ceng 232 l7 - out-of-plane walls

8
L7 Rigi(ty, OutofPlane Walls CENG 232 Winter 2015 1 Wall Rigidity and Out-of-Plane Walls CENG 232 Lecture 7 Shear Wall Rigidity (Text §3.8.2) For buildings with rigid diaphragms, lateral loads are distributed based on relative stiffness of walls Wall rigidity is the shear required to cause a unit deflection of the wall: R = V Δ Shear Wall Rigidity (Text §3.8.2) Deformations are due to: Flexural deformation Shear deformation Foundation rotation or uplift Assuming the shear wall is a deep cantilever beam: Young’s Modulus: Shear Modulus: Δ = VH 3 3E m I + 1.2VH AE v + Δ F 2H L E m = 900 f m E v = 0.4 E m Foundation rotation is usually ignored Shear Wall Rigidity (Text §3.8.2) For distribution of EQ loads, only the relative rigidity is needed. For walls with the same thickness, relative rigidity is: The force resisted by each wall is: R i = 1 4 H L 3 + 3 H L i V i = R i R i i =1 n V

Upload: juan-valle

Post on 02-Oct-2015

14 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

DESCRIPTION

LINEAR ALGEBRA WITHAPPLICATIONSBy BRETSCHER LINEAR ALGEBRA WITH APPLICATIONS EDITION: 5TH 13 PUBLISHER: PEARSON ISBN: 9780321796974spacerSELECT TO SEE PRICINGSPRING QTR 2015AMTH24719969SELECT FORMATspacer

TRANSCRIPT

  • L7 - Rigi(ty, Out-of-Plane Walls

    CENG 232 - Winter 2015 1

    Wall Rigidity and

    Out-of-Plane Walls

    CENG 232 Lecture 7

    Shear Wall Rigidity (Text 3.8.2)

    For buildings with rigid diaphragms, lateral loads are distributed based on relative stiffness of walls

    Wall rigidity is the shear required to cause a unit deflection of the wall:

    R = V

    Shear Wall Rigidity (Text 3.8.2)

    Deformations are due to: Flexural deformation Shear deformation Foundation rotation or uplift

    Assuming the shear wall is a deep cantilever beam:

    Youngs Modulus:

    Shear Modulus:

    =VH 33EmI

    +1.2VHAEv

    + F2HL

    Em = 900 f mEv = 0.4Em

    Foundation rotation is usually ignored

    Shear Wall Rigidity (Text 3.8.2)

    For distribution of EQ loads, only the relative rigidity is needed.

    For walls with the same thickness, relative rigidity is:

    The force resisted by each wall is:

    Ri =1

    4 HL

    3+ 3 HL

    i

    Vi =RiRi

    i=1

    n

    V

  • L7 - Rigi(ty, Out-of-Plane Walls

    CENG 232 - Winter 2015 2

    Shear Wall Rigidity (Text 3.8.2)

    If the top of the wall is restrained from rotation (fixed-fixed):

    For walls with the same thickness, relative rigidity is:

    =VH 312EmI

    +1.2VHAEv

    Ri =1

    HL

    3+ 3 HL

    i Load to each shear wall can be calculated

    based on relative stiffness.

    Determining relative stiffness can be more difficult for walls with openings like this

    The walls of this school have architectural CMU veneer over loadbearing CMU.

  • L7 - Rigi(ty, Out-of-Plane Walls

    CENG 232 - Winter 2015 3

    Varying wall stiffness in a CMU building

    Rigidity of Walls with Openings (Text 3.8.2)

    Modified stiffness for walls with openings:

    wall = solid wall solid strip + piers

    Example 3.8.3: Rigidity of Walls with Openings

    Wall broken into 6 segments

    Relative rigidity found for each

    30 kip force is distributed according to relative rigidity

    Example 3.8.3: Rigidity of Walls with Openings

    Solution:

  • L7 - Rigi(ty, Out-of-Plane Walls

    CENG 232 - Winter 2015 4

    Out-of-Plane Loads on Walls (Text 3.9)

    Shear walls loaded out-of-plane are not part of the lateral-load resisting system, and need only support their own loads.

    Because wall deflections are comparable to the wall thickness, P- effects must be considered.

    Christchurch, New Zealand, 2011. An example of out-of-plane failure of an unreinforced masonry wall.

