case report botulinum toxin a injection in the bladder...

4
Case Report Botulinum Toxin A Injection in the Bladder Neck: A Promising Treatment for Urinary Retention Marianne Alam, 1 Joseph Zgheib, 1 Mohamad-Fadi Dalati, 2 and Fouad El Khoury 1 1 University of Balamand, St. George Hospital University Medical Center (SGHUMC), Beirut 1100 2807, Lebanon 2 Collaborateur Scientifique d’Urologie, CHU St. Pierre, 1000 Brussels, Belgium Correspondence should be addressed to Mohamad-Fadi Dalati; [email protected] Received 10 January 2016; Accepted 25 February 2016 Academic Editor: ChunHou Liao Copyright © 2016 Marianne Alam et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Secondary to failure of optimal medical therapy and the high morbidity that accompanies surgical techniques in high risk patients, the use of de novo treatments including botulinum toxin A is emerging in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). However, the treatment of urinary retention secondary to BPH via injecting botulinum toxin into the bladder neck is not well established in the literature. is case report describes the case of a 75-year-old male patient with a chronic history of obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and multiple comorbidities who was admitted to the hospital for management of recurrent urinary retention. e patient was not a surgical candidate for transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP) or transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Botulinum toxin injection into the bladder neck was performed with very satisfying results. Botulinum toxin injection in the bladder neck presents a promising minimally invasive, tolerated, and cost-effective approach for the treatment of urinary retention in patients with benign prostatic obstruction who are not candidates for surgery or in whom medical treatment has failed. More research is needed to identify the efficacy of this novel approach. 1. Introduction Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a benign enlargement of the prostate gland that affects 30% of males between 50 and 60 years old and up to 90% of males above the age of 85 years [1]. Symptoms of BPH result from obstruction of the prostatic urethra and gradual failure of bladder func- tion, which result in a deficient bladder emptying that can lead to complications, including acute urinary retention [2]. Although several treatment options are available, following the adverse effects of medical treatments and the morbidity that accompanies surgical techniques in high risk patients, the use of de novo treating modalities is emerging in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia [3]. Yet, available research on this topic has mainly reported injections sites into the prostate. To the best of our knowledge, no study has described Botox injections into the bladder neck as an alter- native treatment for BPH. e patient described in this case report underwent bladder neck injection for the management of urinary retention with satisfying postprocedure outcomes. 2. Case Presentation A 75-year-old male patient known to have hypertension, diabetes mellitus for 35 years, chronic kidney disease (base- line creatinine 2.4 mg/dL), congestive heart failure (ejection fraction 37%), obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and peripheral vascular disease presented for syn- cope. e list of the patient’s medications is shown in Table 1. Investigations in the hospital were done and the patient was diagnosed with decompensation of heart failure by pneumonia. During his hospital stay, the patient developed acute urinary retention (postvoid residue PVR 1200 mL). Urologic evaluation revealed a chronic history of bladder outlet obstruction with an IPSS score of 32 despite treatment with alpha blockers. Digital rectal exam was compatible with a small and soſt prostate. Cystoscopy was done and showed a mild bilobar prostatic hypertrophy but significantly obstructive and high bladder neck. e patient was scheduled for transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP) but clearance for surgery was denied from both anesthesia and cardiology Hindawi Publishing Corporation Case Reports in Urology Volume 2016, Article ID 6385276, 3 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6385276

Upload: others

Post on 06-Jun-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Case Report Botulinum Toxin A Injection in the Bladder ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/criu/2016/6385276.pdf · Wrapping up this case report, botulinum toxin injection into the

Case ReportBotulinum Toxin A Injection in the Bladder Neck:A Promising Treatment for Urinary Retention

Marianne Alam,1 Joseph Zgheib,1 Mohamad-Fadi Dalati,2 and Fouad El Khoury1

1University of Balamand, St. George Hospital University Medical Center (SGHUMC), Beirut 1100 2807, Lebanon2Collaborateur Scientifique d’Urologie, CHU St. Pierre, 1000 Brussels, Belgium

Correspondence should be addressed to Mohamad-Fadi Dalati; [email protected]

