calcination behavior of different surfactant-templated mesostructured silica materials

29
Calcination behavior of different surfactant-templated mesostructured silica materials Freddy Kleitz, Wolfgang Schmidt, Ferdi Schuth * Max-Planck-Institut fur Kohlenforschung, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Platz 1, D 45470 Mulheim an der Ruhr, Germany Received 27 March 2003; received in revised form 15 July 2003; accepted 25 July 2003 Abstract The removal of the template by calcination from mesostructured M41S and SBA-type silica materials was studied by combining high temperature X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetry–differential thermal analysis and mass spectrometry, allowing detailed in situ investigations during the thermal treatment. A comparison was made between materials with different mesoscopic structures, resulting from different synthesis routes and chemical treatment. The in situ XRD studies showed a strong increase in scattering contrast observed for the low angle reflections occurring when the template is removed from the inside of the pores, irrespective of the type of mesostructure. In agreement with the XRD investigations, the TG–DTA/MS experiments proved that the removal of the surfactant is a stepwise mechanism. Marked differences in the scattering contrast variations and chemical reactions were observed depending on the syn- thesis conditions and the type of surfactant, which highlight the role of the silica–surfactant interfaces. MCM-41 and MCM-48 materials synthesized in the presence of alkyltrimethylammonium surfactant under alkaline conditions showed a template removal mechanism based on an Hofmann degradation at low temperatures, followed by oxidation and combustion reactions above 250 °C. On the other hand, acidic conditions employed for the synthesis of SBA-3 type materials seems to favor reactions of oxidations after the evaporation of water and hydrochloric acid at low temper- ature. In that case, large contraction of the hexagonal unit cell was usually observed. Most of the block-copolymer template is removed from SBA-15 at lower temperatures, in a single oxidation step. The SBA-15 framework possibly catalyzes the oxidation of the block copolymer template species. In addition, the presence of framework porosity or pore connectivities seems to be responsible for the strong scattering contrast variations observed below 250 °C. Re- sidual carbonaceous species and water are removed from the structure upon heating from 300 °C up to 550 °C. During this subsequent process a large contraction of the hexagonal unit cell is observed, possibly due to further framework condensation. In addition, a brief survey of the previous investigations reported in the literature related to the decomposition of structure-directing agents is given. Ó 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Mesoporous silica; MCM-41; MCM-48; SBA-3; SBA-15; Template removal; Scattering contrast; High temperature X-ray diffraction * Corresponding author. Tel.: +49-208-306-2373; fax: +49-208-306-2995. E-mail address: [email protected] (F. Schuth). 1387-1811/$ - see front matter Ó 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/S1387-1811(03)00506-7 www.elsevier.com/locate/micromeso Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29

Upload: sorescu

Post on 16-Jan-2016

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Chemistry

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

www.elsevier.com/locate/micromeso

Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29

Calcination behavior of different surfactant-templatedmesostructured silica materials

Freddy Kleitz, Wolfgang Schmidt, Ferdi Sch€uuth *

Max-Planck-Institut f€uur Kohlenforschung, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Platz 1, D 45470 M€uulheim an der Ruhr, Germany

Received 27 March 2003; received in revised form 15 July 2003; accepted 25 July 2003

Abstract

The removal of the template by calcination from mesostructured M41S and SBA-type silica materials was studied by

combining high temperature X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetry–differential thermal analysis and mass spectrometry,

allowing detailed in situ investigations during the thermal treatment. A comparison was made between materials with

different mesoscopic structures, resulting from different synthesis routes and chemical treatment. The in situ XRD

studies showed a strong increase in scattering contrast observed for the low angle reflections occurring when the

template is removed from the inside of the pores, irrespective of the type of mesostructure. In agreement with the XRD

investigations, the TG–DTA/MS experiments proved that the removal of the surfactant is a stepwise mechanism.

Marked differences in the scattering contrast variations and chemical reactions were observed depending on the syn-

thesis conditions and the type of surfactant, which highlight the role of the silica–surfactant interfaces. MCM-41 and

MCM-48 materials synthesized in the presence of alkyltrimethylammonium surfactant under alkaline conditions

showed a template removal mechanism based on an Hofmann degradation at low temperatures, followed by oxidation

and combustion reactions above 250 �C. On the other hand, acidic conditions employed for the synthesis of SBA-3 type

materials seems to favor reactions of oxidations after the evaporation of water and hydrochloric acid at low temper-

ature. In that case, large contraction of the hexagonal unit cell was usually observed. Most of the block-copolymer

template is removed from SBA-15 at lower temperatures, in a single oxidation step. The SBA-15 framework possibly

catalyzes the oxidation of the block copolymer template species. In addition, the presence of framework porosity or

pore connectivities seems to be responsible for the strong scattering contrast variations observed below 250 �C. Re-

sidual carbonaceous species and water are removed from the structure upon heating from 300 �C up to 550 �C. During

this subsequent process a large contraction of the hexagonal unit cell is observed, possibly due to further framework

condensation.

In addition, a brief survey of the previous investigations reported in the literature related to the decomposition of

structure-directing agents is given.

� 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Mesoporous silica; MCM-41; MCM-48; SBA-3; SBA-15; Template removal; Scattering contrast; High temperature X-ray

diffraction

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +49-208-306-2373; fax: +49-208-306-2995.

E-mail address: [email protected] (F. Sch€uuth).

1387-1811/$ - see front matter � 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

doi:10.1016/S1387-1811(03)00506-7

Page 2: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

2 F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29

1. Introduction

Ordered mesoporous materials [1,2] consist of

extended inorganic or inorganic–organic hybrid

arrays with exceptional long-range ordering,highly tunable textural and surface properties, and

controlled pore size and geometry. Typically, the

structure of the pores is periodic and the pore size

distributions are narrow with pore sizes ranging

between 2 and 50 nm, being known as the meso-

pore range. During the last decade, intensive sci-

entific efforts have been devoted to synthesis,

characterization and application of such orderedmesoporous materials [3–6]. Increasing knowledge

on mesoporous and mesostructured materials has

led to an almost continuous development of new

processes and techniques for synthesis and modi-

fication, which overcome previous limitations.

Ordered mesoporous materials are now thought to

find applications in fields as diverse as catalysis

[3,6,7], separation [8], delivery and release tech-niques [9], low-k dielectrics, sensors, and other

electro-optical technologies [10–13]. Nevertheless,

many aspects of the processes involved in prepar-

ing and developing valuable porous materials still

require greater insights. The present article is

concerned particularly with one of the most im-

portant aspects of ordered mesoporous materials,

namely the removal of the liquid crystal template,which is generally used to synthesize most of the

ordered mesoporous solids. Specifically, the aim of

this work is to provide some insights on the

physical and chemical processes involved in the

calcination of well-documented mesostructured

M41S [1,14] and SBA-type [15,16] silica materials.

Templating comprises the use of synthesis so-

lution and a template molecule or assembly ofmolecules. A template is generally described as a

central structure around which a network forms.

The cavity created after the removal of the tem-

plate should retain morphological and stereo-

chemical features of the central structure [17,18].

The generation of ordered mesoporous materials is

possible via templating by self-assembled liquid-

crystalline phases. When the material has reacheda sufficient degree of condensation, the templating

molecules are no longer needed and can be re-

moved to open the porous structure. Since some

composite mesophases can contain as much as

55% of organic material by weight, the removal

procedure of the organics is of utmost importance

in the preparation. Moreover, this step can con-

siderably alter the final properties of the desired

materials. Efficient template removal and faithfulimprinting have been shown to depend largely on

the nature of the interactions between the template

and the embedding matrix, and the ability of the

matrix to adapt to the template. Ideally, after re-

moval of the core molecules from the surrounding

matrix the shape of the voids that remain should

reflect the shape of the template.

The most common method used in laboratoriesto remove the template is calcination. In this

method, the as-synthesized materials are alterna-

tively heated in flowing nitrogen, oxygen or air,

burning away the organics. Any necessary charge-

compensating counterions are supplied from the

decomposition of organics. Usually, the heating

rates required are slow with heating ramps such as

1 �C/min up to 550 �C, followed by an extendedperiod of heating at a temperature plateau (4–8 h).

Calcination of as-synthesized mesophase contain-

ing large amounts of carbonaceous species can

leave carbon deposits or coke as a contaminant in

the porous materials, and pore blocking may oc-

cur. Generally, when the template is removed by

calcination, the low angle reflection intensities in-

crease, the structure may shrink, and the meso-scopically ordered structure could be dramatically

affected [19–21]. MCM-41 was originally calcined

at 540 �C in N2 for 1 h and then in O2 for 6 h [14].

The reported framework condensation increases

from Q3/Q4 of about 0.67 in the as-synthesized

MCM-41 precursor (29Si NMR data) to about 0.25

after calcination. Chen et al. [22] calcined MCM-

41 samples at 540 �C in air for 10 h with a slowheating rate (1 �C/min). They observed up to 25%

decrease of the unit cell constant depending on the

synthesis conditions, a fact that is in strong con-

trast with crystalline silicates which change very

little upon heating. The reported conditions for

calcination were found to vary widely. However, a

standard general procedure that can be used to

calcine mesostructured silica materials is per-formed under air at 550 �C for 5 h with a heating

rate of 1 �C/min. Thermogravimetry was used by

Page 3: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29 3

Chen et al. [22] to study the thermal behavior of

surfactant containing MCM-41 mesophase. They

recognized three distinct stages of weight loss: (1)

25–150 �C, due to the desorption of water; (2) 150–

400 �C, caused by combustion and decomposition

of the template, and (3) above 400 �C attributed atthat time only to water loss upon silanol conden-

sation. The first investigations on calcination were,

however, already described in the early report

from the Mobil scientists on MCM-41 [14]. They

studied the removal of the alkylammonium tem-

plate by thermogravimetric analysis combined

with temperature programmed amine desorption

analysis (TPAD). The measurements were carriedout on as-synthesized aluminum containingMCM-

41 from room temperature to 900 �C under a flow

of He with titration of the evolving base. They

observed two main weight loss maxima. The mo-

lecular weight of the decomposing species in the

low-temperature weight loss was calculated to be

312 g/mol, which is close to the sum of the mo-

lecular weights (283 g/mol) expected for decom-position of C16H33(CH3)3N

þ to hexadecene (224 g/

mol) and trimethylamine (59 g/mol). The amine

desorption analysis suggested the association of

C16H33(CH3)3Nþ with siloxy groups. The authors

proposed that since the siloxy groups are stronger

bases, they could promote the Hofmann elimina-

tion at lower temperatures. An important note is

that the Hofmann elimination of the structuringmolecules is commonly suggested in the cases of

zeolites such as MFI-type ones (ZSM-5 or silica-

lite-1) [23,24]. Parker et al. [25] proposed a general

mechanism for the thermolysis of the tetrapropy-

lammonium hydroxide that is occluded in the

zeolites with MFI structure. The first step of this

mechanism is the Hofmann elimination producing

propylene, tripropylamine and water. It is fol-lowed by successive b-eliminations. In addition,

depending on the framework structure and com-

positions, several other types of chemical reactions

may occur in porous solids (e.g. dehydroxylation,

decomposition, cracking, oligomerization, rear-

rangements) [26,27].

Corma et al. [28] carried out in situ IR studies

of the thermal desorption of the template between200 and 500 �C with a heating rate of 10 �C/min.

By increasing the temperature, they observed a

decrease of the interaction of the silanol groups

with the template molecules. Their analysis of the

organic fragments detected above 400 �C suggests

that part of the carbon chain has been cracked and

removed. In addition, the appearance of IR bands

assigned to the R–NHþ3 of the protonated amine

supports the proposed mechanism of Hofmann

degradation of the template.

We described previously the temporal evolution

of hexagonal mesophases of silica (Si-MCM-41),

titania and zirconia as a function of temperature

[19]. Detailed in situ XRD studies with a high

temperature XRD chamber system were conducted

in conjunction with TG–DTA and MS. The ther-mal behavior of cationic surfactant templates in the

mesostructured systems has been analyzed. In the

particular case of Si-MCM-41, an initial change

occurred up to 250 �C with an increase in intensity

of all reflections, with the (1 1 0) and (2 0 0) re-

flections increasing later and at a higher rate than

the (1 0 0) reflection. Above 300 �C, changes wereless pronounced and the intensities remained un-changed while the sample was kept at 550 �C. TheTG–DTA/MS data showed that the decomposition

mechanism in air involves three steps. An initial

endothermic effect, between 150 and 250 �C, wasassigned to Hofmann elimination of trimethyl-

amine, leading to a hydrocarbon chain. During this

step (below 250 �C), 46% of template was removed

by evaporation of the alkene resulting from theHofmann degradation. Keene et al. [29] used

sample controlled thermal analysis (SCTA) cou-

pled with a mass spectrometer to carefully elimi-

nate the organic surfactant and study the evolved

gases in situ during the thermal decomposition of

the template. They found hexadecene to be the

major evolved product in this range of tempera-

tures, confirming the elimination of the trimethyl-amine and the formation of the alkene by Hofmann

degradation. They obtained additional evidence

for the presence of hexadecene by collecting the

intermediate evolved species during calcination,

and further characterizing them by GC/MS, and1H and 13C NMR. The second step appearing in

the temperature range of 250–300 �C was shown

to be exothermic and originate from a carbonchain fragmentation. Several fragments assigned to

shorter chain lengths appeared in this interval

Page 4: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

4 F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29

accompanied with early oxidation processes pro-

ducing CO2 and H2O. We proposed that this step,

corresponding in the XRD to a less pronounced

increase in intensity, results from a successive car-

bon chain fragmentation or decomposition, with

early oxidation of different fragments [19]. Here,some cracking reactions on the hydrocarbon chain

may have also occurred. Finally, oxidation occur-

ring at 320 �C converted the remaining organic

components to carbon dioxide and water.

