cac & tcc agenda - river to sea tpo · iii. consent agenda a. review and approval of march 21,...
TRANSCRIPT
Please be advised that the River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC) & TECHNICAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE (TCC) will be meeting on:
DATE: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 TIME: 1:30 P.M. (CAC) & 3:00 P.M. (TCC) PLACE: River to Sea TPO Conference Room
2570 W. International Speedway Blvd., Suite 100 Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
****************************************************************************************** Ms. Judy Craig, CAC Chairperson Mr. Tim Burman, TCC Chairman
CAC & TCC AGENDA
I. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL / DETERMINATION OF QUORUM
II. PUBLIC COMMENT/PARTICIPATION (Public comments may be limited to three (3) minutes at the discretion ofthe Chairperson)
III. CONSENT AGENDA
A. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF APRIL 18, 2017 CAC/TCC MEETING MINUTES (Contact: Debbie Stewart) (Enclosure, CAC: pages 3-14; TCC: pages 15-24)
IV. ACTION ITEMS
A. REVIEW AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2017-## ADOPTING THE R2CTPO’S TITLE VI POLICY STATEMENT & COMPLAINT PROCEDURES (Contact: Pamela Blankenship) (Enclosure, pages 25-36)
B. REVIEW AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2017-## ADOPTING THE R2CTPO’S LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY (LEP) ACCESS PLAN (Contact: Pamela Blankenship) (Enclosure, pages 37-45)
C. REVIEW AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2017-## AMENDING THE FY 2016/17 TO 2020/21 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) (Contact: Robert Keeth) (Enclosure, pages 46-51)
D. REVIEW AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2017-## SUPPORTING UPDATES TO THE FLORIDA GREENWAYS AND TRAIL SYSTEM (FGTS) PLAN AND THE OPPORTUNITY AND PRIORITY MAPS (Contact: Stephan Harris) (Enclosure, pages 52-56)
1
V. PRESENTATIONS, STATUS REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION OF THE TPO’S DRAFT PRIORITY PROJECT LISTS (Contact: Robert Keeth and Stephan Harris) (Enclosure, pages 57-91)
B. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION OF THE DRAFT FY 2017/18-2021/22 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) (Contact: Robert Keeth) (Enclosure, page 92)
C. PRESENTATION AND UPDATE ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUS STOP IMPROVEMENT PLAN SCOPE OF SERVICES (Contact: Vince Wang) (Enclosure, pages 93-98)
D. FDOT REPORT (Contact: Gene Ferguson, FDOT District 5) (Enclosure, pages 99-108)
E. VOLUSIA COUNTY AND FLAGLER COUNTY CONSTRUCTION REPORTS (Contact: Volusia & Flagler County Traffic Engineering) (Enclosure, pages 109-111)
VI. STAFF COMMENTS (Enclosure, page 112)
® Update on SunRail
® Update on the I-95 to SR 417 Connector Environmental Study
VII. CAC/TCC MEMBER COMMENTS (Enclosure, page 112)
VIII. INFORMATION ITEMS (Enclosure, pages 112-117)
® April 26, 2017 River to Sea TPO Board Meeting Summary® April TPO Outreach and Events® National Trails Day Flyer
IX. ADJOURNMENT (Enclosure, page 112)
**The next CAC and TCC meetings will be on Tuesday, June 20, 2017**
Note: Individuals covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 in need of accommodations for this public meeting should contact the River to Sea TPO office, 2570 W. International Speedway Blvd., Suite 100, Daytona Beach, Florida 32114-8145; (386) 226-0422, extension 20425, at least five (5) working days prior to the meeting date.
Note: If any person decides to appeal a decision made by this board with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he/she will need a record of the proceedings including all testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. To that end, such person will want to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made.
Note: The River to Sea TPO does not discriminate in any of its programs or services. To learn more about our commitment to nondiscrimination and diversity, visit our Title VI page at www.r2ctpo.org or contact our Title VI/Nondiscrimination Coordinator, Pamela Blankenship, at 386-226-0422, extension 20416, or [email protected]. Persons who require translation services, which are provided at no cost, should contact the River to Sea TPO at (386) 226-0422 or by email at [email protected] at least five (5) business days prior to the event.
2
MEETING SUMMARY CAC & TCC
MAY 16, 2017
III. CONSENT AGENDA A. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE APRIL 18, 2017 CAC/TCC MEETING MINUTES Background Information: Minutes are prepared for each CAC and TCC meeting and said minutes must be approved by their respective committees. ACTION REQUESTED: MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA
3
Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) Meeting Minutes
April 18, 2017
CAC Members Present: Representing: Donald Smart Daytona Beach Ralph Bove DeBary Bliss Jamison Edgewater Greg Feldman, Vice Chairman Flagler County Gilles Blais Holly Hill Nora Jane Gillespie New Smyrna Beach Alan Peterson Palm Coast Bobby Ball Port Orange Bob Storke Orange City Dan D’Antonio Volusia County Chair Judy Craig, Chairperson Volusia County Patricia Lipovsky Volusia County Elizabeth Alicia Lendian Volusia County Terry Bledsoe Volusia County Edie Biro Votran (CTC) Melissa Winsett (non-voting) Volusia County Traffic Engineering Gene Ferguson (non-voting advisor) FDOT District 5 Bob Owens (non-voting) Flagler County Adam Mengel (non-voting) Flagler County Traffic Engineering CAC Members Absent: Representing: Janet Deyette (excused) Deltona Bob Owens (excused) Flagler County Transit Susan Elliott (excused) Pierson Joe Villanella (excused) Ponce Inlet Jack Delaney South Daytona Others Present: Representing: Debbie Stewart, Recording Secretary TPO Staff Pamela Blankenship TPO Staff Lois Bollenback TPO Staff Robert Keeth TPO Staff Stephan Harris TPO Staff Vince Wang TPO Staff Aarti Sharma TPO Staff Marie Kerr Citizen, New Smyrna Beach Adam Burghdoff Kittelson & Associates Mark Manwell ETM Travis Terpstra Volusia County Jon Cheney Volusia County Traffic Engineering
I. Call to Order / Roll Call / Determination of Quorum
Chairperson Craig called the meeting of the River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) to order at 1:36 p.m. The roll was called and it was determined that a quorum was present.
II. Press/Citizen Comments There were no press/citizen comments.
4
III. Consent Agenda
A. Review and Approval of March 21, 2017 CAC Meeting Minutes
MOTION: A motion was made by Ms. Gillespie to approve the March 21, 2017 CAC meeting minutes. The motion was seconded by Mr. Peterson and carried unanimously.
IV. Action Items
A. Review and Recommend Approval of Request from Volusia County to Increase Funding for the
Construction Phase of the Doyle Road Paved Shoulders Project Mr. Keeth stated this item was on the agenda last month and by request from Volusia County it was deferred because they did not have key staff in the audience to answer questions. This application is for paved shoulders on Doyle Road from Lush Lane to Courtland Boulevard for purposes of safety. In 2011, the initial cost estimate was just under $500,000 and when it was programmed for construction in June of 2015 the cost estimate had been inflated in accordance with FDOT’s standard of inflation factors to $677,000. About a year ago, Volusia County prepared a new estimate, presented that to the TPO and asked that the cost increase be funded. The cost estimate is currently $1.035 million and represents an increase of $358,000 over the programmed amount of $677,000. The cost increase is due in part to a general increase in construction costs that were higher than anticipated. There are also new items in the cost estimate that warrant attention; mobilization increased by $45,000, maintenance of traffic $45,000, clearing and grubbing increased by $90,000, excavation by $85,000, embankment by $100,000 and concrete sidewalks increased by $55,000. Volusia County is asking for approval of this request for the cost increase. He introduced Mr. Travis Terpstra, Volusia County Public Works Department, to answer any questions. Mr. Peterson commented he had opposed this item last month and was even more concerned now. Looking at the agenda on page 29, listing the itemized cost increases, mobilization and maintenance have increased 100%. Clearing and grubbing is up $90,000 when the original estimate was $10,000; so now it is $100,000. Excavation was originally $15,000 and is up $85,000; these are massive increases. The embankment and concrete sidewalks are a total of $155,000 and were not even listed on the original estimate. He appreciates that was proposed in 2011 has somewhat changed but these increases indicate that the original estimate was poorly done. The TPO policy is that any increase in cost is to be paid for by the county or the city involved. There are reasons for changes but he wants to know why there are such massive changes that will require the TPO to change its policy and procedures to allow this type of increase. Mr. Terpstra replied the county has observed that costs have gone up steadily by significant amounts over the last few years so last year during the call for projects, the county did a thorough project review of applications that had been submitted to the TPO in an attempt to update cost estimates across the board. This project had already been programmed and that means an adjustment or update cannot be done without TPO Board action. The biggest cost increase is inflation since 2011; mobilization and maintenance of traffic are considered 10% of the total. Some of the changes included conflicts between the paved shoulders with existing sidewalks which requires the sidewalks to be moved back so additional clearing and grub work is required. There is a small section of a new sidewalk to make a connection to a city park and help in a school area. Mr. Feldman commented he understands that from 2011 to 2017 the costs will go up but this is a 48% increase over the projected amount from June of 2015. It seems like a lot in just two years and he is not able to reconcile that with the explanation.
5
Mr. Terpstra replied the TPO adjusts for inflation at 3% per year so that the 2011 cost at 3% per year were probably not adequate in 2015. The funding is for 2018 so it is another three years out. Mr. Feldman commented that is still a 40% increase; he asked where the additional $358,000 would come from and if it would come from another project. Mr. Keeth replied no; this money is already on the project in FDOT’s Work Program. This action is going to bring the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) in line with what the Work Program now shows. In this case, it is the TIP that controls; if this change is not approved, the FDOT will have to amend its Work Program and remove those funds. The funds are available and ready to go. Mr. Ferguson stated the funds are on there because the funds are available. The funds did not come from any other project; the funds came from other projects that came in under budget and it helps those projects that go over budget. Mr. Feldman asked to confirm that no other project will suffer from this allocation. Mr. Keeth replied that there is not another project available to use these funds on at this time. Mr. Ferguson stated that is correct; there is not time to get another project up and ready by the end of June. Mr. D’Antonio asked if the update did not get included in the TIP because it would have required a TIP amendment since the project was already programmed when the county came with the cost update last year. Mr. Keeth replied it was programmed at his request; it had not been approved by the TPO. It was his error in requesting that it get programmed. Mr. D’Antonio asked what the benefit was of adding paved shoulders and if sidewalks were being added where there were none. Mr. Terpstra replied safety and adding sidewalks. MOTION: A motion was made by Mr. D’Antonio to recommend approval of the request from Volusia
County to increase funding for the construction phase of the Doyle Road paved shoulders project. The motion was seconded by Mr. Ball.
Mr. Bove asked when the project was scheduled to go to construction. Mr. Keeth replied 2018. Mr. Bove asked what will happen when the construction bids come in higher or lower than the actual construction cost. Mr. Terpstra replied that is why the county looked at all the current projects on the list with the TPO during the call for projects last year; to update cost estimates to be more in line with what the actual cost might be. The county does not anticipate coming back for more funding. Mr. Bove asked if in the county’s cost estimate process, they accounted for unknowns, contingencies or factors that alleviate these issues. Mr. Terpstra replied yes, in the initial stages cost estimates should be more conservative to allow for those types of contingencies.
6
Mr. Ferguson stated FDOT does not allow for explicit funding of contingencies but does have to allow for inflation. For FDOT’s projects, the inflation annual increase is 20%, so a two year inflation would be a 40% increase. Ms. Bledsoe asked if the county had the $358,000 available. Mr. Terpstra replied no, not for this project; it is not budgeted. Ms. Bledsoe asked how the county reconciled the TPO’s resolution that states that whoever is promoting the project has to pay for the cost overruns. Mr. Terpstra replied that is why the county looked at all the cost estimates again to get updated costs. Chairperson Craig commented this project, and especially the sidewalks are for safety reasons. Children are walking to school and to a park. Doyle Road is an extremely unsafe road to be on; there are entrances to I-4 and a lot of another things going on. To be able to have the children walk in safety is extremely important. Mr. Peterson asked if the available funds were not used by June 30 would they be lost. Mr. Ferguson replied the funds are added to the Work Program now; if FDOT released them now the funds could be used elsewhere and this project could suffer. If county does not have the funds to pursue the project in 2018 all of that money goes back to the FDOT and that would mean the TPO would have to find a lot of projects that would all have to be delivered in 2018. Most agencies require at least a year for design. Mr. Peterson asked if the funds were not lost could they be redistributed during 2017/18 to other projects if the TPO so decides. Mr. Ferguson replied that is speculative; this project is ready and it seems a shame to lose that. Mr. Feldman asked for clarification that these funds are coming from FDOT, it is encumbered by FDOT for the project and the TPO is basically amending its plan for the year to include this money. Mr. Ferguson replied that is correct; the TPO does have explicit control over the money and that is what this is all about. Mr. Feldman asked again for confirmation that no project would suffer if this is approved. He is not questioning the merits of the project, just the funding. Ms. Gillespie stated if the project was submitted in 2011 for 2018, did the county make a mistake and how this got missed last year. Mr. Terpstra replied the county did catch it last year; the project was submitted in March 2016 during the call for projects. Due to the TPO’s processes, it was not able to be incorporated last year because funding had been allocated a few months prior. Ms. Gillespie asked if it was because it was too close to the other money received. Mr. Keeth replied once a project is programmed the funds can only be amended through the TPO review. The TPO could not adjust the amount on that project when the revised estimate was submitted last year because the project had already been programmed and it required it be moved through this review. Mr. Ferguson stated this is the reason things got locked down last year. The way the federal government looks at the use of their funds is it is either needed or it is not needed; and if it is not needed, they will take
7
it away and give it to an area that does need it. Needing it means it has been assigned to a project and not needing it means it is sitting in a funding reserve box. That had been the pattern here, only programming out a couple of years which does allow some flexibility but makes it look like the funds are not needed. FDOT has begun to correct this through the TPO and had been programming farther out; the federal government wants projects programmed four years out and the state prefers five years out. Circumstances are that costs are going up and are going to require additional funds. Eventually, projects will be programmed five years before the funds are used. FDOT will try to build in inflation factors, but when inflation soars on transportation projects, like it is now, it is hard to project the cost. The economy could take a downward turn and then all the estimates would be high. Ms. Bledsoe commented as a discussion item, that in the 2016 resolution regarding cost overruns, the word “shall” is used and “shall” means they should pay for it themselves. There are twenty different political subdivisions and each come for more money. She suggested an amendment to the motion to change the language to “may” instead of “shall”. Mr. Keeth replied the policy does need to be reconsidered. It is very difficult to project costs several years in advance. It is customary for a project sponsor to review projects periodically. Projects are often programmed years before construction occurs and once they are programmed the policy kicks in and allows no flexibility other than this amendment process. It does need to be revisited, to find a better way while holding the project applicants accountable to some degree. Chairperson Craig introduced new CAC member Ms. Patricia Lipovsky, appointed by Volusia County Council Member Billie Wheeler. Ms. Lipovsky asked what would happen to the leftover money if the county was allowed the extra funding and it was not all used. Mr. Keeth replied this is a reimbursable fund program. FDOT will pay the bill when the project sponsor submits the bill; no money is advanced so there is no money to return.
A hand count vote was taken with nine approving the motion and four opposing. The motion carried.
B. Review and Recommend Approval of Request from South Daytona to Increase Funding for the
Construction Phase of the Big Tree Road Shared Use Path Mr. Harris stated this project was recommended in the Bicycle and Pedestrian School Safety Study for South Daytona in 2009 with a cost estimate of $500,000. In 2011, the city applied for construction funding for that amount. The city had already undertaken the design and requested $500,000 for construction and that was the amount programmed. The city is asking for additional funds because of a more recent cost estimate date March 31, 2017. The current construction cost estimate is $607,000 which represents inflation and unforeseen costs such as replacing a pedestrian signal, extending pedestrian railing and for crosswalk improvements. The TPO does have the policy addressing cost overruns and the resolution containing that policy is included in the agenda. Chairperson Craig asked what the LAP funds are. Mr. Harris replied LAP funds are Local Agency Program funds. The federal funds that the TPO has allocated to this project are $500,000; there are additional local funds on this project because the city is required to provide a 10% match. Those are not included; the $500,000 is federal funds. The additional amount the city is asking for is in federal or state funds from the TPO. Ms. Lipovsky asked what part of Big Tree Road this construction would be and what it would cover.
8
Mr. Harris replied in addition to inflation it would cover additional work such as replacing a pedestrian signal, extending pedestrian railings and patterned pavement in a crosswalk along the shopping center. This shared use path runs from Nova Road to east of Segrave Street; those are the project limits. Chairperson Craig commented this is from the Bicycle and Pedestrian School Safety Study and is for the South Daytona Elementary School. Big Tree Road is a busy road and safety issues need attention. Ms. Lipovsky asked if this would be done on both sides of the road. Mr. Harris replied only on the south side. Mr. Peterson asked where the federal funds were coming from and what they were originally earmarked for. Mr. Harris replied these would be Advanced Construction (ACSU) funds. Mr. Peterson replied no, they are asking federal funds of $107,000 and he asked where those funds are allocated now. Mr. Harris replied the funds are not allocated to any given project right now; the TPO receives a certain amount of ACSU funds each year. They are not on any given project until the TPO allocates them. Mr. Peterson asked if there was a project design with no change, why the original estimate did not include the replacement of the pedestrian signal and extended railing. He thinks this is an error in the original cost and should not be approved at this point. This money is coming out of reserves that could be used for other projects. This is another item in conflict with TPO policy. Mr. Feldman asked how long the shared use path is. Mr. Harris replied the path is approximately 5,000 feet. Ms. Lipovsky asked if the pedestrian signal was going to be replaced with an accessible pedestrian signal (APS). Mr. Harris replied he cannot answer on behalf of the city. The BPAC approved this funding request last week but there was extensive discussion as to the desirability of an APS signal. The BPAC thought it was a worthy addition to this project but the funding was approved without it. It is not in the current scope; the city would have to revise the design, as the current plans do not call for it to be included. Ms. Bledsoe asked if there was a length of time that a project remains on the list to be funded before it is withdrawn and the money reallocated. Mr. Keeth replied if a project is not programmed within three years due to the fault of the applicant, the project is removed. Ms. Bledsoe asked if this project started in 2009, submitted in 2011 and it is now 2017, if that fit in that particular regulation. Mr. Keeth replied if it was not programmed due to the responsibilities of the project applicant, yes, it should be removed, but that is not case here. Mr. Harris stated it was programmed in 2011; the programming is in the current year, fiscal year (FY) 2017. It was put in the Work Program several years ago.
9
Ms. Gillespie stated the city has a lot of drainage built into this project, and these things are city enterprise funded projects and they should pay for that. The normal maintenance expenses should be removed and the amount of money needed would not be as much. MOTION: A motion was made by Mr. Storke to recommend approval of the request from South
Daytona to increase funding for the construction phase of the Big Tree Road shared use path. The motion was seconded by Mr. Bove. A hand count vote was taken with nine approving and five opposing. The motion carried.
V. Presentation Items
A. Presentation and Discussion of the R2CTPO’s Draft Title VI and Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Plans
Ms. Blankenship stated the TPO is updating its Title VI and Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Plans and that it had been two years since they were last updated. Title VI provides that the TPO cannot discriminate on the basis of race, color or national origin; there are other Titles that cover age, disability and other items. She reviewed the changes and additions to the Title VI Plan. Ms. Blankenship stated the LEP requires that the TPO take reasonable steps to ensure meaningful access to the TPO’s programs, services and activities to those that do not speak English well. She reviewed the changes and additions. These draft plans area available for review and comment for the next 30 days and will be adopted next month. Mr. Peterson asked if the TPO Survey has to be provided in Spanish. Ms. Blankenship replied the TPO does not have to, but chooses to. Mr. Peterson stated he was a strong proponent that anyone living in this country should learn English. He asked how much it cost the TPO to print the survey in Spanish instead of inserting a line stating that it could be provided if necessary. Ms. Blankenship replied she was not sure and introduced Mr. Adam Burghdoff, Kittelson and Associates, to answer as he is the consultant that works on the survey with the TPO. Mr. Burghdoff replied he did not have the exact specifics; the website that was developed for the survey was developed in English and Spanish. There were very few printed surveys disseminated and filled out and returned. The printed surveys were printed on the TPO’s copier in black and white. Ms. Blankenship replied the copies are $0.06 per black and white copy. Mr. Feldman asked if LEP was a federal mandate. Ms. Blankenship replied yes.
B. Presentation and Discussion of Updates to the Florida Greenways and Trail System (FGTS) Plan and the
Opportunity and Priority Maps Mr. Harris gave a PowerPoint presentation and stated the Florida Greenways and Trails System (FGTS) is the statewide trail system with many types of trails. The plan is the vision for implementing a connected system of these trails. The plan was created in 1998 and authorized by the Florida Legislature in 1999. The existing plan and priority maps were last updated in 2012, the opportunity maps in 2015 and they are in the current update cycle for the next plan for 2018-2022. He showed the land trail opportunity and priority corridor maps. The TPO is concerned with the land trail maps; federal funds only allow the TPO to fund paved land trails. The opportunity portions of these land trails are existing, planned and conceptual trails that are part of the statewide system. The priority trails are the most important within the
10
opportunity maps. There are four corridors proposed to be updated; two going north-south and two going east/west. The north/south corridors are the Bunnell to Ormond Corridor (US 1 Trail) and the Palm Coast to Bulow Corridor (the Graham Swamp Trail) and are being proposed to be extended as far north as possible within the planning area and elevated to priority. The east/west corridors are the SR 40 Trail Corridor and the Cross Volusia Trail Corridor and are being proposed to be elevated to priority with the same limits and no extensions. Chairperson Craig asked if this item would be back for approval. Mr. Harris replied yes, next month. Mr. Bove commented that trails are like roads and are multi-jurisdictional and asked if the TPO was coordinating with St. Johns County to understand what their master plan is or is not. He asked if anything was planned in the neighboring jurisdiction where the TPO’s boundary ends. Mr. Harris replied he was not sure of the trail plans in St. John’s County. The TPO has coordinated with Flagler County, Palm Coast and Volusia County because those are the jurisdictions responsible for building and maintaining the trails. Mr. Peterson asked if the trails were paved and able to be used for walking and biking. Mr. Harris replied yes, they are all paved facilities.
C. Presentation and Discussion of Pedestrian Crash Statistics
Mr. Harris gave a PowerPoint presentation on pedestrian safety. He covered the five “Es” of safety; education, encouragement, engineering, enforcement and evaluation, and stated the TPO incorporates these in its overall safety program. He explained that consultants such as Kittleson & Associates assist with engineering, the TPO partners with law enforcement on enforcement, and covers the education and encouragement at different helmet fitting events throughout the year. He went over the national statistics on pedestrian safety and fatalities, state statistics and local statistics. The Daytona Beach-Deltona-Ormond Beach area ranked number five in the Dangerous by Design Report from 2016. The TPO sets aside 30% of its annual funding for bicycle and pedestrian projects and $100,000 for bicycle and pedestrian feasibility studies. In addition to that, the TPO sets aside monies from the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) for local initiatives. The TPO participates in at least a dozen events a year to encourage and educate on bicycle and pedestrian safety. He went over the pedestrian plans and the feasibility studies recently completed, public awareness efforts and pedestrian safety best practices. Mr. Peterson asked if the correlation between alcohol and pedestrian fatalities referred to the driver or the pedestrian. Mr. Harris replied it could be both. Mr. Peterson asked if the data used clarified if it was the driver, pedestrian or both. Mr. Harris said no; the crash reports would have to be drilled down more in detail. Mr. Peterson stated he understands emphasizing road safety but if there is a major problem with pedestrians not following the rules and regulations or being impaired in some manner, we could be looking at the wrong solution to the problem. Mr. Harris replied when alcohol is involved it could be a drunk driver, a drunk pedestrian or a combination of both.
11
Mr. Ferguson stated that the identification of US 1 as being the most dangerous corridor for pedestrians was just mirrored in the Ft. Lauderdale area. The report did not say where on US 1 so it could be widespread from there to here. It may be worth taking a closer look at.
D. Presentation and Discussion of Project Applications Received from the Annual Call for Projects (Handout provided) Mr. Keeth stated the TPO just concluded the annual call for projects on March 31, 2017 and received 50 project applications. The call for projects is the process used to identify many of the transportation projects funded through the TPO. This process focuses on traffic operations and safety projects, bicycle/ pedestrian projects, transportation enhancement projects and transportation planning studies. It does not include transportation capacity projects such as new roadways or lane additions; those are identified and ranked through the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and moved to the priority project list. The project applications received were about equally divided between traffic operations and safety projects and bicycle/pedestrian projects, with 22 and 23 received respectively. Within those categories the TPO received equal numbers of applications for feasibility studies and project implementations. Of the applications received, 42 were from Volusia County and 8 from Flagler County which is the exact same number of applications per capita. There was also a good distribution from city to city; 14 cities submitted applications. These project applications will be reviewed by the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Subcommittee, which will focus on the traffic operations and safety projects and transportation planning studies, and the BPAC Project Review Subcommittee, which will review the bicycle and pedestrian projects. These two subcommittees will meet this week to begin the evaluation and ranking of the projects. In the course of that review, the subcommittees will be screening the projects to ensure they all are eligible and have fully complied with the application requirements. There are a few projects that have raised red flags for the TPO and the subcommittees will be asked to look at those in particular. He briefly covered a couple of red flag projects; the Nova Road widening project, a Saul Street traffic calming island and the East International Speedway Boulevard (ISB) Corridor Improvement project. The TPO is pleased with the range of projects received and many of these were identified in the corridor studies and other studies the TPO has done. This is a great opportunity for project costs and other information to be updated and he encouraged anyone that had a special interest in any of these projects to attend the meetings. Mr. Blais asked if the East International Speedway Boulevard (ISB) beachside corridor project was one way street to redo the traffic or do away with the beach toll booth. Mr. Keeth replied no, the project limits are from the river to the beach and involves the installation of a median barrier to limit left hand turn movements and possibly involving a roundabout at SR A1A and US 92. It also includes bicycle and pedestrian improvements as well. The city submitted this as a traffic operations/safety project and as a bicycle/pedestrian project. Mr. Blais asked how many dollars it involved. Mr. Keeth replied it is a multi-million dollar project.
