ce-451rcc (1)

Upload: lokesh-meghwal

Post on 02-Jun-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    1/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    2/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    3/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    4/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    5/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    6/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    7/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    8/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    9/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    10/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    11/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    12/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    13/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    14/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    15/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    16/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    17/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    18/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    19/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    20/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    21/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    22/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    23/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    24/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    25/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    26/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    27/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    28/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    29/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    30/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    31/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    32/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    33/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    34/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    35/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    36/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    37/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    38/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    39/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    40/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    41/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    42/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    43/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    44/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    45/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    46/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    47/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    48/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    49/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    50/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    51/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    52/86

    (at support) and 50% at mid-span!

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    53/86

    Moment at C = -9.43 kNm

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    54/86

    Pattern loading

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    55/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    56/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    57/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    58/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    59/86

    Influence lines and gravity load patterns for a continuous beam

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    60/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    61/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    62/86

    Width of a beam shall be less than or equal to the dimension of the column into which

    they frame

    Beam widths of 200 mm, 250 mm and 300 mm are commonly used. Beam widths of

    230 mm are also commonly used in India so that the infill masonry wall resting on a

    beam is flush with it

    The ratio of overall depth, D, to the width, b, in rectangular beam sections lied in the

    range 1.52. For beams carrying very heavy loads it may be even 3 or more!

    For simply supported beams, span/overall depth 10

    For continuous beams, span/overall depth 12 to 15

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    63/86

    In framed structures, the maximum amount of tension reinforcement in a beam is usually

    restricted to 1.4% to 1.5%. This generally corresponds to a Mu/bd2of about 4 to 4.5. Such

    values of Mu/bd2 will result in a doubly reinforced section. In general, it is desirable to

    design beams with a tension steel content of 0.5 to 0.8 times pt,lim

    For simply supported slabs, effective depth span/25

    For continuous slabs, effective depth span/32

    Amount of tension reinforcement in a slab 0.3% - 0.4%

    Column dimensions should not be smaller than the size of the largest beam framing into

    the column. Estimate the size very roughly by equally dividing the total gravity load

    amongst all columns and dividing this load with the allowable axial stress for the concrete

    grade in the column

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    64/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    65/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    66/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    67/86

    Loads

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    68/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    69/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    70/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    71/86

    Approximate analysis for vertical loadssubstitute frame method

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    72/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    73/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    74/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    75/86

    Column moments from frame analysis

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    76/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    77/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    78/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    79/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    80/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    81/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    82/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    83/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    84/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    85/86

  • 8/11/2019 CE-451RCC (1)

    86/86