The removal of triblock copolymers species

(BCP) from as-synthesized SBA-15 was also in-

vestigated by TG–DTA. Two main processes were

observed: at low temperature (80 �C), desorptionof physisorbed water takes place, followed at

higher temperature (145 �C) by the exothermic

decomposition of the template [16,30]. The au-

thors suggested that this relatively low tempera-

ture decomposition compared to that of cationic

surfactants or the pure block copolymer may be

catalyzed by the inorganic framework.

In contrast to silicates, other compositions areusually more sensitive to thermal treatments and

calcination can result in breakdown of the struc-

tural integrity. Hydrolysis, redox reactions or phase

transformations account for this lower thermal

stability [31]. Therefore, the removal of the surf-

actant by thermal treatment happens to be more

difficult in the case of non-siliceous mesostructured

materials. We showed recently that template re-moval appeared to be completely different for the

titanium- and zirconium-based materials synthe-

sized with cationic surfactants: a single-step com-

plete oxidation of the surfactant was observed

around 300 �C in TG–DTA/MS. This was usually

accompanied with a drastic decrease in d-spacingand initial sharp increase in reflection intensity in

the XRD pattern, which generally led to the loss ofthe highly ordered mesostructure [19]. Neverthe-

less, various non-siliceous mesoporous materials

with well-ordered hexagonal and cubic phases

could be successfully obtained [20,32–37]. In ad-

dition, transition metal-based mesoporous materi-

als could be also synthesized in the presence of

block-copolymers [38], followed by extraction of

the template or calcination at temperatures below400 �C, these temperatures often being the upper

thermal stability limit.

An alternative method for surfactant removal is

based on the extraction of the organic template.

This can be done either by liquid extraction

[22,39,40], acid treatment [41], oxygen plasma

treatment [41], or supercritical fluid extraction

[42]. Dried as-synthesized MCM-41 samples areusually extracted in acid solutions, alcohols, neu-

tral salt solutions, ammonium acetate, or mixtures

of these. For example, Hitz et al. [40] showed that

an Al-MCM-41 sample could be extracted in

acidic media for 1 h at 78 �C. Up to 73% of the

template could be removed by extraction with so-

lutions of an acid or salt in ethanol. These authors

showed that when extracting with acidic ethanol,ion exchange of the counter cations for protons

could be achieved simultaneously. Using strong

acids or small cations was proved to be more ef-

ficient for the extraction of the template in ethanol,

suggesting that the size and, thus, the mobility of

the cations in the close-packed micellar aggregates

is one of the factors determining the extent of ex-

traction. Acids with low acid dissociation constantsuch as CH3COOH were less efficient. Moreover, it

seems that more polar solvents are superior to

dissolve the template ions. Accordingly, it is widely

suggested that an ion-exchange mechanism occurs

during solvent extraction of M41S-type materials.

The presence of cationic species in the extraction

liquid for charge balance is therefore essential for

the ion exchange. Various acidic media are usedfor surfactant extraction, ethanolic HCl solutions

being the most commonly employed. Differently,

the HMS [39] or SBA-types [15,16] frameworks

are considered to be relatively neutral, and the

resulting framework–surfactant interactions are

weak. Such weak electrostatic interactions or hy-

drogen bonding are more favorable for surfactant

extraction even in the absence of cationic speciessince counter cations are not needed. It is, for

example, possible to remove large amounts of cat-

ionic surfactant from an SBA-3 mesophase by ex-

traction in boiling ethanol for a short time [43]. The

templates from mesophases obtained with long-

chain amines [39], as well as transition metal-based

mesophases obtained from the ligand-assisted

method [44–46] are usually readily extracted. Alsoblock copolymers could be extracted from SBA-15

using acidic ethanol solutions for short times and

Page 5: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29 5

low temperatures [47,48]. Hence, extraction might

provide an alternative to calcination especially in

the case of non-siliceous mesophases, which show

a poor thermal stability. However, the possibility

of extraction of the template molecules depends

strongly on the nature of the interactions betweentemplate and inorganics, and the efficiency of this

method relies on a balance between extraction

time and temperature as well as on the compo-

sition and concentration of the extraction solu-

tion.

Another method to remove the template from

MCM-41 was pioneered recently by Keene et al.

[49,50]. Ozone was used to remove the organicsurfactant species at room temperature from an as-

synthesized mesophase to form mesoporous

MCM-41. As-synthesized MCM-41 was treated by

ozone using a UV lamp whose wavelength was

known to produce ozone from atmospheric oxy-

gen. The pore size of the resulting ozone-treated

sample was apparently larger, the pore size distri-

bution narrower and the hexagonal long-rangeordering of the pores seems to be improved com-

pared to MCM-41 calcined in an ordinary box

furnace. The unit cell parameter observed for the

ozone treated sample was found to be the same as

for the initial mesophase, which is in contrast with

calcination or ion exchange of the template. The

ozone treated samples seem to exhibit a higher

Si–OH group density than the calcined samples.UV–ozone treatment was subsequently applied to

remove non-ionic surfactants from mesostructured

silica thin films. Brinker and coworkers [51]

showed that room temperature UV–ozone treat-

ment provides an efficient way for the removal of

the template while simultaneously stabilizing the

inorganic silica framework into a well-defined

mesoscopic morphology. Their results establishedthat ozone treatment leads to complete removal of

the template, strengthens the inorganic framework

and renders the thin film surfaces highly hydro-

philic. The main advantages of ozone treatment

over conventional thermal treatments are that

elimination of organic molecules at room temper-

ature might be applicable to thermally unstable

mesostructured materials, and that no organicsolvents are needed. However, it seems that the

first ozone treatments performed on titania-based

mesophases led mainly to uncontrolled ozonation

resulting in a highly exothermic reaction and the

loss of mesoscopic order [52].

In the present contribution, we choose to focus

on materials based on silica. The first candidates

for in situ investigation of the removal of thetemplating species are materials that are synthe-

sized under alkaline conditions (MCM-41 and

MCM-48). Acid-prepared mesotructures such as

SBA-3 and SBA-15 will then be discussed. Com-

parison is made between materials with different

mesoscopic structures, synthesized with surfactant

with different chain lengths, and resulting from

different synthesis routes and chemical treatment.The removal of the template by calcination is

studied by combining high-temperature X-ray

diffraction, thermogravimetry–differential thermal

analysis and mass spectrometry, allowing in situ

investigations during the thermal treatment.

2. Experimental section

2.1. Materials

All materials described in this section are syn-

thesized according to published standard proce-

dures. The calcinations were performed at 550 �Cfor 5 h in all cases.

MCM-41-type materials were all preparedwithin 2 h according to the method described by

Gr€uun et al. [53]. The synthesis is based on the use

of TEOS (0.05 mol) as the silicon source, with

ammonia (0.14 mol) as the catalyst and an aque-

ous solution of surfactant (6.6 · 10�3 mol in 120 g

H2O). n-Alkyltrimethylammonium bromides of

different alkyl chain lengths, CnTAB with n ¼ 12–

18, were used as template. The original Gr€uunsynthesis was modified in 1999 [54] and Si-MCM-

41 samples with apparent increased structural or-

der were achieved by aging the materials in the

mother liquor at 90 �C for 7 days. n-Alkyltri-

methylammonium bromides can be substituted by

an equimolar amount of n-hexadecylpyridiniumchloride (cetylpyridinium chloride, CPCl) for an

alternative MCM-41 synthesis. The as-synthesizedmaterials are subsequently dried at 90 �C over-

night.

Page 6: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

6 F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29

High quality MCM-48 is obtained following the

hydrothermal method described by Fr€ooba et al.

[55] using TEOS (0.02 mol) as the silicon source,

and CTAB (0.013 mol) as the template in the

presence of KOH (0.01 mol) and water. As-syn-

thesized materials were isolated after 3–5 days ofhydrothermal treatment at 115 �C, washed with

H2O and dried.

As-synthesized SBA-3 is obtained at room

temperature by slow addition of TEOS (0.096 mol)

to an aqueous acidic (HCl) solution of CTAB

(0.012 mol) according to the standard procedure

[15].

SBA-15 is normally synthesized according tothe acidic synthesis route using EO–PO–EO tri-

block copolymers of the pluronic-type as structure

directing agents [16,30]. SBA-15 was prepared with

TEOS as the silicon source and EO20–PO70–EO20

(P123) as the template in an aqueous HCl solution,

according to Zhao et al. [16]. The synthesis is

carried out for 24 h at 40 �C followed by 24 h at

90 �C.The detailed structural parameters result-

ing from the in situ XRD investigations and the

physicochemical parameters obtained by N2 sorp-

tion of all materials described in this report are

summarized in Tables 1 and 2. The results are in

line with the data published previously on these

materials.

2.2. Characterization methods

The purpose of the present study is to investi-

gate the removal of the template upon thermal

treatment from mesostructured frameworks. For

this, in situ high temperature powder X-ray dif-

fraction methods have been used.

The in situ high temperature measurementswere recorded on a Stoe STADI P h–h powder

X-ray diffractometer in reflection geometry (Bragg–

Brentano) using Cu-Ka1þ2 radiation with second-

ary monochromator and scintillation detector.

A high temperature X-ray diffraction chamber

(Johanna Otto HDK S1), with a Pt/Rh heating

element as a sample holder, was mounted on the

goniometer. XRD patterns were typically recordedwith an automatic divergence slit configuration

(ADS, receiving slit fixed at 0.8 mm), except SBA-

15 samples, which were measured in a fixed slit

configuration (FS). XRD patterns were typically

recorded in a range of 1–8� (2h) with step¼ 0.05�(2h) and time/step¼ 4 or 8 s. SBA-15 was mea-

sured in a range of 0.8–3� (2h) with step¼ 0.02�(2h) and time/step¼ 5 s.

For in situ high temperature experiments, all

the samples in the as-synthesized form containing

the templating species were ground prior to anal-

ysis. A small amount of ethanol or hexane was

used to disperse the materials homogeneously on

the sample holder. The samples were heated step-

wise with a heating rate of 5 �C/min, up to the final

calcination temperature. This temperature wasmaintained for several hours, then the sample was

cooled down. XRD measurements were performed

every 50 �C during the heating process, every hour

during the isothermal heating, and at various

temperatures upon cooling. To adopt the usual

oven calcination conditions, all the measurements

were carried out in air. The thickness of the sample

preparation was about 0.2–0.3 mm, and the sam-ple surface was homogeneous. The preparation

has to be very thin to avoid any temperature gra-

dient in the sample during thermal treatment.

Therefore, the sample temperature is considered to

be close to the temperature of the Pt/Rh band

sample holder. Phenomena of ‘‘hot spots’’ and

rapid overheating of the sample bed (glow effects)

[56] can be neglected. For a diffractometer, theinstrumental error limits the precision of the d-spacings measured at low angle for each meso-

structured materials of interest. Discrepancies may

originate from differences in sample preparation,

since differences in scattering volume and sample

packing density can lead to different diffraction

patterns in terms of signal-to-noise ratio. More-

over, the accuracy, with regard to the positions ofthe reflections and their intensity, for measure-

ments performed with material deposited on the

Pt/Rh band is strongly influenced by the homo-

geneity and the thickness of the preparation.

