carbon financing structures accra final
TRANSCRIPT
CDM – Carbon Finance Workshop
Accra, June 24-26 2009
CDM – Carbon Finance Workshop
Session 6: Discussion of carbon
financing structures
Contents
• Introductory quiz
• Carbon financing explained
• Key terms covered
• Case study
10
30
2
• Case study
• Major concepts explained
• Some special cases
• Group work
• Report back and key learning
30
30
Introductory quiz
Carbon financing analogyQuestion
• Would you finance a power project which • Then why would you finance an emission
• Without any additional information, would
you buy shares in Afrocentric on the
Johannesburg Stock Exchange?
• Then why would you expose yourself to
carbon market price risk without a sufficient
understanding of the market
3
• Would you finance a power project which
has signed a power purchase agreement
with a new company with no assets?
• Then why would you finance an emission
reduction project which has signed a carbon
offtake agreement with a high counterparty
risk player?
• Would you invest in a project based on a
feasibility study conducted by a company
with absolutely no experience?
• Then why would you invest in a project
where all the carbon documentation has a
high chance of being incorrect to such an
extent that CDM registration fails
Contents
• Introductory quiz
• Carbon financing explained
• Key terms covered
• Case study
10
30
4
• Case study
• Major concepts explained
• Some special cases
• Group work
• Report back and key learning
30
30
During this session you will learn about…
Key concept Definition
• ERPA • Emission reduction purchase agreement – the agreement
defining the terms of sale of carbon credits
• Fixed price ERPA • An ERPA in which a fixed price is paid for carbon credits,
irrespective of price fluctuations in the market
• Carbon share ERPA • An ERPA in which the price paid for carbon credits is linked to
some kind of market price metric
• Delivery guarantee • A guarantee provided by a project to a carbon credit buyer that
5
• Delivery guarantee • A guarantee provided by a project to a carbon credit buyer that
a minimum number of carbon credits will be delivered by the
project
• Counterparty • The carbon credit buyer with which the project signs the ERPA
• Upfront CDM costs • The costs incurred to register a project under the CDM.
Includes development costs (e.g. PIN, PDD), validation costs
and registration costs
• Upfront payments • Payments made by a carbon credit buyer to a project for
carbon credits not yet delivered
• Carbon fund • A fund which makes equity or debt investments into a project
on the basis of securing carbon credits as one of its revenue
streams
Case study: Energy production and methane avoidance from groundnut husks
Project description
• Ghana Groundnut Growers Association (GGGA) currently leaves husks in
large piles which decompose anaerobically, releasing methane
• Under the project, the groundnut husks will be fired instead of coal in a
boiler to produce energy, thereby reducing emissions of carbon dioxide
from the burning of fossil fuels
• By not allowing the husks to decompose anaerobically, the release of
methane will also be avoided
98
6
Estimated emission reductions(‘000 tCO2e)
Other• By examining similar projects in the UNFCCC pipeline, you find that these
types of projects deliver only 60% of methane avoidance emission
reductions on average
50 50 50 50505050
85
15
48
98
2016
Methane
avoidance
Fuel switch
17
67
13
26
76
14
35
2010
5
55
11
1060
12
252
The major carbon financing concepts explained:Advantages of a Fixed Price ERPA
A fixed price ERPA is an ERPA in which a fixed price is paid for carbon credits, irrespective
of price fluctuations in the market
Advantage Case illustration
• Hedge away carbon
market price risk and so
benefit if market
underperforms
• GGGA entered fixed price contract for carbon credits in
September 2008 for EUR14
7
Secondary
CER
market
price
ERPA price
The major carbon financing concepts explained:Disadvantages of a Fixed Price ERPA
A fixed price ERPA is an ERPA in which a fixed price is paid for carbon credits, irrespective
of price fluctuations in the market
Disadvantage Case illustration
• Forgo potential price
• GGGA enters fixed price contract for carbon credits in Sept 08
for EUR14 with Lucky Traders Ltd, a private carbon trader with
an insignificant balance sheetSecondary
CER
8
• Forgo potential price
upside
CER
market
price
ERPA price
• Potentially high
counterparty risk
• When the first credits are delivered, the market price is at
EUR8. Lucky Traders Ltd was planning to resell credits on the
market but now cannot afford to and declares insolvency
• The contract falls away at GGGA is forced to sell credits at
EUR8 to the market
The major carbon financing concepts explained:Advantages & disadvantages of a Carbon Share ERPA
A carbon share ERPA is an ERPA in which the price paid for carbon credits is linked to
some kind of market price metric
Case illustration
• GGGA entered carbon share agreement where they receive
80% of secondary CER market priceSecondary
CER
market
price
Advantage / disadvantage
9
price
ERPA price
• Share in performance • Share in price upside if market price increases, but also share
in downside if market price decreases
• Lower counterparty risk
• If price decreases, less financial strain is put on the carbon
credit buyer, reducing counterparty risk compared to a fixed
price agreement
The major carbon financing concepts explained:Which to choose: Fixed Price of Carbon Share?
