caep epp annual report for 2015 16 academic year · caep epp annual report for 2015‐16 academic...
TRANSCRIPT
APRIL14,2017
CAEPEPPANNUALREPORTFOR2015‐16ACADEMICYEAR
COLLEGEOFEDUCATION:
SCHOOLOFLEARNINGANDTEACHING
P a g e 1 | 87
P a g e 2 | 87
TABLEOFCONTENTSWelcomeLetter......................................................................................................................................................................................4
BasicInformation................................................................................................................................................................................6
EPPCharacteristicsandAffiliations..........................................................................................................................................6
IndividualContactInformation....................................................................................................................................................6
ProgramOptions...................................................................................................................................................................................7
AdvancedPrograms...........................................................................................................................................................................7
Education&Learning.......................................................................................................................................................................7
ElementaryEducation&EnglishLanguageLearning.........................................................................................................7
MasterofArtsinTeaching..............................................................................................................................................................8
MasterofArtsinTeaching–SpecialEducation.....................................................................................................................8
FacultyInformation.............................................................................................................................................................................8
2017EPPAnnualReport(for2015‐16AcademicYear)..............................................................................................12
Section1:AIMSProfile................................................................................................................................................................12
Section2:ProgramCompleters............................................................................................................................................12
Section3:SubstantiveChanges..............................................................................................................................................12
Section4:DisplayofCandidatePerformanceData.....................................................................................................13
TestScores–Unit–DescriptiveStatistics.......................................................................................................................13
TestScoresbyProgram–DescriptiveStatistics............................................................................................................14
EugeneCampusTeacherInquiryProject–DescriptiveStatistics..........................................................................16
ForestGroveCampusTeacherInquiryProjects–DescriptiveStatistics............................................................17
EugeneCampusStudentTeacherSummaryEvaluation1........................................................................................17
EugeneandWoodburnCampusesStudentTeacherSummaryEvaluation2.....................................................18
ForestGroveCampusStudentTeacherSummaryEvaluation1.............................................................................19
ForestGroveCampusStudentTeacherSummaryEvaluation2.............................................................................20
UndergraduateWorkSampleEvaluation1.....................................................................................................................21
UndergraduateWorkSampleEvaluation2.....................................................................................................................21
SpecialEducationTeacherInquiryProject1..................................................................................................................22
SpecialEducationTeacherInquiryProject2..................................................................................................................23
SpecialEducationUndergraduateWorkSample1.......................................................................................................24
SpecialEducationUndergraduateWorkSample2.......................................................................................................24
edTPAScores–Unit–DescriptiveStatistics...................................................................................................................25
edTPAScoresbyProgram–DescriptiveStatistics.......................................................................................................26
Section5:NotRequiredfor2015‐16AcademicYear.................................................................................................26
Section6:AreasforImprovement,Weaknesses,and/orStipulations...........................................................27
AreasforImprovementrelatedtoStandard1...............................................................................................................27
P a g e 3 | 87
AreasforImprovementrelatedtoStandard4...............................................................................................................27
Section7:AccreditationPathway.........................................................................................................................................28
SelectedImprovement..............................................................................................................................................................28
Appendices.......................................................................................................................................................................................30
EugeneCampusTeacherInquiryProjectRubric..........................................................................................................30
ForestGroveCampusTeacherInquiryProjectRubric...............................................................................................38
SpecialEducationWorkSampleRubric............................................................................................................................45
StudentTeachingSummaryEvaluation(v.2007).........................................................................................................49
StudentTeachingSummaryEvaluation(v.2014).........................................................................................................72
P a g e 4 | 87
CAEPEPPANNUALREPORTFOR2015‐16ACADEMICYEARWhatshouldteachingandlearninglook,soundandfeellikeinthe21stcenturyandbeyond?
Whatisthecutting‐edgeresearchandpracticeinspeech‐languagepathology?
Howcanpractitioners,teachersandleadersbeinterconnectedlocallyandglobally?
Thesearethekindsofquestionsthatweneedtobeaskingasasociety—andthatweexploreinthePacificUniversityCollegeofEducation.
Ourgoalistodesignlearningexperiencesthatarereal‐worldfocused,rigorous,practice‐based,andpersonallymeaningful.Weprideourselvesondevelopingteachers,schoolleadersandspeech‐languagepathologistswhoareprofoundlyskilledatwhattheydoandwhoarepreparedtohelpdefinewhatthefutureshouldbe.
WehavetwoschoolswithintheCollegeofEducation:theSchoolofCommunicationSciencesandDisordersandtheSchoolofLearningandTeaching.
TheSchoolofCommunicationSciencesandDisordersoffersaMasterofSciencedegreeinspeech‐languagepathology.TheprogramhasbeenawardedcandidacybytheCouncilonAcademicAccreditationinAudiologyandSpeech‐LanguagePathology(CAA)oftheAmericanSpeech‐Language‐HearingAssociation.CSDalsooffersanundergraduateminorincommunicationsciencesanddisorders,aswellasapost‐baccalaureateprerequisitesequenceforthosepreparingforthemaster’sprogram.
TheSchoolofLearningandTeachingoffersundergraduateeducationmajorandlicensureprograms,aswellasprogramsleadingtomaster’sdegrees,andnon‐degreeprogramsforteacherswhowishtoaddendorsementsand/orauthorizationstoexistinglicenses.ThemajorityofstudentsseekanOregonInitialTeachingLicensethroughoneoftheseprograms,whichareofferedatPacific’scampusesinEugene,WoodburnandForestGrove.OurlicensureprogramsareCouncilfortheAccreditationofEducatorPreparationaccredited.
PacificprofessorsactivelyworkwithschooldistrictpartnersaroundOregon,particularlythoseclosetoourEugene,WoodburnandForestGrovecampuses.
P a g e 5 | 87
Asweseektomeettheneedsofarapidlychangingworld,wealsopartnerwithmanyorganizations.WeareinstitutionalmembersoftheAmericanAssociationforCollegesofTeacherEducation,OregonLatinoAdministratorsAssociation,theOregonIndependentCollegeAssociation,theOregonAssociationofTeacherEducators,andfoundingpartnersoftheLaneCountyTeacherPathwaysprogram.
Ourfacultymembersareleadersinmanystateandnationaldiscipline‐basedorganizations:InternationalReadingAssociation,NationalCouncilofTeachersofMathematics,NationalCouncilfortheSocialStudies,NationalAssociationfortheEducationofYoungChildren,NationalAssociationforGiftedChildren,NationalAssociationofSpecialEducationTeachers,AmericanEducationalResearchAssociation,andInternationalSocietyforTechnologyinEducation
Everythingbeginswithagreatteacher,andyoucanbeassuredthat,ifyoujoinus,youwillbeimmersedinagroupofexperienced,vibrant,thoughtful,andtalentedfacultymemberswhowillcoachandmentoryoualongthewaytobethekindofteacher,schoolleaderorspeech‐languagepathologistthattheworldneedsandthatyouwanttobe.
Dr.LeifGustavsonDean,CollegeofEducation
P a g e 6 | 87
CAEPEPPAnnualReportSubmittedApril13,2017
CouncilfortheAccreditationofEducatorPreparation(CAEP)AnnualReportforPacificUniversityCollegeofEducation
BasicInformation:
PacificUniversityCollegeofEducation2043CollegeWayForestGrove,OR97116Phone:503‐352‐1437Fax:503‐352‐1463Website:www.pacificu.edu/coe
EPPCharacteristics&Affiliations:TeacherPreparationLevels
Currentlyofferinginitialteacherpreparationprograms:YesCurrentlyofferingadvancededucatorpreparationprograms:Yes
EPPTypeIHE‐ST—InstitutionofHigherEducation:State/Regional
ReligiousAffiliationsUndenominational
LanguageofInstruction EnglishInstitutionalAccreditation(Affiliations) Other:NorthwestCommissiononCollegesandUniversities(NWCCU)BranchCampuses/Sites EugeneCampus:40E.Broadway,Suite250,Eugene,OR97401 ForestGroveCampus:2043CollegeWay,ForestGrove,OR97116 WoodburnCampus:124W.LincolnSt.,Woodburn,OR97017
IndividualContactInformation:CEOName:Dr.LesleyHallick|[email protected]|503‐352‐2205EPPHeadName:Dr.LeifGustavson,Dean|[email protected]|503‐352‐14311stCAEPCoordinator:Dr.KevinCarr,Director|[email protected]|503‐352‐14432ndCAEPCoordinator:Ms.JenniferBridgewater|[email protected]|503‐352‐1433
ProgramOptions:
AdvancedPrograms
P a g e 7 | 87
PacificUniversity'sAdvancedProgramsareorganizedinsuchawaythatcandidateshaveavarietyofchoices.Candidateswithabachelor'sdegreeineducationcanearnaMasterofEducationdegreewithcorecontentandaspecialization:readingspecialist,teachingEnglishtoSpeakersofOtherLanguages(ESOL),talentedandgifted,technology,specialeducation,orcurriculumandinstruction.Candidatesalreadyholdingamaster'sdegreeandalicensecancompletethesespecializationsand/oraddotherendorsementsasanon‐degreestudent.
EducationandLearningTheBachelorofArtsinEducationandLearningprogramforpreliminarylicensureinElementaryMultipleSubjectsorSpecialEducation:Generalistincludesasequenceoffoundationalcourses,specificmethodologycoursesincoremultiplesubjectsorspecialeducationcontent,generalmethodscourses,fieldexperience,andaculminating18‐weekstudentteachingexperience.Studentscompleteexperiencesattwofocusedexperiences:earlychildhood/elementary,elementary/middleandPk‐12SpecialEducation(academicandfunctionalexperiences).Allcandidatesmusttakeandpassthecontentareatestsappropriatetotheirendorsement.CandidatesforthemultiplesubjectsendorsementtaketheNESElementaryEducationSubtestIandSubtestIItestsandcandidatesfortheSpecialEducationendorsementtaketheNESSpecialEducationtestasrequiredfortheOregonPreliminaryTeachingLicense.Thosepursuingamiddlegradessinglesubjectendorsementmustalsotakeandpassatleastoneofthefourcoremiddle‐levelsubjectexams:basicmath,socialstudies,science,andlanguagearts.Asanalternative,middle‐levelendorsementcandidatescanmeetthemiddlelevelsubjectareasbytakingandpassingoneoftheexamsrequiredtoteachatthehighschoollevel.AllprogramcompletersmustalsocompletethestaterequiredProtectingStudentandCivilRightsintheEducationalEnvironmentandtheedTPA.
ElementaryEducationandEnglishLanguageLearningBachelorofEducation(B.Ed.)‐‐ElementaryEducationandEnglishLanguageLearningisofferedattwoPacificUniversitycampuses(EugeneandWoodburn)duringthefall,spring,andsummersemesters.TheB.Ed.‐ElementaryEducationandEnglishLanguageLearningprogramisafull‐timecohortprogramconsistingofdaytimecourses,clinicalfieldwork,andstudentteaching.AllB.Ed.‐ElementaryEducationandEnglishLanguageLearningcandidatescomplete18weeksoffull‐timestudentteaching.CandidatestakeandpasstheNESElementaryEducationSubtestI,SubtestIIandESOLcontentexamspriortocompletingtheirprogram.TheBachelorofEducation(B.Ed.)‐‐ElementaryEducationandEnglishLanguageLearningprogramallowscandidatestobeauthorizedtoteachatP‐12inmultiplesubjectsorESOLendorsementareas.AllprogramcompletersmustalsocompletethestaterequiredProtectingStudentandCivilRightsintheEducationalEnvironmentandtheedTPA.
P a g e 8 | 87
MasterofArtsinTeachingMasterofArtsinTeaching(MAT)programsareofferedatthreePacificUniversitycampuses(Eugene,ForestGroveandWoodburn)duringthefall,spring,andsummersemesters.TheMAT/5thYearformatisafull‐timecohortprogramconsistingofcourseworkandclinicalpractice.TheMAT/Flexformat,alsoacohortmodel,offerscoursesintheeveningandweekendsandissuitableforpart‐timestudentswithfamilyoremploymentobligations.AllMATcandidatescompleteaminimumof18weeksoffull‐timestudentteaching.TheMasterofArtsinTeachingprogrampreparescandidatestoteachP‐12studentswithendorsement(s)inoneormorespecialtyareas(e.g.,elementarymultiplesubjects,singlesubjectcontentareas,ESOL,etc.).AllprogramcompletersmustalsocompletethestaterequiredProtectingStudentandCivilRightsintheEducationalEnvironmentandtheedTPA.
MasterofArtsinTeaching–SpecialEducationMasterofArtsinTeaching(MAT)‐‐SpecialEducationisofferedattwoPacificUniversitycampuses(EugeneandForestGrove)duringthefall,spring,andsummersemesters.TheMAT‐SpecialEducationprogramisapart‐timecohortprogramconsistingofcourseworkandclinicalpractice.AllMAT‐SpecialEducationcandidatescomplete18weeksoffull‐timestudentteaching.Candidatestakeandpassthespecialeducationcontentexampriortocompletingtheirprogram.TheMasterofArtsinTeaching‐‐SpecialEducationprogrampreparescandidatestoteachP‐12students..AllprogramcompletersmustalsocompletethestaterequiredProtectingStudentandCivilRightsintheEducationalEnvironmentandtheedTPA.
