers. It is observed that inmany colleges the teachers are getting salary less than that of stipendof P.G. scholars.

4. N.P.A.: The policy of Central Govt. of N.P.A. for Ayurved teachersshould be unanimously complied by each & every employer.

5. Promotions/career Advancement: The promotion scheme or timebound career advancement scheme should be provided at par U.G.C.or at par Medical Colleges.

6. Leaves & Vacation: The teachers of Ayurved are professional courseteachers for the leave Rules should be made with provisions of leavesfor examinations, seminars, study leaves for re-orientation programsand other academic activities.

You are requested to frame the consolidated regulations for degreecourse and postgraduate degree course teachers incorporating the abovefacts.

Ayurved Committee considered the same and referred to theCommittee constituted for syllabus by Executive Committee.

Agenda Item No.3 Inclusion of Books in titled “SanskritAyurved Sudha” in Syllabus ofAyurvedacharya Course - regarding.

It was noted that a letter received from Dr. Banwari Lal Gaur, Jaipur forinclusion of book titled “Sanskrit Ayurved Sudha” in the syllabus ofAyurvedacharya Course as reference book.

538y

In this regard it was noted that as text book have already been prescribedand there is no provision of reference book in syllabus of Sanskrit subject.

Following content have been laid down in the syllabus:-

1-1 laLd`re~

}s iz’ui=s izR;sde~ & 100 vadk%ekSf[kd ijh{kk;ke~ & 50 vadk%O;k[;kukfu & 150 vadk%

izFkea Ik=e~ & 100 vadk%

1-O;kdj.ks & y?kqfl)kUrdkSeqnh % laKk & lfU/k & lekl & rf)r &L=hizR;; & & 50 vadk%

dkjdizdj.k & vO;; izdj.kkfu A

2- vuqokns & laf{kIr jpukuqokn dkSeqnh & Mk- dfiynso f}osnh& 40 vadk%

3- v’kqf)la’kks/kue~ & la’kks/kua lkekU;r% iqLrdlkis{ka Hkfo";fr& 10 vadk%

f}rh;a Ik=e & 100 vadk%

1- oS|dh; lqHkkf"krlkfgR;e~ (1&20 v/;k;k% ) & 40vadk%

(MkW- HkkLdj xksfoUn ?kk.ksdj )

2- vk;qosZnh;fgrksins’k% & (oS| j.kftr jk; nslkbZ ) & 30vadk%

3- iapra=e~ & vijhf{krdkjde~ & 30 vadk%

Ayurveda Committee considered the Issue and referred the matterto Sub Committee constituted for the purpose of syllabus.

638y

Agenda Item No.4 Lifting of limit on permissible attemptsand on the period of passing the firstProfessional examination for BAMS(Ayurvedacharya) Course of CCIM.

It was noted that a letter received from Dr. Ramesh Krishan Deshmukh,Members CCIM dated 21.11.2007 regarding lifting of limit on permissibleattempts and on the period of passing the first Professional examination forBAMS (Ayurvedacharya) Course of CCIM.

In this regard it was noted that MUHS, Nasik is allowing only six attempt toappear in the examination for passing first Professional examination.

In this regard issue was examined in view of the provision of the concernedRegulations which is as under:-

“relevant provision have been prescribed under “Indian Medicine CentralCouncil (Minimum Standards of Education in Indian Medicine) (amendment)Regulation 1989”.

“The subsequent First Professional Examination will be held every sixmonths and failed candidates shall ordinarily be allowed three chances forpassing First Professional Examination.

“However, a Student failed in one or more subjects of First ProfessionalExamination may be allowed to keep term in Second Professional Courseonly those students who passed in all subjects shall be allowed to take theThird Professional Examination”.

CCIM has revised the underlined provision of the above Regulation as underand has been made applicable from the date of January 21, 2006.

“Provided, a student failed in more than two subjects shall not be eligible tokeep the term”

738y

Further, it has also been stated that “a candidate failed in one or moresubjects in examination shall be eligible to appear in supplementaryexamination”.

“Candidate who fails to pass the First Professional Examination in threeopportunities shall not be allowed to continue their studies. However, in caseof personal illness of a serious nature of candidate and in unavoidableconditions/circumstances the Vice-chancellor of University may permit onemore opportunity for passing the first professional Course”.

It is evident from the above that if candidate fails to pass not a singlesubject in three opportunities shall not be allowed to continue the study aswell as chances taken on the basis of personal illness or opportunity given bythe Vice-Chancellor. These three chances have been increased by CentralCouncil of Indian Medicine from 3 to 5.

If any candidate pass one or more subject during first three chances as wellas exhausting a chance given by the Vice-Chancellor or personal illness shallbe allowed to keep term but before appearing in IIIrd professionalexamination shall have to clear all the subject of first professionalexamination.”

Reply was sent accordingly, however, matter is resubmitted forconsideration please.

Ayurveda Committee considered the matter and decided that

CCIM should give the final warning to MUHS, Nasik to adoptATKT as it is mandatory for every University. If it is notadopted by University, the Central Council shall be compelled torecommend to Government of India to withdraw therecognition of the degree of the University as per Section 21 ofIMCC Act, 1970.

Details of such students to whom ATKT has not been allowedbe asked.

Ayurved Committee also agreed to constitute a Committee togo for monitoring the activities of the Universities to follow theATKT and other Regulations, it should be started from MUHS

Agenda Item No.5 Issues related to Admission procedure,examination system etc. in BAMSCourse

838y

It was noted that Dr. SS Savrikar, Vice-Chancellor, Gujrat AyurvedUniversity, Jamnagar vide their letter No.VC/173 dated 13.12.2007submitted that there exists lot of basic differences in admission procedures,examination pattern, clinical training, Internship training programmes andother academic activities for BAMS courses in various Universities across thecountry. Such differences are resulting in considerable variation in theacademic standard of the Ayurved graduates ultimately leading to a sort ofchaotic situation at the fag end of their academic carrier. In such a situationthere is a dire need to bring reasonable uniformity in the rules governing allthe academic processes.