A carbon share ERPA is an ERPA in which the price paid for carbon credits is linked to
some kind of market price metric
A fixed price ERPA is an ERPA in which a fixed price is paid for carbon credits, irrespective
of price fluctuations in the market
10
Recom-mendation
If:
• A fair fixed price can be secured, and
• Counterparty has a relative good credit rating
Then rather hedge away risk through a fixed price contract
Unless:
• You have studies the fundamentals of the market and are confident that
prices will increase, and
• You have the appetite and means to take on carbon market risk
The major carbon financing concepts explained:Advantages & disadvantages of a Delivery Guarantee
A delivery guarantee is a guarantee provided by a project to a carbon credit buyer that a
minimum number of carbon credits will be delivered by the project
Case illustration
• Lucky Traders Ltd realises that they cannot take on carbon
price risk and so decide to enter a back-to-back agreement to
sell GGGA’s credits on directly.
• However, in order to ensure that they can fulfill this contract,
Lucky Traders demands that GGGA provides a guarantee that
Advantage / disadvantage
11
Lucky Traders demands that GGGA provides a guarantee that
they deliver the estimated number of emission reductions.
• Potentially higher price • With a delivery guarantee, Primary CERs have similar risk to
Secondary CERs and should therefore fetch a similar price
• Multiplication of project risk
• If the project underperforms, GGGA will produce insufficient
ERs and will therefore have to spend cash to buy CERs on the
market when the performance from the project is worst.
• Potentially onerous non-delivery clauses
• Lucky Traders may insert a clause saying that ownership in
GGGA’s project cedes to Lucky Traders in the event of default.
We have seen this before – especially in cases like this where
the project is expected to underperform! Beware the sharks!
Recommendation Avoid delivery guarantees wherever possible!
The major carbon financing concepts explained:Advantages & disadvantages of various Counterparties
A counterparty is the carbon credit buyer with which the project signs the ERPA
Case illustration
• GGGA goes out into the market again and finds another
potential buyer: the Swiss Government
• GGGA checks with a credit rating agency and finds that the
Swiss Government has a rating of AAA and estimates that
Lucky Traders has a rating of D+
Advantage / disadvantage
• Lower carbon market • The lower the counterparty risk, the less likely that the ERPA
12
• Lower carbon market risk
• The lower the counterparty risk, the less likely that the ERPA
will fall through, and the less likely that the project will have to
go out into the market and be exposed to carbon market risk
• Higher value ERPA • Banks and other investors usually recognise the value of a
strong counterparty (as they do with power purchase
agreements) and so will be more likely to provide finance if
there is less counterparty risk
• Lower price • There is a misconception that stronger counterparties
recognise their value and offer lower prices as a result. This is
not the case – in fact all of South Pole’s buyers are AAA-rated
and offer above market prices
Recommendation Sign an ERPA with the strongest possible counterparty to
minimise risk
The major carbon financing concepts explained:Advantages & disadvantages of covering upfront costs
Upfront CDM costs are the costs incurred to register a project under the CDM. Includes
development costs (e.g. PIN, PDD), validation costs and registration costs
Case illustration
• GGGA is approached by Super Penguins Ltd, a carbon
developer which offers to cover all upfront costs and be paid a
commission on sale of credits on a no-cure-no-pay basis.
