case: using remote monitoring data for condition-based maintenance geert-jan van houtum prof. of...

8
Case: Using remote monitoring data for condition-based maintenance Geert-Jan van Houtum Prof. of Reliability and Maintenance SCTL workshop, Helsinki, 8 July 2014

Upload: roderick-carter

Post on 21-Jan-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Case: Using remote monitoring data for condition-based maintenance Geert-Jan van Houtum Prof. of Reliability and Maintenance SCTL workshop, Helsinki, 8

Case: Using remote monitoring data for condition-based

maintenance

Geert-Jan van HoutumProf. of Reliability and Maintenance

SCTL workshop, Helsinki, 8 July 2014

Page 2: Case: Using remote monitoring data for condition-based maintenance Geert-Jan van Houtum Prof. of Reliability and Maintenance SCTL workshop, Helsinki, 8

PAGE 28-Sept-2013/ School of Industrial Engineering

Case company: ASML

• Produces lithography machines for semiconductor industry

• All new machines are under service contracts with system availability constraints

• High targets for system availability (because of high downtime costs for semiconductor factories)

Page 3: Case: Using remote monitoring data for condition-based maintenance Geert-Jan van Houtum Prof. of Reliability and Maintenance SCTL workshop, Helsinki, 8

/ School of Industrial Engineering PAGE 38-Sept-2013

Service Network

Supply spare parts

Central Stockpoint

LocalStockpoint

Customers with contracts

Reg. repl.:1-2 weeks

Emergency Shipm.: 1-2 days

Reg. repl.:1-2 weeks

LocalStockpoint

Lateral Shipments: A few hours

Customers with contracts

Direct sales

Central level:Collection of many parameters

Page 4: Case: Using remote monitoring data for condition-based maintenance Geert-Jan van Houtum Prof. of Reliability and Maintenance SCTL workshop, Helsinki, 8

/ School of Industrial Engineering PAGE 48-Sept-2013

Monitoring data

• Condition data: parameters which are directly or indirectly related with the health state of Module X

• Failure data: failure time

Sample Data: Collected at central level, for one critical unit

MACHINE NUMBER

TIME STAMP VALUE

MACHINE TYPE

SITE ID

CUSTOMER CONTINENT

CUSTOMER COUNTRY

CUSTOMER NUMBER

PARAM ID

M1297 17-Dec-09 -8.856 T0010 1288 Asia South Korea 188 3756M2572 22-Oct-09 -8.9597 T0005 665 Asia Singapore 2046 990M2488 30-Jul-09 -3.9977 T0083 755 Other Other OT01 981

M0822 14-Jul-09 -4.0141 T0016 1284 Asia South Korea 188 960

M1621 08-May-09 -3.8854 T0010 1294 Asia South Korea 1146 957

M1647 23-Oct-09 -3.9167 T0001 277North America USA 196 966

M0003 21-Jul-09 -3.873 T0010 1291 Asia South Korea 188 990

M0004 21-Feb-09 -3.8264 T0010 1291 Asia South Korea 188 966M2862 27-Aug-09 -3.7398 T0004 629 Asia Taiwan 222 993M2631 06-Jan-09 -8.551 T0004 801 Europe France 192 972

M1141 10-Aug-09 -6.8885 T0011 1290 Asia South Korea 1146 966M3241 22-Apr-09 -8.551 T0010 629 Asia Taiwan 222 963M0051 05-Sep-09 -8.9597 T0008 1178 Asia Taiwan 386 996M1171 28-Feb-09 -3.9977 T0006 629 Asia Taiwan 222 987M1171 12-Aug-09 -6.8885 T0006 629 Asia Taiwan 222 990

M1614 04-Dec-09 -8.551 T0007 1284 Asia South Korea 188 990

M1951 16-Jul-09 -8.9597 T0019 1286 Asia South Korea 188 960

M2785 05-Jul-09 -3.9977 T0010 1291 Asia South Korea 188 996

Page 5: Case: Using remote monitoring data for condition-based maintenance Geert-Jan van Houtum Prof. of Reliability and Maintenance SCTL workshop, Helsinki, 8