He has also submitted the suggestion to remove these ambiguity.

The content of letter are as under:-

Admission qualification

Although the basic qualification for B.A.M.S. course is 12th standardexamination, there is an ambiguity about the requirement of Sanskritsubject as a part of 12th standard examination. In some states likeGujarat, to be eligible for admission to B.A.M.S. course; apart for Physics,Chemistry and Biology the student should also pass Sanskrit examinationat 12th standard examination, whereas in some states like Maharashtra;Sanskrit is not a necessity and even if the student has passed Sanskritthe subject marks are not considered while deciding the merit.

Admission Procedure

There types are observed in admission procedure for B.A.M.S. course.

1. Admission purely on the basis of Marks obtained in Physics, Chemistryand Biology (+ marks of Sanskrit in some states) in 12th standardexamination.

2. Admission purely on the basis of Marks obtained in the entranceexamination.

3. Admission on the basis of Marks obtained in Physics, Chemistry andBiology (+ marks of Sanskrit in some states) in 12th standardexamination. + Marks obtained in the entrance examination. In suchcases the proportion of marks of qualifying examination and entranceexamination considered for preparation of merit list for admission alsovaries considerably from state to state.

938y

There is a dire need to take a suitable decision by the Council in thisregard. It is proposed that all the states should be asked to conductEntrance Examination and offer admissions purely on the basis of marksobtained in Entrance examination.

Inter-College and Inter-University Transfers

At present no rules exist for such transfers. The transfers are observed tobe effected randomly. Absence of such rules is giving room for unfairpractices. The Council should issue guidelines to be followed for suchtransfers. Once the annual admission procedure is completed, transfer ofthe student should not be permitted. However after passing the firstprofessional examination transfer may only be allowed in very unusualcircumstances as a very exceptional case. No transfers for trivial reasonsshould be allowed in any case. In no case inter-University transfer shouldbe permitted. Once the Clinical training of the student is started inSecond Professional course no transfer should be permitted. MCI hasalready framed such guidelines the Council may adopt the same.

Absence of students

In some cases although few in number, it is observed that the studentsjust disappear from the colleges in between their academic training forlong periods extending in years to reappear and claim eligibility forappearing in ensuing examinations. Surprisingly some institutions areobserved to accept such claims. No student should be allowed to enjoysuch conveniences. Council should issue clear directions to debar thestudent or struck off his name from the college register permanently if hiscontinuous absence from the institute exceeds more than a monthwithout permission of the institutional authorities. The authorities alsomay issue such permission only on reasonable grounds such as ill healthinviting such an absence.

Clinical Training

The Council curriculum advocates clinical training of 26 months but fewinstitutes adhere to this essential requirement. It is observed that clinicaltraining in most of the institutes starts after completion of 2nd

Professional course. It means students undergo only 12 to 14 monthsclinical training as against the requirement of 26 months. It is necessarythat as soon as the student passes the first professional examination heshould be posted for clinical training. Clear directions in this regard needto be issued.

1038y

It is also observed that the hospitals do not have designated wards andbeds distributed among different subject as per the requirement ofcurriculum. They generally have only male and female wards.

Examination pattern

Examination is very sensitive issue deeply concerned with the academiccarrier of the students. A lot of ambiguity appears to be existing in thissystem with few respectable exceptions. There is a dire need to issuestrict guidelines with an object of bringing total transparency in thissystem. Universities follow their own examination patterns. Without goinginto details of the patterns followed by Universities I will like to givefollowing suggestions in this regard.

Internal Assessment

Internal Assessment should be made a part of all Universityexaminations. 10% weightage should be given to internal assessment intheory as well as practical examinations in all subjects. However theinternal assessment should not be left to the mercy of teachers. Themarks of Internal Assessment should be based on the performance of thestudent in internal examination conducted by the college on its own.

The colleges may be asked to maintain the record of such examination.This record should be made available to all the concerned authorities fromUniversity. The student should also have an access to this record.Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik and Gujarat AyurvedUniversity have developed such a mechanism. Council can refer thesystems prevalent in these Universities.

Question Paper Pattern

At present each theory paper is carrying maximum 100 marks. In most ofthe Universities the question paper contains 5 (each of 20 marks) to 10questions (each of 10 marks). All these questions are descriptive innature inviting wide variation in the subjective assessment by theexaminers leading to restlessness among the students. It is necessarythat the performance of the student should be assessed more and moreobjectively giving no room for any controversies. I suggest followingmeasures in this regard.

1138y

If Internal Assessment system as described above is accepted the theorypaper will be carrying 90 marks. Each question paper may be divided inthree sections of equal weight i.e. a question paper of 90 marks may bedivided in three sections carrying 30 marks each. The three sections willbe

1. Multiple Choice Question Section2. Short Answer Question section3. Long Answer Question Section

Such a division will give the student reasonable opportunity to express hisknowledge in respect of all types of questions. Such a division will alsobring more objectivity in the assessment system.

Practical Examination Pattern

There is a dire need to bring more and more transparency in practical;examinations. Many unworthy and unhappy incidents are repeatedlyreported in these examinations. Most of the times the students arereported to be exploited in these examination but case of harassment ofexaminers are also not uncommon. Under the circumstances objectivityneeds to be brought in these examinations. I have following suggestionsto make in this regard.

