cable regulation in an evolving ip world

25
1 Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World Washington Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors Spring Conference – Chelan, WA May 1-2, 2014 Brian T. Grogan, Esq. 612-877-5340 [email protected]

Upload: huela

Post on 14-Jan-2016

32 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World. Washington Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors Spring Conference – Chelan, WA May 1-2, 2014 Brian T. Grogan, Esq. 612-877-5340 [email protected]. Cable Marketplace. Homes Passed130.7 M Basic Cable Subscribers57.3 M - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World

1

Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World

Washington Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors

Spring Conference – Chelan, WA

May 1-2, 2014

Brian T. Grogan, Esq.

612-877-5340

[email protected]

Page 2: Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World

Cable Marketplace• Homes Passed 130.7 M • Basic Cable Subscribers 57.3 M • Basic Cable Penetration 44.4% • Homes Passed by Internet 125.4 M• High Speed Internet subs 50.3 M • Cable Phone subs 26.7 M• 2011 cable operator revenue

– Video revenue = $57 B– Broadband/telephone revenue = $41 B

• No programming costs for non-video services

Source: SNL Kagan – NCTA website (visited August 2013)

2

Page 3: Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World

Marketplace Challenges• Decreasing Subscriber Base

– Over the top (OTT) competition– Satellite and telephone competition

– Franchise Fees paid by cable $3.2 B (2011 est.) • Cable “gross revenues” Nearly Flat

– Subscribers decreasing– Rates increasing– Is the “cable pie” getting smaller?

• Will 2015 franchise fees = $3.2 B

3

Page 4: Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World

Chromecast OTT Video Device$35

4

Page 5: Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World

OTT Devices

• Chromecast• Apple TV, • Boxee Box (with Live

TV dongle), • Xbox 360 (with

Kinect), • Nintendo Wii, • Roku XDS, • Seagate GoFlex TV,

• Sony PS3, • Logitech Revue, • Sony SMP-N200, • TiVo Premiere, • ViewSonic NexTV, • WD TV Live, • OnLive • All DVD players

5

Page 6: Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World

OTT Platforms

6

Page 7: Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World

OTT Platforms

• Netflix, • Hulu Plus, • HBO GO, • iTunes, • VUDU, • Zune Video, • Amazon Prime

Streaming, • DISH/Blockbuster

• Sony PlayStation Network,

• Google TV, • MLB.TV, • EPIX, UFC, • ESPN, • YouTube, • EPIXHD, • OnLive and others.

7

Page 8: Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World

Impact of OTT on Renewal• Limited ability to communicate with OTT

subs• Reduced consideration

– Franchise fees– PEG fees– I-Net

• Same burden on ROWs – limited regulation

8

Page 9: Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World

Regulating Cable When City is “not” in Renewal

• Six steps you should take during the franchise term

• Don’t wait until renewal to worry about compliance

• Delaying enforcement is not helpful to City position

9

Page 10: Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World

10

Periodic Franchise Fee Audits

• Are you collecting the correct amount of revenue?

• “Gross Revenue” definition– Fee on Fee– Advertising, home shopping, non-subscriber

revenue– Launch fees– Bundled rates

• Annexation

Page 11: Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World

11

Bonds, Letters of Creditand Security Funds

• Does your franchise require these?– Do you know where they are?– Have they expired?– Are the levels of coverage accurate?

• Has anyone reviewed the terms– Notification– Statute of limitations– Waivers

• Don’t wait until you need to enforce franchise

Page 12: Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World

12

Customer Service Standards

• Do you have unique standards in your franchise?– You can impose FCC standards

• What reports is the operator required to submit?

• Are you enforcing compliance?• Adopt separate ordinance?

Page 13: Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World

13

Technical Audits

• When was the last tech audit conducted?

• Is the system in compliance with all local, state and federal standards?– Unique franchise provisions– National Electric Safety Code– Separation of facilities– Grounding– FCC Technical Standards

• Health, safety and welfare at stake

Page 14: Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World

14

PEG Programming

• How many channels are required under your franchise?– Triggers?

• What level of capital funding?– Timing of payments– Verification

• Two-way capacity and I-Nets

Page 15: Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World

15

Free Service Drops

• Have you read the franchise requirement?– What level of free service?– Does it include equipment?

• Are all eligible institutions hooked up?• Does the franchise impose distance

limitations?