FacultyInformation:
MarkBailey,PhDDegree:PhD,EducationalPsychology,UniversityofWisconsin‐MadisonMajor:HumanDevelopmentMinor:Curriculum&InstructionAssignment:CoordinatorofMATECE/ELEMprogramforForestGrovecampus;Directorof
theChildLearning&DevelopmentCenter;teachesdevelopmentalpsychology,ECE/ELEMmethods,generalmethods;supervisesstudentteachers
FacultyRank:Professor–Tenured
KevinCarr,PhDDegree:PhD,ScienceEducation,UniversityofIdaho
P a g e 9 | 87
Assignment:DirectorandCoordinatoroftheMATSTEMprogramattheWoodburncampus;CoordinatestheNationalScienceFoundationNoyceScholarshipprogram;teachesscienceeducationcourses;supervisesstudentteachers
FacultyRank:Professor‐Tenured
MikeCharles,PhD
Degree:PhD,Curriculum&InstructionwithemphasisinEducationalMediaandComputers,ArizonaStateUniversity
Assignment:CoordinatestheBachelorofArtsEducation&LearningprogramattheForestGrovecampus.Teachestechnology,mathandsciencemethodsandfoundationcourses;supervisesstudentteachers
FacultyRank:Professor–Tenured
LeifGustavson,PhD
Degree:PhD,Education,UniversityofPennsylvaniaAssignment:Dean,CollegeofEducationFacultyRank:Professor
DanielKirk,PhD
PhD,Education,UniversityofGeorgiaAssignment:DirectorofForestGrovecampusSchoolofLearningandTeachingFacultyRank:AssociateProfessor
DonnaKalmbach‐Phillips,PhD
Degree:PhD,Education,OregonStateUniversityAssignment:WoodburnB.Ed.programcoordinator;teachesresearchcoursesto
undergraduatestudentsandlanguageartsandreadingcoursestograduatestudents;supervisesstudentteachers
FacultyRank:Professor‐Tenured
RebeccaLynn,EdD
Degree:EdD,EducationalLeadership:Curriculum&Instruction,PortlandStateUniversityAssignment:EugenecampusSpecialEducationProgramCoordinator;teacheslanguage
acquisitiontoundergraduatesandspecialeducationcoursestograduatestudentsontheEugenecampus;supervisesstudentteachers
FacultyRank:AssociateProfessor
AnnMatschiner,MST
P a g e 10 | 87
Degree:MasterofScience+AdministrativeLicense;SpecialEducation,PortlandStateUniversity
Assignment:ProgramCoordinatorfortheMATSecondaryProgram;ProgramCoordinatorfortheMEDVisualFunctioninLearningprogramattheForestGroveCampus;ProgramCoordinatorfortheTalentedandGiftedSpecializationprogramforboththeEugeneandForestGrovecampuses;Teachesgeneralmethods,talentedandgifted,andclassroommanagementcourses;supervisesstudentteachers
FacultyRank:AssistantProfessor–ExtendedTerm
ChristineMacfarlane,PhDDegree:PhD,SpecialEducationandEducationalTechnology,UtahStateUniversityAssignment:ForestGroveCampusSpecialEducationProgramCoordinator;teachesspecial
educationcoursestoundergraduateandgraduatestudentsontheForestGrovecampus;supervisesstudentteachers
AnilOommen,MATDegree:MAT,EarlyChildhoodandElementaryEducation,PacificUniversityAssignment:EugeneB.Ed.programcoordinator.Teachesreadingandlanguageartsto
undergraduatestudents;teachesESOLandReadingendorsementcoursestograduatestudents;supervisesstudentteachers
FacultyRank:AssistantProfessor
RichardPaxton,PhDDegree:PhD,EducationalPsychology,UniversityofWashingtonAssignment:Teachesfoundation,educationalpsychology,andsocialstudiesspecial
methodscoursestoundergraduateandgraduatestudentsontheForestGrovecampus;supervisesstudentteachers
FacultyRank:Professor‐Tenured
MarkSeals,PhDDegree:PhD,ScienceEducation,PurdueUniversityAssignment:DirectorofEugenecampusSchoolofLearningandTeachingFacultyRank:Professor
MarkSzymanski,PhDDegree:PhD,EducationalPsychologywithspecialtyincognitivescienceandinstruction,
UniversityofWisconsin‐MadisonAssignment:Teachesdevelopmentalpsychologyandtechnologycoursestoundergraduate
andgraduatestudentsattheEugenecampus;supervisesstudentteachersFacultyRank:Professor–Tenured
KarrenTimmermans,PhD
P a g e 11 | 87
Degree:PhD,EarlyChildhood,Families&Literacy,UniversityofNorthCarolinaAssignment:ProgramCoordinatorforESOLandReadingSpecialistprogramsattheEugene
campus;teachesreadingandESOLcoursestoundergraduateandgraduatestudentsattheEugenecampus;supervisesstudentteachers
FacultyRank:AssociateProfessorToddTwyman,PhD
Degree:PhD,EducationalLeadershipwithemphasisonLearningAssessmentandSystemsPerformance,UniversityofOregon
Assignment:Teachesundergraduateandgraduatecoursesinappliedhumandevelopment,researchmethods,socialstudiesteachingmethods,assessmentandclassroommanagementcourses,supervisesstudentteachers
FacultyRank:AssociateProfessor
AnitaZijdemans‐Boudreau,PhDDegree:PhD,HumanDevelopmentandLearning&Technology,UniversityofTorontoAssignment:ProgramCoordinatorforMATFlexprogramontheForestGroveCampus;
teachesdevelopmentalpsychology,technology,andgeneralmethodologyandresearchclasses
FacultyRank:AssociateProfessor
P a g e 12 | 87
2017EPPAnnualReport(for2015‐16AcademicYear)
Section1:AIMSProfile1.1 InAIMS,thefollowinginformationiscurrentandaccurate:
1.1.1. ContactPersons: ☒Agree ☐Disagree
1.1.2. EPPCharacteristics: ☒Agree ☐Disagree
1.1.3. ProgramListings: ☒Agree ☐Disagree
Section2:ProgramCompleters2.1Howmanycandidatescompletedprogramsthatpreparedthemtoworkinpreschoolthrough
grade12settingsduringAcademicYear2015‐16? 2.1.1.Numberofcompletersinprogramsleadingtoinitialteachercertificationorlicensure:81 2.1.2.Numberofcompletersinadvancedprogramsorprogramsleadingtoadegree,
endorsementorsomeothercredentialthatpreparestheholdertoserveinP‐12schools:33 Totalnumberofprogramcompleters:1142.2IndicatewhethertheEPPiscurrentlyofferingaprogramorprogramsleadingtoinitialteacher
certificationorlicensure. ☒Yes,aprogram(orprograms)leadingtoinitialteachercertificationiscurrentlybeing
offered. ☐No,aprogram(orprograms)leadingtoinitialteachercertificationisnotcurrentlybeing
offered.Section3:SubstantiveChangesHaveanyofthefollowingsubstantivechangesoccurredatyoureducatorpreparationproviderorinstitution/organizationduringthe2015‐16academicyear?3.1 Changesinthepublishedmissionorobjectivesoftheinstitution/organizationortheEPP
☐Change ☒NoChange/NotApplicable
3.2 Theadditionofprogramsofstudyatadegreeorcredentialleveldifferentfromthosethatwereofferedwhenmostrecentlyaccredited
☐Change ☒NoChange/NotApplicable
3.3 Theadditionofcoursesorprogramsthatrepresentasignificantdeparture,intermsofeithercontentordelivery,fromthosethatwereofferedwhenmostrecentlyaccredited
☐Change ☒NoChange/NotApplicable
3.4 Acontractwithotherprovidersfordirectinstructionalservices,includinganyteach‐outagreements
☐Change ☒NoChange/NotApplicable
3.5 Changeinregionalaccreditationstatus
P a g e 13 | 87
☐Change ☒NoChange/NotApplicable
3.6 Changeinstateprogramapproval
☐Change ☒NoChange/NotApplicable
Section4:Displayofcandidateperformancedata
TestScores–UnitDescriptiveStatistics
Test N Minimum Maximum Mean Std.Deviation
Art(08/10‐Present) TotalScaledScore 2 262.0 287.0 274.5 17.7
ValidN(listwise) 2
Biology(08/10‐Present) TotalScaledScore 1 225.0 225.0 225.0 0.0
ValidN(listwise) 1
CivilRights(008)(04/09‐Present)
TotalScaledScore 38 265.0 297.0 281.0 8.3
ValidN(listwise) 38
ElemEdI(08/10‐Present) TotalScaledScore 26 202.0 278.0 241.0 20.2
ValidN(listwise) 26
ElemEdII(08/10‐09/16) TotalScaledScore 24 201.0 277.0 240.1 21.3
ValidN(listwise) 24
EngOthLang(08/10‐Present) TotalScaledScore 14 218.0 277.0 256.6 15.2
ValidN(listwise) 14
English(08/10‐Present) TotalScaledScore 1 268.0 268.0 268.0 0.0
ValidN(listwise) 1
GeneralScience(09/11‐Present)
TotalScaledScore 6 193.0 241.0 216.0 19.1
ValidN(listwise) 6
Health(08/10‐Present) TotalScaledScore 3 243.0 262.0 254.3 10.0
ValidN(listwise) 3
P a g e 14 | 87
Mathematics(08/10‐09/16) TotalScaledScore 1 248.0 248.0 248.0 0.0
ValidN(listwise) 1
MGELA(08/10‐Present) TotalScaledScore 3 252.0 272.0 264.0 10.6
ValidN(listwise) 3
MGMath(08/10‐09/16) TotalScaledScore 9 200.0 249.0 225.2 17.8
ValidN(listwise) 9
MGSocSci(08/10‐Present) TotalScaledScore 1 230.0 230.0 230.0 0.0
ValidN(listwise) 1
PhysEd(08/10‐Present) TotalScaledScore 1 260.0 260.0 260.0 0.0
ValidN(listwise) 1
Physics(08/10‐Present) TotalScaledScore 1 271.0 271.0 271.0 0.0
ValidN(listwise) 1
SocScience(08/10‐Present) TotalScaledScore 10 218.0 253.0 237.9 11.1
ValidN(listwise) 10
SpecEd(08/10‐Present) TotalScaledScore 11 202.0 262.0 246.0 18.1
ValidN(listwise) 11
TestScores–byProgramDescriptiveStatistics
Program Test N Minimum Maximum Mean Std.Deviation
ValidN(listwise) 2
Biology(08/10‐Present)
TotalScaledScore 1 225.0 225.0 225.0 0.0
ValidN(listwise) 1
CivilRights(008)(04/09‐Present)
TotalScaledScore 25 265.0 297.0 282.2 8.6
ValidN(listwise) 25
P a g e 15 | 87
ValidN(listwise) 14
ElemEdII(08/10‐09/16)
TotalScaledScore 14 201.0 277.0 239.8 24.6
ValidN(listwise) 14
EngOthLang(08/10‐Present)
TotalScaledScore 13 218.0 277.0 256.5 15.8
ValidN(listwise) 13
English(08/10‐Present)
TotalScaledScore 1 268.0 268.0 268.0 0.0
ValidN(listwise) 1
GeneralScience(09/11‐Present)
TotalScaledScore 6 193.0 241.0 216.0 19.1
ValidN(listwise) 6
Health(08/10‐Present)
TotalScaledScore 3 243.0 262.0 254.3 10.0
ValidN(listwise) 3
Mathematics(08/10‐09/16)
TotalScaledScore 1 248.0 248.0 248.0 0.0
ValidN(listwise) 1
MGELA(08/10‐Present)
TotalScaledScore 3 252.0 272.0 264.0 10.6
ValidN(listwise) 3
MGMath(08/10‐09/16)
TotalScaledScore 8 200.0 249.0 228.1 16.6
ValidN(listwise) 8
MGSocSci(08/10‐Present)
TotalScaledScore 1 230.0 230.0 230.0 0.0
ValidN(listwise) 1
PhysEd(08/10‐Present)
TotalScaledScore 1 260.0 260.0 260.0 0.0
ValidN(listwise) 1
Physics(08/10‐Present)
TotalScaledScore 1 271.0 271.0 271.0 0.0
ValidN(listwise) 1
P a g e 16 | 87
SocScience(08/10‐Present)
TotalScaledScore 10 218.0 253.0 237.9 11.1
ValidN(listwise) 10
SPED CivilRights(008)(04/09‐Present)
TotalScaledScore 5 270.0 290.0 279.0 9.1
ValidN(listwise) 5
ElemEdI(08/10‐Present)
TotalScaledScore 2 202.0 235.0 218.5 23.3
ValidN(listwise) 2
ElemEdII(08/10‐09/16)
TotalScaledScore 2 205.0 235.0 220.0 21.2
ValidN(listwise) 2
SpecEd(08/10‐Present)
TotalScaledScore 11 202.0 262.0 246.0 18.1
ValidN(listwise) 11
Undergrad CivilRights(008)(04/09‐Present)
TotalScaledScore 8 269.0 292.0 278.4 7.2
ValidN(listwise) 8
ElemEdI(08/10‐Present)
TotalScaledScore 10 220.0 260.0 238.5 13.2
ValidN(listwise) 10
ElemEdII(08/10‐09/16)
TotalScaledScore 8 228.0 262.0 245.8 12.1
ValidN(listwise) 8
EngOthLang(08/10‐Present)
TotalScaledScore 1 258.0 258.0 258.0 0.0
ValidN(listwise) 1
EugeneCampusTeacherInquiryProjectDescriptiveStatistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std.Deviation
EUG_TIP_CONTEXT_AVE 19 2.0 3.0 2.8 .37
EUG_TIP_PLANNING_AVE 19 2.0 3.0 2.8 .38
EUG_TIP_ASSESSMENT_AVE 19 2.0 3.0 2.8 .43
EUG_TIP_ANALYSIS_AVE 19 2.0 3.0 2.6 .47
P a g e 17 | 87
EUG_TIP_INTERPRETATION_AVE 19 2.0 3.0 2.5 .48
ValidN(listwise) 19
ForestGroveCampusTeacherInquiryProjectDescriptiveStatistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std.Deviation
TIP_CONTEXT_AVE 27 3.2 5.0 4.4 .50
TIP_PLANNING_AVE 27 3.2 5.0 4.3 .48
TIP_UNIT_SUMMARY_AVE 27 3.0 5.0 4.3 .54
TIP_FACILITATING_LEARNING_AVE 27 2.7 5.0 4.2 .61
TIP_ANALYSIS_OF_LEARNING 27 2.6 5.0 4.4 .57
TIP_SYNTHESIS_AVE 27 2.6 5.0 4.4 .66
ValidN(listwise) 27
EugeneCampusStudentTeacherSummaryEvaluation1DescriptiveStatistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std.Deviation
TSE1_S_LEARNER_DEVELOPMENT_AVE 38 3.0 6.0 4.4 .90
TSE1_M_LEARNER_DEVELOPMENT_AVE 33 3.0 6.0 4.6 .75
TSE1_S_LEARNING_DIFFERENCES_AVE 38 2.5 6.0 4.1 .85
TSE1_M_LEARNING_DIFFERENCES_AVE 33 2.5 6.0 4.3 .95
TSE1_S_LEARNING_ENVIRONMENTS_AVE 38 3.0 6.0 4.5 .80
TSE1_M_LEARNING_ENVIRONMENTS_AVE 33 2.8 6.0 4.6 .78
TSE1_S_CONTENT_KNOWLEDGE_AVE 38 2.6 6.0 4.4 .80
TSE1_M_CONTENT_KNOWLEDGE_AVE 33 3.0 6.0 4.4 .77