1. Minimum weight should be given to oral examination.2. No oral examination should be conducted by one single examiner to

avoid one to one confrontation with the student.3. Records of all practical examination such as original history sheet with

diagnosis of the patient along with the related answer sheet of thestudent showing findings and diagnosis made by the student should bepreserved. Similarly answer sheet of the student on which student hasentered the details of his practical experiment. An examination basedon the spot identification of a fixed number of subjects/objects shouldbe an integral part of each practical examination. New methods ofobjective assessment in practical examination should be introduced.Practical examinations in the subjects like Sanskrit, Samhita andpadarth Vigyan where there are no experiments perform should beimmediately stopped.

Provisions of Re-assessment of answer books, Re-practical andA.T.K.T.

1238y

There is a dire need to throw away these prevalent practices. Thesepractices are giving open invitation to malpractices and making the studentscrippled creatures throughout their lives. If the examination system is mademore and more transparent and more and more objective as suggestedabove there will be no room for these practices.

Provision of Grace Marks

It is observed that there is a wide variation in provision of grace marks. Theyrange from 5 to 50. There is a dire need to bring out uniformity in allotmentof grace marks.

A simple solution to most of the above problem is introduction of gradingsystem in place of numerical evaluation of performance of students in theexaminations: You may be aware the most of the Universities areabandoning the numerical assessment system. U.G.C. strongly recommendsgrading system. The knowledge Commission has also stressed the need ofgrading system for giving full justice to the students’ performanceevaluation.

I have tried to highlight some of the important issues related to studentcarrier. I know that most of the people will like to leave these problems withthe University but Universities are not doing much in this regard due tovarious reasons. Hence as an apex regulatory body in Ayurvedic education itwill be most appropriate for the Council to issue minimum guidelines in allrespects with an object of maintenance of minimum standards. It isobserved that the students are falling prey of many malpractices because ofage old subjective practices. The Council will be doing a great service to thewelfare of students and Ayurveda by taking suitable action in this regard.Considering the importance of the subject I hope action will be initiated atthe earliest.

Ayurved Committee considered the same and decided to refer thematter to Sub Committee constituted by Executive Committee for thepurpose of syllabus.

Agenda Item No.6 Consideration of visitation report of

1338y

Ayurved colleges for furnishingrecommendations to Government of Indiafor issuing/not issuing Letter ofPermission.

It was noted that after receipt of the proposal from Government of India forestablishment of Ayurved college, starting PG Course a fresh or an additionalsubjects and increasing intake capacity and after examination of Schemeand visitation, the recommendations were sent to Government of India forissuing/not issuing Letter of Intent for colleges. It was further noted thatGovernment of India has issuing Letter of Intent as per details given below.Accordingly following colleges have been visited by the visitors of the CCIMto verify the compliance submitted by the college in response ofshortcomings informed by Government of India.

Ayurveda Committee discuss the visitation reports and decided asunder:-

S.No.

Name of the College Decision of Ayurved Committee

1. Vasant Kusum RuralYoga & AyurvedSansthan SiddhakalaAyurved Mahavidyalaya,Sangamner

The Ayurveda Committee afterconsidering the visitation/ verificationreport and all relevant papers decidedto recommend to Government of Indiafor issuing letter of permission forstarting PG in

Balroga 02Prasuti Avm Striroga 02

2. Yerala Medical Trust &Ayurved College, Distt.Raigad, MUMBAI

The Ayurveda Committee afterconsidering the visitation/ verificationreport and all relevant papers decidedto recommend to Government of Indiafor issuing letter of permission forincreasing intake capacity from 50to 60 and to start PG in

Kayachikitsa 04Dravyaguna 04Rasashastra 04

1438y

Bhaishajya Kalpana 04Shalakya 04

3. Annasaheb DangeAyurved College , AtAshta, Tal. Valva,SANGALI


Rachna Sharir 05.4. P.N. Pannikar,

Kasargard, Kerala,The Ayurveda Committee afterconsidering the visitation/ verificationreport and all relevant papers decidedto recommend to Government of Indiafor issuing letter of permission forestablishment of new AyurvedCollege with intake capacity of 50.

5. National Institute ofAyurveda, Jaipur

The Ayurveda Committee afterconsidering the visitation/ verificationreport and all relevant papers decidedto recommend to Government of Indiafor issuing letter of permission forstarting PG in:-

Shalakya 06Prasuti & Striroga 06Agadtantra 06

6. Ajeevan SwasthyaSanvardhan AyurvedMahvidhyala, Satna

The Ayurveda Committee afterconsidering the visitation/ verificationreport and all relevant papers decidedto recommend to Government of Indiafor issuing letter of permission forestablishment of new AyurvedCollege with intake capacity of 50.

7. Ashvin Rural AyurvedCollege, Sadhvi PreetiSudhaji Maharaj Nagar,Manchi Hill

The Ayurveda Committee afterconsidering the visitation/ verificationreport and all relevant papers decidedto recommend to Government of Indiafor issuing letter of permission forincreasing intake capacity from 40to 50.

