case study on block foundation productivity

Upload: ojo-a-emmanuel

Post on 05-Apr-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 Case Study on Block Foundation Productivity

    1/20

    CHAPTER 0NE

    INTRODUCTION

    A foundation (also called a ground sill) is a structure that transfer loads to

    the earth. The footing plays a specific load- bearing roles in as much as they

    support the weight of the building. Whether the building rest on post or walls

    which in turn rest on the footing. In planning footings be sure to consider the

    types of soil in which they will be poured (clay, marshy etc.) At the very

    least, footing must be poured below the frost line.

    Foundations are generally broken into two categories; shallow foundationand deep foundation.

    Shallow foundation is, usually, embedded a meter or so into soil. One

    common type is the spread footing which consist of strip or pad of concrete

    (or other material) which extends below the frost line and transfer the weight

    from wall and columns to the soil or bedrock. Another common type is the

    slab-on-grade foundation where the weight of the building is transferred to

    the soil through a concrete slab place at the surface.

    Deep foundation is used to transfer a load from a structure through an upper

    weak layer of soil to a stronger deeper layer of soil. There are different types

    of deep foundations including helical piles, impacts, caissons, pier, and earth

    stabilized columns. The naming conventions for different types of

    foundations vary between different engineers. Historically, piles were wood,

    later steel, reinforced concrete, and pre-tensioned concrete.

  • 7/31/2019 Case Study on Block Foundation Productivity

    2/20

    PURPOSE OF STUDY

    AIM

    The primary aim of this study is to produce the working activities,time and cost of the foundation of a given house plan.

    OBJECTIVES

    To identify the approach to foundation production.To determine suitable time it takes to excavate foundation trenches

    To determine the cost it take to excavate the foundation trench

    STATEMENT OF PROBLEMSThis case-study is design to know appropriate / correct procedure to

    follow in the undertaking of any substructure

    SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY

    This study will help the reader to understand a way to forecastfoundation production activities, that is involved in any given house

    plan. Also the considerations to put in place as to the difficulties that

    may be encountered.

  • 7/31/2019 Case Study on Block Foundation Productivity

    3/20

    METHODOLOGY

    The following procedure among other things has been the method that

    will be employed to carry out this study:

    Site clearance and setting out of the house plane Excavation of the trench and pouring of concrete footings Laying of foundation block wall and backfilling. Setting the formwork, filling hardcore and over site concrete

    SCOPE AND LIMITATION

    The study focuses only on the assessment of foundation activities of

    the two bedroom bungalow plan. It determines the time and cost

    involved in the sub-structure.

  • 7/31/2019 Case Study on Block Foundation Productivity

    4/20

    CHAPTER TWO

    LITERATUE REVIEWFoundation is the most essential part of structure of any

    building. The concrete footing most rest on firm soil

    and extend below frost line. Build footing on lightly

    moist soil (be sure that soil is not wet). National and

    local building codes indicate footing depth; ask your

    local building department.

    Flat surface footing is used when the foundation wall is madeof concrete block or cast concrete. It is possible to make a

    grove in the footing to hold the foundation concrete. Just

    insert the edge of a 2x4 on top of the footing and remove as

    the concrete has hardened.

    Pier foundation(12diam) is used as foundation or footing orfooting without any other support. They are evenly spread

    around the building perimeter according to the local building

    codes. Dig a hole to install the sonotube and fill with

    concrete.

    Excavation and formworkExcavation; place stakes to indicate footing area. Removing

    line from batter boards. Keep the area free from debris and

    dirt.

    Formwork; headed nail are easier to remove than ordinary

    nails. Nail them into the stakes down to the formwork. Oil

    formwork surface touching concrete with waste crank-case

    oil.

  • 7/31/2019 Case Study on Block Foundation Productivity

    5/20

    Foundation tiesmetal or plastic wires that hold thefoundation panels and rebar in place while concrete is being

    poured.

    Gradeground level or elevation at any given point.Excavation or buildings foundation. Correct grading cause

    water to drain away from the buildings foundation.

    Causes of foundation failureMany houses are constructed with foundations that are

    inadequate for the soil condition existing on the site. Because

    of the lack of suitable land, houses are often built on marginalland that has insufficient bearing capacity to support the

    substantial weight of a structure. In addition, there are many

    areas of the country where the near surface soils consist

    predominantly of expansive clay that shrink and swell as their

    moisture content changes. If the bearing soil consist of

    expansive clay, foundation movement can occur uniformly

    across the entire slab. Any of the following can cause

    moisture in the soil to fluctuate vegetation (roots), poor

    drainage, plumbing leaks, evaporation, and wet/dry rain

    cycles.