TSE1_S_APPLICATION_OF_CONTENT_AVE 37 2.3 6.0 4.2 .95
TSE1_M_APPLICATION_OF_CONTENT_AVE 34 2.6 6.0 4.3 .90
TSE1_S_ASSESSMENT_AVE 38 2.3 6.0 4.4 .81
P a g e 18 | 87
TSE1_M_ASSESSMENT_AVE 33 3.0 6.0 4.5 .77
TSE1_S_PLANNING_AVE 38 2.5 5.7 4.3 .79
TSE1_M_PLANNING_AVE 33 2.5 5.7 4.4 .82
TSE1_S_INSTRUCTIONAL_STRATEGIES_AVE 38 2.3 6.0 4.2 .87
TSE1_M_INSTRUCTIONAL_STRATEGIES_AVE 34 2.0 6.0 4.2 .94
TSE1_S_PROFESSIONAL_ETHICAL_PRACTICE_AVE 38 3.0 6.0 4.5 .86
TSE1_M_PROFESSIONAL_ETHICAL_PRACTICE_AVE 33 3.0 6.0 4.6 .86
TSE1_S_LEADERSHIP_COLLABORATION_AVE 38 3.0 6.0 4.4 .81
TSE1_M_LEADERSHIP_COLLABORATION_AVE 38 3.0 6.0 4.5 .83
ValidN(listwise) 32
EugeneandWoodburnCampusTeacherSummaryEvaluation2DescriptiveStatistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std.Deviation
TSE2_S_LEARNER_DEVELOPMENT_AVE 11 4.0 5.5 4.6 .51
TSE2_M_LEARNER_DEVELOPMENT_AVE 11 4.0 5.5 4.5 .52
TSE2_S_LEARNING_DIFFERENCES_AVE 11 3.5 5.0 4.2 .60
TSE2_M_LEARNING_DIFFERENCES_AVE 11 3.0 5.0 4.2 .64
TSE2_S_LEARNING_ENVIRONMENTS_AVE 11 3.8 5.6 4.6 .54
TSE2_M_LEARNING_ENVIRONMENTS_AVE 11 3.4 5.2 4.4 .59
TSE2_S_CONTENT_KNOWLEDGE_AVE 11 3.4 5.2 4.3 .50
TSE2_M_CONTENT_KNOWLEDGE_AVE 11 3.0 5.2 4.2 .63
TSE2_S_APPLICATION_OF_CONTENT_AVE 11 3.6 5.0 4.3 .50
TSE2_M_APPLICATION_OF_CONTENT_AVE 11 2.6 5.0 4.1 .63
TSE2_S_ASSESSMENT_AVE 11 3.3 6.0 4.4 .73
P a g e 19 | 87
TSE2_M_ASSESSMENT_AVE 11 2.6 6.0 4.3 .85
TSE2_S_PLANNING_AVE 11 3.7 5.0 4.4 .46
TSE2_M_PLANNING_AVE 11 3.2 5.0 4.2 .51
TSE2_S_INSTRUCTIONAL_STRATEGIES_AVE 11 3.3 5.3 4.3 .62
TSE2_M_INSTRUCTIONAL_STRATEGIES_AVE 11 3.0 5.3 4.1 .67
TSE2_S_PROFESSIONAL_ETHICAL_PRACTICE_AVE 11 3.5 5.5 4.4 .53
TSE2_M_PROFESSIONAL_ETHICAL_PRACTICE_AVE 11 3.5 5.5 4.3 .63
TSE2_S_LEADERSHIP_COLLABORATION_AVE 11 3.5 5.5 4.5 .61
TSE2_M_LEADERSHIP_COLLABORATION_AVE 11 3.5 5.0 4.4 .72
ValidN(listwise) 11
ForestGroveCampusStudentTeacherSummaryEvaluation1DescriptiveStatistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std.Deviation
TSE1_S_LEARNER_DEVELOPMENT_AVE 43 3.0 6.0 4.4 1.0
TSE1_M_LEARNER_DEVELOPMENT_AVE 47 3.0 6.0 4.3 .97
TSE1_S_LEARNING_DIFFERENCES_AVE 45 3.0 6.0 4.5 .78
TSE1_M_LEARNING_DIFFERENCES_AVE 48 3.2 6.0 4.5 .79
TSE1_S_LEARNING_ENVIRONMENTS_AVE 44 3.2 6.0 4.6 .84
TSE1_M_LEARNING_ENVIRONMENTS_AVE 48 2.7 6.0 4.5 .87
TSE1_S_CONTENT_KNOWLEDGE_AVE 45 3.0 6.0 4.4 .81
TSE1_M_CONTENT_KNOWLEDGE_AVE 48 2.7 6.0 4.4 .86
TSE1_S_APPLICATION_OF_CONTENT_AVE 45 3.0 5.9 4.4 .82
TSE1_M_APPLICATION_OF_CONTENT_AVE 48 2.8 6.0 4.4 .87
TSE1_S_ASSESSMENT_AVE 43 3.0 6.0 4.3 .79
TSE1_M_ASSESSMENT_AVE 47 2.8 6.0 4.4 .86
TSE1_S_PLANNING_AVE 45 3.0 6.0 4.4 .76
P a g e 20 | 87
TSE1_M_PLANNING_AVE 48 2.7 6.0 4.4 .85
TSE1_S_INSTRUCTIONAL_STRATEGIES_AVE 45 3.0 6.0 4.4 .77
TSE1_M_INSTRUCTIONAL_STRATEGIES_AVE 48 3.0 6.0 4.4 .81
TSE1_S_PROFESSIONAL_ETHICAL_PRACTICE_AVE 43 3.2 6.0 4.9 .84
TSE1_M_PROFESSIONAL_ETHICAL_PRACTICE_AVE 47 2.8 6.0 5.0 .84
TSE1_S_LEADERSHIP_COLLABORATION_AVE 43 3.0 6.0 4.9 .83
TSE1_M_LEADERSHIP_COLLABORATION_AVE 47 2.6 6.0 4.8 .87
ValidN(listwise) 39
ForestGroveCampusStudentTeacherSummaryEvaluation2DescriptiveStatistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std.Deviation
TSE2_S_LEARNER_DEVELOPMENT_AVE 24 3.0 6.0 4.1 .74
TSE2_M_LEARNER_DEVELOPMENT_AVE 27 3.0 6.0 4.2 .91
TSE2_S_LEARNING_DIFFERENCES_AVE 27 3.5 5.5 4.4 .63
TSE2_M_LEARNING_DIFFERENCES_AVE 27 3.0 6.0 4.4 .78
TSE2_S_LEARNING_ENVIRONMENTS_AVE 27 3.1 6.0 4.4 .73
TSE2_M_LEARNING_ENVIRONMENTS_AVE 27 2.2 6.0 4.4 .91
TSE2_S_CONTENT_KNOWLEDGE_AVE 27 3.0 5.7 4.4 .69
TSE2_M_CONTENT_KNOWLEDGE_AVE 27 3.2 6.0 4.5 .74
TSE2_S_APPLICATION_OF_CONTENT_AVE 27 3.0 5.8 4.3 .77
TSE2_M_APPLICATION_OF_CONTENT_AVE 27 3.2 6.3 4.6 .77
TSE2_S_ASSESSMENT_AVE 27 3.0 6.0 4.3 .72
TSE2_M_ASSESSMENT_AVE 27 3.0 6.0 4.5 .82
TSE2_S_PLANNING_AVE 27 3.7 6.0 4.4 .57
TSE2_M_PLANNING_AVE 27 2.7 6.0 4.5 .79
TSE2_S_INSTRUCTIONAL_STRATEGIES_AVE 27 3.5 6.0 4.3 .57
P a g e 21 | 87
TSE2_M_INSTRUCTIONAL_STRATEGIES_AVE 27 2.5 6.0 4.5 .85
TSE2_S_PROFESSIONAL_ETHICAL_PRACTICE_AVE 27 4.0 6.0 5.0 .72
TSE2_M_PROFESSIONAL_ETHICAL_PRACTICE_AVE 27 3.8 6.0 5.2 .68
TSE2_S_LEADERSHIP_COLLABORATION_AVE 27 3.8 6.0 4.9 .70
TSE2_M_LEADERSHIP_COLLABORATION_AVE 27 3.1 6.0 5.0 .72
ValidN(listwise) 24
UndergraduateWorkSampleEvaluation1DescriptiveStatistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std.Deviation
WS1_LEARNER_DEVELOPMENT_AVE 3 4.0 5.0 4.6 .57
WS1_LEARNING_DIFFERENCES_AVE 3 5.0 5.0 5.0 .00
WS1_LEARNING_ENVIRONMENTS_AVE 3 4.0 5.0 4.6 .57
WS1_CONTENT_KNOWLEDGE_AVE 3 5.0 5.0 5.0 .00
WS1_APPLICATION_OF_CONTENT_AVE 3 4.0 5.0 4.3 .57
WS1_ASSESSMENT_AVE 3 4.3 5.0 4.6 .34
WS1_PLANNING_AVE 3 5.0 5.0 5.0 .00
WS1_INSTRUCTIONAL_STRATEGIES_AVE 3 4.8 5.0 4.9 .07
WS1_PROFESSIONAL_ETHICAL_PRACTICE_AVE 3 4.6 5.0 4.7 .19
WS1_LEADERSHIP_COLLABORATION_AVE 3 5.0 5.0 5.0 .00
ValidN(listwise) 3
UndergraduateWorkSampleEvaluation2DescriptiveStatistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std.Deviation
WS2_LEARNER_DEVELOPMENT_AVE 3 4.0 5.0 4.3 .57
WS2_LEARNING_DIFFERENCES_AVE 3 4.5 4.5 4.5 .00
WS2_LEARNING_ENVIRONMENTS_AVE 3 4.0 5.0 4.3 .57
P a g e 22 | 87
WS2_CONTENT_KNOWLEDGE_AVE 3 3.5 5.0 4.5 .86
WS2_APPLICATION_OF_CONTENT_AVE 3 3.0 5.0 4.3 1.1
WS2_ASSESSMENT_AVE 3 4.3 4.6 4.4 .19
WS2_PLANNING_AVE 3 5.0 5.0 5.0 .00
WS2_INSTRUCTIONAL_STRATEGIES_AVE 3 4.7 4.8 4.8 .07
WS2_PROFESSIONAL_ETHICAL_PRACTICE_AVE 3 4.3 5.0 4.6 .33
WS2_LEADERSHIP_COLLABORATION_AVE 3 4.0 5.0 4.6 .57
ValidN(listwise) 3
SpecialEducationTeacherInquiryProject1DescriptiveStatistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std.Deviation
HomePage 10 2 3 2.6 .51
SectionII‐A:Rationale 10 2 3 2.8 .42
SectionII‐BAlignmentofStandards&Objectives 10 2 3 2.7 .48
SectionII‐C:Assessment/DataCollectionPlan 10 2 3 2.7 .48
SectionII‐D:CriticalQuestion 0
SectionII‐E:UnitSequence/Calendar 10 2 3 2.8 .42
SectionIII‐A:KeyPoints 10 3 3 3.0 .00
SectionIII‐B:ContentRelationships 10 2 3 2.8 .42
SectionIII‐C:IndividualDifference/CulturalCompetence
10 2 3 2.7 .48
SectionIII‐D:Cross‐CurricularIntegration 10 2 3 2.6 .51
SectionIII‐E:ApplicationsofTechnology&Multimedia
10 2 3 2.7 .48
SectionIV:FacilitatingLearning/LessonPlans 10 2 3 2.9 .31
SectionV:AnalysisofLearning 10 2 3 2.7 .48
Resources 10 2 3 2.7 .48
P a g e 23 | 87
OverallPresentationofInstructionalUnit 9 2 3 2.8 .33
ValidN(listwise) 0
SpecialEducationTeacherInquiryProject2DescriptiveStatistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std.Deviation
HomePage 6 2 3 2.6 .51
A.Context&Rationale 6 2 3 2.6 .51
B.&C.ContentStandards&LearningGoals 6 2 3 2.6 .51
D.KeyPoints 6 1 3 2.6 .81
E.ContentRelationships 6 2 3 2.8 .40
F.Assessment/DataCollectionPlan 5 2 3 2.6 .54
G.UnitSequencew/Assessment&LessonCalendar 6 3 3 3.0 .00
H.LessonPlans 6 2 3 2.8 .40
I.&J.AccommodatingIndividualDifference 6 2 3 2.8 .40
K.Cross‐CurricularIntegration 6 1 3 2.5 .83
L.ApplicationofTechnology&Multimedia 6 2 3 2.8 .40
M.Communication 6 2 3 2.6 .51
N.O.&P.AnalysisofData&SummativeInterpretation
6 2 3 2.6 .51
Q.OverallReflectionofYourTeaching 6 3 3 3.0 .00
R.Resources 6 2 3 2.6 .51
S.OverallPresentationofSite 6 2 3 2.6 .51
ValidN(listwise) 5
P a g e 24 | 87
SpecialEducationUndergraduateWorkSample1DescriptiveStatistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std.Deviation
HomePage 3 2 2 2.0 .00
A.Context&Rationale 3 2 2 2.0 .00
B.&C.ContentStandards&LearningGoals 3 2 2 2.0 .00
D.KeyPoints 3 2 3 2.3 .57
E.ContentRelationships 3 2 2 2.0 .00
F.Assessment/DataCollectionPlan 3 2 3 2.3 .57
G.UnitSequencew/Assessment&LessonCalendar 3 2 2 2.0 .00
H.LessonPlans 3 2 3 2.3 .57
I.&J.AccommodatingIndividualDifference 3 2 2 2.0 .00
K.Cross‐CurricularIntegration 3 2 2 2.0 .00
L.ApplicationofTechnology&Multimedia 3 2 2 2.0 .00
M.Communication 3 2 3 2.3 .57
N.O.&P.AnalysisofData&SummativeInterpretation
3 2 3 2.6 .57
Q.OverallReflectionofYourTeaching 3 2 3 2.6 .57
R.Resources 3 2 2 2.0 .00
S.OverallPresentationofSite 3 2 3 2.3 .57
ValidN(listwise) 3
SpecialEducationUndergraduateWorkSample2DescriptiveStatistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std.Deviation
HomePage 3 2 2 2.0 .00
A.Context&Rationale 3 1 2 1.6 .57
B.&C.ContentStandards&LearningGoals 3 2 3 2.3 .57
P a g e 25 | 87
D.KeyPoints 3 1 2 1.6 .57
E.ContentRelationships 3 2 3 2.3 .57
F.Assessment/DataCollectionPlan 3 2 3 2.3 .57
G.UnitSequencew/Assessment&LessonCalendar
3 2 3 2.3 .57
H.LessonPlans 3 1 3 2.0 1.0
I.&J.AccommodatingIndividualDifference 3 2 2 2.0 .00
K.Cross‐CurricularIntegration 3 2 3 2.3 .57
L.ApplicationofTechnology&Multimedia 3 2 2 2.0 .00
M.Communication 3 2 3 2.3 .57
N.O.&P.AnalysisofData&SummativeInterpretation
3 1 3 2.3 1.1
Q.OverallReflectionofYourTeaching 3 2 3 2.3 .57
R.Resources 3 2 2 2.0 .00
S.OverallPresentationofSite 3 1 2 1.6 .57
ValidN(listwise) 3
edTPAScorebyUnitDescriptiveStatistics
Test N Minimum Maximum Mean Std.Deviation
ElementaryEducation(01/13‐Present)
TotalTestScore 7 36 58 42.7 7.9
ValidN(listwise) 7
SecondaryELA(03/12‐Present)
TotalTestScore 3 28 47 37.0 9.5
ValidN(listwise) 3
SecondaryHSS(03/12‐Present)
TotalTestScore 2 44 50 47.0 4.2
ValidN(listwise) 2
TotalTestScore 4 33 41 36.7 3.3
P a g e 26 | 87
SecondaryMath(03/12‐Present)
ValidN(listwise)4
SecondaryScience(03/12‐Present)
TotalTestScore 8 35 53 48.0 5.5
ValidN(listwise) 8
SpecialEducation(03/12‐Present)
TotalTestScore 3 27 48 34.0 12.1
ValidN(listwise) 3
edTPAScores–byProgramDescriptiveStatistics
Program Test N Minimum Maximum Mean Std.Deviation
MAT ElementaryEducation(01/13‐Present)
TotalTestScore 2 42 58 50.0 11.3
ValidN(listwise) 2
SecondaryELA(03/12‐Present)
TotalTestScore 3 28 47 37.0 9.5
ValidN(listwise) 3
SecondaryHSS(03/12‐Present)
TotalTestScore 2 44 50 47.0 4.2
ValidN(listwise) 2
SecondaryMath(03/12‐Present)
TotalTestScore 4 33 41 36.7 3.3
ValidN(listwise) 4
SecondaryScience(03/12‐Present)
TotalTestScore 8 35 53 48.0 5.5
ValidN(listwise) 8
SPED SpecialEducation(03/12‐Present)
TotalTestScore 3 27 48 34.0 12.1
ValidN(listwise) 3
Undergrad ElementaryEducation(01/13‐Present)
TotalTestScore 5 36 48 39.8 5.0
ValidN(listwise) 5
Section5:Notrequiredfor2015‐16AcademicYear
P a g e 27 | 87
Section6:AreasforImprovement,Weaknesses,and/orStipulationsSummarizeEPPactivitiesandtheoutcomesofthoseactivitiesastheyrelatetocorrectingtheareascitedinthelastAccreditationAction/DecisionReport. AreasforImprovementrelatedtoStandard1citedasaresultofthelastNCATEreview:
1. Theunithasnotclearlyidentifiedorconsistentlyassessedthedispositionsasoutlinedintheconceptualframework.(ITP)(ADV)RESPONSE:Fortheacademicyear2015‐2016,wehaveimplementedredesignedstudentteachingmid‐placementandsummaryevaluations,includingdatapointsalignedwithInTASCCriticalDispositions.Foreachfieldexperienceandpracticuminwhichourstudentsparticipate,theirmentorteacher/universitysupervisorwillcompleteaprofessionaldispositionsrubricatboththemidpointandendofthatexperience,thusprovidingachanceforformativeaswellassummativefeedback.Thesamedispositionformcanbecompletedduringanyfieldexperience/practicumand/orcourseasawayofdocumentingprogressandareasforstudentgrowth.Drawingonarangeofindicatorsaswellasmultipleperspectivesandkeycheckpointsintheprogram,candidatedispositionsarecontinuallybenchmarkedagainsttheconceptualframeworkoftheunitaswellasthelicensureframeworksetoutbytheState.Documentingsuchdataandusingthistoinformplanningandtoassesscompetencywillcontinuetoplayaroleinongoingprogramdevelopment.
