California Standards Tests

Preliminary AnalysisAugust 2010

California Standards Tests

Administered annually in grades 2-11 Students receive scale score and

performance level on each test Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic

Results are strongly factored into state and federal accountability systems

English Language Arts

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

09 393.3 386.1 402.4 388.9 375 385.5 380.3 381.9 365.5 365.1 382.4

10 391 385 406.1 385.8 378.4 385.5 387.7 382 362.3 362.2 382.6

2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th AVG

ELA: Percent Advanced/Proficient

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

05 67% 67% 73% 69% 65% 67% 65% 72% 55% 54%

06 72% 64% 76% 69% 68% 69% 68% 67% 54% 46%

07 74% 63% 78% 71% 64% 71% 67% 69% 55% 53%

08 70% 68% 77% 73% 68% 72% 69% 70% 62% 54%

09 78% 73% 83% 78% 69% 77% 73% 72% 66% 60%

10 74% 71% 82% 78% 72% 74% 74% 73% 62% 59%

2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th

Mathematics

200.0

250.0

300.0

350.0

400.0

450.0

500.0

550.0

600.0

09 430.8 443.6 435.0 422.4 379.6 371.1 413.8

10 429.2 454.3 428.5 422.7 382.1 374.5 415.2

2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th AVG

Mathematics: Percent Adv/Proficient

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2nd 76% 84% 82% 84% 88% 82%

3rd 82% 81% 81% 82% 83% 86%

4th 73% 77% 81% 81% 87% 86%

5th 68% 70% 73% 71% 74% 76%

6th 66% 61% 56% 62% 63% 63%

7th 60% 59% 59% 62% 63% 65%

05 06 07 08 09 10

Secondary Math: Percent Adv/Proficient

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Algebra 1 41% 46% 49% 49% 42% 48%

Geometry 41% 33% 33% 36% 34% 32%

Algebra 2 35% 37% 39% 46% 39% 33%

Summative 51% 61% 55% 68% 65%

05 06 07 08 09 10

Academic Performance Index Estimates

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

09 928 876 865 911 841 939 882 970 870 875 854 847 812

10 ESTIMATE 938 854 845 905 850 923 877 971 877 887 839 875 812

AOE BV CHES Hope Jefferson Kelly Magnolia Pac RimPoinsetti

aAOM CHMS Valley CHS

Estimated API Change by School

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Estimated API Change '09 to '10

Change 10 -22 -20 -6 9 -16 -5 1 7 12 -15 28 0

AOE BV CHES Hope Jefferson Kelly Magnolia Pac RimPoinsetti

aAOM CHMS Valley CHS

Comparisons: ELA

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

Carlsbad 391 385 406.1 385.8 378.4 385.5 387.7 382 362.3 362.2

Coronado 394.4 383.2 416.2 387.9 394.1 401.7 396.6 392.3 382.6 379.3

Poway 398.9 383.4 414.4 398.5 392.4 395.6 394.5 389.7 373.9 370.7

San Dieguito 412.3 406.3 398.5 383.7 384.1

2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th

Comparisons: Math

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

Carlsbad 429.2 454.3 428.5 422.7 382.1 374.5

Coronado 427.1 448.1 434.1 414.7 384.9 380.3

Poway 431.8 445.3 425.7 439.3 402.1 377.4

2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th

Comparison: 8th Grade Algebra

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Carlsbad 88% 58% 51%

Coronado 70% 69% 48%

Poway 60% 68% 41%

San Dieguito 64% 91% 58%

% of Enrollment % Adv/Prof Combined

Comparison: 11th Grade Summative Math

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Carlsbad 36% 62% 22%

Coronado 37% 75% 28%

Poway 41% 70% 29%

San Dieguito 60% 60% 36%

% of Enrollment % Adv/Prof Combined

ELA by School: Scale Scores

ELA by School: Socio-Economically Disadvantaged Students

ELA by School: Parent Education

ELA by School: English Learners

ELA by School: Special Education

ELA by School: Hispanic Students

Math Scale by School

Math by School: Socio-Economically Disadvantaged

Math Scale by School: Special Education

Preliminary Conclusions

Carlsbad Unified remains a high-performing district

“Pockets of Excellence” exist at different levels

Changes in instructional practice are needed to move to next level of achievement

2009 Adequate Yearly Progress

Carlsbad Unified, Valley Middle School, and Carlsbad Village Academy are “on watch” for potential Program Improvement Status based on 2010 results.

Official notification to occur at end of August or early September

Year 1 Program Improvement Consequences

District Notify all parents Revise district plan

Includes approval from School Board and submission to California Department of Education

Use 10% of Title I funds for staff development Site

Notify all parents of school Revise school plan Use 10% funds for staff development Provide school choice with paid transportation District provides technical assistance (TA)

Initiatives for 2010-2011

ARRA Implementation of Read 180 literacy intervention at all

secondary schools iPod touch computing at Calavera Hills Elementary Flip Videos for identification of effective instructional

strategies Expansion of Distance Learning options for students Improve implementation of new math adoptions (K-8) Revamp Curricular Teams and build on momentum

from Summer Institute Involve students in assessment process

Continue College & Career Readiness Process Including support systems for AVID, EL, Special Needs

Additional Next Steps

Revise Single Plans for Student Achievement Districtwide focus on instructional strategies to

identify best practices and increase student engagement Leverage additional time for professional

development Staff Meetings Semester Break Day

Instruction for English Learners and Mathematics are additional areas of emphasis Title III Improvement Plan Partnership with SDCOE Math Experts