E. Presentation and Discussion of the Flagler Bicycle & Pedestrian School Safety Review Studies (Part 2) Mr. Adam Burghdoff, Kittelson & Associates, gave a PowerPoint presentation update on the Flagler Bicycle and Pedestrian School Safety Review Studies and stated there were seven schools in the study. The four schools in part 2 are Wadsworth Elementary, Buddy Taylor Middle School, Old Kings Elementary and Bunnell Elementary. Reports of the studies have been distributed to the stakeholders; the cities and Flagler County, FDOT and the school staff. The schools studied in 2016 were Belle Terre Elementary, Indian Trails Middle School, which are co-located school sites and Rymfire Elementary. Wadsworth Elementary and Buddy Taylor Middle School are also co-located school sites and it was noted that the park located on the east side was creating friction with the school circulation with arrival and dismissal periods. A lot of the
12
issues observed around these all seven sites are related to parent pick-up and drop off; queuing on site, parents not wanting to wait through the serpentine snake so they are dropping students off on the side of the road that is creating conflict points where there are crosswalks and driveways. Some improvements identified that can potentially offset some of these issues are programmatic in nature such as encouraging walking/biking to school, car pooling and educating parents. The low volume roadways in smaller neighborhoods have been identified; there is new technology and new research underway that considers giving part of the road to the non-motorist called an advisory shoulder. There was an article published by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) regarding this and FHWA is looking for pilot programs and there could be research dollars available if an agency is willing to implement something like this. It does not exist in Florida, but might be worth considering because it could be cost advantageous rather than sidewalks. He is sure the TPO would be willing to work with an agency that may be considering implementing something like this.
F. Presentation and Discussion of Resiliency to Sea Level Rise, Storm Surge and Coastal Flooding
Mr. Harris stated that last year the TPO adopted a Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment Study which included a tool used to model sea level rise. The TPO had a workshop with local stakeholders to train them on using this tool. This is the second phase of that study; to take sea level rise and put storm surge and coastal flooding elements on top of it. This year there are new impact areas as a result of the 100 year storm coastal flooding events and storm surge that was also modeled. Implementation strategies were also identified. He went over evacuation routes, critical facilities, transportation facilities, public works facilities and shelters. The two models of the phase are Coastal Flood Hazards model which FEMA uses to develop their flood insurance rate maps and relies on the 100 year still water elevation and still water depth to identify impacts of storm surge. The second model is the Coastal Surge model where storm surge and wave modeling is used to develop an estimate for wind and flood losses for a single hurricane event. He went over the sea level rise impacts with coastal flooding and the three target years of 2040, 2070 and 2100. He reviewed the financial exposure and some of the losses caused from sea level rise with coastal flooding could reach over $11 billion. There is a low, intermediate and high level curve. An analysis was done of Hurricane Dora, the last category 3 hurricane to make landfall in 1964 that was used as a model. Hurricane Matthew came close enough but was so recent the data was not available. The next step is to adopt the report and develop a resiliency action plan and incorporate that into TPO documents. Chairperson Craig suggested putting this on the agenda for next month as a discussion item due to a lack of time.
G. FDOT Report
Mr. Ferguson gave the FDOT report and gave details of various projects.
H. Volusia and Flagler County Construction Reports
Ms. Winsett gave the Volusia County Construction Report; there was no Flagler County Construction Report.
VI. Staff Comments ® Update on SunRail
There was no update.
® Update on SR A1A Stabilization There was no update.
® Update on the I-95 to SR 417 Connector Environmental Study
13
There was no update.
® Update on development of the new FY 2017/18- FY 2021/22 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Mr. Keeth announced the deadline for the opportunity to comment on the scope of work for Votran’s Bus Stop Improvement Plan is April 28, 2017.
VII. CAC Member Comments
There were no member comments.
VIII. Information Items
® March 22, 2017 River to Sea TPO Board Meeting Summary ® March TPO Outreach and Events ® Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Public Meeting Notice
IX. Adjournment There being no further business, the CAC meeting adjourned at 3:04 p.m.
RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION
_______________________________________ JUDY CRAIG, CHAIRPERSON
CITIZENS’ ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC) CERTIFICATE: The undersigned duly qualified and acting Recording Secretary of the River to Sea TPO certified that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the minutes of the April 18, 2017 regular meeting of the Citizens’ Advisory Committee (CAC), approved and duly signed this 16th day of May 2017. ______________________________________ DEBBIE STEWART, RECORDING SECRETARY RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION
14
Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC)
Meeting Minutes
April 18, 2017
TCC Members Present: Representing: Fred Griffith Bunnell Fred Ferrell Daytona Beach Mike Holmes DeLand Ron Paradise Deltona Darren Lear Edgewater Larry Newsom Flagler Beach Tom Harowski Holly Hill Becky Mendez Orange City Ric Goss, Vice Chairman Ormond Beach Jose Papa Palm Coast Mark Karet Pierson Aref Joulani Ponce Inlet Tim Burman, Chairman Port Orange John Dillard South Daytona Jon Cheney V.C. Traffic Engineering Eric Kozielski Volusia County School District Heather Blanck Votran Gene Ferguson (non-voting advisor) FDOT District 5
TCC Members Absent: Representing: Stewart Cruz Daytona Beach Shores Arlene Smith Daytona Beach Int’l Airport Matt Boerger DeBary Faith Alkhatib F.C. Traffic Engineering Jason Yarborough Lake Helen Amye King (excused) New Smyrna Beach Larry LaHue V.C. Emergency Management Others Present: Representing: Debbie Stewart, Recording Secretary TPO Staff Robert Keeth TPO Staff Pamela Blankenship TPO Staff Lois Bollenback TPO Staff Stephan Harris TPO Staff Vince Wang TPO Staff Aarti Sharma TPO Staff Rich Walton Daytona Beach Auba Joseph DeLand Heather Roberts Kimley-Horn Lisa Buscher FDOT Jason Klempin FDOT Jake Baker Ponce Inlet Heather Roberts Kimley-Horn Mark Manwell ETM Andrea Ostrodka Lochner Travis Terspstra Volusia County Traffic Engineering
15
I. Call to Order / Roll Call / Determination of Quorum
Chairman Tim Burman called the meeting of the River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC) to order at 3:12 p.m. The roll was called and it was determined that a quorum was present.
II. Press/Citizen Comments There were no press/citizen comments.
III. Consent Agenda A. Review and Approval of March 21, 2017 TCC Meeting Minutes
MOTION: A motion was made by Mr. Lear to approve the March 21, 2017 TCC meeting minutes. The
motion was seconded by Mr. Cheney and carried unanimously.
IV. Action Items
A. Review and Recommend Approval of Request from Volusia County to Increase Funding for the Construction Phase of the Doyle Road Paved Shoulders Project Mr. Keeth stated this item was on the agenda last month and by request from Volusia County it was deferred because they did not have key staff in the audience to answer questions. This application is for paved shoulders on Doyle Road from Lush Lane to Courtland Boulevard for purposes of safety. In 2011 the initial cost estimate was just under $500,000 and when it was programmed for construction in June of 2015 the cost estimate had been inflated in accordance with FDOT’s standard of inflation factors to $677,000. About a year ago, Volusia County prepared a new estimate, presented that to the TPO and asked that the cost increase be funded. The cost estimate is currently $1.35 million and represents an increase of $358,000 over the programmed amount of $677,000. The cost increase is due in part to a general increase in construction costs higher than anticipated. There are also new items in the cost estimate that warrant attention: mobilization increased by $45,000, maintenance of traffic $45,000, clearing and grubbing increased by $90,000, excavation by $85,000, embankment by $100,000 and concrete sidewalks increased by $55,000. Volusia County is asking for approval of this request for the cost increase. Mr. Cheney stated since the project is already programmed, Mr. Ferguson will speak on additional information pertinent to this worthy project. He then introduced new Volusia County engineer, Mr. Travis Terpstra, who will answer any questions. Mr. Ferguson stated this project was added to FDOT’s Work Program last year during the application of the Advanced Construction (ACSU) funds. The reason it is important to program these funds is because FDOT has a target that has to be met. If the target is met, agencies can go above the minimum. The TPO worked with FDOT to identify projects that were known to need additional funds and applied the funds to those projects, as well as any new projects that could realistically be advanced within that time frame. All of that was done last fall. Mr. Terpstra replied the county has observed that costs have steadily gone up by significant amounts over the last few years so last year during the call for projects, the county did a thorough project review of applications that had been submitted to the TPO in an attempt to update cost estimates across the board. This project had already been programmed, which means an adjustment or update cannot be done without TPO Board action.
16
Mr. Ferrell asked if the project was 100% funded. Mr. Ferguson replied yes. Mr. Paradise asked if the cost estimates were Volusia County’s estimates based on recent bid activity and not actual bids that have come in for the project. Mr. Terpstra replied the county uses a variety of sources to compare estimates; mainly FDOT. It also uses county bid projects that have come in to make comparisons. Mr. Paradise asked if the funds used were ACSU funds. Mr. Ferguson replied yes. Mr. Paradise asked how much was available in the ACSU fund. Mr. Ferguson replied it is inaccurate to talk about as a fixed sum; it is a budgeted amount that is assigned to FDOT. As money ebbs and flows through FDOT, it grows and shrinks over time. No one has informed him that it is running low and since it is close to the end of the fiscal year, that suggests there is more available. Mr. Paradise stated he is not adverse to cost overruns and thinks this is a worthy project for a number of reasons. He asked how sustainable this rush for funds is to address all these overruns and commented he would like to have the opportunity to take advantage of it. He wonders which local governments will request more money before it is gone. Mr. Cheney stated everyone knows that bids are coming in higher because of this project and others like it. Back in November, he asked when the county could submit revised cost estimates and the answer was they could be submitted at any time, they did not have to wait for the call for projects. This information was given to the Engineering and Construction Department so when they did their internal review, updates would get out in a more timely manner. There used to be an internal mechanism called an intake meeting within FDOT after the design to review the cost estimates to make sure they were accurate. FDOT no longer does this. He has spoken to Ms. Bollenback about asking for those intake meetings to occur when they have partnership meetings to have a better feel of the true cost. The county is working to resolve the issue. The mega projects in Orlando are sapping everyone’s bids. Regarding the Turnbull Bay Bridge project, the county was fortunate to receive the extra funds and was able to value engineer to reduce the cost and give some of the money back to the TPO. Mr. Paradise stated it is well understood that the price structure is rapidly evolving northward and asked what happens when the bids come in substantially higher than the latest estimate and what the contingency is for that. Mr. Cheney replied there could be a possibility of scaling back the scope of the project and not doing as much, especially with a paved shoulder project. Instead of going from Providence to Kirkland, it could go from Providence to Saxon Boulevard; change the project limits for what money is available and then submit for another project. Mr. Paradise asked if the policy allows a local government to come back and ask again for augmented funds based on the actual bids that come in. Mr. Keeth replied it happened with the bridge and the US 92 project. Mr. Cheney commented it happened for Volusia County on Kepler Road and SR 44; nothing worked so the county pulled the project and asked FDOT to re-allocate the money. Now the county is back submitting a project on behalf of FDOT to reevaluate that intersection to see what solution is technically feasible.
17
Ms. Bollenback stated the ACSU funding is funding that FDOT puts on projects and by moving projects forward and guaranteeing funding, FDOT can take advantage of funds in other areas that have not been obligated. If another area in the state does not obligate all their funding, it becomes available for FDOT to use on sound projects that are ready to go. FDOT fronts this ACSU funding and then replenishes it. Last year, after looking at years of data, the state decided they could do as much as 70% of the regular SU set aside funding. On top of the $5 million the TPO normally receives each year, the ACSU was increased to $7 million. The TPO was asked to find $3-5 million of additional projects. It will last as long as it lasts, but it takes the opportunity to shift funding from the local level to the federal level. It eventually will hit the ceiling but at this point the TPO is at the end of the fiscal year. The opportunity to fund good projects with available federal funds is a good opportunity. Projects do drop out; projects run into problems and have to drop off the list. This keeps the TPO’s obligating authority above the threshold, so if a project does drop out the TPO does not lose obligating authority for the following year. These are great financial mechanisms that FDOT has put in place and the TPO wants to take advantage of it.
MOTION: A motion was made by Mr. Ferrell to recommend of approval of the request from Volusia
County to increase funding for the construction phase of the Doyle Road paved shoulders project. The motion was seconded by Mr. Cheney and carried unanimously.
B. Review and Recommend Approval of Request from South Daytona to Increase Funding for the
Construction Phase of the Big Tree Road Shared Use Path
Mr. Harris stated this project was recommended in the Bicycle and Pedestrian School Safety Study for South Daytona in 2009 with a cost estimate of $500,000. In 2011, the city applied for construction funding for that amount. The city had already undertaken the design and requested $500,000 for construction and that was the amount programmed. The city is asking for additional funds because of a more recent cost estimate dated March 31, 2017. The current construction cost estimate is $607,000 which represents inflation and unforeseen costs such as replacing a pedestrian signal, extending pedestrian railing and for crosswalk improvements. The TPO does have a policy addressing cost overruns and the resolution containing that policy is included in the agenda. Mr. Cheney commented Volusia County was one of the participants that reviewed the plans and asked for some of the unforeseen work to be done. MOTION: A motion was made by Mr. Cheney to recommend approval of request from South Daytona
to increase funding for the construction phase of the Big Tree Road shared use path. The motion was seconded by Mr. Ferrell and carried unanimously.
V. Presentation Items
A. Presentation and Discussion of the R2CTPO’s Draft Title VI and Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Plans
Ms. Blankenship stated the TPO is updating its Title VI and Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Plans and that it had been two years since they were last updated. Title VI provides that the TPO cannot discriminate on the basis of race, color or national origin; there are other Titles that cover age, disability and other items. She reviewed the changes and additions to the Title VI Plan. Ms. Blankenship stated the LEP requires that the TPO take reasonable steps to ensure meaningful access to the TPO’s programs, services and activities to those that do not speak English well. She reviewed the changes and additions. These draft plans are available for review and comment for the next 30 days and they will be adopted next month.
B. Presentation and Discussion of Updates to the Florida Greenways and Trail System (FGTS) Plan and the
Opportunity and Priority Maps
18
Mr. Harris gave a PowerPoint presentation and stated the Florida Greenways and Trails System (FGTS) is the statewide trail system with many types of trails. The plan is the vision for implementing a connected system of these trails. The plan was created in 1998 and authorized by the Florida Legislature in 1999. The existing plan and priority maps were last updated in 2012, the opportunity maps in 2015, and they are in the current update cycle for the next plan for 2018-2022. He showed the land trail opportunity and priority corridor maps. The TPO is concerned with the land trail maps; federal funds only allow the TPO to fund paved land trails. The opportunity portions of these land trails are existing, planned and conceptual trails that are part of the statewide system. The priority trails are the most important within the opportunity maps. There are four corridors proposed to be updated; two going north-south and two going east/west. The north/south corridors are the Bunnell to Ormond Corridor (US 1 Trail) and the Palm Coast to Bulow Corridor (the Graham Swamp Trail) and are being proposed to be extended as far north as possible within the planning area and elevated to priority. The east/west corridors are the SR 40 Trail Corridor and the Cross Volusia Trail Corridor and are being proposed to be elevated to be priority with the same limits and no extensions. Mr. Karet asked what the impact was of making this a priority. Mr. Harris replied the hope is to put it in line for state funding, particularly for SunTrail funding. Mr. Ferguson commented that Flagler County received funding for the Grand Swamp Trail that connects to the Lehigh Trail and that design should be starting in a year or two.
C. Presentation and Discussion of Pedestrian Crash Statistics
Mr. Harris gave a PowerPoint presentation on pedestrian safety. He covered the five “Es” of safety; education, encouragement, engineering, enforcement and evaluation, and stated the TPO incorporates these in its overall safety program. He explained that consultants such as Kittleson & Associates assist with engineering, the TPO partners with law enforcement on enforcement, and covers the education and encouragement at different helmet fitting events throughout the year. He went over the national statistics on pedestrian safety and fatalities, state statistics and local statistics. The Daytona Beach-Deltona-Ormond Beach area ranked number five in the Dangerous by Design Report from 2016. The TPO sets aside 30% of its annual funding for bicycle and pedestrian projects and $100,000 for bicycle and pedestrian feasibility studies. In addition to that, the TPO sets aside monies from the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) for local initiatives. The TPO participates in at least a dozen events a year to encourage and educate on bicycle and pedestrian safety. He went over the pedestrian plans and the feasibility studies recently completed, public awareness efforts and pedestrian safety best practices.
Mr. Cheney asked if the TPO had not just approved several projects for lights on state roads. Mr. Keeth replied yes. Mr. Cheney commented that maybe the focus was on the wrong problem or wrong location. Mr. Harris stated the time and day of the crashes correlate to the high fatalities at night. He reviewed more evidence that pedestrian fatalities occur overwhelming at night. Mr. Cheney asked if this data also correlates to intoxication. Mr. Harris replied that yes, alcohol involvement is a factor in about half; drunk driving, drunk walking or both. Mr. Cheney commented that most bars close at 2:00 am. Mr. Harris replied that the hours between midnight and 6:00 am are also a problem. He reviewed local statistics on pedestrian fatalities and the roadways associated with them.
19
Mr. Cheney referred to the table of local statistics and asked if the TPO could develop its own index as a comparison to the Dangerous by Design Report for each of the local jurisdictions. He also asked what data was not applicable and if it was the unincorporated part of the county. Mr. Harris replied the unincorporated areas of Volusia County are not applicable. Mr. Cheney asked if when pulling the statistics did the study account for and remove parking lots, private roads and driveways. Mr. Harris replied no, these statistics come straight from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) as is. The TPO did not make any modifications. He continued to review the statistics. Mr. Ferguson stated the lighting bundles FDOT did partially involve pedestrians as well as vehicles as part of the safety program and it was where crashes were happening at night. These were highway safety program funds and required a cost benefit ratio of 2:1.
D. Presentation and Discussion of Project Applications Received from the Annual Call for Projects
(Handout provided) Mr. Keeth stated the TPO just concluded the annual call for projects on March 31, 2017 and received 50 project applications. The call for projects is the process used to identify many of the transportation projects funded through the TPO. This process focuses on traffic operations and safety projects, bicycle/ pedestrian projects, transportation enhancement projects and transportation planning studies. It does not include transportation capacity projects such as new roadways or lane additions; those are identified and ranked through the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and moved to the priority project list. The project applications received were about equally divided between traffic operations and safety projects and bicycle/pedestrian projects, with 22 and 23 received respectively. Within those categories the TPO received equal numbers of applications for feasibility studies and project implementations. Of the applications received, 42 were from Volusia County and 8 from Flagler County which is the exact same number of applications per capita. There was also a good distribution from city to city; 14 cities submitted applications. These project applications will be reviewed by the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Subcommittee which will focus on the traffic operations and safety projects and transportation planning studies and the BPAC Project Review Subcommittee will review the bicycle and pedestrian projects. These two subcommittees will meet this week to begin the evaluation and ranking of the projects. In the course of that review, the subcommittees will be screening the projects to ensure they all are eligible and have fully complied with the application requirements. There are a few projects that have raised red flags for the TPO and the subcommittees will be asked to look at those in particular. He briefly covered a couple of red flag projects; the Nova Road widening project, a Saul Street traffic calming island and the East International Speedway Boulevard (ISB) Corridor Improvement project. The TPO is pleased with the range of projects received and many of these were identified in the corridor studies and other studies the TPO has done. He reminded the committee that the project applications received during the call for projects will be added to the priority project list in accordance with the scores that are applied. This is a great opportunity for project costs and other information to be updated and he encouraged anyone that had a special interest in any of these projects to attend the subcommittee meetings. Mr. Holmes asked if the order of projects listed would be the order they would be reviewed at the meeting. Mr. Keeth replied it was up to the committees to decide that; they are listed in alphabetical order. Mr. Cheney asked if the project applications were available online. Mr. Keeth replied yes and an email notice was sent to the subcommittee members with the link in it. He stated he would send the link to anyone who requests it.
E. Presentation and Discussion of the Flagler Bicycle & Pedestrian School Safety Review Studies (Part 2)
20
Mr. Adam Burghdoff, Kittelson & Associates, gave a PowerPoint presentation update on the Flagler Bicycle and Pedestrian School Safety Review Studies and stated there were seven schools in the study. The four schools in part 2 are Wadsworth Elementary, Buddy Taylor Middle School, Old Kings Elementary and Bunnell Elementary. Reports of the studies have been distributed to the stakeholders; the cities and Flagler County, FDOT and the school staff. The schools studied in 2016 were Belle Terre Elementary, Indian Trails Middle School, which are co-located school sites and Rymfire Elementary. Wadsworth Elementary and Buddy Taylor Middle School are also co-located school sites and it was noted that the park located on the east side was creating friction with the school circulation with arrival and dismissal periods. A lot of the issues observed around these all seven sites are related to parent pick-up and drop off; queuing on site, parents not wanting to wait through the serpentine snake so they are dropping students off on the side of the road that is creating conflict points where there are crosswalks and driveways. Some improvements identified that can potentially offset some of these issues are programmatic in nature such as encouraging walking/biking to school, car pooling and educating parents. The low volume roadways in smaller neighborhoods have been identified; there is new technology and new research underway that considers giving part of the road to the non-motorist called an advisory shoulder. There was an article published by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) regarding this and FHWA is looking for pilot programs and there could be research dollars available if an agency is willing to implement something like this. It does not exist in Florida, but might be worth considering because it could be cost advantageous rather than sidewalks. He is sure the TPO would be willing to work with an agency that may be considering implementing something like this.
Mr. Harowski referred to the parent drop off/pick-up issues and asked if there was any information on if the students were walking or biking or if it was parents trying to avoid the bus. Mr. Burghdoff replied there is; parallel to this study, two surveys from the Federal Safe Routes to School Program were sent out. One survey was a teacher disseminated survey where the teacher took a show of hands as to how many students were walking, biking, riding the bus or parent drop off. The other survey was completed online by the parents that had more detail as to the locations. The results of those surveys have not been received yet; the federal government is processing them. Bus service is not provided within the walk zones depicted on the maps. State law states that bus service does not need to be provided within two miles of a school; Flagler County has the ability to provide for their elementary schools within one mile. Mr. Harowski commented that Flagler County is a full choice district so parents driving students to a school may not live in that district. Mr. Burghdoff replied that issue has been discussed.
F. Presentation and Discussion of Resiliency to Sea Level Rise, Storm Surge and Coastal Flooding
Mr. Harris stated that last year the TPO adopted a Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment Study which included a tool used to model sea level rise. The TPO had a workshop with local stakeholders to train them on using this tool. This is the second phase of that study; it considers potential impacts of sea level rise combined with storm surge and coastal flooding. This year there are new impact areas as a result of the 100 year storm coastal flooding events and storm surge that was also modeled. Implementation strategies were also identified. He went over evacuation routes, critical facilities, transportation facilities, public works facilities and shelters. The two models of the phase are Coastal Flood Hazards model which FEMA uses to develop their flood insurance rate maps and relies on the 100 year still water elevation and still water depth to identify impacts of storm surge. The second model is the Coastal Surge model where storm surge and wave modeling is used to develop an estimate for wind and flood losses for a single hurricane event. He went over the sea level rise impacts with coastal flooding and the three target years of 2040, 2070 and 2100. He reviewed the financial exposure and some of the losses caused from sea level rise with coastal flooding could reach over $11 billion. There is a low, intermediate and high level curve. An analysis was done of Hurricane Dora, the last category 3 hurricane to make landfall in 1964 that was used as a model. Hurricane Matthew came close enough but was so recent the data was not available. The next step is to adopt the report and develop a
21
resiliency action plan and incorporate that into TPO documents, such as the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). Mr. Cheney asked what this means and what the implications are of this. Mr. Harris replied the TPO will take the report to the stakeholders to develop an action plan. Mr. Cheney asked what the action plan will address. Mr. Harris replied it will address the resiliency of transportation infrastructure and facilities to the effects of projected coastal flooding and projected sea level rise. Mr. Cheney asked how to sell that to an elected official. Mr. Harris replied that it should be explained to them that this action plan is how we can protect our assets, road assets, shelters and critical facilities against the effects of sea level rise and increased coastal flooding. The TPO will attempt to take the action plan and apply it to the facilities and it will be included in the next 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). This will be the first time an element that addresses sea level rise, coastal flooding and storm surge will be in the LRTP. Mr. Cheney stated the conservative Republicans do not believe in climate change and asked how to sell it to them. Mr. Harris suggested showing them this presentation and telling them that the economic impacts could be upwards of $11 billion by 2100; these are damages to their assets and infrastructure. Mr. Papa commented he thought there were two parts to this study and asked if he missed something; was Flagler County not included? Mr. Harris replied this study was from a grant where Volusia County and the stakeholders participated but not Flagler County; Phase 2 of the study covers Volusia County. The TPO intends to engage the stakeholders in Flagler County and ask if they would like to be a part of this. If so, they will make changes so that this plan incorporates urbanized areas of Flagler County. Another reason Flagler County is not in this study is the East Central Florida Planning Council is the lead agency and Flagler County is not a part of that planning council; it is part of the Northeast Florida Planning Council. This TPO has interlocal agreements with both planning councils so it can incorporate all of its planning area this study. Mr. Papa asked if the same policies and procedures that apply to Volusia County would apply to Flagler County. Mr. Harris replied yes. Mr. Harowski announced the Florida APA State Conference will be held in Daytona Beach in September and for those interested in this topic, there will be a half-day session on techniques and options for responding to sea level rise.
G. FDOT Report
Mr. Ferguson gave the FDOT report and gave specific details of various projects.
G. Volusia and Flagler County Construction Reports
Mr. Cheney gave the Volusia County Construction Report. He stated at last month’s meeting, Mr. Chad Lingenfelter, FDOT, had questions regarding the 10th Street project and the county is still waiting on the agreement from the Florida East Coast Railroad (FEC). Every time the county sends the agreement, FEC comes
22
back wanting more money. Originally, the FEC was going to pay for half of the trestle but they have backed off and now want the county to pay for 100%. If Mr. Lingenfelter is concerned about the railway signal arms and the condition, he can provide the money to the county and the county can incorporate it within the county project. The county is still working out an interlocal agreement with Edgewater and New Smyrna Beach because they are physically moving the road and it is taking longer than anticipated.
VI. Staff Comments
® Update on SunRail There was no update.
® Update on the I-95 to SR 417 Connector Environmental Study
Mr. Keeth stated the Central Florida Expressway Authority has issued the notice to proceed on the study. For those looking for an opportunity to be involved, they are compiling a stakeholder list and will be coordinating stakeholder meetings through the TPO; the TPO will keep the committee updated.
® Update on SR A1A Stabilization There was no update.
® Update on development of the new FY 2017/18 –FY 2021/22 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
Mr. Keeth stated the TPO has begun the development of the FY 2017/18-FY 2021/22 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). He asked for input on the jurisdictions’ locally funded transportation projects; this is a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requirement that the TPO include significant projects that are locally funded. The draft TIP will be reviewed at the May meetings and adopted in June. Mr. Keeth stated House Bill 865, filed by Representative Matt Caldwell of Lehigh Acres, calls for a fiscal analysis of moving the FDOT District 5 office from DeLand to Bartow; Bartow is not in the district, so it is expected that Bartow and the surrounding will be incorporated into the district. Mr. Keeth stated the TPO was in the process of receiving comments on the scope of the Bus Stop Improvement Plan. The deadline for comments is April 28, 2017. There are some significant implications for the cities and counties when it comes to bus stop improvements.
