cash management the price of single payments · cash managementpayment solutions the price of...

2
SEPTEMBER 2004 THE TREASURER 23 cash management PAYMENT SOLUTIONS THE PRICE OF SINGLE PAYMENTS NEW PAYMENT SOLUTIONS ARE BEING DEVELOPED TO MEET EU CROSS-BORDER SETTLEMENT NEEDS, BUT EVERY ONE WILL BRING ITS COSTS WHEN IT COMES TO MARKET-WIDE ADOPTION. COLIN DIGBY REPORTS. T he 12 existing euro ‘in’ countries currently operate in excess of 30 clearing systems, each with distinctive clearing practices, different structures, processes, formats, account numbers and bank codes. The harmonisation and consolidation of this environment continues to be a central challenge for consumers, corporates and banks alike. The processing of euro payments within this environment remains particularly challenging and the recent advent of cross-border payments regulation and new payment standards, including the introduction of International Bank Account Numbers (IBANs), is perversely adding a further layer of complexity, rather than facilitating the intended reduction in complexity and costs. On May 1 this year, 10 new accession countries joined the existing 15 member states of the European Union (EU). The enlarged EU, with all 25 countries, operates in excess of 50 clearing systems and as a result, the creation of a truly efficient infrastructure to support the European financial market has now become an even bigger task to tackle. On the upside, it is anticipated that in some instances these accession countries may even have the ability to leapfrog the legacy challenges of their more established Western European counterparts, as they invest in new technology and systems that may not have existed at all in their markets. Today’s risks, high costs and inefficiencies arose partly because cross-border clearance and settlement still takes place on a market- by-market, country-by-country basis. National regulations, systems and market practices need to be replaced by an enhanced, more efficient infrastructure that is interoperable across the whole of Europe. Whilst being created, and indeed once completed, this changing environment will have a material impact on the way in which corporates manage their payments and underlying liquidity. The banks have the task of creating a Single Euro Payment Area (SEPA). This, in effect, is the creation of a pan-European payments architecture to support the needs of the EU’s 450 million consumers more efficiently and at a lower cost. The key pan-European infrastructures currently under development are Euro Banking Association Step 2 – a pan-European Automated Clearing House (PE-ACH) system; PE-DD – a pan- European Direct Debit system and Trans-European Real-Time Gross Settlement Express Transfer (TARGET). Each of these have challenges to overcome before they are fully embraced by the market as a whole. In terms of short-term efficiency, the creation of this new payments infrastructure is hardly the uncovering of the Holy Grail. There are many efficient clearing systems still operating at a country level and there has to be a process of evolution, in terms of these systems either becoming obsolete or maturing into pan-European solutions. Some of them will no doubt have aspirations to evolve into something bigger. Those with a more dynamic commercial approach, open accessibility and the ability to adapt rapidly to the new environment, will no doubt evolve and prove to be worthy adversaries to the new de facto systems. It is hoped the development of any competing infrastructures does not add a further layer of complexity. It should ensure an efficient market in terms of healthy competition, but should not detract from the need to create an efficient and ‘standardised’ payments market. Some of the new infrastructures will initially ‘piggy-back’ on the existing in-country equivalent payment systems. For example, EBA Step 2 will rely on the underlying low-value clearing systems in each member country to provide the underlying clearing. In effect, this will initially be a network that sits across the top of the existing ACH systems. This is workable, but may not be the best solution. The alternative would be the immediate replacement of infrastructures and this would require billions of dollars to be spent. A positive and immediate impact of an expanded EU is to bring more countries under the umbrella of a common set of standards and rules. This will not create a single region (from a cash management perspective), but it does facilitate a movement by corporates to concentrate more of their financial processing into a single centre, bringing more discipline to the treasury management and payables and receivables functions (see Getting a fair share, page 32). It will also facilitate more efficient liquidity management solutions as the underlying cash is brought under this greater control ‘HIGH COSTS AND INEFFICIENCIES AROSE BECAUSE CROSS-BORDER CLEARANCE AND SETTLEMENT STILL TAKES PLACE ON A MARKET-TO- MARKET AND COUNTRY-TO- COUNTRY BASIS’