1538y

8. M.N.R. Ayurved College,Madek


9. Vageshwari AyurvedCollege, A.P.


10. Arogya Institute ofRichbarchil, Indore


11. Dr. BRKR AyurvedCollege, SR Nagar,HYDERABAD 500038(AP)

The Ayurveda Committee afterconsidering the visitation/ verificationreport and all relevant papers decidedto recommend to Government of Indiafor issuing letter of permission forstarting new PG in:-

Panchkarma 06Ayurved Samhita 06

12. VPS Varier AyurvedCollege, Kottakkal,Distt. Malappuram,EDARIKODE 676501

The Ayurveda Committee afterconsidering the visitation/ verificationreport and all relevant papers decidedto recommend to Government of Indiafor issuing letter of permission for tostart new PG in

Dravyaguna 04Panchkarma 04Swasthavritta 04

13. Government Ayurved The Ayurveda Committee after

1638y

College, DhanwantriNagar Distt. Ernakulam,P.O. TRIPUNITURA

considering the visitation/ verificationreport and all relevant papers decidedto recommend to Government of Indiafor issuing letter of permission forincreasing intake capacity from 30to 50 and to start PG in

Dravyaguna 04Panchkarma 04Shalakya 04Rasashastra &Bhaishajya Kalpana 04

14 Shri Vijay MahentheshAyurvedic MedicalCollege, PB No.15,ILKAL


15. Uttam Rao Ji AyurvedMahavidhalaya, Washim


16. Shri VivekanandAyurved Mahavidyalaya,Rahuri factory,Ahmednagar

The Ayurveda Committee afterconsidering the visitation/ verificationreport and all relevant papers decidedto recommend to Government of Indiafor issuing letter of permission forincreasing intake capacity infollowing PG:-

Kayachikitsa 04 to 06Prasuti & Striroga 04 to 06

And to start new PG in:-

Rasashastra 04Roganidan 04Shalakya (Netraroga) 04

17. Punjab Ayurved MedicalCollege & Hospital,

The Ayurveda Committee afterconsidering the visitation/ verification

1738y

Shriganganagar report and all relevant papers decidedto recommend to Government of Indiafor issuing letter of permission forestablishment of new AyurvedCollege with intake capacity of 50.

18. SS Jambagi AyurvedCollege,


19. Chatra Ayurved College,Chatra

The Ayurveda Committee afterconsidering the visitation/ verificationreport and all relevant papers decidednot to recommend to Governmentof India for issuing letter ofpermission for establishment ofnew Ayurved College.

It was further noted that visitation report of Government AyurvedCollege, Bangalore was not received so could not be considered byAyurved Committee.

vfrfjDr dk;Zlwph en la[;k 7 fodze fo’ofo|ky;]mTtSu }kjk iznRr

vk;qosZnkpk;Z (ch-,-,e-,l-),oa vk;qosZn okpLifr (,e-Mh-vk;qosZn) dks Hkkjrh;fpfdRlk dsUnzh; ifj"knvf/kfu;e] 1970 dh f}rh; esalfEefyr djus ds lEcU/k esa A

vafdr fd;k x;k fd fodze fo’ofo|ky;] mTtSu }kjk iznRr cSpyj vkQvk;qosZn fon ekMZu esfMflu ,.M ltZjh mikf/k 1964 ls vkxs Hkkjrh;fpfdRlk dsUnzh; ifj"kn vf/kfu;e] 1970 dh f}rh; vuqlwph esa lfEefyrgSA vr% ekU; fpfdRlh; vgZrk gS A

1838y

fo’ofo|ky; }kjk dsUnzh; ifj"kn }kjk lapkfyr ikB~;dze lEcU/khmikf/k;kWa ;Fkk vk;qosZnkpk;Z (ch-,-,e-,l-) vk;qosZn okpLifr (,e-Mh- vk;qosZn) Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk dsUnzh; ifj"kn~ vf/kfu;e] 1970 dhf}rh; vuqlwph esa lfEefyr ugh gS vr% ekU; vgZrk ugh gS A

Hkkjr ljdkj }kjk Ik=kad oh-27016@1@2007&vk;q-MsLd fnukad 27flrEcj]2007 ds ek/;e ls Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk dsUnzh; ifj"kn~ vf/kfu;e]1970 dh /kkjk 14(2) ds vuqlkj Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk dsUnzh; ifj"kn~ dsfVIIk.kh gsrq vxzlkfjr fd;k x;k gS A

fodze fo’ofo|ky; ls lEcfU/kr fuEu egkfo|ky; ls fuEu fooj.kkuqlkjikB~;dze lapkfyr djus gsrq ekU; gS A

(i) jktdh; /kUoUrfj vk;qosZn egkfo|ky;]mTtSu Lukrdh; dk;fpfdRlk&03] jpuk’kkjhj&02] nzO;xq.k&04

(ii) ia- f’ko ’kfDryky ’kekZ vk;qosZn egkfo|ky;] jryke Lukrdh; &40

(iii) Jherh /kfj;k izHkknsoh ltksfr;k vk;qosZn egkfo|ky;] uheFkqj Lukrdh;Hkkjr ljdkj }kjk 2007&08 ls vuqefr izkIr

bu egkfo|ky;ksa dk le;≤ ij ifjn’kZu Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk dsUnzh; ifj"kn}kjk vuqefr iznku dh x;h gS A

mailto:oh-27016@1

mailto:@2007&vk

1938y

fo'ofo|ky;]cksMZ;k fpfdRlh; laLFkkdk uke

EkkU;rk izkIrfpfdRlh; vgZrk

jftLVªhdj.kds fy,laf{kIr

vof/k

CkSpyj vkQvk;qosZn fonekMZuesfMflu ,.MltZjh

ch-,-,e-,l- 1964 ls1981 rd

vk;qosZnkpk;Z(cSpyj vkQvk;qosZnesfMflu ,.MltZjh)

ch-,-,e-,l- 1982 lsvkxs

vk;qosZnokpLifrMkDVj vkQesfMflu(vk;qosZn)

MkDVjvkQesfMflu(vk;qosZn)

,e-Mh-(vk;qosZn)