VII. TCC Member Comments
Mr. Ferguson announced it was his 60th birthday. Mr. Cheney reminded the committee if anyone had 2016 traffic counts to get them to the county so the spreadsheet can be updated. The county counts for 2016 are on the Volusia County website and he requested anyone doing traffic impact analyses to use the county counts. The counts are broken down into a.m., midday and p.m. peaks. The county is developing the critical/near critical map and hopes to have that published soon. There has been an increase in daily traffic, specifically on Williamson Boulevard.
VIII. Information Items
® March 22, 2017 River to Sea TPO Board Meeting Summary ® March TPO Outreach and Events ® Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Public Meeting Notice
IX. Adjournment There being no further business, the TCC meeting adjourned at 4:41 p.m.
23
RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION
________________________________________ MR. TIM BURMAN, CHAIRMAN
TECHNICAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE (TCC)
CERTIFICATE: The undersigned duly qualified and acting Recording Secretary of the River to Sea TPO certified that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the minutes of the April 18, 2017 regular meeting of the Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC), approved and duly signed this 16th day of May 2017. __________________________________________ DEBBIE STEWART, RECORDING SECRETARY RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION
24
MEETING SUMMARY CAC & TCC
MAY 16, 2017
IV. ACTION ITEMS A. REVIEW AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2017-## ADOPTING THE R2CTPO’S
TITLE VI POLICY STATEMENT & COMPLAINT PROCEDURES
Background Information: The purpose of the River to Sea TPO’s Title VI Plan is to establish and implement procedures that comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), as well as other related federal and state statutes and regulations. These procedures are necessary to conform to Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) regulations, as well to Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) guidelines. The TPO’s Title VI plan defines the purpose of Title VI, includes a written process on how to file a Title VI complaint, and describes the complaint investigation process. Title VI states “no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.” The River to Sea TPO’s Title VI Plan has been updated to reflect updated Federal Highway Administration requirements. The Title VI Plan is provided for your review and recommended approval.
A draft was provided for review in April. There have been no changes to the document as a result of the review.
ACTION REQUESTED: MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2017-## ADOPTING THE R2CTPO’S TITLE VI POLICY STATEMENT AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURES
25
RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION
RESOLUTION 2017-##
RESOLUTION OF THE RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION ADOPTING THE TITLE VI POLICY STATEMENT AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURES
_____________________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, the River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) is the duly designated and constituted body responsible for carrying out the urban transportation planning and programming process for Volusia County and portions of Flagler County inclusive of the cities of Flagler Beach, Beverly Beach, and portions of Palm Coast and Bunnell; and WHEREAS, Florida Statutes 339.175; 23 U.S.C. 134; and 49 U.S.C. 5303 require that the urbanized area, as a condition to the receipt of federal capital or operating assistance, have a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process that results in plans and programs consistent with the comprehensively planned development of the urbanized area; and WHEREAS, the River to Sea TPO has developed the Title VI Policy Statement and Complaint Procedures, whose purpose is to establish and implement procedures that comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), and other related federal and state statutes and regulations, and WHEREAS, the River to Sea TPO will not exclude participation in, deny the benefits of, or subject to discrimination anyone on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, religion, income or family status; and WHEREAS, the Title VI Policy Statement and Complaint Procedures have been provided for review by the general public, the River to Sea TPO’s Advisory Committees and the River to Sea TPO Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the River to Sea TPO that the: 1. River to Sea TPO Board and advisory committees have reviewed and adopted the
River to Sea TPO’s Title VI Policy Statement and Complaint Procedures; and the
2. River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization’s Title VI Policy Statement and Complaint Procedures are attached hereto as Attachment "A"; and the
4. Chairman of the TPO (or his designee) is hereby authorized and directed to
provide a copy of this resolution along with the adopted Title VI Policy Statement and Complaint Procedures to: a. the Florida Department of Transportation; b. the Federal Highway Administration, via the Florida Department of
26
Transportation; and the c. the Federal Transit Administration, via the Florida Department of
Transportation. DONE AND RESOLVED at the regularly convened meeting of the River to Sea TPO held on
the 24th day of May 2017.
RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION
__________________________________________ CITY OF FLAGLER BEACH COMMISSIONER MARSHALL SHUPE
CHAIRMAN, RIVER TO SEA TPO CERTIFICATE: The undersigned duly qualified and acting Recording Secretary of the River to Sea TPO certified that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution, adopted at a legally convened meeting of the River to Sea TPO held on May 24, 2017.
ATTEST: _______________________________________ DEBBIE STEWART, RECORDING SECRETARY RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION
27
RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION
TITLE VI POLICY STATEMENT AND DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCEDURES
TITLE VI POLICY STATEMENT
The River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization (R2CTPO) values diversity and both
welcomes and actively seeks input from all interested parties, regardless of cultural identity,
background or income level. Moreover, the River to Sea TPO does not tolerate discrimination in
any of its programs, services or activities. The River to Sea TPO will not exclude participation in,
deny the benefits of, or subject to discrimination anyone on the grounds of race, color, national
origin, sex, age, disability, religion, income or family status. The River to Sea TPO will actively work
to ensure the inclusion of everyone in our community so that the River to Sea TPO's programs,
services and activities represent the diversity we enjoy.
The purpose of the River to Sea TPO Title VI program is to establish and implement procedures
that comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), and other related federal and state statutes and
regulations. These procedures have been adopted to conform to Federal Transit Administration
(FTA) and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) regulations, as well as to the Florida
Department of Transportation (FDOT) guidelines.
COMPLAINT PROCEDURES
Filing of Title VI Complaints of Discrimination
Any person who feels that he/she has been subjected to race, color or national origin
discrimination under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, or other forms of discrimination based
upon sex, age, disability, religion, family or income status discrimination under related
nondiscrimination laws and regulations, may file a complaint with the River to Sea TPO.
28
A complaint must be filed within one hundred eighty (180) days after the date of the alleged
discrimination, unless the time for filing is extended by the FTA, FHWA or other federal authorities.
If possible, complaints should be submitted in writing, signed by the complainant or his/her
representative(s), and must include the following information:
1. Complainant(s) name, address and telephone number
2. Basis of the complaint (i.e. race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, religion, family or
income discrimination)
3. Date of the alleged discrimination
4. Statement of the complaint
5. Other agencies (state, local or federal) where the complaint has been filed
6. Explanation of the actions the complainant has taken or proposed to resolve the allegation in
the complaint
Allegations of discrimination received via facsimile, mail or e-mail will be acknowledged and
processed within five (5) business days. Allegations received by telephone will be documented in
writing and provided to the complainant(s) for review before processing. If the complainant is
hearing or speech-impaired, call the Florida Relay Service (FRS) by dialing 711 or 1-800-955-8771
(TTY) or email the Title VI Coordinator for assistance.
Complaints should be submitted to:
River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization
ATTN: Pamela Blankenship, Title VI Coordinator
2570 W. International Speedway Boulevard, Suite 100
Daytona Beach, FL 32114
Phone: 386.226.0422, ext. 20416
Fax: 386.226.0428
Complaint Investigation
Upon receipt of a signed complaint, the River to Sea TPO Title VI Coordinator will, within five (5)
business days, provide the complainant or his/her representative with a written acknowledgement
of the complaint.
29
The Title VI Coordinator will take reasonable steps to resolve the matter and respond to the
complaint within thirty (30) business days of receipt. The Title VI Coordinator will notify the
complainant in writing of the final decision and/or action recommended to be taken. The River to
Sea TPO’s Title VI Coordinator has ‘easy access’ to the TPO Executive Director and will immediately
report allegations of discrimination to the Executive Director.
If the complainant is dissatisfied with the River to Sea TPO’s final decision, the River to Sea Title VI
Coordinator shall forward the complaint, along with a record of its disposition, to the Florida
Department of Transportation (FDOT) Title VI Coordinator for further processing.
Should the complainant be unable or unwilling to complain to the River to Sea TPO, or if the
complainant is dissatisfied with the River to Sea TPO’s handling of a complaint, a written complaint
may be submitted directly to the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Title VI
Coordinator.
The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Title VI Coordinator can be contacted at:
Jacqueline E. Paramore
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Title VI Coordinator
605 Suwannee Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450
850-414-4753
Complaints may also be submitted directly to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). The DOJ will
ensure that the matter is assigned to the correct federal or state authority for processing.
The U.S. Department of Justice may be contacted at:
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Rights Division
Federal Coordination and Compliance Section, NWB
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20530
Title VI Hotline: 1-888-TITLE-06 (1-888-848-5306) (Voice / TTY)
https://www.justice.gov/crt/fcs/TitleVI-Overview
30
RETALIATION
Retaliation is prohibited under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related federal and state
nondiscrimination authorities. It is the policy of the River to Sea TPO that persons filing a complaint
of discrimination should have the right to do so without interference, intimidation, coercion or fear
of reprisal. Anyone who feels he/she has been subjected to retaliation should report such incident
to the River to Sea TPO’s Title VI Coordinator.
The TPO Title VI Coordinator will maintain a log of all verbal and written complaints received by
the TPO. The log will include:
1. Name of Complainant
2. Basis of Complaint (i.e., race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, religion, familial status
or retaliation)
3. Date of verbal or written complaint
4. Explanation of the actions the TPO has taken or proposed to resolve the issue raised in the
complaint
ADA/504 STATEMENT
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA),
and related federal and state laws and regulations forbid discrimination against those who have
disabilities. Furthermore, these laws require federal aid recipients and other government entities
to take affirmative steps to reasonably accommodate the disabled and ensure that their needs are
equitably represented in the transportation planning process.
The River to Sea TPO will make every effort to ensure that its facilities, programs, services and
activities are accessible to those with disabilities. The River to Sea TPO will also make every effort
to ensure that its advisory committees and public involvement activities include representation of
the disabled community and disability service groups.
The River to Sea TPO encourages the public to report any facility, program, service or activity that
appears inaccessible to the disabled. Furthermore, the River to Sea TPO will provide reasonable
accommodations to disabled individuals who wish to participate in public involvement events or
who require special assistance to access River to Sea TPO facilities, programs, services or activities.
Because providing reasonable accommodation may require outside assistance, organization or
31
resources, the River to Sea TPO asks that requests be made at least five (5) calendar days prior to
the need for accommodations.
The following notice is provided on all meeting agendas and notices:
Individuals covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 in need of accommodations for
this public meeting should contact the River to Sea TPO office, 2570 W. International Speedway
Blvd., Suite 100, Daytona Beach, Florida 32114-8145; (386) 226-0422, extension 20416, at least
five (5) working days prior to the meeting date.
Questions, concerns, comments or requests for accommodations should be made to:
River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization
ATTN: Pamela Blankenship, Title VI Coordinator
2570 W. International Speedway Boulevard, Suite 100
Daytona Beach, FL 32114
386.226.0422, ext. 20416
Fax: 386.226.0428
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
In order to plan for efficient, effective, safe, equitable and reliable transportation systems, the
River to Sea TPO must solicit the input of the public. The TPO expends extensive staff and financial
resources in the furtherance of this goal and strongly encourages the participation of the entire
community. The TPO offers a number of volunteer roles for those wishing to become more
involved in the planning process. The TPO also holds a number of transportation meetings,
workshops and other events designed to gather public input on planning activities. In addition, the
TPO attends and participates in other community events to promote its services and improve its
name recognition among the public. The TPO is constantly seeking ways of measuring the
effectiveness of its public involvement.
For more information on the TPO’s public involvement and measures of effectiveness, the public
may view the TPO Public Participation Plan (PPP), on the River to Sea TPO’s website
(http://www.r2ctpo.org/resources/planning-documents) and at the TPO office. Persons wishing to
request special presentations by the TPO, volunteer for any of its activities or offer suggestions for
32
the improvement of TPO public involvement activities may contact:
River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization
ATTN: Pamela Blankenship, Title VI Coordinator
2570 W. International Speedway Boulevard, Suite 100
Daytona Beach, FL 32114
386.226.0422 ext. 20416
Fax: 386.226.0428
DATA COLLECTION
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) regulations require federal-aid recipients to collect racial,
ethnic and other similar demographic data on beneficiaries of those affected by TPO programs,
services and activities. The TPO accomplishes this through the use of Census data, American
Community Survey reports, Environmental Screening Tools (EST), driver and ridership surveys as
well as other methods. From time to time, the TPO may find it necessary to request voluntary
identification of certain racial, ethnic or other data from those who participate in its public
involvement events. This information assists the TPO with improving its targeted outreach and
measures of effectiveness. Self-identification of personal data to the TPO will always be voluntary
and anonymous. Moreover, the TPO will not release or otherwise use this data in any manner
inconsistent with the federal regulations.
ASSURANCES
Each year, the TPO must certify to FHWA and FDOT that its programs, services and activities are
being conducted in a nondiscriminatory manner. These certifications are termed ‘assurances’ and
serve two important purposes. First, they document the TPO’s commitment to nondiscrimination
and equitable service to its community. Second, they serve as a legally enforceable agreement by
which the TPO may be held liable for breach. The public may view the annual assurances on the
TPO website (www.r2ctpo.org) or by visiting the TPO offices.
33
TITLE VI PROGRAM REVIEW AND TRAINING
The TPO's Title VI Program will be reviewed on an annual basis by the Title VI Coordinator to
ensure compliance with Title VI (policies, regulations, procedures, etc.). Updates to the Title VI
Plan will be made as needed.
The TPO's Title VI Coordinator will provide comprehensive staff training on Title VI and Limited
English Proficiency (LEP) on an annual basis.
34
Rio al Mar Organización de Planificación Transporte
Titulo VI / Programa Antidiscriminatorio Querella de Discriminación
Nombre del querellante:
Dirección:
Número de teléfono: Dirección de correo electrónico:
Nombre, dirección, teléfono y relación (ej. amigo, abogado, pariente, etc.) del Representante del querellante:
Nombre y dirección de la Agencia, Institución, o Departamento que usted alega discrimino en su contra:
Nombre(s) del Individuo(s) Quien(es) Usted Allega Discrimino Contra Usted Si lo(s) Conoce:
Razón de la discriminación:
¨ Raza ¨ Color ̈ Origen Nacional ¨ Incapacidad/Impedimento Físico ¨ Edad ¨ Sexo ¨ Represalia ¨ Status de Ingreso ¨ Otro
Fecha de la alegada discriminación:
Favor de indicar el nombre (s) y número(s) de teléfono(s) de alguna persona(s) que el Rio al Mar Organización de Planificación Transporte puede comunicarse para información adicional que clarifique o respalde su alegación o alegaciones.
Favor de explicar tan claro como sea posible, como, porque, cuando y donde usted cree que fue discriminado. Incluya suficiente información acerca de los antecedentes según le sea posible, de los alegados actos de discrimen. Puede añadir paginas adicionales, si es necesario.
Firma del Querellante(s) o su Representante: Fecha:
35
River to Sea to Sea Transportation Planning Organization
Title VI / Nondiscrimination Program
Complaint of Discrimination
Complainant(s) Name: Complainant(s) Address:
Complainant(s) Phone Number: E-mail Address:
Complainant's Representative's Name, Address, Phone Number and Relationship (e.g. friend, attorney, parent, etc.):
Name and Address of Agency, Institution, or Department Whom You Allege Discriminated Against You:
Names of the Individual(s) Whom You Allege Discriminated Against You (If Known):
Discrimination Because of:
ÿ糎Race Zÿ糎Color Zÿ糎National Origin ÿ Sex Zÿ糎Age Zÿ糎Handicap/Disability ÿ糎Income Status Zÿ糎Retaliation ÿ糎Other
Date of Alleged Discrimination:
Please list the name(s) and phone number(s) of any person, if known, that the River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization could contact for additional information to support or clarify your allegation(s).
Please explain as clearly as possible how, why, when and where you believe you were discriminated against. Include as much background information as possible about the alleged acts of discrimination. Additional pages may be attached if needed.
Complainant(s) or Complainant(s) Representative(s) Signature: Date of Signature:
36
MEETING SUMMARY CAC & TCC
MAY 16, 2017
IV. ACTION ITEMS B. REVIEW AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2017-## ADOPTING THE R2CTPO’S
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY (LEP) ACCESS PLAN
Background Information: The Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Plan addresses the TPO’s responsibilities as recipients of federal financial assistance as they relate to the needs of individuals with limited English language skills. The goal of the River to Sea TPO Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Plan is to ensure that the TPO recognizes the needs of limited English proficient (LEP) members of the community, implements a plan to communicate effectively and ensures reasonable access to our processes, information and decision-making. The River to Sea TPO’s Limited English Proficiency Plan has been updated to reflect updated Federal Highway Administration requirements. In addition, the demographic and socioeconomic data for the TPO's metropolitan planning area has been updated. The LEP Plan is provided for your review and recommended approval. A draft was provided for review in April. There have been no changes to the document as a result of the review.
ACTION REQUESTED: MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2017-## ADOPTING THE R2CTPO’S LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY (LEP) PLAN
37
RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION
RESOLUTION 2017-##
RESOLUTION OF THE RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION ADOPTING THE LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY ACCESS (LEP) PLAN
_____________________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, the River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) is the duly designated and constituted body responsible for carrying out the urban transportation planning and programming process for Volusia County and portions of Flagler County inclusive of the cities of Flagler Beach, Beverly Beach, and portions of Palm Coast and Bunnell; and WHEREAS, Florida Statutes 339.175; 23 U.S.C. 134; and 49 U.S.C. 5303 require that the urbanized area, as a condition to the receipt of federal capital or operating assistance, have a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process that results in plans and programs consistent with the comprehensively planned development of the urbanized area; and WHEREAS, the River to Sea TPO has developed the Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Access Plan, whose purpose is to ensure that the River to Sea TPO recognizes the needs of limited English proficient (LEP) members of the community, implements a plan to communicate effectively and ensures reasonable access to our processes, information and decision-making, and WHEREAS, the Limited English Proficiency Access Plan has been provided for review by the general public, the River to Sea TPO’s Advisory Committees and the River to Sea TPO Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the River to Sea TPO that the: 1. River to Sea TPO Board and advisory committees have reviewed and adopted the
River to Sea TPO’s Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Access Plan; and the
2. River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization’s Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Access Plan is attached hereto as Attachment "A"; and the
4. Chairman of the TPO (or his designee) is hereby authorized and directed to
provide a copy of this resolution along with the adopted Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Access Plan to: a. the Florida Department of Transportation; b. the Federal Highway Administration, via the Florida Department of
Transportation; and the c. the Federal Transit Administration, via the Florida Department of
Transportation.
38
DONE AND RESOLVED at the regularly convened meeting of the River to Sea TPO held on
the 24th day of May 2017.
RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION
__________________________________________ CITY OF FLAGLER BEACH COMMISSIONER MARSHALL SHUPE
CHAIRMAN, RIVER TO SEA TPO CERTIFICATE: The undersigned duly qualified and acting Recording Secretary of the River to Sea TPO certified that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution, adopted at a legally convened meeting of the River to Sea TPO held on May 24, 2017.
ATTEST: _______________________________________ DEBBIE STEWART, RECORDING SECRETARY RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION
39
River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization
Limited English Proficiency Access Plan
I. Introduction
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits recipients of federal financial assistance from discriminating against or otherwise excluding individuals on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any of their activities. It has been recognized that one form of discrimination occurs through an inability to communicate due to a limited proficiency in the English language. This limitation is often the result of an individual’s national origin. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Executive Order 13166 and various directives from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) require federal aid recipients to take reasonable steps to ensure meaningful access to programs, services and activities by those who do not speak English well.
To determine the extent to which LEP services are required and in which languages, the law requires the analysis of four factors:
1. The number or proportion of LEP persons eligible to be served or likely to be encountered by the River to Sea TPO’s programs, services or activities;
2. The frequency with which LEP individuals come in contact with these programs, services or activities;
3. The nature and importance of the program, service, or activity to people’s lives; and 4. The resources available and the overall cost to the River to Sea TPO.
The goal of the River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization (R2CTPO) Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Access Plan is to ensure that the River to Sea TPO recognizes the needs of limited English proficient (LEP) members of the community, implements a plan to communicate effectively and ensures reasonable access to our processes, information and decision-making.
Background
On August 11, 2000, the President issued Executive Order 13166, entitled "Improving Access to Services by Persons with Limited English Proficiency,” 65 FR 50121 (August 16, 2000). On the same day, the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights at the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a Policy Guidance Document, entitled "Enforcement of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 – National Origin Discrimination Against Persons With Limited English Proficiency” (hereinafter referred to as "DOJ LEP Guidance"), reprinted at 65 FR 50123 (August 16, 2000). In addition, the U.S. Department of
40
Transportation (USDOT) issued a policy guidance document, titled “Policy Guidance Concerning Recipients’ Responsibilities to Limited English Proficient (LEP) Persons,” reprinted at 70 FR 74087, dated December 14, 2005.
Executive Order 13166 requires federal agencies to: (1) examine services provided, (2) identify specific needs necessary to provide meaningful access for Limited English Proficiency (LEP) persons, and (3) implement a system to provide meaningful access to such services. The DOJ LEP Guidance advises each federal department or agency to "take reasonable steps to ensure ‘meaningful’ access [to LEP individuals] to the information and services they provide." [DOJ LEP Guidance, 65 FR at 50124]. The DOJ LEP Guidance goes on to provide that:
What constitutes reasonable steps to ensure meaningful access will be contingent on a number of factors. Among the factors to be considered is the number or proportion of LEP persons in the eligible service population, the frequency with which LEP individuals come in contact with the program, the importance of the service provided by the program, and the resources available to the agency.
The DOJ LEP Guidance explains that the identification of "reasonable steps" to provide oral and written services in languages other than English is to be determined on a case-by-case basis through a balancing of all four factors. The DOJ LEP and USDOT Guidance focus principally on the obligation of federal departments and agencies extending federal financial assistance to clarify the long-standing legal obligation on the part of recipients of such assistance to address the language needs of their otherwise-eligible LEP beneficiaries. Executive Order 13166 applies this same obligation to programs and activities undertaken directly by a federal department or agency. Section 2 of the Executive Order directs each federal department or agency "to prepare a plan to improve access to . . . federally conducted programs and activities by eligible LEP persons . . . consistent with the standards set forth in the LEP Guidance . . .”
The River to Sea TPO's Limited English Proficiency Plan works in concert with its Public Participation Plan (PPP), which identifies specific tactics for outreach and involvement.
II. River to Sea TPO Four-Factor Analysis
To determine the extent to which LEP services are required and in which languages, the law requires the analysis of four factors. The following sections address each of these factors with respect to the River to Sea TPO planning area.
Factor 1: Review of LEP Populations Understanding the needs of the community begins with identifying the number of Limited English Proficiency (LEP) persons eligible to be served, likely to be served or likely to be encountered by the River to Sea TPO through its programs, services or activities. In an effort to determine potential LEP needs within the River to Sea TPO planning area, TPO staff reviewed the data available through the U.S. Census Bureau American Fact Finder for the period of 2011 through 2015. Data collected for Volusia County indicated that 4.3% of households speak English “less than very well.” A further breakdown of the data showed that 3.1% speak Spanish as the primary language. Other languages (other than
41
Spanish) spoken in households that speak English “less than very well” include Indo-European (.9 0.7%), Asian and Pacific Islander (0.4%) and Other (0.2%) (see Table 1). This information led staff to review the Spanish speaking LEP group to identify whether this population was concentrated into specific communities.
Table 1: The Top Languages Spoken at Home in Volusia County
Table 1: The Top Five Languages Spoken at Home in Volusia County (US Census Bureau’s 2011-2015 American Community Survey)
Population 5 years and older
Number of LEP Persons
Percent of Population over 5 years old that are LEP
LEP Persons who speak Spanish
LEP Persons who speak Indo-European Languages
LEP Persons who speak Asian and Pacific Islander Languages
LEP Persons who speak Other Languages
479,923 20,815 4.3% 3.01% 0.7% 0.4% 0.2%
After reviewing a breakdown of Volusia County Spanish LEP populations by city, (2011-2015 American Community Survey Five-Year Estimates), it became clear that much of the data was not statistically significant when viewed on a local level; however, the data did appear to indicate a slight concentration of Spanish speaking LEP persons in the city of Deltona (9.3%) and the town of Pierson (23.0%). Because the River to Sea TPO realizes that statistical data can be outdated or inaccurate, TPO staff worked with the local public transit provider, Votran, to confirm estimates of LEP populations. Under the Title VI program, Spanish was reported to be the prevalent LEP language and the geographic locations of those populations were consistent with the TPO analysis. Table 2: The Top Languages Spoken at Home in Flagler County
Table 2: The Top Five Languages Spoken at Home in Flagler County (US Census Bureau’s 2011-2015 American Community Survey)
Population 5 years and older
Number of LEP Persons
Percent of Population over 5 years old that are LEP
LEP Persons who speak Spanish
LEP Persons who speak Indo-European Languages
LEP Persons who speak Asian and Pacific Islander Languages
LEP Persons who speak Other Languages
96,414 6,465 6.7% 2.76 % 6.7% 1.6% 0.3%
Flagler County does not have a substantial population of people who rely solely on a language other than English; however, as Table 2 (above) shows, an estimated 6.7% of the population 5 years and over speak English “less than very well.” While a sizeable portion of that group is comprised of Spanish speakers (2.76%), 6.7% are those who speak Indo-European languages. This family of languages (other than Spanish) includes Russian, along with other major language groups such as Irish, Polish, French, German, Portuguese and Italian. Anecdotally, this has been attributed to a significant Russian-speaking population in Flagler County (See Table 2).
42
Factor 2: Assessing Frequency of Contact with LEP Persons
The results of the Census data indicate that Spanish is the most prevalent language spoken by the LEP population in the area covered by the River to Sea TPO. To date, the TPO has not received any requests for translation or interpretation of its programs, services or activities into Spanish or any other language. The TPO has translated and distributed a Spanish language version of the “Tell the TPO” transportation survey and four were returned to the TPO. The TPO has not, for the most part, had any LEP attendees at public events.
Factor 3: Assessing the Importance of TPO Programs
All of the River to Sea TPO programs are important; however, those related to safety, public transit, right-of-way, the environment, nondiscrimination and public involvement are among the most important. The TPO must ensure that all segments of the population, including LEP persons, have been involved or have had the opportunity to be involved in the transportation planning process to be consistent with the goal of the Federal Environmental Justice Program and Policy.
Factor 4: Determining Available Resources
When planning any activity, it is imperative that an organization assess the resources available to conduct the activity in a way that is meaningful and balances those efforts with the overall cost to the organization. Given the size of the Spanish LEP population in the River to Sea TPO planning area and current financial constraints, full language translations of plan documents are not considered warranted or cost feasible at this time; however, the River to Sea TPO is fortunate to house within its jurisdiction a number of institutions of higher education and military facilities, both of which have extensive language services. The TPO will continue to evaluate its programs, services and activities to ensure that persons who may be LEP are always provided with meaningful access.
