capital adequacy and basel reform

3
Capital Adequacy and Basel Reform Felicity Ann Youl Regional Head Compliance & Control BNP Paribas, Asia Pacific 30 November 2010

Upload: thisbe

Post on 05-Feb-2016

47 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Capital Adequacy and Basel Reform. Felicity Ann Youl Regional Head Compliance & Control BNP Paribas, Asia Pacific 30 November 2010. Some Quick facts about BNP Paribas. 201,000 employees across 84 countries - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Capital Adequacy and Basel Reform

Capital Adequacy and Basel Reform

Felicity Ann YoulRegional Head

Compliance & ControlBNP Paribas, Asia Pacific

30 November 2010

Page 2: Capital Adequacy and Basel Reform

Some Quick facts about BNP Paribas

201,000 employees across 84 countries Diversified business model across Retail, Corporate & Investment Banking and

Investment Solutions After CEBS stress test, buffer of over €20 Billion Gross Revenues €33.56 Billion/Net Income €6.293 Billion (for 9 months to 9/2010)

In the top 15 banks by market capitalisation (€80 Billion)

Common equity tier 1 ratio 9% / tier 1 ratio 11.2% (at 30/9/10)

ROE 13.2% for 9M 2010 (at 30/9/2010)

AUM of €887 Billion (at 30/9/2010)

RWA €608 billion (at 30/9/2010)

One of only 6 banks in the world rated AA or above 6th most important global banking brand

(English Brand Finance Magazine)

-20

84 -40

12

2724

€bn 21

30.06.10 Basel 2.5 Basel 3 Total

Counterparty Operational

Credit Market / FX / Equity

* Estimates based on 30/6/10 balance sheet & current information concerning planned Basel 2.5 & 3 regulations

144

RWA - Capital MarketsEstimated* Basel 2.5 & 3 impact

Page 3: Capital Adequacy and Basel Reform

BNP Paribas’ Operational Risk Approach

• The cornerstone of the BNPP model is the potential incidents • Selection of scope:

– Key business processes analysis,– Identification of the potential incidents, – Selection of the most important in terms of financial impact.

• Detailed analysis of those potential incidents:– Qualitative: Analysis of the causes, controls, effects and quantification factors,– Quantitative: Frequency and severity assessment of two cases (Likely and Worst).

• Historical internal and external incidents are used to back test our prospective analysis and ensure its completeness and accuracy.

• The incidents output data (frequency, severity) are modeled by distribution laws.• Capital is derived from simulation of annual aggregated losses resulting from modeled incidents.

3

The Group Capital Calculation Model

Potential Incidents

Calculation engineDistributions

Simulations

Annual aggregated

losses

Capital

External data

Historical incidents

Analysis•Risk Assessments

•30 majors Scenarios

Direct useDirect use

CompletionCompletion

Indirect UseIndirect Use

Indirect UseIndirect Use

CompletionCompletion

Common risks

Extreme risk

Potential Incidents

Calculation engineDistributions

Simulations

Calculation engineDistributions

Simulations

Annual aggregated

losses

Capital

Annual aggregated

losses

Annual aggregated

losses

Annual aggregated

losses

CapitalCapitalCapital

External dataExternal data

Historical incidentsHistorical incidents

Analysis•Risk Assessments

•30 majors Scenarios

Direct useDirect use

CompletionCompletion

Indirect UseIndirect Use

Indirect UseIndirect Use

CompletionCompletion

Common risks

Extreme risk Quantitative analysisQualitative analysis

Causes Controls LIKELY CASE

WORST CASE

Description FrequencyEffects

Potential IncidentPotential Incident

Severity

Description Frequency SeverityEvent

Process

Quantitative analysisQualitative analysisCauses Controls LIKELY CASE

WORST CASEWORST CASE

Description FrequencyEffects

Potential IncidentPotential Incident

Severity

Description Frequency SeverityEvent

Process