cell phone trial in school ed techconf nim
TRANSCRIPT
Cell phone trial in school
Pinelands High SchoolNicole MasureikTwitter: nimming
Image CC licenced for reuse by JonJon2kB from Flickr
Why cell phones?
• Insufficient access to computer labs• Most kids have one• Can provide 1-on-1 programmes• Cheaper than ipads• Wanted to know whether they could be used
efficiently as a learning tool
Safety and school policy??• Phones handed in at reception before school• Special tags – all in one box• Box collected/ returned by teacher• Parental permission forms• AUPs• Video release forms• Blog is closed to public• Twitter names designed to be non-identifiable
• Outside of these lessons, normal sanctions apply if caught with a phone
How did we choose the classes?
• Two Gd 11 classes (one maths, one LS) • Large overlap between pupils in classes• Top academics in the school
What are we doing?
• Twitter backchannel for questions, h/w, activities (different hash tags for each class)
• Blogging summaries/ solutions/ discussions• Voice recordings• Video recordings• Photo-documenting the lesson• Evernote for note-taking
What have we noticed?• Increased energy in lesson• Greater participation in lesson• Greater collaboration in lesson• More questions being asked• Questions are broader/ wider/ deeper• Lesson format shifting from mainly content
delivery to teaching critical thinking skills• “Flipped” classroom experience
High points?
• Interactive lesson from home using Twitter & blogs by sick teacher
• Creating video summaries of lesson BY pupils FOR pupils
• Having a backchannel for questions!• Pupils have access to teacher after school
hours to ask questions (don’t have to wait till next lesson)
Techniques we’ve implemented
• 2nd projector and laptop for Tweetboard• Twitter host in every lesson• Summariser for every lesson• Twitter apps to analyse tweets e.g. Archivist
Results so far?
• Stats are always misleading…– Small sample size– Short time period of trial
However, LS class appears to have a 4% higher result with phones.
Is that statistically significant? Yes.