The analyses of these four factors suggest that, although the costs for providing access are reasonable, the need is limited and extensive LEP services are not required at this time. Nevertheless, the River to Sea TPO believes that Spanish language assistance is necessary for certain activities in order to provide broad access by members of the public.
III. Language Access Implementation Plan and Procedures
A limited English proficiency plan helps management and staff members understand their roles and responsibilities with respect to overcoming language barriers for LEP individuals. It is a management roadmap that outlines how the agency defines tasks, assigns responsibilities and allocates the resources necessary to come into, or maintain compliance with, language access requirements. It describes how the agency will meet the service delivery standards delineated in the policy directives, provide notice of language assistance services, provide staff training and conduct ongoing monitoring and evaluation. The following sections outline the activities that are being undertaken by the River to Sea TPO to comply with LEP needs.
43
Administer LEP services by:
1. Assigning a staff member to oversee the LEP program; this includes the development and implementation of this plan and annually examining the LEP plan to ensure that it remains reflective of the community’s needs.
2. Documenting the number and type of contacts by LEP persons and activities and events requiring LEP assistance.
3. Ensuring that the River to Sea TPO staff is familiar with the requirements and resources for LEP persons.
Provide verbal translation as follows:
1. The Census Bureau’s “I Speak” language cards are available at the TPO's reception desk and TPO staff is able to identify language needs in order to match them with available services.
2. A list of support contacts who competently speak Spanish and who are willing to provide translation and/or interpretation services is maintained. The resource list has been distributed to TPO staff.
3. Agreements have been made with local agencies, colleges, universities and community partners to provide oral and written LEP services with reasonable notification.
4. Events and activities that may require a translator to ensure meaningful access by LEP persons have been identified and will be periodically updated.
Provide written translation as follows:
1. Meeting notifications are provided in English and Spanish, where appropriate.
2. Outreach documents include a notice that language services are available free of charge in a language LEP persons can understand: “Persons who require translation services, which are provided at no cost, should contact the River to Sea TPO at (386) 226-0422 or by email at [email protected] at least five (5) business days prior to the event.”
3. Spanish language outreach materials from other organizations including federal, state and local transportation agencies are provided whenever possible.
4. Documents that will be provided in Spanish language format have been, and will continue to be, identified.
LEP Services Required
Given the four-factor analysis, the River to Sea TPO has identified the following documents for translation into Spanish language format:
· The Walk and Ride Bicycle & Pedestrian Safety Video · The Tell the TPO Survey, which is issued biannually · Spanish, as well as other language formats, have been made available on the TPO website using
Google Translate
44
The TPO has also identified the following events and activities that will require a Spanish language translator:
· Univision Telefutura Health Fair · Public outreach events in Northwest Volusia
For questions or concerns regarding the River to Sea TPO’s commitment to nondiscrimination or to request LEP services, contact Pamela Blankenship, Title VI Coordinator, at (386) 226-0422 ext. 20416 or by email at [email protected].
45
MEETING SUMMARY CAC & TCC
MAY 16, 2017
IV. ACTION ITEMS C. REVIEW AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2017-## AMENDING THE FY 2016/17
TO 2020/21 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) Background Information: This proposed TIP amendment provides $124,623 in additional funds for construction of FM# 4355321 Big Tree Road Shared Use Path pursuant to a request by the City of South Daytona. It also adds $358,546 for construction of FM# 4355951 Doyle Road Paved Shoulders from Lush Ln to Courtland Blvd as requested by Volusia County. Both requests were reviewed by the advisory committees and approved by the TPO Board in April. The proposed amendment is more fully described in the enclosed Resolution 2017-## and Attachment "A”. ACTION REQUESTED: MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2017-## AMENDING THE FY 2016/17 TO 2020/21 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP)
46
RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION
RESOLUTION 2017-##
RESOLUTION OF THE RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION AMENDING THE FY 2016/17 TO FY 2020/21
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) ______________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, the River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) is the duly designated and constituted body responsible for carrying out the urban transportation planning and programming process for Volusia County and portions of Flagler County inclusive of the cities of Flagler Beach, Beverly Beach and portions of Palm Coast and Bunnell; and WHEREAS, Florida Statutes 339.175; 23 U.S.C. 134; and 49 U.S.C. 5303 require that the urbanized area, as a condition to the receipt of federal capital or operating assistance, have a continuing, cooperative and comprehensive transportation planning process that results in plans and programs consistent with the comprehensively planned development of the urbanized area; and
WHEREAS, the River to Sea TPO shall annually endorse and amend as appropriate, the plans and programs required by 23 C.F.R. 450.300 through 450.324, among which is the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP); and WHEREAS, the River to Sea TPO’s adopted TIP is required to be consistent with the Florida Department of Transportation’s adopted Five-Year Work Program; and
WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Transportation has provided additional information to the River to Sea TPO regarding the FDOT adopted Five-Year Work Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the River to Sea TPO that the:
1. River to Sea TPO’s FY 2016/17 to FY 2020/21 TIP is hereby amended as shown in Attachment "A" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and the
2. Chairman of the River to Sea TPO (or his designee) is hereby authorized and
directed to submit the FY 2016/17 to FY 2020/21 TIP as amended to the: a. Florida Department of Transportation; b. Federal Transit Administration (FTA) (through the Florida Department of
Transportation); and the c. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (through the Florida
Department of Transportation).
47
DONE AND RESOLVED at the regularly convened meeting of the River to Sea TPO held on the 24th day of May 2017.
RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION
______________________________________ FLAGLER BEACH COMMISSIONER MARSHALL SHUPE
CHAIRMAN, RIVER TO SEA TPO CERTIFICATE: The undersigned duly qualified and acting Recording Secretary of the River to Sea TPO certified that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution, adopted at a legally convened meeting of the River to Sea TPO held on May 24, 2017. ATTEST: ________________________________________ DEBBIE STEWART, RECORDING SECRETARY RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION
48
Attachment "A"
Resolution 2017-##
Amending the
FY 2016/17 - FY 2020/21
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
Proposed for adoption May 24, 2017
49
River to Sea TPO Transportation Improvement Program - FY 2016/17 - 2020/21
[Note: Underlined type indicates an addition; struck-through type indicates a deletion.] Pg 2 of 3
4355321 Big Tree Road Shared Use Path Non-SIS
Work Summary: BIKE PATH/TRAIL From:
James Street
To:
SR 5A (Nova Rd)
Lead Agency: City of South Daytona Length:
Phase Fund Source
2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Total
PE LF 19,700 0 0 0 0 19,700
CEI LF 50,000 47,268
0 0 0 0 50,000 47,268
CEI SU ACSU 27,500 0 0 0 0 27,500
CST SU ACSU 450,000 607,161
0 0 0 0 450,000 607,161
CST LF 50,000 494
0 0 0 0 50,000 494
Total 577,500 702,123
0 0 0 0 577,500 702,123
Prior Cost < 2016/17: 0
Future Cost > 2020/21: 0
Total Project Cost: 577,500 702,123
Project Description: LAP agreement with the City of South Daytona to construct a 10' wide shared use path along Big Tree Road from James Street to SR 5A (Nova Road). (Reference 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan, pgs 10, 11, 85, table 31 on pg 73.)
50
River to Sea TPO Transportation Improvement Program - FY 2016/17 - 2020/21
[Note: Underlined type indicates an addition; struck-through type indicates a deletion.] Pg 3 of 3
4355951 Doyle Road Paved Shoulders from Lush Ln to Courtland Blvd Non-SIS
Work Summary: PAVED SHOULDERS From:
Lush Lane
To:
Lead Agency: Volusia County Length: 0.795 mile
Phase Fund
Source 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Total
PE LF 98,662 0 0 0 0 98,662 CEI LF 0 101,562 0 0 0 101,562
CEI SU 0 5,000 0 0 0 5,000
CST ACSU 0 500,000 0 0 0 500,000
CST SU 0 677,074 535,620
0 0 0 677,074 535,620
Total 98,662 783,636 1,142,182
0 0 0 882,298 1,240,844
Prior Cost < 2016/17: 0
Future Cost > 2020/21: 0
Total Project Cost: 1,240,844
Project Description: LAP agreement with Volusia County to add paved shoulders on Doyle Road between Lush Lane and Courtland Boulevard. The TPO's support for traffic operations, intelligent transportation systems (ITS), and safety projects is expressed on page 65, table 31 on page 73 of the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan.
51
SUMMARY SHEET CAC & TCC
MAY 16, 2017
IV. ACTION ITEMS
D. REVIEW AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2017-## SUPPORTING UPDATES TO THE FLORIDA GREENWAYS AND TRAIL SYSTEM (FGTS) PLAN AND THE OPPORTUNITY AND PRIORITY MAPS
Background Information:
The Florida Office of Greenways and Trails (OGT) is seeking input for the update of the Florida Greenways and Trails System (FGTS) Plan and the Opportunity and Priority Maps. The FGTS Plan and maps are being updated in 2016 through 2017 through a detailed schedule. Updates are requested on or before June 30, 2017. The updated FGTS Plan and maps will guide implementation of the connected statewide trail system from 2018 through 2022.
Resolution 2017-## requests the following: · designating the Palm Coast to Bulow Corridor a Land Trail Priority Corridor and extending it
north to the River to Sea TPO boundary; · designating the Bunnell to Ormond Connector a Land Trail Priority Corridor and extending it
north to the Flagler/St. Johns County line; · designating the SR 40 Trail Corridor a Land Trail Priority Corridor; and· designating the Cross Volusia Trail Corridor a Land Trail Priority Corridor.
A map depicting these corridors is included in the agenda. A draft of this proposal was presented in April.
ACTION REQUESTED:
MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2017-## SUPPORTING UPDATES TO THE FLORIDA GREENWAYS AND TRAIL SYSTEM (FGTS) PLAN AND THE OPPORTUNITY AND PRIORITY MAPS
52
RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION
RESOLUTION 2017-##
RESOLUTION OF THE RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION SUPPORTING UPDATES TO THE FLORIDA GREENWAYS AND TRAILS SYSTEM (FGTS) PLAN
AND THE OPPORTUNITY AND PRIORITY MAPS _____________________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, the River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) is the duly designated and constituted body responsible for carrying out the urban transportation planning and programming process for Volusia County and portions of Flagler County inclusive of the cities of Flagler Beach, Beverly Beach, and portions of Palm Coast and Bunnell; and WHEREAS, Florida Statutes 339.175; 23 U.S.C. 134; and 49 U.S.C. 5303 require that the urbanized area, as a condition to the receipt of federal capital or operating assistance, have a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process that results in plans and programs consistent with the comprehensively planned development of the urbanized area; and WHEREAS, the Florida Greenways and Trails System (FGTS) Plan establishes the vision for implementing a connected statewide system of greenways and trails for recreation, conservation, alternative transportation, healthy lifestyles, a vibrant economy, a high quality of life; and WHEREAS, the FGTS Plan and Priority Maps were last updated in 2012 and the Opportunity Maps updated in 2015; and WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Office of Greenways and Trails (OGT) is seeking input to update the FGTS Plan and the Opportunity and Priority Maps; and
WHEREAS, the updated FGTS Plan and the Opportunity and Priority Maps will guide
implementation of the connected statewide trail system from 2018 through 2022; and WHEREAS, the River to Sea TPO is a strong proponent of the provision of bicycle and
pedestrian facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the River to Sea TPO that the:
1. River to Sea TPO supports updates to the Florida Greenways and Trails System (FGTS) Plan and the Opportunity and Priority Maps by designating the Palm Coast to Bulow Corridor a Land Trail Priority Corridor and extending it north to the River to Sea TPO boundary; and
2. Designating the Bunnell to Ormond Connector a Land Trail Priority Corridor and extending it north to the Flagler/St. Johns County Line; and
3. Designating the State Road 40 Trail Corridor a Land Trail Priority Corridor; and
53
4. Designating the Cross Volusia Trail Corridor a Land Trail Priority Corridor; and the
5. Chairman of the River to Sea TPO (or his designee) is hereby authorized and directed to submit this resolution to the following:
a. Florida Department of Transportation; b. Federal Transit Administration (FTA) (through the Florida Department of
Transportation); c. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (through the Florida Department of
Transportation); d. Florida Greenways and Trails Council; e. East Central Florida Regional Planning Council (ECFRPC); f. Members of the Central Florida MPO Alliance; and g. Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Office of Greenways
and Trails (OGT);
DONE AND RESOLVED at the regular meeting of the River to Sea TPO held on the 24TH day of May, 2017.
RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION
_______________________________________ FLAGLER BEACH COMMISSIONER MARSHALL SHUPE
CHAIRMAN, RIVER TO SEA TPO CERTIFICATE: The undersigned duly qualified and acting Recording Secretary of the River to Sea TPO certified that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution, adopted at a legally convened meeting of the River to Sea TPO held on May 24, 2017. ATTEST: _____________________________________ DEBBIE STEWART, RECORDING SECRETARY RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION
54
0 10 20 30 405Miles
µM A P I N D E XM A P I N D E X
NortheastNortheastRegionRegion
¹L A N D T R A I LL A N D T R A I L
O P P O R T U N I T I E SO P P O R T U N I T I E S
Map Date: 9/29/16
*LAND TRAIL OPPORTUNITY CORRIDORS
* The different colors of the Land Trails represent the beginning and ending points of individual corridors.
LAND TRAIL PRIORITY CORRIDORS
55
East Coast Greenway-Flagler Corridor
East Coast Greenway-Volusia Corridor
East Central Regional Rail Trail - ECG Corridor
Lehigh Greenway Rail Trail Corridor
State Road 40 Trail Corridor
US 17 Trail Corridor
Cross Volusia Trail Corridor
Bunnell to Ormond Connector
Palm Coast to Bulow Corridor
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp., NRCAN,Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
±
0 5 10 15 202.5Miles
Florida Greenways & Trails System (FGTS) Plan
LegendLand Trail Priority CorridorsLand Trail Opportunity CorridorsProposed Land Trail Priority Corridors56
MEETING SUMMARY CAC & TCC
MAY 16, 2017
V. PRESENTATIONS, STATUS REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS A. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION OF THE TPO’S DRAFT PRIORITY PROJECT LISTS
Background Information: The River to Sea TPO develops seven lists of priority projects (LOPP), each representing a different category of projects. Once adopted, the lists are transmitted to the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) district office for use in allocating transportation funds to the area. Two of the priority project lists – the Strategic Intermodal System projects (SIS); Regionally Significant, and Non-SIS Roadway projects list – are generally updated following the update or revision of the TPO's Long Range Transportation Plan. Four additional lists – the Traffic Operations, Safety, and Local Initiatives (traffic operations-focused) projects; Bicycle/Pedestrian and Local Initiatives (bicycle/pedestrian-focused) projects; Regional Trails projects; and Transportation Planning studies – are updated annually with the "call for projects". Project applications submitted to the TPO are reviewed and ranked based upon the criteria developed through the committee process and approved by the River to Sea TPO Board. For Transit projects, the TPO generally defers to Votran and Flagler County Public Transportation to determine project priorities. The draft priority project lists reflect changes to the status of projects already on the lists (e.g., completed phase(s), updated cost estimates, etc.). The draft Traffic Operations, Safety, and Local Initiatives Project List will be provided under separate cover. The Transportation Planning Studies list includes new projects received through the "call for projects". These have been reviewed and scored by the TIP Subcommittee and added in ranked order according to the project scores. The draft Bicycle/Pedestrian and Local Initiatives (bicycle/pedestrian-focused) project list and the Regional Trails project list will be reviewed by the Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee and are provided herein to the CAC and TCC for information purposes only. The draft List of Priority Projects are provided for your review. A marked up version is also provided to reflect changes from the 2016 Lists of Priority Projects. ACTION REQUESTED:
NO ACTION REQUIRED UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE COMMITTEE
57
DRAF
TPg 1
River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization
2017 LIST OF PRIORITY PROJECTS Page
STRATEGIC INTERMODAL SYSTEM (SIS) PROJECTS ............................................................................................................................................................. 2
REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT, NON‐SIS ROADWAY PROJECTS ............................................................................................................................................... 3
TRAFFIC OPERATIONS, SAFETY, AND LOCAL INITIATIVES PROJECTS .................................................................................................................................. 6
BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN AND B/P LOCAL INITIATIVES PROJECTS ......................................................................................................................................... 13
TRANSIT PROJECTS ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 20
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING STUDIES ............................................................................................................................................................................ 21
58
DRAF
TPg 2
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Projects DRAFT 5/9/17
Priority Rank1 FDOT FM#
R2CTPO Project# Project Name Project Limits Project Type Programmed Phase(s) Needed Phase(s)
Estimated Total Project Cost Comments
1 4084642 P12s‐202‐01
I‐4 widening to 10 Lanes (1‐4 Beyond the Ultimate)
Volusia/Seminole county line to 1/2 mile east of SR 472
widening PE ‐ $1,228,818‐FY 16/17; ENV ‐ $150,270 ‐ FY 17/18
ROW ‐ $46.355 million;CST ‐ $372.07 million (all costs are 2014)
$424.8 million To be funded as a public‐private partnership using tolled lanes
SR 472 ‐ widen from 4 lanes to 6
Graves Av to Kentucky/MLK Blvd
widening CST ‐ $40.48 million, $40.48 million To be undertaken as part of the I‐4 Beyond the Ultimate Project; also on Regionally‐Significant, Non‐SIS List
Saxon Blvd Ramp/Roadway
I‐4 to Normandy Blvd
CST ‐ $35.38 million $35.38 million To be undertaken as part of the I‐4 Beyond the Ultimate Project
Rhode Island Extension Veterans Memorial Pkwy to Normandy Blvd
CST ‐ $34.87 million $34.87 million To be undertaken as part of the I‐4 Beyond the Ultimate Project
2 4102511 P10s‐205‐01
SR 15 (US 17) ‐ widen to 4 lanes
Ponce de Leon Blvd to SR 40
widening PE ‐ $455,410 ‐ FY 16/17; ROW ‐ $ 13,691,472 ‐ FY 16/17 through FY 20/21; RRU ‐ $3,000,000 ‐ FY 20/21; CST ‐ $50,186,043 ‐ FY 20/21
$76.7million FULLY‐FUNDED
3 4289471 P11s‐201‐01
SR 40 ‐ widen to 6 lanes Williamson to Breakaway Tr
widening PE ‐ $2.13 million, ENV ‐$0.13, ROW ‐ $7.43 million, CST ‐ $22.99 million, (all costs are 2014)
$33 .26 million (2014)
Also on Regionally‐Significant, Non‐SIS List
4 2408371 P10s‐206‐01
SR 40 ‐ widen to 4 lanes Cone Rd to SR 11 widening ROW ‐ $2.3 million,CST ‐ $41.5 million (all costs are 2015)
$50.36 million
5 2408361 P10s‐207‐01
SR 40 ‐ widen to 4 lanes SR 11 to SR 15 (US 17)
widening ENV ‐ $4,500,000 ‐ FY 16/17ROW ‐ $5,246,000 ‐ FY 21/22
CST ‐ $35.0million; (all costs are2017)
$48.5 million (2017)
6 SR 100 ‐ widen to 6 lanes
Old Kings Rd to Belle Terre Pkwy
widening ROW ‐ $3.17 million; CST ‐ $31.70 million
$34.87 million (2015)
Also on Regionally Significant, Non‐SIS Projects List
1 Projects which are ranked one through five on the List of Prioritized SIS Roadway Projects will remain in their current spot or move to the next available higher spot until they are completed and drop out of the Work Program.
59
DRAF
T
Pg 3
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Regionally Significant, Non‐SIS Projects DRAFT 5/9/17
Priority Rank2
FDOT FM#
R2CTPO Project# Project Name Project Limits Project Type
Programmed Phase(s) Needed Phase(s)
Estimated Total Project Cost Comments
1 US 1 intersections (from the US 1 AIS)
intersection improvements
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
4371211 SR 5 (US 1) at Park Av SR 5 (US 1) at Park Av ‐ ‐ PE‐ $372,000 ‐FY 19/20
CST TBD Southbound right turn lane added as part of FM# 4268891, US 1 Median Modifications); PE for signal system upgrade to improve intersection operations is programmed in FY 19/20
2409925 P10r‐210‐05
SR 5 (US 1) at Canal St Intersection Improvements
SR 5 (US 1) at Canal St ‐ ‐ PE ‐ $107,342 – FY 16/17; ROW ‐ $5,718 – FY 16/17; RRU ‐ $605,264 – FY CST ‐ $4,887,349‐ FY 18/19
‐ ‐ 7,345,128 FULLY‐FUNDED
2409927 P10r‐210‐08
SR 5 (US 1) at Reed Canal Rd Intersection Improvements
SR 5 (US 1) at Reed Canal Rd ‐ ‐ PE ‐ $7,793 – FY 16/17; ROW ‐ $15,152 – FY 16/17; CST ‐ $1,279,781‐ FY 16/17 through FY 17/18
‐ ‐ $2,485,713 FULLY‐FUNDED
2409928 P10r‐210‐06
SR 5 (US 1) at Big Tree Rd Intersection Improvements
SR 5 (US 1) at Big Tree Rd Intersection
‐ ‐ PE ‐ $10,389 – FY 16/17; ROW ‐ $17,171 – FY 16/17; CST ‐ $635,530 ‐ FY 17/18
‐ ‐ $1,237,336 FULLY‐FUNDED
2 4081781 P10r‐212‐01
SR 483 (Clyde Morris Blvd) widen to 6 lanes
SR 400 (Beville Rd) to SR 600 (US 92 ‐ International Speedway Blvd)
widening PE ‐ $13,934 – FY 16/17; ROW ‐ $24,673,760 ‐ FY 17/18 through FY 21/22
CST ‐ $29.1million (2017)
$70.1 CST cost matches CFLRoads info last updated 2017
2 Projects which are ranked one through five on the List of Prioritized Regionally Significant, Non‐SIS Roadway Projects will remain in their current spot or move to the next available higher spot until they are completed and drop out of the Work Program.
60
DRAF
T
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Regionally Significant, Non‐SIS Roadway Projects – Continued…
Pg 4
Priority Rank2
FDOT FM#
R2CTPO Project# Project Name Project Limits Project Type
Programmed Phase(s) Needed Phase(s)
Estimated Total Project Cost Comments
3 4159641 P14r‐202‐01
Old Kings Rd widen from 2 lanes to 4
Palm Coast Pkwy to Forest Grove Dr
widening CST ‐ $13,250,000 (2014); CEI ‐ $1,600,000 (2014)
$17,260,000 Cost estimates per Table 1, Palm Coast FY 14/15 ‐ FY 2018/19 FDOT 5‐Yr Work Program Project Priorities
4 ‐ ‐ P11r‐208‐01
SR 44 – Miscellaneous upgrades to improve access to DeLand SunRail
between SR 15A and SunRail Station
misc. upgrades to improve access to the SunRail station
‐ ‐ ROW ‐ $1.74,CST ‐ $17.36
$19,100,000 SR 44 corridor study completed
5 4226271 P11R‐209‐01
US 92 – widen from 4 to 6 lanes
I‐4 EB Ramps to SR 600 (US 92) to CR 415 (Tomoka Farms Rd)
widening PE ‐ $185,655 – FY 16/17; ROW ‐ $9,863,891‐ FY 18/19 through FY 21/22; ENV ‐ $1,500,000 – FY 16/17
CST ‐ $23.0 million (2017)
$37.5 CST cost estimate from CFLRoads (2017)
6 4355611 P14r‐203‐01
Old Kings Road Extension ‐Phase II
Matanzas Woods Pkwy to Old Kings Rd
new road construction CST ‐ $3,782,318 ‐
FY 18/19
‐ ‐ $5,600,000 FULLY‐FUNDED
7 4271181 and
4271182
P14r‐204‐01
Commerce Pkwy Connector Road – new 2 lane roadway
SR 100 to US 1 new road construction
CST ‐ $4,073,000 (2015)
$5,372,000 $694,000 remaining in LAP to apply toward CST; 60% plans w/ revised cost estimate expected June 2015
8 4336751 P14r‐205‐01
Matanzas Woods Pkwy – (west) – widen to 4 lanes
US 1 to I‐95 southbound ramps widening PE ‐ $1,903,000 ‐FY 18/19
ROW ‐ $183,000; ENV ‐ $28,000; CST ‐ $12,653,000; CEI ‐ $1,265,000
$16,032,000 Cost estimates per Table 1, Palm Coast FY 14/15 ‐ FY 18/19 FDOT 5‐Yr Work Program Project Priorities
9 SR 600/SR15 (US 17/92) –Emerging SIS
SR 472 to SR 15A (Taylor Rd) not yet determined
‐ ‐ ROW ‐ $3,000,000CST ‐ $27,000,000
$30,000,000
10 LPGA Blvd ‐ widen to 3 lanes SR 5A (Nova Rd) to SR 5/US 1 widening ‐ ‐ ROW ‐ $3,500,000CST ‐ $9,000,000
$12,500,000
11 Howland Blvd ‐ widen to 4lanes
Providence Blvd to Elkcam Blvd widening ‐ ‐ ROW ‐ $2,500,000CST ‐ $11,820,000
$14,320,000
12 North Entrance DeLand Airport (Industrial Park)
Industrial Park to SR 11 new road ‐ ‐ CST ‐ $970,000 $970,000
61
DRAF
T
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Regionally Significant, Non‐SIS Roadway Projects – Continued…
Pg 5
Priority Rank2
FDOT FM#
R2CTPO Project# Project Name Project Limits Project Type
Programmed Phase(s) Needed Phase(s)
Estimated Total Project Cost Comments
13 4289471 SR 40 ‐ widen to 6 lanes Williamson Blvd to Breakaway Trails
widening PD&E ‐ $5,881 – FY 16/17
PE ‐ $2.13 million, ENV ‐ $0.13, ROW ‐ $7.43 million, CST ‐ $22.99 million,
Also on SIS Projects List
14 SR 100 – widen to 6 lanes Old Kings Rd to Belle Terre Pkwy
widening ‐ ‐ ROW ‐ $3.17 millionCST ‐ $31.70 million
$34,870,000 Also on SIS Projects List
15 SR 442 Extension SR 442 to SR 415 PD&E for new road
‐ ‐ PD&E ‐ $10,000,000 $10,000,000
Projects which are ranked one through five on the List of Prioritized Regionally Significant, Non‐SIS Roadway Projects will remain in their current spot or move to the next available higher spot until they are completed and drop out of the Work Program.