Therefore, materials treated in situ and under

conventional conditions in a box furnace were

compared to test the reproducibility and validity

of the measurements. Even when significant latticeshrinkage is observed upon the removal of the

template, the matching positions of the low angle

Page 7: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

Table 1

Results of the in situ XRD investigations carried out on different surfactant-templated silica mesophases

Materials aas�synthesized

(nm)

acalcined (550 �C)(nm) (%)a

I(1 0 0):I(1 1 0)b

as-synthesized

I(1 1 0):I(2 0 0)as-synthesized

I(1 0 0):I(1 1 0)b

calcined (RT)

I(1 1 0):I(2 0 0)calcined (RT)

C12-MCM-41 3.73 3.51 (6) 10 1.1 15 2

C14-MCM-41 4.17 3.82 (8) 4 0.9 5 1.1

C16-MCM-41 4.64 4.16 (10) 7.3 1 10.5 1.55

C18-MCM-41 5.25 4.80 (9) 9.7 1.1 6.5 1.6

C14-MCM-41-aged 4.35 4.15 (4) 10.5 1.2 9 1.3

C16-MCM-41-aged 4.75 4.6 (3) 6.85 1.2 4.2 1.4

C18-MCM-41-aged 5.46 5.15 (5) 6.25 1.25 5 1.4

CPCl/MCM-41 4.45 3.95 (11) 6.3 0.9 6.75 1.3

MCM-48 9.60 8.33 (13) 5.9c – 11c –

SBA-3 4.53 3.73 (18) 12 1.3 37.5 1.5

SBA-3 extracted 4.40 3.8 (14) 13 1.5 25 1.85

SBA-15d 12.11 10.52 (13) 16.9 0.8 15.9 1.35

a Lattice contraction (%).b The intensities were measured with a diffractometer in reflection geometry and automatic divergence slit (ADS) configuration

(average values with subtraction of the background scattering). The experimental error on the intensity ratios is estimated to be 10%.cRatio (2 1 1):(3 3 2).d The XRD measurements were carried out in fixed slit configuration (FS).

Table 2

Physico-chemical parameters observed for the calcined materials, obtained by nitrogen physisorption

Materials BET surface

areaa (m2/g)

Total pore vol-

ume, Vp (cm3/g)

Pore size,

wBJHdes: (nm)

Pore size,

wdb (nm)

Wall thickness,

bBJHc (nm)

Wall thickness,

bd d (nm)

C12-MCM-41e 1035 0.51 2.06 2.55 1.45 0.96

C14-MCM-41 1100 0.61 2.12 2.89 1.7 0.93

C16-MCM-41 1130 0.78 2.47 3.31 1.7 0.85

C18-MCM-41 995 0.79 2.90 3.83 1.9 0.97

C14-MCM-41-aged 910 0.57 2.32 3.10 1.85 1.05

C16-MCM-41-aged 1010 0.80 2.82 3.67 1.8 0.93

C18-MCM-41-aged 1015 0.85 3.62 4.16 1.55 0.99

CPCl/MCM-41 995 0.58 2.24 2.96 1.7 0.99

MCM-48 1175 0.72 2.16 – – –

SBA-3f 1470 0.65 2.04 2.86 1.7 0.87

SBA-15f 737 0:67VpðmesoÞ 5.42 8.07g 5.10 2.45

0:13VpðmicroÞaAverage BET surface area.bObtained from the geometrical model with equation wd ¼ cd100

Vpq1þ Vpq

� �1=2

, c ¼ 1:155 (hexagonal pores) and q ¼ 2:2 g/cm3.cWall thickness calculated as a� wBJH.dWall thickness calculated as a� wd .e Limit of the BET equation accuracy.f The presence of microporosity in the silica walls makes the use of the BET equation and the t-plot method likely inaccurate re-

sulting in discrepancies.gObtained from the geometrical model with equation wSBA�15

d ¼ cd100VpðmesoÞ

1=qþ VpðmesoÞ þ VpðmicroÞ

� �1=2

c ¼ 1:213 (circular pores) and

q ¼ 2:2 g/cm3 [86].

F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29 7

reflections indicated a good reproducibility and

proved the in situ XRD measurements to be ap-propriate [57] (see for example inset in Fig. 10a). A

rough estimation of the measurement error during

the different calcination protocols can be madegiving average variations between in situ and

Page 8: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

8 F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29

conventional calcination procedures of about 0.1

nm for the repeat distances at low angle. Fur-

thermore, it is recognized that an absolute error of

about 0.1 nm due to the limits of the synthesis

reproducibility can be observed for the d value

measured for several syntheses of a same material.It is therefore reasonable to assume an absolute

experimental error of 0.1–0.2 nm.

In order to study the chemical and physical

aspects of the surfactant degradation within the

mesopores, thermogravimetry (TG) in combina-

tion with differential thermal analysis (DTA) ex-

periments were carried out. The conventional

thermobalance was coupled with a quadrupolemass spectrometer. This setup allows the charac-

terization of the species evolved during thermal

treatment [58]. The thermogravimetric analyses

combined with differential thermal analyses were

performed on a Netzsch STA 449 C thermobal-

ance coupled with a Balzers Thermostar 442 mass

spectrometer (temperature of the transfer capillary

was 160 �C). The measurements were carried outunder air with a heating rate of 5 �C/min for as-

synthesized samples. All TG–DTA and MS results

are reproducible within an error estimated to be

±10 �C.The N2 sorption measurements were performed

on a Micromeritics ASAP 2010 adsorption unit.

Prior to the measurements, the calcined samples

were activated under vacuum for 5 h at 200 �C.The measurements were performed at 77 K using a

static-volumetric method. The empty volume was

measured with helium gas.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Materials synthesized under alkaline conditions

(SþI�)

The mesophase formation under alkaline con-

ditions is based on cooperative electrostatic inter-

actions between negatively charged oligomeric

silicate species I� and positively charged surfactant

molecules Sþ [15,59]. In general, one considers the

mesostructured silica network obtained under al-kaline conditions to contain significant amounts of

negative charges.

3.1.1. MCM-41 (Gr€uun synthesis) [53]

The standard reference material is pure Si-

MCM-41 synthesized in the presence of cetyl-

trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB, n ¼ 16) as

the template, denoted C16-MCM-41. The d(1 0 0)-spacing of the well-resolved hexagonal p6m phase,

measured ex situ prior to calcination, is about 4.05

nm, giving a unit cell constant aas-made ¼ 4:68 nm.

After the removal of the template by thermal

treatment, the hexagonal phase is retained (Fig.

1a). The d-spacing of the (1 0 0) reflection is how-

ever shifted to about 3.55 nm, resulting in

acalcined ¼ 4:1 nm, which corresponds to a latticeshrinkage of about 12%. The unit cell constant

aas-made for a C16-MCM-41 aged at 90 �C for

7 days increases slightly with dð100Þ ¼ 4:2 nm

and a ¼ 4:85 nm. In contrast, however, the lattice

shrinkage upon thermal treatment is substantially

reduced. The d(1 0 0) of the calcined sample aged

at 90 �C is 4.15 nm with acalcined ¼ 4:79 nm, indi-

cating a lattice shrinkage of only 1–2%. This factsuggests that materials obtained after an aging

period have a higher thermal stability. Further-

more, the diffraction pattern obtained on a mate-

rial aged for several days seems to exhibit a better

resolution with a higher signal-to-noise ratio

compared to MCM-41 synthesized at room tem-

perature. Assuming a same volume of matter for

the X-ray preparation, one may suggest a higherdegree of order and/or a larger coherent scattering

domain size. The relative I(1 0 0):I(1 1 0) and

I(1 1 0):I(2 0 0) ratios measured ex situ after calci-

nation are 21 and 1.5 for C16-MCM-41-aged, and

23.5 and 1.3 for C16-MCM-41 synthesized at

room temperature, respectively. The N2 sorption

isotherms in Fig. 1b show that a capillary con-

densation step is present in both cases. The posi-tion of the capillary condensation step is shifted to

higher relative pressures for the aged MCM-41

material, indicating a larger pore size, in agree-

ment with the XRD data. Furthermore, the aged

sample presents a steeper increase during the

capillary condensation suggesting a narrower pore

size distribution. The adsorption capacity and

surface area are comparable.We have shown in a previous study concerned

with in situ XRD investigations during calcination

of Si-MCM-41 that an initial intensity change

Page 9: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

2 6 102 theta [°]

Si-MCM-41 aged

Si-MCM-41 conventional

x 8

x 8

(a)

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00

100

200

300

400

500

600

Si-MCM-41 aged

Si-MCM-41 conventional

P/P(b)

Inte

nsity

Volu

me

adso

rbed

[cm

/g]

4 8

0

3

Fig. 1. (a) Comparative X-ray diffraction patterns of a C16-

MCM-41 sample synthesized at room temperature (bottom)

and C16-MCM-41 after aging at 90 �C for a week (top). Both

samples are calcined. The patterns were obtained ex situ on a

diffractometer in transmission geometry. (b) N2 sorption iso-

therms at 77 K obtained on a C16-MCM-41 sample synthesized

at room temperature (open symbols) and C16-MCM-41 after

aging at 90 �C for a week (solid symbols).

I(100) conventional

3.00

3.25

3.50

3.75

4.00

d-spacing [nm]conventional sample

aged sample

Temperature [°C]

Temperature [°C]

I(110)I(200) 1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

2.4

d(110)d(200)

RT RT

d-spacing [nm]

Inte

nsity

Inte

nsity

150 250 350 450 550 550 150

RT RT150 250 350 450 550 550 150

Fig. 2. Evolution of the reflection intensities (solid symbols) of

C16-MCM-41 (CTAB/MCM-41) as a function of temperature

(calcination at 550 �C for 5 h). Also plotted are the d-spacingvalues (open symbols) of the respective reflections. The triangle

symbols, in the top figure, show the evolution of the reflections

of MCM-41 aged at 90 �C. Top: evolution of the (1 0 0) re-

flection. Bottom: evolution of the (1 1 0) and (2 0 0) reflections.

The connecting black solid lines are used as guide for the eye.

F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29 9

occurs up to 250 �C with an increase of all re-

flection intensities [19]. Fig. 2 shows the details of

the evolution of the maximum intensities of the

reflections at low angles recorded in situ for C16-

MCM-41 synthesized at room temperature (con-ventional) and illustrates the evolution of the

d-spacings during the calcination. The graph clearlyshows a stepwise evolution of the reflections (room

temperature–200 �C, 200–350 �C, 350 �C–cooling

process), with the d-spacing values following a

similar temperature dependence. The d(1 0 0) is

reduced by about 0.45 nm, the largest d-spacingshift occurring between 150 and 250 �C. A sub-

sequent less pronounced shrinkage takes place

mostly above 400 �C up to the maximum tem-

perature applied. During the cooling process, a

slight loss in scattering intensity is observed, indi-cating a loss of scattering contrast. This effect is

reversible, since heating the sample leads to the

recovery of the intensity, and it can be attributed

to physisorbed water condensing in the pores.

The faster increase of the (1 0 0) intensity below

200 �C relative to the (1 1 0) and (2 0 0) reflections

is clearly observed. In addition, the scattering in-

tensities of the (1 1 0) and (2 0 0) reflections reacha maximum at 350–400 �C, before decreasing

Page 10: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

10 F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29

linearly (bottom graph). The general strong in-

crease in intensity appearing in XRD with in-

creasing temperature is due to the higher scattering

contrast between the pore walls and the inside of

the pores, caused by the burning-out of the tem-

plating organic species. As the relative intensitiesof the low angle reflections are very dependent on

the distribution of matter in the pores [60–63], we

assume that selective removal and redistribution of

surfactant fragments in the pores may be respon-

sible for the different growth rates of the individual

reflections. In particular, the (1 0 0) reflection in-

tensity is shown to be very sensitive to the density

contrast between framework walls and mesopores.Recent works on simulations of XRD pattern

allow precise investigation of the influence of mat-

ter distribution in the unit cell on the diffraction

pattern. Hammond et al. [61] could explain the

dramatic change in the X-ray scattering that oc-

curs upon removal of the template from MCM-41

by using a lattice model with hexagonal channels

and a different scattering form factor for the walland the matter in the channel. They proved that

the (1 0 0) intensity increase upon calcination arises

from different phase cancellation between scatter-

ing from the wall and the pores. Therefore, once

the template is removed from the pore region, the

effect of this phase cancellation is reduced, leading

to an enhanced scattering intensity. In a recent

series of studies, Solovyov et al. [64,65] usedRietveld�s method in combination with continuous

electron density representations to achieve struc-

tural modeling of MCM-41 materials, before and

after removal of the n-alkylammonium template.

These authors compared experimental and calcu-

lated XRD patterns and modeled the averaged

density distribution in the materials. They could

show by electron density distribution maps thedecrease of the density within the mesopores that

accompanies the diffraction peak increase during

calcination. Most interestingly, they also showed

that the surfactant distribution in the mesopores of

as-synthesized samples obtained under alkaline

conditions is not uniform, with a distinct minimum

in the pore center. This fact might play a signifi-

cant role in the contrast evolution of the dif-fraction peaks during the template removal from

Si-MCM-41. In addition to this, the surface

roughness and the presence of molecules bonded

to the inorganic surface within the pores may also

induce strong variation in scattering contrast at

low angle [63].

