c. j. dobratz -- heat capacities of organic vapors.pdf

Upload: treissy-alejandro

Post on 02-Jun-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/11/2019 C. J. Dobratz -- Heat Capacities of Organic Vapors.pdf

    1/4

    June, 1941 I N D U S T R I A L A N D E N G I N E E R I N G C H E M I S T R Y 759

    On the other hand, the low percentage of limiting-assay crudes

    may merely strengthen the arguments of those who, in scout-

    ing the predicted exhaustion of petroleum, contend th at the

    production of crude oil

    is

    by no means a finished process, and

    that new crudes are always being formed within the earth.

    Acknowledgment

    The author is indebted to his associates, particularly to

    D.

    W. Gould and 8.

    .

    Macuga, for supplying much of the

    original data, and to the former for locating several of the

    references cited. Both contributed helpful criticism and dis-

    cussion of the theories advanced.

    Literature

    Cited

    1) Birch, 8.

    F.,

    Dunstan, A. E.,

    idler, F. A., Pim,

    F.

    B.,

    and

    Tait,

    T., IND.NQ.CHEM.,1, 1079 (1939).

    (2)Bur. of

    Mines, Bull.

    291 (1928), 01 (1937);

    Tech. Papw

    346

    (1925);

    Circ.

    6014 (1926); Repts. Znveatigations 2202, 2235,

    2290, 2293 (1921); 2322, 2364, 2416 (1922); 2595, 2608

    (1924); 2807, 2808, 2824, 2846 (1927); 3253 (1934); 3346

    (1937).

    Candea, C., and Sauoiuc, L., Refiner

    Natural

    Gasoline Mfr. 18.

    434 (1939).

    11928>.

    Cross,

    Roy,

    Kansas

    City Testing Lab., BuU.

    25, 284

    et seq.

    .----,

    Egloff, Gustav, Lowry, C. D., Jr., and Schaad, R. E., J. Inst.

    Petroleum Tech. 16, 133 (1930).

    Egloff, Gustav,

    Nelson,

    E. F., and Morrell,

    J.

    C., IND. NO.

    CHEM.,29, 555 (1937).

    Hall,

    F.

    C.,

    nd Nash,

    A.

    W., J .

    Inst. Petroleum Tech.

    24, 471

    (1938).

    Haslam,

    R.

    T.,nd Russell, R.

    P.,

    IND. NO.C H ~ M . ,2, 1030

    (1930).

    Houdry, E., Burt, W. F., Pew, A. F., Jr., and Peters, W.

    A.

    Jr.,

    Proc. Am . Petroleum Inst. 111,19, 133 (1938).

    Ipatieff,

    V.

    N.,

    nd Egloff,

    Gustav,

    Natl . Petroleum News

    May

    16, 1935.

    Ipatieff, V. N.,

    and

    Grosse, A.

    V.,

    IND.

    NO.

    CHEM.,28, 461

    (1936).

    Peterkin,

    A. G.,

    Bates, J.

    R. and Broom,

    H. P.,

    preprint of

    paper presented before Am. Petroleum

    Inst.,

    Nov. 17, 1939.

    Rittman, W. .,Dutton, C.B.,nd Dean, E. W., Bur. of Mines,

    Snelling,

    W. O. U.

    S. Patent 1,624,848 April 12, 1927).

    BUZZ. 114, 8-64 (1916).

    PRISINTIUDnder the tit le Petroleum Equilibria before the Division of

    Petroleum Chemistry at the 100th Meeting of the Amerioan Chemioal

    Society,

    Detroit,

    Mioh.

    Heat Capacities of Organic Vapors

    CARROLL J.

    DOBRATZ,

    University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio

    The method of calculating heat capacities of or-

    ganic vapors from valence-bonding frequencies as

    developed by Bennewitz and Rossner ( I ) has been

    modified by the assumption of rotation within the

    molecule so as to give more accurate results. Fre-

    quencies have been assigned to valence bondings

    with halogens, nitrogen, and sulfur which, when

    used with those originally assigned to carbon, hy-

    drogen, and oxygen bondings, enable the calcula-

    tion of the heat capacities of the vapors of prac-

    tically all organic compounds formed from these

    elements. The values of the Einstein functions at

    different temperatures corresponding to the as-

    signed frequencies have been fitted to equations

    of the form, - A BT

    CTp,

    so as to simplify

    computations.