62
DRAF
T
Pg 13
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects
DRAFT 5/9/17
Tier "A" – Projects with One or More Phases Funded
Priority Rank
FDOT FM#
R2CTPO Project# Project Name Project Limits
Project Type
Project Sponsor Programmed Phase(s)
Needed Phase(s)
Estimated Total Project Cost
Local Match % Comments
‐‐ 4354871 P13w‐103‐01 Flagler Av Sidewalk 12th St to Park Av Sidewalk Edgewater PE ‐ $4,312 ‐ FY 16/17; CST ‐ $416,830 ‐ FY 17/18
‐‐ $457,945 10% FULLY‐FUNDED
‐‐ 4355351 P11p‐113‐01 Forrest Hills Connector
Old Tomoka Rd to Scottdale Dr
Trail Ormond Beach
PE ‐ $1,281 ‐ FY 2016/17; CST ‐ $589,288 FY 17/18
‐‐ $645,692 10% FULLY‐FUNDED
‐‐ 4355391 P13w‐110‐01 N. Spruce Creek Rd Sidewalk
Nova Rd to Angelina Ct
Sidewalk Port Orange
PE ‐ $74,355 ‐ FY 16/17; CST ‐ $404,595 FY 18/19
‐‐ $478,158 10% FULLY‐FUNDED
‐‐ 4398661 P14‐104‐01 Halifax River/East Coast Greenway Trail
Wilder Bv to Shady Place
Trail Daytona Beach
PE – 101,000 ‐ FY 16/17CST ‐ 1$400,000 ‐ FY 17/18
‐‐ $525,517 10% FULLY‐FUNDED
‐‐ 4364341 P14n‐601‐01 Seminole/Volusia Gap
Wayside Park to (Seminole County) Spring to Spring Trail (Volusia County)
Trail Volusia County
CST ‐ $2,572,266 ‐ FY 16/17$25,675 ‐ FY 17/18
‐‐ $2,099,356 0% FULLY‐FUNDED
‐‐ 4106761 P14n‐605‐01 Black Bear Scenic Trail
SR 35 (Marion County) to US 17 (Volusia County)
Trail Volusia County
PD&E ‐ $4,620 ‐ FY 16/17 PE, CST TBD 0%
‐‐ 4355381 P13p‐109‐01 W. French Av Shared Use Path
Spring to Spring Trail to Valentine Park
Trail Orange City PE ‐ $19,299 ‐ FY 16/17 ROW; CST TBD 10%
‐‐ 4302172 P10p‐155‐01 Alabama Av Trail Minnesota Av to US 92
Trail DeLand CST ‐ $1,344,112 ‐ FY 19/20 ‐‐ $1,344,112 0%
‐‐ 4390371 P15p‐101‐01 Beville Rd Shared Use Path
Williamson Bv to Clyde Morris Bv
Trail Daytona Beach
PE ‐ $131,800 ‐ FY 16/17CST ‐ 1$964,030 ‐ FY 2020/21
‐‐ $1,095,830 0% FULLY‐FUNDED
‐‐ 4154348 P14e‐160‐01 East Central Regional Rail Trail (ECRRT)
Guise Rd to Gobbler’s Lodge Rd
Trail Volusia County
CST ‐ $$5,003,500 ‐ FY 17/18 ‐‐ $5,003,500 10% FULLY‐FUNDED
‐‐ 4390391 P10e‐121‐01 Spring to Spring Trail Detroit Terrace to US 17‐92
Trail Volusia County
PE ‐ $299,271 ‐ FY 16/17 ROW, CST TBD 10%
63
DRAF
T
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects
Pg 14
Priority Rank
FDOT FM#
R2CTPO Project# Project Name Project Limits
Project Type
Project Sponsor Programmed Phase(s)
Needed Phase(s)
Estimated Total Project Cost
Local Match % Comments
‐‐ 4102511 P10e‐122‐01 US 17 Trail W. Baxter St to SR 40
Trail Volusia County
PE, ROW,CST ‐‐ TBD 0% FULLY‐FUNDED Included in roadway widening project
‐‐ 4398741 Spring to Spring Trail Lake Beresford Park to Grand Av
Trail Volusia County
PE ‐ $751,000 ‐ FY 16/17 CST TBD 0% SUN Trail
‐‐ 4390571 Nova Rd Trail Bellevue Av to South St
Trail Daytona Beach
CST ‐ $298,116 ‐ FY FY 16/17 ‐‐ $298,116 10%
‐‐ 4398691 Halifax River Greenway Trail
Marina Point Dr to Orange Av
Trail Daytona Beach
PE ‐ $101,000 ‐ FY 16/17; CST ‐ $450,000 ‐ FY 17/18
‐‐ $551,000 0% FULLY‐FUNDED SUN Trail
‐‐ 4399711 Freemont Av Sidewalk
Niles St to US 1 Sidewalk Daytona Beach
CST (RR Xing Only) ‐ $350,000 – FY 16/17
PE, CST for sidewalk segments
‐‐ 4398771 US 17 Trail Washington Av to Palmetto Av
Trail Pierson PE ‐ $301,000 ‐ FY 17/18 ‐‐ $1,424,240 0% FULLY‐FUNDED SUN Trail
‐‐ 4398651 Riverwalk Shared Use Path
US 1 from Canal St to Beville Rd
Trail Port Orange
PD&E Study ‐ $1,510,000; PE ‐ $4,000,000 – FY 18/19
CST $5,510,000 0% SUN Trail
‐‐ 4408481 Deltona Lakes/Spirit Elem Sidewalks
[multiple limits] Sidewalk Deltona PE ‐ $15,901 ‐ FY 17/18 CST TBD 10%
‐‐ 4391951 Spring to Spring Connector Trail
Spring to Spring Trail to US 17‐92
Trail DeBary PE ‐ $25,000 ‐ FY 16/17; CST ‐ $225,000 ‐ FY 18/19
‐‐ $250,000 0% FULLY‐FUNDED Coast to Coast Trail
‐‐ 4398681 Halifax River Greenway Trail
Bellevue to Marina Point Dr
Trail Daytona Beach
PE ‐ $66,000 ‐ FY 16/17; CST ‐ $450,000 ‐ FY 17/18
‐‐ $516,000 0% FULLY‐FUNDED SUN Trail
‐‐ 4408521 Tomoka Elementary Connector Sidewalk
Main Trail to Granada Bv
Sidewalk Ormond Beach
PE ‐ $28,400 ‐ FY 17/18 CST TBD 10%
‐‐ 4408531 Williamson Bv/Hand Av Pedestrian Improvements
Hand Av to Regal Theater Driveway
Sidewalk Ormond Beach
PE ‐ $28,400 CST TBD 10%
64
DRAF
T
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects
Pg 15
Priority Rank
FDOT FM#
R2CTPO Project# Project Name Project Limits
Project Type
Project Sponsor Programmed Phase(s)
Needed Phase(s)
Estimated Total Project Cost
Local Match % Comments
‐‐ 4409061 Navy Canal Trail Museum Bv to Clyde Morris Bv
Trail Daytona Beach
PE ‐ $48,500; CST ‐ $250,570 ‐‐ $299,070 10% FULLY‐FUNDED
‐‐ 4409411 Tomoka State Park Trail
Sanchez Park to Tomoka State Park
Trail Ormond Beach
PE ‐ $87,000 CST TBD 10%
‐‐ 4408541 Lakeview Bv Trail Matanzas Parkway to London Dr
Trail Palm Coast CST ‐ $563,771 ‐‐ $563,771 10% FULLY‐FUNDED
65
DRAF
T
Pg 16
Tier "B" – Projects Ready for Funding
Priority Ranking
R2CTPO Project
# Project Name Project Limits Project Type Sponsor
Needed Phase(s)
Estimated Total Project
Cost Local
Match % Year
Submitted Project Score Comments
1 P15w‐101‐01
N. Orange/E. Graves Av Sidewalks French Av to University Av/Thorpe Av to Leavitt Av
Sidewalk Orange City
PE ‐ $56,587; CST ‐ $185,665 (2015)
$241,952 10% 2015 87 Protected Status
2 Providence Bv Shared Use Path Spring to Spring Trail to Alexander Dr and Tivoli Dr to Joyner Dr
Trail Deltona PE ‐ $284,256; CST ‐ $1,421,281 (2017)
$1,918,729 10% 2017 90.25
3 East ISB Beachside Corridor Improvement Plan US 92 Bridge to SR A1A
Sidewalk Daytona Beach
PE ‐ $750,000; ROW ‐ $20,000,000; CST ‐ $6,000,000 (2017)
$27,500,000 10% 2017 85.75
4 Coast to Coast Trail Wayfinding Signage Improvements
Lake Monroe Park to Rotary Park
Signage Volusia County
PE/CST ‐ $150,000 (2017)
$150,000 10% 2017 82
5 W. French Av Sidewalk and Bike Lane N. Carpenter Av to Valentine Park
Sidewalk and Bike Lane
Orange City
CST ‐ $579,083 (2017)
CST $579,083 10% 2017 76.75 This project replaces FM #4354991.
6 Center Av, Phase 1 Sidewalk LPGA Bv to Flomich St
Sidewalk Holly Hill PE ‐ $207,208; CST ‐ $664,026 (2017)
$937,667 10% 2017 76
7 Ormond Beach Downtown Crosswalk RRFB Southside of SR 40 to Northside of SR 40
RRFB Ormond Beach
PE ‐ $10,000; CST ‐ $36,750 (2017)
$52,750 0% 2017 75.25
8 P14w‐103‐01
Flomich St Sidewalk Nova Rd to Decatur St
Sidewalk Holly Hill PE ‐ $87,110 ROW ‐ $79,050 CST ‐ $340,729 (2016)
$506,889 10% 2014 75
9 P11e‐126‐01
SR A1A National Scenic & Historic Coastal Byway Beautification, Phase 1
N. 10th St to S. 10th St
Hardscaping/
Flagler Beach
PE ‐ ; CST ‐ TBD 10% 2011 75 To be completed in the reconstruction of SR A1A
66
DRAF
T
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects
Pg 17
Priority Ranking
R2CTPO Project
# Project Name Project Limits Project Type Sponsor
Needed Phase(s)
Estimated Total Project
Cost Local
Match % Year
Submitted Project Score Comments
10 15th St Sidewalk Nova Rd to Center Av
Sidewalk Holly Hill PE ‐ $170,700; CST ‐ $542,304 (2017)
$767,234 10% 2017 74.25
11 SR A1A Pedestrian Safety Improvements [multiple locations] Crosswalks
Ormond Beach
PE ‐ $18,000; CST ‐ $120,000 (2017)
$144,000 10% 2017 73.50
12 P15w‐102‐01
S. Holly/E. Lansdowne Av Sidewalks Graves Av to Blue Springs Av/Volusia Av to Orange Av
Sidewalk Orange City
PE – $101,294 CST ‐ $289,412 (2016)
$492,883 10% 2015 72
13 TBD Halifax River/East Coast Greenway Trail Orange Av to Intl. Speedway Bv
Trail Daytona Beach
PE ‐ $55,000; CST ‐ $385,500 CEI ‐ $77,000 (2016)
$517,000 10% 2016 70.67
14 Graham Swamp Trail Gap, Phase 2 Lehigh Trail to Graham Swamp Trail head
Trail Palm Coast
PE ‐ $350,000; CST ‐ $250,000 (2017)
$3,100,000 10% 2017 66.75
15 TBD Reed Canal Rd Shared Use Path Nova Rd to Ridgewood Av
Trail South Daytona
PE ‐ $725,608; CST‐TBD (2016)
TBD 10% 2016 66.33
16 P15w‐103‐01
US 1 Sidewalk Airport Rd to Wilmette Av
Sidewalk Ormond Beach
PE ‐ $28,000 CST ‐ $253,000 (2015)
$281,000 10% 2015 65
17 P14e‐102‐01
Lehigh Trailhead At Palm Coast Tennis Center
Trailhead Palm Coast
PE ‐ $100,000; CST ‐ TBD (2016)
TBD 10% 2014 64.38
18 P14e‐103‐01
Derbyshire Park Trail and Sidewalks Internal to Derbyshire Park
Trail and Sidewalk
Daytona Beach
CST ‐ $458,736 (2014)
$458,736 10% 2014 63.5
19 P15w‐104‐01
Bunnell Elementary School Sidewalks [multiple limits] Sidewalk Bunnell PE ‐ $83,467 CST ‐ $417,333 (2015)
$500,800 10% 2015 57
67
DRAF
T
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects
Pg 18
Priority Ranking
R2CTPO Project
# Project Name Project Limits Project Type Sponsor
Needed Phase(s)
Estimated Total Project
Cost Local
Match % Year
Submitted Project Score Comments
20 P14w‐106‐01
Derbyshire Park Sidewalk Vine St to Nova Rd and Brentwood St to 5th St
Sidewalk Daytona Beach
CST ‐ $413,648 (2014)
$413,648 10% 2014 54
21 TBD SR 44 Median Improvements, Phase 2 Glencoe Rd to Sugarmill Dr
Landscaping and Median Improvements
New Smyrna Beach
PE ‐ $80,000; CST ‐ $548,000; CEI ‐ $20,000 (2015)
$648,000 10% 2015 52.75
22 P10e‐134‐01
Tarragona Way Sidewalk Australia St to Museum St
Sidewalk Daytona Beach
CST ‐ $300,894 (2014)
$300,894 10% 2006 35
68
DRAF
T
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects
Pg 19
Tier "C" – Projects Awaiting Feasibility Study Priority Ranking R2CTPO Project# Project Name Project Limits Project Type Sponsor Local Match % Year Submitted Project Score Comments
1 TBD Flomich St Sidewalk, Phase 2 Decatur St to Ridgewood Av Sidewalk Holly Hill 10% 2016 71.80
2 Ponce Inlet Mobility Project [multiple limits] Sidewalk Ponce Inlet 10% 2017 68
3 Turnbull Bay Road Trail Industrial Park Av to Fairgreen Av Trail New Smyrna Beach 10% 2017 59
4 S11w‐121‐01 SR 442 Sidewalk I‐95 to Air Park Rd Sidewalk Edgewater 10% 2016 57.83
5 Taylor Road Sidewalk Leaning Tree Place to Blue Lake Av Sidewalk DeLand 10% 2017 57.75
6 Madeline Av Sidewalk Clyde Morris Bv to Nova Rd Sidewalk Port Orange 10% 2017 57.50
7 S15w‐102‐01 Willow Run Bv Sidewalk Harms Way to Clyde Morris Bv Sidewalk Port Orange 10% 2015 57
8 Sugarmill Drive Trail NSB Multi‐Use Trail to Gibralter Bv Trail New Smyrna Beach 10% 2017 56.5
9 S15p‐107‐01 Magnolia Av Shared Use Path Reed Canal Rd to Beville Rd Trail South Daytona 10% 2015 56.3
10 South St Trail Turnbull Bay Rd to US 1 Trail New Smyrna Beach 10% 2017 56.25
11 S15w‐103‐01 Center Av Sidewalk, Phase 2 3rd St to LPGA Bv Sidewalk Holly Hill 10% 2015 55.7
12 S15p‐108‐01 Anastasia Dr Shared Use Path Reed Canal Rd to Big Tree Rd Trail South Daytona 10% 2015 52.3
13 Ocean Av Sidewalk S. Peninsula Av to S. Atlantic Av Sidewalk New Smyrna Beach 10% 2017 52.25
14 S14p‐108‐01 Volusia Gap US 17‐92 Bridge to Spring to Spring Trail Trail Volusia County 10% 2014 43
15 Art Center Bv Sidewalk Sundance Trail to US 1 Sidewalk New Smyrna Beach 10% 2017 44
16 S11w‐110‐01 Lambert Av Sidewalk Palm Dr to Lambert Cove Sidewalk Flagler Beach 10% 2016 35.5 TBD – to be determined
69
DRAF
T
Pg 20
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Transit Projects [DRAFT 5/9/17]
Priority Rank FDOT FM# R2CTPO Project# Project Name Project Limits Project Type Sponsor Programmed Phase(s) Needed Phase(s) Estimated Total Project Cost Comments
Note: Transit projects are typically identified by the designated recipient of transit funding. No transit projects have been identified at this time.
70
DRAF
T
Pg 21
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Transportation Planning Studies [DRAFT 5/9/17]
Priority Rank
FDOT FM#
R2CTPO Study ID# Study Name Study Limits Sponsor
Programmed (Year)
Estimated Total Study
CostYear
Submitted Score Comments 1 Mason Avenue Corridor Study from Riverside Dr to Williamson
Blvd Daytona Beach
‐ $75,000 2015 35.75 FDOT is committed to a “partnership”, but can’t initiate before FY 17/18.
2 SR 44 & Beresford Avenue Extension from Kepler Rd to SR 44 DeLand ‐ $100,000 2015 34.88
LPGA Blvd Corridor Management Plan LPGA Blvd from US 92 to SR 5A (Nova Rd)
Volusia County
‐ 2017 33.56
3 Beachside Neighborhood Pedestrian Safety, Mobility & Access
beachside in Daytona Beach Daytona Beach
‐ $75,000 2015 32.50
4 Ft Florida Road Planning Study US 17 DeBary ‐ $75,000 2016 31.83
5 DeBary Village Center Corridor Improvement Study
from Highbanks Rd at US 17‐92 to Plantation Rd at US 17‐92.
DeBary ‐ TBD 2017 31.78
6 West extension of DeLand Greenway downtown area along the DeLand Greenway or Alabama Greenway to the Spring to Spring Trail between Minnesota Av south to Euclid Av
DeLand ‐ $25,000 to $55,000
2017 29.89
7 New Smyrna Beach Trolley Feasibility Study City‐wide New Smyrna Beach
‐ $50,000 2016 27.67
8 New Smyrna Beach US 1 Complete Streets South city limit to north city limit
New Smyrna Beach
‐ $64,000 2016 27.50
9 Flagler Beach Multi‐Modal Hub Study City‐wide Flagler Beach
‐ $150,000 2017 25.44
10 Daytona Beach Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan
City‐wide Daytona Beach
‐ $115,000 2015 24.75
11 I‐95/ US 1 Interchange Modifications at SR 5/US 1 ‐ TBD 2016 (not scored)
SIS Needs List
71
DRAF
T
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Transportation Planning Studies
Pg 22
Priority Rank
FDOT FM#
R2CTPO Study ID# Study Name Study Limits Sponsor
Programmed (Year)
Estimated Total Study
CostYear
Submitted Score Comments 12 I‐95/LPGA Blvd Interchange Modifications at LPGA Blvd ‐ TBD 2016 (not
scored) SIS Needs List
13 I‐95/Pioneer Trail New Interchange at Pioneer Trail ‐ TBD 2016 (not scored)
Volusia County‐Funded Projects List
TBD – to be determined
72
DRAF
TPg 1
River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization
2016 2017 LIST OF PRIORITY PROJECTS Page
STRATEGIC INTERMODAL SYSTEM (SIS) PROJECTS ............................................................................................................................................................. 2
REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT, NON‐SIS ROADWAY PROJECTS ............................................................................................................................................... 4
TRAFFIC OPERATIONS, SAFETY, AND LOCAL INITIATIVES PROJECTS .................................................................................................................................. 7
BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN AND B/P LOCAL INITIATIVES PROJECTS ......................................................................................................................................... 20
TRANSIT PROJECTS ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 3031
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING STUDIES ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3132
73
DRAF
TPg 2
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Projects ADOPTED 6/22/16DRAFT 5/9/17
Priority Rank1 FDOT FM#
R2CTPO Project# Project Name Project Limits Project Type Programmed Phase(s) Needed Phase(s)
Estimated Total Project Cost Comments
1 4084642 P12s‐202‐01
I‐4 widening to 10 Lanes (1‐4 Beyond the Ultimate)
Volusia/Seminole county line to 1/2 mile east of SR 472
widening PE ‐$6,400,000$1,228,818 ‐ FY 14/1516/17 and FY 15/16; ENV ‐ $150,270 ‐ FY 17/18
ROW ‐ $46.355 million;CST ‐ $372.07 million (all costs are 2014)
$424.8 million To be funded as a public‐private partnership using tolled lanes
SR 472 ‐ widen from 4 lanes to 6
Graves Av to Kentucky/MLK Blvd
widening CST ‐ $40.48 million, $40.48 million To be undertaken as part of the I‐4 Beyond the Ultimate Project; also on Regionally‐Significant, Non‐SIS List
Saxon Blvd Ramp/Roadway
I‐4 to Normandy Blvd
CST ‐ $35.38 million $35.38 million To be undertaken as part of the I‐4 Beyond the Ultimate Project
Rhode Island Extension Veterans Memorial Pkwy to Normandy Blvd
CST ‐ $34.87 million $34.87 million To be undertaken as part of the I‐4 Beyond the Ultimate Project
2 4102511 P10s‐205‐01
SR 15 (US 17) ‐ widen to 4 lanes
Ponce de Leon Blvd to SR 40
widening PE ‐ $2,050,000 $455,410 ‐ FY 14/1516/17; ROW ‐ $11,005,890$ 13,691,472 ‐ FY 14/15FY 16/17 through FY 17/18FY 20/21; RRU ‐ $3,000,000 ‐ FY 20/21; CST ‐ $50,186,043 ‐ FY 20/21
CST ‐ $33.4 million (plus $5‐6 million for multi‐use trail) (all costs are 2014)
$55.36$76.7 million
FULLY‐FUNDED
3 4289471 P11s‐201‐01
SR 40 ‐ widen to 6 lanes Williamson to Breakaway Tr
widening PD&E ‐ $583,917 –FY 10/11 through FY 14/15
PE ‐ $2.13 million, ENV ‐$0.13, ROW ‐ $7.43 million, CST ‐ $22.99 million, (all costs are 2014)
$33 .26 million (2014)
Also on Regionally‐Significant, Non‐SIS List
4 2408371 P10s‐206‐01
SR 40 ‐ widen to 4 lanes Cone Rd to SR 11 widening PE/ENV ‐ $6,560,991 –FY 12 through FY 15
ROW ‐ $2.3 million,CST ‐ $41.5 million (all costs are 2015)
$50.36 million
1 Projects which are ranked one through five on the List of Prioritized SIS Roadway Projects will remain in their current spot or move to the next available higher spot until they are completed and drop out of the Work Program.
74
DRAF
TPg 3
Priority Rank1 FDOT FM#
R2CTPO Project# Project Name Project Limits Project Type Programmed Phase(s) Needed Phase(s)
Estimated Total Project Cost Comments
5 2408361 P10s‐207‐01
SR 40 ‐ widen to 4 lanes SR 11 to SR 15 (US 17)
widening PE ‐ $3,307,549 – FY 13/14 ENV ‐ $400,000$4,500,000 ‐ FY 14/15FY 16/17 ROW ‐ $5,246,000 ‐ FY 21/22
ROW ‐ $7.5 million,CST ‐ $30.4$35.0 million; (all costs are 20152017)
$41.6$48.5 million (20152017)
6 SR 100 ‐ widen to 6 lanes
Old Kings Rd to Belle Terre Pkwy
widening ROW ‐ $3.17 million; CST ‐ $31.70 million
$34.87 million (2015)
Also on Regionally Significant, Non‐SIS Projects List
75
DRAF
T
Pg 4
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Regionally Significant, Non‐SIS Projects ADOPTED 6/22/16 DRAFT 5/9/17
Priority Rank2
FDOT FM#
R2CTPO Project# Project Name Project Limits Project Type Programmed Phase(s) Needed Phase(s)
Estimated Total Project Cost Comments
1 US 1 intersections (from the US 1 AIS)
intersection improvements
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
4371211 SR 5 (US 1) at Park Av SR 5 (US 1) at Park Av ‐ ‐ PE‐ $200,000$372,000 ‐FY 19/20
CST TBD Southbound right turn lane added as part of FM# 4268891, US 1 Median Modifications); PE for signal system upgrade to improve intersection operations is programmed in FY 19/20
2409925 P10r‐210‐05
SR 5 (US 1) at Canal St Intersection Improvements
SR 5 (US 1) at Canal St ‐ ‐ PE ‐ $107,342 – FY 16/17; ROW ‐ $5,718 – FY 16/17; RRU ‐ $605,264 – FY CST ‐ $4,360,519$4,887,349 ‐ FY 18/19
‐ ‐ $5,862,9147,345,128 FULLY‐FUNDED
2409927 P10r‐210‐08
SR 5 (US 1) at Reed Canal Rd Intersection Improvements
SR 5 (US 1) at Reed Canal Rd ‐ ‐ PE ‐ $7,793 – FY 16/17; ROW ‐ $15,152 – FY 16/17; CST ‐ $1,034,977$1,279,781 ‐ FY 17/1816/17 through FY 17/18
‐ ‐ $1,531,349$2,485,713 FULLY‐FUNDED
2409928 P10r‐210‐06
SR 5 (US 1) at Big Tree Rd Intersection Improvements
SR 5 (US 1) at Big Tree Rd Intersection
‐ ‐ PE ‐ $10,389 – FY 16/17; ROW ‐ $17,171 – FY 16/17; CST ‐ $687,829$635,530 ‐ FY 17/18
‐ ‐ $961,925$1,237,336 FULLY‐FUNDED
2 4081781 P10r‐212‐01
SR 483 (Clyde Morris Blvd) widen to 6 lanes
SR 400 (Beville Rd) to SR 600 (US 92 ‐ International Speedway Blvd)
widening PE ‐ $13,934 – FY 16/17; ROW ‐ $19,465,853$24,673,760 ‐ FY 17/18 through FY 19/20FY 21/22
CST ‐ $30.6 $29.1million (20152017)
$66,400,000$70.1 CST cost matches CFLRoads info last updated 20152017
2 Projects which are ranked one through five on the List of Prioritized Regionally Significant, Non‐SIS Roadway Projects will remain in their current spot or move to the next available higher spot until they are completed and drop out of the Work Program.