The sample aged at 90 �C shows a similar

evolution of the reflection intensities observed ingeneral for all reflections during thermal treatment

according to the three step process as described for

the conventional material. From the graph, the

remarkable stability of the mesophase treated at 90

�C is evidenced. The sample aged at 90 �C shows

only a small d-spacing shift (0.1 nm) to lower

values, mostly between room temperature and 150

�C, as physisorbed water is removed. It is rea-sonable to propose that the lower shrinkage of the

unit cell of an aged MCM-41 is a result of a better

wall condensation [66]. The increased thermal

stability and structural order are achieved since

hydrolysis of the silicon source and further con-

densation of the inorganic network are enhanced

during the aging period performed in the mother

liquor, leading to higher cross-linking of the in-organic species making up the walls [67]. On the

other hand, the expulsion of electrolytes and

surfactant molecules may play an additional role

in the packing of the surfactant and the conden-

sation of the mesophase [68,69]. One has to keep in

mind, however, that depending on the synthesis

conditions, undesired structural degradation and

loss of pore uniformity could occur upon pro-longed hydrothermal treatment at high tempera-

tures, due to re-hydrolysis and dissolution of the

framework [70].

The TG–DTA results showed that three main

processes take place upon heating C16-MCM-41,

in agreement with Zhao et al. [71]. At temperatures

below 150 �C, physically adsorbed water is re-

moved. The following stage occurs between 150and 350 �C and corresponds to the decomposition

of the organics. Finally, an additional weight loss

is measured at higher temperatures up to 600 �C,often assigned to dehydroxylation of silanol and

residual coke combustion. Our previous TG–

DTA/MS studies revealed that the mechanism of

removal of the organic template involves three

precise steps [19]. The initial endothermic effectbetween 150 and 250 �C is caused by the elimi-

nation of the trimethylamine head group, via

Page 11: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29 11

Hofmann degradation, which leads to a hydro-

carbon chain (m=z ¼ 26, 41, 42, 55, 69). The sec-

ond effect in the TG–DTA is exothermic and takes

place in the temperature range of 250–300 �C.Several fragments assigned to shorter chain

lengths (m=z ¼ 26, 41, 42) appear in this intervalaccompanied with early oxidation processes pro-

ducing CO2 (m=z ¼ 44), NO2 (m=z ¼ 30, 46), and

H2O (m=z ¼ 18). We proposed that this step re-

sults from a successive carbon chain fragmentation

or decomposition, with early oxidation reactions.

Finally, the major part of the oxidation occurs

between 300 and 350 �C and converts the re-

maining organic components (18%) to carbon di-oxide, water, and probably residual carbonaceous

species. After the oxidation processes up to 350 �Chave been completed, about 15% of the organics

remain in the material up to higher temperature.

These template residues are probably carbona-

ceous species since only small quantities of water

are produced from Si–OH condensation beyond

350 �C. The removal of the template from meso-structured samples of MCM-41 aged 7 days at 90

�C proceeds via the same reaction scheme. The

thermal stability of the aged materials is, however,

higher. Furthermore, a lower amount of surfac-

tant is contained in the as-synthesized mesophase

(Table 3). Total weight losses of 46% and 40% are

measured for C16-MCM-41 and C16-MCM-41

aged, respectively.All materials synthesized with nc ¼ 12–18 ex-

hibit XRD patterns (not shown) showing a well-

resolved hexagonal mesophase indexed to the p6m

Table 3

Mass losses recorded by thermogravimetry for MCM-41 samples sy

losses below 110 �C attributed to physisorbed water)

Samples 25–110 �C(%)

110–265 �C(%)

265–305

(%)

C12-MCM-41 3 24 5

C14-MCM-41 3 24 6

C16-MCM-41 2 21 9

C18-MCM-41 3 19 10

C14-MCM-41 aged 4 21 6

C16-MCM-41 aged 2 19 7

C18-MCM-41 aged 3 17 10

aWe provide values obtained for energy released associated with

trends. Precise quantitative calorimetric data can be obtained from a

symmetry. As expected, the interplanar distance

d(1 0 0) increases with increasing alkyl chain

length. The unit cell size and pore size of the

calcined materials are found to be determined by

the alkyl chain length of the cationic surfactant

used (Tables 1 and 2). The in situ XRD resultsobtained for materials synthesized with alkylam-

monium bromide surfactants having alkyl chains

with nc ¼ 12, 14 and 18 are obviously similar to

the ones obtained with nc ¼ 16 (Fig. 3), suggesting

a similar stepwise process of template removal. A

decrease of the distance d is observed for all

samples predominantly before 300 �C, similar to

that observed with C16-MCM-41. The scatteringintensities of all reflections increase progressively

at different growth rates as the template species are

burnt out of the channels. The variations in the

growth rates with dependence on the surfactant

chain length, observed at the early stages of the

heating process (temperatures below 300 �C), seemto suggest that the growth rate in scattering in-

tensity for materials synthesized with shortersurfactant chains could be slightly lower (Fig. 3b).

The direct comparison of the relative intensities at

low 2h angles for materials having different unit

cell size is critical due to the dependence of the

scattering form factors with diffraction angle. In

general, higher scattering intensities are expected

with decreasing 2h angles. However, since the unit

cell size at the different temperature steps arecomparable for a material, and the changes with

angle in the range of interest are small [63], we may

relate this effect to the respective ratio of wall

nthesized with surfactants having different chain lengths (mass

�C 305–395 �C(%) (lV/mg)a

395–1000

�C (%)

Total mass

loss (%)

3 (0.5) 4 39

5 (0.6) 5 43

8 (0.8) 6 46

9 (1.10) 7 48

4 (0.7) 4 39

7 (0.9) 5 40

9 (1.2) 6 45

the main exothermic DTA peak to highlight qualitatively the

dditional DSC experiments.

Page 12: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

RT 150 250 350 450 550 550 150 RTTemperature [°C]

3.0

3.4

3.8

4.2

4.6 C18C16

C14C12

d-sp

acin

g [n

m]

C12C14C16C18

Log 1

0 in

tens

ity

(a)

RT 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550Temperature [°C](b)

Fig. 3. (a) d(1 0 0) values recorded as a function of temperature

for the materials synthesized in the presence of alkylammonium

surfactants with nc ¼ 12–18. (b) Log10 plot of the intensities of

the low angle reflections during the heating ramp for the same

materials (top: plots for (1 0 0), bottom: plots for (1 1 0)).

12 F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29

thickness to pore size. The size of the pore is

shown to decrease with shorter carbon chains,with the wall size bd remaining relatively constant

around 1 nm (Table 2), in agreement with the

published data [70]. To gain further evidence, a

detailed comparative study of experimental XRD

data and series of simulated XRD patterns would

be highly informative here. The in situ data ob-

tained on aged samples proved the higher thermal

stability of all Cnc-MCM-41 aged samples com-pared to their conventional counterparts.

The TG–DTA/MS measurements performed on

these materials show that the weight loss is found

to increase as the alkyl chain length of the surf-

actant increases (Table 3). This fact could be at-

tributed to an increasing size and molecular weight

[72] of the micellar aggregates relative to the

amount of inorganic matter that is embedding the

templating species. The lower amount of organics

contained in the material after aging may result

from re-dissolution of some of the template in the

mother liquor and/or expulsion of template mole-

cules upon the course of condensation. For all

samples, the TG–DTA/MS indicates a similarmechanism of decomposition of the organic tem-

plate involving three steps. A general trend is that

the proportion of organics removed at lower

temperature (between 150 and 260 �C) seems to be

reduced with increasing surfactant chain length.

On the other side, the relative fraction of organics

that undergo subsequent decomposition and oxi-

dation reactions at higher temperatures increases.This effect is particularly marked for C18-MCM-

41. However, it remains unclear whether it is

caused by a lower yield of the Hofmann degra-

dation in favor to oxidation processes, or by mass

transfer limitations of the larger organic species

produced by the elimination. In addition, if mass-

transport is a rate-limiting step, it is expected that

diffusion control could result in much broaderDTA peaks, such as observed at high temperatures

(above 400 �C) during the calcination of smaller

pore metal oxophosphates [19].

To facilitate the comparison, the weight change

derivatives can be calculated from the weight

change curves measured in TG (Fig. 4). The de-

composition/desorption of the cationic surfactant

gives rise to pronounced peaks in the weightchange derivatives at 150–400 �C. In all cases, the

peaks indicate three temperature ranges for the

decomposition of the template, corresponding to

the stepwise process. An additional broader peak

appears at about 550 �C, increasing in intensity

with the alkyl chain length increasing.

In Fig. 5 are plotted various molecular species

recorded during TG/MS, that are attributed to thecarbon chain of the surfactant (m=z ¼ 26, 42, 55)

and the trimethylammonium head group (m=z ¼59) of the different MCM-41 samples. This figure

shows the decrease of the fraction of the organic

chain removed at lower temperatures relative to

the fraction removed during decomposition and

oxidations at higher temperatures. This effect is

particularly marked for smaller molecular frag-ments. Furthermore, the fragments m=z ¼ 59 at-

tributed to the trimethylammonium head group of

Page 13: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900Temperature [°C]

-1.4-1.2-1.0-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.20

C18-MCM-41

C16-MCM-41

C14-MCM-41

C12-MCM-41

DTG

[%/°C

]

Fig. 4. Weight change derivatives of MCM-41 synthesized with

alkyltrimethylammonium surfactants with increasing carbon

chain length. C12, C14 and C16-MCM-41 are shifted for clarity

by 1.8, 1.2 and 0.6%/�C, respectively. The dotted line indicates

the limit temperature (250 �C) between Hofmann elimination

and oxidation.

F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29 13

the surfactants are detected at lower temperatures

for the longer chains surfactants. Interestingly, the

plots obtained for the C18-MCM-41 show an ad-

ditional second step or shoulder in the lower

temperatures range in the MS traces. This new step

is probably caused by surfactant molecules in-

volved in different types of surface interactionswith the inorganic framework.

The nature of the interaction between the head

group of the surfactant and the silica surface seems

to play a crucial role in directing the processes

involved in the removal of the surfactant. The in-

fluence of the surfactant head group might be

probed by changing the nature of the polar head

group. Khushalani et al. [73] demonstrated firstthat MCM-41 could also be synthesized in the

presence of cetylpyridinium chloride (CPCl) as the

template. It is believed that the CPCl/MCM-41

mesophase formation is possible according to the

SþI� route because this surfactant is cationic, and

has a similar aggregation number and CMC value

to CTACl, which is often used. However, CPCl

allows also for variation in the charge density at

the head group. In addition, it is suggested that the

micellar aggregates formed during the synthesis

exhibit an increased rigidity compared to other

alkylammonium surfactants and that the interac-

tion between the pyridyl ring of the surfactant and

silica is stronger. Therefore, it is likely that theremoval of the surfactant species upon thermal

treatment could proceed differently.

The XRD patterns stack plot of MCM-41 ob-

tained from the Gr€uun synthesis with CPCl is

shown in Fig. 6a. The d(1 0 0) value measured for

the as-synthesized materials is about 3.9 nm,

comparable to CTAB/MCM-41 (C16-MCM-41).

The XRD patterns indicate that the reflectionsobserved at low angles are narrower and with a

higher signal-to-noise ratio than CTAB/MCM-41,

in agreement with the literature statements [54,73].

From the developing XRD patterns, it is seen that

the scattering intensities of all reflections at low

angles remain constant up to 250 �C, which sug-

gests no drastic changes in the distribution of

matter in the pores and/or low contrast variationbetween pore walls and the inside of the channels.

From 250 �C, all intensities increase drastically,

with the (1 0 0) reflection increasing at a slightly

higher growth rate, reaching their maxima at the

calcination plateau of 550 �C. From 550 �C, theintensities remain constant until the cooling starts

where variations in contrast are again observed,

due to water adsorption. The (1 1 0), (2 0 0), and(2 1 0) reflections are retained after calcination. In

graph 6b are illustrated the evolution of the re-

flection intensities and the respective values of the

d-spacings. The simultaneous increase in intensity

of all reflections is observed after 250 �C. The

comparison with CTAB/MCM-41 emphasizes the

different behavior. The first noticeable decrease in

d-spacing occurs up to 250–300 �C. Subsequently,a second observable shrinkage is measured be-

tween 500 �C and the first hour at 550 �C.The TG–DTA/MS data recorded on CPCl/

MCM-41 are depicted in Fig. 7. The first stage is

the removal of the physisorbed water. It is fol-

lowed by the main conversion of the template

species between �180 and 450 �C which is a two-

step process (200–300 and 300–450 �C). Duringthis stage, only exothermic peaks are detected, sug-

gesting oxidative decomposition and burning-out

Page 14: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

Temperature [°C]

m/z = 55

100 200 300 400 500 600 700

N(CH3)3m/z = 59

Temperature [°C]100 200 300 400 500 600 700

100 200 300 400 500 600 700

C2H2

C4H7

C3H6m/z = 26 m/z = 42

100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Fig. 5. Plots of various molecular species recorded with MS on C12, C14, C16 and C18-MCM-41 (from top to bottom) and their

evolution with temperature.

