caribou lake property location and access (fig. 1)€¦ · property geology (map 1) as mentioned...

CARIBOU LAKE PROPERTY41H16NE0002 OM91-154 MCCONKEY 010

Location and Access (Fig. 1)

The Caribou Property is located in Central Ontario approximately 62 kilometers north of the town of Parry Sound and 320 kilometers from Toronto. The claim group overlies and is north of Caribou Lake and can be seen on Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines claim map M-12/Township of McConkey. National Topographic System Map 41H/16 includes the area.

A gravel road leading off Provincial Highway 522 crosses the southern portion of the property in the vicinity of the south baseline. The north baseline is accessible by water and a logging trail suitable for all terrain vehicles which commences in Deep Bay and proceeds north. Other more or less passable logging trails were seen during the mapping program and could provide access with little effort in clearing.

Property and Claim Status (Fig. 2)

The property comprises 18 claims numbered 1091767 to 1091776 and 1097425 to 1097432 (inclusive) recorded in the name of James R. Atkinson and optioned by agreement to Tylox Resources Corporation of Vancouver, B.C.

The property is in good standing to October 25, 1991 by order of extension of time.

History and Previous Work

Interest was first generated in the Caribou Lake area during mapping and field investi gations by Government geologists in 1899 (Coleman, p. 259-262) and 1900 (Coleman, p. 170- 171) which described several pits which had been sunk into rusty zones. These studies result ed in reported values up to 1.55 percent copper, 1.2 percent nickel, one ounce gold and 8 grams platinum.

Possibly about this time several prospect pits were excavated in the area notably on Lot 15 Concession 4 and Lot 18 Concession 4 and may have lead to the discovery of deposits of muscovite related to granite pegmatite dykes and referenced in statistical reviews of the mineral industry of Ontario (Gibson 1909, etc. Rogers 1916).

Local residents recall small exploration efforts in the 1930's and 1940's on the base metal and mica showings but the first drilling was not completed until 1951 to test magnetic anomalies beneath the waters of Caribou Lake. This resulted in 45 feet of core which assayed 0.23 Wi copper and 0.1596 nickel.

Further work in the late 1950's and early 1960's included magnetic, electromagnetic, self potential and total heavy metal (soil) surveys and drilling in the area of the present claim group. (Fig.3)

A strong IP response was identified trending north-south on the eastern boundary of the claims, notably associated with old trenches on Lot 15, Con. 4.

In 1968, Hudson Bay Exploration and Development completed a magnetic and electro magnetic survey and drilled 11 holes to test the resultant anomalies. These holes were con-

l

MortntUJ- '*1S l. 1SiEe-ô?f"'n

s L ^Lac B*ux**™ ^duFili-^

tit-Sagua'^ t v?T" st--s*iir-C'-r.Tl ; "N s,^S3| -^ss^^^^J^ ,^,,^rl l*-*-^*.^*- ^TE^&M^'^K^^^

"" î^^^v^LJHabôrtp'^h'f^?^ uhS^f*

fW" ^...-o.-'iS.JiromXiChari.m^S

,o - sind r^w-- 0v^2*^^feu^.?-^*!^^^

.-. m

l

TYLOX RESOURCES CORP.

CARIBOU LAKE Mcconkey Twp

FIG. 1: Local

Scale: 1

James R. AtkinsonConsulting Geologist

PROPERTY ., Ontario

ion

:2, 980, 000

SCALEDATE :FIG. No.:


CARIBOU LAKE PROPERTY Mcconkey Twp., Ontario

FIG.2: C laim Information

Scale: 1:31,680


SCALEDATE :FIG. No.

V \6

Dr i 11 Ho l e RES Resistivity Anomaly —" Total Heavy Metals

Aeromag Contours

Scale: 1:20,000



PROPERTY ., Ontario

FIG. 3: Previous Work


SCALEDATEFIG. No. .

centrated on a band of anomalies to the northwest of the present claim group. Most anoma lous responses were attributed to inclusions of graphitic and sulphidic paragneiss in the norite.

Work in the 1980's included reconnaissance mapping and sampling by Platinova Re sources in 1986 and an Airborne Magnetic and VLF-EM Survey by Aerodat for Noramco Explorations followed by sampling and geological mapping.

'fable 1; Work History-Caribou Area

1951 Chubb Syndicate Mag Survey, 1500' drilling1954 Newkirk Mining Airborne EM and Mag1955 Aumaque Gold Mines Resistivity, EM, SP, Mag, THM

Soils, 9 Drill Holes - 5,333'1959 Twin Basin Mines Drilling - 3,000'1964 Loring Syndicate Mag, IP, Trenching, Drilling

3 to 5 holes1968 Hudson Bay Exploration

and Development EM, Mag, 11 Drill holes-4,075'1986 Platinova Resources Surface Sampling1987 Noramco Exploration Inc. Surface Sampling, Mapping

Airborne Mag, VLF-EM

Present Work Program

The present program comprised geological mapping, chip and select sample col lection and soil sampling. This was completed in the period Friday, October 4 to Friday, October 11, 1991 by the author. The work was accomplished along chained flagged lines originating at two baselines to the north and south of Caribou Lake. Examination of air borne magnetic survey conducted by Noramco suggests that linear features in the norite strike east-west in the south and north-south in the north necessitating two baselines of different orientation (Fig.4).

A total of 14.25 kilometers of lines were traversed, sampled and mapped. This resulted in 136 soil samples and 18 rock chip samples. Analyses were carried out by Chemex Labs Limited of Mississauga for gold, silver, cobalt, copper, manganese, molyb denum, nickel, lead, zinc and iron.

