caprie: clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischemic events purpose to assess the...
TRANSCRIPT
CAPRIE: Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at risk of Ischemic Events
Purpose
To assess the relative efficacy of the antiplatelet drugs clopidogrel and aspirin in reducing the risk of thrombotic events in patients with atherosclerotic disease.
ReferenceCAPRIE Steering Committee. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). Lancet 1996;348:1329–39.
CAPRIE: Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at risk of Ischemic Events- TRIAL DESIGN -
DesignMulticenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, parallel group
Patients19,185 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease (either recent ischemic stroke, recent MI or symptomatic peripheral arterial disease)
Follow up and primary endpointPrimary combined endpoint: ischemic stroke, MI or vascular death. Mean 1.9 years follow up.
TreatmentAspirin 325 mg once daily or clopidogrel 75 mg once daily
CAPRIE: Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at risk of Ischemic Events- TRIAL DESIGN continued-
Stroke
MI
Peripheral arterial disease
Patient subgroups
33.4%
32.9%
33.7%
Aspirin(n=9586)
33.7%
32.7%
33.6%
Clopidogrel(n=9599)
CAPRIE Steering Committee. Lancet 1996;348:1329–39.
CAPRIE: Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at risk of Ischemic Events- RESULTS -
• Annual event rate for primary endpoint of ischemic stroke, MI or vascular death significantly reduced in clopidogrel group compared with aspirin (5.32 vs. 5.83%, p<0.043)
• Effect of clopidogrel compared with aspirin indicated that benefit may not be identical between subgroups (p=0.042 for test of heterogeneity):
— reduction in event rate was significant in patients with existing peripheral arterial disease
— reduction in the group with previous stroke, though not significant
— increased event rate in the group with previous MI, though not significant
• Clopidogrel was well tolerated as defined by withdrawal rate from trial: only marginally higher vs aspirin (21.3 vs. 21.1%)
CAPRIE: Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at risk of Ischemic Events- RESULTS continued -
Months after randomization
Cumulativerisk (%)
00
6 12 18 24 30 36
5
10
15
20
CAPRIE Steering Committee. Lancet 1996;348:1329–39.
Aspirin
Clopidogrelp=0.043
Primary endpoint: stroke, MI or vascular death
CAPRIE: Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at risk of Ischemic Events- RESULTS continued -
Stroke Clopidogrel (6054)Aspirin (5979)
MI Clopidogrel (5787)Aspirin (5843)
Peripheral arterialdisease
Clopidogrel (5795)Aspirin (5797)
All patients Clopidogrel (17,636)Aspirin (17,519)
7.157.71
5.034.84
3.714.86
5.325.83
0.26
0.66
0.0028
0.043
Relative risk reduction (%)
7.3%(–5.7 to 18.7)
–3.7%(–22.1 to 12.0)
23.8%(8.9 to 36.2)
8.7%(0.3 to 16.5)
SubgroupTreatment group(patient years at risk)
Eventsper year(%)
pRelative riskreduction (95% CI)
Primary endpoint by subgroup
Aspirinbetter
Clopidogrelbetter
0–10–20 10 20 30 40–30
CAPRIE Steering Committee. Lancet 1996;348 :1329–39.
CAPRIE: Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at risk of Ischemic Events- RESULTS continued-
Patient years at risk
Stroke and MI
17,519
Aspirin
17,636
MI
Nonfatal
Fatal
270
63
226
49
Clopidogrel
CAPRIE Steering Committee. Lancet 1996;348:1329–39.
Stroke
Nonfatal
Fatal
430
32
405
33
CAPRIE: Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at risk of Ischemic Events- SUMMARY -
Compared with aspirin, in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease, clopidogrel:
• Reduced the primary combined endpoint of stroke, MI or vascular death in the total study population
• Conferred benefit in peripheral arterial disease and stroke subgroups
• Conferred no significant benefit in previous MI subgroup
CAPRIE: Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at risk of Ischemic Events- SUMMARY -
Compared with aspirin, in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease, clopidogrel:
• Reduced the primary combined endpoint of stroke, MI or vascular death in the total study population
• Conferred benefit in peripheral arterial disease subgroup• Conferred no significant change in risk in stroke and MI
subgroups