14 F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29

of the organic species. The major exothermic

process takes place between 290 and 420 �C (cen-

tered at 340± 2 �C), similar to CTAB/MCM-41.

The total mass loss recorded on the mesophase

synthesized with CPCl is comparable to that of

CTAB/MCM-41. However, the removal of the

Page 15: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.02 theta [°]

Inte

nsity

d-spacing [nm]

100110200

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

RT 150 250 350 450 550 550 150 RT

Temperature [°C]

(a)

Inte

nsity

(b)

RT

RT

250°C450°C

550°C

550°C150°C

Fig. 6. (a) XRD patterns stack plot of MCM-41 obtained from the Gr€uun synthesis with CPCl as template. Shown are subsequent

XRD patterns as the material is calcined up to a temperature of 550 �C, held at this temperature for 5 h and cooled to room tem-

perature. (b) Evolution of the reflection intensities of CPCl/MCM-41 as a function of temperature (calcination at 550 �C for 5 h). Also

plotted are the d-spacing values of the respective reflections (open symbols). Represented with a cross-dotted line is the intensity of

(1 0 0) of CTAB/MCM-41 as reference.

F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29 15

template occurs differently as highlighted by the

comparative curves in Figs. 6b and 7. The presence

of the fragment assigned to the pyridyl head group

(m=z ¼ 79) appearing around 250 �C suggests that

the surfactant molecule is first decomposed into

two species, probably via an elimination-type re-

action or cracking. However, significantly loweramounts of the carbon chain species are detected

at this temperature range in relation to the high

fraction evolved at higher temperatures. At this

step, only 24% of the surfactant species are re-

moved (11% in weight loss). This may explain the

modest growth rate of the XRD reflections inten-

sity. Subsequently, 44% of the organic template

(20% in weight loss) is removed during the main

oxidation step between 300 and 450 �C with a

relatively high energy release. This process is ac-

companied by the simultaneous increase of all re-

flection intensities in the XRD patterns (Fig. 6).

It seems that the major part of the surfactant isremoved by exothermic decomposition and oxi-

dation processes, likely increasing the production

of coke during the calcination. The CPCl/MCM-

41 sample studied here contains about 15% of

carbonaceous species after the main oxidation re-

action (>450 �C), which is substantially higher

Page 16: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900Temperature [°C]

-1.8

-1.4

-1.0

-0.6

-0.2

60

70

80

90

100

341°C

255°C

-15%

-20%

-11%

-1.5 %

H2O m/z = 18

CO2 m/z = 44

C5H5N m/z = 79

DTA signal [uV/m

g]

Wei

ght l

oss

[%]

Inte

nsity

of m

ass

sign

al

exo

CxHy m/z = 42

CxHy m/z = 42,55C16-MCM-41

Fig. 7. TG–DTA/MS measurements performed on a CPCl/

MCM-41 mesophase. Bottom: TGA data with a black dashed

line with its first derivative curve (gray curve), and the DTA

curve with a solid line. The added grey dotted line corresponds

to the TGA data of a MCM-41 sample synthesized with CTAB

(C16-MCM-41). Top: molecular species recorded from the MS

and their evolution with temperature.

16 F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29

than the amount estimated for CTAB/MCM-41

(Table 3). These carbonaceous species represent

approximately 33% of the organics. The residual

species are converted to CO2 at temperatures be-

tween 450 and 550 �C, with an additional shrink-

age of the hexagonal structure (Fig. 6), and an

additional X-ray scattering intensity increase. Themajor difference compared to CTAB/MCM-41 is

the lower weight loss occurring during elimination

and larger amounts of coke produced. The car-

bonaceous residues are however readily removed

to yield complete template removal. It seems that

the pyridinium head group surfactant undergoes

Hofmann elimination less readily than the trime-

thylammonium head group surfactant does.

The different diffraction peak intensity ratios

I(1 0 0):I(1 1 0) and I(1 1 0):I(2 0 0) calculated for all

MCM-41 materials, as-synthesized and calcined,are listed in Table 1. These ratios were obtained in

automatic slit divergence configuration, which

usually results in an increase of the reflections at

higher angles compared to the (1 0 0) reflection, and

therefore smaller values than thosemeasured ex situ

in transmission geometry. Marked differences in

the relative intensities between the reflections at

low angles are usually expected for materials withdifferent lattice size, having different pore size or/

and wall thickness, depending largely on the ratio

of the wall thickness to the pore diameter. How-

ever, within the experimental error, the ratios

I(1 0 0):I(1 1 0) measured before and after calcina-

tion are comparable. Conversely, the I(1 1 0):I(2 0 0) ratio seems to increase for all MCM-41

samples after removal of the template. The effect ismore pronounced for materials that have not been

aged at 90 �C, and might therefore originate from

increasing condensation features [69]. The stronger

increase of both ratios seen for the C12-MCM-41

sample is likely caused by a decrease in the sample

ordering and the loss of the reflection at higher

angles.

Except for CPCl/MCM-41, the results describedherein seem to confirm our previous statement

that two specific thermal behaviors can be distin-

guished during the calcination of samples synthe-

sized with n-alkylammonium surfactants under

alkaline conditions, implying the presence of

surfactant molecules involved in two types of in-

teractions within the mesopores and with the silica

surface [19]. The presence of non-uniform distri-bution of surfactant molecules in the mesopores,

as revealed by Solovyov et al. [64,65], is in agree-

ment with different locations of the surfactant

species, and possible differences in the inorganic–

surfactant interactions.

3.1.2. MCM-48 (cubic Ia�33d phase)

In comparison to MCM-41, the synthesis ofMCM-48 is more difficult. However, high quality

MCM-48 is obtained following the method de-

Page 17: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29 17

scribed by Fr€ooba et al. [55] using TEOS as the

silicon source, and CTAB as the template in the

presence of KOH and water. As-synthesized ma-

terials were isolated after 3–5 days of hydrother-

mal treatment at 115 �C. The high quality of all

as-made MCM-48 samples obtained (Fig. 8a inset)is indicated by the presence of at least eight re-

flections in the XRD patterns [74]. A pure cubic

phase is obtained. The average d(2 1 1) value is

3.97 nm for the as-synthesized material (aas-made ¼9:73 nm). After calcination, the reflections are

shifted to higher 2h angles, dð211Þ ¼ 3:37 nm

giving acalc: ¼ 8:25 nm, and their intensities are

increased in comparison with the as-synthesized

inte

nsity

inte

nsity

RT 150 250 350 450 550Temperature

2.(a)

(b)

0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.02 theta [°]

Fig. 8. (a) XRD patterns stack plot of CTAB/MCM-48 obtained by

silicon source. Shown are subsequent XRD patterns as the material is c

5 h and cooled to room temperature. Inset shows ex situ XRD pattern

the reflection intensities of MCM-48 as a function of temperature (c

d(2 1 1) (open symbols).

material. The contraction of the unit cell upon

calcination is about 15%, and the well-ordered

structure is retained.

The in situ XRD patterns stack plot obtained

on MCM-48 (Fig. 8a) shows the same scattering

intensity behavior as that of MCM-41. All in-tensities increase drastically as the calcination

proceeds, resulting from changes in scattering

contrasts. The (2 1 1) and (2 2 0) reflections increase

at a higher growth rate than the other reflections,

probably due to a different distribution of matter

inside the pores, similarly to Cn-MCM-41. From

300 �C, changes in intensity are less pronounced.

The result shows the good thermal stability of the

d(211) [nm]

(211)(220)(332)

3.0

3.2

3.4

3.6

3.8

4.0

d(211)

550 150 RT [°C]

8.0

2 4 6 8 10

Inte

nsity

2 theta [°]

211

x 8

220

321

400

420 33

242

243

152

161

154

1 543

250°C450°C

550°C

550°C150°C

RT

RT

hydrothermal synthesis with CTAB as template and TEOS as

alcined up to temperature of 550 �C, held at this temperature for

of as-synthesized MCM-48. (b) Graph showing the evolution of

alcination at 550 �C for 5 h). Also plotted is the evolution of

Page 18: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900Temperature [°C]

-1.0

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

50

60

70

80

90

100

-7%

-9 %

-11 %

-3%

325°C

N(CH3)3m/z = 59

m/z = 30

CxHy m/z = 26,42

H2O m/z = 18

CO2 m/z = 44

Inte

nsity

of m

ass

sign

alW

eigh

t los

s [%

] DTA signal [uV/m

g]

exo

-10%

-16 %

Fig. 9. TG–DTA/MS measurements performed on an as-

synthesized MCM-48 mesophase. Bottom: TGA data with a

dashed line with its first derivative curve (grey curve), and the

DTA curve with a solid line. Top: various molecular species

recorded from the MS with temperature.

18 F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29

3-D cubic structure during calcination. The graph

depicted in Fig. 8b shows a marked decrease in d-spacing observed predominantly below 250 �Cduring the heating ramp. The evolution of the in-

terplanar distance d(2 1 1) and the intensity of the

reflections approximately follow a three-step pro-cess. With respect to the XRD results, one can

assume that the mechanism of the removal of the

surfactant from MCM-48 is identical to that de-

scribed for CTAB/MCM-41. The intensity ratio

I(2 1 1):I(3 3 2) is shown to increase significantly

after calcination (Table 1), and a fairly marked

lattice shrinkage occurs (13%). This may point

towards a slightly lower thermal stability of theMCM-48 synthesized under the conditions de-

scribed, compared to the Cn-MCM-41 samples.

Fig. 9 shows the TG–DTA/MS measurements

performed on C16TAB/MCM-48. The results are

very similar to those of MCM-41. The stepwise

decomposition of the template occurs from 150 to

400 �C. This stage corresponding to the decom-

position processes of the templating species andtheir thermodesorption represents about 45% in

mass loss, which is comparable to the data re-

ported by other authors (�40–45%) [75,76]. The

step attributed to the Hofmann degradation of the

surfactant (150–250 �C) represents a weight loss of

26%, which is similar to that of the MCM-41

mesophases synthesized with short chain C12TAB

and C14TAB. Conversely, the successive oxidationsteps involve weight losses more comparable to

those of C16TAB/MCM-41. The main oxidation

peak is centered at 325± 2 �C. From 400 �C,changes provoked in the structure and scattering

contrast are due mostly to the removal of the re-

sidual carbonaceous species (about 7%), and the

release of a low amount of water due to conden-

sation of silanols. The organic content is shown tobe higher than that estimated previously for the

hexagonally ordered mesostructured silica meso-

phases, with a total weight loss of about 56%,

consistent with a higher void volume for the 3-D

structure. One can conclude that the 3-D open

structure has no strong effects on the processes

responsible for the removal of the template by

thermal treatment. Moreover, an additional step isobserved at low temperatures around 130 �C, andlikely assigned to surfactant species. The weight

loss measured in TG between 120 and 140 �C is

about 1.6–2%. One may speculate that a certain

amount of surfactants molecules remains adsorbed

in layers at the external surface. These moleculescould be desorbed at low temperature as usually

observed for lamellar phase. The presence of a

mixture of cubic and lamellar silica–surfactant

phase is rather unlikely on the basis of the high

quality XRD pattern of as-synthesized samples

(Fig. 8a inset), and the physisorption data ob-

tained after calcination (not shown). The nitrogen

sorption isotherm obtained for MCM-48 is atypical type IV isotherm. No evidence of triangu-

lar hysteresis at high relative pressures, originating

from the presence of a pore structure with narrow

Page 19: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29 19

constrictions, could be observed [77]. Such a pore

structure is usually expected when the lamellar

phase collapses. In addition, no microporosity

could be detected from the t-plot method. All

MCM-48 samples synthesized within 3–5 days at

115 �C showed similar features. However, con-tamination by a very low amount of silica–surf-

actant lamellar phase is still possible, but if so, not

critical for the quality of the final material. An-

other explanation is the possible lower tempera-

ture thermodesorption of surfactant contained in

the pores due to high diffusion properties of the

bicontinuous 3-D interconnected porous network.

The similitude of the thermal behaviors ob-served for MCM-41 and MCM-48 suggests that

the surfactant molecules are organized, in both

case, rather similarly within the mesopore chan-

nels, and that their respective interactions with

the silicate surface are of identical nature. In ad-

dition, Solovyov et al. revealed that a non-uniform

surfactant density is also observed for MCM-48

samples [65], confirming the resemblance withMCM-41.