Regional Geology (Fig. 5)

The property lies in the Caribou Lake Intrusive, a layered, differentiated mafic intrusive in the Britt Domain of the Churchill Province of the Canadian Shield (Davidson et al, 1982) close to highly tectonized rocks of the Parry Sound/Britt Boundary Zone.

The intrusive has been described by Friedman (1957), as an 18 square kilometer layered body of norite composition with a "droplet" shape. Country rocks include granitic and biotitic gneisses which trend north-south to north-northwest but seem to curve around the intrusive. These are described by Davidson et al (1982) as semipeletic (hornblende- biotite-plagioclase-quartz with red garnet) with quartitic and pelitic interlayers (carrying sillimanite and/or kyanite, biotite, graphite, pyrite and characteristically violet-pink garnet and lacking hornblende).

Structures in the gneisses are dominated by northwest trending open folds and east-west and northeast trending faults defined by regional scale linears.

^Caribou

o



PROPERTY ., Ontario

FIG.4: Grid Layout

Scale: 1:20,000


SCALE :DATE :FIG. No..

Figure 30.2. D istribution in Britt Domain of folded metaplutonic units (numbered), semipelitic and pelitic gneiss (stippled) and zone of highly tectomzed rocks (close-spaced lines). H is hypersthene. S is sapphirine-bearing 'meta-eclogite' nodule in tectonite zone. See teit for description of numbered units. Cross-hatched unit is Caribou Lake Gabbro. A - Arnstein, B-Britt. PB - Pointe-au-Baril, W - Wahwashkesh Lake. PS - Parry Sound, /v-om.. /9 . CW.4s*~ e-f a-1 -



PROPERTY ., Ontario

FIG. 5: Regional Geology (from A. Davidson

et al, 1982)


SCALEDATE .FIG No-.

Property Geology (Map 1)

As mentioned above, the property lies within the Caribou Lake intrusive. Out crops observed during the mapping program were dominantly fine to medium grained norite with plagioclase/pyroxene ratios ranging from 1:1 to 2:1. The outcrops are commonly brown weathering to rusty and locally "rotted". Accessory iron oxides are commonly present but in one locality east of Deep Bay magnetite forms massive to semi-massive pods and a strong magnetic attraction is seen. The norite generally does not show a strong magnetic signature.

Secondary biotite, hornblende and quartz (as silicification) were noted locally, especially in more sheared exposures or associated with paragneiss inclusions.

Locally the grain size increases to the extent that a "pegmatitic" texture is seen this Mafic Pegmatoid commonly has pyroxene crystals up to 6 cm and large magnetite or chromite crystals.

Granitic pegmatite is seen in the western part of the property. It is usually made up of very large potassic feldspar, glassy tp smoky quartz and varying amounts of musco vite and biotite. Accessory garnet, magnetite and tourmaline are seen. A small amount of free splitting muscovite was mined from locations close to the shore of the lake in the west central part of the property.

Norite has been altered to amphibolite close to the pegmatite dykes where the contact is observed but the effects are less than l meter wide.

Inclusions of the rocks of the "roof of the instrusion are present as quartz-biotite- graphite gneiss (paragneiss). These range in size from 10 cm to 150 metres in length and display a prominant foliation. Folding is often seen in this foliation showing active move ment during assimilation by the norite.

Pyroxemite, comprising coarse grained, greenish pyroxene and olivine with poiki litic bronzite is seen as a probable dyke cutting norite on the eastern edge of Deep Bay.

The pyroxenite is intrusive into the norite and causes alteration of the adjacent norite. This comprises "bluish-green" coloration of the plagioclase due to the addition of chlorite and the presence of increased pyrite and chalcopyrite in these rocks. The pyroxemite has strong fracturing which trends north-south and dips 45 to the west.

Structure

Foliations in the norite were used by Friedland (1957) to define two synformal features in the Caribou Lake Intrusive. Recent aeromagnetic data (Noramco, 1987) seems to suggest, however, a single circular (synclinal?) feature centered just to the northwest of Deep Bay in the area of one of Friedlands synclinal features. Drilling by Hudson Bay Exploration and Development in the northern part of his feature has intersected bands of quartz-biotite-graphite gneiss suggesting the concentric shape in that area, at least, is formed by trains or layers of inclusions.

Rare shear zones are seen cutting the norite in a north-south or northwest direction as well developed fracturing and schistosity. Only one outcrop reflects the "Caribou Lake Fault" which is postulated to pass east-west through the long arm of the lake and can be seen as a topographic feature to the east of the property.

Strong gneissosity is seen in paragneiss exposures on the property. Freidman indicates a consistent northeast trend and southeast dip on his map (1957) however, as can be seen from Map l the trend of gneissosity is variable ranging from 030 /45 NE on L10W at 7-FSON to 100 /40 N on L8W @ 5 4-SON to north-south strike with east dips on L4S at O 4-25W. Notably the paragneiss is folded in several locations with outcrop-scale folds and the changes in the strike and dip noted above, may reflect larger scale folds or simply reori- entation during assimilation.

The fault zones indicated by shearing, airphoto linears and topography seem to have only minor affects on the rocks of the property. For instance, the Caribou Lake Fault seems to cause less than 100 meters offset (Friedland, 1957) of the contact between the norite and surrounding gneisses while other faults indicated by geophysics or schistosity seem to have only minor affects.

A mylonite zone was discovered on the south shore of the western arm of the Lake (L2W, 2+OON). The exposure, in the face of a small cliff, shows an east west strike and shallow south dip (100/20 S). The mylonite is typified by quartz lenses and discs, feldspar augen and garnet porphyroblasts. Along strike this unit grades into paragneiss and may be a highly sheared, partially melted inclusion or a strongly deformed pegmatoid in a shear zone.