2001 lsvkxs

fo’ofo|ky; }kjk dsUnzh; ifj"kn }kjk fofgr ikB~;dze o ikB~;fooj.k dsvuqlkj gS ikB~;dze lapkfyr fd, tk jgs gSa A

mikf/k dh ukekofy Hkh dsUnzh; ifj"kn }kjk fofgr fu;ekofy ds vuq:IkgS A vr% fo’ofo|ky; }kjk iznRr mikf/k fuEukuqlkj Hkkjrh; fpfdRlkdsUnzh; ifj"kn vf/kfu;e] 1970 dh f}rh; vuqlwph esa lfEefyr djus gsrqHkkjr ljdkj dks vuq’kalk, Hksth tk ldrh gSa A

2038y

egkfo|ky; }kjk eq[; lqfo/kk,a fuEu izdkj miyC/k gS

Ekgkfo|ky; dkuke

’k;~;kvksa dhla[;k

Vhafpx LVkQ

jktdh; /kUoUrfjvk;qosZn egkfo|ky;]mTtSu

06&08&2007160

24

ia- f’ko ’kfDryky’kekZ vk;qosZnegkfo|ky;] jryke

25&05&200570

31

Jherh /kfj;kizHkknsoh ltksfr;kvk;qosZn egkfo|ky;]uheFkqj

IzkFkeckj2007&08 150l= dh vuqefr nh x;h

15

Ayurveda Committee decided to obtained the details of studentspassed from 1982 to till date and original copy of cancelled degreebe asked.

Agenda Item No.8 Syllabus for proposed PG Course inAsthi Sandhi Roga & Aghat Vigyan inAyurveda.

It was noted that Education Commi5ttee in its meeting held on 16.8.2007considering the issue decided to obtain the detail syllabus of the same forconsideration.

Ayurved Committee referred the matter to Sub Committeeconstituted by Executive Committee for the purpose of syllabus.

Agenda Item No.9 Placement in academics.

It was noted that a letter dated 18.1.2008 received from Dr. Deshraj Singh,Dr. Sarvesh Dubey and Dr. Girish Mishra, MD (Ayurved) (Kayachikitsa)stated that “the resident doctors of Ayurveda Vachaspati (MD Ayurved)Manovigyan avam Manasroga faculty of Ayurveda IMS, BHU, Varanasi want

2138y

to draw your kind attention regarding placement in academics. Sir as far aswe know there is no separate department for this PG course in India, so inwhich department we can apply academics after completion of our course.

Sir, we also want to inform you that we are entitled here in department ofKayachikitsa for the degree of MD (Ayurved) Kayachikitsa (Manasroga) inour respective batches.”

Ayurveda Committee referred the issue to the Sub Committeefor the purpose of Syllabus.

Addl. Agenda Item No.1 Approval of Syllabus of AshtangHrydayam for the Syllabus ofAyurvedacharya Course.

It was noted that Central Council had passed that Ashtang Hydyam (SurtraSthanam) should be taught to the students of first professional ofAyurvedacharya Course in stead of Ashtang Sangraha (Surtra Sthanam).Accordingly, the proposal was processed and after obtaining the commentsof State Government as required under Section 22 of IMCC Act, 1970 andsanctioned by Government of India as required under Section 36 of IMCCAct, 1970 the same has been notified by Central Council of Indian Medicine.

It was further noted that Course content of syllabus of Ashtang Hrdyam(Sutra Sthanam) was not prepared. However, the same has been preparedwith the consultation of Vaidya Banwari Lal Gaur, Vice-Chancellor, RajasthanAyurved University, Jodhpur and Prof. OP Upadhyaya, National Institute ofAyurveda, Jaipur.

Ayurved Committee decided that a Sub Committee of experts beconstituted to consider the same consisting of Prof. BL Gaur, Prof.RR Dwivedi and Prof. Vasudevan Namboodri.

Addl. Agenda Item No.2 Inclusion/Recognition of AyurvedDhanwantri MS (Ayurved) inSecond Schedule to IMCC Act,1970.

It was noted that Government of India has forwarded the request ofthe University to furnish the comments for inclusion of Ayurved

2238y

Dhanwantri MS (Ayurved) by Bhartiya Vidyapeeth, Pune in SecondSchedule to IMCC Act, 1970.

It was further noted that on recommendations of the CCIM and aftersatisfying with the Minimum Standards and Requirements and allrelevant papers. Government of India was permitted the college toconduct the PG Course in following subjects:-

Shalakya with intake of four seats.

Ayurveda Committee decided that recommendations may besent to Government of India for inclusion/recognition inSecond Schedule to IMCC Act, 1970.

Agenda Item No.3 Resolutions of the members.

1. Resolution of Dr. KG Chandrappa

a) Regarding Regulation and Syllabus of BAMS

Ayurveda is the ocean of knowledge. It has to be globalized and so alsostudents of Ayurveda should feel proud about this science. And thusAyurveda should be taught in simple and easier ways, even the commonperson should be aware of this shastra. As the world is moving faster withsoftware technology, to move and maintain the pace with other be alliedsciences.

The syllabus has remained unchanged since long time. This is high time tochange this syllabus in view of maintaining the pace with this fast movingworld. To attain globalization of Ayurveda, students should have thoroughknowledge of Ayurveda along with its applied aspects in this modernscenario.

Regarding this matter, a workshop was conducted in S.D.M. AyurvedicMedical College Hassan through Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences,Bangalore by the Principal Forum of Ayurvedic Medical Colleges Karnataka.

I forward this proposed copy of the syllabus for resolution during themeeting and oblige.