3.2. Materials synthesized under acidic conditions

(SþX�Iþ)

3.2.1. SBA-3 [15]

The synthesis of SBA-3 is carried out in

strongly acidic aqueous solutions below the iso-electric point of silica. Under these conditions,

halide ions X� mediate the interaction between the

surfactant and positively charged oligomeric in-

organic species (SþX�Iþ) through weak hydrogen

bonding forces, which ensure the assembly of the

mesophase. Silica mesophases synthesized under

acidic conditions have different composition, pore

structure, wall thicknesses, and adsorption prop-erties compared with samples obtained by alkaline

routes [15,78]. During the polymerization process,

the protons associated with the silica species are

excluded until a neutral inorganic framework re-

mains. Hence, the framework charge is neutral or

slightly positive.

The ex situ XRD pattern shows the low angle

reflections indexed to a hexagonal p6m mesophase(see Fig. 10a inset) with dð100Þ ¼ 3:94 nm

(aas-made ¼ 4:55 nm). After calcination at 550 �C

for 5 h, d(1 0 0) decreased to 3.18 nm (acalc: ¼ 3:67nm), indicating a large lattice shrinkage of 19%.

Fig. 10a shows the development of the XRD

pattern during calcination of SBA-3. All the in-

tensities of the low angle reflections start increas-

ing simultaneously at temperatures above 250 �C.From 250 �C, the growth rate is high, with strong

increase in the scattering intensity. The intensities

reach their maxima at temperatures close to the

calcination plateau. During the remaining part of

the process of the calcination, no drastic changes

occur. The decrease in intensity observed during

the cooling stage is attributed to the adsorption of

water, which slightly decreases the scattering con-trast between walls and pores. Another feature is

the higher I(1 0 0):I(1 1 0) intensity ratio compared

to that observed for MCM-41. Considering that

the unit cell sizes of SBA-3 and C14 or C16-MCM-

41 are comparable (Table 1), this diffraction ef-

fect is likely caused by the differences in wall

thickness observed when comparing both type of

materials [63,78]. In addition, a significant increaseis clearly observed for the I(1 0 0):I(1 1 0) intensityratio of SBA-3 after calcination. The graph shown

in Fig. 10b illustrates the changes of the intensities

of the low angle reflections combined with the

evolution of the interplanar distances d(1 0 0),d(1 1 0) and d(2 0 0) as a function of temperature.

The d-spacings of the hexagonal mesophase de-

crease slightly below 150 �C upon removal ofphysisorbed water. The system remains then

mostly unchanged until 300 �C where all intensities

increase drastically, accompanied by a marked

decrease in d-spacing. The d-spacing shift to lower

values occurs mostly between 300 and 400 �C.Following this, no further lattice shrinkage is de-

tected, suggesting a relatively rapid process of de-

composition or thermodesorption of the templatewith no further structural rearrangement. The

overall unit cell contraction is about 18% and is

shown to be significantly larger than that mea-

sured for MCM-41 or MCM-48. Moreover, the

comparison with the evolution of the (1 0 0)

reflection intensity of C16-MCM-41 illustrates the

different nature of the decomposition process re-

sponsible for the removal of the template, andthe resulting differences in X-ray scattering con-

trasts.

Page 20: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.12 theta [°]

Inte

nsity

2 theta [°]

Rel

ativ

e In

tens

ity

1.0 3.0 5.0 7.0 9.0

as-synthesized

calcined

in situex situ

(a)

Inte

nsity

(b)

200°C400°C

550°C

550°C150°C

RT

RT

4.0

I(100)I(110)I(200)

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

(100)(110)(200)

RT150 250 350 450 550 550 150 RTTemperature [°C]

d-spacing [nm]

Fig. 10. (a) XRD patterns stack plot of SBA-3. Shown are subsequent XRD patterns as the material is calcined up to 550 �C, held for 5

h and cooled to room temperature. Inset shows a comparison of the XRD patterns recorded before and after calcination for SBA-3

under ex situ and in situ conditions. (b) Graph showing the evolution of the reflection intensities of SBA-3 as a function of temperature

(calcination at 550 �C for 5 h). Also plotted are the d-spacing values of the respective reflections (open symbols). Represented with a

cross-dotted line is the intensity of the (1 0 0) reflection of CTAB/MCM-41 as reference.

20 F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29

The TG–DTA/MS data (Fig. 11) show that the

template decomposition is a three-step process in a

narrow temperature range. After the desorption ofthe physically adsorbed water (1%), an endother-

mic process is recognized between 180 and 260 �C(centered at 239± 2 �C), which, however, has not

been discussed before. A marked heat effect and

a large weight loss (25%) are observed. During

this step, evaporation of HCl and H2O from the

mesophase initially takes place. This is followed by

elimination of the surfactant head group fragment(m=z ¼ 59) and some carbon chain fragments

(m=z ¼ 42, 55). It has to be noted that about half

of the mass loss (25%) is measured during this

endothermic step, resulting in a surprisingly

modest increase in X-ray scattering contrast and

no d-spacing shift. It is followed by an exothermicprocess (260–300 �C), corresponding to about 10%

in weight loss, likely attributed to surfactant de-

composition and early oxidation step with elimi-

nation of some CO2. The first derivative curve

calculated for the TG profile shows one broad

peak maximum between 150 and 300 �C, suggest-ing that the two first steps might be somehow

temperature-dependent competing effects. Above250 �C, endothermic evaporation and thermode-

sorption, and oxidative decomposition could occur

simultaneously and overlap in the DTA profile.

Page 21: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

50

60

70

80

90

100

337°C

342°C

239 °C

-11%

-10%

-25%

-1%

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900Temperature [°C]

N(CH3)3 m/z = 59

HCl m/z = 37

Cx Hy m/z = 26,42

H2O m/z = 18

CO2 m/z = 44

Inte

nsity

of m

ass

sign

alW

eigh

t los

s [%

]

DTA signal [uV/m

g]

exo

-9%dm/dT

500

m/z = 37

,

2

d-1.0

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

Fig. 11. TG–DTA/MS measurements performed on as-syn-

thesized SBA-3. Bottom: TGA data with a dashed line with its

first derivative curve (grey line), and the DTA curve with a solid

line. Top: various molecular species recorded from the MS and

their evolution with temperature.

F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29 21

Although the mass loss reached 35%, these com-bined processes do not seem to result in any

apparent change in the scattering contrasts or d-spacing values. Following this, the main exother-

mic process with the higher energy release takes

place between 300 and 400 �C (centered at 337± 2

�C), where the weight loss is 11%. Here, the strong

increase of all intensities at the same growth rate is

very likely caused by the rapid removal of carbon-rich species from the inside of the mesopores. The

major exothermic oxidation process occurs with

release of a large amount of CO2 and smaller

fragments of the carbon chain. The oxidation is

then completed by combustion of residual carbo-

naceous species (coke) and water release at higher

temperatures. Above 400 �C, the weight loss of 9%corresponds to the removal of carbonaceous spe-

cies at 450–550 �C and water losses via conden-

sation of silanol groups, and, at 600 �C, to high

temperature condensation of remaining silanol

groups. The total weight loss measured for SBA-3is about 55%.

Two main processes are evidenced: (1) low

temperature endothermic removal of HCl, water

and parts of the surfactant species with no ap-

parent structural change, and (2) oxidation and

combustion at higher temperature, leading to ra-

pid scattering contrast variations and contraction

of the hexagonal mesophase. It is, however, ques-tionable whether the first process could be as-

signed to the Hofmann degradation observed for

Cn-MCM-41 since the in situ XRD results do not

show the same drastic contrast variation and dif-

ferences in growth rate. Furthermore, the neutral

silica framework is less favorable for the base-

catalyzed Hofmann elimination of the trimethyl-

amine head group. Terminal silanol groups areprotonated so that the bulk composition of SBA-3

and MCM-41 made with the same surfactant are

distinctly different in hydrogen and halide ion

content, as supported by the TG/MS results. In

addition to the different chemical composition, one

has to consider at least two other factors that

might influence the thermal behavior of the hex-

agonal mesophase synthesized under acidic con-ditions: (1) thicker silica walls are suggested for

SBA-3 materials compared to those of MCM-41,

(2) the possible presence of disordered micropores

in the inorganic framework walls. Albouy et al.

[79] reported recently the presence of micropo-

rosity inside the walls of mesoporous hexagonal

phase silica synthesized under acidic conditions

with CTAB as a template. In another recent report,Lee et al. [80] emphasized the difference in porosity

observed between SBA-3 type materials and

MCM-41. They showed that in the case of a similar

hexagonal phase mesoporous silica, synthesized

with CTAB, replication of the structure into a

CMK-type carbon materials is possible, signifying

thus the presence of complementary pores in the

silica walls. The mesoporous channels are thereforesomewhat interconnected and the resulting CMK

replica retained an ordered structure, which is in

Page 22: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

22 F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29

strong contrast with replication of MCM-41 lead-

ing to nanofiber-like carbons. The evolution of the

scattering intensity of the low angle reflections is

governed by the contrast between the walls and the

inside of the pores, whereas the TG profiles depend

on the compositions and the interaction betweenthe matrix and the included species. The removal of

the template from as-synthesized SBA-3 is gov-

erned by the size of the surfactant species relative to

the size of the honeycomb mesopores and possible

framework micropores, and the strength of the

interaction between the template and the solid. The

presence of microporosity within the walls may

induce perturbation in the scattering contrast and adifferent phase cancellation behavior is expected

since the scattering density of the walls is not

constant. The origin of the pore connectivities or

wall microporosity is, however, still unclear. Never-

theless, one could propose that it is related to the

inherent nature of the silicate oligomeres resulting

from hydrolysis and condensation of TEOS at very

low pH, and the extent of cross-linking and densityof the silica network formed.

To reduce the damage caused by the removal of

the template by thermal treatment and reduce the

cost of the synthesis of mesoporous materials,

non-destructive solvent extraction techniques have

been developed. For mesoporous material ob-

tained according the SþI� route, the templating

species interact strongly with the inorganicframework via charge-balancing ionic interactions.

The destruction of this kind of interaction is rather

difficult to achieve by solvent extraction alone.

However, in the acid synthesized mesophase the

surfactant cationic charge is balanced by a halide

ion, which allows the template to be removed by

solvent extraction without providing any ex-

changeable cations [15].Extraction was therefore performed in pure

boiling ethanol according to the method proposed

by Tanev et al. [43]. The solvent extraction was

carried out twice, with a sample-to-extraction

media ratio of 1 g/150 ml, and subsequent washing

with ethanol. The TG–DTA measurements per-

formed on the extracted sample show a remaining

total weight loss of about 10–13%, indicating aremoval of �75–80% of the template by the ex-

traction. Therefore, the removal of the residual

template species still requires subsequent calcina-

tion.

The d(1 0 0) of the hexagonal mesophase of the

extracted sample is 3.81 nm, with aextracted ¼ 4:40nm, indicating a lattice contraction of 3%. Fig. 12a

shows the development of the XRD patternsduring calcination at 550 �C for 5 h of SBA-3 after

extraction in pure boiling ethanol. The constant

intensities of the low angle reflections support the

notion that a large amount of organics has been

removed from the pores. This confirms also that

the changes in intensity observed previously are

due to contrast variations. Fig. 12b shows that the

hexagonal lattice of the material after extractionundergoes linear shrinkage from 250 �C up to the

end of the calcination plateau, whereas the d-spacings of the as-synthesized SBA-3 mesophase

without extraction decrease strongly in a rapid

step at 250–300 �C. The d(1 0 0) of the extracted

mesophase is 3.3 nm after calcination, indicating a

lower shrinkage of about 14%, compared to a non-

extracted sample. The continuous large shrinkageobserved for the extracted sample suggests that the

exothermic reactions with high energy release are

not necessarily responsible for the lattice shrink-

age. Nevertheless, high heat effects may enhance

this contraction effect since the effective tempera-

ture of the sample might be substantially higher

than the oven temperature. Consequently, the

shrinkage of the hexagonal lattice is likely causedby successive condensations of the framework and

temperature-dependent structural rearrangements

of the framework.

3.2.2. SBA-15

Important progress in the preparation of mes-

oporous silicas was made by Zhao et al. [16], who

used triblock polyoxoalkylene copolymers (plu-ronic type) for the synthesis under acidic condi-

tions of large-pore materials called SBA-15 and

other related materials. Here the mechanism of

formation is proposed to be SþX�Iþ or (S0Hþ)

(X�Iþ) since the block-copolymer is positively

charged under the reaction conditions. In addition,

the shape of the mesopores is apparently more

cylindrical than the pores of MCM-41-type mate-rials that are generally considered to be hexagonal

[65].