76
DRAF
T
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Regionally Significant, Non‐SIS Roadway Projects – Continued…
Pg 5
Priority Rank2
FDOT FM#
R2CTPO Project# Project Name Project Limits Project Type Programmed Phase(s) Needed Phase(s)
Estimated Total Project Cost Comments
3 4159641 P14r‐202‐01
Old Kings Rd widen from 2 lanes to 4
Palm Coast Pkwy to Forest Grove Dr
widening ROW ‐ $60,000 ‐FY 14/15
CST ‐ $13,250,000 (2014); CEI ‐ $1,600,000 (2014)
$17,260,000 Cost estimates per Table 1, Palm Coast FY 14/15 ‐ FY 2018/19 FDOT 5‐Yr Work Program Project Priorities
4 ‐ ‐ P11r‐208‐01
SR 44 – Miscellaneous upgrades to improve access to DeLand SunRail
between SR 15A and SunRail Station
misc. upgrades to improve access to the SunRail station
‐ ‐ ROW ‐ $1.74,CST ‐ $17.36
$19,100,000 SR 44 corridor study completed
5 4226271 P11R‐209‐01
US 92 – widen from 4 to 6 lanes
I‐4 EB Ramps to SR 600 (US 92) to CR 415 (Tomoka Farms Rd)
widening PE ‐ $185,655 – FY 16/17; ROW ‐ $6,185,020$9,863,891 ‐ FY 18/19 through FY 19/20FY 21/22; ENV ‐ $1,500,000 – FY 16/17
CST ‐ $25.427 $23.0 million (20132017)
$18,600,000$37.5 CST cost estimate from CFLRoads (2017); FDOT to provide updated estimate by mid June 2015
6 4355611 P14r‐203‐01
Old Kings Road Extension ‐Phase II
Matanzas Woods Pkwy to Old Kings Rd
new road construction
ROW ‐ $600,000 ‐FY 15/16, CST ‐ $4,500,000$3,782,318 ‐ FY 18/19
‐ ‐ $5,600,000 FULLY‐FUNDED
7 4271181 and
4271182
P14r‐204‐01
Commerce Pkwy Connector Road – new 2 lane roadway
SR 100 to US 1 new road construction
PD&E ‐ $488,000PE ‐ $811,000
CST ‐ $4,073,000 (2015)
$5,372,000 $694,000 remaining in LAP to apply toward CST; 60% plans w/ revised cost estimate expected June 2015
8 4336751 P14r‐205‐01
Matanzas Woods Pkwy –(west) – widen to 4 lanes
US 1 to I‐95 southbound ramps
widening PE ‐ $1,903,000 ‐FY 17/18FY 18/19
ROW ‐ $183,000; ENV ‐ $28,000; CST ‐ $12,653,000;CEI ‐ $1,265,000
$16,032,000 Cost estimates per Table 1, Palm Coast FY 14/15 ‐ FY 18/19 FDOT 5‐Yr Work Program Project Priorities
9 SR 600/SR15 (US 17/92) –Emerging SIS
SR 472 to SR 15A (Taylor Rd) not yet determined
‐ ‐ ROW ‐ $3,000,000CST ‐ $27,000,000
$30,000,000
10 LPGA Blvd ‐ widen to 3 lanes SR 5A (Nova Rd) to SR 5/US 1
widening ‐ ‐ ROW ‐ $3,500,000CST ‐ $9,000,000
$12,500,000
11 Howland Blvd ‐ widen to 4lanes
Providence Blvd to Elkcam Blvd
widening ‐ ‐ ROW ‐ $2,500,000CST ‐ $11,820,000
$14,320,000
77
DRAF
T
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Regionally Significant, Non‐SIS Roadway Projects – Continued…
Pg 6
Priority Rank2
FDOT FM#
R2CTPO Project# Project Name Project Limits Project Type Programmed Phase(s) Needed Phase(s)
Estimated Total Project Cost Comments
12 North Entrance DeLand Airport (Industrial Park)
Industrial Park to SR 11 new road ‐ ‐ CST ‐ $970,000 $970,000
13 4289471 SR 40 ‐ widen to 6 lanes Williamson Blvd to Breakaway Trails
widening PD&E ‐ $583,917$5,881– FY 10/11 through FY 14/15FY 16/17
PE ‐ $2.13 million, ENV ‐ $0.13, ROW ‐ $7.43 million, CST ‐ $22.99 million,
PD&E ‐ $583,917 – FY 10/11 through
FY 14/15
Also on SIS Projects List
14 SR 100 – widen to 6 lanes Old Kings Rd to Belle Terre Pkwy
widening ‐ ‐ ROW ‐ $3.17million CST ‐ $31.70 million
$34,870,000 Also on SIS Projects List
15 SR 442 Extension SR 442 to SR 415 PD&E for new road
‐ ‐ PD&E ‐$10,000,000
$10,000,000
Projects which are ranked one through five on the List of Prioritized Regionally Significant, Non‐SIS Roadway Projects will remain in their current spot or move to the next available higher spot until they are completed and drop out of the Work Program.
78
DRAF
T
Pg 20
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects
DRAFT 5/11/165/4/175/9/17
Tier "A" – Projects with One or More Phases Funded
Priority Rank
FDOT FM#
R2CTPO Project# Project Name Project Limits
Project Type
Project Sponsor Programmed Phase(s)
Needed Phase(s)
Estimated Total Project Cost
Local Match % Comments
‐‐ 4354871 P13w‐103‐01 Flagler Av Sidewalk 12th St to Park Av Sidewalk Edgewater PE ‐ $41,115 FY 2015/16$4,312 ‐ FY 16/17; CST ‐ $416,830 ‐ FY 17/18
‐‐ $457,945 10% FULLY‐FUNDED
‐‐ 4355361 P13w‐106‐01 Victoria Gardens Bv Sidewalk
Clyde Morris Bv to Appleview Way
Sidewalk Port Orange
PE ‐ $56,404 FY 2015/16; CST ‐ $153,843 FY 2018/19
‐‐ $244,778 10% FULLY‐FUNDED
‐‐ 4355351 P11p‐113‐01 Forrest Hills Connector
Old Tomoka Rd to Scottdale Dr
Trail Ormond Beach
PE ‐ $58,704 FY 2015/16$1,281 ‐ FY 2016/17; CST ‐ $589,288 FY 2016/17FY 17/18
‐‐ $645,692 10% FULLY‐FUNDED
‐‐ 4355321 P11w‐102‐01 Big Tree Rd Shared Use Path
James St to Nova Rd
Trail South Daytona
CST ‐ $577,500 FY 16/17 ‐‐ $577,500 10% FULLY‐FUNDED
‐‐ 4355391 P13w‐110‐01 N. Spruce Creek Rd Sidewalk
Nova Rd to Angelina Ct
Sidewalk Port Orange
PE ‐ $75,563$74,355 ‐ FY 16/17; CST ‐ $404,595 FY 17/18FY 18/19
‐‐ $478,158 10% FULLY‐FUNDED
‐‐ 435881 P13w‐112‐01 Magnolia St Sidewalk 6th St to 10th St Sidewalk New Smyrna Beach
CST – 57,928 FY 16/17 ‐‐ $57,928 10% FULLY‐FUNDED
‐‐ 43613914398661
P14‐104‐01 Halifax River/East Coast Greenway Trail
Wilder Bv to Shady Place
Trail Daytona Beach
PE – 101,000 ‐ FY 16/17CST ‐ $525,517 FY 18/19$400,000 ‐ FY 17/18
‐‐ $525,517 10% FULLY‐FUNDED (from Regional Trail Project List)
‐‐ 4364341 P14n‐601‐01 Seminole/Volusia Gap
Wayside Park to (Seminole County) Spring to Spring Trail (Volusia County)
Trail Volusia County
CST ‐ $2,572,266 ‐ FY 16/17$1,379,067$25,675 ‐ FY 17/18
‐‐ $2,099,356 0% FULLY‐FUNDED (from Regional Trail Project List)
‐‐ 4106761 P14n‐605‐01 Black Bear Scenic Trail
SR 35 (Marion County) to US 17 (Volusia County)
Trail Volusia County
PD&E ‐ $4,620 FY 15/16$4,620 ‐ FY 16/17
PE, CST TBD 0% (from Regional Trail Project List)
79
DRAF
T
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects
Pg 21
Priority Rank
FDOT FM#
R2CTPO Project# Project Name Project Limits
Project Type
Project Sponsor Programmed Phase(s)
Needed Phase(s)
Estimated Total Project Cost
Local Match % Comments
‐‐ 4354991 P13w‐104‐01 W. French Av Sidewalk
N. Carpenter Av to Valentine Park
Sidewalk Orange City PE ‐ $59,338 FY 15/16 CST TBD 10%
‐ FY1‐‐ 4355001 P13w‐105‐01 McDonald Rd Sidewalk
Sauls Rd to 6th St Sidewalk Port Orange
PE ‐ $2,297 FY 15/16 CST TBD 10% FULLY‐FUNDED
‐‐ 4353814355381
P13p‐109‐01 W. French Av Shared Use Path
Spring to Spring Trail to Valentine Park
Trail Orange City PE ‐ $494,419 FY 15/16; ROW ‐ $4,449 FY 16/17$19,299 ‐ FY 16/17
ROW; CST TBD 10%
‐‐ 4398671 TBD Halifax River/East Coast Greenway Trail
Shady Place to Bellevue Av
Trail Daytona Beach
CST ‐ $510,000 FY 16/17 ‐‐ $510,000 10% FULLY‐FUNDED (from TAP List)
‐‐ 43021714302172
P10p‐155‐01 Alabama Av Trail Minnesota Av to US 92
Trail DeLand PECST ‐ $1,344,112 ‐ FY 19/20 CST‐‐ TBD$1,344,112 0% Design Underway
‐‐ 4302172 P10p‐156‐01 Alabama Av Trail US 92 to Sperling Sports Complex
Trail DeLand CST ‐ $1,344,112 FY 19/20 ‐‐ $1,344,112 0% FULLY‐FUNDED
‐‐ 4390371 P15p‐101‐01 Beville Rd Shared Use Path
Williamson Bv to Clyde Morris Bv
Trail Daytona Beach
PE ‐ $131,800 ‐ FY 16/17CST ‐ $131,800 FY 17/18$964,030 ‐ FY 2020/21
‐‐ $131,800$1,095,830 10% FULLY‐FUNDED (from Tier B)
‐‐ 4154348 P14e‐160‐01 East Central Regional Rail Trail (ECRRT)
Guise Rd to Gobbler’s Lodge Rd
Trail Volusia County
CST ‐ $4,432,301 FY 18/19$5,003,500 ‐ FY 17/18
‐‐ $4,432,301$5,003,500 10% FULLY‐FUNDED (from TAP List)
‐‐ 4154349 P14e‐160‐02 ECRRT Gobbler’s Lodge Rd to Maytown Spur
Trail Volusia County
$730,327 FY 16/17 ‐‐ $730,327 10% FULLY‐FUNDED (from TAP List)
‐‐ 4154343 P10e‐160‐04 ECRRT Brevard County Line to Cow Creek
Trail Volusia County
CST ‐ $2,989,804 FY 15/16$2,512,308 FY 16/17
‐‐ $2,989,804 10% FULLY‐FUNDED (from TAP List)
‐‐ 4390391 P10e‐121‐01 Spring to Spring Trail Detroit Terrace to US 17‐92
Trail Volusia County
PE ‐ $396,000 FY 17/18$299,271 ‐ FY 16/17
ROW, CST TBD 10% (from TAP List)
‐‐ 4102511 P10e‐122‐01 US 17 Trail W. Baxter St to SR 40
Trail Volusia County
PE, ROW,CST CST‐‐ TBD 0% FULLY‐FUNDED (from TAP List) Included in roadway widening project
4398741 Spring to Spring Trail Lake Beresford Park to Grand Av
Trail Volusia County
PE ‐ $751,000 ‐ FY 16/17 CST TBD 0% SUN Trail
80
DRAF
T
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects
Pg 22
Priority Rank
FDOT FM#
R2CTPO Project# Project Name Project Limits
Project Type
Project Sponsor Programmed Phase(s)
Needed Phase(s)
Estimated Total Project Cost
Local Match % Comments
4390571 Nova Rd Trail Bellevue Av to South St
Trail Daytona Beach
CST ‐ $298,116 ‐ FY FY 16/17 ‐‐ $298,116 10%
4398691 Halifax River Greenway Trail
Marina Point Dr to Orange Av
Trail Daytona Beach
PE ‐ $101,000 ‐ FY 16/17; CST ‐ $450,000 ‐ FY 17/18
‐‐ $551,000 0% FULLY‐FUNDED SUN Trail
4399711 Freemont Av Sidewalk
Niles St to US 1 Sidewalk Daytona Beach
CST (RR Xing Only) ‐ $350,000 – FY 16/17
PE, CST for sidewalk segments
4399721 North St Sidewalk Clyde Morris Bv to Nova Rd
Sidewalk Daytona Beach
CST ‐ $325,562 FY 16/17 $325,562 10%
4398771 US 17 Trail Washington Av to Palmetto Av
Trail Pierson PE ‐ $301,000 ‐ FY 17/18 ‐‐ $1,424,240 0% FULLY‐FUNDED SUN Trail
4398651 Riverwalk Shared Use Path
US 1 from Canal St to Beville Rd
Trail Port Orange
PD&E Study ‐ $1,510,000; PE ‐ $4,000,000 – FY 18/19
CST $5,510,000 0% SUN Trail
4408481 Deltona Lakes/Spirit Elem Sidewalks
[multiple limits] Sidewalk Deltona PE ‐ $15,901 ‐ FY 17/18 CST TBD 10%
4391951 Spring to Spring Connector Trail
Spring to Spring Trail to US 17‐92
Trail DeBary PE ‐ $25,000 ‐ FY 16/17; CST ‐ $225,000 ‐ FY 18/19
‐‐ $250,000 0% FULLY‐FUNDED Coast to Coast Trail
4398681 Halifax River Greenway Trail
Bellevue to Marina Point Dr
Trail Daytona Beach
PE ‐ $66,000 ‐ FY 16/17; CST ‐ $450,000 ‐ FY 17/18
‐‐ $516,000 0% FULLY‐FUNDED SUN Trail
4408521 Tomoka Elementary Connector Sidewalk
Main Trail to Granada Bv
Sidewalk Ormond Beach
PE ‐ $28,400 ‐ FY 17/18 CST TBD 10%
4408531 Williamson Bv/Hand Av Pedestrian Improvements
Hand Av to Regal Theater Driveway
Sidewalk Ormond Beach
PE ‐ $28,400 CST TBD 10%
4409061 Navy Canal Trail Museum Bv to Clyde Morris Bv
Trail Daytona Beach
PE ‐ $48,500; CST ‐ $250,570 ‐‐ $299,070 10% FULLY‐FUNDED
4409411 Tomoka State Park Trail
Sanchez Park to Tomoka State Park
Trail Ormond Beach
PE ‐ $87,000 CST TBD 10%
4408541 Lakeview Bv Trail Matanzas Parkway to London Dr
Trail Palm Coast CST ‐ $563,771 ‐‐ $563,771 10% FULLY‐FUNDED
81
DRAF
T
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects
Pg 23
Tier "B" – Projects Ready for Funding
Priority Ranking
R2CTPO Project
# Project Name Project Limits Project Type Sponsor
Needed Phase(s)
Estimated Total Project
Cost Local
Match % Year
Submitted Project Score Comments
1 P15w‐101‐01
N. Orange/E. Graves Av Sidewalks French Av to University Av/Thorpe Av to Leavitt Av
Sidewalk Orange City
PE ‐ $56,587; CST ‐ $185,665 (2015)
$241,952 10% 2015 87 Protected Status
2 P10e‐128‐01
Spring to Spring Trail, Segments 5 and 6 Lake Beresford Park to Minnesota Av
Trail Volusia County
PLN ‐ $515,500; PE ‐ $227,059; ROW; CST ‐ $1,740,789
TBD 10% 2010 85 Protected Status (from TAP List)Moved to Tier “A”
3 P14p‐101‐01
Nova Rd Trail Bellevue Av to South St
Trail Daytona Beach
CST ‐ $118,433 $118,433 10% 2014 80 Protected StatusMoved to Tier “A”
4 P14p‐102‐01
Halifax River/East Coast Greenway Trail Live Oak Av to Orange Av
Trail Daytona Beach
CST ‐ $60,904 $60,904 10% 2014 78 Protected Status Moved to Tier “A”
5 P10e‐130‐01
Spring to Spring Trail, Phase 7B Lemon St to King St Trail Volusia County
PE ‐ $162,752 (2013); CST ‐ $1,247,769 (2013)
$2,100,000 10% 2006 56 Protected Status (from TAP List)
P10e‐123‐01
Fremont Av Sidewalk Niles St to US 1 Sidewalk Daytona Beach
CST ‐ $439,631 (2014)
10% 2005 ‐‐
Protected Status (from TAP List)Moved to Tier “A”
8 P10e‐124‐01
North St Sidewalk Clyde Morris Bv to Nova Rd
Sidewalk Daytona Beach
CST ‐ $399,190 TBD 10% 2005 Protected Status (from TAP List)Moved to Tier “A”
92 PP12e‐101‐01
Flagler Beach Multimodal Hub S. Flagler Av business district
Multimodal
Flagler Beach
PE, CST TBD 10% 2012 81 Parking/Transit Stop/Transit Circulator/Bicycle Rentals
10 TBD US 17 Sidewalk Washington Av to Palmetto Av
Sidewalk Pierson PE ‐ $94,430; CST ‐ $472,148 (2016)
$614,983 10% 2016 79.4
82
DRAF
T
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects
Pg 24
Priority Ranking
R2CTPO Project
# Project Name Project Limits Project Type Sponsor
Needed Phase(s)
Estimated Total Project
Cost Local
Match % Year
Submitted Project Score Comments
11 P15p‐102‐01
Riverwalk Shared Use Path Dunlawton Av to Ocean Av
Trail Port Orange
PE ‐ $65,000; CST ‐ $341,218 (2016)
$406,218 10% 2014 77
12 TBD Deltona Lakes and Spirit Elem. Sidewalk Program [multiple limits] Sidewalk Deltona PE ‐ $149,010; CST ‐ $397,360 (2016)
$894,060 10% 2016 76.83
13 TBD Spring to Spring Connector Trail Spring to Spring Trail to US 17‐92
Trail DeBary PE ‐ $25,000; CST ‐ $225,000 (2016)
$250,000 10% 2016 76.67
14 TBD Halifax River/East Coast Greenway Bellevue Av to Live Oak Av
Trail Daytona Beach
PE ‐ $55,000; ROW ‐ $385,000CST ‐ $401,500 (2016)
$924,000 10% 2016 76
2 Providence Bv Shared Use Path Spring to Spring Trail to Alexander Dr and Tivoli Dr to Joyner Dr
Trail Deltona PE ‐ $284,256; CST ‐ $1,421,281 (2017)
$1,918,729 10% 2017 90.25
3 East ISB Beachside Corridor Improvement Plan US 92 Bridge to SR A1A
Sidewalk Daytona Beach
PE ‐ $750,000; ROW ‐ $20,000,000; CST ‐ $6,000,000 (2017)
$27,500,000 10% 2017 85.75
4 Coast to Coast Trail Wayfinding Signage Improvements
Lake Monroe Park to Rotary Park
Signage Volusia County
PE/CST ‐ $150,000 (2017)
$150,000 10% 2017 82
5 W. French Av Sidewalk and Bike Lane N. Carpenter Av to Valentine Park
Sidewalk and Bike Lane
Orange City
CST ‐ $579,083 (2017)
CST $579,083 10% 2017 76.75 This project replaces FM #4354991.
6 Center Av, Phase 1 Sidewalk LPGA Bv to Flomich St
Sidewalk Holly Hill PE ‐ $207,208; CST ‐ $664,026 (2017)
$937,667 10% 2017 76
83
DRAF
T
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects
Pg 25
Priority Ranking
R2CTPO Project
# Project Name Project Limits Project Type Sponsor
Needed Phase(s)
Estimated Total Project
Cost Local
Match % Year
Submitted Project Score Comments
7 Ormond Beach Downtown Crosswalk RRFB Southside of SR 40 to Northside of SR 40
RRFB Ormond Beach
PE ‐ $10,000; CST ‐ $36,750 (2017)
$52,750 0% 2017 75.25
158 P14w‐103‐01
Flomich St Sidewalk Nova Rd to Decatur St
Sidewalk Holly Hill PE ‐ $87,110 ROW ‐ $79,050 CST ‐ $340,729 (2016)
$506,889 10% 2014 75
169 P11e‐126‐01
SR A1A National Scenic & Historic Coastal Byway Beautification, Phase 1
N. 10th St to S. 10th St
Hardscaping/ landscaping
Flagler Beach
PE ‐ $75,000; CST ‐ $675,000
$750,000 (2011)TBD
10% 2011 75 To be completed in the reconstruction of SR A1A
17 TBD Tomoka Elementary Connector Sidewalk Main Trail to Granada Bv
Sidewalk Ormond Beach
PE ‐ $16,200 CST ‐ $108,000 CEI ‐ $10,800 (2016)
$135, 000 10% 2016 72.50
10 15th St Sidewalk Nova Rd to Center Av
Sidewalk Holly Hill PE ‐ $170,700; CST ‐ $542,304 (2017)
$767,234 10% 2017 74.25
11 SR A1A Pedestrian Safety Improvements [multiple locations] Crosswalks
Ormond Beach
PE ‐ $18,000; CST ‐ $120,000 (2017)
$144,000 10% 2017 73.50
1812 P15w‐102‐01
S. Holly/E. Lansdowne Av Sidewalks Graves Av to Blue Springs Av/Volusia Av to Orange Av
Sidewalk Orange City
PE – $101,294 CST ‐ $289,412 (2016)
$492,883 10% 2015 72
1913 TBD Halifax River/East Coast Greenway Trail Orange Av to Intl. Speedway Bv
Trail Daytona Beach
PE ‐ $55,000; CST ‐ $385,500 CEI ‐ $77,000 (2016)
$517,000 10% 2016 70.67
84
DRAF
T
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects
Pg 26
Priority Ranking
R2CTPO Project
# Project Name Project Limits Project Type Sponsor
Needed Phase(s)
Estimated Total Project
Cost Local
Match % Year
Submitted Project Score Comments
20 TBD Williamson Bv/Hand Av Pedestrian Improvements Hand Av to Regal Theater Driveway
Sidewalk, Crosswalk, Pedestrian Signals
Ormond Beach
PE ‐ $26,400 CST ‐ $176,00 CEI ‐ $17,600 (2016)
$220,000 10% 2016 68.50
21 P14e‐101‐01
Navy Canal/Museum Bv Trail Museum Bv to Clyde Morris Bv
Trail Daytona Beach
CST ‐ $225,973 $225,973 10% 2014 67.5 (from TAP List)
14 Graham Swamp Trail Gap, Phase 2 Lehigh Trail to Graham Swamp Trail head
Trail Palm Coast
PE ‐ $350,000; CST ‐ $250,000 (2017)
$3,100,000 10% 2017 66.75
2215 TBD Reed Canal Rd Shared Use Path Nova Rd to Ridgewood Av
Trail South Daytona
PE ‐ $725,608; CST‐TBD (2016)
TBD 10% 2016 66.33
2316 P15w‐103‐01
US 1 Sidewalk Airport Rd to Wilmette Av
Sidewalk Ormond Beach
PE ‐ $28,000 CST ‐ $253,000 (2015)
$281,000 10% 2015 65
2417 P14e‐102‐01
Lehigh Trailhead At Palm Coast Tennis Center
Trailhead Palm Coast
PE ‐ $100,000; CST ‐ TBD (2016)
TBD 10% 2014 64.38 (from TAP List)
2518 P14e‐103‐01
Derbyshire Park Trail and Sidewalks Internal to Derbyshire Park
Trail and Sidewalk
Daytona Beach
CST ‐ $458,736 (2014)
$458,736 10% 2014 63.5 (from TAP List)
26 P15p‐103‐31
NSB Multi‐Use Trail SR 44 to Gibraltar Bv
Trail New Smyrna Beach
PE ‐ $28,000 CST ‐ $253,000
$281,000 10% 2015 63 Removed by Project Sponsor
2719 P15w‐104‐01
Bunnell Elementary School Sidewalks [multiple limits] Sidewalk Bunnell PE ‐ $83,467 CST ‐ $417,333 (2015)
$500,800 10% 2015 57
28 P14p‐105‐01
Tomoka State Park Sidewalk Sanchez Park to Tomoka State Park
Sidewalk Ormond Beach
PE ‐ $86,000 CST ‐ $789,627
$875,626 10% 2014 55
2920 P14w‐106‐01
Derbyshire Park Sidewalk Vine St to Nova Rd and Brentwood St to 5th St
Sidewalk Daytona Beach
CST ‐ $413,648 (2014)
$413,648 10% 2014 54
85
DRAF
T
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects
Pg 27
Priority Ranking
R2CTPO Project
# Project Name Project Limits Project Type Sponsor
Needed Phase(s)
Estimated Total Project
Cost Local
Match % Year
Submitted Project Score Comments
30 P14p‐107‐01
Lakeview Bv Trail Matanzas Parkway to London Dr
Trail Palm Coast
CST ‐ $565,916 $565,916 10% 2014 53
3121 TBD SR 44 Median Improvements, Phase 2 Glencoe Rd to Sugarmill Dr
Landscaping and Median Improvements
New Smyrna Beach
PE ‐ $80,000; CST ‐ $548,000; CEI ‐ $20,000 (2015)
$648,000 10% 2015 52.75 (from TAP List)
3222 P10e‐134‐01
Tarragona Way Sidewalk Australia St to Museum St
Sidewalk Daytona Beach
CST ‐$300,984 $300,894 (2014)
TBD$300,894 10% 2006 35 (from TAP List)
86
DRAF
T
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects
Pg 28
Tier "C" – Projects Awaiting Feasibility Study Priority Ranking
R2CTPO Project# Project Name Project Limits Project Type Sponsor
Local Match %
Year Submitted
Project Score Comments
1 TBD Halifax River Trail Commonwealth Bv to Dunlawton Av
Trail Port Orange 10% 2016 78.80 SUN Trail;
2 TBD Thompson Creek Trail Division Av to Wilmette Av Trail Ormond Beach 10% 2016 75.75 Initial project application submitted in 2011
3 TBD NSB West Canal Bike‐Ped Study
W. Pine Av to S. Myrtle Av Trail New Smyrna Beach 10% 2016 74.60 SUN Trail;
4 TBD Port Orange Sidewalk Gaps [multiple limits] Sidewalk Port Orange 10% 2016 73.20 Sidewalk gaps in 5 separate locations
51 TBD Flomich St Sidewalk, Phase 2 Decatur St to Ridgewood Av
Sidewalk Holly Hill 10% 2016 71.80
6 TBD South Daytona Riverwalk South Daytona/Port Orange limit to Palmetto Av
Trail South Daytona 10% 2016 69.40 Tied with #7SUN Trail;
7 TBD 15th Sidewalk Nova Rd to Center Av Sidewalk Holly Hill 10% 2016 69.40 Tied with #6
8 TBD Oak Hill Sidewalk Osteen St to Sunrise Park Sidewalk Oak Hill 10% 2016 65.25
9 S14w‐105‐01
Highbanks Rd Sidewalk Simcoe St to Enterprise Rd Sidewalk DeBary 10% 2014 63
10 S14w‐106‐01
Center Av Sidewalk Flomich St to LPGA Bv Sidewalk Holly Hill 10% 2014 58.3
11 S15p‐106‐01
US 1 Shared Use Path Art Center Bv to Bayshore Dr
Trail New Smyrna Beach and Port Orange
10% 2015 58 SUN Trail;
2 Ponce Inlet Mobility Project [multiple limits] Sidewalk Ponce Inlet 10% 2017 68
3 Turnbull Bay Road Trail Industrial Park Av to Fairgreen Av
Trail New Smyrna Beach 10% 2017 59
124 S11w‐121‐01
SR 442 Sidewalk I‐95 to Air Park Rd Sidewalk Edgewater 10% 2016 57.83 Initial project application submitted in 2011
5 Taylor Road Sidewalk Leaning Tree Place to Blue Lake Av
Sidewalk DeLand 10% 2017 57.75
87
DRAF
T
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects
Pg 29
Priority Ranking
R2CTPO Project# Project Name Project Limits Project Type Sponsor
Local Match %
Year Submitted
Project Score Comments
6 Madeline Av Sidewalk Clyde Morris Bv to Nova Rd Sidewalk Port Orange 10% 2017 57.50
137 S15w‐102‐01
Willow Run Bv Sidewalk Harms Way to Clyde Morris Bv
Sidewalk Port Orange 10% 2015 57
8 Sugarmill Drive Trail NSB Multi‐Use Trail to Gibralter Bv
Trail New Smyrna Beach 10% 2017 56.5
149 S15p‐107‐01
Magnolia Av Shared Use Path
Reed Canal Rd to Beville Rd Trail South Daytona 10% 2015 56.3
10 South St Trail Turnbull Bay Rd to US 1 Trail New Smyrna Beach 10% 2017 56.25
1511 S15w‐103‐01
Center Av Sidewalk, Phase 2 3rd St to LPGA Bv Sidewalk Holly Hill 10% 2015 55.7
1612 TBD Pedestrian Enhancements and Traffic Control Calming
[multiple locations on SR A1A and SR 100]
Pedestrian Signals and Speed Indicators
Flagler Beach 10% 2016 54 Removed by Project Sponsor Submitted on Traffic Operations and Safety Project Application
1712 S15p‐108‐01
Anastasia Dr Shared Use Path
Reed Canal Rd to Big Tree Rd
Trail South Daytona 10% 2015 52.3
13 Ocean Av Sidewalk S. Peninsula Av to S. Atlantic Av
Sidewalk New Smyrna Beach 10% 2017 52.25
1814 S14p‐108‐01
Volusia Gap US 17‐92 Bridge to Spring to Spring Trail
Trail Volusia County 10% 2014 43
15 Art Center Bv Sidewalk Sundance Trail to US 1 Sidewalk New Smyrna Beach 10% 2017 44
1916 S11w‐110‐01
Lambert Av Sidewalk Palm Dr to Lambert Cove Sidewalk Flagler Beach 10% 2016 35.5 Initial project application submitted in 2011
20 S12w‐109‐01
Herbert St Sidewalk‐East Jackson St to Railroad Crossing
Sidewalk Port Orange 10% 2012 35 Removed by Project Sponsor
TBD – to be determined
88
DRAF
T
Pg 30
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Transit Projects ADOPTED 6/22/16[DRAFT 5/9/17
Priority Rank FDOT FM# R2CTPO Project# Project Name Project Limits Project Type Sponsor Programmed Phase(s) Needed Phase(s) Estimated Total Project Cost Comments
Note: Transit projects are typically identified by the designated recipient of transit funding. No transit projects have been identified at this time.
