candidates’ performance in the 2009 examination – paper 1

33
Candidates’ Performance Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1 Paper 1 Mr. WAN Shiu-kee Mr. WAN Shiu-kee

Upload: blade

Post on 28-Jan-2016

44 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1. Mr. WAN Shiu-kee. Overall Performance. Satisfactory Possess broad understanding of the topics Able to give appropriate answers based on the scenarios given. Overall Performance. Should read the questions carefully - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

Candidates’ PerformanceCandidates’ Performancein the 2009 Examination – Paper 1in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

Mr. WAN Shiu-keeMr. WAN Shiu-kee

Page 2: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

2

Overall PerformanceOverall Performance

Satisfactory Possess broad understanding of the

topics Able to give appropriate answers

based on the scenarios given

Page 3: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

3

Overall PerformanceOverall Performance

Should read the questions carefully Should present their answers in a logical

and systematic manner Abbreviations are not acceptable Proper heading / title should be provided

for each account / statement Journal narratives should not be omitted Should show workings in their answers

Page 4: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

4

Overall PerformanceOverall Performance

Questions Popularity Performance

1Satisfactorily answered

2 Good

3 96.0% Well answered

4 35.7% Poor

5 68.3% Well answered

Page 5: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

5

Question 1 – Consolidated Question 1 – Consolidated financial statementsfinancial statements

Satisfactorily answered Well prepared for a question on

consolidated financial statements

Page 6: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

6

Question 1 – Consolidated Question 1 – Consolidated financial statementsfinancial statements

a) Poor Not able to explain the accounting

definition of goodwill in the context of consolidation

Wrongly focused on elaborating the difference between purchased goodwill and inherent goodwill

Did not understand the meaning of “attributing factors”

Page 7: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

7

Question 1 – Consolidated Question 1 – Consolidated financial statementsfinancial statements

b) Well answered Computation of goodwill should

include holding company’s share of ordinary share capital, share premium, pre-acquisition profits and fair value adjustments on office premises

Did not net off the pre-acquisition dividend from the cost of investment

Page 8: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

8

Question 1 – Consolidated Question 1 – Consolidated financial statementsfinancial statements

c) Not familiar with the adjustments relating to intra-group transactions

Mistakenly treated the mark-up as gross profit margin overstatement of cost of goods sold and understatement of gross profit

Could not identify the adjustments to be made to depreciation expenses depreciation on profit of the transferred machinery should be excluded, additional depreciation should be computed basing on the fair value adjustment of the office premises

Page 9: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

9

Question 1 – Consolidated Question 1 – Consolidated financial statementsfinancial statements

Failed to exclude intra-group management fees from administrative expenses

No difficulty in calculating goodwill arising from consolidation, but not familiar with the treatment of impairment loss on goodwill

Profit attributable to the equity holders of the parent and minority interest were to be shown separately

Page 10: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

10

Question 1 – Consolidated Question 1 – Consolidated financial statementsfinancial statements

Amounts of unrealised profit adjustment arising from upstream sale of machinery and additional depreciation on revaluation of office premises were to be apportioned to minority interest

Page 11: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

11

Question 1 – Consolidated Question 1 – Consolidated financial statementsfinancial statements

Should present the consolidated balance sheet in vertical form and classify various items under the appropriate headings

Did not adjust the net book value of PPE with the amounts of unrealised profits on machinery, fair value adjustments on office premises and the related depreciation

Page 12: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

12

Question 1 – Consolidated Question 1 – Consolidated financial statementsfinancial statements

Cash in transit should be shown neither as a separate item nor as a reduction of bank overdraft

Failed to deduct 2 years’ additional depreciation on fair value adjustment from retained profits

Ignored the depreciation adjustment on the transferred machinery from retained profits

Page 13: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

13

Question 2 – Partnership Question 2 – Partnership accountsaccounts

Good Quite familiar with the preparation of

various accounts for a partnership

Page 14: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

14

Question 2 – Partnership Question 2 – Partnership accountsaccounts

a) Confused the treatments of debit notes and credit notes

Rule of the lower of cost or net realisable value (LCN rule) should be applied to the valuation of closing inventories

Not aware that insurance expenses had been included in selling and administrative expenses

Wrongly calculated the allowance for doubtful debts basing on “confirmations received from trade debtors”

Returned cheques should be added to the balance of trade debtors

Page 15: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

15

Question 2 – Partnership Question 2 – Partnership accountsaccounts

b) Remember that no goodwill account was to be maintained in the books GW should be written off through partners’ capital accounts

No difficulty in recording the drawings of the partners but the full amount of the partners’ salaries had been credited to the capital accounts

Share of profits should be calculated after taking away the partners’ salaries from the net profit before appropriation