AreasforImprovementrelatedtoStandard4citedasaresultofthelastNCATEreview:1. Candidateshavelimitedopportunitiestointeractwithfacultymembersfromdiverse
backgrounds.(ITP)(ADV)RESPONSE:Werecruitthoseofdiversebackgroundsandinallhiresseektodiversifyourfaculty,supervisors,staffandmentorteachers.Withtherecenteconomicdownturnandsubsequentdropinenrollment,wehavehadlimitedopportunitiestohirenewfull‐timefaculty.Inthelasttwoyears,wehavehiredonenewfull‐timefacultymember,andthatfacultymemberisapersonofcolor.Currently,33%ofourfulltimefacultyarefacultyofcolor.Twentypercentofouradjunctfacultyarefacultyofcolor.Approximately20%ofourmentorteachersareofcoloraswell.Wecontinuetoworkonunderstandingthediversityofourmentorteachers.Ournextstepistodevelopthecooperatingteacherintakeform.Thisformwillcollectself‐reportedethnicandculturalbackgroundinformation,yearsofteachingexperience,disciplineexpertise,andotherlogisticalinformationfromourcooperatingteachers.ThisstepalignswithourP12partners’goalsofincreasingthediversitywithintheirteachingstaffas
P a g e 28 | 87
well.WearealsoexpandingourpartnershipworktoinvolveP12schoolswithmorediverseteacherpopulations.Finally,ourB.Ed.programinWoodburnfocusesonincreasingthenumberofunderrepresentedteachersinOregonpublicschools(specificallyLatino/Latina).Thiscommitmenttodiversityguidesourhiringaswellasourprogramming.
Section7:AccreditationPathwaySelectedImprovement:SummarizeprogressontheSelectedImprovementplanforthestandard(s)orcomponent(s)selected.RESPONSE:PacificSchoolofLearningandTeaching(SLT)strivestomakecontinuousimprovementinallareasofteacherpreparationpracticeinordertoadvancetowardTargetlevelperformanceonallstandards(e.g.,seeSection6responsestospecificStandard1and4AFIs).WhiletheunithasexhibitedperformanceatoraboveAcceptablelevelonallelementsofStandard3,wecontinuetomakesignificantprogressinregardtoElement3a.;thisresponseisinreferencetoStandard3Element(a):CollaborationBetweenUnitandSchoolPartners.Movingforward,weareconsciousthatthisstandardwithinCAEPresidesinStandard2:ClinicalPartnershipandPractice.Case1‐‐ForestGroveSchoolDistrict:ThispastyearhasbeenoneofdevelopmentalongsideForestGroveSchoolDistrict(FGSD).IncollaborationwithSLTleadershipandstaff,FGSDhasinvolvedtheworkoftheForestGroveSLTintotheirplanninganddevelopmentcycles.Thishasallowedgreatercross‐fertilizationofideas,practicesandgoals.OneexampleofthisisanoverhaulofthewaytheSLTplansandimplementstudentteachingplacements,ensuringthattheprocessismoretimely,andinkeepingwithrealworldneedsandtimelinesofdistricts.ThismodelhasprovedsosuccessfulthatithasbeenrolledouttoincludeallForestGroveSLTpartnerdistricts/schools.Case2‐‐KennedyElementarySchool:During2015‐16,PacificSLT(WoodburnCampus)initiatedanewclinicalteacherpreparationsitefortheB.Ed.inTeachingandEnglishLanguageLearning,embeddedinTitleISalem‐KeizerSchoolDistrict(SKSD).During2015‐16,meetingswereheldwithKennedyElementarySchool(KES)administratorsandteacherstoco‐designandimplementB.Ed.courseworkandclinicalpractice.TheinitialcohortofPacificB.Ed.studentswillbeginclinicalworkatKennedyinfall2016.Case3‐‐DosRios‐TwoRiversElementarySchool:TheSchoolofLearningandTeaching(EugeneCampus)continuestodevelopitsProfessionalDevelopmentSchoolwithDosRios‐TwoRiversElementarySchool(DRES)intheSpringfieldSchoolDistrict.Inthispartnershipgroupsofteachercandidatesareplacedforclinicalpractica,andtwosupervisorsworkwiththecandidatestoestablishdeepandmeaningfulconnectionswiththeschoolstaffandcommunity.Notably,DRES
P a g e 29 | 87
teachersco‐teachuniversityclasseswithourprofessors,anduniversityprofessorslead“learningwalks”asapartoftheschoolprofessionaldevelopmentactivities.In2015‐16,theprincipalandaPacificfacultymemberattendedthenationalprofessionaldevelopmentschoolconference.Atthisconference,theprincipalandfacultymemberworkedtorefinethevisionandmissionofthepartnershipaswellasidentifiedstrategicgoalsmovingforward.OneofthosegoalsistoensurethatthePDSisapartofregularsteeringcommitteemeetingsfortheschoolandrecognizedwithintheuniversitystrategicplan.SLTanticipatesthattheunitwillperformatTargetlevelinStandardElement3ebythetimeofthenextreview.
P a g e 30 | 87
APPENDICESEugeneTeacherInquiryProjectRubric
PerformancePrompts
0=NoEvidence 1=NotMet 2=Met 3=Exceeds
1.Context(Introduction)
1.Analysisofcommunity,district,school,classroomlevelvariablesthatmayaffectteachingandlearning.
Noevidenceofanalysisofcontextualvariablesthatmayaffectlearning.
Candidateincludessuperficialcontextualvariableswithoutanalysisofhowtheyinfluenceteachingandlearning.
Candidateincludesdescriptionsofthedistrictandclassroomfocusingtheanalysisonpossiblelimitationstotheteachingandlearningprocess.
Candidateprovidesdescriptivenarrationofthecommunity,district,schoolandclassroomandanalyzeshoweachinfluencesplanning,teachingandlearningandincludesplanstomakeuseofcontextualfactorsinincreasestudentachievement.
2.Descriptionandanalysisofindividuallearnersanddifferencesincludingrace/ethnicity,culture,language,personalinterests,academicprogress,andleveloffamilyinvolvement.
Candidateworkcontainslittleornoevidenceofindividuallearnercharacteristics.
Candidatedescribeslearnersclinicallyrelyingonlyuponscores/Psychometricdata.
Candidatedescribesindividuallearnersincludingbothsociologicalfactorsandacademicinformation.
Candidatedescribesindividuallearnersincludingsociologicalfactors,andacademicinformationandanalyzeshoweachaffectsthelearningprocess.
3.Analysisofindividualstudentpriorknowledgebasedonpre‐assessmentdata
Noevidencethatcandidatehasanalyzedpriorknowledgeneededfor
Candidatehasanalyzedpriorknowledgeneededforacademic
Candidatehasanalyzedpriorknowledgeneededforacademic
Candidatehasanalyzedpriorknowledgeneededforacademic
P a g e 31 | 87
gatheredinrelationtotargetsforlearning.
academicsuccess.
successbuthasnotincludedcontextualfactorsorassessmentdata.
successincludingcontextualfactorsorassessmentdatafortheclassingeneralwithoutattentiontosubgroups.
successincludingcontextualfactorsorassessmentdataforallstudentswithspecificplansforthoseinsubgroups.
PerformancePrompts
0=NoEvidence 1=NotMet 2=Met 3=Exceeds
2. PlanningandDeliveryofInstruction(Methods)
1.Targetsforlearningarealignedtoappropriatestandards.
Noevidenceofalignmentwithstandards.
Minimalevidenceofalignmentwithstandards.
Standardsarenotedandlooselyconnectedwithcontentofunit.
Standardsarenotedandclearlyconnectedandalignedwithcontentofunit.
2.Appropriatecontentstandardsareusedtoguideplanning.
Noevidencetheuseofstandardsguidetheplanning,teachingandlearningprocess.
Minimalevidenceofunderstandinganduseofstandards‐basedinstruction.
Standardsarenotedandlooselyconnectedwithcontentofunitandthelearningtargets.
Standardsarenotedandclearlyconnectedwithcontentofunitandthelearningtargetsleadtoacademicprogress.
3.ContextandLearnerinformationinformsthedevelopmentofunitgoalsandcontent.
Candidatedoesnotconsidercontextinchoosingunitcontent.
Candidateconsiderstextsandreadilyavailableresourceswhenmakingunitcontentdecisions.
Candidateconsidersavailableresources,districtandschoolgoalswhenmakingdecisionsaboutgoalsandcontent.
Candidateusesclassroomresources,knowledgeofcommunityandlearnerneeds,andCCSStodecideonunitgoalsandcontentdecisions.
4.Cleartargetsforlearningarealignedwith
Candidatehasnotincludedlearningtargetsfortheunit.
Learningtargetsaremisalignedwithunitgoals
Learningtargetsarealignedtounitgoalsandcontent
Learningtargetsarealignedtounitgoalsand
P a g e 32 | 87
studentpriorknowledge.
andcontentstandardsorhavenoconnectiontothestudents’priorclassroomexperiences.
standards,andconnecttopriorlearningandexperiences.
contentstandards,connecttopriorlearningandexperiences,andarewritteninlanguageaccessibleforstudents.
5.Targetsforlearningrepresentavarietyofkindandcomplexity.
Therearenolearningtargets.
Targetsfocusexclusivelyononetypeofgoal(e.g.,conceptattainmentorapplication),orarepoorlywrittenandunclear.
Targetcontainsgoalsthataddressbothconceptattainmentandapplicationofknowledgeandskills,buttargetslacksomeclarity.
Targetcontainswell‐writtenandappropriatelybalancedgoalsforbothconceptattainmentandapplicationofknowledgeandskills.
6.Unitcontent,instructionalmethods,andlearningactivitiesdevelopacademiclanguage.
Noevidenceofacademiclanguagedevelopment.
Minimalevidenceofattentiontoappropriateacademiclanguageintheunitdevelopment.
Academiclanguagedevelopmentappearsintheunitcontent,andindividuallessonplans.
Academiclanguagedevelopmentappearsintheunitcontent,individuallessonplans,andstudentactivitieswithevidenceofassessment.
7.Instructionalstrategiesarealignedwiththeneedsofthelearnerandincludeappropriatedifferentiation.
Instructionalstrategiesarenotalignedwiththeneedsofthelearnerandnodifferentiationispresent.
Instructionalstrategiesareemergingandlooselyalignedwiththeneedsofthelearnerwithemergingdifferentiationinpresentation.
Instructionalstrategiesarelimitedwithintheunitbutareappropriateforthelearningtargetsanddiscipline,andaligntothedevelopmentallevelofthelearners.
Instructionalstrategiesarevariedwithintheunitandlessonsandareappropriateforthelearningtargetsanddiscipline,andaligntothedevelopmental
P a g e 33 | 87
levelofthelearners.
8.Multipleinstructionalstrategiesalignwithlearningtargets,thediscipline,andarecompatibletodevelopmentallevelofthelearner.
Instructionalstrategiesareinappropriateforthelearningtargets,discipline,anddevelopmentallevelofthelearners.
Instructionalstrategiesareinappropriateforthelearningtargets,ordiscipline,butaligntothedevelopmentallevelofthelearners.
Instructionalstrategiesarelimitedwithintheunitbutareappropriateforthelearningtargetsanddiscipline,andaligntothedevelopmentallevelofthelearners.
Instructionalstrategiesarevariedwithintheunitandlessonsandareappropriateforthelearningtargetsanddiscipline,andaligntothedevelopmentallevelofthelearners.
9.Technologyisusedtoenhancelearningasappropriate.
Noevidenceoftechnologyintegrationoruseoftechnology.
Evidenceofminimaluseoftechnology,butnoclearconnectiontolearningenhancement.
Evidenceoftechnologyusethatenhancesthelearning.
Clearevidencethatuseoftechnologythatstrengthenslessondelivery,enhancesthelearningofallstudentsandsupportslearningtargets.
10.Formativeassessmentsupportsstudentprogresstowardstandardsandlessonlearningtargets.
Noformativeassessmentused.
Formativeassessmentlimitedtoquizzesandprovidenoqualitativefeedbacktolearners.
Formativeassessmentusedregularlybutlimitedtostrategiesthatprovideinformationonlytoteacher.
Formativeassessmentusedregularlyandincludemultipleopportunitiesforlearnerstogetspecificinformationtoprogresstowardtarget.
11.Asappropriate,collaboratewithfamily,otherprofessionals,andparaprofessionals(collaboration
Noevidenceofcollaboration.
Evidenceofminimalcollaborationwithotherprofessionalsorspecialists,butwithno
Evidenceofcollaborationwithfamilyandotherbuildingpersonnel,withsomeexplanation
Evidenceofeffectivecollaborationwithfamilyandotherbuildingpersonnel,withclear
P a g e 34 | 87
aroundplanningandimplementation).
explanationabouthowsuchworkaffectsteachingandlearning.
abouthowsuchworkaffectsteachingandlearning.
explanationabouthowsuchworkaffectsteachingandlearning.
PerformancePrompts
0=NoEvidence 1=NotMet 2=Met 3=Exceeds
3.Assessment(Methods)
Triangulatedassessmentplanalignswithstatedlearningtargets,goals,andobjectives.1.Postassessmentsaretightlyalignedwithpre‐assessmentdatainordertodeterminestudentlearninggains.
Chosenassessmentsarenotalignedanddataarenotreliable.