Advantage / disadvantage
• No cash flow requirement upfront
• The average CDM project costs EUR60-90k to register. These
upfront cash requirements can therefore be minimized by the
13
requirement upfront upfront cash requirements can therefore be minimized by the
project
• Reduced exposure to CDM risk
• If CDM registration fails, the project has not sunk upfront costs
which cannot be recovered
• Higher probability of CDM success
• The carbon developer is better incentivized to see the project
succeed. In fact, EB records show a strong trend that the
quality of projects developed under such an arrangement are
of far higher quality
Recom-mendation
Unless the project owner has a surplus of cash, if a fair carbon price is
offered, go for a contract in which upfront costs are covered
• Lower price • Carbon developers may discount price as a result of increased
risk covered
The major carbon financing concepts explained:Advantages & disadvantages of covering upfront costs
Upfront payments are payments made by a carbon credit buyer to a project for carbon
credits not yet delivered
Case illustration
• Big Bucks Ltd offers to pay GGGA 25% of pre-2012 carbon
credits upfront
Advantage / disadvantage
• Early cash flow • Upfront payment serves as an early cash flow to the project
which can be used to cover initial capital costs, raise financing,
14
which can be used to cover initial capital costs, raise financing,
etc
• Lower price • In order to compensate themselves for the additional risk, Big
Bucks Ltd is likely to offer a lower price than if credits were
sold on a regular fixed price contract
• Often onerous guarantees required
• Many buyers who are willing to provide upfront payments
require bank guarantees to do so. If a project is in a position to
get a bank guarantee, they can rather get a loan directly from
the bank
• To overcome this, South Pole and BP are aiming to provide
upfront payments secured by project assets
Recom-mendation
Upfront payments are often very useful for getting a project off the ground
if the terms for the security are realistic
The major carbon financing concepts explained:Advantages & disadvantages of carbon funds
A carbon fund is a fund which makes equity or debt investments into a project on the basis
of securing carbon credits as one of its revenue streams
Case illustration
• Platinum Carbon Capital offers to take a 25% equity stake in
GGGA’s project, in return for 25% of project returns (including
25% of carbon credits)
Advantage / disadvantage
• Access to capital • The presence of carbon credits allows a project access to
15
• Access to capital • The presence of carbon credits allows a project access to
potential investors who may not have been interested
otherwise
• Potential strategic partner
• As carbon funds invest in many related projects, they may
bring networks or expertise which are very useful to a project
• Potentially lower price • In order to minimize carbon market risk, a carbon fund may
assume a conservative carbon price when performing a
valuation on the project
Recom-mendation
Explore potential carbon funds if there is a funding gap in the project, but
ensure you are satisfied with carbon price assumptions
Contents
• Introductory quiz
• Carbon financing explained
• Key terms covered
• Case study
10
30
16
• Case study
• Major concepts explained
• Some special cases
• Group work
• Report back and key learnings
30
30
Case study: Mini-grid hydropower project in Ghana
Project description
• The Rural Hydro Company is in the process of developing a 10MW hydro
project to supply power to a mini-grid system in Ghana
• The project also involves the development of a mini-grid system, and will
supply power to homes, schools and hospitals in the region, reducing the
need for the diesel powered generators which are currently used
• The project is expected to commission in Sept 2010
• The project is eligible under methodology AMS.I.A under the CDM
17
Estimated emission reductions(‘000 tCO2e)
616161616161
15
201615141312112010