Upload: others

Post on 07-Oct-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: cash management THE PRICE OF SINGLE PAYMENTS · cash managementPAYMENT SOLUTIONS THE PRICE OF SINGLE PAYMENTS NEW PAYMENT SOLUTIONS ARE BEING DEVELOPED TO MEET EU CROSS-BORDER SETTLEMENT

SEPTEMBER 2004 THE TREASURER 23

cash management PAYMENT SOLUTIONS

THE PRICE OFSINGLE PAYMENTSNEW PAYMENT SOLUTIONS ARE BEING DEVELOPED TO MEET EU CROSS-BORDER SETTLEMENT NEEDS, BUT EVERY ONE WILLBRING ITS COSTS WHEN IT COMES TO MARKET-WIDE ADOPTION.COLIN DIGBY REPORTS.

The 12 existing euro ‘in’ countries currently operate inexcess of 30 clearing systems, each with distinctive clearingpractices, different structures, processes, formats, accountnumbers and bank codes. The harmonisation and

consolidation of this environment continues to be a centralchallenge for consumers, corporates and banks alike. The processingof euro payments within this environment remains particularlychallenging and the recent advent of cross-border paymentsregulation and new payment standards, including the introductionof International Bank Account Numbers (IBANs), is perverselyadding a further layer of complexity, rather than facilitating theintended reduction in complexity and costs.

On May 1 this year, 10 new accession countries joined theexisting 15 member states of the European Union (EU). Theenlarged EU, with all 25 countries, operates in excess of 50 clearingsystems and as a result, the creation of a truly efficientinfrastructure to support the European financial market has nowbecome an even bigger task to tackle.

On the upside, it is anticipated that in some instances theseaccession countries may even have the ability to leapfrog thelegacy challenges of their more established Western Europeancounterparts, as they invest in new technology and systems thatmay not have existed at all in their markets.

Today’s risks, high costs and inefficiencies arose partly becausecross-border clearance and settlement still takes place on a market-by-market, country-by-country basis. National regulations, systemsand market practices need to be replaced by an enhanced, moreefficient infrastructure that is interoperable across the whole ofEurope. Whilst being created, and indeed once completed, thischanging environment will have a material impact on the way inwhich corporates manage their payments and underlying liquidity.

The banks have the task of creating a Single Euro Payment Area(SEPA). This, in effect, is the creation of a pan-European paymentsarchitecture to support the needs of the EU’s 450 millionconsumers more efficiently and at a lower cost.

The key pan-European infrastructures currently underdevelopment are Euro Banking Association Step 2 – a pan-EuropeanAutomated Clearing House (PE-ACH) system; PE-DD – a pan-European Direct Debit system and Trans-European Real-Time GrossSettlement Express Transfer (TARGET). Each of these have challengesto overcome before they are fully embraced by the market as awhole.

In terms of short-term efficiency, the creation of this newpayments infrastructure is hardly the uncovering of the Holy Grail.There are many efficient clearing systems still operating at a countrylevel and there has to be a process of evolution, in terms of thesesystems either becoming obsolete or maturing into pan-Europeansolutions. Some of them will no doubt have aspirations to evolveinto something bigger. Those with a more dynamic commercialapproach, open accessibility and the ability to adapt rapidly to thenew environment, will no doubt evolve and prove to be worthyadversaries to the new de facto systems. It is hoped the developmentof any competing infrastructures does not add a further layer ofcomplexity. It should ensure an efficient market in terms of healthycompetition, but should not detract from the need to create anefficient and ‘standardised’ payments market.

Some of the new infrastructures will initially ‘piggy-back’ on theexisting in-country equivalent payment systems. For example, EBAStep 2 will rely on the underlying low-value clearing systems in eachmember country to provide the underlying clearing. In effect, this willinitially be a network that sits across the top of the existing ACHsystems. This is workable, but may not be the best solution. Thealternative would be the immediate replacement of infrastructuresand this would require billions of dollars to be spent.