2338y

b) Minimum number of teaching staff

As per the scheduled work load of teaching staff, President of AyurvedicMedical Colleges Associations federation Karnataka has requested forminimum number of teaching staff for BAMS Course. They have calculatedand submitted the ratio of students and teaching staff.However, to maintain the standards of the colleges and to meet thedemands of the scheduled work, considering their request I am here withforwarding the ratio between students and teaching staff which is asfollows:-

Student’s strength required teaching staff50 3075 35100 40

c) Eligibility for teaching staff

Teachers of Graduate Association have requested to consider the teacherswho were appointed as lectures during 1989-2000 with BSAM (BAMS)Degree, as an eligible teacher to teach in Ayurvedic Medical Colleges in ourcountry with equal dignity.

Considering their long time service rendered in their respective collegesCCIM can consider their request and give them justice, I am forwarding theirrequest to the apex body.

2. Proposed by Dr. RK Deshmukh, Seconded by Dr. DRamanathan

d) The Post Graduation in Ayurveda is facing a huge threat. Theparamount reasons are listed out for your attention:

1. M.S. Ophthalmologist (Ayu) cannot operate cataract because 1994Organ Transplantation Act prevents him from doing so.

2. M.D.(Gynec) cannot conduct deliveries in an obstetric emergenciesbecause, surgically it is not possible for M.D. (Ayu) under M.T.P. Actamendment 2002 prevents him to do so.

3. M.S. Surgery(Ayu) is not legally relevant as a surgical degree in anycourt of law in India, because State Council has no separate provisionfor M.D. or M.S. course as consultant.

2438y

This is creating disinterest in the ayurvedic doctors to pursue the postgraduation. So, in order to bring ayurveda physicians to the forefront, moresteps in the direction of making these degrees acceptable by all theinstitutions and the Ministry. Resolved that necessary amendments aremade to these acts, so that the M.S. Ophthalmologist (Ayu), M.D.(Gynec) ,M.S. Surgery(Ayu) are able practice these with the help of the moderntechniques.

In order to study this matter, a committee should be formed and the Councilshould take necessary steps to implement the amendments at all levels.

(e) In the meeting of the Health Secretaries / Ayush Directors ofsouthern states held at Chennai on 11/01/08, the eligibility of theinstitutions for up gradation was discussed in detail. At that time, I hadmentioned about the availability of teaching staff in non-clinical subjectsbeing a great difficulty in most of the AYUSH institutions. Hence thecondition of 80% teaching staff should be waived off initially for 5 years.While agreeing with this observation Sri. Vijay Kumar, Commissioner,Andhra Pradesh mentioned that they have identified the allied subjects forall Ayurvedic specialties. The Joint Secretary Sri. Shiv Basant asked to sendtheir recommendation and clarified that all AYUSH colleges Private orGovernment must fulfill the minimum norms for PG qualified teachers. Itwas clarified that some adjustments can be made in declaring allied subjectsfor subjects in which PGs are not available, but a minimum number of PGteachers must be there before 01/04/2008, otherwise such colleges wouldface closure.

In relation to this I would like to furnish some details:-1) In 1995, as per the C.C.I.M norms the colleges followed a 4 tier system inthe teaching faculties for each department, i.e 1 Professor, 1 Reader, 1senior Lecturer and 1 Lecturer. So, with 14 departments there were 56teaching staffs.In the last 5 years this 4 tier system was modified into 2 and ½ tier system.i.e.35 teaching staffs is the present scenario in the colleges, i.e, 7Departments with 1 professor, 1 Reader and 1 lecturer …7 * 3 = 21, and 7departments with 1 professor or 1 Reader and 1 Lecturer, i.e, 7 * 2 = 14,21+ 14=35 (Maulika Sidhanthas= 1 professor, 2 Lecturers, No Reader).

Now a debate is going on to change the 2 and ½ tier system into just 2 tiersystem. As it will be very economically viable for the college managements,they are doing their best to pressurize the C.C.I.M & AYUSH Dept. toimplement the same. Whether 2 tier system or 2 and ½ tier system, we theC.C.I.M need to have a detailed discussion regarding this, and should

2538y

implement the best system with the motive of quality education and not forthe economical viability of the colleges.

2) Now C.C.I.M and AYUSH is permitting new colleges every year. Definitelynew colleges coming up will very much benefit Ayurveda. But, we do notunderstand the problems faced by new colleges and we should implement orrelax rules and make them friendlier and also which can help them todevelop.

I have attached an annexure regarding the clinical and Non clinical Postgraduation seats. (Annexure A). Now since the C.C.I.M has implementedSubject wise teaching staff, you can see, as per the annexure the nonclinical seats for P.G is very low, so there are very limited teachers availablefor that respective teaching post. And because of that the collegemanagement is not able to get the right teachers for non clinical subjectslike Rachana sareera and Kriya sareera etc. This situation is making thecollege authority to indulge in malpractices during the C.C.I.M inspection toprove that they have subject wise teaching staffs by hiring some doctors onthe day of inspection. We have to look into this and by analyzing it a fiveyear moratorium or any other alternative solution should be implemented.

In the Indian Medicine Central Council (Minimum Standards of Education InIndian Medicine) Amendment Regulations, in Clause No.14, Qualifications &Experience for Teaching Staff, in sub clause (iii), If the post – graduatequalification holders for the following subjects are not available, the post –graduate qualification obtained in the subject as noted against the subjectshall be admissible:

Name of the subject Discipline of Post-graduate

1. Swastha Vritta 1. Kaya Chikitsa, 2. Basic Principle2. Agad Tantra 1. Kaya Chikitsa, 2.Dravya Guna3. Padarth Vigyan/Samhita/Itihas 1. Basic Principles4. Rog Vigyan 1. Kaya Chikitsa5. Rachana Sharir/Kriya Sharir 1. Sharir 2. Basic Principles6. Shalakya 1. Shalakya / Shalya7. Nischetna Avam Ksha – Kiran 1. Shalya and Shalakya

It can be noted that, out of the total 14 subjects, only 8 subjects are namedhere. If the remaining 6 subjects, viz.,

8. Maulik Sidhant9. Rasashastra10. Prasuti & Striroga

2638y

11. Kaumarbhritya12. Panchakarma13. Shalyam

All the remaining 6 streams should be given “desirable post-graduation” as“Kayachikitsa or Basic Principle”. As there are more post graduates from thestream of “Kaya Chikitsa”, or “Saalakya”, these 2 subjects should be givenas the “desirable post-graduation” in all the 14 streams of Ayurveda.