Thepre‐assessmentandpost‐assessmentareonlymarginallyalignedandtherearelargedifferencesmakingcomparisonsbetweenthetwoassessmentsverydifficult
Thepre‐assessmentandpost‐assessmentaremostlyalignedthoughtherearesomedissimilaritiesthatmakecomparisonsdifficult.
Thepost‐testisobviouslyalignedtothepre‐testandanydifferencesareobviouslyparallelmakingcomparisonsbetweenthemaccurateandapparent,allowinggainstobecomputed.
Triangulatedassessmentplanistightlyalignedinordertodeterminestudentlearninggains.2.Assessmentitemsareclearandfreefromambiguityandbias.
Noassessmentitemsareprovidedforanalysis.
Therearemanyassessmentitemsthatareunclear,incomplete,ambiguousandpotentiallybiased.
Almostallassessmentitemsareclear,complete,andfreefromambiguityandbias.
Allassessmentitemsareclear,complete,andfreefromambiguityandbias.
Assessmentplansprovidemultipleperspectivesonstudentlearning,isclearandfreefromambiguity,andprovidesaholisticpictureofwhatstudentshaveorhavenotlearned.3.Assessmentsareappropriatelydifferentiatedtomeettheneedsofthelearner.
Noevidenceofdifferentiationofassessmentsisprovided.
Assessmentsaredifferentiatedbylimitingcontentandloweringcontentstandards.
Assessmentsaredifferentiatedbytheallowanceofadditionaltimeonlyandisprovidedonlyforlearnersindesignatedsubgroups.
Assessmentsaredifferentiatedincontentand/ordeliveryasappropriateforgroupsorindividualstudents.
P a g e 35 | 87
4.Assessmentcontentisvalid.
Noevidencethattheassessmentcoversthefullextentofthecontentoftheworksample.
Assessmentcoversthecontentoftheworksamplebutunevenlyandinappropriatelyforthecontentemphasizedintheworksample.
Assessmentcoversthefullcontentoftheworksampleevenly,butquestionsarenotalwaysreflectiveofthecontentemphasized.
Assessmentcoversthecontentoftheworksampleevenly,andquestionsarereflectiveofwhatwasemphasized,butassessmentisunlikelytocapturethefullrangeofpossibleresponses.
PerformancePrompts
0=NoEvidence 1=NotMet 2=Met 3=Exceeds
4.AnalysisofdataonLearningGains(Results)
1.Wholeclassanalysisofdatareflectinglearninggainsacrosstriangulatedassessmentdataforeachidentifiedlearningoutcome.
Noanalysisofdata.
Analysisofdataisfaultyorincomplete.
Dataanalysiscontainsaccuratedataandnarrativeexplanationofresults.
Dataanalysiscontainsaccuratequantitativeexplainingthosedataalongwithpossiblereasonsforthoseresults.
2.Subgroupassessmentdataprovidedandanalyzedtoevaluateachievement.
Thereisnosubgrouplearninganalysis.
Subgroupanalysisisnotaccurateorreflectiveofassessments.
Subgroupanalysisisaccurateandincludespreandpost‐assessmentsrepresentingalllearningoutcomes.
Subgroupanalysisisquantitativelyaccurateandincludesqualitativeexplanationofresultsalongwithrationaleoflearning.
3.Analysisofindividualstudentdatareflectinglearninggainsacrosstriangulatedassessmentdata
Thereisnoanalysisoflearninggainsforeachstudent.
Analysisoflearninggainsislimitedtoquantitativedataonfinalassessment.
Analysisofindividuallearninggainsforeachstudentcontainsdataonbothassessmentsfor
Analysisofindividuallearninggainsisaccurate,andprovidedforeachstudentforalllearning
P a g e 36 | 87
foreachidentifiedlearningoutcome.
alllearninggoals.
goalsusingpre‐andpost‐assessments.Narrativeexplanationsofdatacontainrationaleforresults.
PerformancePrompts
0=NoEvidence 1=NotMet 2=Met 3=Exceeds
5.Interpretationandreflection(Discussion)
1.Interpretationandreflectionofwholegrouplearning.
Noevidenceofreflectiononassessmentofstudentlearning.
Minimalevidenceofreflectiononwholeclassandlearningisincluded.
Analysisofwholeclasslearninggainsisclear,includesanalysisofsub‐groups,andnarrativetoexplainanygainsandanydiscrepanciesbetweenwholeclassandidentifiedsub‐group(s)learninggains.
Highqualityevidenceofstudentlearningisincluded,anddemonstratesknowledgeofstudentgainsforwholeclassandidentifiedsub‐group(s),andreflectsondiscrepanciesandcriticallyconsiderswaystoaddressthegapinsubsequentinstruction.
2.Interpretationandreflectionofsubgrouplearning.
No evidenceofreflectionoranalysis.
Minimalevidenceofreflectionandanalysisofsubgrouplearningisincluded.
Analysisofindividuallearninggainsisclear,includesanalysisofdata,andnarrativetoexplaingainsandanyinconsistenciesinsubgroupperformance.
Highqualityevidenceofstudentlearningisincluded,andnarrativedemonstratesknowledgeofsubgroupgainsandcriticallyconsiderswaystoaddresseffectivesubsequentinstruction.
P a g e 37 | 87
3.Interpretationandreflectionofindividualstudentlearning.
Noevidenceofreflectionoranalysis.
Minimalevidenceofreflectionandanalysisofindividuallearningisincluded.
Analysisofindividuallearninggainsisclear,includesanalysisofdata,andnarrativetoexplaingainsandanyinconsistenciesinlearnerperformance.
Highqualityevidenceofstudentlearningisincluded,andnarrativedemonstratesknowledgeofindividualstudentgainsandcriticallyconsiderswaystoaddresseffectivesubsequentinstruction.
4.Communicatelearninggainstostudentandfamily.
Noevidenceofcommunicationtostudentorfamily.
Communicationwithstudentsand/orfamiliesisminimalandbroad,inaddressingtheentireclass.
Communicationwithstudentsandfamiliesisclear,andprovidesinformationthatwillallowstudentsandfamiliestoacknowledgegrowthandareasforattention.
Communicationwithstudentsandfamiliesisclear,anddemonstratesadesiretopartnerwiththestudentandfamilytopromotelearninggains,andincludesindividualstudentneeds.
5.Reflectionoftheunitrelativetolearninggoalsfor:wholeclass,individualstudent,andsub‐group(s)
Noevidenceofreflectionontheunit.
Reflectionontheunitisincluded,butdoesnotcriticallyconsiderthelearninggains.
Reflectionontheunitisincludedaswellasadiscussionoflearninggains,butlacksdepth,orusesbroadstatements.
Thoroughreflectionontheunitincludesdiscussionofthelearninggainsofalllearners,anddemonstratesknowledgeofculturalandacademicdiversity.
P a g e 38 | 87
6.Reflectiononself,consideringfutureprofessionaldevelopment.
Noevidenceofself‐assessmentoridentificationofareasforgrowth.
Writingreflectsminimalself‐reflectionandfocusesonstudentissues.
Writingreflectsawarenessofstrengthsandweaknesseswithconsiderationoffutureprofessionaldevelopment.
Highqualitynarrativethatdemonstratesdeepself‐reflectionthatacknowledgesstrengthsshownintheunitandidentifiesspecificareasforgrowth.Includesclearstrategies.
ForestGroveTeacherInquiryProjectRubric
Context(Introduction) 1pt 3pts 5pts1A.Introduction:TIPintroductioninwhichthereisaframingandsummarydescriptionoftheTIP.Includescriticalquestion,context,andthoroughdescriptionoftheunitofstudyelaboratingonthereasoningunderlyingitsdevelopmentandthemethodsyouwillemploy(1.000,25%)
FramingandsummaryoftheTIPisunclear.Criticalquestion,context,anddescriptionoftheunitofstudyarepresentbutinadequate.
FramingandsummaryoftheTIPisadequate.Includescriticalquestion,context,anddescriptionoftheunitofstudy.
FramingandsummaryoftheTIPiscomprehensive.Includescriticalquestion,context,andthoroughdescriptionoftheunitofstudyelaboratingonthereasoningunderlyingitsdevelopmentandthepedagogicalmethodsyouwillemploy.
1B.Context:Analysisofcommunity,district,school,classroomlevelvariablesthatmayaffectteachingandlearning.(1.000,25%)
Candidateincludessuperficialcontextualvariableswithoutanalysisofhowtheyinfluenceteachingandlearning.
Candidateincludesdescriptionsofthedistrictandclassroomfocusingtheanalysisonpossiblelimitationstotheteachingandlearningprocess.
Candidateprovidesdescriptivenarrationofthecommunity,district,school,andclassroomandanalyzeshoweachinfluencesplanning,teaching,andlearningandincludesplanstomakeuseofcontextualfactorsinincreasestudentachievement.
1C.Learners:Descriptionandanalysisofindividuallearnersanddifferencesincludingrace/ethnicity,culture,language,personal
Candidatedescribeslearnersclinicallyrelyinguponsuperficialorstandardizeddata.
Candidatedescribesindividuallearnersincludingpersonal,sociologicalfactors
Candidatedescribesindividuallearnersincludingpersonalandsociologicalfactors,andacademicinformationandanalyzeshoweachaffectsthelearningprocess.
P a g e 39 | 87
interests,academicprogress,andleveloffamilyinvolvement.(1.000,25%)
andacademicinformation.
1D.Self:Describeyourpreferredstylesoflearningandteachinghowwillyourcriticalquestioninformyourunderstandingofselfandcontributetoyourdevelopmentasalearnerandteacher.(1.000,25%)
Candidatedescribesselfandquestioninadetachedmanner.
Candidatedescribesselfandtheprocessofengaginginpursuitofcriticalquestioninauthenticandmeaningfulway.
Candidatethoughtfullydescribesselfandtheprocessoffindinganddevelopingtheircriticalquestioninanauthenticandmeaningfulway.
PlanningforLearning(FocusonUnit)2A.CriticalQuestion:Describescriticalquestionintermsofpersonalinterest,andprofessionalrelevance.Provideliteratureareviewandcitereferences.Operationalizationofconstructsisclearlyarticulated(1.000,14%)
Criticalquestionisincludedhoweveritisnotsituatedintermsofselforpreviousliterature.
Criticalquestioniscarefullydescribedintermsofself,andprofessionaldevelopment.Literaturereviewandreferencesareincluded.Constructsdefined.
Criticalquestioniscarefullydescribedintermsofpersonalinterest,andwhyitwillcontributetoyourprofessionaldevelopment.Thoroughliteraturereviewandreferencesareincluded.Constructsclearlydefined.
2B.LearningGoals:Developappropriatelearninggoalsthataddresscognitiveandaffectivedomainsandconnectwithoverarchingstandards.(1.000,14%)
Containsgoalstatementsthatdonotconveythepurposeoftheunit.Doesnotincludeagoalathighercognitivelevelwhenitwouldhavebeenappropriate.
Containsbroadstatementsthatconveythepurposeoftheunit.Goalsstatementswheredevelopmentallyappropriate.
Containsbroadstatementsthatconveythepurposeoftheunit.Goalstatementsincludehighercognitivelevelswheredevelopmentallyappropriate.
2C.ContentStandards:Appropriatecontentstandardsareusedtoguideplanning.
Minimalevidenceofunderstandinganduseofstandards‐basedinstruction.
Standardsarenotedandclearlyconnectedwithcontentofunitandthelearningtargets
Standardsarenotedandclearlyconnectedwithcontentofunitandthelearningtargetsleadtoacademicprogress.
P a g e 40 | 87
leadtoacademicprogress.
2D.TriangulatedPreandPostAssessments:Provideadescriptionofpreandpostinstructionassessments.Yourdescriptionshouldaddresstheassessmentoflearningforeachoftheunitgoalspriorto,aswellasafterinstruction.Assessmentsshouldbedesignedtoobtaindatafortheentireclassaswellasonatleastthreeindividuals(strong,proficient,andemerging).(1.000,14%)
Assessmentsdonotmeasurepriorcontentknowledgeand/orskillsandlearninggainsforunitgoals.Assessmentsarenotdesignedtoobtaininformationonwholeclassoratleastthreeindividualstudents.
Assessmentsmeasurepriorandcurrentcontentknowledgeand/orskillsandlearninggainsofstudentsformostunitlearninggoals.Indicateswheremostunitgoalsareaddressedinpre‐andpost‐instructionassessment.Assessmentsaredesignedtoobtaindataonwholeclassandin‐depthdataonatleastthreeindividuals(strong,proficient,andemerging).
Assessmentsvalidlyandappropriatelymeasurepriorandcurrentcontentknowledgeand/orthestudents’skillsforallunitlearninggoals.Assessmentsarerigorousandengaging,andaretiedtoarealisticcontext,whenpossible.Describeswhereunitgoalsareaddressed.Assessmentsareclearandbiasfree.Assessmentsaredesignedtoobtaindataoneachstudentandin‐depthdataonatleastthreeindividuals(strong,proficient,andemerging).Post‐instructionassessmentsvalidlymeasureeachstudent’slearninggains.
2E.TriangulatedKeyFormativeAssessments:Writeanarrativeexplainingthetypesofauthenticformativeassessmentsyouwillusethatwillinformyourinstructioninprocess.(1.000,14%)
Formativeassessmentslackauthenticity,anddonotprovideadequateevidenceofstudentlearning.
Formativeassessmentsareauthentic,andprovidemultipleperspectivesonstudentlearning.
Formativeassessmentsareauthentic,thorough,andcarefullydesigned,andprovidemultipleperspectivesonstudentlearning.
2F.AuthenticPerformanceTask:Createaperformancetaskinwhichstudentsapplytheirunderstandingofanappropriatelearninggoal(s)inanauthenticactivity.Thetaskshouldbevalid,addressrealistproblemsoraudiences,berigorousandhaveatleasttwowaysforstudentstodemonstratetheirunderstanding.(1.000,14%)
Taskisnotvalidand/ordisconnectedfromunitlearninggoals&standards.Taskaddressesunrealisticproblems,iseithernotengagingornotmeaningfultostudents.
Taskisvalidandsomewhatconnectedtounitlearninggoals&standards,addressesrealisticproblems,issomewhatgenerallyengagingandmeaningfultostudents.
Taskisvalidandwellconnectedtounitlearninggoalsandstandards,addressesrealisticproblems,isengagingandmeaningfultostudents,andcontainsatleasttwodifferentmethodsforstudentstodemonstratetheirunderstanding.
P a g e 41 | 87
2G.TriangulatedAssessmentplanforcriticalquestion:Describethetypesoftriangulateddatawillbecollectedthatwillallowyoutoanalyzeandreflectonyourcriticalquestion.(1.000,14%)
Interviews,artifacts,and/orobservationsarenotpresent.Inadequatedataonwhichtobaseassessmentsandreflections.
Interviews,artifacts,andobservationsprovideadatasetfromwhichassessmentsandreflectionsmaybemade.
Extensiveinterviews,artifacts,andobservationsprovideathickdatasetfromwhichassessmentsandreflectionsmaybemade.
UnitSummary(describingtheUnitasawhole)3A.KeyPoints:Bulletedlistofkeypoints,essentialconcepts,facts,skills,academiclanguageoritemsofinformation.(1.000,14%)
Listomitssomekeyconcepts,facts,skills,orinformation,indicatingamisunderstanding.