The relationship of this mylonite to the Caribou Lake Fault is not known but the fault is generally thought to be steep (fracture cleavage and schistosity in the norite confirm this) and more brittle in nature.

Mineralization and Alteration

Most sulphide mineralization seen during the current program is associated with paragneiss, however, locally disseminated pyrrhotite with minor pyrite and chalcopyrite is seen. Some of these occurrences are associated with late stage faults (L12W l -HSON) but often no obvious causative features are seen.

An increased amount of sulphide is seen along the eastern contact between the pyroxenite and norite east of Deep Bay associated with strong alteration of the norite (Sample 3028 and 3029).

Silicification of the norite and weak pyrrhotite mineralization is seen on L4W at 2+50N. The alteration occurs as 2 centimeter "patches" in an otherwise massive norite and may reflect contamination of the mafic magma during assimilation of paragneiss.

A series of 18 chip and grab samples were collected from mineralized outcrops and analysed for Au, Ag, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn at Chemex Laboratories in Mississauga, Table 2 highlights significant results and Appendix A gives details of the analyses and sample descriptions.

"fable 2; Rock Sample Results (see Appendix A)

Sample____Description_________________Comments

3014 Fine grained norite low in all elements3015 Norite close to shear low in all elements3016 Paragneiss low in all elements3017 Anorthosite inclusion low in all elements30ISA Paragneiss weak molybdenum, gold30188(3030) Paragneiss weak gold,molybdenum,zinc3018C(3031) Paragneiss molybdenum, lead anomaly3019 Paragneiss close to mylonite weak copper3020 Paragneiss (chip 2.5 m) weak zinc3021 Paragneiss (chip 2.0 m) zinc anomaly3022 Paragneiss (chip 2.5 m) weak molybdenum, copper3023 Norite (magnetite rich) high iron3024 Norite low in all elements3025 Paragneiss molybdenum anomaly3026 Paragneiss weak gold, molybdenum3027 Paragneiss weak molybdenum3028 Altered Norite high copper, nickel3029 Altered Norite high nickel, copper

The most significant results are associated with the eastern contact of the pyroxenite, mentioned above, in samples 3028 and 3029 (713 ppm Cu, 256 ppm Ni and 271 ppm Cu and 630 ppm Ni respectively).

Elevated zinc values occur in paragneiss samples close to L8W 5+50N (samples 3020 to 3022). Notably, these were 2.0 to 2.5 metre chip samples across rusty quartz-biotite- graphite paragneiss.

Not surprisingly, high iron ( > 1 596) is associated with sample 3023 containing massive magnetite pods collected close to NBL 6+75 south.

Soil Sampling

A series of 135 soil samples were collected from the property using agrub hoe to dig small pits to expose the B Horizon. The samples were collected at an average of 20 to 30 centimeters depth with occasional deeper pits required where thick organic layers were seen (Appendix B: soil sampling information). It was not difficult to identify the B Horizon, generally, even though well developed leached (A2) horizons were not always present.

Soils are generally of Podzol type (Levinson, 1974) with relative thick organic accumulation and red brown to brown to rarely orange colored B horizon. As mentioned above a grey leached A2 is not always present and seems to be more common where conifer ous trees predominate in the forest cover.

Overburden is sandy till with very small areas of boulder till and clay. Often the shallow nature of the overburden is evident as bedrock is encountered in the sampling pit. Glacial transport in the area is from the north as indicated by glacial stria. The topography is gently rolling but rarely hills up to 10 metres are encountered.

Samples were collected along lines spaced 200 meters apart at stations placed 100 meters apart. This is considered a reconnaissance level of survey and should be useful as an indicator of areas for follow-up and detailing.

One silt sample was collected from a stream flowing onto the property from the west. The sample showed manganese and iron enrichment and a weak cobalt anomaly.

The samples, which were placed in (4 H x6") kraft paper bags, were air dried before being sent to the laboratory for analyses at Chemex Lab in Mississauga. There, the sample was oven dried and sieved to -80 mesh in preparation for analyses. Gold was analysed using a combination fire and assay atomic absorption while the remaining elements were analysed by ICP after nitric-aqua-regia digestion.

Results are presented in Appendix B and summarized in Table 3. Following the practise of Hawkes and Webb (1962), and because the generally consistant bedrock may allow representation as a single population, anomalies were defined as those values which exceeded the mean plus 2 times the standard deviation. Because of the small number of samples and to allow a broader search a category of "possibly anomalous" was defined at the value equal to the mean plus the standard diviation.

Table 3 ; Soil Geochemistry-Statistical Data

Element Mean (x)

Standard Deviation

Possibly Anomalous

Definitely Anomalous

Cu 14 42

Ni 17 22

Pb 44

Zn 74 37

Au 42

Co 10 9

Mo l 1.5

Ag no values above 0.5 ppm

52

39

8

111

6

19

2.5

98

61

12

148

8

28

4

It should be noted that iron (Fe) and manganese (Ma) were not evaluated for anomalous values but are useful in evaluation of other metals. It is well do documented in literature that these two elements can scavenge other metals. Thus, high values of Fe and Mn associated with an anomalous base metal value would tend to discount the importance of the anomaly.

