(c) 2008 the mcgraw ‑ hill companies 1 the public finance context
TRANSCRIPT
(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 1
The Public Finance Context
(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 2
The Federal System: Sources of Revenue for Schools
• Local school districts – Primarily property taxes
• State government – Sales taxes– Income taxes
• Federal government – Income taxes
(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 3
Assessing and Understanding Taxation
Tax Yield = Tax Rate x Tax Base
(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 4
Criteria for Evaluating Taxes
• The tax base
• Yield
• Equity
• Economic effects of the tax
• Administration and compliance
(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 5
Tax Base
• The entity to which a tax rate is applied – Wealth– Income– Consumption – Privilege
(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 6
Yield
• The amount of revenue a tax will produce• Goal is broad-based taxes with low rates• Stability
– Taxes that offer a consistent yield over time are desirable from a planning perspective
• Elasticity– Measures the percentage change in yield
compared to the percentage change in the base
(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 7
Tax Equity
• Measures the “fairness” of a tax
• Horizontal equity – Equal tax treatment of individuals in the same
or equal circumstance
• Vertical equity – Different tax treatment of individuals at
different circumstances (i.e., ability to pay)
(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 8
Vertical Equity
• Progressive taxes– As the ability to pay increases, the proportion
of income taxed increases
• Regressive taxes – As the ability to pay increases, the proportion
of income taxed decreases
• Proportional taxes– As the ability to pay changes, the proportion of
income taxed remains the same
(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 9
Other Equity Issues
• Tax incidence – Who actually pays the tax?
• Income taxes
• Sales taxes
• Property taxes
• Impact of income transfers
(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 10
Economic Effects
• Goal is a neutral impact on the economy • Tax policy can impact individual or
corporate behavior– Income tax deduction for mortgage interest – Different tax rates across jurisdictions (i.e..
sales tax differences)
• Broad-based, low-rate taxes create the fewest economic distortions
(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 11
Administration and Compliance
• The more complex the tax, the greater the costs of administration and compliance – Maintaining and gathering records – Computing the tax liability – Remittance of the tax liability – Collection– Audit– Appeal– Enforcement
(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 12
Analysis: Income Tax
• Largest source of revenue for the federal government
• Used by 41 states– Three more states tax interest, dividends, and
capital gains
• Differences in how income is measured
(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 13
Analysis: Income Tax
• Generally high yield
• Most progressive of the major forms of taxation in the United States
• Reasonably stable until the 1990s
• High elasticity – Indexing of tax brackets has reduced the
elasticity
(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 14
Analysis: Income Tax
• Economic effects – Can be neutral – Many deductions and measurement issues
change this
• Costly to administer – To governments – To taxpayers
(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 15
State Income Tax Reform
• Broaden the base
• Reduce the rate
• Increase values of personal exemptions, standard deductions and earned income credits to eliminate the poor from tax rolls
• Index the entire tax structure so revenue increases are not the result of inflation
(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 16
Analysis: Sales Tax
• Most common state tax
• In use by 45 states
• Basis is consumption – But many states exempt certain purchases
• Food
• Medicine
• Clothing up to a certain expenditure level
(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 17
Analysis: Sales Tax
• Not as elastic as income taxes • Probably more stable than income taxes • Less stable than property taxes • Horizontal equity is high—tax rates are
generally uniform within a jurisdiction • Vertical equity—sales taxes tend to be
regressive because consumption as a percent of income declines as income rises
(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 18
Analysis: Sales Tax
• Economic effects depend on the mobility of products and the disparity of rates across jurisdictions
• Administration costs generally lower than for income or property taxes
• Seem to be more politically acceptable– Michigan 1994, for example
• Exportable—levied on nonresidents
(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 19
Analysis: Property Tax • Mainstay of local government financing• Basis is wealth
– Real property – Personal property (some states)
• Assessment issues – Determining true or market value – Setting alternative assessed values
• Different land use (i.e., farming )• State laws that distort assessed value (i.e., California’s
Prop. 13)
(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 20
Analysis: Property Tax
• Relatively inelastic
• Revenue is generally stable
• Equity – Disagreement about the regressivity or
progressivity of the property tax – General agreement it is regressive at income
levels below $20,000
(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 21
Analysis: Property Tax
• High administration costs – Assessment – Levy and collection of the tax
• Property tax relief– Homestead exemptions – Circuit breakers – Tax deferrals – Property tax limitations
(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 22
Analysis: Lotteries • First introduced in New Hampshire in 1964• Small portion of education revenues • Lotteries are a tax • General agreement lotteries are regressive • Revenue has shown to be relatively unstable • Revenues flatten out over time • High administration costs (often as much as 2/3 of
revenue)– Advertising and selling tickets – Prizes