case of the missing computer chipwp.lps.org/ckarel/files/2012/08/scientific-reasoning-fs.pdf ·...

11
Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Case of the Missing Computer Chip 1. Why was the first hypothesis difficult to make? 2. How did the EVIDENCE clues help? 3. How did the MOTIVE clues help? 4. If you changed your original hypothesis why? If you didn’t change your original hypothesis why? 5. Was all of your evidence useful? Explain. 6. Was it easy or difficult for your group to come to consensus? Explain. 7. Was it easier or more difficult to reach consensus as a class? Explain 1

Upload: dinhthuy

Post on 23-Jun-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Case of the Missing Computer Chipwp.lps.org/ckarel/files/2012/08/Scientific-Reasoning-FS.pdf · 2015-08-25 · 2.How did the EVIDENCE clues help? ... inductive and deductive reasoning

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission.

Case of the Missing Computer Chip

1. Why was the first hypothesis difficult to make? 2. How did the EVIDENCE clues help? 3. How did the MOTIVE clues help? 4. If you changed your original hypothesis why? If you didn’t

change your original hypothesis why? 5. Was all of your evidence useful? Explain. 6. Was it easy or difficult for your group to come to consensus?

Explain. 7. Was it easier or more difficult to reach consensus as a class?

Explain

1

Page 2: Case of the Missing Computer Chipwp.lps.org/ckarel/files/2012/08/Scientific-Reasoning-FS.pdf · 2015-08-25 · 2.How did the EVIDENCE clues help? ... inductive and deductive reasoning

Scientific ReasoningForensic Science

Page 3: Case of the Missing Computer Chipwp.lps.org/ckarel/files/2012/08/Scientific-Reasoning-FS.pdf · 2015-08-25 · 2.How did the EVIDENCE clues help? ... inductive and deductive reasoning

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission.

The Cycle of Science

• Scientific reasoning must use both inductive and deductive reasoning

3

Page 4: Case of the Missing Computer Chipwp.lps.org/ckarel/files/2012/08/Scientific-Reasoning-FS.pdf · 2015-08-25 · 2.How did the EVIDENCE clues help? ... inductive and deductive reasoning

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission.

The Cycle of Science (continued)

• Inductive reasoning – moving from specific observations to broader generalizations and theories – Begin with specific observations and

measurements; then detect patterns and regularities

– Formulate some tentative hypothesis that we can explore

– Finally develop some general conclusions or theories

4

Page 5: Case of the Missing Computer Chipwp.lps.org/ckarel/files/2012/08/Scientific-Reasoning-FS.pdf · 2015-08-25 · 2.How did the EVIDENCE clues help? ... inductive and deductive reasoning

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission.

The Cycle of Science (continued)

• Deductive reasoning – works from general to specific – Begin with creating a theory about a topic of

interest– Narrow that down into a more specific

hypothesis that we can test– Narrow that down even further when we

collect observations to address the hypothesis– Test the hypothesis with specific data

5

Page 6: Case of the Missing Computer Chipwp.lps.org/ckarel/files/2012/08/Scientific-Reasoning-FS.pdf · 2015-08-25 · 2.How did the EVIDENCE clues help? ... inductive and deductive reasoning

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission.

How Scientists Reason

• Scientists use the scientific method to generate hypotheses, create experiments to test them, comprehend patterns of data, and form theories.

6

Page 7: Case of the Missing Computer Chipwp.lps.org/ckarel/files/2012/08/Scientific-Reasoning-FS.pdf · 2015-08-25 · 2.How did the EVIDENCE clues help? ... inductive and deductive reasoning

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission.

Scientific Method

7

Page 8: Case of the Missing Computer Chipwp.lps.org/ckarel/files/2012/08/Scientific-Reasoning-FS.pdf · 2015-08-25 · 2.How did the EVIDENCE clues help? ... inductive and deductive reasoning

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission.

Observation

• Observations are recorded facts about what you see (vs. inference)

• There are two types of observations– Quantitative – results in a

numerical form, with a unit– Qualitative – results in a

descriptive form

8

Page 9: Case of the Missing Computer Chipwp.lps.org/ckarel/files/2012/08/Scientific-Reasoning-FS.pdf · 2015-08-25 · 2.How did the EVIDENCE clues help? ... inductive and deductive reasoning

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission.

Experimental Control

• Scientists work to create experimental control

• It is important for comparison, so scientists know what has the effect in the experiment

• The control is the normal condition(s) for the subject being tested

9

Page 10: Case of the Missing Computer Chipwp.lps.org/ckarel/files/2012/08/Scientific-Reasoning-FS.pdf · 2015-08-25 · 2.How did the EVIDENCE clues help? ... inductive and deductive reasoning

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission.

Variable

• The variable is the thing that is being changed in the experiment

• You should only have one variable

10

Page 11: Case of the Missing Computer Chipwp.lps.org/ckarel/files/2012/08/Scientific-Reasoning-FS.pdf · 2015-08-25 · 2.How did the EVIDENCE clues help? ... inductive and deductive reasoning

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission.

Conclusions

• Scientists make conclusions based on the data collected and the observations made

• Sometimes they support the hypothesis and sometimes they do not–Modify the hypothesis!

11