Description of Results (Maps 2 to 4)

The soil sampling was intended to identify areas of unexplored mineralization covered by the thin but extensive overburden. The method of defining anomalous values was described above. This resulted in the identification of the following anomalies:

A - L2N3-HOOWto44-OOW - copper and nickelB - L4N5+OOW - copper and nickelC - NBL2+OON - nickelD - NBL5+OOS - zincE - LON ^OOto2-KX)W - zinc and possibly leadF - L2W4+OON - zincG - L2W6+OON - zinc and leadH - L6W l+OONtoS+OON - zincI - LlOWS+OONtoe+OON - zinc and possibly lead

It should be noted that although gold values of 10 ppb would be statistically anoma lous the isolated nature of the gold values seen in the soil sampling and the fact that no values exceed 10 ppb, means that anomalies were not highlighted for gold alone.

Discussion of Results

The anomalies described above have been rated in importance with anomalies "A", "B" and "C-E" being the most interesting. No exposures are seen in the area of either of the first two anomalies, although, the area is presumed to be underlain by norite, and norite with mafic pegmatoid occurs in outcrops close to anomaly C.

The remaining anomalies are dominated by high zinc and lead values with weaker copper. Often these are associated with observed pyritic, graphitic paragneiss. For example, Anomaly E occurs just north of and along strike from paragneiss; Anomaly I overlies parag neiss exposures, and Anomaly G is associated with paragneiss along the shore of the lake. However, other zinc-lead anomalies occur in ares of abundant norite exposures (for example Anomaly D, F and H).

Weak indications of zonation can be seen in anomalies C and E which may be along strike (as indicated by magnetic trends) and change from zinc rich to copper rich. This may be due to the presence of a partially assimilated sulphidic paragneiss inclusion which being zinc-rich would reflect in the soils and could cause accumulation of nickel (-(-copper?) in the adjacent norite. The concentration of sulphides by contamination of mafic magmas is well documented (see, for instance, McBirney, 1979).

Although rock samples 3028 and 3029 contained anomalous copper and nickel, soil collected in the area of these two samples did not return elevated values. The reason for this is not known but may mean the mineralization is quite restricted or the wide sample spacing could not detect this type of mineralization. A further series of samples at closer spacing could resolve this problem.

Conclusions

The current program resulted in identification of many more areas of paragneiss than previously indicated by Friedman (although Hudson Bay Exploration's drilling suggested this) and indicated that they are not related to a simple "fault bounded block" (Friedman, 1957).

The geological mapping also discovered an area of copper/nickel mineralization close to the pyroxenite on the east side of Deep Bay. Disseminated chalcopyrite and pyrrhotite are seen and anomalous copper and nickel obtained in grab samples.

The soil sampling program identified at least two priority target areas (Anomaly A and Anomaly C-E) in the northern part of the property which seem wormy of follow-up sam pling and prospecting.

At least one airborne magnetic feature seen on Noramco's map was discovered to be related to massive pods of magnetite in the norite. Other features have unknown causes but some, at least, must have similar origins.

A weak magnetic anomaly associated with soil anomaly A is of interest and should be considered during any follow-up program.

Recommendations

Detailed soil sampling and prospecting should be carried out on Anomaly A, Anomaly C-E, Anomaly B (to see if this relates to A) and along the eastern side of Deep Bay.

Line spacing should be reduced to 100 meters and sample spacing to 25 meters. This will result in approximately 3 kilometers of lines and about 100 soil samples. All out crops in the detailed area should be examined carefully and if mineralization is seen extensive ly sampled.

No further work is warranted in the southern part of the property to evaluate the paragneiss inclusions as only weak zinc values were obtained in the rocksampling and the soils did not indicate significant copper or nickel.

Cost Summary

Geological Mapping and Report PreparationServices 12 days (incl. G.S.T.) 54,494.00 Expenses including G.S.T. 51.233.07

Total 55.727.07

Soil Sample Collection 136 x 3.25 (incl. G.S.T.) 5476.00Soil Sample Analyses including G.S.T. 51,527.96

Rock Sample Analyses including G.S.T. 5266.75Total 52,270.71

Grand Total 57,997.78

Administration, Overhead (2096) 51.599.56

59,597.34

Bibliography

Coleman, A.P.; 1899: Copper in Parry Sound District; Ontario Bur. of Mines; Kept 8, Pt 2,p.259-262.

Coleman, A.P.; 1900: Copper and Iron Regions of Ontario; Ontario Bur. of Mines; Rept9, Pt l, p. 143-191.

Davidson, A., Culshaw, N.G. and Nadeau L.; 1982: A Tectono-Metamorphic Framework for Part of the Grenville Province, Parry Sound Region,Ontario; in Current Research, Part A, Geological Survey of Canada Paper 82-1A, p. 175-190.

Friedman, G.M.; 1957: Structure and Petrology of the Caribou Lake Intrusive body, Ontario, Canada; Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, Vol. 68, p.1531-1564.

Gibson, T.W.; 1909: Statistical Review; Ontario Bureau of Mines; vol. 18, Pt l, p. 5-70.

Hawkes, H.E., and Webb, J.S.; 1962: Geochemistry in Mineral Exploration. Harper and Row.

Levinson, A.A.; 1974: Introduction to Exploration Geochemistry. Applied Publishing, Calgary.

McBirney, A.R.; 1979: Effects of Assimilation; in The Evolution of IgneousRocks, edited by H.S.Yoder Jr., Princeton University Press; Princeton, NJ.

Rogers, W.R.; 1916: Statistical Review; Ontario Bureau of Mines; Vol. 25, Pt l, p 1-51.

10

Certificate

THAT, I graduated in 1972 with an Honors Bachelor of Science Degree from Brock Universi ty, St. Catherines, Ontario.

THAT, I completed two years post-graduate work at the University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.

THAT, I have practiced my profession continuously since 1974 with various mining and exploration companies and since 1984 as an independent consulting geologist.