    An

    illustration shows the method

    of calculating heat capacities, and comparison of

    calculated and experimental data indicates that

    an accuracy within 5 per cent can be expected in

    most cases.

    CCORDING to the work of Bennewits and Rossner

    ( I ) ,

    the heat capacities of the vapors of organic com-

    A pounds containing carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen can

    be calculated by the following equation:

    n - - Z*iC

    1)

    zqi

    C v ) p

    -

    =

    3R

    +

    where

    R

    = gas constant per mole

    n = number of atoms in molecule

    8 = number of valence bonds of ith type

    yi, Csj = Einstein functions for a given bond

    having

    characteristic frequencies

    v i and bi .

    The Einstein function to be used in this case

    is

    the deriva-

    tive of energy with respect to temperature:

    where X = hv/lcT

    h = Planck's constant

    v = characteristic frequency

    I = gas constant Eer molecule

    T

    = temperature, K.

    e

    =

    base of natural logarithms

    The Y frequencies were evaluated from Raman data, and

    the 6 frequencies were determined empirically from experi-

    mental data previously obtained

    ( 1 ) .

    I n order to simplify

    the computations, values of Einstein functions corresponding

    to the given frequencies were listed at

    40

    intervals from

    290 to 690 K. The expression,

    which is derived from Berthelot's equation

    of

    state

    I J ) ,

    was

    used to convert values of

    (CJP

    -

    t o

    the more commonly

    used form (CJ,

    .

    Hea t capacities calculated by this method

    were found to agree within 5 per cent with the experimental

    data for a large number of compounds containing carbon,

    hydrogen, and oxygen, mostly obtained a t the same tem-

    perature, 410' K.

    However, when the hea t capacities of propane, butane, and

    pentane were calculated and compared with the experimental

    data of Sage, Webster, and Lacey

    ( I @ ,

    the differences were

    much greater than 5 per cent at low temperatures (Table I).

    This error is probably due to the fac t tha t this method takes

    no account of rota tion within the molecule. The assumption

  • 8/11/2019 C. J. Dobratz -- Heat Capacities of Organic Vapors.pdf

    2/4

    760 I N D U S T R I A L A N D E N G I N E E R I N G C H E M I S T R Y

    Vol.

    33,

    No.

    6

    of internal rotation has been frequently used, and recent

    work on the ethane molecule tends t o bear out the validity

    of the assumption. Several workers (4, 10 11,

    17)

    con-

    ducted thorough investigations, and closest agreement of

    theoretically calculated values of the thermodynamic func-

    tions for ethane with experimental data was obtained by

    assuming restricted internal rotation

    of

    the methyl groups,

    using a restricting potential of approximately 3000 calories

    per molecule. This restricting potent ial will allow virtually

    free rotation at temperatures above 250 K. According

    t o

    Pitzer I 4 ) , the restricting potentials for the internal rota-

    tions of larger hydrocarbon molecules are of approximately

    the same magnitude, and therefore the assumption of free ro-

    tation about carbon-carbon single bonds should be valid for

    all temperatures above 300 K.

    T A B L ~. HEATCAPACITIES

    F

    HYDROCARBONS

    CP

    at

    1

    atm.. cal./(mol.)(O

    K.)

    70'

    F.

    160' F. 250

    F.

    340'

    F.

    Hydroaarbon Souroem 294O

    K.

    344O

    K.

    394O

    K.

    444O

    K.

    Propane

    a 1 7 . 8 1 9 . 2 2 0 . 8 2 2 . 3

    b

    1 6 . 7 1 8 . 5 2 0 . 9 2 3 . 3

    1 6 .9 1 9 .0 2 1 .1 2 3 .4

    :

    1 5 .8 1 8 .1 2 0 .4 2 3 .0

    n-Butane a

    2 2 .9 2 4 .8 2 7 .0 2 9 .8

    b

    2 1 .4 2 4 .0 2 7 .2 3 0 .6

    2 1 .3 2 4 .2 2 6 .9 2 9 .9

    19.8 2 2 .9 2 6 .0 2 9 .4

    n-Pentane a .