Received 10 January 2016; Accepted 25 February 2016

Academic Editor: ChunHou Liao

Copyright © 2016 Marianne Alam et al.This is an open access article distributed under the Creative CommonsAttribution License,which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Secondary to failure of optimal medical therapy and the high morbidity that accompanies surgical techniques in high risk patients,the use of de novo treatments including botulinum toxin A is emerging in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).However, the treatment of urinary retention secondary to BPH via injecting botulinum toxin into the bladder neck is not wellestablished in the literature. This case report describes the case of a 75-year-old male patient with a chronic history of obstructivelower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and multiple comorbidities who was admitted to the hospital for management of recurrenturinary retention. The patient was not a surgical candidate for transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP) or transurethralresection of the prostate (TURP). Botulinum toxin injection into the bladder neck was performed with very satisfying results.Botulinum toxin injection in the bladder neck presents a promising minimally invasive, tolerated, and cost-effective approach forthe treatment of urinary retention in patients with benign prostatic obstruction who are not candidates for surgery or in whommedical treatment has failed. More research is needed to identify the efficacy of this novel approach.

1. Introduction

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a benign enlargementof the prostate gland that affects 30% of males between 50and 60 years old and up to 90% of males above the age of85 years [1]. Symptoms of BPH result from obstruction ofthe prostatic urethra and gradual failure of bladder func-tion, which result in a deficient bladder emptying that canlead to complications, including acute urinary retention [2].Although several treatment options are available, followingthe adverse effects of medical treatments and the morbiditythat accompanies surgical techniques in high risk patients,the use of de novo treating modalities is emerging in thetreatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia [3]. Yet, availableresearch on this topic has mainly reported injections sitesinto the prostate. To the best of our knowledge, no study hasdescribed Botox injections into the bladder neck as an alter-native treatment for BPH. The patient described in this casereport underwent bladder neck injection for themanagementof urinary retention with satisfying postprocedure outcomes.

2. Case Presentation

A 75-year-old male patient known to have hypertension,diabetes mellitus for 35 years, chronic kidney disease (base-line creatinine 2.4mg/dL), congestive heart failure (ejectionfraction 37%), obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms(LUTS), and peripheral vascular disease presented for syn-cope. The list of the patient’s medications is shown in Table 1.Investigations in the hospital were done and the patientwas diagnosed with decompensation of heart failure bypneumonia. During his hospital stay, the patient developedacute urinary retention (postvoid residue PVR 1200mL).Urologic evaluation revealed a chronic history of bladderoutlet obstruction with an IPSS score of 32 despite treatmentwith alpha blockers. Digital rectal exam was compatiblewith a small and soft prostate. Cystoscopy was done andshowed amild bilobar prostatic hypertrophy but significantlyobstructive and high bladder neck.The patient was scheduledfor transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP) but clearancefor surgery was denied from both anesthesia and cardiology

Hindawi Publishing CorporationCase Reports in UrologyVolume 2016, Article ID 6385276, 3 pageshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6385276

Page 2: Case Report Botulinum Toxin A Injection in the Bladder ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/criu/2016/6385276.pdf · Wrapping up this case report, botulinum toxin injection into the

2 Case Reports in Urology

Table 1: Medications.

Medication Dosage and frequencyCynt 4mg 1 tablet once dailyIsoptin 240mg 1 tablet once dailyAspicor 81mg 1 tablet once dailySilosin 8mg 1 tablet once dailyTrajenta 5mg 1 tablet once daily

Figure 1: Bladder neck hypertrophy before the injection, causingalmost complete bladder outlet obstruction (BOO).

teams due to unfavorable cardiac status. Later on, the patientpresented to the emergency room for acute urinary retentionon several occasions. A 16 Fr hydrogel coated Foley catheterwas kept for 16 days and 2 attempts to remove the catheterresulted in failure even after maximizing medical therapyfor bladder outlet obstruction. An ultrasound was donefor further evaluation revealing a 25-gram prostate. Thepatient was informed that a trial of onabotulinumtoxinAinjection into the bladder neck can be attempted under localanesthesia. He was well informed that this treatment is onlybeing done in clinical trials and accepted to undergo theprocedure.