Here, also, we have to understand the difficulties faced by the collegeauthorities and we should hold detailed discussions on how to solve the nonavailability of these particular subject knowing persons. It would befavourable for the colleges to continue the courses, without having to facethe closure.

Attachment as follows:-

NON CLINICAL SUBJECTS

Svastha Vritha (Basic principles) 34Ayurveda Darsana & Sidhantha 11Ayurveda Samhitha Siddhantha 27Maulika Sidhantha 17Dravya Guna 82Baishajya Kalpana 30Rasa Shasthra 87Roga Nidhana or Vikrithi Vijnana 29Rachana Shareera 50Kriya Shareera 44Agada Tanthra 19

Grand Total for PG 430CLINICAL SUBJECTS

Kaya Chikitsa 192Pancha karma 49Koumara Brithya 28Prasoothi & Sthree roga 48Shalya Tanthra 98Shalakya Tanthra 47Sanggahara 1Manasa roga 9

2738y

Grand Total 472

* Source:- CCIM- Annual Report & Audited Accounts, 2005-2006

Ayurveda Committee referred the all the above resolutions toEducation Committee (Ayurved) for opinion.

3. Resolution of Dr. SS Savirkar

a) Recognition of Ayurvedic Pharmacy Courses.

There are about 8000 Ayurvedic Pharmacies spread all over India. Thesepahramcies require in Ayurvedic Pharmacy for manufacture of AyurvedicMedicine. Some of the Universities are conducting Diploma in AyurvedicPharmacy (D.Phar.-Ayu.) Bachelor of Ayu. Pharmacy (B.Phar.- Ayu.) andMaster of Ayu. Pharmacy (M.Phar.-Ayu.) Courses. However these coursesare not recognized by any national statutory bodies like AICTE or PharmacyCouncil of India as Ayurvedic courses do not fall under their purview. It isreported that the degree holders in Ayu. Pharmacy are being denied manyopportunities. For want of recognition form statutory Councils.

On this background it is proposed that CCIM being the statutory Councilmonitoring Ayurvedic education may take up monitoring and control of Ayu.Pharmacy courses and recognizes them.Ayurved Committee decided to refer the matter to Government ofIndia.

b) Making Reorientation Training Programme mandatory for CarrierAdvancement of teachers.

Training of trainers is the dire need for updated the knowledge of teachers.It has been observed that quality of teaching has become a subject of greatconcern in the field of Ayurvedic education. In conventional educationReorientation training of teachers is mandatory for their carrierAdvancement according to U.G.C. govt. of India is having scheme forreorientation training programmes for these programmes for Ayurvedicteachers. Adequate funds are also provided to organizers for theseprogrammes through this scheme. However the scheme is not gettingadequate response as these programmes are not mandatory for teachers.

It is proposed that Reorientation Programmes of one month duration (Fourprogrammes of one week of two programmes of 15 days) may be mademandatory for Carrier Advancement of Teachers in Ayurvedic College.

2838y

Ayurved Committee referred the matter to Education Committee(Ayurved).

4. Resolution of Dr. Ved Prakash Tyagi, Dr. SC Gupta. Dr.Yuvraj Tyagi & two others.

vk;qosZnkpk;Z BAMS esa izos’k ;ksX;rk 10+2 es 50% vadksdh ck/;rk gS A orZeku esa vk;qosZn egkfo|ky;ksa esa Nk=ugha fey jgs gsSa A dqi;k bl fo"k; ij fopkj dj fu.kZ; fy;k tkosA

Ayurveda Committee agreed to reduce the eligibility criteria foradmission to Ayurvedacharya Course. It is (for 10+2 pass) alsoresolved to write to all State Government for their opinion beforeMarch 2008 and placed the same before the Executive Committeeand then be referred to next CCIM meeting.

Meeting concluded with a vote of thanks to the Chair.

*****

*****

2938y

Agenda Item No.3 Suggestions of Expert Committee forSwasthavritta

It is submitted that

The existing syllabus should be reconstructed with regards to certainaspects.

The portions of Yoga & Naturopathy in the existing syllabus should beclubbed together to make one part of one paper for fifty marks and theremaining other part of the same paper should be attributed to therelevant portion of Ayurved as follows:-

Paper I – Part A (50 Marks) Part B (50 Marks)(1) Vyaktigata Swasthyam(2) Dina charya(3) Ratri charya(4) Ritu Charya- and Ritu

Evam Vatarana Jnanam(5) Sadvritta(6) Roganutpadaniya(7) Aharavidhi(8) Ahara Poshana(9) Ahara Pareekshana(10) Ahara Drayas

(1) Vayu(2) Bhumi(3) Jala(4) Praksha(5) Apadravya(6) Shaucha Sthana(7) Sava Vinasa Paddhati(8) Oudyogika Swasthyam &

Swasthya NasakaVibhinna Vyavasaya

(9) Vidyalaya Swasthyam(10) Janapaddodhwamsa(11) Chikitsalaya Bhavana

Paper II – Part A (50 Marks) Part B (50 Marks)(1) Yoga ( 12 chapters)(2) Naturopathy (8 Chapters)

(1) Swasthya Prasasanam(2) Swasthya Visayaka

Sankalana(3) Prathamika Swasthya

Samrakshana(4) Rashtriya Karyakrama(5) Parivara Kalyana

Karyakrama

3038y

(6) Matru sisu KalyanaKaryakrama

(7) Viswa SwasthyaSanghatanam

The review and amendment in the syllabus should be done atleastalternate yearly.