    Slab-on-grade foundation depends upon the upper-most soil

    layers to provide sufficient bearing capacity to support the

    structure and keep the foundation stable. If the bearing soil

    was insufficiently compacted prior to construction, thefoundation is subject to settlement as the supporting soil

    consolidates.

    Symptoms of foundation failureThe sign of foundation failure do not become obvious until

    after there are serious problems with the foundation. The most

    obvious sign will be door that do not close properly anymore,

  • 7/31/2019 Case Study on Block Foundation Productivity

    6/20

    windows that stick and diagnosis crack in the interior and

    exterior wall. Less obvious symptoms are small cracks in the

    foundation or floor and uneven floors. Sixty percent of all

    houses built on expansive soils suffer from foundationdistress. The problem occurs when only part of the foundation

    leans or settles, causing cracks and other damage. This

    differential movement is largely caused by differences in soil

    moisture. Loss or gain of soil moisture can cause serious

    shrinkage or swelling.

  • 7/31/2019 Case Study on Block Foundation Productivity

    7/20

    CHAPTER THREE

    METHODOLOGYThis aspect of the work will describe the complete activities

    that are to be undergone. The house plane is shown below.

    The production activity will include the time and cost.

    TAKE OFF SHEET

    SUB-STRUCTERE ACTIVITIES

    1. Site clearance2. Setting out3. Excavation of trench4. Foundation concrete footing5. Foundation block work6. Backfilling & compaction7. Hardcore filling8. Formwork9. Over site concrete

    1. Site clearance

    Removal of top soil not exceeding 300mm deep and cart away with trust

    from site.

    Length - 11.87Add - 3.00 14.87 x 14.24 = 212.5m

    2

    14.87

    Width - 11.24

    Add - 3.00

    14.24

  • 7/31/2019 Case Study on Block Foundation Productivity

    8/20

    2. Setting out

    External girth - 46.2m2

    Internal (horizontal) - 20.08m2

    Internal (vertical) - 20.70m2

    Total - 86.98m2

    3. Excavation of trench

    Girth

    External girth - 2 x 11.9 = 23.8m

    2 x 11.2 = 22.4m

    46.2m

    Internal girth - 20.08m

    Vertical - 20.70m

    Total girth - 46.2m

    23.8m

    + 22.4m

    86.98

    Length - 86.98m

    Width of trench - 0.68m 53.23m3

    Depth of trench - 0.90m

  • 7/31/2019 Case Study on Block Foundation Productivity

    9/20

    4. Foundation footing

    0.68

    0.90

    0.15

    Length - 86.98m

    Width - 0.68m 8.87m3

    Depth - 0.15m

    5. Foundation block work

    0.90 0.75

    0.15

    0.68

    Length of block- 85.98m

    Height of block - 0.75m65.24m

    2

  • 7/31/2019 Case Study on Block Foundation Productivity

    10/20

    6. Back filling

    0.30m

    0.68

    Length -11.90m

    Width - 11.20m 39.98m3

    Depth of backfilling - 0.30m

    7. Hard core

    0.30

    0.30

    0.68m

    Length -11.90m

    Width - 11.20m 39.98m3

    Depth of hard core - 0.30m

    Earth filling

    Hard core

    Earth fill

  • 7/31/2019 Case Study on Block Foundation Productivity

    11/20

    8. Form work

    Sawn timber plank to both side of the top.

    2 x 11.90 =23.8m

    2 x 11.20 =22.4m

    46.2m

    Length of timber plank = 46.2m

    Width of timber plank = 0.25m

    9. over site concrete

    Concrete of 1:2:4 -20mm aggregate well compacted, place to avoid

    segrement of concrete

    0.15m

    0.30m

    0.30m

    0.15

    Length -11.90m

    Width - 11.20m 19.9m3

    Depth of concrete0.15m

    Hard core

    Earth filing

    11.55m2

  • 7/31/2019 Case Study on Block Foundation Productivity

    12/20

    WORK FORCE AND TIME

    Site clearance

    From table, Grader capacity 10,000m

    2

    /day

    Site area to clear = 212.5m2

    Therefore, 1day is required (1 operator, 1 banks man)

    Setting out

    Requires 1 day (1 engineer, 1 labour)

    Excavation of trench

    Maximum depth not exceeding 0.9m, requires 2.20hr/labour/m2

    Therefore, 53.23m3

    x 2.20hr/labour/m2

    = 117.10hr

    Work hour of labour/day = 8hr

    1178 =14.63, approximately15 days for one unskilled labour.