A positive and immediate impact of an expanded EU is to bringmore countries under the umbrella of a common set of standardsand rules. This will not create a single region (from a cashmanagement perspective), but it does facilitate a movement bycorporates to concentrate more of their financial processing into asingle centre, bringing more discipline to the treasury managementand payables and receivables functions (see Getting a fair share,page 32). It will also facilitate more efficient liquidity managementsolutions as the underlying cash is brought under this greater control

‘HIGH COSTS AND INEFFICIENCIESAROSE BECAUSE CROSS-BORDERCLEARANCE AND SETTLEMENT STILLTAKES PLACE ON A MARKET-TO-MARKET AND COUNTRY-TO-COUNTRY BASIS’

Page 2: cash management THE PRICE OF SINGLE PAYMENTS · cash managementPAYMENT SOLUTIONS THE PRICE OF SINGLE PAYMENTS NEW PAYMENT SOLUTIONS ARE BEING DEVELOPED TO MEET EU CROSS-BORDER SETTLEMENT

and discipline. Corporates may retain their existing centres to handlean expanded Europe, or consider the attractiveness of relocatingcentralised pan-European services into one of the accession countries.A number of multi-national corporations have already set-up SharedService Centres (SSCs) in Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic andother countries in Central Europe.

The commitment by the 10 accession countries to adopt the euroas their local currency over the next few years will naturally extenduse of the euro for cross-border settlements. This is in addition to thenatural growth we are already seeing in the euro as a reserve andsettlement currency globally. Furthermore, the recent EU cross-borderpayments regulation provides for more certainty, clarity aroundcharges and value dating and lower transaction costs for cross-bordereuro payments within the EU (see Evolution of the euro, page 43). Thiswill also act as a driver to further euro adoption. For pan-Europeancorporates, all these factors increase the value proposition of updatingpayment and reconciliation systems to be truly ‘euro-compliant’, andyield the significant benefits on offer. A good banking partner should

be able to provide the help and guidance needed by its clients tostrike the right balance between efficient straight-through processing(STP) of payments and investment in system upgrades.

Another impact of the expanding Europe, which is worthconsidering, is that it provides additional impetus to adopt a widerEuropean perspective to the corporate cash management model, and,as a result, the global view. Whilst upgrading processes and systemsto leverage the euro, consideration should be given to the rest of theregion as well. Central and Eastern Europe and the Nordic region aresometimes left in isolation, creating additional process andmanagement challenges, as well as leaving inefficient liquiditypockets outside the main arena.

The pragmatic treasury or cash manager will ultimately want thebest results for the least cost and resource dedication. In reality thismeans prioritising countries according to their importance to thecorporation’s business as well as their ‘cash management friendliness’,or the lack of it as the case may be! They should expect help andguidance from providers of banking services and technology solutions,but need to ensure that any enhancements are generic enough tomeet long-term goals as well as immediate objectives. Solutions fortoday may not be worth the investment if there is a high risk ofobsolescence.

Colin Digby, Strategy and Solutions, EMEA Product Management,JPMorgan Treasury [email protected]/ts

‘THE COMMITMENT BY THE 10ACCESSION COUNTRIES TO ADOPTTHE EURO WILL EXTEND USE OF THEEURO FOR CROSS-BORDERSETTLEMENTS’

cash management PAYMENT SOLUTIONS

here’s why

DEPTH – gtnews meets the information needs of the global treasury community with an archive of over 1,500 specialist articles, plus guides, directories and forums

QUALITY – gtnews contributors are experts & practitioners from leading corpora-tions, banks, consultants, technology vendors and specialist publications

FREQUENCY – gtnews is updated weekly with new material keeping readers in touchwith the latest thinking & industry trends

99of our readers said they would recom-mend gtnews to a colleague

%

If you are in the treasury, payments and cash management business why not become a gtnews reader?

Register free at www.gtnews.com