    3 0 .6 3 3 .1 3 6 .8

    b b . . . 2 9 . 8 3 3 . 5 3 7 . 3

    0 ... 2 9 . 4 3 2 . 8 3 6 . 6

    d

    . . 2 7 . 8 3 2 . 0 3 5 . 9

    a

    a

    = experimental values

    of

    Sage, Webster, and Lacey.(ib);

    b =

    calcu-

    lated by method of Pitzer

    14) ;

    c = calculated from Equatlon

    2;

    d = calcu-

    lated from Equation 1.

    E Neopentane.

    The average effect

    of

    the 6 vibrations as used in Equat ion 1

    is

    0 .5

    calorie per degree of freedom for hydrocarbons a t

    20 C. increases to approximately 1 calorie a t

    150'

    C., and

    finally approaches a limiting value of 2 calories at higher

    temperatures. The heat capacity due

    t o

    a rotat ional degree

    of

    freedom is

    R / 2

    or 1 calorie at all temperatures. Thus, at

    137 C.

    (410 K.),

    the temperature a t which Bennewitz

    and Rossner 1 ) obtained their experimental data, little

    error would be produced by substituting a vibrational for a

    rotational degree

    of

    freedom; but this error would appear a t

    all other temperatures, since calculated heat capacities are

    too low a t lower temperatures and too high at higher tem-

    peratures. As Table I shows, heat capacities calculated by

    Equation 1 agree within 5 per cent with experimental data

    in the neighborhood of

    410

    K. but are too small at

    the lower-temperatures. The assumption of free

    rotation about carbon-carbon bonds in the mole-

    cule with a corresponding decrease in the number

    of vibrational degrees of freedom would tend to

    correct this error.

    It

    is therefore suggested tha t

    Equation 1be corrected

    so

    as to include internal

    rotation.

    THE changed equation

    is

    as follows:

    a

    =

    number of bonds permitting free rotation,

    In the same manner as for Equation 1

    Berthelot's equation of state can be used to ob-

    tain values of C , at finite pressures from the cal-

    culated values of (Cv )p

    0 .

    C C

    r similar (C-0 in ethers or esters)

    The assumption of internal rotation has also been used in

    the method of calculating heat capacities and other thermo-

    dynamic functions as developed by Pitzer

    (14) .

    In this

    method, which has been applied only t o hydrocarbons, heat

    capacities are also determined by a summation of Einstein

    functions corresponding to the vibrational frequencies

    of

    the

    molecule. Approximately the same frequencies are used as

    those employed by Bennewitz and Rossner

    I ) ,

    but the num-

    ber of degrees of freedom to be assigned each vibrational

    TABLE1. HEATCAPACITIES

    F

    ORGANICOMPOUNDS

    CP

    t

    1

    atm ., cal./(mol.)(O K.)

    Eaperi- Calcd, by Calcd, by

    Compound Temp., O

    K.

    mentala Equatlon 1 Equation 2

    Acetone

    Methyl ethyl ketor

    Benzene

    Toluene

    Methylcyolohexane

    ie

    410

    410

    410

    410

    410

    410

    437

    623

    341

    376

    410

    454

    410

    410

    410

    410

    2 7 .5

    2 7 .9

    3 9 . 4

    3 2 .9

    3 3 . 3

    1 9 .8

    2 0 .9

    2 8 . 2

    2 0 . 1

    2 1 .7

    2 2 .5

    2 3 .9

    2 9 . 8

    2 7 . 3

    3 3 . 6

    4 4 .5

    2 7 .3

    2 7 . 3

    3 9 . 6

    3 2 . 1

    3 2 .1

    2 0 . 0

    2 1 . 0

    2 7 . 1

    1 9 . 8

    2 1 . 3

    2 2 . 8

    2 4 . 6

    2 8 . 8

    2 7 . 3

    3 3 . 6

    4 4 . 8

    2 7 .3

    2 7 .3

    3 9 . 9

    3 2 .7

    3 2 .7

    2 0 .1

    2 1 .1

    2 6 .8

    2 0 . 4

    2 1 . 8

    2 3 .2

    2 4 .7

    2 9 .3

    2 7 . 3

    3 3 .6

    4 4 . 9

    a

    The experimental values at

    410' K.

    were obtained by Bennewitz and

    Rossner

    1 ) ;

    values at other temperatures were taken from Landolt-BRrn-

    stein

    (fa).

    frequency in a molecule is determined from a more elaborate

    analysis of the structural formula, a separate analysis being

    required for each different compound. Internal rotation

    about carbon-carbon bonds in the molecule is assumed, re-

    stricting potentials being such as t o allow practically free ro-

    tation a t temperatures above 300 K. Heat capacities cal-

    culated by this method for propane, butane, and pentane

    are also listed in Table I and show closer agreement with

    the experimental da ta than do those calculated by Equation 1.