– How are they measured?

Page 16: Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World

16

PEG Fee• The term "franchise fee" does not include:

– Capital costs which are required by the franchise to be incurred by the cable operator for public, educational, or governmental access facilities.- 47 U.S.C. § 542

• What is a capital cost?– Depreciable asset– Fixed, one-time expense– Land, buildings, construction, equipment – Total cost needed to bring a project to a commercially operable

status

• Is that what the Cable Act intended?• What is a capital cost in the production of a

television show or movie?– Total cost of production – including labor, production and marketing

Page 17: Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World

PEG Fee

• Who pays for the equipment required to deliver a PEG HD signal?– After it leaves city hall – demarcation point– Is city responsible for production equipment?– Is operator responsible for transport?– Are all of the these costs “capital”?

• PEG signals transported over an I-Net– Is the I-Net a PEG capital cost?– Is I-Net management a capital cost?

17

Page 18: Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World

Offsets From Franchise Fee

• PEG fees offset from franchise fees?– Operator may seek language to allow “offset”– Based upon 47 USC 542 “Capital v. operational”– Watch out for:

• “as permitted under federal law” or• “So long as payment of PEG fees does not serve to

reduce the amount of franchise fees paid to City”• If an operator offsets fees what can City do?

– Violation proceeding?– Court challenge?– Contract terms are critical

18

Page 19: Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World

Schools and Public Buildings

• How many free drops are in place today?

• How many additional outlets are in use?– Has digital conversion occurred?– Is equipment required for every TV set?

• Who pays for equipment and service?• Existing drops v. new drops

– Construction cost allocation for new drops• Can operator offset all in-kind costs?

– From franchise fees?– Operator will cite FCC 621 Order

19

Page 20: Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World

20

Institutional Network “I-Net”

• A communication network which is constructed or operated by the cable operator

• Generally available only to subscribers who are not residential subscribers §611(f) [531(f)]

• A franchising authority may require as part of a cable operator’s proposal for a franchise renewal – that channel capacity . . . on institutional

networks be designated for educational or governmental use, and

– may require rules and procedures for the use of the channel capacity designated pursuant to this section. 47 U.S.C. §531(b).

Page 21: Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World

Institutional Network “I-Net”

• In practice an I-Net is typically:

– a dedicated network built by an operator– used by a city free of charge or at a low cost – for voice, video and data transmissions

• Operators may want to convert I-Nets to: – commercial services contracts - increase

profits– can the operator “mandate” a commercial

contract?

21

Page 22: Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World

22

Can an Operator Say NOto a Requested I-Net?

• Cable operator usually cites to: Cable Act §621(b) [541(b)]

A franchising authority may not impose any requirement that has the purpose or effect of prohibiting, limiting, restricting, or conditioning the provision of a telecommunications service by a cable operator or an affiliate thereof.

• Cities should look to: Cable Act §621(b) [541(b)]

Except as otherwise permitted by sections 611 and 612, a franchising authority may not require a cable operator to provide any telecommunications service or facilities, other than institutional networks, as a condition of the initial grant of a franchise, a franchise renewal, or a transfer of a franchise.

Page 23: Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World

23

Customer ServiceSimple path

-Use FCC standards in franchise-Look to both

• 47 C.F.R. § 76.309 and• 76.1601 - 1604 (notices)– Reporting/enforcement - not in FCC regs• Specify in franchise or city code

Aggressive path - Adopt separate Customer Service

Ordinance• Part of city code

Page 24: Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World

Competitive Equity• Operator will demand Level Playing Field

language– Nothing in federal law requires such a provision– Check for state obligation

• Why should the city agree to any language more burdensome than state or federal law?

• Fairness?• Issues to watch for in proposed language

– “Opt-out” provisions that allow operator to avoid franchise obligations without city approval

– “Line item veto” - allows the operator to unilaterally modify franchise if different than competing franchise

– Consider “all or nothing” approach• operator can have the same terms as the competitor• but it must take all requirements – no pick and choose

24

Page 25: Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World

25

Thank You!Brian T. Grogan, Esq.

Moss & Barnett4800 Wells Fargo Center90 South Seventh Street

Minneapolis, MN 55402-4129Phone: 612-877-5340

Facsimile: 612-877-5999E-mail: [email protected]

Web site: www.lawmoss.com