Case study: Mini-grid hydropower project in Ghana
• Substantial interest has been shown in the project by the global community
and as a result the Rural Hydro Company has been approached by 2
buyers with the following terms and characteristics:
Buyer name Swiss Government Conco
Credit rating AAA C
Probability of default Low price = 0%
Medium price = 0%
Low price = 50%
Medium price = 20%
18
Carbon financing terms offered
Medium price = 0%
High price = 0%
Medium price = 20%
High price = 10%
Fixed price offered
with no delivery
guarantee
EUR11 EUR12
Discount if upfront
costs covered
EUR1 None offered
Carbon share offered
no delivery guarantee
80% None offered
Case study: Mini-grid hydropower project in Ghana
External research
• You have commissioned an external consultant to do some external
research and have determined the following:
Low price Medium price High price
Price level EUR 5 EUR 11 EUR 16
Probability 25% 50% 25%
19
• If upfront costs are not covered, a CDM project has a 20% non-registration
risk
• If upfront costs are covered, this risk reduces to 5%
Questions to be answered
• What carbon financing structure would you recommend to the project? Be
specific in terms of:
• Buyer
• Fixed price or carbon share
• Upfront costs covered or not
Contents
• Introductory quiz
• Carbon financing explained
• Key terms covered
• Case study
10
30
20
• Case study
• Major concepts explained
• Some special cases
• Group work
• Report back and key learnings
30
30
Case study feedback
If a fixed price
• Option A: Swiss government: Risk adjusted price of EUR11
Price offered EUR11 EUR11 EUR11
Low price Medium price High price
Market price EUR 5 EUR 11 EUR 16
Probability 25% 50% 25%
21
price contract was chosen which buyer would you go for?
Chance of default 0% 0% 0%
Default risk adjusted price EUR11 EUR11 EUR11
• Option B: Conco: Risk adjusted price of EUR10.30
Price offered EUR12 EUR12 EUR12
Chance of default 50% 20% 10%
Default risk adjusted price EUR5.50 EUR11.80 EUR12.4
80% x EUR12 + 20% x EUR11
25% x EUR5.50 +
50% x EUR11.80 +
25% x EUR12.40
Case study feedback
Is the
• Option A: Swiss government: Risk adjusted price of EUR8.60
Price offered EUR4 EUR8.80 EUR12.80
Low price Medium price High price
Market price EUR 5 EUR 11 EUR 16
Probability 25% 50% 25%
22
Is the carbon share offer more attractive?
Chance of default 0% 0% 0%
Default risk adjusted price EUR4 EUR8.80 EUR12.80
EUR5 x 80% EUR4 x 25% +
EUR8.80 x 50% +
EUR12.80 x 25%
So far, the fixed price contract with the Swiss Government is the most attractive offer
Case study feedback
Should the upfront costs be covered in return for a EUR1 price discount?
• CDM risk adjusted price without upfront costs covered from the Swiss
Government is:
EUR11 x (1 – risk of non-registration) = EUR11 x 80% = EUR8.80
• CDM risk adjusted price with upfront costs covered from the Swiss
Government is:
EUR10 x (1 – risk of non-registration) = EUR10 x 95% = EUR9.50
23
EUR10 x (1 – risk of non-registration) = EUR10 x 95% = EUR9.50
Conclusion
• The project should enter into:
• Swiss Government
• Fixed price contract
• With upfront costs covered
Key learnings
Fixed price vs Carbon Share
If:
• A fair fixed price can be secured, and
• Counterparty has a relative good credit rating
Then rather hedge away risk through a fixed price contract
Unless:
• You have studies the fundamentals of the market and are confident that
prices will increase, and
• You have the appetite and means to take on carbon market risk
24
Delivery guarantee
Avoid delivery guarantees wherever possible!
Counter-party
Sign an ERPA with the strongest possible counterparty to minimise risk
Covering CDM costs
Unless the project owner has a surplus of cash, if a fair carbon price is
offered, go for a contract in which upfront costs are covered
Upfront payments
Upfront payments are often very useful for getting a project off the ground if
the terms for the security are realistic
Carbon funds
Explore potential carbon funds if there is a funding gap in the project, but
ensure you are satisfied with carbon price assumptions