    Christchurch, New Zealand, 2011. Failure of an reinforced masonry wall.

    Out-of-Plane Loads on Walls (Text 3.9.1)

    Out-of-plane EQ loads different for structural and non-structural walls.

    Structural walls: part of lateral load resisting system

    SDS = design spectral response acceleration in short period range

    I = importance factor

    Wp = weight of wall

    Fp = 0.4SDS I Wp

    Non-structural: see text section 3.9.1 for loads

    Fp min = 0.1 Wp

  • L7 - Rigi(ty, Out-of-Plane Walls

    CENG 232 - Winter 2015 5

    Walls can be designed to span vertically, or horizontally between vertical supports:

    Out-of-Plane Loads on Walls

    Effective wall height for design is based on supports:

    This wall is being braced while under construction to reduce its effective height.

    Out-of-Plane Analysis of Slender Walls (Text 5.5.1)

    Out-of-plane wall design MSJC requirements valid if one of the following is satisfied:

    Pu = factored axial load at location of max moment

    Ag = gross cross-sectional area

    H = effective height of wall

    t = wall thickness

    Pu 0.05 f m Ag0.05 f m Ag < Pu 0.20 f m Ag;

    H t 30

  • L7 - Rigi(ty, Out-of-Plane Walls

    CENG 232 - Winter 2015 6

    Out-of-Plane Analysis of Slender Walls (Text 5.5.1)

    Equations based on pinned-pinned walls. Use equivalent span for non-pinned walls.

    Wall moments due to: Lateral loads (w) Eccentricity of floor loads (Pf) of wall weight x parabolic

    shape deflection (Pw x 2/3)

    (assumes parabolic deflected shape, with top of wall c.g. at 2/3 of )

    Out-of-Plane Analysis of Slender Walls (Text 5.5.1)

    Moment at the middle of the wall is:

    Note that the wall moment is based on the wall deflection (), which is based on the wall moment.

    (an iterative process)

    M = wH2

    8 +Pf e2 + Pf + Pw( )

    Cracked Section Properties:

    Cracked moment:

    Cracked moment of inertia:

    Mcr = Sn fr See Table 1.6.2 for fr

    Icr = nAse d c( )2 +bc33

    n = modular ratio

    Ase =P + As fy

    fy

    Out-of-Plane Analysis: Closed form solution for wall deflection

    (Text 5.5.1)

    Substitute wall moment equation into deflection equation to get closed-form (no iteration) solution for deflection:

    =

    wH 28 +

    Pf e2

    Mcr 1

    IcrIg

    48EmIg5H 2 Pw + Pf( )

    =

    wH 28 +

    Pf e2

    48EmIg5H 2 Pw + Pf( )

    Uncracked: Cracked:

    jvalleHighlight

    jvalleHighlight

    jvalleHighlight

  • L7 - Rigi(ty, Out-of-Plane Walls

    CENG 232 - Winter 2015 7

    Design of Slender Walls (Text 5.5.2)

    After wall displacement and corresponding moment are determined, the section can be designed.

    Design requirements: Out-of-plane moments including P- effects: Horizontal deflection at mid-height under service

    (unfactored) loads, s, must be less than 0.007H.

    Mn Mu

    Design of Slender Walls (Text 5.5.2)

    One layer of reinforcing:

    Mn = As fy + Pu( ) d a2

    a = As fy + Pu0.8 f mb

    Design of Slender Walls (Text 5.5.2)

    Two layers of reinforcing:

    Mn = As fy + Pu( ) d a2

    Pu d

    t2

    a = As fy + Pu0.8 f mb

    Design of Slender Walls: Effective Width

    Maximum width of compression block is the smallest of: 1. Center to center of bar spacing 2. 6t (t = wall thickness) 3. 72 inches

    For partially grouted walls, compression zone cannot include the ungrouted part of the wall. Calculate T-beam shape compression block.

  • L7 - Rigi(ty, Out-of-Plane Walls

    CENG 232 - Winter 2015 8

    Design of Slender Walls: Max Reinforcement

    Strain in the reinforcing steel must be at least 1.5 times the yield strain when the masonry reaches its strain limit.

    (see text 5.5.2 for derivation)

    max =As,maxbd

    max = 0.64 f m

    fy0.0025

    1.5 fy Es + 0.0025

    Pbdfy

    where = 1.5, mu = 0.0025

    Example: Design of Slender Walls