THAT, I am a Fellow of the Geological Association of Canada.

THAT, I completed and supervised the referenced work and wrote the attached report.

THAT, I have no direct interest in the securities of Tylox Resources but have a Net Smelter Interest in the referenced property.

Dated this ^ day of October, 1991 at Oakville, Ontario.

mes R. Atkinson, FGAC

11

Appendix A:

Analytical ResultsandRock Sample Descriptions

12

Chemex Labs Ltd,Armlylkiil Chiirtsls ' Gixchtimisls ' Rogistorod Assayers

212 Brooksbnnk AVG . North Vancouver

To TYLOX RESOURCE CORPORATION

820 - 625 HOWE ST VANCOUVER. BC V6C 2T6

Pago Numbor 1 Toi-il P.-iqos 1 Cortihcaio Dato22-OCT-91 Invoice No 1-6123427 P O Number

IJJIP^*' iM"JS-y HHONh 004-004-0^21 Comments ATTN G SCHELL CC J ATKINSON

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

JO 4 JO 5 JO 6 JO 7 JO 8A

JO B H JO 8r JO 9 1020 J02 1

J022 J 02 J J024 J025 J026

J O2 7 JO2 B t O2 9

PEEP CODE

205 205 205 205 205

205 205 205 205 205

205 205 205 205 205

205 2O 5 205

'

294 294 294 294 294

294 294 294 294 294

294 294 294 294 294

294 294 294

Au ppbFA+AA

s r

l

i

< '

\ o

Ag ppm

< o . < o . < o . < o . < o .

< o .< 0 .f. 0 . < 0 .< 0 .

< o .( 0 . < 0 . < 0 . < 0 .

< o . < o .< 0 .

Co ppm

61 1 1

ft l 2

2

1 1 2 6

1 1 1 2

1 J 1 2 40

G 5

J B i 557

Cu

ppm

51 20 56

5 1 4

61 19

1 24 51 4 1

40 J 5 14 21 1 0

98 7 1 J 271

Fe

1.67 2.99 J . 52 1 . 2 J 1.91

J . 00 J . 24 5 . 0 J 5.04 4.70

4.51:* 1 1 . o o

J . J5 J . 00 2.68

5.12 J . 25 2. 7 J

Mn ppm

145 540 2 JOi to1 50

1 45 50

585 425 405

J95 505 J20 65 60

4451 4O 270

Mo

ppm

i i

8 1

1 1

1 8 J5

5 6 8

1 1( \ < 1

J 1 JO

1 2 < 1< 1

A91

Hi ppm

15 7

10 4

1 1

7 1 6 5

21 26

29 1 9 1 6 J 1 1 2

59 256 6 JO

23427

Pb ppm

( 2 < 2 < 2 < 2

26

< 2 28

< 2 8 4

< 2 1 0

< 2 4 2

2 < 2 < 2

Zn ppm

26 46 22'

J 6 44

1 56 20 56

1 16 1 92

290 :

68 1 4 58 1 0

-42 1 2 1 4

Appendix B:

Soil Sample Analytical Results

Chemex Labs, Mississauga, Ontario

13

Chemex Labs Ltd,Analylknil Chtmsls Gciiiftirrisls ' RiHji

212 Brouksbiink Avo , North Vnncouvor British Columbia, Canndn V7J 2C l PHONE 604-904-0221


020 - 625 HOWE ST VANCOUVER. B C V6C 2T6

Projocl CARIBOUCommonls ATTN G SCHELL CC J ATKINSON

P;i(|o Nuinhor l T(ii.-il P;i()cs 4 Corlilio;ii(; D;ilo22-OCT-QI liwok:o No l D123426 P O Numtxir


SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

1 N SSN 11 1 1 0 0 NMill 20 ONMill 10 ONN li 1 1 7 3 N

N 1) 1 , 1 0 0 SNHl, 300SN li 1 6 0 0 SN 1) 1 , 7 0 0 SMill 8 0 0 S

Sill. OOOWSill, 1 OOWSill 2 OOWSill. 100 WSBI 400W

SIM 3 OOWSill 6 OOWSill 7 OOWSill. '100 WSHI. i 000 W

SHI, 1 1 OOWI.OS OOOKI.OS 100EI.OS 200 EAi.os 2001:11

I.OS 100Mi.os 400I-:i.os 500I-:I.OS 60 OKi.os loow

I.OS iOOWI.OS 400WIOW 10 ONLOW (0 ONI.OW 40 ON

I.2N 100 i:I.2N IOOWI2N i OOWI.2N 400WI.2N 3 OOW

PEEP CODE

20 120 120 120 120 1

20 120 120 120 120 1

20 120 120 120 120 1

20 120 120 120 120 1

20 120 120 120 120 1

20 120 120 120120 1

20 120 120 120 120 1

20 120 I20 120 120 1

2382 382 iB2 iB2 iB

2 382 182 )82 182 18

2 182 182 182 (82 18

2 IB2 182 IB2 IB2 18

2 IB2 182 182 182 18

2 182 IB2 IB2 182 18

2 1 82 182 182 182 18

2 182 182 1 82 182 18

Au ppbFA-t-AA

10< 5< 3< 3< 3

< 3< 3

3< 3< 3

< 3101 0

< 33

3< 3

31 0

< 3

< 3< 3< 5< 3

3

1 03

< 3< 3< 3

53

< 33

< 3

< 33

< 3< 3v 3

Ag ppm

< 0.5< 0.3< 0.3< 0.3< 0.3

< 0.3< 0.3< 0.3< 0.3< 0.3

< 0.3< 0.3< 0.3< 0.3< 0.3

< 0.3< 0 .3< 0.3< 0.3< 0 .3

< 0.3C 0.3C 0.3< 0.3( 0.3

< 0 .3< 0.3< 0.3< 0 .3< 0.3

< 0.3< 0.3< 0.3< 0.3< 0.3

< 0.3< 0.3< 0.3< 0.3< 0.3

CO

ppm

1431 21 6

d3

61 1231 61 8

t(.8

1 38

88O33

j |670 )