3. Treatment

Under local anesthesia, inoculation of 100U of onabo-tulinumtoxinA, BOTOX�, diluted in 10 cc of normal salinesolution (divided into 10 injections of 1 cc each) into thebladder neck was performed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 o’clock (Figures1–3). The patient tolerated well the procedure and a Foleycatheter was placed.

4. Outcome and Follow-Up

TheFoley catheter was removed day 1 post-op and the patientvoided spontaneously. Postvoid residue was measured usingsuprapubic ultrasound which gave an estimation of 78mL(Figure 4). The patient was discharged home. 30 days post-op, the patient was received in the clinics for a follow-up visit.He denied signs or symptoms of UTI, dysuria, hematuria,retention, or any other adverse event. His I-PSS score wasnoted to be 9, suggesting a significant objective improvement.

5. Discussion

Botulinum toxin type A has been used by neurologists asa treatment for neuromuscular conditions such as dystonia

Figure 2: Bladder neck Botox injections at 3 o’clock.

Figure 3: Botox injection over anterior bladder neck.

Figure 4: PVR after Botox injections: 78mL.

and spasticity and has recently been publicized for the man-agement of facial wrinkles. The usefulness behind its use liesbehind its property of inhibiting acetylcholine release at theneuromuscular junction. De novo uses of botulinum toxinhave expanded to other conditions such as hypersecretorydisorders, tics, tremor, stuttering, different pain syndromes,gastrointestinal smooth muscle/sphincter spasms, and manyurological conditions, notably symptomatic treatment ofoveractive bladder (OAB) [4]. As recommended by theEuropean Association of Urology, botulinum toxin injectionin the detrusor muscle of the bladder is the most effectiveminimally invasive therapy to decrease neurogenic detrusoroveractivity (Grade A recommendation) [5].

The intraprostatic injection of botulinumneurotoxin typeA (BoNT-A) is a minimally invasive usage of the drug to treatbenign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and subsequent lowerurinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Previous studies have shownimprovement of maximum urinary flow rate, quality-of-lifeindex, and reduction of International Prostate SymptomsScore (IPSS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, postvoidresidual volume, and prostate volume [6]. However, unlikeother studies that have focused on intraprostatic injection

Page 3: Case Report Botulinum Toxin A Injection in the Bladder ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/criu/2016/6385276.pdf · Wrapping up this case report, botulinum toxin injection into the

Case Reports in Urology 3

of BoNT-A, this case report which performed transurethralinjection into the bladder neck, notably the anterior urethralwall, presents a promising and safe novel therapy for thetreatment of urinary retention in patients with bladder neckhypertrophy who are poor surgical candidates or in whommedical treatment has failed. As our case have shown,after bladder neck injection, the patient presenting withhistory of recurrent episodes of urinary retention had majorimprovements in postvoid residue and IPSS scores. Besides,the use of transurethral approach provides a direct view of thebladder neck,median lobe, and transition zone and presents asecure method as compared to transrectal and transperinealinjections [7]. Also, transurethral injection of BoNT-A wasdone with only local anesthesia compared to other studiesusing epidural and general or light general anesthesia [6].This route of administration has been observed to be a safeprocedure. Studies have revealed no early or late complica-tions and patients usually tolerate the injections well [8]. Theunderlying mechanism behind the symptoms relief is relatedto volume shrinkage (decreasing the level of obstruction bythe high bladder neck) as well as smooth muscle inhibitionand relaxation [9].

The relief in symptoms is most probably related tothe relaxing properties of the toxin as observed in otherapplications of the drug. Although not demonstrated, thedose of 100U seems appropriate to obtain satisfactory results.

Multiple minimally invasive procedures that deal withmedically resistant, surgically contraindicated BPH haveemerged. One of the latter techniques “Urolift” is used torelieve urinary symptoms caused by BPH. It is a minimallyinvasive approach that lifts the enlarged prostate, relievingobstruction, and can be done under local anesthesia [10].However, such technique, like others, deals mainly with BPHrather than high bladder neck presented in our case and maynot be recommended for patients with high bladder neck ormodest median lobe.