Listincludeskeyconcepts,facts,skills,academiclanguage,oritemsofinformation.
Listdisplaysacomprehensiveunderstandingofkeyconcepts,facts,skills,academiclanguage,oritemsofinformationcentraltothisunit.(15‐25suggested).
3B.ContentRelations:Theorganizationoftheunitshowinghowspecificlearningactivitiessupportlessonobjectives,andinturn,howtheseobjectivessupporttheunitlearninggoalsandthestandards.Thepurposeistodemonstratealinearconnectionfromgoalstolearningactivities.(1.000,14%)
Doesnotillustrateordescriberelationbetweenstandards,unitlearninggoals,learningobjectivesandactivities.
Illustratesorelucidateshowobjectivessupportunitlearninggoalsandstandardsbutlacksclarity.Illustrateshowspecificlearningactivitiessupportlearningobjectives.
Illustratesorelucidatesclearlyandaccuratelyhowlearningobjectivessupportstandardsandunitlearninggoals.Illustratesclearlyandaccuratelyhowspecificlearningactivitiessupportlearningobjectives.
3C.TechnologyandLearningandCreativity:Describetechnologicaltoolsyouandthestudentswillusethatwillfacilitateandinspirestudentlearningandcreativity.Ifyoudonothaveaccesstothetools,describewhatyouwouldhaveused.(1.000,14%)
Lessthanbeneficialutilizationoftechnology.Usesmaybeoflimitedbenefittostudentlearning.
Includesappropriateandthoughtfulstrategiesforapplyingtechnologytosupportstudentlearning.
Includesavarietyofappropriateandpedagogicallypowerfulstrategiesforapplyingtechnologytofosterstudentlearningandcreativity.
3D.AccommodatingindividualDifference:Describeandevaluatethemannerinwhichyourunitwasdifferentiatedtosupport
Candidatedescribesinadequateaccommodationsand/orsupportsfor
Describeshowtheunitwasdifferentiatedtosupportstudents’differentlearning
Clearlydescribesandevaluateshowtheunitwasdifferentiatedtomeettheneedsofallstudents.Severalspecificexamplesaregivenofhowlessonsweredifferentiated
P a g e 42 | 87
theneedsofindividuallearners.Givespecificexamplesofwhataccommodationsweremadeforindividualdifferencesinstylesandintelligences,interests,andabilities.Describehowyouwillsupportstudents’languageneedsandthosewithspecialneedsatallpointsonthecontinuum.
thestudents’learningneeds.
stylesandintelligences,interestandreadiness.Someexamplesareprovided.
forarangeofstylesandintelligences,interests,andabilities.SupportforstudentswithspecialneedsandthoseforwhomEnglishisasecondlanguageiscarefullydescribed.
3E.Crosscurricularintegration:Includedescriptionsandexamplesofcross‐curricularorthematicconnectionsintotheunit,includinghowthematerialwasconnectedtootherareasofschoolorlife.Bespecificaboutexamplesofliteracyinstruction.(1.000,14%)
Literacyintegrationisnotincluded,integrationwithothersubjectareasisnotdescribed.
Literacyintegrationisthoughtfullyincluded.Whereappropriate,integrationwithothersubjectareasisincluded.
Carefullyintegratesliteracyinstruction.Whereappropriate,integrationwithothersubjectareasisthorough.
3F.ConnectionbetweenCQandunitofStudy:InwhatwaysdoestheplanningsupportresearchontheCriticalQuestionandtheessentialcurriculumunitquestion?(1.000,14%)
Littleconnectionexistsbetweenplanning,pedagogyandCQ.UnitdoesnotcontaincleardescriptionsofhowdatawillbecollectedonyourCQ.
Connectionexistsbetweenplanning,pedagogy,andCQ.HowdatawillbecollectedonyourCQisanelementofyourunit.
Connectionbetweenplanning,pedagogy,andCQisexplicit.LessonsarticulatehowtriangulateddataonyourCQwillbecollectedasanintegratedelementofyourunit.
3G.Calendar:Thisisthetableofcontentsforyourunit.Thecalendarprovidesavisualrepresentationofthetimingandteachingofyourunit.Usethistohyperlinktoallofyourdocuments,andartifactsincludingvideosandcorrespondencewithfamiliesorstudents(1.000,14%)
Notalllessonplans,assessments,andvideosarenotedandhyperlinkedtosupportingdocumentationorevidence.Communicationandcorrespondencewithparentsisnotpresent.
Alllessonplans,withtheirtitles,assessments,andvideosarenoted.Eachishyperlinkedtosupportingdocumentationorevidence.Allcommunicationandcorrespondencewithparentsisnotedandhyperlinked.
Alllessonplans,withtheirtitles,assessments,andvideosarenotes.Eachishyperlinkedtosupportingdocumentationorevidence.Allcommunicationandcorrespondencewithparentsisnotedandhyperlinked.
FacilitatingLearning(FocusonLessons)
P a g e 43 | 87
4A.PlanningforLearning:Coverslessonplanningelements.Thisincludesstandards,targets,andobjectives,aswellastheplanningformaterialsanddifferentiationstrategies.(1.000,20%)
Lessonsdonotflowandarenotwellplanned.Standards,targets,andobjectivesmaybeinmisalignment.Universaldesignanddifferentiationsaremissing.
Lessonsarewellplannedandorganized.Standards,targets,andobjectivesarealigned.Universaldesignisapparentandadequatedifferentiationsareevident.
Lessonsarethoroughlyplannedandthoughtfullyorganized.Standards,targets,andobjectivesaretightlyaligned.Lessonsmanifestpurposefuluniversaldesignaswellasdifferentiationswhereappropriate.
4B.FacilitatingtheLearningProcess:Includestheactivelessonprocessfromintroducingthelesson,throughallofthelessonactivitiesandconcludingwiththelessonclosures.(1.000,20%)
Lessonsmayneglectappropriateintroortargetsharing.Teachersutilizeinappropriateorineffectiveinstructionalstrategiesandmaterials.Closuremaynotbepresent.
Lessonsbeginwithintroductionsandsharingoftargets.Teachersutilizeappropriateinstructionalstrategies,andappropriatelearningmaterials(includingtechnologies).Lessonsendwithsummaryclosures.
Lessonsbeginwithappropriateandengagingintroductionsincludingsharingoftargets.Lessonscontainsappropriateinstructionalstrategies,andstudent‐centeredactivelearningmaterials(includingtechnologies).Lessonsendwiththoughtfulintegratingclosures.
4C.AssessingLearning:Howeffectiveweretheplannedassessmentsindeterminingifstudentshadmetlearningtargetsandlessonobjectives.(1.000,20%)
Assessmentsdonotprovidesufficientorvalidevidencethatstudentshavemetlessonobjectives,learningtargets,unitgoals,andmadeprogresstowardsmeetingidentifiedstandards.
Plannedassessmentsareeffectiveindeterminingifstudentsmetlessonobjectives,learningtargets,unitgoals,andmadeprogresstowardsmeetingidentifiedstandards.
Awiderangeofplannedassessmentsareeffectiveindeterminingifstudentsmetlessonobjectives,learningtargets,unitgoals,andmadeprogresstowardsmeetingidentifiedstandards.
4D.AnalysisandReflection:Whatarethedatathatyougatheredaboutyourteachingandyourstudentlearning?Whatevaluationandsynthesescanyouconstructregardingyouractionsandyourcriticalquestion?(1.000,20%)
Analyticalandreflectivenotesareweakandlackinginthoughtfulreflection.Connectionstoplanning,methods,instructionalmaterialsortocriticalquestionmaynotbeevident.
Analyticalandreflectivenotesareadequatecontainingthoughtfulreflections.Connectionstoplanning,methods,instructionalmaterials,andtocriticalquestionareevident.
Analyticalandreflectivenotescontainthickdatadeeplevelofanalysisandlevelsofthoughtfulreflections.Connectionstoplanning,methods,instructionalmaterials,andtocriticalquestionaremadeexplicit.
4E.edTPAVideo
P a g e 44 | 87
(1.000,20%)AnalysisofLearning5A.WholeClass:Wholeclassanalysisofdatareflectinglearninggainsacrosstriangulatedassessmentdataforeachidentifiedlearningoutcome.(1.000,33%)
Analysisofdataisfaultyandincomplete.
Dataanalysiscontainsaccuratedataandnarrativeexplanationofresults.
Dataanalysiscontainsaccuratequantitativedataandappropriatenarrativeexplainingthosedataalongwithpossiblereasonsforthoseresults.
5B.IndividualStudents:Analysisofindividualstudentdatareflectinglearninggainsacrosstriangulatedassessmentdataforeachidentifiedlearningoutcome.(1.000,33%)
Analysisoflearninggainsislimitedtoquantitativedataonfinalassessment.
Analysisofindividuallearninggainsforeachstudentcontainsdataonbothassessmentsforalllearninggoals.
Analysisofindividuallearninggainsisaccurate,andprovidedforeachstudentforalllearninggoalsusingpre‐andpost‐assessments.Narrativeexplanationofdatacontainrationaleforresults.
5C.SharingResults:Communicatelearninggainstostudentandfamily.(1.000,33%)
Communicationwithstudentsandorfamiliesisminimalandbroad,inaddressingtheentireclass.
Communicationwithstudentsandfamiliesisclear,andprovidesinformationthatwillallowstudentsandfamiliestoacknowledgegrowthandareasforattention.
Communicationwithstudentsandfamiliesisclear,anddemonstratesadesiretopartnerwiththestudentandfamilytopromotelearninggains,andincludesindividualstudentneeds.
SynthesisandFinalEvaluationofTIP6A.CriticalQuestion:Describewhatyouthoughtyouknewaboutyourcriticalquestion,whatyounowunderstandaboutyourquestion,andhowyouhavecometolearnthis.Includecriticalcolleaguefeedbackandresponse.Citeandusedatacollected.ConnecttokeypiecesofliteratureusedintheplanningofyourTIP.(1.000,25%)
Reflectiononthedevelopmentofthecriticalquestionacrosstimearemissing.Criticalcolleaguefeedbackisnotprovidedoranalyzed.Connectionstopreviousliteraturearenotevident.
Includespreconceptionsofcriticalquestion,currentunderstanding,andhowyouhavecometolearnthis.Criticalcolleaguefeedbackisincluded.Connectionstolitreviewaredescribed.
Includespreconceptionsofcriticalquestion,currentunderstanding,andhowyouhavecometolearnthis.Criticalcolleaguefeedbackandresponsesareprovidedasareyourdata.ConnectionstokeypiecesofliteratureusedintheplanningofyourTIPareincluded.
6B.AnalysisofTriangulatedAssessmentTool:Describetheusefulnessandlimitations
Utilityandlimitationsofthevariousassessment
Utilityandlimitationsofthevariousassessment
Utilityandlimitationsofthevariousassessmenttoolsarecarefullydescribedandanalyzed.Reflections
P a g e 45 | 87
ofthevariousassessmenttoolsimplemented.Whathaveyoulearnedaboutthedesignofassessmentsandthecollectionoftriangulateddata?(1.000,25%)
toolsareomittedorperfunctory.Reflectionsonthedesignofassessmentsandthecollectionoftriangulatedataareweakormissing.
toolsaredescribed.Somereflectionsonthedesignofassessmentsandthecollectionoftriangulateddataareprovided.
onthedesignofassessmentsandthecollectionoftriangulateddataareprovided.
6C.CriticalSelf‐Reflexivity:DeconstructthedatageneratedbytheTIPandyourcriticalquestion.Whataretheimplicationsforselfasalearner,teacher,andcollaborator?Consideringfutureprofessionaldevelopmentgoalsbasedonthisexperience.(1.000,25%)
Writingdisplaysminimalself‐reflexivityandfocusesonstudentissues.
Writingexpressesawarenessofstrengthsandweaknesseswithconsiderationoffutureprofessionaldevelopment.
Highqualityanalyticmemo thatdemonstratesdeepself‐reflexivitythatacknowledgesstrengthsshownintheunitandidentifiesspecificareasforgrowth.Includesclearstrategies.
6D.ProfessionalWritingandAttentiontoDetails:TheTIPshouldbepresentedasafinishedproduct,withcarefulattentiontothequalityofthewriting.Allrelevantartifactshavebeenscannedandareincluded.(1.000,25%)
Containsrepeatederrorsinsyntax,grammar,orpunctuation.
Carefulattentiontowritingconventionsisdemonstrated.
Exceptionalskillinwriting,editing,andpresentingworkisdemonstrated.
SpecialEducationWorkSampleRubric
Missing NoPass Pass SuperiorPassTitlePageSetting:Describesthesettingwhereinstructionwilltakeplacetoincludedistrict,school,classroomandinstructionalarrangements.Describesworksamplegroup/studentsselected.(INTASC‐2013.2)
Rationale:Statestopic/unitofstudy/overarchinggoal,andwhyunitisimportantforstudentstolearnnowandinthefuture.Includesreferenceto
P a g e 46 | 87
research/evidence‐basedpractice.Includesreference/linktoIEPgoals/objectivesandschoolobjectives.Includesreferencetostandardsandgeneraleducationcurriculum.(INTASC‐2013‐1)CONTENTRELATIONSHIPS:Agraphicrepresentationoftheorganizationofthetopicthatshowshowthetopiccontentisbrokendownand/orconnectedtosmallercomponents.Note:thisisnotaunitmapbutanexplorationoftopic.(INTASC‐2013‐5)
LEARNINGOBJECTIVES:ClearlystatesWStopicgoal–whatstudentswilllearnbyendofWS.Showslinkfromgoaltostatestandardsand/orbenchmarksatstudent’sgradelevel.IdentifiesIEPgoal(s)and/orshort‐termobjectivestargetedduringtheWSforeachparticipatingstudent.Includes2‐3measurableinstructionalobjectives(conditions,behaviorandcriteria)thatsupporttheWStopicgoalandcanbemeasuredatbeginningandendofWS.(INTASC2013.4)
KEYPOINTS,TERMSandVOCABULARY:Lists10‐20keypointsand/orbigideasaroundthetopic.Identifiestermsandvocabularyspecifictothetopic.Maylist5‐10keypointsaroundco‐curriculargoals.(INTASC2013.4)
PRE‐REQUISITESKILLS:Identifiesfoundational(pre‐requisiteskillsstudentsneedtohavetobenefitfromandparticipateinWS.IdentifieswhatstudentsknowrelatedtotheWSbasedonPresentLevelsofAcademicAchievementandFunctionalPerformance(PLAAAFP),observationsand/ortesting.(INTASC2013‐2)
P a g e 47 | 87
CO‐CURRICULARGOALS:Identifiesco‐curricularcontentorskillsstudentsmightlearn,whicharenotmeasuredbylearninggoals.IdentifiespossiblealternativeoutcomesoftheWSoutsideofIEP(INTASC‐2013.5)
ADAPTATIONS:ACCOMMODATIONS&MODIFICATIONS:IdentifiesadaptationsforeachstudentandhighlightsthoseconsideredinthisWS.Describesstudentdiversityincluding:diversityinculture,race,language,abilities,and/orlearningstyles.Identifieswhatwasdonetoaddressdiversityandlanguagedifferencesamongstudentgroupandforindividualstudents,ifappropriate.(INTASC‐2013.8)
WEEKLYPLAN:CalendarwithlessontitlesandmajoractivitiesforeachdayoverthecourseoftheWStoincludeplanforinitialassessment(datesandtimes)andfinalassessment.(INTASC‐2013.7)
BEHAVIORPLAN:Includesschoolbehaviorplan.Includesclassroomproceduresandrules.Includesbehaviorsupportplan(s)forstudentswhohaveone.IncludesexpectationsandbehaviorplanspecifictoteachingWSlessons.(INTASC‐2013.3)
TECHNOLOGY:Includesuseoftechnologyinplanning,presenting,andconductinginstruction.Thiscanbetechnologyusedbytheteacherand/orthestudents.Notesstudentswhouseassistivetechnology.(INTASC‐2013.5)
INITIALASSESSMENT:Authentic,teacher‐made,orprescribedinitialassessmentwhichadequatelyreflectseachstudent’sbaselineknowledgeandperformancerelatedtoworksampleobjectives.Assessmentoutcomesareclearlydescribedandsummarized.