71 1

40

24

•J101 0

63

70

1 o1 2

*

Cu ppm

10B

13(t8

26

1 11 11 1

|8i

1 01

82633

oo4O

K)

1 0726

1 2

1 7| |

242

61 1

208447

1 t

Fe%

7 .90i . 0 12.741.711 . 40

2.162.814 . 601.134 . t 'J

0 . O 22.621 .621.162 . J'J

2 . 072.41t . 2B1.072 . 22

2,101 . 1 12.2')1 .302.06

1 .742.731.321.013.21

6.231 . 0 O2.011.682.66

2.624.821 . 1 R2 . 002 . H t

Mn ppm

6050460230

OO1 1 3

1602302034431 70

RO1 40140323263

1 801 431 409383

2031602 1 3

1 43270

03RO

1 1 O1 K)

1 3 3 3

8231 103

1 632001 23

1 601 331 1 30303

Mo ppm

lc l

2|1

<<

v<(<<

<<*<<

<<<<

<

1 22

< 1< |< |

11

<l

* 1

A91

Hi ppm

24l o701 1

8

1 4

2 11 f)1 o

41 11 1271 7

1 6O

1 O1 11 1

1 21 11 42 11 2

1 0ORO

1 1

d1 0

(lo

1 O

1 21 1

1 r>'>1 4H

1 1

23426

Pb ppm

242

< i24

4444R

26

< 2< 2

2

R4422

< 2< 2

228

2624

1 0

d2(,26

d42

\ 4c 2

Zn ppm

1261 0872324(i

3020Bl 02

'12HO

107 238

1 24•J d

3272(,22860

68\26060

1 30

r, 2743074

1 30

8288024432

828R

1 04'HI44

Chemex Labs Ltd,Analytical CfwTrtsls ' 6m icherrtols ' Rmjtelunxl Assnytirs

212 Brooksbank Avo . North Vancouver



Pago Numbor 2 Total Pagos 4 Cortihcalo CCilo22-OCT-9l Invoice) No l B123426 P O Numhor

M^mX&lLS*^ British Columbia, Canada V7J2CI Proiocl CARIROU ppradlgP*' PHONE 604-984-022. Commonls: A^N G SCHELL CC J ATKINSON

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS A9123426

SAMPLEDESCKIPTIOH

I2N 700W1 2N BOOW12S 10 OFI2S 200 f:1, 2 S iOOK

1.2 s -4001:1 2 S 5001:i. 2 s 600 1:I2S 7 00 1i 2s HOU i:

1.2 S 200Wi.j s loowI.2S -100 W1.2 S 500WI2S 60 OW

I.2S 700WI.2S 800WI.2W 1 OON1.2W 200NI.2W iOON

I.2W 400NI.2W 500NI.2W 600NI.4N 1001I.4N 2001:!

l,4N JOOE1 JN IOOWL4N 200WI 4N i 00 WL.4N 400W

1,4N 500W1, 4 S IOOF1, 4 S 20OEI.4S JOOFI.4S 400F

I,4S 5001:i.4s 60ot:1.4S IOOWI.4S )50W1 4S 400W

PEEPCODE

20 120120 120120 1

20 120 120 120 1JO 1

20 120 120 120 120 1

20 120 120 120 1201

20120 120 12020

20 120120120120

2020202020

2020202020

2 IB2 IB2)82 1 82 ( 8

2 )82 I B2 182 tflJ 18

2 tfl2 182 182 {82 18

2 182 t82 182 182 )8

2 182 (82 182 )82 18

2 )82 1 82 182 i82 (B

2 IB2 )82 )B2 )B2 IB

2 182 1 82 IB2 IB2 IB

Au ppbFA i- AA

< 5< 5< 5( 5< 5

< 5<<<k

<C<<<

<<<

<

<<<<<

< 5< 5< 5C 5C 5

< "5C "5

1 0< 5< 5

C 5K)

< 5< "5< 5

Agppm

< 0.5< 0.5< 0.5< 0.5< 0.5

< 0 .< 0 .< 0 .< 0 .v 0 .

4 O .

< 0 .< o .< 0 .< o .

< 0 .< 0 .< 0 .< 0 .< 0 .

< o .< 0 .< 0 .< o .C 0 .

< 0 .< 0 .< 0 .< 0 .< 0 .

< 0 .C 0 .

< 0 .< 0 .< 0 .

< 0 .< 0 .< 0 .< 0 .< 0 .