89
DRAF
T
Pg 31
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Transportation Planning Studies ADOPTED 6/22/16[DRAFT 5/9/17
Priority Rank
FDOT FM#
R2CTPO Study ID# Study Name Study Limits Sponsor
Programmed (Year)
Estimated Total Study
CostYear
Submitted Score Comments 1 Mason Avenue Corridor Study from Riverside Dr to Williamson
Blvd Daytona Beach
‐ $75,000 2015 35.75 FDOT is committed to a “partnership”, but can’t initiate before FY 17/18.
2 SR 44 & Beresford Avenue Extension from Kepler Rd to SR 44 DeLand ‐ $100,000 2015 34.88
3 LPGA Blvd Corridor Management Plan LPGA Blvd from US 92 to SR 5A (Nova Rd)
Volusia County
‐ 2017 33.56
34 Beachside Neighborhood Pedestrian Safety, Mobility & Access
beachside in Daytona Beach Daytona Beach
‐ $75,000 2015 32.50
45 Ft Florida Road Planning Study US 17 DeBary ‐ $75,000 2016 31.83
5 DeBary Village Center Corridor Improvement Study
from Highbanks Rd at US 17‐92 to Plantation Rd at US 17‐92.
DeBary ‐ TBD 2017 31.78
6 West extension of DeLand Greenway downtown area along the DeLand Greenway or Alabama Greenway to the Spring to Spring Trail between Minnesota Av south to Euclid Av
DeLand ‐ $25,000 to $55,000
2017 29.89
56 Daytona Beach Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan
City‐wide Daytona Beach
‐ $115,000 2015 24.75
67 New Smyrna Beach Trolley Feasibility Study City‐wide New Smyrna Beach
‐ $50,000 2016 27.67
78 New Smyrna Beach US 1 Complete Streets South city limit to north city limit
New Smyrna Beach
‐ $64,000 2016 27.50
9 Flagler Beach Multi‐Modal Hub Study City‐wide Flagler Beach
‐ $150,000 2017 25.44
510 Daytona Beach Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan
City‐wide Daytona Beach
‐ $115,000 2015 24.75
90
DRAF
T
River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Transportation Planning Studies
Pg 32
Priority Rank
FDOT FM#
R2CTPO Study ID# Study Name Study Limits Sponsor
Programmed (Year)
Estimated Total Study
CostYear
Submitted Score Comments 811 I‐95/ US 1 Interchange Modifications at SR 5/US 1 ‐ TBD 2016 (not
scored) SIS Needs List
912 I‐95/LPGA Blvd Interchange Modifications at LPGA Blvd ‐ TBD 2016 (not scored)
SIS Needs List
1013 I‐95/Pioneer Trail New Interchange at Pioneer Trail ‐ TBD 2016 (not scored)
Volusia County‐Funded Projects List
TBD – to be determined
91
MEETING SUMMARY CAC & TCC
MAY 16, 2017
V. PRESENTATIONS, STATUS REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS B. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION OF THE DRAFT FY 2017/18 – FY 2021/22 TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) Background Information: The TPO is required by 23 U.S.C. 134(j) to develop a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The TIP is a prioritized listing of transportation projects covering a period of five years that is developed and formally adopted by the TPO, consistent with the Long Range Transportation Plan, and required for projects to be eligible for funding under title 23 U.S.C. and title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53. The TIP is developed in cooperation with FDOT and public transit operators.
The TIP lists capital and non-capital surface transportation projects proposed for funding under Title 23 U.S.C. and Title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 (including transportation enhancements; safety projects; trails projects; pedestrian walkways; and bicycle facilities). Also required to be included are all regionally significant projects requiring an action by FHWA or FTA regardless of funding source and projects that implement paratransit plans required for compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. For information and conformity purposes, the TIP includes all regionally significant projects to be funded with federal funds other than those administered by the FHWA or FTA, as well as all regionally significant projects to be funded with non-federal funds.
Robert Keeth, TPO Senior Planner, will lead a committee discussion regarding the draft FY 2017/18 to FY 2021/22 TIP which is available for download from the TPO’s website.
Also available for download from the TPO’s website is the TIP Comparison Report. This report provides a project by project comparison of the current FY 2016/17 – FY 2020/21 TIP and the draft FY 2017/18 – FY 2021/22 TIP.
Issues identified during this discussion will be addressed in a subsequent draft which will be presented to the CAC/TCC for final review and recommended approval in June.
The Draft FY 2017/18 – FY 2021/22 TIP and TIP Comparison Report are available for your review at: http://www.r2ctpo.org/agendasminutes/tcc/agenda/
ACTION REQUESTED:
NO ACTION REQUIRED UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE COMMITTEE
92
MEETING SUMMARY CAC & TCC
MAY 16, 2017
V. PRESENTATIONS, STATUS REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS C. PRESENTATION AND UPDATE ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUS STOP IMPROVEMENT PLAN
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Background Information:
The purpose of the Volusia County Bus Stop Improvement Plan is to better serve the general public with safe and accessible bus stops. The two-phased plan aims to update the existing bus stop database in a systematic format, to help identify roles for maintenance and to offer improvement strategies based on the individual city’s need. The effort is intended to identify a uniform process to document bus stop conditions throughout Volusia County and within each of the individual cities served by Votran. A final report and database will be prepared for the entire Votran fixed route transit system to identify infrastructure near existing bus stops and outline an approach for implementing improvements in unincorporated areas of the county. Phase II may extend the effort from Phase I to provide city profile reports for each of the individual cities based on the voluntary participation of the cities. The project scope was presented to the TPO Board and Advisory Committees in March. Under direction from the board, the draft Scope of Services for the study was distributed to TPO Board members and TCC members for further review and comments during April. One comment and one letter (attached) was received for the draft scope. ACTION REQUESTED: STAFF REQUESTS DIRECTION TO PROCEED WITH THIS EFFORT
93
April 4, 2017
Volusia County Bus Stop Improvement Project (Phase I)
DRAFT Scope of Work
Purpose
The purpose of the Volusia County Bus Stop Improvement Plan is to better serve the general public with safe and accessible bus stops. The two-phased plan aims to update the existing bus stop database in a systematic format, to help identify roles for maintenance and to offer improvement strategies based on individual city’s need. The effort is intended to identify a uniform process to document bus stop conditions throughout Volusia County and within each of the individual cities served by Votran. A final report and database will be prepared for the entire Votran fixed route transit system to identify infrastructure near existing bus stops and outline an approach for implementing improvements in unincorporated areas of the county. Phase II may extend the effort from Phase I to provide city profile reports for each of the individual cities based on the voluntary participation of the cities.
Scope of Work/Plan Elements
Building on Votran’s existing bus stop inventory data, Phase I activities will use a systematic method for collecting and updating existing conditions data. A standardized industry database will be utilized for this data collection effort. Activities will be coordinated through a stakeholder group to ensure that local plans and policies are collected and understood and stakeholders can provide input and gain understanding of county efforts. Phase I will also develop the Unincorporated County’s Profile with input from and coordination with stakeholders. The Unincorporated County’s profile will include a coordinated plan for the unincorporated area in the County to implement improvements based on anticipated funding and/or resource availability over time. A bus stop maintenance agreement template will also be developed to serve as a basis for future efforts in service delivery. This can provide an example that can be modified for other individual jurisdictions.
Outcomes
1. Documentation of existing plans and policies of cities 2. A refined and updated database of existing infrastructure for Votran bus stops 3. A Transit Development Design Guideline (TDDG) cross-reference for all bus stops in the
inventory 4. Establishment of Key Contacts for Cities/Local Agencies
94
5. Improved communication and coordination with stakeholders 6. Unincorporated County Profile that includes planned improvements based on the jurisdiction’s
need 7. Bus Stop Inter-local Maintenance Agreement template
Staff meetings with project progress discussion will be held as needed. In addition to the documentation of the Phase I Plan, a final presentation will be made to Volusia County, the R2CTPO standing committees and board, and the public for comments. The final report will be presented for approval by the River to Sea TPO.
Deliverables
1. A Bus Stop Inter-local Maintenance Agreement Template 2. The Draft Bus Stop Improvement Plan Phase I Report 3. An updated bus stop database
Scope of Work
Phase I: System Existing Conditions and Unincorporated County Profile
Task 1: Kick-Off and Development of Goals, Objectives & Criteria The Consultant shall identify stakeholders that include representatives of cities interested in participating. The Consultant shall meet with Votran staff, River to Sea TPO staff and the project stakeholders to review the proposed scope of work and discuss the existing inventory in the ATSIM software system, verify the project schedule, refine tasks, and identify project communication and decision procedures. The Consultant shall establish a draft framework for the program that includes goals/objectives, policies/guiding principles, performance measures and targets, standards/requirements, and methodologies that address public access to Votran fixed route service. The Consultant shall meet with the project stakeholders to discuss the draft framework, and recommend a basis for developing a rating system that establishes categories of the unincorporated County’s bus stop conditions and further determines priorities within the jurisdiction.
Task 2: Overview of Existing Conditions
The consultant shall review Votran’s existing ATSIM database and categorize each bus stop, based upon the available ATSIM data and with Votran’s guidance, generally as follows:
95
· “Good” – A safe and viable route is provided for transit users to access the bus stop. The sidewalk slopes and surfaces are in good condition, lighting is adequate, the boarding and alighting area is of appropriate material and dimension, route signage is available, amenities are appropriate for the location, and obstructions are non-existent.
· “Fair” – A safe and viable route is provided to access the bus stop, the sidewalk slopes and surfaces are generally in fair condition, the boarding and alighting area is of appropriate material and dimensions, route signage is available, lighting is adequate and some amenities are provided as appropriate.
· “Poor” – A bus stop does not meet any of the above criteria.
Other factors, such as location, pedestrian crossing and etc. may also be considered in the category. The overall existing conditions data will be summarized. Task 3: Perform Unincorporated County Inventory Analysis The consultant shall create a sample Profile for the unincorporated County. As such, the consultant shall perform a comprehensive inventory assessment of Votran’s field data collection within the unincorporated Volusia County, which is estimated to contain approximately 300 bus stops.
The objectives of this work component are to: 1. Review the existing ATSIM bus stop inventory within the unincorporated County and
perform supplementary data collection as needed to compile a fully inclusive bus stop inventory of the system. The data collected during this task will include the identification and assessment of each bus stop’s accessibility issue(s), if any, including but not limited to: a. Board and alighting areas; b. Percent of slope and surface connections; c. Curb cuts, ramps, and detectable warnings; d. Signage, shelters, benches, and amenities; and e. Other accessibility issues, sidewalks, signs and poles, irrigation sprinklers, lighting,
protruding objects (such as trees), and pedestrian push buttons. Note: Task 3 will have an upset limit of $9,000 to allow for a wide range of supplementary, as-needed data collection and will be billed on a cost-plus basis, not to exceed this price. However, approval is required from the TPO and Votran project management staff prior to any Consultant’s filed activities. TPO and Votran staff will assist with the field data collection effort when possible to reduce project costs.
Task 4: Unincorporated County Bus Stop and Right of Way Improvements Votran’s existing unincorporated Volusia County ATSIM database and any newly collected bus stop inventory data will be refined to determine the necessary improvements needed to bring the jurisdiction’s approximately 300 bus stops into the adopted TDDG standard. In addition, any newly collected data whose attributes can be added logically to the ATSIM database will be included to provide Votran, and the County with a more complete bus stop attribute database.
96
Task 5: Prepare a Unincorporated County Plan The Consultant will prepare an unincorporated Volusia County plan, which will include:
· Identifying needed improvements at each bus stop o The design standard in the adopted TDDG shall be recommended to be implemented at
each bus stop that has barriers to accessibility. · A phasing program for implementing improvements based on the anticipated funding will be
developed. o This will involve using the established criteria for prioritization of improvements, as
determined by stakeholders in Task 1, as well as developing the following: 1. Detailed cost estimate associated with all necessary improvements; 2. A list of projects in consultation with Votran staff, stakeholders, and Volusia County
staff; and 3. Unincorporated Volusia County implementation schedule.
Task 6: Meetings and Documentation This task includes meetings, status reports, and documentation of the Phase 1 analysis.
1. Status meetings with Votran/TPO staff will be scheduled monthly, or as needed, and include stakeholders, as appropriate.
2. Coordination meetings with identified stakeholders to review the inventory, discuss and develop a three-tiered rating system for bus stops and that prioritizes projects for bus stop improvements in the unincorporated county (three meetings).
3. The Bus Stop Improvement Plan Phase I Reports will be created. An appendix will be included that contains a description of the database developed as part of the project, procedures for database updates, and the database in a GIS format. (Note: all data records generated by the project will be transferred to Votran for their use.)
4. The Consultant shall deliver a PDF of Bus Stop Improvement Plan Report to the Project Manager.
Phase II of the Plan will continue based on the voluntary participation of the individual jurisdictions.
97
98
MEETING SUMMARY CAC & TCC
MAY 16, 2017
V. PRESENTATIONS, STATUS REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS D. FDOT REPORT Background Information: Mr. Gene Ferguson, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), will be present to answer questions regarding projects on the FDOT Construction Status Report. The Construction Status Report is provided for your information. ACTION REQUESTED: NO ACTION REQUIRED UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE COMMITTEE
99
Volusia/Flagler County Project Status Update as of April 21, 2017
The following is a brief status update on major FDOT road construction projects in Volusia and Flagler counties as of the April cutoff. The next cutoff date is May 21, 2017. Information is also available on www.cflroads.com.
Interstate Projects
· 408464-1-52-01 -- I-4 Widening – from SR 44 to East of I-95 o Contract: E5R16 o All travel lanes are open. o Last contract day is May 7 (as of 4/28/2017)
· 242715-2-52-01 -- I-95 Widening, I-4, US 92 System to System Interchange o Contract: E5W26 o Work Began: November 2014 o Estimated Completion: Spring 2018 o Demolition of old Spruce Creek bridges in progress. o Demolition of old bridge over SR 421 occurring May 1-5 o Traffic shifted at the I-4/I-95 interchange onto new ramps last week
· 432455-1-52-01 -- SR 400 / I-4 Resurfacing between St. John’s River Bridge and
Saxon Boulevard o Contract: T5542 o Work Began: February 2016 o Work substantially complete. Final striping underway this week
Other Current Projects:
· 434455-1-52-01 – SR 40 from Interchange Blvd. to I-95 SB ramp, turn lane improvements, including drainage improvements
o Contract: E5Y32 o Work Began: Nov. 7, 2016
100
o Paving completed. o This project has been accepted
· 430678-1-52-01 – Resurfacing US 1 from South Street in Oak Hill to Magnolia
Ave/Shangri-La Circle in Edgewater o Contract: T5563 o Work Began: August 2016 o Estimated Completion: Early 2018 o Contractor working on drainage and placing the new sidewalk. o Paving has resumed
· 437448-1-52-01 -- SR 46 Bridge Deck Overlay – Bridge No. 790030 over the St.
John’s River just east of Little Big Econ State Park o Contract: E5Y37 o Work Began: march 27, 2017 o The contractor is placing final striping May 5
· 436937-1-52-01 -- SR 40 (Granada Boulevard) Bridge Pier Repair – Bridge No.
790132 over the Halifax River. o Contract: E5Y33 o Work Began: March 27, 2017 o Estimated Completion: Late 2017 o Coffer dam construction was delayed. Expected to start in the next few weeks. o The channel will remain open
101
FDOT District 5 - DeLand Operations Office 1650 N. Kepler Road , DeLand, FL 32724
Phone (386) 740-3548 Fax (386) 736-5469 DeLand Operations Engineer Ron Meade, P.E
Project Status Report as of April 21, 2017
Outside Consultant
In-House Construction
Maintenance
FIN #
CONTRACT #
TIME COST
CONTRACTOR: Archer Western Contractors LLC LET DATE: 9/05/2014 ORIGINAL: 1,100 $204,975,000.00
CCEI: Jacobs Engineering Group NTP: 11/25/2014 CURRENT: 1,290 $204,975,000.00
FED. AID #: 0954-140-1 TIME BEGAN: 11/25/2014 ELAPSED: 874 $131,022,399.42
FUND TYPE Federal WORK BEGAN: 11/25/2014 % ORIGINAL: 79.45% 63.92%
DBE Achieved 3.43% EST. COMPLETION: Spring 2018 % TO DATE: 67.75% 63.92%
Current CPPR: 100 LIQ. DAMAGES: 0
Robert Parker
CEI PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR David Bowden C: 407.873.1905 O: 386.333.9538 [email protected]
Catherine Abernethy
Jeff Hutchinson, P.E.
Eric Jones
Jaime Venegas
Bradley Bauknecht, P.E.
Tony Phillips
Jose Medina
Jim Read
Jeff Hutchinson, P.E.
Jason Roberts
FDOT PROJECT MANAGER: C: 386.290.6844 O: 386.740.3519 [email protected]
SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER:
CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT MANAGER: C: 904.669.8931 O: 386.333.9575 [email protected]
CONTRACTOR'S ASST PROJECT MANAGER C: 504.202.5340 O: 813.489.4128 [email protected]
CONTRACTOR'S ASST PROJECT MANAGER C: 817.721.5071 O: 386.333.9576 [email protected]
CEI SENIOR PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR C: 904.449.0923 O: 386.333.9537 [email protected]
MEETING SCHEUDLE: Tuesday 9:30 a.m., Field Office, 735 Fentress Blvd.
MAINTENANCE CONTACT: C: 386.801.5584 O: 386.740.3406 [email protected]
24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 904.669.8931 O: 386.333.9575 [email protected]
SENIOR INSPECTOR: C: 904.626.0076 O: 386.333.9537 [email protected]
SENIOR INSPECTOR: C: 386.804.2403 O: 386.333.9537 [email protected]
ALT. 24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 386.916.4439 O: 386.333.9575 [email protected]
Volusia County
I-95, I-4, US 92 SYSTEM TO SYSTEM INTERCHANGE
242715-2-52-01
E5W26
DESIGN BUILD
CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST (CSS) C: 407.335.6390 O: 386.333.9537 [email protected]
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widening of I-95 from four to six lanes, complete reconstruction of the I-4/SR 400 and US 92 interchanges, reconstruction of Bellevue Bridge,
improvements to SR 400, US 92, Bellevue Road and Tomoka Farms Road
CONTACT PHONE EMAIL
FIN #
CONTRACT #
TIME COST
CONTRACTOR: Condotte / DeMoya Group LET DATE: 2/3/2012 ORIGINAL: 900 $134,462,000.00
CCEI: Parsons Brinkerhoff Inc. NTP: 5/9/2012 CURRENT: 1,818 $142,782,597.66
FED. AID #: 422501 TIME BEGAN: 5/9/2012 ELAPSED: 1,804 $140,680,965.98
FUND TYPE FAO WORK BEGAN: 5/9/2012 % ORIGINAL: 200.44% 104.63%
DBE Achieved 10.03% EST. COMPLETION: May 2017 % TO DATE: 99.23% 98.53%
Current CPPR: 96% LIQ. DAMAGES:
Steve Wigle, P.E.
Mike Atkins
Barry Johnson
Grant Cool
Brad Bauknecht, P.E.
Jay Johnson
Jim Read
Grant Cool
Wade Knowlton
C: 407.406.1218 [email protected]
24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 305.322.5597 O: 386.873.0770 [email protected]
ALT. 24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 305.338.8027
MAINTENANCE CONTACT: C: 386.801.5584 O: 386.740.3406 [email protected]
SENIOR ROADWAY INSPECTOR:
Volusia County
I-4 WIDENING - SR 44 to East of I -95
CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT: C: 305.322.5597 O: 386.873.0770 [email protected]
FDOT PROJECT MANAGER: C: 386.846.4149 Alt: 386.748.6502 [email protected]
CEI SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER C: 407.509.8541 [email protected]
C: 407.947.7426 O: 386.873.0772 [email protected] PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR
408464-1-52-01
E5R16
DESIGN BUILD
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Interstate widening from four lanes to six lanes
CONTACT PHONE
CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST (CSS)
C: 321.229.9821
MEETING SCHEUDLE: Thursday 1:30 p.m. at the Field Office 102
Project Status Report as of April 21, 2017
Outside Consultant
In-House Construction
Maintenance
FIN #
CONTRACT #
TIME COST
CONTRACTOR: Ranger Construction Industries LET DATE: 10/28/2015 ORIGINAL: 260 $6,389,000.00
CCEI: Mehta and Associates Inc. NTP: 12/29/2015 CURRENT: 435 $6,567,625.98
FED. AID #: 0042 270 I TIME BEGAN: 2/27/2016 ELAPSED: 415 $6,069,231.64
FUND TYPE CLS WORK BEGAN: 2/27/2016 % ORIGINAL: 159.62% 95.00%
DBE Achieved 4.54% EST. COMPLETION: Spring 2017 % TO DATE: 95.40% 92.41%
Current CPPR 96 LIQ. DAMAGES:
Kerry Worrell, P.E.
Chris Kochis
Juan Arce
Terry Overcash
Glenn Raney
Anu Shah, P.E.
Alan Forget
Chris McKenzie
Jim Read
Juan Arce
Trent Dion
MEETING SCHEUDLE: Tuesdays 10:30 a.m., Mehta & Associates, 1 Purlieu Place, Suite 100, Winter Park
MAINTENANCE CONTACT: C: 386.801.5584 O: 386.740.3406 [email protected]
24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 407.948.4553 [email protected]
ALT. 24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 386.527.3436 [email protected]
SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER: O: 407.657.8662 C: 850.341.6114 [email protected]
SENIOR INSPECTOR: C: 321.377.5848 [email protected]
RESIDENT ASPHALT SPECIALIST C: 386-290-9301 [email protected]
CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT MANAGER: C: 407.948.4553 [email protected]
CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT: C: 863.559.1206 [email protected]
FDOT PROJECT MANAGER: O: 386.740.3524 C: 386.846.4862 [email protected]
CONTACT PHONE EMAIL
CEI SENIOR PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR O: 407.657.6662 C: 321.239.7308 [email protected]
CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST (CSS) O: 407.754.6425 C: 386.690.9690 [email protected]
Volusia County
SR 400 (I-4) RESURFACING ST. JOHN'S RIVER BRIDGE TO SAXON BOULEVARD
432455-1-52-01
T5542
LUMP SUM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Milling and resurfacing of I-4 from east end of St. John's River Bridge to just west of Saxon Boulevard, including ramps at Exit 108
FIN #
CONTRACT #
TIME COST
CONTRACTOR: P&S Paving Inc. LET DATE: 6/15/2016 ORIGINAL: 480 $10,074,300.00
FED. AID #: 4857054P NTP: 8/11/2016 CURRENT: 513 $10,109,055.06
FUND TYPE TIME BEGAN: 8/15/2016 ELAPSED: 245 $4,803,534.29
DBE Achieved 1.20% WORK BEGAN: 8/15/2016 % ORIGINAL: 51.04% 47.68%
Current CPPR: 100 EST. COMPLETION: 12/30/2017 % TO DATE: 47.76% 47.52%
LIQ. DAMAGES:
Barry Johnson
Denise Druding
Brian Davidson
John Dunlap
Paul Wabi, P.E.
Jessy Heflin
Kamlesh Suthar
Jim Read
John Dunlap
Brian Davidson
VOLUSIA
SR 5/US 1 Resurfacing Oak Hill-Edgewater
430678-1-52-01
T5563
Construction Pay Item
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Resurfacing from South Street in Oak Hill to Magnolia Ave/Shangri-La Circle in Edgewater. Also includes new sidewalks, drainage and signal
improvements.
CONTACT PHONE EMAIL
PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR C: 407.947.7426 [email protected]
CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST (CSS) O: 386.740.3430 [email protected]
CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT MANAGER: C: 386.566.0551 [email protected]
CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT: C: 386.214.8896 [email protected]
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER C: 386.279.5504 O: 386.740.3594 [email protected]
SENIOR INSPECTOR: C: 407.973.6510 [email protected]
ALT. 24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 386.566.0551 [email protected]
MEETING SCHEDULE:
ADD'L SENIOR INSPECTOR C: 863.399.0304 [email protected]
MAINTENANCE CONTACT: C: 386.801.5584 O: 386.740.3406 [email protected]
24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 386.214.8896 [email protected]
103
Project Status Report as of April 21, 2017
Outside Consultant
In-House Construction
Maintenance
FIN #
CONTRACT #
TIME COST
CONTRACTOR: Blacktip Services Inc. LET DATE: 8/02/2016 ORIGINAL: 120 $622,133.25
FED. AID #: NTP: 10/07/2016 CURRENT: 178 $622,133.25
FUND TYPE TIME BEGAN: 11/4/2016 ELAPSED: 137 $522,278.03
DBE Achieved 0.81% WORK BEGAN: 11/7/2016 % ORIGINAL: 114.17% 83.95%
Current CPPR: 94 EST. COMPLETION: 4/27/2017 % TO DATE: 76.97% 83.95%
LIQ. DAMAGES:
Dwight Grube
Denise Druding
Billy Rose
Dusty Baumgartner
Paul Wabi, P.E.
