cemex hbr case analysis
DESCRIPTION
Cemex HBR Case analysisTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Cemex HBR Case analysis](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022082201/55cf9cd1550346d033ab291d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
SESSION 2 “The Globalization of Cemex”.MATERIALSCase: HBS 9 701 017 The Globalization of CEMEX‐ ‐Additional material: Exhibits 4 8‐
1. What benefits have CEMEX and the other global competitors in cementderived from globalization?
1. Economies of Scale2. Manufacture closer to point of use to reduce the logistic cost3. Avoid Import tax by producing the local country4. Reduce the risk of political and economic crisis5. Reduce risk of dependency on single market
2. How specifically has CEMEX managed to outperform its leading globalcompetitors in the cement industry? (See exhibits 4 8)‐ .
1. EBIT – 29%, Competitors are between 10-15%2. Maintain healthy cash flow – Ratio – 20%3. Stock Profitability -
3. What accounts for the sequence in which CEMEX entered foreign markets?How do the markets it has entered recently compare with the markets that itentered early on?
1. Trade sanctions in US, major exports market for CEMEX2. Went for portfolio diversification but this didn’t work well. Based on boston consulting
advise they went for regional expansion.
Earlier MarketsUSLATAMEurope
Recent MarketsSE ASIAEgypt
4. What recommendations would you make to CEMEX regarding its
![Page 2: Cemex HBR Case analysis](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022082201/55cf9cd1550346d033ab291d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
globalization strategy going forward? In particular, what kinds of countriesshould it focus its future expansion on?
The cement industry and its players made first steps in the direction to Global integration
only in the 1970s. It could be seen as somewhat paradoxical, because if we apply the matrix
of Global Integration and Local Responsiveness pressures to the cement industry, we can
clearly identify that the industry scores high on most of the factors that should have pushed
it to globalization much earlier.
These factors include large investment intensity, technology intensity in production,
pressures for cost reduction, universal needs, presence of multinational competitors, and
access to localized resources. But that matrix does not take into account the inherent
characteristic of the industry’s principal product, namely low-value-to-weight ratio of
cement.
Therefore, the move from the fragmented localized markets to formation of the MNCs
spanning the globe was caused not by the intrinsic universal need for cement itself or by
the opportunities for labor cost arbitrage, as was common for many other industries. Since
cement itself was, and mostly remains, not an export-driven business, because it was
expensive to transport, there had to be other drivers for globalization of the industry.
Indeed, the emergence of MNCs in the cement industry was caused by significant progress
in the development of the supportive functions underlying the industry as a whole, such as
telecommunications, information technology, capital markets, knowledge management.
Unlike the cement, these functions were much more suitable for “export” and their “value-
to-weight” was very high.
Analysis of the factors of Local Responsiveness shows us that the cement industry
generally does not have high pressures for localizing their product. These pressures are
medium at the most. Even though there can be some noticeable differences in consumer
demands from developed and emerging markets, e.g. bulk vs. bagged cement, these
differences are not affecting significantly, if at all, the product’s characteristics and the
manufacturing process.
Besides, since cement is consumed locally, there is no additional cost of changing
production processes within one plant in order to produce different specifications. Every
plant may have their production processes optimized for local preferences, if necessary.
However, as was demonstrated by the CEMEX experience, the production processes in
general are highly standardized and could be efficiently transferred among multiple plants
within the company.
![Page 3: Cemex HBR Case analysis](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022082201/55cf9cd1550346d033ab291d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The Ghemawat’s approach to modern day globalization focuses on managing the tensions
between the three types of global strategy instead of just adopting one, two or sometimes
all three of those strategies and trying to excel in each of them. Of the three strategies,
Adaptation, Aggregation, and Arbitration, CEMEX has clearly achieved its success by
focusing on Aggregation and effectively managing Adaptation. However, the aggregation in
CEMEX had a significant twist, when the economies of scale were achieved not by simple
centralization of production and development, but rather by efficient management of its
global knowledge base.
The cornerstone of the CEMEX Way corporate philosophy was transfer and standardization
of best practices throughout the company. The remarkable distinction of the company’s
approach was that this knowledge transfer was not a one-way traffic when the best
practices from the home base were exported and bluntly enforced on the new acquisitions.
The company’s executives were able to identify early on and maintain the attitude of
continuous learning and expanding their knowledge base through acquisitions.
The PMI process was aimed not just at introducing the tested processes and practices in
the newly acquired plants, but also at cataloging, analyzing and benchmarking the
practices of these new acquisitions. This approach resulted in 70% of CEMEX’s practices
being adapted from its acquisitions. One of the most notable examples of this learning
attitude was the application of the PMI process to Mexican operations in 1996 after a spree
of foreign acquisitions in Europe and Latin America.
Cemex distributor Puerto Aventuras, Mexico
The success of the company coming from the developing market and becoming one of the
three global giants in the industry is a powerful testimony to the appropriateness of their
corporate philosophy, known as CEMEX way. The continuous learning, allowing the
information to flow freely in both directions between the corporate headquarters and new
acquisitions is a primary reason for the company’s success. CEMEX should stay the course
and continue refining their strategy through reiterative process of learning. This will allow
![Page 4: Cemex HBR Case analysis](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022082201/55cf9cd1550346d033ab291d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
the company to stay relevant and keep its competitive edge in the ever-changing global
economy.