Page 16: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

16

Question 2 – Partnership Question 2 – Partnership accountsaccounts

c) Should transfer the book values of various assets to the realisation account failed to show the net amount of trade debtors and forgot to include the prepaid portion of the insurance expenses

Could not record the correct payment to trade creditors in the bank account

Ignored the share of realisation profits in recording the final settlement to the partners

Page 17: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

17

Question 2 – Partnership Question 2 – Partnership accountsaccounts

d) No difficulty in preparing the required journal entries

Mistakenly recorded the assets in the books of A&B Ltd at book values

Page 18: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

18

Question 3 – Cash flow Question 3 – Cash flow statementstatement

Well answered Demonstrated an acceptable level of

understanding in preparing a cash flow statement

Page 19: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

19

Question 3 – Cash flow Question 3 – Cash flow statementstatement

a) Not able to calculate the correct amounts of the depreciation of machinery and equipment as well as profit before taxation

Not aware that short-term investment was listed at fair value wrongly computed the profit on sale of investment

Had difficulties in calculating the valuation surplus on short-term investments for adjustment to net cash flows from operating activities

Page 20: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

20

Question 3 – Cash flow Question 3 – Cash flow statementstatement

Should classify interest paid as an operating activity and dividend income as an investing activity

Wrongly disclosed increase in fixed deposit as a cash flow from investing activities

Should not divide the proceeds from issuance of ordinary shares into par value and share premium and disclosed separately

Page 21: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

21

Question 3 – Cash flow Question 3 – Cash flow statementstatement

Did not notice the repayment in 2008 and the re-classification of bank loan at the end of 2007 and 2008

Fixed deposit with a maturity of 6-months was not to be treated as cash equivalents

Page 22: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

22

Question 3 – Cash flow Question 3 – Cash flow statementstatement

b) Fair Could not manage to explain 2

advantages of a cash flow statement to investors focused on stating the uses and classifications of a cash flow statement

Page 23: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

23

Question 4 – Ratios and ErrorsQuestion 4 – Ratios and Errors

Poor Could not apply conceptual

understanding in solving various accounting problems

Did not posses sufficient knowledge of some specific issues related to lease, provisions and intangible assets, etc

Page 24: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

24

Question 4 – Ratios and ErrorsQuestion 4 – Ratios and Errors

a) Could not calculate the return on equity and return on capital employed correctly wrongly used average profit figure instead of averages for equity and capital employed

Failed to include issued debenture in calculating opening figure for equity

Did not adjust debenture interest to net profit in computing return on capital employed

Page 25: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

25

Question 4 – Ratios and ErrorsQuestion 4 – Ratios and Errors

b) Gave comments only on the gearing ratio without giving proper reference to their answers in (a)

Failed to explain the implications of return on equity and return on capital employed to the shareholders of a highly geared company

Page 26: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

26

Question 4 – Ratios and ErrorsQuestion 4 – Ratios and Errors

c) Did not understand how to apply the concept of “substance over form” in the question tended to list the criteria of a lease as their answers

Page 27: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

27

Question 4 – Ratios and ErrorsQuestion 4 – Ratios and Errors

d) Not aware that the books had been closed recorded omissions and corrections directly to various expenses instead of profit and loss account

Had difficulty in calculating the amounts of lease creditors and finance charge for the year

Not able to prepare the necessary journal entries to recorded the lease

Page 28: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

28

Question 4 – Ratios and ErrorsQuestion 4 – Ratios and Errors

Should not record the construction cost of the fire exits as a liability

Failed to apply the matching principle to deal with the non-refundable rental premium and the accrued rent at the end of year 2008

Page 29: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

29

Question 5 – Non-profit making Question 5 – Non-profit making organisationorganisation

Well-answered Could identify the items to be shown

in the income and expenditure account and balance sheet

Page 30: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

30

Question 5 – Non-profit making Question 5 – Non-profit making organisationorganisation

a) Did not know how to work out the cost of goods sold from sales to star plan members mistakenly treated the margin as the mark-up in arriving at total amount of cost of goods sold

Did not account for stock loss when calculating operating expenses

Page 31: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

31

Question 5 – Non-profit making Question 5 – Non-profit making organisationorganisation

b) Had difficulty in calculating income from subscription fees forgot to allocate the star plan members’ subscription fees over a period of 3 years

Failed to apply the realisation principle in calculating revenue from wine tasting courses

Did not include the deposits for the function room as an expense in computing profit from annual dinner

Page 32: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

32

Question 5 – Non-profit making Question 5 – Non-profit making organisationorganisation

c) Could not manage to split deferred subscription fees into current and non-current portions and show them correctly in the balance sheet

Deferred course fees for January and February 2009 should be disclosed as a current liability

Page 33: Candidates’ Performance in the 2009 Examination – Paper 1

Thank you !Thank you !