    155 = 3, 5 unskilled labour will excavate trench for 3 days

    Foundation footing

    Foundation concrete footing of 150-300 thick, requires 4.30hr/m2for

    1 unskilled labour.

    8.87m3

    x 4.30hr/m2

    =38.14hr

    Work hour of labour/day = 8hr

    38.148 = 4.76, approximately 5days for one mason and 1 unskilled

    labour.

    2 labourers, 2 masons will complete concrete footing in 2 days.

  • 7/31/2019 Case Study on Block Foundation Productivity

    13/20

    Foundation block work

    230mm hollow sandcrete block joint with mortar of 1:3 requires

    1mason and 1labour for 10m2of block/day.

    Total area of block work = 65.24m2

    65.2410 = 6.52, approximately 6 days for 1 mason and 1 labour

    62 =3, 2 mason and 2 labourers will complete block work for 3 days

    Back fillings

    Required 1.5hr/m

    3

    39.98m

    3x 1.50 =59.97hr

    8hr required/day for 1 labour

    59.978 =7.49, approximately 8 days for 1 labour

    84 =2, 4 labourers will complete back filling for 2days

    Hard core

    Ditto

    Form work

    0.45hr/m2

    11.55m2

    x 0.45hr = 5.1975hrs

    Work hour of labour/day = 8hr

    Requires 1 carpenter and 1labour to complete form work

    Over site concrete

    2.50hr/m3

  • 7/31/2019 Case Study on Block Foundation Productivity

    14/20

  • 7/31/2019 Case Study on Block Foundation Productivity

    15/20

    FOUNDATION PRODUCTION ACTIVITES TABLE

    Task name Area(m

    2)

    Volume(m

    3)

    Hours ofwork (hr)

    Requiresday of wk

    Cost(N)

    Site

    clearance 212 3 1 25,000

    Setting out

    59.5 4 1 1000

    Excavation

    of trench 53.2 117 3 15000

    foundation

    footing 8.87 38 2

    10000

    Foundation

    block work 65.2 52 3 15000

    Back filling

    &

    compaction

    39.98 59 2 8000

    Hard core 39.98 60 2 8000

    Form work 11.55 5 1 2500

    Over site

    concrete 199 50 1 9000

    Total 16 days 73,500

  • 7/31/2019 Case Study on Block Foundation Productivity

    16/20

  • 7/31/2019 Case Study on Block Foundation Productivity

    17/20

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    Numberofdays

    Task Name

    Graph of Task against Number of days

  • 7/31/2019 Case Study on Block Foundation Productivity

    18/20

    0

    5,000

    10,000

    15,000

    20,000

    25,000

    30,000

    Cost(Naira)

    Task name

    Graph of Cost against Task

  • 7/31/2019 Case Study on Block Foundation Productivity

    19/20

    CHAPTER FOUR

    SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

    From the research findings, it can be deduced that the use of glass building is

    quite economical provided aesthetics is also considered.

    REFERENCE

    Adeshoga, I. E (2002) glass as a structural material, Longman Lagos

    Mechanical properties glass by R K Brow

    Horst Scholze: "Glass - Nature, Structure, and Properties"; Springer, 1991, ISBN

    0-387-97396-6

    Steve W. Martin, Ph.D., Professor of Materials Science and Engineering,

    Iowa State University.

    R. W. Douglas: A history of glassmaking, G T Foulis & Co Ltd, Henley-

    on-Thames, 1972, ISBN 0854291172

    BY OJO EMMANUEL

    www.design&builtConsult.com

    www.design-n-builtConsult.com

    http://www.design%26builtconsult.com/http://www.design%26builtconsult.com/http://www.design-n-builtconsult.com/http://www.design-n-builtconsult.com/http://www.design-n-builtconsult.com/http://www.design%26builtconsult.com/
  • 7/31/2019 Case Study on Block Foundation Productivity

    20/20