canadian institute for recognizing learning rotterdam, 2014 1

28
CANADIAN INSTITUTE FOR RECOGNIZING LEARNING Rotterdam, 2014 1

Upload: patience-young

Post on 02-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

CANADIAN INSTITUTE FOR RECOGNIZING LEARNING

Rotterdam, 2014

1

PRESENTATION

•Two Theoretical Concepts

•Evidence Of Quality

• Implications For Practice

2

3

ASSESSOR LEARNING IS ALSO SITUATED

4

There are three kinds of people;

the ones that learn by readin’,the few who learn by

observation,And the rest who pretty much

have to pee on the electric fence for themselves.

(Will Rogers)

5

CONSEQUENTIAL TRANSITIONS

• Transfer is more of a transition• New learning is evitable • Changes individuals and their

relationship with a social practice• Requires support and time

6

7

Chances: Not So Good!

8

QUALITY IN VALIDATION

• Is tied to:a) the conditions of transition process

b) the supports it provides

c) the changes it engenders in individuals and institutions

10

“Why would I pursue when I know I'm not up to [the regulatory body's] standard? I am nothing … you are nothing, you're not qualified, I mean, so what happened to all the years that you've studied? What happened to all the knowledge that you had.? You're not qualified, you're not equivalent. You are nothing.”

11

BAARTMAN ET AL. (2006, 2007a, 2007b)

•Acceptability•Authenticity•Cognitive complexity•Comparability•Cost and efficiency•Educational consequences 12

BAARTMAN ET AL (2006, 2007a, 2007b)

•Fairness•Fitness for purpose •Fitness for self-assessment•Meaningfulness•Reproducibility of decisions•Transparency 13

Stakeholder Collaboration

14

Stakeholder Collaboration

15

VPL GOALS• Increase access• Improve persistence• Shorten programs• Reduce education costs• Promote confidence• Improve employability 16

17

Impact of Support

3.5 3.3 3.1 3.3

0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.0

Ave

rage

Gra

de

Average Course Grades

PLAR Learners’ PLAR Learners’ TRAD PLAR Learners’ PLAR Courses TRAD Courses Students’ Courses in Sample

Courses Programs

18

94%

6%

94%

6%

91%

9%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Percentage of Courses in which Learners & Students were Successful

PLAR Learners’ PLAR Learners’ TRAD Students’ PLAR Courses TRAD Courses Courses

19

11

26

11

20

9

18

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

PLAR Learners Candidats à la RAE

PLAR Learners in SamplePrograms Candidats à laRAE programmes choisis

TRAD Students Étudiants traditionnels

Average Number of Courses TakenNombre moyen de cours suivis

20

KEY OBSERVATIONS

Prior learning is situated learning; it may not simply transfer; it undergoes changes that constitute a transition necessary for performance in new contexts.

21

KEY OBSERVATIONS

Quality in PLAR may be more effectively developed if it is understood as a social construction, defined and implemented through engagement among communities in social practice.

22

KEY OBSERVATIONS

When learning is perceived as a transition and measures are taken to support that transition, the quality of assessments are enhanced and adults’ confidence as learners improves.

23

SOLUTIONS

•Collaboration•Designs that reflect our knowledge of prior learning

•Evidence•Financial resources 24

Contact Information

Joy Van KleefCanadian Institute for Recognizing

Learning (CIRL)www.cirl.org

[email protected]

SITUATED LEARNING“Why would I pursue when I know I'm not up to [the regulatory body's] standard? I am nothing … you are nothing, you're not qualified, I mean, so what happened to all the years that you've studied? What happened to all the knowledge that you had.? You're not qualified, you're not equivalent. You are nothing.” 26

Foundations for Quality Measures• Foundational principles• Engagement of stakeholders• Linking quality measures to purpose• Quality indicators beyond validity and reliability• Quality-specific policies and procedures• Fitness for purpose as basis for method and tool selection• Multiple methods of assessment• Quality-specific tools• Assessor and advisor training• Advising and support from pre to post-assessment• Integration of research, monitoring and evaluation• Innovative marketing 27

Specific Quality Strategies• Moderation• Team assessments• Mentors• Checklists to review tools• Resource development• Tool selection and development protocols• Surveys, focus groups, interviews• Evaluations for bias, validity, reliability• Internal and external audits• Longitudinal studies on candidate academic success 28