Page 23: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.02 theta [°]

Inte

nsity

(a)

(b)

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

d-sp

acin

g [n

m]

RT150 250 350 450 550 550 150 RTTemperature [°C]

(100)(110)(200)

(100) (110) (200)

200°C400°C

550°C

550°C150°C

RT

RT

Fig. 12. (a) XRD patterns stack plot of SBA-3 obtained after extracted in pure ethanol. Shown are subsequent XRD patterns during

the calcination. (b) d-spacings of SBA-3 during calcination of an as-synthesized sample (open symbols) and an extracted sample (solid

symbols).

F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29 23

SBA-15 was synthesized with a hydrothermal

treatment applied at 90 �C during 24 h. As-syn-

thesized SBA-15 exhibits reflections indexed to the

p6m hexagonal symmetry at very low angles,

dð100Þ ¼ 10:49 nm indicative of a very large unit

cell with a ¼ 12:11 nm. The position of the re-

flections of the hexagonal phase at very low angle

renders the in situ XRD measurement difficult torealize due to the configuration of the sample

holder set up, and may induce large experimental

errors. To allow a measurement, the set up has

been changed from automatic divergence slit, as

was used so far, to a fixed slit configuration.

Furthermore, due to the large signal caused by the

primary beam at very low angle, the developing

in situ XRD patterns are corrected by subtraction

of the background measured with the empty Pt/Rh

band. The XRD powder diffraction pattern ob-

tained for as-synthesized SBA-15 is shown in Fig.

13. One can note that the intensity of the (1 1 0)

diffraction peak is lower than the intensity of

(2 0 0), with the I(1 1 0):I(2 0 0) intensity ratio being

about 0.8 (Fig. 13 inset). Fig. 13 illustrates thedevelopment of the XRD patterns during calci-

nation. Such in situ experiments are presented for

the first time in the case of a SBA-15 mesophase.

The in situ XRD patterns stack plot reveals very

interesting and new features compared to the pre-

viously described silica-based materials. A rapid

strong increase of all reflection intensities is

Page 24: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

2 theta [°]

Inte

nsity

1.7 2.7

1.0 2.0 3.0

x 8

x 8calcined

as-made

Inte

nsity

2 theta [°]

200300

400500

550550

55015045

RT

Fig. 13. XRD patterns stack plot obtained for SBA-15. Shown are subsequent XRD patterns as the material is calcined up to 550 �C,held at this temperature for 5 h and cooled to room temperature. Inset shows in detail the XRD patterns of SBA-15 before and after

calcination, respectively.

24 F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29

observed first up to 200 �C. Surprisingly, upon

further increase of the temperature up to 250 �C, arelative decrease in scattering contrast is then ob-

served. Following this, continuous increase in in-tensity is occurring at a slow growth rate, the

intensities reaching a maximum around 550 �C.This slow linear increase in intensity at higher

temperatures is accompanied with an observable

d-spacing shift. After calcination, the I(1 1 0):I(2 0 0) intensity ratio increases to about 1.4, which

is likely a result of increased framework wall

condensation [69]. On the other hand, the I(1 0 0):I(1 1 0) intensity ratio remains constant.

The graphs depicted in Fig. 14 show the detailed

evolution of the intensities of the low angle reflec-

tions during the calcination process, and the asso-

ciated changes in d-spacings. From the graphs, it is

clearly seen that all reflections follow an identical

evolution. A first increase is observed up to 200 �C,with no apparent shrinkage of the hexagonal lat-tice. From 200 to 250 �C, a substantial decrease in

intensity occurs without structural change in lattice

size. Above 250 �C, all the d-spacings shift linearlytowards lower values, up to at 550 �C. In parallel to

the lattice shrinkage, a progressive increase in

scattering contrast is observed up to 550 �C. Fromthis, changes are then less pronounced, the reflec-

tion intensities and d-spacings remaining relatively

constant.Upon cooling to room temperature, water

is physically adsorbed resulting in a slight lattice

expansion, as observed previously for other silica-

based mesostructures, and an observable new in-

crease in the reflection intensities. The unit cell

constant of calcined SBA-15 is 10.52 nm, indicatinga lattice shrinkage of about 13%.

From the TG–DTA/MS (Fig. 15) one can

conclude that the template removal from an as-

synthesized SBA-15 sample consists of a single

main step occurring at relatively low temperatures

(below 280 �C), followed by higher temperature

elimination of residual carbonaceous species. After

the removal of physisorbed water (4%) below 150�C in an endothermic process, the exothermic de-

composition of the organic template takes place in

Page 25: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

(a)

(b)

I(100) d(100)

RT 150 250 350 450 550 550 150 RTTemperature [°C]

Inte

nsity

8.5

9.0

9.5

10.0

10.5

11.0

I(110) I(200)

d(110) d(200)

RT 150 250 350 450 550 550 150 RTTemperature [°C]

Inte

nsity

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

Fig. 14. Graph showing the evolution of the reflection inten-

sities of SBA-15 as a function of temperature (calcination at 550

�C for 5 h). Also plotted are the d-spacing values of the re-

spective reflections (open symbols). Top: evolution of the (1 0 0)

reflection. Bottom: evolution of the (1 1 0) and (2 0 0) reflec-

tions. The connecting black solid lines are used as guide for the

eye.

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900Temperature [°C]

HCl m/z = 37

H2O m/z = 18

CO2 m/z = 44

Inte

nsity

of m

ass

sign

alW

eigh

t los

s [%

]

DTA signal [uV/m

g]

exo

-1.2-1.0-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.200.2

50

60

70

80

90

100

-10%

-42%

-4%

169°C

317°C

C3H6O2 m/z = 74

C3H6O m/z = 58

Fig. 15. TG–DTA/MS measurements performed on as-made

P123/SBA-15. Bottom: TGA data with a dashed line and the

DTA curve with a solid line. Top: various molecular species

recorded from the MS measurements and their evolution with

temperature.

F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29 25

one step between 150 and 280 �C with a weight loss

of 42%. During this exothermic step (DTA peak

centered at 169± 2 �C), all fragments assigned to

block-copolymer fragments (m=z ¼ 42, 58, 74),

HCl (m=z ¼ 37) and water are detected simulta-

neously in the MS. The marked exothermic effect

and important weight loss below 200 �C (32%) areto be associated with the strong increase in scat-

tering contrast observed in the in situ XRD ex-

periments. Furthermore, one can note that all MS

peaks are relatively narrow between 150 and 200

�C. However, a broadening of the peaks attributed

to CO2 and water is clearly seen between 200 and

280 �C. During this temperature range, a weight

loss of about 10% is measured. This observabledelayed removal of CO2 and water is related to the

range of temperature where a decrease in intensity

is detected. Subsequently, between 280 and 400 �C,another weight loss of 10% is measured, with anexothermic sharp peak maximum at 317± 2 �C,assigned to the removal of water and residual

carbonaceous species (m=z ¼ 18 and 44). The total

weight loss measured is about 56%, as reported

before [16,30,47].

The first major step is the complete decompo-

sition and combined combustion of the organics.

Large amounts of organic template are removedfrom the inside of the pores leading to a strong

increase in scattering contrast between the walls

and the mesopores. During this step, part of the

organic template is converted into carbonaceous

Page 26: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

26 F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29

species. The temperature of this decomposition

process is lower than the temperature at which the

pure P123 decomposes (about 210 �C) [30], and

substantially lower than the oxidative decomposi-

tion temperature observed for the cationic surf-

actants. The delayed removal of CO2 and watermight be caused by the decomposition or oxida-

tion of species located in the complementary pores

known to be present in SBA-15 framework walls.

The behavior of the scattering contrast is strongly

dependent on the structure of the walls and the size

of the pores. In other terms, the scattering power

depends on the electron density contrast between

the different moieties of the unit cell. It has beenrecently demonstrated that the large structural

mesopores of SBA-15 are accompanied by disor-

dered micropores or mesopores located within the

silica pore walls, likely providing connectivity be-

tween the ordered large-pore channels [48,81–84].

Interestingly, Galarneau et al. [85] showed pre-

cisely in a very recent report that the nature of the

complementary porosity is strongly depending onthe synthesis conditions. They elucidated the po-

rous topology of SBA-15 samples synthesized at

different temperatures, using TEM images of Pt

replicas and low pressure Ar adsorption. They

concluded the presence of a secondary porosity

with pore diameter larger than 1.5 nm bridging

the structural mesopore channels only in the

case of materials synthesized at temperatures>80 �C. Below this temperature, ultramicropo-

rosity (<1 nm) is usually observed as a corona

around the mesopores, with no clear evidence of

porous bridges connecting the channels. In our

case (90 �C), the presence of such complementary

bridging pores in the walls may influence the

scattering density of the framework. As the dis-

tribution of matter in the pores in the walls and themesopores is temperature dependent, unexpected

contrast behavior might take place with possible

phase cancellation. Consequently, the change in

scattering contrast occurring when CO2 and water

are removed does not seem to be caused by the

elimination of species located within the large pore

channels, but more likely to species that were

found in the bridging complementary pores of theframework walls. The subsequent broader step

corresponds to the removal of coke by combus-

tion, and to the dehydroxylation of silanols. In this

second step, a peak appears at about 315 �C where

more water is released, with traces of HCl. Of note

is that the condensation of silanol to form siloxane

has been generally suggested to occur at higher

temperatures in the case of mesophases synthe-sized with cationic surfactants (400–600 �C)[22,71]. During this broad step, the scattering in-

tensities reach progressively their maximal values.

The final scattering increase observed is probably

caused by re-adsorption of water, which might

undergo preferential condensation in the smaller

pores (micropores and small mesopores) located in

the thick walls of SBA-15.The removal of the template is shown to be very

different from that of MCM-41 or SBA-3 synthe-

sized with low molecular weight surfactants.

Most of high molecular weight non-ionic tem-

plate is removed from mesostructured SBA-15

at lower temperatures, between 150 and 250 �C,in a single oxidation step. No contraction of the

unit cell is observed during this process. Solovyovet al. [65] showed recently that the block-copoly-

mer surfactant is distributed more uniformly

within the large cylindrical mesopores of SBA-15,

than CTAB in MCM-41 or MCM-48. These ob-

servations suggest that the block-copolymer tem-

plate is likely involved in a different type of

interaction with the silica surface. The inorganic

framework seems to catalyze the thermal decom-position and oxidation of the block copolymer at

low temperatures in the presence of oxygen, since

the decomposition is strongly delayed under ni-

trogen [47]. Residual carbonaceous species and

water are then removed from the structure upon

heating at higher temperatures, from 300 �C up to

550 �C. During this subsequent process a large

contraction of the hexagonal unit cell is ob-served, possibly due to further framework con-

densation. The presence of additional framework

porosity or connectivities between the mesopore

channels seems to be responsible for the strong

scattering contrast variations observed during the

thermal treatment. In addition, differences in sur-

face roughness have to be taken into account

when comparing SBA-15 with the other typesof mesoporous materials described in this study

[63].

Page 27: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29 27

4. Conclusions

The XRD studies showed the changes in scat-

tering contrast, observed for the low angle reflec-

tions, occurring when the template is removed.Differences in scattering contrast variations and

chemical reactions involved are observed for meso-

porous silicas depending on the synthesis conditions

and type of surfactant, which highlight the role of

the silica–surfactant interfaces. For all samples, a

strong increase in scattering contrast is evidenced,

thus resulting in increasing reflection intensities

upon removal of the templating agent. The removalof the surfactant, in the case of Si-MCM-41 or

Si-MCM-48, occurs by a stepwise mechanism. The

first step of the template decomposition via Hof-

mann degradation is confirmed for all MCM-41

samples synthesized with n-alkyltrimethylammo-

nium surfactants and MCM-48, with however, dif-

ferent proportions of the organics involved in

the temperature-dependent processes. The use ofsurfactants with different chain lengths underlines

the effects of the surfactant-surface interactions

and to a lower extent, the probable role of the pore

size on the thermal desorption of the decomposed

organics. Possible mass transfer limitations for

the diffusion of larger hydrocarbon species may be

suggested. The temperature at which the different

alkylammonium surfactants are removed may serveto probe the strength of the interactions considered.

Furthermore, the exchange of the surfactant trime-

thylammonium head group for a pyridinium group

stresses the determining influence of the interactions

of the polar head group and the inorganic surface

during thermal treatment. Materials synthesized

following the acidic route show different behaviors

depending on the type of template employed. De-spite having thicker walls, the materials obtained via

the acidic synthesis route show the highest lattice

shrinkage, which may be related to the nature of the

framework walls. Moreover, the presence of com-

plementary wall microporosity or porous bridges

connecting the mesopore channels seems to greatly

influence the XRD scattering contrast behavior

and the processes of the thermal desorption of theorganics. Finally, the SBA-15 framework catalyzes

the oxidation of the block copolymer template spe-

cies at low temperatures.

