case power point
TRANSCRIPT
Many languages have a CASE SYSTEM.
What is a CASE SYSTEM
Example of Case System:
a set of affixes (almost always suffixes) that mark the relations that NPs bear to their governors.
CASE SYSTEM occurs in Australian Language, Pitta-Pitta.
Each case is represented by a single form.
There is one complication.
The subject of an intransitive verb is unmarked.
The subject of a transitive verb is marked by a suffix –lu (the ergative case) that marks instruments.
CASE SUFFIXES SUFFIXES SENTENCES
Nominative -Ø The dog ran away (INTRANSITIVE SUBJECT)
Ergative / instrumental
-lu The man hit the dog with a stick (TRANSITIVE SUBJECT andinstrumental)
Accusative -nha The dog bit the man (direct object)
Dative / pergressive -ku The dog is fond of the man, The dog swam through the flood
Purposive / possesive -nga The woman’s dog went for the paper
locative -ina The dog swam in the creek
allative -inu The dog went to the creek
ablative -inya The dog name back from the creek
causal -la The dog hid from the policeman
The nominative is used for nouns in isolation and forthe subject of an intransitive verb.
It characteristically expresses the role of neutralpatient, including entities that ‘locomote’ (with ‘go’,‘come’, etc).
These might seem to have agent subjects, but themover is also the moved and the activity does notextend to an external entity.
karna karnta-ka
man go-past
The man went
The ergative marks the subject of a transitive verb.
It expresses the role of agent.
It also encodes the role of instrument.
karna-lu pithi-ka piyawarli-nha parnkuparnku-lu
man-erg hit past dog-acc walking:stick-erg (insr)
The man hit the dog with a stick.
The accusative marks the direct object expressing the characteristics role of affected patient.
karna-lu pithi-ka piyawarli-nha parnkuparnku-lu
man-erg hit past dog-acc walking:stick-erg (insr)The man hit the dog with a stick.
The dative function of –ku is restricted.
It marks the complement:
yatha ‘to like’
tiwa ‘be jealous of’
wapa ‘to look for’
wantili ‘to wait for’
karna yatha-ya piyawarli-ku
man like-pres dog-dat
The man likes the dog.
The pergressive function:
‘through’
‘across’
‘along’
karna yurta-ka ngarraru-ku
man swam-past flood-dat (pergressive)
The man swam through the flood
Exampe of purposive:
karna karnta-ka kupi-nga
man go-past fish-purp
The man went for (to get) fish
Example of possesive:
karna-nga piyawarli pantyi-ya
man-purp dog ail-pres
The man’s dog is sick
It indicates location in general.
Adverbs are used to give specific orientation of one entity in relation to another.
karna nhangka-y kunti-ina kukuina
man sit-pres house-loc behind
The man is (sitting) behind the house
It indicates destinations.
-inya ablativeIt indicates ‘from’, i.e. source.
karna karnta-ka Mount Isa-inya Dajarra-inu
man go-past Mt Isa-abl Dajarra-allative
The man went from Mt Isa to Dajarra
It marks causes ‘sick from (drinking) whisky, and entities that are to be avoided.
Example:
Bad spirits – not just bad whisky!
karna wilakana-ya yampi-la
man hide-pres m:in:law-causal
The man is hiding from (sc. to avoid) his mother-in-law
LATIN
Case System of Latin :
a.Suffixes express case
b.Number
c.Gender class
d.Irregularities, etc
1st declesion
‘girl’
ā stem
2nd declesion
‘slave’
o stem
3rd declesion
‘king’
Cons. stem
Nom. Puella Servus Rēx
Voc. Puella Serve Rēx
Acc. Puellam Servum Rēgem
Gen. Puellae Servī Rēgis
Dat. Puellae Servō Rēgī
Abl. puellā Servō Rēge
Nom. Puellae Servī Rēgēs
Voc. Puellae Servī Rēgēs
Acc. Puellās Servōs Rēgēs
Gen. Puellārum Servōrum Rēgum
Dat. Puellīs Servīs Rēgibus
Abl. Puellīs Servīs Rēgibus
Notes :
-The cases are distinguished on the basis of
differentiation in a single paradigm.
-The vocative is marked by a separate form only
in the second declension singular.
-There is SYNCRETISM (neutralisation) between
the nomative and vocative.
Nominative : marks the subject
Vocative : used to address someone
Accusative : marks direct object and the object
of some prepositions
Genitive : correspons to ‘s and of in English
Dative : marks indirect object of dare ‘to
give’ and the complement of a score
or so of verbs
Ablative : marks a number of distict roles
Adjective and determiners agree with their
head nouns in number, case and gender
The adjective used in the sentences below
decline like puella, servus, or bellum
according to the gender of the noun they
modify
Rex bonus dat unum servum puellae
(The good king gives one/a slave to the girl)
Regis servus iit ex Britaniā in Italiam
(The king’s slave went from Britain to Italy)
Illa puella manet in Italiā cum amicis
(That girl is staying in Italy with friends)
English, like the other Indo-European
languages, once had a case system like the
Latin. Old English had a case system almost
identical with that of modern German (the
system was almost identical not the forms,
although the forms were very similar to
those of German)
During the middle this period these were
lost (very careless) except for the sibilant
ending of the genitive (cognate with the –is
of Latin regins in the paradigms above) we
still have this, but it is not case maker
anymore. It is derivational affix that is
added to noun phrases to produce
possessive determiners.
The dog’s bone
The man down the street’s dog
The man over there’s dog
We write the genitive or possessive ‘s
with an apostrophe to distinguish it
from the plural –’we’ means educated
people over 35
With pronouns there is a two-way case
distinction: nominative versus oblique
(non-nominative). This distinction is made
suppletively, i.e. by using different stems.
Me supplies the oblique case of I, him of
he and so on
nominative oblique
First person singular I me
Third person singular he him
she her
it it
First person singular we us
Second person plural you you
Third person plural they them
In text book English the nominative
forms are used for subject and the
oblique forms for all other
functions. In real English the
nominative forms are used in
certain other constructions, eg:
between you and I.