Coppm

858

1 07

5fid4

1 0

81 4

81 0

7

y1 4

71 1

5

261 i

4)

5 )

64

1 5fi4

22fi

1 06

25

*)

8854

Cuppm

1 074

i Jfi

J4447

41 01 21 1

8

1 82 i

4fi

1

1 O2

1 45

1 O

22

) 116

6

9245t4

t5522

Fe?6

J . 5 JJ . 072 . 044.252.0)

2.001 . 542 . 0 V1 . B')2 . (10

2 . 2BJ . 042 . 27t . 402.16

1.142 . 8 l1 .1162 . 181.6)

t . 'J 8t . 884 . 420.7)1 .29

2.022 . tO4.102.211 .74

2.091.804.211.8)2 . 6 'J

1.46t . 2 t1.912.051.51

Mnppm

8070

74521 5205

1 001 601 501 1 5105

957701 552001 15

2 101 5520 O170175

5201 25205

701 25

14590

1 801 05

80

1 85200I 601 75I 70

6651 452001 60

9 O

Mo

ppm

<<<<<

<<<(<

L<

<<<

<<

<<

<<<i<

<<<(<

<c*.

s

Hippm

2|1

r

4

71 21 1

622

1 2K)1 (i

)

1 1

4151 21 0

7

K)45tt

1 5

109

5425

8

1 42t 6

tt21

12M

9

H

Pbppm

< 28422

22446

26224

< 22242

24

4022

22446

< 2( 2

42

< 2

< 224

< 22

Znppm

7814

1 204664

60507048B6

661 1 8

566256

666874

1004B

15(l72

1222050

1856804610

7676826694

54BB567840

Chemex Labs Ltd,Analytic! Chunsls ' GIN Kiiernsls " Rtxjislcrtxl Assiiyufs

212 BrooksbankAvo , North Vancouver British Columbia, Canada V7J 2C l PHONE 604-984-0221

To: TYLOX RESOURCE CORPORATION


Project : CARIBOUCommonls: ATTN: G SCHELL CC: J ATKINSON

Pago Number 3 Total Pagos 4 Cortificaio Dalo22-OCT-6l lnvok:i)N(i 19123426 P O Numhor


SAMPLE DESCBIPTIOH

1 4S 100W1 4 S 60 OW1 4S 700WI.4S BOOM1 4W IOON

I.4W 200NI 4W -IOONI.4W IOON1.4W 600NI.4W 6 ION

1.6 S lOOt1.6S 2001:i , 6 s t o o i :1.6 S 400i:1.6 s 100 1:

i.6s 6001-:1. 6 S 7 00 F:1.6 S IOOWI.6S 200WI.6W IOON

L6W 200NI.6W tOONI.6W 400N1,6W IOONl.()W GOON

I,6W 610NL6W 700Ni, e s 1001:1,8 S 200 1'L 8 S 1 0 0 E

1. 8 S 400 Ei. as 100Ei, 8 s 60 OF:i. aw IOONi aw 200N1 HW 100Nl.BW 40 ONl.BW IOON1.8W 110N1 BW 600N

PEEP CODE

20 l20 120 l20 120 1

20 120 120 120 120 1

20 120 120 120 120 1

20 120 120 120 120 1

20 120 120 120 1201

20 120 12012020 J

2020202020

2020202020

2 182 182 182 182 18

2 182 182 (82 182 18

2 (rt2 182 182 182 IB

2 182 182 IB2 182 IB

2 IB2 182 IB2 IB2 18

2 182 IB2 182 182 18

2 182 182 182 IB2 18

2 182 182 182 IB2 18

Au ppbFA-l-AA

< 1< l< 1< 5< 1

< 1< 5< 1< 1< 1

<<

<

<<<<<

<<<

<

< 1< 1< 5< 1

1

< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1

< 1< 110^

^

Ag ppm

< 0.1< o .< 0 .< 0 .< 0 .

< 0 .< 0 .< 0 .< 0 .t 0 .

< 0 .< 0 .< o .< o .< 0 .

< 0 .< 0 .< 0 .< 0 .

0 .

< o .< 0 .< 0 .< 0 .< o .

< 0.1< 0.1< 0.1< 0.1< 0.1

< 0.1< 0.1< 0 .< 0 .< 0 .

< 0 .< 0 .< 0 .< 0 .< 0 .

Co ppm

1299

1 -17

7988

21

61 71

1 87

7a67

70

161 11 191

76

122 16

46169

| |61^1

Cu ppm

a221 0104

4t7f

1

1

91

6742

20

1 11 11 1

•16

1 866

| 11

16227

1 41 0

119

Fe

1.411.891.881.011 .96

1 . 172.181.102.092.42

1.772.161 . 441 . B 62.17

2.161.981.791.892 . 6 9

1.811 . 484.892.211 . 90

J . 802.972.112.061 . OB

1.111.411 . 862.813 . 2 9

2.612 . 872 . 061.112 . 26

Mn ppm

20177128190

1 10

2B14001 401 611 11

1 404 1 11 711 111 K)

1 712712111 70

1080

1904101 012 6 11 71

9091

2 10280221

lil9061

1 1 1121

41071708181

Mo ppm

28

<

<

<c

<<

<<<<<

<<<<c

<

<

<

<<

c<<c<

<<(<<

A91

Hi ppm

i7

1 ')2 11 2

1 4B

1 01 421

61 71 020l 1

1 61 ')1 02011

1 1261 21 81 0

221 1•t

1 drj

1 21 17H

1 6

2-4l 1

r,

71 ()

23426

Pb ppm

d•tii2

2642.2

62

< 222

4B424

2(,44

1 2

1 06d26

6< 2

tt68

•42424

Zn ppm

9 2l \2428664

1 274167014

4476427014

1264B210

1 1 B

1061 1 R74B 670

8416908260

44441866•J B

BO68126016

Chemex Labs Ltd,ill Churmsls " GtMchtHTisls ' RtHjislerixl Ass;iy*?rs

212 Brooksbank Avo.. North Vancouver

PHONE 6C


820 - 625 HOWE ST VANCOUVER. BC V6C 2T6

Project : CARIBOUComments: ATTN G SCHELL GC: J ATKINSON

Paijo Numbor 4 Tolal Prujos 4 Ccrfilicaic Dali,'22 OCT-91 Invoice; No IDI23426 P O Numliur

SAMPLE DESCBIPTIOH

l.BW 70 ONI. OW IOON

. OW 20 ONOW IOONOW 400N

OW 50 ONOW 600NO W 7 0 0 N2W 20 ON2W IOON

2 W 4OON2W 50 ON2W 60 ON2W 700N2W 80 ON

1 1 2W 'KION

PEEP CODE

20 120 120 120 120 1

20 120202020

202O202020

20 1

2 182 182 182 182 18

2 182 182 182 182 18

2 IB2 IB2 IB2 IB2 IB

2 IB

Au ppbFA+AA

< 5< 5< 510

< 5

((<

1'

<<V

< 5

Ag ppm

< o .< o .c o .< o .< o .