    Since Pitzer (14 ) also used approximately the same fre-

    quencies as the ones assigned by Bennewitz and Rossner

    I ) ,

    those of the latt er were assumed

    t o

    be correct and were used

    t o determine the Einstein functions for calculations with

    Equation 2 .

    As

    Table I shows, heat capacities calculated

    by means of Equation 2 for propane, butane, and pentane

    agree as well with the experimental data as do those calcu-

    lated by Pitzer's method and considerably better than do

    values calculated by Equation

    1.

    Also, heat capacities

    calculated for various other compounds (Table 11) show as

    TABLE11.

    BONDIXQ

    REQUENCIES

    ND

    CONSTANTS T O EVALUATEINSTEIN

    FUNCTIONS,

    , = A

    BT

    CTa

    Y Fre-

    6 Fre-

    quenoy uency,

    Bonding Cm.-l

    A

    B

    X 108 C X 10s %m.-1

    A

    B

    x

    103 c x

    106

    c-I

    900 0.181 4 .664 -3 .338 260 1 .461 1 .730 -1 ,272

    S

    C B r

    560 -0 .073 5 .158 -3 .59; 280 1 .242 2 .046 -1 ,501

    C-Cl.

    6 50 -0 .5 6 2 6 .3 8 5 -4 .4 9 5 350 1.023 2 .590 -1 ,874

    c-s

    C-C.

    990

    -1 ,0 9 0

    6 .000 - 3 . 4 4 1

    390 0.73 0 3.414 -2.577

    C-0

    1030

    -1 ,1 7 3

    6 .132 -3 .555 205 1 .461 1 .63 3

    -1 .414

    C-F

    1050

    -1 .128 5 .845 -3 .253

    530 0 .011 5 .119 -3 .690

    c c

    1620

    -0 ,4 3 2 1 .2 3 3 0 .9 3 6 846

    -1 ,1 4 0 7 .2 5 4 -4 .93 6

    C-0

    1700

    -0 ,3 2 4 0 ,7 2 4 1 .3 0 8

    390 0 ,7 3 0 3 .41 4 -2 .5 7 7

    C-N,

    N-N

    N L O

    C L S

    N L Q

    C L N

    S-H 2570

    0 ,1 2 9 -1 .3 3 3

    2.26 3 1050 -1,1 28

    5.845 -3.2533

    C-H

    2920

    0 ,2 2 9 -1 .2 2 4

    1 658 1320 -0,938

    3 .9 0 0 -1 .3 4 2

    0-H 3420

    0 .1 5 0 -0 .8 1 0

    1.055 1150

    -1 ,1 3 5 5 .3 6 3

    - 2

    740

    N--IK

  • 8/11/2019 C. J. Dobratz -- Heat Capacities of Organic Vapors.pdf

    3/4

    June, 1941 I N D U S T R I A L A N D E N G I N E E R I N G C H E M I S T R Y 761

    good as, or better agreement with experimental data than

    do those calculated from Equation 1 by Bennewitz and

    Rossner 1).

    To illustrate the method of computat ion by Equation 2, a

    sample calculation of the hea t capacity of acetone is pre-

    sented. Quadratic equations of the form,

    C =

    A

    BT CT2

    as suggested by Fugassi and Rudy (6), re used to evaluate

    the Einstein functions; the constants for the different bond-

    ing frequencies are listed in Table

    111.

    6

    C-H bonds, 2 C-C bonds, 1 C=O bond;

    Zqi

    = 9;

    n = 1 0 ; a = 2

    e

    From the structural formula for acetone we find:

    3n 6 a

    Zqi 2

    zqi

    - 9

    Summing up the equations for the different bonds,

    For C-C:

    2

    Cv

    2(--1.090

    4

    6.000

    X

    3.441

    X

    10-O 2

    26.