As per today’s, the syllabus should be divided into 5 units per part perpaper, every unit bearing equal marks (ten each approx.)

The tens papers of the subject may be divided as paper 1 – VaiyaktikaSwasthya (personal Hygiene) & Paper-II- Samajika Swasthavritta(Community Hygiene). The two divisions of each paper should be as:-

Paper 1 A - Vaiyaktika SwasthyaPaper 1 B - Yoga Evam NisargopacharaPaper 2 A - Samajik SwasthyaPaper 2 B - Prathmik Swasthya Samrakshana- Rashtriya

Karyakrama etc.

Detailing of the syllabus must be done to explain & justify the pointsincluded.

The concept of Health and hospital management should be added tothe subject.

The concept of Santarpana Apatarpanotha Janya Vyadhi should beadded in the syllabus.

The concept of food adulteration and its effects must be added. New diseases like Dengue, Chickungunia, Bird flue. Anthrax etc. should

be added. Concept of Environmental Study, Natural Calamities & Disaster

management should be added. Concept of epidemiology of non-communicable Diseases like

Hypertension, Diabetes, Obesity etc. should be added.

Agenda Item No.4 Translation and correction of thesyllabus. - regarding

It is submitted that a letter dated 29.12.2007 received from Dr. BKBhagwat, Dr. Kamlesh Kumar Sharma, Dr. Arpan Bhatt, Dr. PramodkumarSharma and Dr. Sudhakar Reddy regarding modification required in thepresent BAMS Syllabus of Kaumarbhritta. The letter may please be seen atAnnexure ‘A’.

3138y

Submitted please.

5. Govt. Ayurved College,Bangalore


Rasashastra 06Rognidan & Vikriti Vigyan 06.

CENTRAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN MEDICINENEW DELHI

Recommendations of Ayurved Committee held on 23.2.2008

S.No.

Name of the College Decision of Ayurved Committee

1. Vasant Kusum RuralYoga & AyurvedSansthan SiddhakalaAyurved Mahavidyalaya,Sangamner

The Ayurveda Committee afterconsidering the visitation/ verificationreport and all relevant papers decidedto recommend to Government of Indiafor issuing letter of permission forstarting PG in

Balroga 02

3238y

Prasuti Avm Striroga 02

2. Yerala Medical Trust &Ayurved College, Distt.Raigad, MUMBAI


Kayachikitsa 04Dravyaguna 04Rasashastra 04Bhaishajya Kalpana 04Shalakya 04

3. Annasaheb DangeAyurved College , AtAshta, Tal. Valva,SANGALI


Rachna Sharir 05.

4. P.N. Pannikar,Kasargard, Kerala,


5. National Institute ofAyurveda, Jaipur

The Ayurveda Committee afterconsidering the visitation/ verificationreport and all relevant papers decidedto recommend to Government of Indiafor issuing letter of permission forstarting PG in:-

Shalakya 06Prasuti & Striroga 06

3338y

Agadtantra 066. Ajeevan Swasthya

Sanvardhan AyurvedMahvidhyala, Satna


7. Ashvin Rural AyurvedCollege, Sadhvi PreetiSudhaji Maharaj Nagar,Manchi Hill


8. M.N.R. Ayurved College,Madek


9. Vageshwari AyurvedCollege, A.P.


10. Arogya Institute ofRichbarchil, Indore


11. Dr. BRKR AyurvedCollege, SR Nagar,HYDERABAD 500038(AP)

The Ayurveda Committee afterconsidering the visitation/ verificationreport and all relevant papers decidedto recommend to Government of India

3438y

for issuing letter of permission forstarting new PG in:-

Panchkarma 06Ayurved Samhita 06

12. VPS Varier AyurvedCollege, Kottakkal,Distt. Malappuram,EDARIKODE 676501


Dravyaguna 04Panchkarma 04Swasthavritta 04

13. Government AyurvedCollege, DhanwantriNagar Distt. Ernakulam,P.O. TRIPUNITURA


Dravyaguna 04Panchkarma 04Shalakya 04Rasashastra &Bhaishajya Kalpana 04

14 Shri Vijay MahentheshAyurvedic MedicalCollege, PB No.15,ILKAL


15. Uttam Rao Ji AyurvedMahavidhalaya, Washim


16. Shri VivekanandAyurved Mahavidyalaya,

The Ayurveda Committee afterconsidering the visitation/ verification

3538y

Rahuri factory,Ahmednagar

report and all relevant papers decidedto recommend to Government of Indiafor issuing letter of permission forincreasing intake capacity infollowing PG:-

Kayachikitsa 04 to 06Prasuti & Striroga 04 to 06

And to start new PG in:-

Rasashastra 04Roganidan 04Shalakya (Netraroga) 04

17. Punjab Ayurved MedicalCollege & Hospital,Shriganganagar


18. SS Jambagi AyurvedCollege,


19. Chatra Ayurved College,Chatra

The Ayurveda Committee afterconsidering the visitation/ verificationreport and all relevant papers decidednot to recommend to Governmentof India for issuing letter ofpermission for establishment ofnew Ayurved College.

It was further noted that visitation report of Government AyurvedCollege, Bangalore was not received so could not considered byAyurved Committee.

central council of indian medicine new delhi agenda item no.1 confirmation of the minutes of 37th...

Documents