P a g e 48 | 87
Resultsrepresentedwithdataand/orstudentproduct.Includesclearcriteriatodeterminelevelofachievement(i.e.,criteriaorscoringguide)andlegendoranswerkey.(INTASC‐2013.6)DETERMINEINSTRUCTIONALSTARTINGPOINT:Summarizes/interpretsresultsofinitialassessmentanditsconnectionwithplanforinstruction.Showsclearlinkbetweeninitialassessmentanddeterminationofinstructionalstartingpoint(i.e.,providesrationaleofwheretostartinstructioninrelationtostageoflearning:acquisition,fluency,maintenance,orgeneralization)(INTASC‐2013.6)
DAILYLESSONPLANSUSED:LessonPlanWorksheetwithallsectionscompletefor10lessons.InstructionalobjectivesaremeasurableandclearlyalignedwithinstructionalplansandWSobjectives.Instructionalplandetailedtoshowtheteaching.Includeschanges/adjustmentsmadetoinstruction(INTASC‐2013.7)
FORMATIVE(On‐going)ASSESSMENT:Eachlessonplanhasameasureofstudentperformancerelatedtodailylessonobjectivesand/orIEPobjectives.Datamethodevidentindailylessonplan.Formativeassessmentmaybeformalorinformation,teacher‐madeorcommerciallyavailablebutmustbemeasurable.(INTASC‐2013.6)
DAILYREFLECTION:Dailyreflectionwrittenabouteachlessonstatingwhatworkedwell,whatwoulddodifferentlyifteachinglessonagain,whattoconsiderfornextlesson–whatworked?Whattokeeporchange?Summarizesstudentperformance,attitude,andreactiontoreinforcement.(INTASC‐2013.9)
P a g e 49 | 87
FINAL(SUMMATIVE)ASSESSMENT:Methodandmeasurementissameorsimilartoinitialassessment.Resultssummarizedforfinalassessment.Thefinalassessmentshouldrepresentauthenticperformancetask(s).Studentsmustperformatask,carryoutanactivity,orproduceaproduct.Includesclearcriteriatodeterminelevelofachievement(i.e.,criteriaorscoringguide).Includealegendoranswerkey.(INTASC‐2013.6)
SUMMARIZEANDINTERPRETASSESSMENTDATACOMPOSITOFALLASSESSMENTS:INITIAL,FORMATIVEandFINAL.ShowslearningandprogressofstudentsovercourseoftheWSinrelationtotheWSgoalandWSobjectives.AnalysisofthedataandareportontheeffectoftheWSforstudentsandteacher.Comparesandcontrastsstudents.Includereflectiononwhatassessmentdatashowsabouttheirteaching.IncludesspecificrecommendationstotheIEPteambasedontheassessmentdata.Resultssummarizedinanarrativeandorganizedinagraph,tableorchart(INTASC‐2013.6)
FEEDBACK:Includesasummary/logofallcontactswithhomeapplicabletoWSandstudents.Includesasummary/logofallcontactswithschoolstaffpertinenttothestudentsandWS.(INTASC‐2013.10)
RESOURCES:Includesalistofresourcesusedtolearnaboutandteachthetopic,andpotentialresources.(INTASC‐2013.5)
EVALUATIONOFYOURTEACHING:FINALREFLECTIONIncludesinsightaboutstudents,topic,process,andteaching.Discusseswhatworkedwellandwhatwouldbedonedifferentlyin
P a g e 50 | 87
thefutureandwhy.Revealswhatwaslearnedaboutstudents.Considersifanythingneedstoberetaughtorincorporatedintonextunit.Includesaself‐evaluationofexperienceasateacher.(INTASC‐2013.9)OVERALLPRESENTATION:Professionalproductwithattentiontodetailandqualityofwriting.
StudentTeachingSummaryEvaluation(v.2007)
STANDARD1:PLANFORINSTRUCTION 0pts
Notyetabletodemonstratetheknowledge,skillsandcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmanylearners.(HasnotmetthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicenseduringstudentteaching.)
1ptDevelopingawarenessandbeginningtodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(HasthepotentialtomeetthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.)
2 ptsDevelopingawarenessandbeginningtodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(HasthepotentialtomeetthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.)
3 ptsKnowsanddemon‐stratestheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(RegularlymeetsthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.)
4ptsKnowsanddemon‐stratestheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(RegularlymeetsthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.)
5 ptsKnowsanddemon‐strateswelltheknowledgeskillsandcompetenciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(ExceedsthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.Candidateperformsatthelevelexpectedofanexperiencedteacher.)
6 ptsKnowsanddemon‐strateswelltheknowledgeskillsandcompetenciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(ExceedsthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.Candidateperformsatthelevelexpectedofanexperiencedteacher.)
P a g e 51 | 87
1.A.Selectorwritelearninggoalsforunitsofinstructionthatareconsistentwiththeschool’slongtermcurriculumgoals,Statestandardsanddistrictstandards,researchonfindingsonhowstudentslearn,andthephysicalandmentalmaturityofone’sstudents:(INTASC‐2013.7)
1.B.Determinethecurrentperfor‐mancelevelofone’sstudentswithrespecttothelearninggoalsestablishedforaunitofinstruction(INTASC‐2013.7)
P a g e 52 | 87
1.C.Establishobjectiveswithintheunitofinstructionthatwillbeusefulinformulatingdailylessonsandinevaluatingtheprogressofstudentstowardthealignmentofunitgoals(INTASC‐2013.7)
1.D.Determinecontent,skillsandprocessesthatwillassiststudentsinaccomplish‐ingdesiredunitoutcomes,anddesignlearningactivitiesthatleadtotheirmastery(INTASC‐2013.7)
1.E.Selectadorganizematerials,
P a g e 53 | 87
equipment,andtechnolo‐giesneededtoteachaunitofinstruction(INTASC‐2013.8)1.F.Designandadaptunitandlessonplansforalllearnersandexceptionallearners,includingbutnotlimitedtostudentswithvaryingcultural,social,socio‐economicandlinguisticback‐grounds(INTASC‐2013.2)
1.G.Estimatethetimerequiredwithinaunitforteacher‐directedinstruction,student‐
P a g e 54 | 87
managedlearningandpractice,studentevaluation/reportandre‐teaching/problemsolving.(INTASC‐2013.8)STANDARD2:ESTABLISHCLASSROOMCLIMATE 0pts
Notyetabletodemonstratetheknowledge,skillsandcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmanylearners.(HasnotmetthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicenseduringstudentteaching.)
1ptDevelopingawarenessandbeginningtodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(HasthepotentialtomeetthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.)
2ptsDevelopingawarenessandbeginningtodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(HasthepotentialtomeetthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.)
3ptsKnowsanddemon‐stratestheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(RegularlymeetsthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.)
4ptsKnowsanddemon‐stratestheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(RegularlymeetsthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.)
5 ptsKnowsanddemon‐strateswelltheknowledgeskillsandcompetenciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(ExceedsthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.Candidateperformsatthelevelexpectedofanexperiencedteacher.)
6 ptsKnowsanddemon‐strateswelltheknowledgeskillsandcompetenciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(ExceedsthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.Candidateperformsatthelevelexpectedofanexperiencedteacher.)
P a g e 55 | 87
2.A.Affirmthedignityandworthofallstudentsandprovidepositivethesupportstudentsneedtobeeffectivelearners(INTASC‐2013.3)
2.B.Establish,communi‐cate,andmaintainrules,proceduresandbehavioralexpecta‐tionsthatprovideasafeandorderlyenviron‐mentforlearning,areappropriatetothelevelofdevelop‐mentofstudents,andareconsistentwithlawsgoverningstudentrightsandresponsibil‐
P a g e 56 | 87
ities(INTASC‐2013.3)2.C.Employequitablepracticesthatarejustandthatsupportaleastrestrictiveenviron‐mentforallstudents(INTASC‐2013.2)
2.D.Modelandreinforceclassroomsocialbehaviorthatsupportsstudentlearninganddevelop‐ment(INTASC‐2013.3)
2.E.Useknowledgeoftheinfluenceofthephysical,social,andemotionalclimatesofstudents’homesandthecommunity
P a g e 57 | 87
tooptimizemotivation,learningandbehavior(INTASC‐2013.1)2.F.Monitorstudentconduct,andtakeappropriateactionwhenmis‐behavioroccurs(INTASC‐2013.3)
2.G.Interactthought‐fullyandcourteouslywithallstudentsandtheirfamiliesandseektoresolveconflictsinaprofessionalmanner,respectingfamilialandcommunityculturalcontexts(INTASC‐2013.3)
2.H.Useclassroomtimeeffectivelytoprovide
P a g e 58 | 87
formaximumtimeforlearning(INTASC‐2013.3)2.I.Manageinstruction‐altransitionsdecisivelyandwithoutlossofinstruction‐altime(INTASC‐2013.3)
2.J.Arrangeandsetupinstruction‐almaterialsandequipmentinadvanceofclasstofacilitatetheireffectiveandefficientuseduringlessons(INTASC‐2013.3)
2.K.Coordinatetheuseofinstruction‐alassistants,parentvolunteers,studentassistants,andother
P a g e 59 | 87
supportpersonneltoachieveinstruction‐alobjectivesiftheseresourcesareavailableintheschoolsetting.(INTASC‐2013.3)STANDARD3:STANDARDSBASEDTEACHING 0pts
Notyetabletodemonstratetheknowledge,skillsandcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmanylearners.(HasnotmetthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicenseduringstudentteaching.)
1ptDevelopingawarenessandbeginningtodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(HasthepotentialtomeetthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.)
2ptsDevelopingawarenessandbeginningtodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(HasthepotentialtomeetthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.)
3ptsKnowsanddemon‐stratestheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(RegularlymeetsthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.)
4ptsKnowsanddemon‐stratestheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(RegularlymeetsthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.)
5 ptsKnowsanddemon‐strateswelltheknowledgeskillsandcompetenciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(ExceedsthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.Candidateperformsatthelevelexpectedofanexperiencedteacher.)
6 ptsKnowsanddemon‐strateswelltheknowledgeskillsandcompetenciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(ExceedsthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.Candidateperformsatthelevelexpectedofanexperiencedteacher.)
P a g e 60 | 87
3.A.Chooseorganizat‐ionalstructuresappropriatefortheobjectivesofinstruction(INTASC‐2013.4)
3.B.Communi‐catelearningoutcomestobeachievedandfocusstudentinterestontaskstobeaccomp‐lished(INTASC‐2013.4)
3.C.Implementinstruction‐alplansthatemployknowledgeofsubjectmatterandbasicskills(INTASC‐2013.5)
3.D.Useavarietyofresearch‐basededucationalpracticesthatpromote
P a g e 61 | 87
studentlearningandaresensitivetoindividualdifferencesanddiversecultures(INTASC‐2013.2)3.E.Emphasizeinstruction‐altechniquesthatpromotecriticalthinkingandproblem‐solving,andthatencouragedivergentaswellasconvergentthinking(INTASC‐2013.5)
3.F.Monitortheengagementofstudentsinlearningactivities,andtheprogresstheyaremaking,todetermineifthepaceorcontentofinstruction
P a g e 62 | 87
needstobemodifiedtoassurethatallstudentsaccomplishlessonandunitobjectives.STANDARD4:ASSESSMENT 0pts
Notyetabletodemonstratetheknowledge,skillsandcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmanylearners.(HasnotmetthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicenseduringstudentteaching.)
1ptDevelopingawarenessandbeginningtodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(HasthepotentialtomeetthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.)
2ptsDevelopingawarenessandbeginningtodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(HasthepotentialtomeetthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.)
3ptsKnowsanddemon‐stratestheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(RegularlymeetsthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.)
4ptsKnowsanddemon‐stratestheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(RegularlymeetsthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.)
5ptsKnowsanddemon‐strateswelltheknowledgeskillsandcompetenciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(ExceedsthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.Candidateperformsatthelevelexpectedofanexperiencedteacher.)
6 ptsKnowsanddemon‐strateswelltheknowledgeskillsandcompetenciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(ExceedsthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.Candidateperformsatthelevelexpectedofanexperiencedteacher.)
4.A.Selectordevelopnon‐biased,validandreliabletests,
P a g e 63 | 87
perfor‐mancemeasures,observa‐tions,studentinterviewsorotherformalorinformalassessmentprocedurestodeterminetheprogressofallstudents(INTASC‐2013.6)4.B.Documentstudentprogressinaccomplish‐ingState‐adoptedcontentstandardsanddistrictstandards,preparedatasummariesthatshowthisprogresstoothers,andinformstudents,supervisors,andparentsaboutprogressinlearning
P a g e 64 | 87
(INTASC‐2013.6)4.C.Refineplansforinstruction,establishalternativegoalsorenviron‐ments,ormakereferralswhenappropriate(INTASC‐2013.6)
4.D.Assemble,reflectupon,interpretandcommuni‐cateevidenceofone’sowneffective‐nessasateacherincludingevidenceofsuccessinfosteringstudentprogressinlearninganduseevidenceofeffective‐nessinplanningfurtherinstruction
P a g e 65 | 87
(INTASC‐2013.6)STANDARD5:CONTENTKNOWLEDGE 0pts
Notyetabletodemonstratetheknowledge,skillsandcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmanylearners.(HasnotmetthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicenseduringstudentteaching.)
1ptDevelopingawarenessandbeginningtodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(HasthepotentialtomeetthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.)
2ptsDevelopingawarenessandbeginningtodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(HasthepotentialtomeetthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.)
3ptsKnowsanddemon‐stratestheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(RegularlymeetsthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.)
4ptsKnowsanddemon‐stratestheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(RegularlymeetsthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.)
5ptsKnowsanddemon‐strateswelltheknowledgeskillsandcompetenciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(ExceedsthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.Candidateperformsatthelevelexpectedofanexperiencedteacher.)
6 ptsKnowsanddemon‐strateswelltheknowledgeskillsandcompetenciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(ExceedsthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.Candidateperformsatthelevelexpectedofanexperiencedteacher.)