    For

    0:

    13 13

    a =

    -g- (+0.730 3.414

    X lo-'

    T 2.577 X lo-' Ta)

    9

    For C-H:

    6 Cv

    =

    6(+0.229 1.224 X T 1.658

    X

    IO-

    T )

    26

    2 6 Ca = -0.938 3.900 X

    9 3

    2 2

    c6

    9

    9

    $0.730 3.414 X

    T 2.577

    X

    lo-' T*)

    Cv

    =

    (-0.324 0.724 X

    lo-'

    T

    1.308 X Tp)

    T

    -

    1.342 X TI)

    Z*JVi + 3n 6 a -

    zqdc&

    zqi

    - 6.10 54.01 X lodaT - 18.43 X 10-6

    T

    aR

    3R 7.95

    2

    C,),,o 1.85 54.01

    X

    T 18.43

    X

    10-6 T s

    For acetone:

    pc

    = 47 atm.; T, = 508 K.

    = 1.2 x 107/~8 at p = 1 atm.)

    32

    pe

    Thus,

    (CP) , - I

    = 2.4

    X

    107/Ta 3.84

    54.01

    X

    10-8

    T

    - 18.43

    X

    10-6 T

    From this equation we obtain

    C

    for acetone a t

    410

    K. and

    1 atmosphere pressure as 23.2 calories/(mol.)

    (

    K.) as com-

    pared with the experimental value of 22.5 calories I),

    a

    difference of

    3

    per cent.

    SINCE Equation 2 gives apparently accurate results for all

    organic compounds containing carbon, hydrogen, and oxy-

    gen, it should also be applicable to organic compounds con-

    taining other elements, if the proper frequencies are

    asso-

    ciated with t he valence bondings.

    The frequencies assigned by Bennewitz and Rossner 1)

    should

    also

    be valid for the same bonds in compounds which

    contain elements other than carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen.

    Since these frequencies agree quite well with the average

    values for the bondings

    as

    tabulated from Raman data by

    Hibben

    (8), t

    was assumed that the average frequencies

    as obtained from Raman data for organic bonds with halo-

    gens, sulfur, and nitrogen could be used to evaluate Einstein

    functions for use in Equat ion 2. The v and 6 requencies to be

    associated with the various bonds are listed in Table 111.

    Also given are equations

    of

    the form C,, A

    BT

    CTZ,

    which can be used to evaluate the Einstein functions corre-

    sponding to the given frequencies. These equations were

    fitted

    by

    the method of averages to the values of the Einstein

    functions at different temperatures as obtained from the

    tabulated values in Landolt-Bornstein

    (18)

    . Deviations of

    values of t he quadra tic form from true values are less than

    1.5 per cent in the range 300' to 700 K .

    The frequencies for carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen bondings

    are those given by Bennewitz and Rossner 1). Those for

    bonds involving chlorine, iodine, bromine, and sulfur are as

    given by Hibben

    8)

    from Raman data. The frequencies for

    the carbon-fluorine bonding were estimated by t he author

    from Raman data

    as

    reported by Glockler and co-workers

    (7).

    Since there is little change in th e Raman spectra when a

    nitrogen atom replaces a, carbon atom in an organic mole-

    cule, carbon bonding frequencies were used instead of those

    given for nitrogen bondings by Raman data. This decreases

    the number of equations needed for computations and will

    not materially affect the accuracy of t he results obtained.

    There are not sufficient experimental heat-capacity data

    available for nitrogen compounds

    t o

    justify more precise as-

    signment of frequencies.

    HEAT capacities for halogenated hydrocarbons were cal-

    culated by means of Equation 2, using these frequencies,

    and show good agreement with experimental data . In Table

    IV these calculated heat capacities are listed along with ex-

    perimental data and with the values calculated from a more

    complete spectroscopic analysis of chlorinated and bromi-

    nated methanes (16, 8). The differences are less than

    5

    per

    cent except for the smaller molecules. This larger error is

    probably due to the method of assigning frequencies.

    In a molecule such as methyl chloride the deformation

    vibrations could be associated with either the hydrogen-car-

    bon-hydrogen or the hydrogen-carbon-chlorine bonding.