Aligned data

MACHINE NUMBER

TIMESTAMPMACHINE

TYPECUSTOMER

IDP955 P956 P957 P958 P959 P960 P961

M0005 07-Jan-09 T0007 C1058 -6.8961 -6.8860 -6.8910 -6.9177 -6.8542 -6.8860 -3.7979

M0005 13-Feb-09 T0007 C1058 -7.3892 -7.3831 -7.3862 -7.4487 -7.3123 -7.3805 -4.3121

M0005 16-Feb-09 T0007 C1058 -7.4847 -7.4738 -7.4792 -7.5021 -7.4451 -7.4736 -4.3567

M0005 17-Feb-09 T0007 C1058 -7.5400 -7.5320 -7.5360 -7.5974 -7.4640 -7.5307 -4.3823

M0005 19-Feb-09 T0007 C1058 -7.5305 -7.5201 -7.5253 -7.5479 -7.4915 -7.5197 -4.3793

M0005 01-Mar-09 T0007 C1058 -7.6871 -7.6767 -7.6819 -7.7032 -7.6489 -7.6761 -4.5276

M0005 07-Mar-09 T0007 C1058 -7.7783 -7.7686 -7.7734 -7.7954 -7.7414 -7.7684 -4.6072

M0005 10-Mar-09 T0007 C1058 -7.7222 -7.7109 -7.7165 -7.7396 -7.6819 -7.7107 -4.6219

M0005 06-Apr-09 T0007 C1058 -8.0890 -8.0804 -8.0847 -8.1049 -8.0527 -8.0788 -4.9698

M0006 06-Apr-09 T0007 C1058 -7.9700 -7.9602 -7.9651 -7.9858 -7.9337 -7.9597 -4.9725

M0006 22-Apr-09 T0007 C1058 -8.1674 -8.1635 -8.1654 -8.2214 -8.0994 -8.1604 -5.1675

M0006 01-Jun-09 T0007 C1058 -8.5568 -8.5504 -8.5536 -8.5730 -8.5239 -8.5484 -5.6113

M0006 09-Jun-09 T0007 C1058 -8.5599 -8.5553 -8.5576 -8.6090 -8.4949 -8.5519 -5.6860

M0006 22-Jul-09 T0007 C1058 -8.7384 -8.7350 -8.7367 -8.7869 -8.6755 -8.7312 -6.2033

M0006 24-Jul-09 T0007 C1058 -8.8330 -8.8257 -8.8293 -8.8461 -8.8004 -8.8232 -6.1697

M0006 14-Aug-09 T0007 C1058 -8.9163 -8.9142 -8.9153 -8.9639 -8.8553 -8.9096 -6.3815

M0006 14-Aug-09 T0007 C1058 -8.9392 -8.9371 -8.9381 -8.9871 -8.8776 -8.9323 -6.3531

M0006 16-Aug-09 T0007 C1058 -8.8599 -8.8574 -8.8586 -8.9078 -8.7988 -8.8533 -6.4169

8-Sept-2013/ School of Industrial Engineering PAGE 5

Page 6: Case: Using remote monitoring data for condition-based maintenance Geert-Jan van Houtum Prof. of Reliability and Maintenance SCTL workshop, Helsinki, 8

Coupling with failure data

Failure Instant

STRONG CORRELATION BETWEEN FAILURE AND CONDITION DATA

8-Sept-2013/ School of Industrial Engineering PAGE 6

Page 7: Case: Using remote monitoring data for condition-based maintenance Geert-Jan van Houtum Prof. of Reliability and Maintenance SCTL workshop, Helsinki, 8

/ School of Industrial Engineering PAGE 78-Sept-2013

• A prediction method has been developed that predicts 70% of the failures

• No false predictions• Timing of the failure can be predicted a few

weeks in advance. • Method outperformed the prediction model

based on physical behavior

Results

Page 8: Case: Using remote monitoring data for condition-based maintenance Geert-Jan van Houtum Prof. of Reliability and Maintenance SCTL workshop, Helsinki, 8

/ School of Industrial Engineering PAGE 88-Sept-2013

• Improvement of the physical model• Development of prediction models for other

components• Possible use of the predictions for maintenance

optimization• Pure statistical predictions may be used for spare

parts supply

Barrier: Many departments involved!

Next steps