Kristina Widup
Charles Woods
Billy Rose
Gina Spencer
FIN #
CONTRACT #
TIME COST
CONTRACTOR: Cheyenne Associates Inc. LET DATE: 10/04/2016 ORIGINAL: 90 $862,770.36
FED. AID #: N/A NTP: 11/29/2016 CURRENT: 108 $862,770.36
FUND TYPE CPI TIME BEGAN: 1/3/2017 ELAPSED: 103 $710,982.33
DBE Achieved 0.00% WORK BEGAN: 1/9/2017 % ORIGINAL: 114.44% 82.41%
Current CPPR: 98 EST. COMPLETION: 4/30/2017 % TO DATE: 95.37% 82.41%
LIQ. DAMAGES:
Glenn Raney
Denise Druding
Jeff Hansen
Gary Wingate
Paul Wabi, P.E.
Paul Stacks
Jim Read
Gary Wingate
Jeff Hansen
VOLUSIA
SR 40 from Interchange Boulevard to I-95 South Ramp
434455-1-52-01
E5Y32
Construction Pay Item
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen and lengthen the right turn lane from SR 40 to the I-95 SB ramp
Work Complete - Update Pending Final Acceptance
CONTACT PHONE EMAIL
PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR C: 386.846.4587 O: 386.740.3482 [email protected]
CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST (CSS) O: 386.740.3430 [email protected]
CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT MANAGER: C: 954.303.4593 [email protected]
CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT: C: 239.601.1536 [email protected]
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER C: 386.279.5504 O: 386.740.3594 [email protected]
SENIOR INSPECTOR: C: 561.385.6358 [email protected]
ADD'L SENIOR INSPECTOR
MEETING SCHEDULE:
MAINTENANCE CONTACT: O: 386.740.3541 C: 386.847.3700 [email protected]
24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 954.303.4593 [email protected]
ALT. 24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 954.324.5300 [email protected]
FLAGLER
SR 20/100 Milling and Resurfacing from West of Bunnell to SR 5/US 1
432346-1-52-01
E5Y63
Construction Pay Item
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Mill and resurface SR 20/SR 100 from west of Bunnell City limits to SR 5/US 1 with minor safety upgrades.
CONTACT PHONE EMAIL
PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR C:386.846.4862 O: 386.740.3524 [email protected]
CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST (CSS) O: 386.740.3430 [email protected]
CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT MANAGER: C: 708.254.5333 [email protected]
CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT: O: 352.544.2723 C: 727.271.6441 [email protected]
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER C: 386.279.5504 O: 386.740.3594 [email protected]
SENIOR INSPECTOR: C: 863-243-9440 [email protected]
ALT. 24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 708.254.5333 [email protected]
MEETING SCHEDULE:
ADD'L SENIOR INSPECTOR
MAINTENANCE CONTACT: C: 386.801.5584 O: 386.740.3406 [email protected]
24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: O: 352.544.2723 C: 727.271.6441 [email protected]
104
Project Status Report as of April 21, 2017
Outside Consultant
In-House Construction
Maintenance
FIN #
CONTRACT #
TIME COST
CONTRACTOR: CMA Corporation LET DATE: 9/07/2016 ORIGINAL: 250 $1,750,000.00
FED. AID #: NTP: 11/14/2016 CURRENT: 260 $1,750,000.00
FUND TYPE TIME BEGAN: 2/27/2017 ELAPSED: 49 $137,700.00
DBE Achieved 0.00% WORK BEGAN: 3/27/2017 % ORIGINAL: 19.60% 7.87%
Current CPPR: 98 EST. COMPLETION: 11/13/2017 % TO DATE: 18.85% 7.87%
LIQ. DAMAGES:
Rick Coe
Denise Druding
Armando Cardona Jr.
Robert Bell
Paul Wabi, P.E.
Chuck Crossman
Chris Eckert
Armando Cardona Jr.
Robert Bell
FIN #
CONTRACT #
TIME COST
CONTRACTOR: Oceaneer Consulting LLC LET DATE: 12/06/2016 ORIGINAL: 85 $339,868.20
FED. AID #: N/A NTP: 2/15/2017 CURRENT: 103 $339,868.20
FUND TYPE CLS TIME BEGAN: 2/15/2017 ELAPSED: 62 $183,417.60
DBE Achieved 0.00% WORK BEGAN: 2/15/2017 % ORIGINAL: 72.94% 53.97%
Current CPPR: 98 EST. COMPLETION: 5/21/2017 % TO DATE: 60.19% 53.97%
LIQ. DAMAGES:
Glenn Raney
Ernie Saltar
Christian Villegas
Edwin Aponte
Paul Wabi, P.E.
Prince Dorvilus
N/A
Chris Eckert
Christian Villegas
Edwin AponteALT. 24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 954.328.3477
MEETING SCHEDULE: TBD
ADD'L SENIOR INSPECTOR
MAINTENANCE CONTACT: O: 386.740.3463 C: 386.801.5505 [email protected]
24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 321.604.1371 [email protected]
CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT: C: 954.328.3477
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER C: 386.279.5504 O: 386.740.3594 [email protected]
SENIOR INSPECTOR: C: 407.276.5810 [email protected]
PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR C:386.846.4862 O: 386.740.3524 [email protected]
CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST (CSS) O: 386.740.3416 [email protected]
CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT MANAGER: C: 321.604.1371 [email protected]
VOLUSIA
SR 46 Bridge Deck Epoxy/Flint Rock Overlay (Bridge No. 790030)
437448-1-52-01
E5Y37
Lump Sum Contract
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SR 46 bridge deck overlay of bridge #790030 over the St. John's River Bridge, with milling and resurfacing of east bridge approach
CONTACT PHONE EMAIL
VOLUSIA
SR 40 (Granada Boulevard) Bridge Pier Repair over the Halifax River
436937-1-52-01
E5Y33
Construction Lump Sum
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Repairs to Pier 8 crash wall of bridge No. 790132 in Ormond Beach
CONTACT PHONE EMAIL
PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR C: 386.527.3831 O: 386.740.3490 [email protected]
CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST (CSS) O: 386.740.3430 [email protected]
CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT MANAGER: C: 786.586.0597 [email protected]
CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT: C: 305.923.0508
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER C: 386.279.5504 O: 386.740.3594 [email protected]
SENIOR INSPECTOR: C: 407.907-4300 [email protected]
ALT. 24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 305.923.0508
MEETING SCHEDULE:
ADD'L SENIOR INSPECTOR
MAINTENANCE CONTACT: O: 386.740.3463 C: 386.801.5505 [email protected]
24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 786.586.0597 [email protected]
105
Project Status Report as of April 21, 2017
Outside Consultant
In-House Construction
Maintenance
FIN #
CONTRACT #
TIME COST
CONTRACTOR: Evans Contracting Services Inc. LET DATE: 3/01/2016 ORIGINAL: 220 $1,831,436.50
FED. AID #: NTP: 5/10/2016 CURRENT: 399 $1,860,516.87
FUND TYPE TIME BEGAN: 5/24/2016 ELAPSED: 299 $1,385,194.47
DBE Achieved 0% WORK BEGAN: 5/24/2016 % ORIGINAL: 135.91% 75.63%
Current CFPR: 86 EST. COMPLETION: Summer 2017 % TO DATE: 74.94% 74.45%
LIQ. DAMAGES:
Ernie Saltar
Denise Druding
Clint McKee
Geoff Perry
Paul Wabi, P.E.
Mallie Hunt
Rick Snow
Geoff Perry
Clint McKee
FIN #
CONTRACT #
TIME COST
CONTRACTOR: Evans Contracting Services Inc. LET DATE: 9/07/2016 ORIGINAL: 180 $1,077,875.00
FED. AID #: NTP: 11/06/2016 CURRENT: 209 $1,077,875.00
FUND TYPE TIME BEGAN: 11/20/2016 ELAPSED: 148 $557,471.00
DBE Achieved 0% WORK BEGAN: 11/21/2016 % ORIGINAL: 82.22% 51.72%
Current CFPR: 98 EST. COMPLETION: 6/16/2017 % TO DATE: 70.81% 51.72%
LIQ. DAMAGES:
Rick Coe
Denise Druding
Clint McKee
Sylvan Taylor
Paul Wabi, P.E.
Alan Forget
Charles Woods
Clint McKee
Brian Frey
MEETING SCHEDULE: Wednesdays as needed on site
24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 904.485.0158 [email protected]
ALT. 24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 904.203.3147
SENIOR BRIDGE INSPECTOR (if applicable):
MAINTENANCE CONTACT: O: 386.740.3541 C: 386.847.3700 [email protected]
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER C: 386.279.5504 O: 386.740.3594 [email protected]
SENIOR ROADWAY INSPECTOR: C: 321.377.5848 [email protected]
CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT MANAGER: C: 904.485.0158 [email protected]
CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT: C: 904.353.2486
PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR C: 386.527.3831 O: 386.740.3490 [email protected]
CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST O: 386.740.3430 [email protected]
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Desilt, video and line drainage pipes, repair concrete inlet caps, between Nova Road and SR A1A.
CONTACT PHONE EMAIL
VOLUSIA
SR 600/US 92 Pipe Lining and Repair
427986-1-72-12
E5T89
Maintenance Pay Item
VOLUSIA
SR 441 (S. Peninsula Drive) Pipe Lining and Repair
427986-1-72-10
E5T55
Maintenance Pay Item
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Desilt, video and line drainage pipes, repair concrete inlet caps, replace drainage pipe US 92 and SR A1A
Maintenance Contract - Update as of March invoice
CONTACT PHONE EMAIL
PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR O: 386.740.3416 [email protected]
CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST O: 386.740.3430 [email protected]
CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT MANAGER: C: 904.485.0158 [email protected]
CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT: C: 904.588.4302 [email protected]
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER C: 386.279.5504 O: 386.740.3594 [email protected]
SENIOR ROADWAY INSPECTOR: C: 407.509.2042 [email protected]
SENIOR BRIDGE INSPECTOR (if applicable):
MAINTENANCE CONTACT: O: 386.740.3414 [email protected]
MEETING SCHEDULE: Wednesdays as needed on site
24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 904.588.4302 [email protected]
ALT. 24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 904.485.0158 [email protected]
106
Project Status Report as of April 21, 2017
Outside Consultant
In-House Construction
Maintenance
FIN #
CONTRACT #
TIME COST
CONTRACTOR: Shen-Line, LLC LET DATE: 10/04/2016 ORIGINAL: 180 $1,008,407.50
FED. AID #: NTP: 11/20/2016 CURRENT: 207 $1,008,407.50
FUND TYPE TIME BEGAN: 12/4/2016 ELAPSED: 134 $243,484.20
DBE Achieved 0% WORK BEGAN: 2/13/2017 % ORIGINAL: 74.44% 24.15%
Current CFPR: 96 EST. COMPLETION: 6/28/2017 % TO DATE: 64.73% 24.15%
LIQ. DAMAGES:
Rick Coe
Denise Druding
Louis Woska
Garrett Kulp
Paul Wabi, P.E.
TBD
Charles Woods
Louis Woska
Clint McKee
FIN #
CONTRACT #
TIME COST
CONTRACTOR: Envirowaste Services Group, Inc. LET DATE: 12/06/2016 ORIGINAL: 215 $1,085,190.00
FED. AID #: N/A NTP: 2/12/2017 CURRENT: 226 $1,085,190.00
FUND TYPE TIME BEGAN: 2/26/2017 ELAPSED: 22 $158,555.90
DBE Achieved 0% WORK BEGAN: 2/27/2017 % ORIGINAL: 10.23% 14.61%
Current CPPR: 100 EST. COMPLETION: 10/92017 % TO DATE: 9.73% 14.61%
LIQ. DAMAGES:
Rick Coe
Ernie Saltar
Cathy Oliphant
Cesar Maldonado
Paul Wabi, P.E.
Tom Barry
Charles Woods
Cesar Maldonado
Cathy Oliphant
MEETING SCHEDULE: Wednesdays as needed on site
24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 386.479.8318 [email protected]
ALT. 24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 904.485.0158 [email protected]
VOLUSIA
Pipe Cleaning, Lining, Repair and Video Inspection - Various Roads, Volusia County
429179-1-72-04
E5T90
Maintenance Pay Item
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Storm drain desilting, video inspection, lining and replacement on SR 15A, SR 5A, SR 430 and SR 44
CONTACT PHONE EMAIL
PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR
SENIOR BRIDGE INSPECTOR (if applicable):
MAINTENANCE CONTACT: O: 386.740.3541 C: 386.847.3700 [email protected]
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER C: 386.279.5504 O: 386.740.3594 [email protected]
SENIOR ROADWAY INSPECTOR:
CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT MANAGER: C: 386.479.8318
CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT:
PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR C: 386.527.3831 O: 386.740.3490 [email protected]
CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST O: 386.740.3430 [email protected]
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Desilt, video and line drainage pipes, repair concrete inlet caps, between US 92 and Beresford Avenue
CONTACT PHONE EMAIL
VOLUSIA
US 17/92 Pipe Cleaning, Lining and Video Inspection
427986-1-72-11
E5T88
Maintenance Pay Item
C: 386.527.3831 O: 386.740.3490 [email protected]
CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST (CSS) O: 386.740.3416 [email protected]
CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT MANAGER: C: 407.276.0517 [email protected]
CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT: C: 813.270.0132 [email protected]
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER C: 386.279.5504 O: 386.740.3594 [email protected]
SENIOR INSPECTOR: C: 561.301.4509 [email protected]
ALT. 24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 407.276.0517 [email protected]
MEETING SCHEDULE:
ADD'L SENIOR INSPECTOR
MAINTENANCE CONTACT: O: 386.740.3541 C: 386.847.3700 [email protected]
24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 813.270.0132 [email protected]
107
Project Status Report as of April 21, 2017
Outside Consultant
In-House Construction
Maintenance
LANDSCAPE PROJECTS CURRENTLY IN ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD
FIN # 435469-2-52-01 Contract Days: 951
CONTRACT # E5Y26
FIN # 435469-3-52-01 Contract Days: 907
CONTRACT # E5Y19
FIN # 435469-1-52-01 Contract Days: 876
CONTRACT # E5W92
VOLUSIA
I-4 / SR 44 Interchange Landscaping
Days Elapsed: 171
Present Amount: $798,477.26 Paid to Date: $630,715.22
VOLUSIA
I-95/US 1 Interchange Landscaping
Days Elapsed: 158
Present Amount: $907,950.50 Paid to Date: $811,351.80
VOLUSIA
I-4 / Saxon Boulevard Interchange Landscaping
Present Amount: $827,000 Paid to Date: $620,920
Days Elapsed: 205
108
MEETING SUMMARY CAC & TCC
MAY 16, 2017
V. PRESENTATIONS, STATUS REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS E. VOLUSIA AND FLAGLER COUNTY CONSTRUCTION REPORTS Background Information: The staff from Volusia County Traffic Engineering and Flagler County Traffic Engineering will present an update on the county projects that are either under construction or close to being ready for construction. The Volusia County Construction Report and the Flagler County Construction Report are provided for your review. The Flagler County Construction Report will be provided under separate cover. ACTION REQUESTED: NO ACTION REQUIRED UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE COMMITTEE
109
Volusia County Construction Report – APRIL 2017* Recently Completed within the last 6 months: 1) ECRRT - Segment 6 Trail (Cow Creek to Dale St.) 2) Spring to Spring Trail (Blue Springs Park to Detroit Terrace) 3) Pioneer Trail Curve Realignment at Turnbull Bay Rd. 4) Beville Road/Airport Business Park (Pelican Bay) Signal (includes fire preemption) 5) Doyle Rd. (Courtland Bl. to SR 415) – Paved shoulders 6) Howland Blvd. 4-lane widening (Courtland Bl. to SR 415) 7) S. Williamson Blvd. Ext. 4-lane widening (Pioneer Tr. to Airport Rd.) 8) Plymouth Ave. Sidewalk (from E. of Hazen Rd. to W. of SR 15A) 9) Atlantic Ave. Sidewalk (Major Ave. to Marcelle Ave.) Under Construction or Advertised for Construction: 1) Veterans Memorial Bridge (Orange Ave.) – Under construction 2) LPGA Blvd 4-lane widening (Jimmy Ann Dr. to Derbyshire)– Under construction 3) Turnbull Bay Bridge – Contract Awarded 4) Doyle Road paved shoulders (Providence Blvd to Saxon Blvd) – Under Construction 5) Spring to Spring Trail - Grand Ave. (Lemon St. to King St.) – Under Construction 6) ECRRT Segment 5 (Brevard County Line to Cow Creek Rd.) – Design/Build – Under Construction
Near Construction Projects:
Design Projects: 1) ECRRT – Segment 4B (Gobblers Lodge to Maytown Spur) – Design/Build - Design underway 2) Tenth St 4-lane widening (Myrtle to US 1) – Waiting for Railroad and interlocal agreements. 3) ECRRT – Segment 4A (Guise Rd. to Gobblers Lodge) - ROW LAP funded 2013/14, Const. 2017/18 4) Spring to Spring Trail Segment 3A (Detroit Terrace to Rob Sullivan Park) – Design funded 2016/17,
Construction FY 2017/18 5) Spring to Spring Trail- Segment 3B (Rob Sullivan Park to Dirksen Dr) – Design funded 2016/17,
Construction FY 2018/19 6) Orange Camp Rd. 4-lane widening (MLK Blvd. to I-4) – Design 2016/17. Construction funded in FY
2018/2019 7) Old New York paved shoulders (from Shell Rd. to SR 44) – Construction funded FY 20/21 8) Beresford Ave 2-lane Extension (Blue Lake to MLK) 9) W. Park Avenue 3-lane widening (Dale Street to Old Mission Rd) – Design underway 10) Howland Blvd 4-lane widening (Providence Blvd to Elkcam Blvd) –Design Funded FY 2016/17 11) Spring to Spring (DeLeon Springs gap) – Design Funded FY 2016/17 12) Spring to Spring (Lake Beresford to Grand Avenue) – PD&E study –Funded FY 2016/17 13) Doyle Road paved shoulders (Twisted Oak to Courtland Blvd) – Design Funded FY 2016/17,
Construction unfunded 14) Turnbull Bay Road paved shoulders – Construction funded FY 2018/19 15) Doyle Road paved shoulders (Lush Lane to Courtland Blvd) – Construction funded FY 2017/18
*Changes/Updates since last report are underlined. Note: Dates are subject to change due to normal project development issues. Please see Volusia County's road program at http://www.volusia.org/publicworks/ for more information.
110
FLAGLER COUNTY CONSRUCTION REPORTAS OF MAY 2017
Completed 1 Matanzas Woods Parkway Interchange at Interstate 952 Old Kings Road Extension Forest Grove Drive to Matanzas Parkway 3 Flagler County Jail Improvements4 Flagler County Sheriff's Operation Center5 Varn Park Improvements6 Replacement of Three Box Culverts along County Road 3057 Roberts Road Bike/ Pedestrian Path8 County Road 305 Bridge Replacement # 7340869 Bunnell Elementary Trails
10 John Anderson Widening and Resurfacing11 Palm Coast Parkway 6 Laning (Boulder Rock Drive to Florida Park Drive)12 County Road 302 Resurfacing from County Road 305 to SR 10013 Florida Agricultural Museum Improvements
Construction Phase and Near Construction1 Old Kings Road South Widening and Resurfacing from SR 100 to Volusia County Line2 County Road 2009 Design & Construction Resurfacing from County Road 305 to Lake Disston3 SR A1A Landscaping4 County Road 13 - Widening and Resurfacing from County Road 205 to US 15 County Road 205 Design for Widening and Resurfacing from SR 100 to County Road 13 - Design Completed6 Dune Restoration 7 Princess Place - Island House Bridge8 Plantation Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility
Design Phase1 County Road 305 Widening and Resurfacing from bridge # 734006 to SR 1002 County Road 305 Widening and Resurfacing from bridge # 734086 to 7340843 Old Dixie Highway Widening and Resurfacing4 Mahogany Blvd. Resurfacing5 North Mala Compra Drainage Basin Improvements 6 Colbert Lane7 Briarwood Drive8 County Road 2006 Resurfacing9 Bay Drive Park
Planning Phase1 County Road 304 Resurfacing from County Road 305 to SR5 (US1)2 Durrance Lane from Shedd lane to Flagler County line3 Old Haw Creek from County Road 304 to SR 114 Old Kings Road Box Culverts5 Otis Stone from County Road 13 to US 16 Water Oak Road from County Road 2006 to Mahogany Blvd.
111
MEETING SUMMARY CAC & TCC
MAY 16, 2017
VI. STAFF COMMENTS ® Update on SunRail ® Update on the I-95 to SR 417 Connector Environmental Study
VII. CAC/TCC MEMBER COMMENTS
VIII. INFORMATION ITEMS ® April 26, 2017 River to Sea TPO Board Meeting Summary ® April 2017 TPO Outreach and Events ® National Trails Day Flyer
IX. ADJOURNMENT
________________________________________________________________________________________
***The next meetings of the CAC & TCC will be on June 20, 2017*** ________________________________________________________________________________________
112
River to Sea TPO Board
Meeting Summary April 26, 2017
• Approved the consent agenda items as amended including the approval of the March 22, 2017 TPO Board meeting minutes, approval of expenditure for the Alternative Intersection Design report for the SR 44 and Mission Drive/Wallace Road/Canal Street Feasibility Study and approval of expenditure for the development of a fixed route service implementation plan for Flagler County
• Approved a request from Volusia County to increase funding for the construction phase of the Doyle Road paved shoulders project
• Approved a request from South Daytona to increase funding for the construction phase of the Big Tree Road Shared Use Path
• Received a TPO staff presentation of the draft R2CTPO’s Title VI and Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Plans
• Received a PowerPoint presentation on the updates to the Florida Greenways and Trail System (FGTS) Plan and the Opportunity and Priority maps
• Received a TPO staff presentation on the project applications received from the annual Call for Projects
• Received a PowerPoint presentation of Pedestrian Crash Statistics
• Received a PowerPoint presentation of Sea Level Rise/Storm Surge/Resiliency Study
• Received a PowerPoint presentation of the Flagler Bicycle and Pedestrian School Safety Review Studies (Part 2)
• Received the FDOT report
• Received the Executive Director’s report providing an update the I-95 to SR 417 Connector Environmental Study; additional updates to be sent in follow up email
• Received board member comment reminding members that comments on the Bus Stop Improvement Plan are due April 28, 2017
113
Items Requiring Follow Up:
• Executive Director to send the report from Mr. Mighk Wilson, MetroPlan Orlando, on pedestrian
crashes that he presented at the Central Florida MPO Alliance meeting last week
• Executive Director to send follow up email detailing items not covered under Executive Director comments
The next River to Sea TPO Board meeting will be on Wednesday, May 24, 2017
114
TPO Outreach & Activities Completed in April 2017
TPO Presentation to the ISB Coalition
Date: Monday, April 24, 2017 Location: MetroPlan Orlando Description: TPO staff gave a presentation to the ISB Coalition on Transportation and Tourism
Announcement: The TPO's draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Maps are available for public review and comment on the TPO's website at:
http://www.r2ctpo.org/bicycle-pedestrian-program/draft-bicycle-pedestrian-plan/
MPO Advisory Council (MPOAC) Meeting
Date: Thursday, April 6, 2017 Location: Cocoa Beach Description: TPO staff attended the MPO Advisory Council meeting
Central Florida MPO Alliance (CFMPOA) Meeting
Date: Friday, April 21, 2017 Location: MetroPlan Orlando
Description: TPO staff attended the Central Florida MPO Alliance meeting
Earth Day Press Release
Date: Saturday, April 22, 2017 Description: The TPO issued a press release in recognition of Earth Day 2017
River to Sea TPO Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan Public Workshops:
May 10: River to Sea TPO Conference Room, 5:00 – 6:30 p.m.
May 11: Palm Coast City Hall, Council Chambers, 5:00 – 6:30 p.m.
May 12: Volusia County Administration Center, 1st Floor Training Room, 5:00 – 6:30 p.m.
June 3: National Trails Day – TPO Bicycle Helmet Fitting, Lake Beresford Park
June 16: CFMPOA Meeting (Joint meeting with the West Florida Chairs Coordinating Committee), MetroPlan Orlando
June/July: Dates TBD: Volusia County Summer School Helmet Fittings
July 17-18: Flagler County Summer School Program Helmet Fittings, Flagler County
· Update of the TPO’s Citizens Guide to the R2CTPO · Storm Surge Vulnerability/Resiliency Assessment · Flagler Bicycle/Pedestrian School Safety Review
Studies · Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan · General Planning Consultant (GPC) Consultant
Selection · Thompson Creek Trail Feasibility Study · Crash Analysis Report · Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Masterplan
Phase 2 Consultant Selection · Development of TPO Priority Project Lists · SR 44 @Mission Rd/Wallace Rd/Canal St Alternative
Intersection Analysis Design Study · Update to the TPO Title VI and Limited English
Proficiency (LEP) Plans · Website Upgrade and Ongoing Support Services
Consultant Selection · Development of the FY 2017/18 – 2021/22
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
115
May 12, 2017 Media contact: Pat Kuehn, CPRC Community Information Specialist 386-822-5062, ext. 12934 Lake Beresford Park hosts Trails Day celebration
Get your heart pumping and your feet moving as you celebrate Volusia County’s growing trails system on National Trails Day, Saturday, June 3. Volusia County’s Parks, Recreation and Culture Division will sponsor an outdoor family event from 9 a.m. to noon at Lake Beresford Park, 2100 Fatio Road, DeLand. The celebration will be set up near the trailhead to park’s 1.8-mile multi-use trail and the county’s Spring-to-Spring Trail. County staff will lead a guided nature hike and walking tour through the picturesque park, while the River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization will give away free children’s bicycle helmets. Vendors and local environmental organizations will have informational displays.
National Trails Day is promoted by the American Hiking Society to promote the importance of trails in the United States. The county’s major trail systems are the Spring-to-Spring Trail and the East Central Regional Rail Trail. When finished, the Spring-to-Spring Trail will stretch 26 miles from DeLeon Springs State Park to Gemini Springs Park, and the Rail Trail will cover 52 miles from Deltona to Edgewater with a 10-mile leg to Titusville. Once the links are completed, the trails will become part of the five-county St. Johns River-to-Sea Loop. For more information about Trails Day, call 386-736-5953. Learn more about the county’s trails system at www.volusia.org/trails. - 30 -
116
117