    Because of t he differences in mass, neither of these bondings

    will have

    a

    vibrational frequency equivalent to that of

    a

    carbon-carbon-chlorine bonding which is present in all higher

    homologs. This is apparent in the Raman spectra, which

    show no vibrations with a wave number below 712 om.-' for

    methyl chloride, while the assumed 6 frequency for carbon-

    chlorine is

    330

    em.-'. Hence the use

    of

    this

    6

    vibration for

    methyl chloride introduces an error.

    1

    The equations

    for

    the carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen bondings were de-

    rived by Fugasai and Rudy

    8) rom

    the table used by Bennewjtz

    and

    Rossner 1). They were checked by the author and found to be within the

    stated limits

    of

    accuracy.

    TABLE^

    IV. H ~ A T

    APACITIDSF

    HALOQDNATDDYDRO-

    C RBONS

    C p ,

    oal./(mol.)(o K.)

    Compound Temp., 0 Exptl. Calod.

    CHClzF

    40 14.7'3 16.4

    140 17.20 18.4

    CChF

    40 18.8' 19.3

    140 21.2' 21.4

    30.94 30.9

    33.10 33.3

    CClaF-CCLF

    sq

    140

    CZHICL

    110-220 22.7b

    22.0

    CsHsBr

    28-116 17.5b 17.6

    80-200

    20.7b

    20.0

    CaHsCl

    27-118 17.3, 18.1

    120-230 18.7b 19.7

    cclr

    100 21.520 21.4

    400 24.200 24.4

    CHsCl

    25 9.750 11.4

    400 15.63' 16.5

    CBrr

    200 23. od 23.5

    400 24.72d 24.6

    CHaBri

    200

    17.18d 17.7

    400 19.60d 19.5

    a

    Experimental values

    from

    Benning and McHarness

    8 ) .

    b Ex erimental values from International Critioal Tables 0) .

    C

    Cagulated by

    Vold 18).

    d Caloulated by Stevenson and Beach 18).

  • 8/11/2019 C. J. Dobratz -- Heat Capacities of Organic Vapors.pdf

    4/4

    762 I N D U S T R I A L A N D E N G I N E E R I N G C H E M I S T R Y Vol. 33, No.

    6

    In Table

    V

    heat capacities as calculated for mono- and

    dimethylamines are compared with experimental values as

    reported by Felsing and Jessen (6). The largest deviation is

    about

    7

    per cent, but use

    of

    the higher frequencies for nitro-

    gen bonds as given in Raman data, instead of the carbon

    bonding frequencies, would increase this error.

    This method

    of calculation was not expected to give very good results for

    ammonia, but as the values in Table

    V

    show, the differences

    from accepted values are less than 5 per cent.

    TABLE .

    HEATCAPACITIESF NITROGENOMPOUNDS

    C p

    cal./(mol.)(o X.)

    Compound Temp., C. Exptl. Calcd.

    Monomethylamine

    25

    12.90 12.3

    50 13.W

    12.9

    Dimethylamine

    25

    16.65 16.7

    50

    18.70

    17.8

    Ammonia

    23 8.46 8.3

    123 9.26 9. 2

    223 10.06 10.1

    323 10.7b 11.0

    423

    11.36 11.9

    Ex erirnental

    values

    from Felsing and

    Jessrr. 6 ) .

    b C a h a t e d f r o m equations given by Bryant (3;.

    Almost no gaseous heat capacity da ta are available for any

    organic compounds of sulfw and therefore it was not possible

    to obtain much of an experimental check on the frequencies

    assumed for sulfur bondings. However, these frequencies

    were chosen in the same manner as those for halogens and

    should be of comparable accuracy. The one heat capacity

    value found for an organic sulfur compound (that for diethyl

    sulfide, 9) agreed within 2 per cent with the calculated

    value. The calculated heat capacity

    is

    35.5 calories/(mol.)

    K.)

    and the experimental value, 36.2 calories for the range

    120-223

    C.

    Literature Cited

    1) Bennewitz and Rosaner,

    Z .

    physik. Chem. 39B, 126 (1938).

    (2)

    Benning and McHarness,

    IND.

    NG.CHEM.,

    1, 912 (1939).

    (3) Bryant, Ibid . , 25, 820 (1933).

    (4)

    Eucken and Part s, Z . physik. Chem. ZOB,

    184 (1933).

    (5) Felsing and Jessen,

    J . Am.

    Chem. SOC.,

    5 ,

    4418 (1933).

    (6)

    Fugassi and Rudy, IND.NG.CEEN.,

    0,1029 (1938).

    7) Glockler et al., J . Chem. Phys. 7, 278, 382, 669, 970 (1939);

    8,

    291 (1940).

    (8) Hibben, Ram an Effect and I ts Chemical Applications, A. C.

    S. Monograph 80, New York, Reinhold Pub. Corp.,1939.

    (9) International Critical Tables,Vol. V p. 80, New York, MoGraw-

    Hill Book Company,

    1929.

    (10)

    Kemp and Pitzer, J . Am . Chem.Soc.

    59, 276 (1937).

    (11)

    Kistiakowsky and Rice, J . Chem. Phys. , 7 ,

    281 (1939).

    (12) Landolt-Bornatein, Physikalisoh-chemisohe Tabellen,

    Vol.

    11,

    (13) Partington and Shilling, Specific Heats of Gases,

    p

    40,

    New

    ( 1 4 )

    Pitzer,

    J . Chem. Phys.

    5, 47 3 (1937).

    (15) Sage, Webster, and Laoey, IND.ENG.CHPM., 9, 1309 (1937)

    (16)

    Stevenson and Beach,

    J.

    Chem. Phys.

    7, 25 (1939).

    (17) Teller and Topley,

    J .

    Chem. Soc., 1935,885.

    (18)

    Vold, J . Am . Chem.Soc.

    57,1192 (1935).

    p.

    1252,

    Berlin, Julius Springer,

    936.

    York,

    D.

    Van Nostra nd Company,

    1924.

    .4BsTRAoTmD from a thesis presented in June, 1940,

    t o

    the Graduate School of

    the University

    of

    Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements

    for

    the degree

    of

    master

    of

    science. The work

    was

    performed under th e direotion

    of

    E.

    F. Farnau of

    the

    chemioal engineering faculty.

    Reclamation of Stoddard Dry

    J

    Cleaning

    Solvent

    CHARLES

    S. LOWE

    AND

    ADRIAN

    C.

    SMITH

    National Association of Dyers and Cleaners

    Silver Spring,

    Md.

    FTER repeated use dry cleaning solvent becomes con-

    taminated with dirt, fat ty substances from perspiration

    A and soap residues, grease, and oils

    of

    various kinds. The

    insoluble soil consists of suspended matter such as lint, grit,

    sand, dust, and water; the soluble impurities are usually

    of an organic nature, consisting of mineral oils, fa tt y acids,

    wool grease, unsaponified fats, dyes, and to some extent

    various chemicals used in removing stains. The color of the

    originally clear solvent, even though no soap or cleaning aid

    is employed and no dyestuff is removed from the garments,

    passes through shades of light yellow to dark reddish brown

    as the poundage of clothes cleaned inoreases. Peroxides, de-

    rived from the solvent itself by the action of light and from

    oleic acid (the principal fatty acid constituent of dry cleaning

    soaps), decompose and yield aldehydes, ketones, and low-

    molecular-weight acids. Small amounts of such solvent re-

    Present address, Pennsylvania Salt Manufacturing Company, Phila-

    delphia, Penna.

    The adsorptive properties of activated car-

    bon, magnesiu m silicate, and activated

    fullers earths toward fatty acids and sub-

    stances associated with rancidity in dry

    cleaning solvent have been studied in

    laboratory and plant tests. Alkali ab-

    sorption and mineral acid theories of dry

    cleaning soap decomposition are presented

    to

    account for excessive accumulation

    of fatty acids in Stoddard dry cleaning sol-

    vent above that derived from the garments

    thems elves. The effect of soap on the ad-

    sorptive capacity of a powder is pointed o ut .

    maining in the cleaned garments develop unpleasant rancid

    odors. Eventually the solvent becomes so polluted as t o be

    unfit for further application as a cleaning medium.

    Before this condition is reached, it is necessary to clarify

    the solvent by alkali treatment, by pressure filtration with

    adsorbing powders, by vacuum distillation, or by a combina-

    tion of these methods. It is generally held that distillation

    will yield the purest solvent, removing insoluble soil and all

    mineral oils, grease, and fatty acid residues having boiling

    ranges over 410 F.which is the end point of Stoddard solvent.