5.A.Understandthesubject(s)beingtaughtandappreciatehowknowledgeinthatsubjectiscreated,
P a g e 66 | 87
organizedandlinkedtootherdisciplinesandappliedinreal‐worldsettings(INTASC‐2013.4)5.B.Selectandsequencedisciplinarycontenttosupportfuturelearninginandoutofschool(INTASC‐2013.4)
5.C.Evaluatestudents’initialconceptionsandprovideopportune‐itiestogainadeeperandmoreusefulunderstanding
5.D.Presentcontentinavarietyofwaysthatareclearandappriop‐riateforstudents
P a g e 67 | 87
5.E.Adapt/modifycontentknowledgeforexceptionallearners,includingtalentedandgifted(INTASC‐2013‐5)
5.F.Linkcontenttostudents’knowledgeexperienceandinterestsaswellastoothercontentdisciplinesandrealworldphenomena(INTASC‐2013.5)
5.G.Utilizearangeofinstruction‐alresourcesandtechnologytoolstoenhancelearning(INTASC‐2013.5)
5.H.Engagestudentsinpedagogic‐allypowerful
P a g e 68 | 87
applicationsoftechnologythatfosterlearning(INTASC‐2013.5)5.I.Provideopportuni‐tiesforstudentstousecontentknowledgetothinkandproblemsolve(INTASC‐2013.5)
STANDARD6:PROFESSIONALBEHAVIOR 0pts
Notyetabletodemonstratetheknowledge,skillsandcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmanylearners.(HasnotmetthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicenseduringstudentteaching.)
1ptDevelopingawarenessandbeginningtodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(HasthepotentialtomeetthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.)
2ptsDevelopingawarenessandbeginningtodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(HasthepotentialtomeetthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.)
3ptsKnowsanddemon‐stratestheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(RegularlymeetsthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.)
4ptsKnowsanddemon‐stratestheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(RegularlymeetsthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.)
5 ptsKnowsanddemon‐strateswelltheknowledgeskillsandcompetenciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(ExceedsthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.Candidateperformsatthelevelexpectedof
6 ptsKnowsanddemon‐strateswelltheknowledgeskillsandcompetenciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(ExceedsthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.Candidateperformsatthelevelexpectedof
P a g e 69 | 87
anexperiencedteacher.)
anexperiencedteacher.)
6.A.Bedependable,conscient‐iousandpunctual(INTASC‐2013.9)
6.B.Meetworkscheduledemands(INTASC‐2013.9)
6.C.Beawareoftheimportanceofdressingappropriate‐ly(INTASC‐2013.9)
6.D.Beawareof,andactinaccordancewith,schoolpoliciesandpractices(INTASC2013.9)
6.E.Understandtheorganiza‐tionalcultureandexpecta‐tionsthatoperate
P a g e 70 | 87
withinaschoolandthatimpactstudentsandstudentlearning(INTASC‐2013‐10)6.F.Interactconstruct‐ivelyandrespectfullywithstudents,colleagues,administrat‐ors,supervisors,schoolstaff,families,andmembersofthecommunity(INTASC‐2013.10)
6.G.Collaboratewithparents,colleagues,andmembersofthecommunitytoprovideinternalandexternalassistancetostudentsandtheirfamiliestopromotestudent
P a g e 71 | 87
learning(INTASC‐2013.10)6.H.Performadvisoryfunctionsforstudentsinformalandinformalsettings(INTASC‐2013.10)
6.I.Functionasamemberofaninter‐disciplinaryteamtoachievelong‐termcurriculumgoalsandStatecontentstandardsanddistrictstandards.
6.J.Exhibitenergy,driveanddetermin‐ationtomakeone’sschoolandclassroomthebestpossibleenviron‐mentforteachingandlearning
P a g e 72 | 87
(INTASC‐2013.10)6.K.Exhibitenergy,driveanddeterminationtobecomeaprofessionaleducator(INTASC‐2013.10)
StudentTeachingSummaryEvaluation(v.2014)
AssessmentPlanning: 0pts
Notyetabletodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmanylearners.(HasnotmetthestandardsfortheITLduringstudentteaching.)
1ptDevelopingawarenessandbeginningtodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(HasthepotentialtomeetthestandardsfortheITL).
2ptsDevelopingawarenessandbeginningtodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(HasthepotentialtomeetthestandardsfortheITL).
3ptsKnowsanddemon‐stratestheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(RegularlymeetsthestandardsforITL).
4ptsKnowsanddemonstratestheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(RegularlymeetsthestandardsforITL).
5 ptsKnowsanddemon‐strateswelltheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(ExceedsthestandardsfortheITL.Candidateperformsatthelevelexpectedofanexperiencedteacher.)
6 ptsKnowsanddemon‐strateswelltheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(ExceedsthestandardsfortheITL.Candidateperformsatthelevelexpectedofanexperiencedteacher.)
P a g e 73 | 87
Createsdevelop‐mentallyappropriateunits/lessons(INTASC‐2013.1.b)
Createsdevelop‐mentallyappropriateunits/less‐ons(INTASC2013.1.b)
Developslearningexperiencesthatengagelearners.(INTASC‐2013.3.b)
Createsopportuni‐tiesforstudentstolearnandpracticeacademiclanguage,methodsofinquiry.(INTASC‐2013.4.cINTASC‐2013.4.h)
Developsprojectsthatguidelearnersinanalyzingthecomplex‐
P a g e 74 | 87
itiesofissuesusinghigherorderquestionsandmetacogni‐tivestrategiestoexploreperspect‐ivesfromvarieddisciplines.(INTASC‐2013.5.aINTASC‐2013.8.f)Engageslearnersinapplyingcontentknowledgetorealworldproblems.(INTASC‐2013.5.b)
Choosesappropriatestrategiesandaccomm‐odationresources,andmaterialstodifferen‐tiateinstruction(INTASC‐2013.7.b)
Createsappropriate
P a g e 75 | 87
objectivesforsequencingoflearning.(INTASC‐2013.7.c)Plansforinstructionbasedonformativeandsummativeassessmentdata,priorlearnerknowledge,andlearnerinterests.(INTASC‐2013.7.d)
ExecutingInstruction/Practice 0pts
Notyetabletodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmanylearners.(HasnotmetthestandardsfortheITLduringstudentteaching.)
1ptDevelopingawarenessandbeginningtodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(HasthepotentialtomeetthestandardsfortheITL.)
2ptsDevelopingawarenessandbeginningtodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(HasthepotentialtomeetthestandardsfortheITL.)
3ptsKnowsanddemon‐stratestheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(RegularlymeetsthestandardsforITL.)
4ptsKnowsanddemon‐stratestheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(RegularlymeetsthestandardsforITL.)
5ptsKnowsanddemon‐strateswelltheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(ExceedsthestandardsfortheITL.Candidateperformsatthelevelexpectedofan
6 ptsKnowsanddemon‐strateswelltheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(ExceedsthestandardsfortheITL.Candidateperformsatthelevelexpectedofan
P a g e 76 | 87
experiencedteacher.)
experiencedteacher.)
Deliversandadaptsinstructiontoaddressarangeofdiverselearningstrengthsandneedsandcreatesopportuni‐tiesforstudentstodemon‐stratetheirlearningindifferentways.(INTASC‐2013.2.a)
Bringsmultipleanddiverseperspec‐tivestothediscussionofcontentandencouragesstudentstounderstand,question,andanalyzeideas.(INTASC‐2013.2.d)
Managesthelearningenviron‐menttoactivelyand
P a g e 77 | 87
equitableengagelearners.(INTASC‐2013.3.d)Effectivelyusesmultiplerepresenta‐tionsandexplana‐tionsthatcapturekeyideasinthediscipline.(INTASC‐2013.4.a)
Stimulateslearnerreflectiononpriorcontentknowledge,linksnewconceptstofamiliarconcepts,andmakesconnectionstolearners’experiences(INTASC‐2013.4.d)
Usessupple‐mentaryresourcesandtechnolo‐gieseffectivelytocreatebetterlearning
P a g e 78 | 87
opportuni‐tiesforstudents.(INTASC‐2013.4.g)Usingavarietyofinstruct‐tionalstrategies,developsandimplementssupportsforlearnerliteracydevelop‐mentacrosscontentareas,engaginglearners’communica‐tionskills.(INTASC‐2013.5.h)
Engagesalllearnersindevelopinghigherorderquestioningskillsandmeta‐cognitiveprocesses.(INTASC‐2013.8.f)
AssessingLearningandTeaching 0pts
Notyetabletodemon‐stratetheknowledge,
1ptDevelopingawarenessandbeginning
2ptsDevelopingawarenessandbeginning
3ptsKnowsanddemon‐stratestheknowledge,
4ptsKnowsanddemon‐stratestheknowledge,
5ptsKnowsanddemon‐strateswellthe
6 ptsKnowsanddemon‐strateswellthe
P a g e 79 | 87
skillsandcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmanylearners.(HasnotmetthestandardsfortheITLduringstudentteaching.)
todemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(HasthepotentialtomeetthestandardsfortheITL.)
todemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(HasthepotentialtomeetthestandardsfortheITL.)
skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(RegularlymeetsthestandardsforthePreliminaryTeachingLicense.)
skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(RegularlymeetsthestandardsforITL.)
knowledgeskillsandcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(ExceedsthestandardsfortheITL.Candidateperformsatthelevelexpectedofanexperiencedteacher.)
knowledgeskillsandcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(ExceedsthestandardsfortheITL.Candidateperformsatthelevelexpectedofanexperiencedteacher.)
Designsdevelop‐mentallyappropriateassess‐mentsthatmatchlearningobjectives.(INTASC‐2013.6.b)
Worksindepen‐dentlyandcollabora‐tivelytoexaminetestandotherperfor‐mancedatatounderstand
P a g e 80 | 87
eachlearner’sprogressandtoguideplanning.(INTASC‐2013.6.c)Continuous‐lymonitorsstudentlearning,engageslearnersinassessingtheirprogress,andadjustsinstructioninresponsetostudentlearningneeds.(INTASC‐2013.8.b)
InteractionswithStudents/Families(LearningEnvironments) 0pts
Notyetabletodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmanylearners.(HasnotmetthestandardsfortheITLduringstudentteaching.)
1ptDevelopingawarenessandbeginningtodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(Hasthepotentialtomeetthe
2ptsDevelopingawarenessandbeginningtodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(Hasthepotentialtomeetthe
3ptsKnowsanddemon‐stratestheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(RegularlymeetsthestandardsforITL.)
4ptsKnowsanddemon‐stratestheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(RegularlymeetsthestandardsforITL.)
5ptsKnowsanddemon‐strateswelltheknowledgeskillsandcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(ExceedsthestandardsfortheITL.Candidate
6 ptsKnowsanddemon‐strateswelltheknowledgeskillsandcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(ExceedsthestandardsfortheITL.Candidate
P a g e 81 | 87
standardsfortheITL.)
standardsfortheITL.)
performsatthelevelexpectedofanexperiencedteacher.)
performsatthelevelexpectedofanexperiencedteacher.)
Communi‐catesinwaysthatdemon‐straterespectforandresponsive‐nesstotheculturalback‐groundsanddifferingperspect‐iveslearnersbringtothelearningenviron‐ment.(INTASC‐2013.3.f)
Under‐standshowpersonalidentity,worldview,andpriorexperienceaffectperceptionsandexpecta‐tions,andrecognizeshowthey
P a g e 82 | 87
maybiasbehaviorsandinteractionswithothersinordertobuildstrongerrelation‐shipsandcreatemorerelevantlearningexperiences(INTASC‐2013.9.i)Workscollabora‐tivelywithlearnersandtheirfamiliestoestablishmutualexpecta‐tionsandongoingcommuni‐cationtosupportlearnerdevelop‐mentandachieve‐ment.(INTASC‐2013.10.d)
Withschoolcolleagues,thecandidatebuildsongoingconnections
P a g e 83 | 87
withcommunityresourcestoenhancestudentlearningandwellbeing.(INTASC‐2013.10.e)Workingwith/ContributiontotheProfession 0pts
Notyetabletodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skillsandcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmanylearners.(HasnotmetthestandardsfortheITLduringstudentteaching).
1ptDevelopingawarenessandbeginningtodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(HasthepotentialtomeetthestandardsfortheITL.)
2ptsDevelopingawarenessandbeginningtodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(HasthepotentialtomeetthestandardsfortheITL.)
3ptsKnowsanddemon‐stratestheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(RegularlymeetsthestandardsfortheITL.)
4ptsKnowsanddemon‐stratestheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(RegularlymeetsthestandardsfortheITL.)
5ptsKnowsanddemon‐strateswelltheknowledgeskillsandcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(ExceedsthestandardsforITL.Candidateperformsatthelevelexpectedofanexperience‐dteacher.)
6 ptsKnowsanddemon‐strateswelltheknowledgeskillsandcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(ExceedsthestandardsforITL.Candidateperformsatthelevelexpectedofanexperience‐dteacher.)
Planscollabora‐tivelywithprofession‐alswhohavespecialized
P a g e 84 | 87
expertisetodesignandjointlydeliverasanappropriatelearning.(INTASC‐2013.7.e)Engagesinongoinglearningopportuni‐tiestodevelopknowledgeandskills.(INTASC‐2013.9.a)
Engagesinprofessionallearningthatsupportsanalysis,reflection,andproblem‐solving,contributestotheknowledgeandskillsofothers,andworkscollabora‐tivelytoadvanceprofessionalpractice.(INTASC‐2013.10.f)
CriticalDispositions
P a g e 85 | 87
0ptsNotyetabletodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skillsandcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmanylearners.(HasnotmetthestandardsfortheITLduringstudentteaching.)
1ptDevelopingawarenessandbeginningtodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(HasthepotentialtomeetthestandardsfortheITL.)
2ptsDevelopingawarenessandbeginningtodemon‐stratetheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(HasthepotentialtomeetthestandardsfortheITL.)
3ptsKnowsanddemon‐stratestheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(RegularlymeetsthestandardsfortheITL.)
4ptsKnowsanddemon‐stratestheknowledge,skills,andcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(RegularlymeetsthestandardsfortheITL.)
5 ptsKnowsanddemon‐strateswelltheknowledgeskillsandcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(ExceedsthestandardsfortheITL.Candidateperformsatthelevelexpectedofanexperiencedteacher.)
6 ptsKnowsanddemon‐strateswelltheknowledgeskillsandcompeten‐ciesneededtomeettheneedsofmostdiverselearners.(ExceedsthestandardsfortheITL.Candidateperformsatthelevelexpectedofanexperiencedteacher.)
Takesresponsibi‐lityforpromotinglearners’growthanddevelop‐ment.(INTASC‐2013.1.j)
Iscommittedtosupportinglearnersinpromotingeachother’s
P a g e 86 | 87
learning.(INTASC‐2013.3.p)Isathoughtfulandresponsivelistenerandobserver.(INTASC‐2013.3.r)
Recognizespotentialofbiasinhis/herrepresenta‐tionofthedisciplineandseekstoapprop‐riatelyaddressproblemsofbias.(INTASC‐2013.4.q)
Iscommittedtomakingaccomm‐odationinassessmentandtestingconditions,especiallyforlearnerswithdisabilitiesandlanguagelearningneeds.(INTASC‐2013.6.u)
P a g e 87 | 87
Activelysharesresponsibi‐lityforshapingandsupportingthemissionofhis/herschoolasanadvocateforlearnersandaccountabi‐lityfortheirsuccess.(INTASC‐2013.10.p)