(c) 2008 the mcgraw ‑ hill companies 1 the public finance context

22
(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 1 The Public Finance Context

Upload: belinda-hudson

Post on 03-Jan-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: (c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 The Public Finance Context

(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 1

The Public Finance Context

Page 2: (c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 The Public Finance Context

(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 2

The Federal System: Sources of Revenue for Schools

• Local school districts – Primarily property taxes

• State government – Sales taxes– Income taxes

• Federal government – Income taxes

Page 3: (c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 The Public Finance Context

(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 3

Assessing and Understanding Taxation

Tax Yield = Tax Rate x Tax Base

Page 4: (c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 The Public Finance Context

(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 4

Criteria for Evaluating Taxes

• The tax base

• Yield

• Equity

• Economic effects of the tax

• Administration and compliance

Page 5: (c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 The Public Finance Context

(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 5

Tax Base

• The entity to which a tax rate is applied – Wealth– Income– Consumption – Privilege

Page 6: (c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 The Public Finance Context

(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 6

Yield

• The amount of revenue a tax will produce• Goal is broad-based taxes with low rates• Stability

– Taxes that offer a consistent yield over time are desirable from a planning perspective

• Elasticity– Measures the percentage change in yield

compared to the percentage change in the base

Page 7: (c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 The Public Finance Context

(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 7

Tax Equity

• Measures the “fairness” of a tax

• Horizontal equity – Equal tax treatment of individuals in the same

or equal circumstance

• Vertical equity – Different tax treatment of individuals at

different circumstances (i.e., ability to pay)

Page 8: (c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 The Public Finance Context

(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 8

Vertical Equity

• Progressive taxes– As the ability to pay increases, the proportion

of income taxed increases

• Regressive taxes – As the ability to pay increases, the proportion

of income taxed decreases

• Proportional taxes– As the ability to pay changes, the proportion of

income taxed remains the same

Page 9: (c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 The Public Finance Context

(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 9

Other Equity Issues

• Tax incidence – Who actually pays the tax?

• Income taxes

• Sales taxes

• Property taxes

• Impact of income transfers

Page 10: (c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 The Public Finance Context

(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 10

Economic Effects

• Goal is a neutral impact on the economy • Tax policy can impact individual or

corporate behavior– Income tax deduction for mortgage interest – Different tax rates across jurisdictions (i.e..

sales tax differences)

• Broad-based, low-rate taxes create the fewest economic distortions

Page 11: (c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 The Public Finance Context

(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 11

Administration and Compliance

• The more complex the tax, the greater the costs of administration and compliance – Maintaining and gathering records – Computing the tax liability – Remittance of the tax liability – Collection– Audit– Appeal– Enforcement

Page 12: (c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 The Public Finance Context

(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 12

Analysis: Income Tax

• Largest source of revenue for the federal government

• Used by 41 states– Three more states tax interest, dividends, and

capital gains

• Differences in how income is measured

Page 13: (c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 The Public Finance Context

(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 13

Analysis: Income Tax

• Generally high yield

• Most progressive of the major forms of taxation in the United States

• Reasonably stable until the 1990s

• High elasticity – Indexing of tax brackets has reduced the

elasticity

Page 14: (c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 The Public Finance Context

(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 14

Analysis: Income Tax

• Economic effects – Can be neutral – Many deductions and measurement issues

change this

• Costly to administer – To governments – To taxpayers

Page 15: (c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 The Public Finance Context

(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 15

State Income Tax Reform

• Broaden the base

• Reduce the rate

• Increase values of personal exemptions, standard deductions and earned income credits to eliminate the poor from tax rolls

• Index the entire tax structure so revenue increases are not the result of inflation

Page 16: (c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 The Public Finance Context

(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 16

Analysis: Sales Tax

• Most common state tax

• In use by 45 states

• Basis is consumption – But many states exempt certain purchases

• Food

• Medicine

• Clothing up to a certain expenditure level

Page 17: (c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 The Public Finance Context

(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 17

Analysis: Sales Tax

• Not as elastic as income taxes • Probably more stable than income taxes • Less stable than property taxes • Horizontal equity is high—tax rates are

generally uniform within a jurisdiction • Vertical equity—sales taxes tend to be

regressive because consumption as a percent of income declines as income rises

Page 18: (c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 The Public Finance Context

(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 18

Analysis: Sales Tax

• Economic effects depend on the mobility of products and the disparity of rates across jurisdictions

• Administration costs generally lower than for income or property taxes

• Seem to be more politically acceptable– Michigan 1994, for example

• Exportable—levied on nonresidents

Page 19: (c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 The Public Finance Context

(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 19

Analysis: Property Tax • Mainstay of local government financing• Basis is wealth

– Real property – Personal property (some states)

• Assessment issues – Determining true or market value – Setting alternative assessed values

• Different land use (i.e., farming )• State laws that distort assessed value (i.e., California’s

Prop. 13)

Page 20: (c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 The Public Finance Context

(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 20

Analysis: Property Tax

• Relatively inelastic

• Revenue is generally stable

• Equity – Disagreement about the regressivity or

progressivity of the property tax – General agreement it is regressive at income

levels below $20,000

Page 21: (c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 The Public Finance Context

(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 21

Analysis: Property Tax

• High administration costs – Assessment – Levy and collection of the tax

• Property tax relief– Homestead exemptions – Circuit breakers – Tax deferrals – Property tax limitations

Page 22: (c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 The Public Finance Context

(c) 2008 The McGraw‑Hill Companies 22

Analysis: Lotteries • First introduced in New Hampshire in 1964• Small portion of education revenues • Lotteries are a tax • General agreement lotteries are regressive • Revenue has shown to be relatively unstable • Revenues flatten out over time • High administration costs (often as much as 2/3 of

revenue)– Advertising and selling tickets – Prizes