case study for improving disaster resiliency of …...establishing of business continuity standard...
TRANSCRIPT
Case Study for Improving Disaster Resiliency of
Electric Power Distribution Network In
Philippines
2017
資料6
1
The study on the incentive mechanism for improving disaster resiliency of electric power distribution network
出典: フィリピン国電力化庁 (NEA)
The Philippines is the 2nd most disaster-prone country per World Risk Report An average for 20 tropical storms or typhoons impact the Philippines each year Typhoon Yolanda left the devastating damage to the Visayas region Total damage to the electricity sector was estimated at PhP 6,830 million , of which, the distribution section accounts for PhP 5,200 million
Improvement of resiliency of the distribution sector is critical in disaster reduction while it requires substantial investment
Establishing of Business Continuity Standard for power distribution system shall mitigate disaster damage and lead to a faster recovery. 3
1. Identify Threats and Risk 2. Upgrade Structure Design of Infrastructure 3. Funding Build Back Better 4. Other Measurements (Warning, community awareness, capacity training, restoring manual)
Source: Department Public Works and Highways(DPWH)
Disaster Resiliency Program for DRRM DRRM: Disaster Risk Reduction Mgt.
“Investment for resiliency & risk reduction will save 5-7 times in
reconstruction and rehabilitation”
4
A Rating System for
Business Continuity Management
An assessment tool on “Preparedness for Natural Hazards” for Electric Distribution System that provides an overall view on the preparedness along with Strong points and areas needing improvement.
Rating should be designed to allow financial institutes to decide if the facility is entitled to preferred financial scheme.
5
Disaster 100%
Time
Electric Supplying
Prompt Recovery Work
Damage
Reduction
Management
Control
in BCM
Faster
Restoration
Key Elements in Business Continuity Management for Electric Distribution Service
6
1) Well Designed Facility for Natural hazard
2) Protection against Secondary Damage
3) Power Distribution Loop and Isolation
4) Additional Protection for Important
Facility
Damage
Reduction
Faster
Restoration
Management
Control
in BCM
1) System Hardening Plan
2) Emergency Response Plan
1) Forecast Power Outage Area
2) Restoration Capability
3) Conditions to Restoration Work
4) Mutual Aid System
Note: Rating indicators are further breakdown into around 50 items in total
Key Elements in Business Continuity Management for Electric Distribution Service
PEC2
Recommended
Basic Wind Speed of
Various Wind Zones
Zone1 = 193 ---270 km/h
(Heavy)
Zone2 = 145 ---240 km/h
(Medium)
Zone3 = 96 ---160 km/h
(Light)
8
Wind Date for Designing the Electric Pole
NEA recommendation of the Distribution Improvement
9
From To
Class of Poles 5, 6 3 or 4
Span 80 , 90 m 50, 60 m
Conductor 1/0, 2/0 3/0 or 4/0
Conductor Insulation Bare Insulated
Substation Feeder 30 to 100 km Less than 20
Storm Guy 2/ km 3 / km
Case study : Prevention Investment
1. Shortening Span 80m---- 50m 2. Class 5 to Class 2
Demonstration site in Bicol area in CASURECO_2 10
Root of Typhoon Durian and Probability of Hit
11
Durian Class Every 3 years
Yolanda Class Every 40 years
Result of the simulation of MAX Wind Speed in Durian Class
Reflect the geographical Terrain on the map
12
Simulation of Fragility Rate( Class 5 to 2 / Span 80 to 50m)
Class 2
80m
50m
80m
50m
Class 2
MAX Wind Speed [m/s]
MAX Wind Speed [m/s]
Frag
ility
Rat
e
Frag
ility
Rat
e
95%
90%
70%
25%
Class 5
Loading Zones (kph) *PEC2 Previous Rural Line Design
Zone1 – Heavy 270 193
Zone2 – Medium 240 145
Zone3 – Light 160 96
75m/s
=270km/h
75m/s
=270km/h
*Philippine Electrical Code Part 2 13
Preventive Investment (Existing 80m to 50m)
Pole Span: 80m, Number of poles: 10 pcs
Pole Span: 50m, Number of
poles: 16 pcs
System Hardening
Pole Span: 80m to 50m (1/1.6)
Number of Poles: 10 to 16 (160%)
14
Pole Class
Span (m) (1) Total pole s (2) Damaged poles (3) rate = (2) / (1)
Existing 5 80 2,673 282 10.5%
Countermeasure (Span)
5 60 3,564 166 4.7%
5 50 4,277 115 2.7%
5 40 5,346 75 1.4%
Countermeasure (Span
& Pole
reinforce)
2 80 2,673 30 1.1%
2 60 3,564 21 0.6%
2 50 4,277 18 0.4%
2 40 5,346 15 0.3%
Result of the estimated damaged poles by Fragility Rate
15
Economic Comparison of Preparedness (Span short / Pole strengthen)
Source: Calculated by Study Team
Almost 2 times
Life time of Pole =40 years
16
18
Next Step to Introduce Financial Incentive Scheme on Disaster Resiliency
We believe improving disaster resilience of ECs will lead to stronger stability of electric supply, better financial soundness of ECs in the long-term, and more solid operation base for local companies, which will reduce credit risks of ECs and local companies in the long run.
Next step to realize this financial incentive mechanism for disaster resilience will be: • To consider possible financing to NEA for its preferential lending to ECs • To consider possible funding to LGUGC for its preferential guarantee program • To consider possible two-step loan program for commercial banks’ loans to ECs • To continue discussion on collaboration and bundling of each effort in disaster
risk financing
Disaster risk financing will be important for not only ECs but also other infrastructure sectors and industries. Discussion platform among commercial banks may be required for the financial industry to move forward with its efforts in this field.