6. Conclusion

Wrapping up this case report, botulinum toxin injectioninto the bladder neck appears to offer a new promisingtreatment option for bladder neck hypertrophy. However,further trials are needed to establish the validity of thisnew indication as well as the adequate dosage of the toxinrequired. Establishment of follow-up protocols, time intervalbetween injections, and comorbidities associated with thistreatment need to be appropriately addressed. The ease ofinstallation, the lack of need of anesthesia, the possibilityof outpatient treatment models, and the efficacy of suchminimally invasive approach to persistent LUTS due tobladder neck hypertrophy seem to be of a promising value.Our team will continue to further study such approach, withenrolment of new patients for better understanding of thebenefits of such treatment modalities. To the best of ourknowledge, such minimally invasive approach for treatmentof medication-refractory urinary retention due to bladderneck hypertrophy is the first of its kind in the Middle Eastregion.

Disclosure

The authors confirm that the paper has been read andapproved by all named authors. The authors also confirmthat they have given due consideration to the protection ofintellectual property associated with this work and that thereare no impediments to publication, including the timing ofpublication, with respect to intellectual property. In so doingthe authors confirm that they have followed the regulationsof their institutions concerning intellectual property.

Competing Interests

The authors wish to confirm that there is no known conflictof interests associated with this paper and there has been nosignificant financial support for this work that could haveinfluenced its outcome.

References

[1] A. Cantlay and H. N. Raghallaigh, “Benign prostatic hyperpla-sia,” InnovAiT: Education and Inspiration for General Practice,vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 238–245, 2015.

[2] C. Roehrborn, “Botulinum toxin type A improves benignprostatic hyperplasia symptoms in patients with small prostates:Chuang Y-C, Chiang P-H, Huang C-C, et al (Chang GungMemHosp, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Univ of Pittsburgh, Pa) Urology66:775–779, 2005,” Yearbook of Urology, vol. 2006, pp. 125–127,2006.

[3] T. Leippold, A. Reitz, and B. Schurch, “Botulinum toxin as a newtherapy option for voiding disorders: current state of the art,”European Urology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 165–174, 2003.

[4] R. Bhidayasiri and D. D. Truong, “Expanding use of botulinumtoxin,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 235, no. 1-2, pp.1–9, 2005.

[5] B. Blok, J. Pannek, D. Castro Diaz et al., Guidelines on Neuro-Urology, Uroweb, 2015, http://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/EAU-Guidelines-Neuro-Urology-2015-v2.pdf.

[6] A. Oeconomou, H. Madersbacher, G. Kiss, T. J. Berger, M.Melekos, and P. Rehder, “Is botulinum neurotoxin type A(BoNT-A) a novel therapy for lower urinary tract symptomsdue to benign prostatic enlargement? A review of the literature,”European Urology, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 765–777, 2008.

[7] Y. C. Chuang, “Minimally invasive therapy for BPH,” Inconti-nence and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, vol. 1, supplement 2, pp. 21–24, 2007.

[8] M. Jasinski, T. Drewa, J. Tyloch, and Z. Wolski, “N56 Isbotulinum toxin type A intraprostatic injections effective inpatients with urinary retention?” European Urology Supple-ments, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 587–588, 2009.

[9] Y.-C. Chuang, P.-H. Chiang, N. Yoshimura, F. De Miguel, andM. B. Chancellor, “Sustained beneficial effects of intraprostaticbotulinum toxin type A on lower urinary tract symptoms andquality of life in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia,” BJUInternational, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 1033–1037, 2006.

[10] T. A. McNicholas, H. H.Woo, P. T. Chin et al., “Minimally inva-sive prostatic urethral lift: surgical technique and multinationalexperience,” European Urology, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 292–299, 2013.

Page 4: Case Report Botulinum Toxin A Injection in the Bladder ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/criu/2016/6385276.pdf · Wrapping up this case report, botulinum toxin injection into the

Submit your manuscripts athttp://www.hindawi.com

Stem CellsInternational

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION

of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Behavioural Neurology

EndocrinologyInternational Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Disease Markers

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

BioMed Research International

OncologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

PPAR Research

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Immunology ResearchHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Journal of

ObesityJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

OphthalmologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Diabetes ResearchJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Research and TreatmentAIDS

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Parkinson’s Disease

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Volume 2014Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com