center for economic and business research 2008 conference deregulation and rural banking in...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
217 views
TRANSCRIPT
Center for Economic and Business Research 2008 Conference
Deregulation and Rural Banking in Southeast Missouri
by
Michael Devaney
• From the nation’s beginning, people from the rural regions distrusted “eastern” financial interests. Thomas Jefferson, the first Secretary of State, was suspicious of Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton
• This distrust was reflected in President Andrew Jackson’s 1832 veto of the second bank of the United States
• Rural and midwestern distrust of the financial system later became an issue at the 1896 Democratic convention in Chicago where William Jennings Bryan delivered his Cross of Gold speech.
• Bryan advocated a bimetal silver/gold monetary standard.
• Populists believed that the bimetal standard would reverse the 1873 to1896 deflation and make it easier for farmers to pay off their debts to money lenders
The Famous Quote From Bryan’s Speech
• “Having behind us the producing masses of this nation and the world, supported by the commercial interests, the laboring interests and the toilers everywhere, we will answer their demand for a gold standard by saying to them: You shall not press down upon the brow of labor this crown of thorns, you shall not crucify mankind upon a cross of gold.”
Some believed that if urban, money center banks were allowed to open branches in rural areas that they would upstream deposits to the larger cities rather than lending in local markets.
Beginning in the 1920s each state was allowed to establish bank branching laws. A state could be:
• A unit banking state i.e., no branching• A limited-branching state• An unlimited branching state
• Missouri was a limited-branching state
Unit and limited-branching states tended to be located in the mid-west while unlimited branching states tended to concentrate on the east and west coasts.
By the 1970s it had become apparent that because of improvements in information technology and data base management branching restrictions contributed to significant inefficiency in the banking system.
In 1994 Congress passed the Riegle-Neal Interstate Bank Branching Act that by 1997 allowed unlimited branching across all states.
• June 2006 FDIC Statistics on Banking
• There are 7,479 banks:
• 89 Banks have over $10 billion in assets that hold 67% of total bank deposits
• The remaining 7,389 banks hold 33% of bank deposits
• Commercial Banks Represent the Most Important Source of Credit for Small Business and are also Important to Consumers.
• How Has the Post-deregulation Era Impacted Bank Services in Southeast Missouri?
• The FDIC Publishes an On-Line Summary of Deposits For Metro and Rural Counties.
• http://www2.fdic.gov/sod/index.asp
• Data of interest:
• A) Percentage change in the number of banks per county• B) Percentage change in the number of bank offices (banks +
branches)• C) Percentage change in county deposits
Annual Percent Growth in the Number of Banks 1997-2007
-0.060
-0.040
-0.020
0.000
0.020
0.040
0.060
0.080
0.100
Bollin
ger
Butler
Cape
Gira
rdea
u
Carte
r
Crawfo
rdDen
t
Dunkli
n
Frank
lin
Gas
cona
de Iron
Jeffe
rson
Mad
ison
Miss
issip
pi
New M
adrid
Pemisc
ot
Perry
Reyno
lds
Ripley
Scott
Ste.G
enevie
ve
St. Fr
anco
is
Stodd
ard
Wash
ingt
on
Wayn
e
Miss
ouri
Counties
Annual Percent Growth in Bank Offices 1997-2007
0.000
0.010
0.020
0.030
0.040
0.050
0.060
Bollin
ger
Butler
Cape
Gira
rdea
u
Carte
r
Crawfo
rdDen
t
Dunkli
n
Frank
lin
Gas
cona
de Iron
Jeffe
rson
Mad
ison
Miss
issip
pi
New M
adrid
Pemisc
ot
Perry
Reyno
lds
Ripley
Scott
Ste.G
enevie
ve
St. Fr
anco
is
Stodd
ard
Wash
ingt
on
Wayn
e
Miss
ouri
Counties
Annual Percent Growth in Bank Deposits 1997-2007
0.000
0.010
0.020
0.030
0.040
0.050
0.060
0.070
0.080
Bollin
ger
Butler
Cape
Gira
rdea
u
Carte
r
Crawfo
rdDen
t
Dunkli
n
Frank
lin
Gas
cona
de Iron
Jeffe
rson
Mad
ison
Miss
issip
pi
New M
adrid
Pemisc
ot
Perry
Reyno
lds
Ripley
Scott
Ste.G
enevie
ve
St. Fr
anco
is
Stodd
ard
Wash
ingt
on
Wayn
e
Miss
ouri
Counties
Southeast Missouri Counties Sorted by Bank Deposits in 2007
•
Banking Institutions
Bank Offices Deposits
Missouri 366 2263 96447
Franklin 17 43 1698
Jefferson 18 43 1615
Cape Girardeau 14 33 1282
Scott 9 18 747
St. Francis 7 24 723
Butler 9 20 715
Stoddard 12 25 527
Dunklin 9 15 452
Perry 7 9 371
Ste. Genevieve 5 8 299
Gasconade 7 10 290
Crawford 4 8 272
Pemiscot 4 7 247
New Madrid 8 12 237
Mississippi 3 6 232
Dent 3 6 182
Madison 3 6 153
Ripley 4 6 139
Wayne 3 7 117
Iron 2 6 114
Carter 3 5 88
Bollinger 4 5 84
Reynolds 2 5 71
Factors that most likely influence growth in county bank offices and deposits are:
• A) Growth in county population• B) Growth in county personal income
• The correlation coefficient between percentage change in county personal income and county bank deposits for 1997-2007 is: +.46
• The correlation coefficient between percentage change in county population and county bank deposits for 1997-2007 is: +.19
• Estimated regressions suggest that annual growth in county population and personal income from 1997-2007 influence the growth in county bank offices and deposits.
1) Office Growth = a + b (County population growth) b=.15 t=2.94 R-square=.28
2) Deposit Growth = a + b (Personal Income Growth) b=.92 t=2.49 R-square=.22
3) Office Growth = a + b (Personal Income Growth) b=.67 t=1.85 R-square=.13
Conclusions
• Contrary to the U.S. and Missouri, the twenty-four county region has experienced a net increase of 35 new banking institutions. The net increase in banking offices from 1997-2007 was 79.
• When one considers that Carter, Dunklin, Iron, Mississippi, New Madrid, Pemiscot and Reynolds counties all had population declines from 1997-2005 one must conclude that the Southeast Missouri region has been adequately served by banks during the post regulation era.