< 0 .< 0 .< 0 .< o .< 0 .

< 0 .

Co ppm

,,6()

1 117

751 ')47

1 1

i)

< 0 . i 17< 0 .< 0 .< 0 .

t 0.5

1 25

1 1)

8

C

Cu ppm

2644

1 82 'J

141 1

16

1 0

11 i1 51 l1 0

B

jERTiFic)Fe

5.481 . 642.104.026.75

4.71) . ft')1 . 872 . 472.65

2.751.8')2.051 . ') 51.81

2.71

\TE OF A

Mn ppm

551 15220200t 1 0

(5601210

1 1 5205280

801 1 01 60")5

280

1 1 5

NALYSIS

Mo ppm

,,< ii i

21

j5

A91

Hi ppm

1 51 17

1 51 ')

5 **1 l)

< 1 Bt 1^ 1

,; |^ 1< i< 1< 1

^ 1

1 (i27

41 4451 57

23426

Pb ppm

82262

88444

62

< 2< 2

4

4

Zn ppm

1458467684

2862244268

1 O 6

101 1 0881284

74

vC/ b

hr\J-Ov~*y^y QCT) VVJ

l

" ^V ^^

r

-X^-TMb^ovV VyvfOAJ^ - Ty*-^^y ^71/ ITYO^vATW

~*Y^*"Cr

Z -vj-^vr? f?T^-f oxz^t/v/ 7?**!?! *^j

•^^-z/v? oeyT^kro^oj ~ir\ -^^(/^y-^o ^

-xij

Oy(o1 M J

-j cy *^ -'0 o**~v\p

'

~ffY^w J 5 zo-*zy^ - V?ic^xxsw (7^1

0-W50W ^v^ywy ^4^7 rvj TVT-A^/^y -vy^^na

S/

c, 2

mixed hordwood \

( 1 097427

/I09I77I i

fJi'\\ r.c...? Vimixed l hardwood

J .... )

2. /j\ f.'.--' *N .——,——

'p&'py^

r 'j,/Q li 1.4 6 s/''J "Spc^H J ^J^'v ^

flty

^. '•••'^ll--'i ,-

\\

b \\' 'l l^

5N

4N

3N

2N

IN

South Base Line

41H16NE0002 OM91-154 MCCONKEY

L4N

L2N

LOO

L2S

L4S

L6S

L8S

o

LEGENDLITHOLOGY

Norite(3) Anorthosite inclusions(2) Paragneiss inclusions

Paragneiss (quartz-biotife-graphite gneiss)

Mafic Pegmatoid

Granitic Pegmatoid

Pyroxenite

q.v. - quartz vein, myl - mylonite

STRUCTURE

J2*—r Shearing 7 mylonitic fabric

^^ Foliation in paragneiss

MINERALIZATION

po - pyrrhotite cp - chalcopyrite

py - pyrite mt - magnetite si - silicification

SYMBOLSLakeshore, stream, swamp

Claim post located, unlocated

Grid line with 100m stations -t

OutcfopChip sample location and number

Stream sediment sample ssi

a

30I8.

too 200 300 400 500m

Scale 1cm ^ 50m


CARIBOU LAKE PROPERTYMcconkey Township, Ontario

GEOLOGICAL MAPPING

James R. AtkinsonGeological Consultant

SCALE 1=5000October 1991

DWG. No. l

200

9N

8N

7N

6N

5N

4N

3N

2N

IN

-rlO i A *' i j* f W/-

•A' -' i'/1097428

— ^7

^

J y *s * \X ic * ^

1091772 .5 .

y,?

South Base Line

L4N

L2N

LOO

L2S

CAR l BO U

L4S

L6S

L8S

cui^

LEGEND

ot

100 200 300 400l

500m

Scale 1cm = 5 0m



SpIL GEOCHEMISTRY Ni-Cu

Anomalies identified


SCALE l-'5000October I99IDWG. No. 2.

41H18NE0002 OM91-154 MCCONKEY 210

{ 1097427

LEGEND

S1097450

Scale 1cm ^ 50m

CAR l BOU

TYLOX RESOURCES CORP.South Base Line a

LA K E CARIBOU LAKE PROPERTYMcconkey Township, Ontario

SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY Pb-Zn

Anomalies identified

James R. AtkinsonGeological Consultant DWG. No. 3

41H16NE0002 OM91-154 MCCONKEY

L220

9N

\\** —-Z?— —

CAR l BOU

8N

7N

6N

5N

4N

3N

2N

IN

South Bose Line i

I7H16NEM520MM-W MCCONKEY230

L4N

L2N

LOO

L2S

L4S

L6S

L8S

LEGEND

ot: 100—l— 200t

300l

400l

500m

Scale 1cm ^ 50m



SOIl. GEOCHEMISTRY Aut-Mo


SCALE 1=5000October 1991DWG. No.

caribou lake property location and access (fig. 1)€¦ · property geology (map 1) as mentioned...

Documents