can figure f be included in such a right-angle triangle t that s(t) ≤ 2 s(f)? author: andrejs...
TRANSCRIPT
Can Figure F be included in such a right-angle triangle T that
S(T) ≤ 2S(F)?
Author: Andrejs Vihrovs, Riga, 2006
Research aims To prove the hypothesis:
Each plain figure F can be included in such
a right-angle triangle T that
S(T) ≤ 2S(F)
for as many convex shapes as possible;
To calculate the minimum of the ratio S(T):S(F); for some basic shapes: circle, regular triangle, regular hexagon.
BackgroundSome similar problems have been formulated and
solved in the book Шклярский Д. О., Ченцов Н. Н., Яглом И. М, Геометрические
оценки и задачи из комбинаторной геометрии, М., Наука, 1970, 384 c.
Prove that any plain convex figure having area 1 can be included into a parallelogram having area 2 as well as into a triangle having area 2.
Subsequently constraints on a triangle were added, namely it must be a right-angle triangle.
Mögling Werner, Über Trapezen umbeschriebene rechtwinklige Dreiecke, Wiss. Beitr. M.-Luther-Univ., Halle-Wittenberg, 1989, Nr. 56, 161-170.
TriangleLet a b c. Then the following arrangement
satisfies the required inequality
S(T)1 2
S(F)
a
b
c
Assumption:
b a
Optimal angle
QuadrangleThe estimation S(T) ≤ 2S(F) has been proved for
such quadrangles: squares, rhombs, parallelograms and trapeziums. The arrangement of parallelogram is shown below, but it is also useful for rhomb and square.
bsinaarctg
The ratio equals to 2.
a
b
TrapeziumThe arrangement for isosceles trapezium with a > b is
shown below. S(T):S(F) = 2.
Optimal angle
coscbsincarctg
a
b
c
TrapeziumArrangements for all the other types of trapeziums:
b d or a > d > b dcos
d
b
a
ad
b
a > d > b and b < dcos
Trapezium
d a and 0,5a b
d a > b > 0,5a and d 2bcos
d a > b > 0,5a and c ≤ 2bcos
b
d
a a
d
ba
bd
c
Regular polygonThe main idea is, firstly, to find the minimal right-angle triangle T including the circle. After having found T one determines all those regular polygons Fn fitting in this circle and satisfying
S(T) ≤ 2S(Fn).More precisely, it has been shown that
S(T) 3 2 21,855...
S(Circle)
0
n
S(T)2 10
S(F )n n
Calculation of n0:
223π2 n
sinn
Regular polygonThe arrangaments for the regular n-gons with
5 ≤ n ≤ 9 are shown below.
The value of the ratio S(T):S(Fn) is given below the picture.
5
1.8005... 6
1.9175...8
1.7588...
1.9437...
7
1.9068...
9
Minimum of ratioRegular triangle and regular hexagon
045
6
S(T) 12 13 31,917...
S(F ) 18
3
S(T)3
S(F )
Optimal angle
Conclusions
The proof for any trapezium has been obtained independently and by techniques other than those of Prof. M. Werner.
18
31312;3;
π
223
It has been proved that the inequalityS(T) ≤ 2S(F)
holds for all triangles, regular polygons and trapeziums.
The minimum of the ratio for the circle, the regular triangle and the regular hexagon are as follows: