c-2020
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/8/2019 C-2020
1/20
PDHeng inee r . com
Course C-2020
Steel Beam Design by ASD/LRFD SteelConstruction Man ual
To receive credit for this course
This document is the course text. You may review this material atyour leisure either before or after you purchase the course. Topurchase this course, click on the course overview page:
http://www.pdhengineer.com/pages/C-2020.htm
or type the link into your browser. Next, click on the Take Quiz button
at the bottom of the course overview page. If you already have anaccount, log in to purchase the course. If you do not have aPDHengineer.com account, click the New User Sign Up link to createyour account.
After logging in and purchasing the course, you can take the onlinequiz immediately or you can wait until another day if you have not yetreviewed the course text. When you complete the online quiz, yourscore will automatically be calculated. If you receive a passing score,you may instantly download your certificate of completion. If you donot pass on your first try, you can retake the quiz as many times asneeded by simply logging into your PDHengineer.com account andclicking on the link Courses Purchased But Not Completed.
If you have any questions, please call us toll-free at 877 500-7145.
PDHengineer.com5870 Highway 6 North, Suite 310
Houston, TX 77084Toll Free: 877 500-7145
-
8/8/2019 C-2020
2/20
1
Steel Beam Design byASD/ LRFD Steel Construction Manual
13th Edition
By Duane Nickols
Beams are flexural members that are subjected to shear and bending
moments. The shear and moment vary with position along the beam.
A beams primary function is resisting bending moments. Beamsusually have uniform loads, concentrated loads or both on them. We
will be looking at W shaped members. LRFD stands for Load andResistance Factor Design and was in three previous editions of the
specifications. ASD stands for Allowable Strength Design which issimilar to Allowable Stress Design that many engineers are familiarwith.
Types of loads
-
8/8/2019 C-2020
3/20
2
LRFD Load Combinations (ASCE 7-05)
ASD Load Combinations (ASCE 7-05)
We will analyze first and design later.
Lets say we have a 26 foot long beam that is simply supported ateach end. It supports a live load equal to 0.60 k/ft and a dead load of
0.83 k/ft, including the weight of the beam.
LRFD
ftkipftftkLw
M
k
ftftkLw
V
ftkftkftkLDw
u
u
u
u
u
=
==
=
==
=+=+=
3.1658
)26(/96.1
8
43.252
26/96.1
2
/96.1)/60.06.1()/83.02.1(6.12.1
22
-
8/8/2019 C-2020
4/20
3
ASD
ftkipftftkLw
M
kftftkLw
V
ftkftkftkLDw
a
a
a
a
a
=
==
=
==
=+=+=
8.1208
)26(/43.1
8
59.182
26/43.1
2
/43.1/60.0/83.0
22
Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD)
nunu VVMM andAlso
Chapter F is Design of Members for Flexure
Allow able Strength Design (ASD)
na
n
a
VV
MM andAlso
-
8/8/2019 C-2020
5/20
4
Limit States
We will look at six limit states. The first five are strength limit statesand the last is a serviceability limit state.
Yielding has to do with the strength of the beam to resistbending moments without failure. Yielding depends on the loads,
supports, span and the strength of the steel.
Lateral-Torsional Buckling has to do with the twisting of thebeam in a lateral direction. If the beam is adequately braced, it
will not twist into failure. Web Local Buckling has to do with the strength of the web to
resist failure. This means the width to thickness ratio must fallbetween certain limits so the web will not collapse or fail.
Flange Local Buckling has to do with strength of the flange toresist failure. This means the width to thickness ratio must fallbetween certain limits so the flange will not collapse or fail.
Shear has to do with shear failure of the beam. Chapter Gcovers Design of Members for Shear.
Deflection is a serviceability limit state. This has to do with thebeam deflecting too noticeable to people or so people feel
uncomfortable.
If the un-braced length, (Lb)
-
8/8/2019 C-2020
6/20
5
Cb can be conservatively equal to 1.0Sx comes from the shapes table
Lp and Lr can be found in Table 3-2 for W shapes in the AISC Manual oryou can calculate them from the following equations.
J is in the shapes table.
-
8/8/2019 C-2020
7/20
6
Now lets say the beam we looked at before is a W14 x 30 and theun-braced length is 26 feet. Fy=50 ksi, Sx=42.0 in
3 and Zx=47.3 in3.
Yielding
Since Lb>Lp, it does not meet the limit state of yielding in equation
(F2-1).
ftkipftkipM
ftkipinkipinksiSFM
ftkipftkipM
ftkipinkipinksiZFM
r
xyr
p
xyp
==
====
==
====
110)5.122()9.0(
5.1221470)0.42()50()7.0(7.0
177)197()9.0(
1972365)3.47()50(
3
3
-
8/8/2019 C-2020
8/20
7
LRFD
The Mu was equal to 165.3 kip-ft
From Table 3-2, AISC Manual
Since the required moment, (Mu=165.3 kip-ft) is greater than thedesign moment, (bMr=110 kip-ft) and the un-braced length, (Lb=26
feet) is greater than Lr of 14.9 feet, this will not meet the limit state
for lateral-torsional buckling.
Now, lets say we brace this beam in the middle and at each end. The
un-braced length (Lb = 13 feet). Interpolating between the abovevalues:
ftkipftkipftkipM
ftkipx
ftkipftkip
x
nb ==
=
=
2.12379.53177
79.53
)110177()'26.5'9.14(
)'26.5'0.13(
Now the design moment becomes 123.2 kip-ft. This is less than the
required moment, (Mu=165.3 kip-ft) so it will not work. No Good.
Now lets say we brace this beam at each end and the quarter points.
The un-braced length, (Lb) will be 6.50 feet. Interpolating between theabove values, the design moment, bMn is 168.4 kip-ft. This is greater
than the required moment of 165.3 kip-ft, so this will work. Just bybracing adequately, the beam will not twist into failure (Lateral-
Torsional Bucking).
ftkipM
ftkipM
ftL
ftL
rb
p
r
p
=
=
=
=
110
177
9.14
26.5
b
-
8/8/2019 C-2020
9/20
8
ASD
Again, we will brace the beam at each end and the quarter points. Theun-braced length, (Lb=6.50 feet). Remember from above, Ma=120.8
kip-ft.
ftkipftkipM
ftkipSFM
ftkipftkipM
ftkipZFM
r
xyr
p
xyp
=
=
==
=
=
==
4.7367.1
5.122
5.1227.0
11867.1
197
197
From Table 3-2, for W14 x 30 in the AISC Manual
ftL
ftL
ftkipM
ftkipM
r
p
b
r
b
p
9.14
26.5
4.73
118
=
=
=
=
Since ftkipM
ftkipMb
p
a
=
>= 1188.120 , we need to select another
beam.
Selecting a W16 x 31
-
8/8/2019 C-2020
10/20
9
From Table 3-2, AISC Manual
ftL
ftL
ftkipM
ftkipM
r
p
b
r
b
p
9.11
13.4
5.82
135
=
=
=
=
Interpolating from the above values, ftkipM
b
n =
96.118 which is still No
Good.
Selecting a W14 x 34
From Table 3-2, AISC Manual
ftL
ftL
ftkipM
ftkipM
r
p
b
r
b
p
6.15
4.5
9.84
136
=
=
=
=
Interpolating from the above values for Lb=6.50 feet, ftkipM
b
n =
5.130
which is greater than Ma=120.8 kip-ft. This member is OK.
Conclusion
The LRFD member (W14 x 30) is lighter than the ASD member(W14 x 34) but both are the same depth.
-
8/8/2019 C-2020
11/20
10
Classification of Sections for Local Buck ling
Compact Non-compact Slender-element
For W sectionswwf
f
t
kd
t
h
t
b
t
b 2and
2
===
Flange Local Buckling
It is compact ify
p FE
t
b38.0==
It is non-compact ify
rp FE0.1=
-
8/8/2019 C-2020
12/20
11
Web Local Buckling
It is compact ify
p
wF
Et
h76.3=
It is non-compact ify
r
w
p FE
t
h70.5=
Now the W14 X 30 from LRFD, is it compact, non-compact or a
slender-element?
compactisit15.950
000,2938.038.0
tablewith thechecksthis74.8)385.02(
73.6
2
p ===
=
==
ksiksi
FE
in
in
t
b
y
f
f
-
8/8/2019 C-2020
13/20
12
Now lets check the web.
compactisit6.9050000,2976.376.3
tablein the45.4isit3.45270.0
))785.02(8.13(2
p ===
=
=
=
ksiksiFE
in
inin
t
kd
t
h
y
ww
The W14 X 34 from ASD is also compact. In fact for Fy=50 ksi, most all
W sections have compact flanges. There are only about ten sectionsthat have non-compact flanges.
Shear Strength
Now recall, from page 2 and 3, that our Vu=25.43 kips and V
a=18.59
kips.
LRFD
OKkipskips
kipskipsV
kipsininksiCdtFCAFV
VV
n
vwyvwyn
un
43.25112
11211200.1
1120.1270.08.13506.06.06.0
==
====
ASD
OKkipskips
kipskipsV
VV
n
a
n
59.187.74
7.745.1
112
==
-
8/8/2019 C-2020
14/20
13
Both of these values (
n
n
VV and ) are listed in Table 3-2 of the Steel
Manual. Only about eight W sections dont meet the h/tw requirement.The W14 x 30 from LRFD and the W14 X 34 from ASD meet the h/tw
requirement.
Deflection (serviceability)
Lets say that our deflection limit is L/360. Since our span was 26 feet,L/360=(26 feet X 12 in/ft)/360=0.867 inches. Deflection for themember is based on service loads so that will be the same for LRFD
and ASD. We are using two different W sections so the deflections willbe different.
From page 3, our uniform service load wa=1.43 k/ftFor the W14 X 30 from LRFD, Ix=291 in4
For the W14 X 34 from ASD, Ix=340 in4
LRFD
OKininininlb
ftinftinftftlb
inI
GoodNoininininlb
ftinftinftftlb
EI
wL
x
867.0829.0)612)(/1029(384
)/1226)(12/)(/1430(5
61240,XTry W18
867.074.1)291)(/1029(384
)/1226)(12/)(/1430(5
384
5
426
4
4
426
44
=
==
ASD
The W14 X 34 didnt work but the W18 X 40 will work.
Conclusion
Looking at the strength of the beam to resist bending moment wecame up with two different members. We braced the beam adequately
(Lb=6.5 ft) to resist lateral-torsional buckling. We determined the ASDbeam would be a W14 X 34. The beams were compact so there was noflange local buckling or web local buckling. We checked the shear
strength of both beams and it was OK. The deflection turned out to bethe determining limit state. Based on deflection we would use the
same W section for both LRFD and ASD (W18 X 40).
-
8/8/2019 C-2020
15/20
14
Design W Section, Continuously Braced
Select an ASTM A992 W section simply supported with a span of 35
feet. The beam is continuously braced, so Lb=0 ft. The maximum
depth of the section is 21 inches. The limit on live load deflection isL/360. The uniform dead load is 0.5 kip/ft and the uniform live load is
0.8 kip/ft.
Material properties:
ASTM A992 Fy=50 ksi Fu=65 ksi
LRFD ASD
ftkipM
ftftkipwLM
kipftftkipwL
V
ftkipw
ftkipftkipw
LDw
u
u
a
a
a
a
=
==
=
==
=
+=
+=
199
8
)35()/30.1(
8
75.222
)35()/30.1(
2
/30.1
)/8.0()/5.0(
22
44
max
4
max
794)17.1)(000,29(384
)/1235)(12/)(/8.0(5
384
5
17.1360
)/12()35(
360
ininksi
ftinftinftftkip
E
wLI
inftinftL
req =
=
=
=
==
The Steel Manual has many design aids. Table 3-3, W Shapes by Ix
shows a W21 X 44 with Ix=843 in4 will work. Table 3-2, W Shapes by
Zx shows a W18 X40 will work for LRFD but the Ix is too small. Thetable shows a W21 X 44 will work for ASD and it will work for LRFD.
Table 3-10 shows a W18 X 40 will work for LRFD but the Ix is toosmall. It shows a W21 X 44 will work for ASD and it will also work for
LRFD. Lets select a W21 X 44.
ftkipM
ftftkipwLM
kipftftkipwL
V
ftkipw
ftkipftkipw
LDw
u
u
u
u
u
u
=
==
=
==
=
+=
+=
288
8
)35()/88.1(
8
9.322
)35()/88.1(
2
/88.1
)/8.06.1()/5.02.1(
6.12.1
22
-
8/8/2019 C-2020
16/20
15
ftkipinkipinksiZFM xyn ==== 3984770)4.95)(50(3
LRFD ASD
OKftkipMM
ftkipftkipM
a
n
n
=
=
=
199
23867.1
398
kipininksiCdtFCAFV vwyvwyn 217)1)(350.0)(7.20)(50(6.06.06.0 ====
OKkipVV
kipkipV
an
n
75.22
1455.1
217
=
==
The Steel Manual comes with a CD. On the CD is a beam design
program. Here is the same example using that program for LRFD andASD.
OKftkipMM
ftkipftkipM
un
n
=
===
288
358)398(90.0
OKkipVV
kipkipV
un
n
9.32
217)217(00.1
=
==
-
8/8/2019 C-2020
17/20
16
-
8/8/2019 C-2020
18/20
17
-
8/8/2019 C-2020
19/20
18
-
8/8/2019 C-2020
20/20
19
Both design methods verify our previous calculations. This program isvery useful to check your calculations.
Summary
Steel beams can be designed with simple calculations, by use of tables
in the Steel Construction Manual or with computer programs. Nomatter how you design the beams, they should be checked by anothermethod. We only looked at a beam uniformly loaded. If the beam has
concentrated loads, then there may be other limit states involved (J10of the specification). These would be Flange Local Bending, Web Local
Yielding, Web Crippling, Web Sidesway Buckling, Web CompressionBuckling and Web Panel Zone Shear. This is beyond the scope of this
course. This course is to get designers interested in using the newcode by showing that it isnt that hard. It doesnt matter if you use
LRFD or ASD, both will result in a safe member.