Acknowledgements

The European Community (project HPRN-CT-

99-00025) is gratefully acknowledged for financial

supports. F.K. wishes to thank Dr. C. Weident-haler, Dr. F. Marlow (MPI M€uulheim), and Dr. M.

Lind�een (�AAbo Akademi, Finland) for helpful and

stimulating discussions.

References

[1] C.T. Kresge, M.E. Leonowicz, W.J. Roth, J.C. Vartuli, J.S.

Beck, Nature 359 (1992) 710.

[2] T. Yanagisawa, T. Shimizu, K. Kuroda, C. Kato, Bull.

Chem. Soc. Jpn. 63 (1990) 988.

[3] A. Corma, Chem. Rev. 97 (1997) 2373.

[4] M. Lind�een, S. Schacht, F. Sch€uuth, A. Steel, K.K. Unger,

J. Porous Mater. 5 (1998) 177.

[5] U. Ciesla, F. Sch€uuth, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 27 (1999)

131.

[6] J.Y. Ying, C.P. Mehnert, M.S. Wong, Angew. Chem. Int.

Ed. Engl. 38 (1999) 56.

[7] F. Sch€uuth, A. Wingen, J. Sauer, Micropor. Mesopor.

Mater. 44–45 (2001) 465.

[8] K.K. Unger, D. Kumar, M. Gr€uun, G. B€uuchel, S. L€uudtke,

Th. Adam, K. Schumacher, S. Renker, J. Chromatogr. A

892 (2000) 47.

[9] M. Vallet-Regi, A. R�aamila, R.P. del Real, J. P�eerez-

Pariente, Chem. Mater. 13 (2001) 308.

[10] R.C. Hayward, P. Alberius-Henning, B.F. Chmelka,

G.D. Stucky, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 44–45 (2001)

619.

[11] F. Sch€uuth, W. Schmidt, Adv. Mater. 14 (2002) 629.

[12] G. Wirnsberger, P. Yang, B.J. Scott, B.F. Chmelka, G.D.

Stucky, Spectrochim. Acta A 57 (2001) 2049.

[13] B.J. Scott, G. Wirnsberger, G.D. Stucky, Chem. Mater. 13

(2001) 3140.

[14] J.S. Beck, J.C. Vartuli, W.J. Roth, M.E. Leonowicz, C.T.

Kresge, K.D. Schmitt, C.T.-W. Chu, D.H. Olson, E.W.

Sheppard, S.B. McCullen, J.B. Higgins, J.L. Schlenker, J.

Am. Chem. Soc. 114 (1992) 10834.

[15] Q. Huo, D.I. Margolese, U. Ciesla, D.G. Demuth, P.

Feng, T.E. Gier, P. Sieger, A. Firouzi, B.F. Chmelka, F.

Sch€uuth, G.D. Stucky, Chem. Mater. 6 (1994) 1176.

[16] D. Zhao, J. Feng, Q. Huo, N. Melosh, G.H. Frederickson,

B.F. Chmelka, G.D. Stucky, Science 279 (1998) 548.

[17] J.C. Vartuli, K.D. Schmitt, C.T. Kresge, W.J. Roth, M.E.

Leonowicz, S.B. McCullen, S.D. Hellring, J.S. Beck, J.L.

Schlenker, D.H. Olson, E.W. Sheppard, Chem. Mater. 6

(1994) 2317.

[18] N.K. Raman, M.T. Anderson, C.J. Brinker, Chem. Mater.

8 (1996) 1682.

[19] F. Kleitz, W. Schmidt, F. Sch€uuth, Micropor. Mesopor.

Mater. 44–45 (2001) 95.

Page 28: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

28 F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29

[20] J. Blanchard, P. Trens, M. Hudson, F. Sch€uuth, Micropor.

Mesopor. Mater. 39 (2000) 163.

[21] F. Sch€uuth, U. Ciesla, S. Schacht, M. Thieme, Q. Huo, G.

Stucky, Mater. Res. Bull. 34 (1999) 483.

[22] C.-Y. Chen, H.-X. Li, M.E. Davis, Micropor. Mater. 2

(1993) 17.

[23] M. Soulard, S. Bilger, H. Kessler, J.L. Guth, Zeolites 11

(1991) 107.

[24] A. Fonseca, J.B. Nagy, J. El Hage-Al Asswad, R.

Mostowicz, F. Crea, F. Testa, Zeolites 15 (1995) 259.

[25] L.M. Parker, D.M. Bibby, J.E. Patterson, Zeolites 4 (1984)

168.

[26] O. Kresnawahjuesa, D.H. Olson, R.J. Gorte, G.H. K€uuhl,

Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 51 (2002) 175.

[27] K.O. Kongshaug, H. Fjellv�aag, B. Klewe, K.P. Lillerud,

Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 39 (2000) 333.

[28] A. Corma, V. Forn�ees, M.T. Navarro, J. P�eerez-Pariente, J.

Catal. 148 (1994) 569.

[29] M.T.J. Keene, R.D.M. Gougeon, R. Denoyel, R.H.

Harris, J. Rouquerol, P.L. Llewellyn, J. Mater. Chem. 9

(1999) 2843.

[30] D. Zhao, Q. Huo, J. Feng, B.F. Chmelka, G.D. Stucky, J.

Am. Chem. Soc. 120 (1998) 6024.

[31] F. Sch€uuth, Chem. Mater. 13 (2001) 3184.

[32] U. Ciesla, M. Fr€ooba, G.D. Stucky, F. Sch€uuth, Chem.

Mater. 11 (1999) 227.

[33] D. Trong On, Langmuir 15 (1999) 8561.

[34] D. Khushalani, G.A. Ozin, A. Kuperman, J. Mater. Chem.

9 (1999) 1491.

[35] F. Kleitz, S.J. Thomson, Z. Liu, O. Terasaki, F. Sch€uuth,

Chem. Mater. 14 (2002) 4134.

[36] C. Serre, M. Hervieu, C. Magnier, F. Taulelle, G. F�eerey,

Chem. Mater. 14 (2002) 180.

[37] G.J. de A.A. Solar-Illia, A. Louis, C. Sanchez, Chem.

Mater. 14 (2002) 750.

[38] P. Yang, D. Zhao, D.I. Margolese, B.F. Chmelka, G.D.

Stucky, Chem. Mater. 11 (1999) 2813.

[39] P.T. Tanev, T.J. Pinnavaia, Science 267 (1995) 865.

[40] S. Hitz, R. Prins, J. Catal. 168 (1997) 194.

[41] F. Sch€uuth, Ber. Bunsen.-Ges. Phys. Chem. 99 (1995) 1306.

[42] S. Kawi, M.W. Lai, Chem. Commun. (1998) 1407.

[43] P.T. Tanev, T.J. Pinnavaia, Chem. Mater. 8 (1996) 2068.

[44] D.M. Antonelli, J.Y. Ying, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.

35 (1996) 426.

[45] D.M. Antonelli, A. Nakahira, J.Y. Ying, Inorg. Chem. 35

(1996) 3126.

[46] D.M. Antonelli, J.Y. Ying, Chem. Mater. 8 (1996) 874.

[47] M. Kruk, M. Jaroniec, C.H. Ko, R. Ryoo, Chem. Mater.

12 (2000) 1961.

[48] Z. Liu, O. Terasaki, T. Ohsuna, K. Hiraga, H.J. Shin, R.

Ryoo, Chem. Phys. Chem. 4 (2001) 229.

[49] M.T.J. Keene, R. Denoyel, P.L. Llewellyn, Chem. Com-

mun. (1998) 2203.

[50] G. B€uuchel, R. Denoyel, P.L. Llewellyn, J. Rouquerol, J.

Mater. Chem. 11 (2001) 589.

[51] T. Clarck Jr., J.D. Ruiz, H. Fan, C.J. Brinker, B.I.

Swanson, A.N. Parikh, Chem. Mater. 12 (2000) 3879.

[52] G. B€uuchel, P. Llewelyn, Private communication.

[53] M. Gr€uun, I. Lauer, K.K. Unger, Adv. Mater. 9 (1997) 254.

[54] M. Gr€uun, K.K. Unger, A. Matsumoto, K. Tsutsumi,

Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 27 (1999) 207.

[55] M. Fr€ooba, R. K€oohn, G. Bouffaud, O. Richard, G. van

Tendeloo, Chem. Mater. 11 (1999) 2858.

[56] A. Hahn, T. Ressler, R.E. Jentoft, F.C. Jentoft, Chem.

Commun. (2001) 537.

[57] F. Kleitz, Ph.D. Thesis, Ruhr-Universit€aat, Bochum.

[58] F. Kleitz, W. Schmidt, in: E. Kapsch, M. Hollering (Eds.),

Gekoppelte Techniken in der Thermischen Analyse, SKT,

2001, pp. 159–168.

[59] R. Zana, J. Frasch, M. Soulard, B. Lebeau, J. Patarin,

Langmuir 15 (1999) 2603.

[60] B. Marler, U. Oberhagemann, S. Vortmann, H. Gies,

Micropor. Mater. 6 (1996) 375.

[61] W. Hammond, E. Prouzet, S.D. Manhati, T.J. Pinnavaia,

Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 27 (1999) 19.

[62] Z. Tun, P.C. Mason, Acta Cryst. A 56 (2000) 536.

[63] J. Sauer, F. Marlow, F. Sch€uuth, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.

3 (2001) 1.

[64] L.A. Solovyov, S.D. Kirik, A.N. Shmakov, V.N. Roman-

nikov, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 44–45 (2001) 17.

[65] L.A. Solovyov, O.V. Belousov, A.N. Shmakov, V.I.

Zaikovskii, S.H. Joo, R. Ryoo, E. Haddad, A. Gedeon,

S.D. Kirik, in: Proceedings of IMMS2002, Stud. Surf. Sci.

Catal. 146 (2003) 299.

[66] L. Chen, T. Horiuchi, T. Mori, K. Maeda, J. Phys. Chem.

B 103 (1999) 1216.

[67] S. Biz, M.G. White, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 40 (2000)

159.

[68] Q. Huo, D.I. Margolese, G.D. Stucky, Chem. Mater. 8

(1996) 1147.

[69] M. Lind�een, J. Blanchard, S. Schacht, S. Schunk, F. Sch€uuth,

Chem. Mater. 11 (1999) 3002.

[70] M. Kruk, M. Jaroniec, Y. Sakamoto, O. Terasaki, R.

Ryoo, C.H. Ko, J. Phys. Chem. B 104 (2000) 292.

[71] X.S. Zhao, C.Q. Lu, A.K. Whittaker, G.J. Millar, H.Y.

Zhu, J. Phys. Chem. B 101 (1997) 6525.

[72] M. Jaroniec, M. Kruk, H.J. Shin, R. Ryoo, Y. Sakam-

oto, O. Terasaki, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 48 (2001)

127.

[73] D. Khushalani, A. Kuperman, N. Coombs, G.A. Ozin,

Chem. Mater. 8 (1996) 2188.

[74] M. Morey, A. Davidson, G.D. Stucky, Micropor. Mater. 6

(1996) 99.

[75] M. Kruk, M. Jaroniec, R. Ryoo, S.H. Joo, Chem. Mater.

12 (2000) 1414.

[76] A.A. Romero, M.D. Alba, J. Klinowski, J. Phys. Chem. B

102 (1998) 123.

[77] M. Kruk, M. Jaroniec, M.L. Pena, F. Rey, Chem. Mater.

14 (2002) 4434.

[78] S. Schacht, Q. Huo, I.G. Voigt-Martin, G.D. Stucky, F.

Sch€uuth, Science 273 (1996) 768.

[79] P.-A. Albouy, A. Ayral, Chem. Mater. 14 (2002) 3391.

[80] J.-S. Lee, S.H. Joo, R. Ryoo, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (2002)

1156.

Page 29: Calcination Behavior of Different Surfactant-templated Mesostructured Silica Materials

F. Kleitz et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 65 (2003) 1–29 29

[81] C.H. Ko, R. Ryoo, M. Kruk, V. Antochshuk, M. Jaroniec,

J. Phys. Chem. B 104 (2000) 11465.

[82] M. Imp�eerior-Clerc, P. Davidson, A. Davidson, J. Am.

Chem. Soc. 122 (2000) 11925.

[83] P.I. Ravikovitch, A.V. Neimark, J. Phys. Chem. B 105

(2001) 6817.

[84] S.H. Joo, R. Ryoo, M. Kruk, M. Jaroniec, J. Phys. Chem.

B 106 (2002) 4640.

[85] A. Galarneau, H. Cambon, F. DiRenzo, R. Ryoo, M.

Choi, F. Fajula, New J. Chem. 27 (2003) 73.

[86] M. Kruk, M. Jaroniec, A. Sayari, Chem. Mater. 11 (1999)

492.